The Bantu Migration Never Happened, It Was A Nilo-Saharan(Zanj) Invasion :: Part I
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 тра 2024
- The adoption of this inaccurate Bantu Migration theory has been a result of ignoring African History before European Imperialism, which explains the origins and conditions that led to the formation of many of the modern ethnic groups in Africa.
The presence of the Proto-Bantu in Southern Africa as early as 3000 BCE, throws the entire Bantu Migration theory out the window, because this theory states that the people speaking Bantu languages began migrating out of West-Central Africa in approximately 400 CE.
It’s not a pretty story, many won’t like it, but begins to explain proclivities, loyalties and why things are how they are.
If you'd like to show your support for the creation of these videos, you can give to out kofi here :: ko-fi.com/yenzi
Thanks for watching
Thank you Honey!!! As an American descendant of slavery we get ZERO information about true African beginnings trace back to. This was Great!!!! ❤
That is not true. We have the BANTU migration in our bloodline, it's like a map. Every country is represented.
You are correct however PARTLY. THE Bantu actually did migrate and the Bantu were once all across the Northern parts of Africa and left. You saying they were never found in the Northern parts isn't correct and you contradict yourself.
Already I disagree Christianity was never in Africa before European came here they brought it Ethiopia was the first country to be christianised during king Ezana who was converted into Christianity by a French missionary
According to my understanding, the Zanj were black people from East Africa enslaved by Arabs and in the Middle East. Before Black people were enslaved, Black people had already travelled the world. There was Black populations in India, Pakistan, Iran, Irag, Palestine. The most of the Black people out of these populations came back to Africa. So these migrations have been happening for millennia. The Zanj/Islamic story is more recent, 700 A.D. the Zanj were a small group and could have not affected Africa much. When you take into consideration/study the ancient histories of Asia, the Black people who populated and civilized those lands, it will make sense that there was a migration in Africa. The first calendar in the world in South Africa is more than 100 000 years old. The oldest calculator 20 000 years from Congo. All these people are one. The creators of the calendar are the civilizers of Iran and India. Coming out of Africa to civilize the world and back to Africa
Zanj is a very derogatory term & not a culturally specific term. Bantu a word which was taken to classify languages into one major group (quite arbitrarily applied). All these are theories- a lot of stuff happens in 9k years. Larger groups split into smaller groups and smaller groups built larger ones. In addition, other people did this too and they mingle and create new groups but throughout the millennia preserve certain ethical teachings, certain linguistic similarities but then again, integrate cultural elements from other people and this is why there is this high diversity in looks. Nonetheless, in Western culture a lot of people racialise Bantu as if were a phenotype. In the end: Those who know the connections, genealogy, bonds and the stories of migrations, wars and peace making know. Like Baba Credo Mutes said:”Bantu are the most stubborn people on the planet” so no one can ever come up with any theory which will be acceptable for all: In the end, motho/muntu identity is not to be theorised, analysed but to be lived which can only happen when you (collectively) have ancestral land to bond with and to administer. Currently, the UAE owns African territory in the size of the UK - we know the common origin of our many people but will never agree upon how and when it happened. So, let us just focus on not having more of our sacred land controlled by foreign hands. Khotso (Peace)
THE "BANTU" NEVER EXISTED
I absolutely love your work. It’s the slavery that gets to me 💔.. I have a BIG question for you - one which nobody has been able to answer. The term “Guthetha” , or “thema” seems to Historically ONLY have an Egyptian connection (stretching of chords). Yet in Semitic texts the term seems to be linked to the very Arabs in the north. This is confusing because according to our languages South of the Sahara, the terms links to cutting or “black”, yet there’s no actual origin of this word. Every Bantu group has a word for “cut” or “black” being “Ndima” or “Tema”… yet tHEma with the “h” gives a whole new meaning. Please assist.
There were kingdoms in the South of Africa before Christianity and Islam. That history is still missing
Any sources ?
Best video on the internet...I love this.
This is so informative
wow randomly found this... This is an interesting topic
This was very insightful ✊🏿
This is so informative, you are filling in the blanks to our African history that has been lost or corrupted for years😮. You also have a beautiful voice, easy on the ears so that we can absorb this beautiful information. Your content is of great quality, your channel will be growing fast 😊. Thank you 🙏🏾
Great video what are some of the books or resources to study African history?
I thought the Bantu migration happened in 1500 B.C?? The OOA model and linguist models seem to place that migration at that time frame, which appears inclusive of Natufian migrations. Also, the y-dna haplogroup E of both Bantu and Natufians means they were a related people. It is my belief they are the same group being reclassified with a new name. Author Jacqueline Battalora said it best in her book, The birth of a “white nation", 'white people were created to cause division".
Thanks for your videos! May you please share some sources from time to time.
Thank you so much I was asking God for something like this. ✝️✝️✝️
This was bloody sad😥