@@biofixphysicaltherapy5353bad open dates I think they should make it one time after the entirety of the playoffs it just doesn’t make sense to have it open before it ends
@@JBeck9932 so where does the extra money that schools generate go after they’ve reached their cap? Texas and Ohio state don’t need the same cap as Boston college and the Boston colleges can’t afford the same caps as the other two schools so what should we do?
Gotta fix the portal issue of no loyalty..or so called earnings potential. I'm all for these kids making bucks but you can't build a team when you're constantly being poached.
The NIL is the ugly result of the NCAA pretending to be pure to the bitter end. Had they just paid everyone 3-4k per month it never would have gotten here.
I’m still blown away that FSU still got left out being undefeated. All we heard for 10 years was you control your own destiny. Win your games and you’re in.
Having conferences get a certain number in is the same way you he champions leave works in Europe. It works just fine there. Top leagues like France Spain Germany and Italy get way more in than the smaller nations which only get one. ThThe beat leagues get the most teams. Makes sense. The conferences with the deepest competition deserve the most
We need to quit pretending these players are student athletes. Dump the NCAA. Real contracts for players that can bind them for multiple years or just one year. One transfer portal (free agency period).
2:00 JD money people still understand over saturation. Why doesn’t every state have a Disney World or Disney Land? Why isn’t there a Walmart and Target every mile? The money people are aware that there is a point where it’s a bad investment.
Yeah but if you have zero byes… and 16 teams.. that’s 15 games.. it’s about money you don’t think ncaa and tv deals aren’t licking their chops at more playoff games especially first round being home field games that’s the best round..
A couple of things. There needs to be one recruiting and transfer portal day and it needs to come at the end of Feb or early March. Having either before the season is over is stupid and it messes up both recruiting and/or coaching hires. The bye need to go. If they do this, the number of teams in the mix either goes to 4, 8, or 16. Also, the more teams you have in the playoffs, the less the regular season means. With the opt-outs the non-playoff bowl games are as interesting as watching paint dry. When you have all of these teams in the playoffs, the regular season is diminished, the bowl season is diminished and as we've seen, the conference championships are diminished. We've cut CFB down to a few weeks in Dec-Jan and killed it's major draw. How fun! NIL was supposed to be for certain players whose fame could be leveraged for advertising. It was never meant to be used for paying all players. If you want to pay players, have revenue sharing designed in a way where players sign contracts. If I was paying a player, unless there was an injury, they will play in bowl games and failure to do so would force a repayment of all monies including scholarships. These contracts could be done in many ways but the NIL model is inherently flawed. I'll stop here. No sense in beating a dead playoff team.
I don’t think CFB is broken, but it’s definitely heading that way. Imho, 3 factors have deteriorated the pageantry of CFB: 1. Greed 2. NCAA staying idle 3. Inept Conference Commissioners Between the Bowl Committees & TV execs, they’ve all but killed the essence of the regular season & bowl games. CFB is not the NFL; it’s a niche sports product, & the importance of the regular season is what separated it from all sports. The implications of the bowl games, even if it wasn’t for the Nat’l Title, meant something for rankings the following season. The NCAA could’ve gotten ahead of all of this, by stepping into the 21st Century. Instead of trying to fight Ed O’Bannon, things could’ve been settled out of court, & guidelines could’ve been set up. Everything became reactionary b/c of SCOTUS’ ruling, w/ haphazard guidelines put in place leading to multiple, exploitable loop holes. Between the Big 12 (before Yormark), The ACC, & the former PAC-12, we saw a ton of misplaced business decisions that either crippled values or collapsed a conference. This unfortunately led to the Big 2 leading the way. Strong leadership from both conferences since the 90’s. What’s head scratching about this is they set precedence, yet past commissioners fell asleep at the wheel, particularly the PAC-12 & ACC.
The SEC is becoming less and less dominant. No reason for other conferences to cave into their demands when in 5 years there will be no difference between the P4.
SEC still dominate the only reason why a big 10:12 national championship because they got players from SCC going over there and the coaching staff going over there that's why so don't be hating on SCC they still dominate
The salary cap has nothing to do with “helping little ol’ Cornell.” It has to do with the fact that the current NIL “model” is entirely unsustainable, even for the big guys. It has all the budgeting characteristics of the federal government. Yes, Alabama, Ohio State, Texas, A&M, Michigan, USC, etc. have big money alumni and donors, but even they will eventually have to reassess their spending on these kids when- like professional athletes’ contracts- the NIL bar keeps raising to the point that it raises too high to justify bankrolling a kid for maybe two years before he possibly jets off to another school. Having a hard salary cap will keep the NIL deals limited, and it will be easier for athletic departments to track and allocate funds to the different sports. It could even save some schools’ sports if they are able to use that extra money to offer other athletes.
This was great this season and we don’t want to ever go back to less teams this season was important than it has ever been so that’s not true about the regular season at all
It goes both ways. Games become more important for teams fighting to get into the playoff, but at the top, games do lose importance. Ohio St and Notre Dame are the quickest and clearest examples. In the older system, neither would have made it because of their regular season losses, but obviously they both made the title in the new system, which does make those previous games practically meaningless..
I think your sentiment is correct at how the committee will skew their views. For them, it means more SEC and Big10. The problem with any hypothetical this year, who makes a better pick than SMU (that were right there in the mix). Based on how those teams played, they wouldn't have doen any better.
I don't know how people watch videos and come up with some of these trolling comments. He only stated the absolute measurable facts which are that the SEC and BIG 10 bring in the majority of the money so they should get a bigger chunk of the playoff spots. I watched it 3 times to make sure I didn't miss anything but at no point did he say that the SEC or at team in the SEC was superior to anyone else
@ if you are in a playoff it should be because you won enough games to be there or because you are superior to the other teams in your conference. No conference deserves more slots in the playoffs because they make more money. Win games and get there like everyone else. I love that Alabama, South Carolina, and Tennessee proved that the SEC didn’t deserve all the spots they were crying about deserving. The good old days are over where no once could touch the SEC. The proof is how people now add the BIG10 into the conversation. They were not even mentioned before 2 years ago. The transfer portal and NIL has leveled the playing field.
The B1G has no incentive to help the SEC. The SEC has done nothing but dump on the B1G for 20 years and now yall want a hand out to help you because the playoffs changed? GTFOH.
Player earning potential should be direcrly tied to the number of years they spend at the same university. If a player wants to transfer every year they can but they would be dropped back down to freshmen earning potential. To anyone who says it's unfair to the player to place this sort of restriction i say in the real world this is how it works. You want to work at a specific location for a.specific salary? Well there are expectations from your employer & rules of conduct.
If those in charge had decided to make the players employees of the school and to give them all the benefits of being employees, sure, 100%. But they haven't, and they aren't. Not yet. The problem is that the NCAA has fought making the players employees for years, so this is where we are. Isn't the players' fault. It's the NCAA and the schools that have created this by trying to have it both ways for so long.
So you believe that schools should continue to make billions of children from jersey sales tickets marketing name imagine likeness.. while the kids gets nothing.. because the real stars sometimes don’t grad and go to the league with no degree.. so what did they actually get.. clearly you weren’t a division 1 athlete like myself so you don’t know shit
@ it’s a college not a place to get rich but I guess everyone has forgotten that while millions get poured into athletics and everything else goes to waste
The funny thing is all the same people that said Notre Dame is irrelevant is now the main people talking about Notre Dame. They see how Notre Dame took home 20 million for themselves and not having to share now they big mad😂😂😂. Notre Dame needs to be in a Conference that's not fair. LOL
No one is worried about ND, and they will remain to be irrelevant when it comes to winning a national championship so fans just need to stay use to that ceiling.
@@blackmambaram7034Huh? Just say you don’t watch ball. Notre Dame is an ascendant team clearly. They literally made it to the Natty with a ton of Freshman and Sophomores. They are gonna be perennially good.
Why does Notre Dame need to be in a conference? Just so they have to share money? Lots of people share this opinion, but can't give a good reason other than the money sharing? That, to me, is not enough of a reason.
@@boschlosser10just proved you didn’t care about ND all year. They got incredibly injured so they had to put out backups who did just as well as the starters. Yeah, the loss of Coogan and Spondler sucks, but it won’t hurt all too much
it really doesn't. it will just put the best players on the best teams which are usually the programs with the most money anyway. it actually hurts the smaller schools who capitalize on recruiting/developing great players, they won't be able to go million for million with a top tier program.
I will say this-I am less interested in CFB than I’ve ever been. It was the last bastion where the competition seemed sincere and not a battle between whores. Players deserved to be paid for sure. They’re not under contract. The contracts of most coaches and staff are from the public, they’re government employees. This is a subsidy of a bunch of billionaires developmental league-everyone knows these aren’t student athletes-there are exceptions of course but this has played out badly-for me. Again, glad the young men are finally getting paid. The 2025 Rose Bowl sick out/injury out says it all-Ducks money going to the PAC (1)2 because of contracts exposes what happened to me, pre game injuries in warm up. We watch a fraud. CFB went from pure to whore really quick, or slowly and I just wasn’t that clued in. No problem letting this one go too-I don’t cheer for laundry and for teams the players and the coaches playing don’t care about.
Listening to you if SMU should not be in then ole miss should not be in overrated has never won anything e will never win so Really there’s only three teams in SEC that are good and most years its the same three teams the rest of the conference is bad or terrible
How’s this: scrap the conference championship games and name a conference champ after the regular season. Play bowl games like we used to, but giving the major bowls to better ranked teams, and crown an AP National Champion like before the BCS. After that use the final rankings to seed for the playoff. All games played on campus. These guys play for the CFP Championship.
Top 16 teams in the playoff. Use the final rankings after the conference champions. Then roll all the bowl games into 4 or 8 teams groups so all the left outs get 2-3 more games. So the winner of the Holliday Bowl plays the winner of the Alamo bowl etc etc
Kids should be required to stay for a minimum of two years at the school they originally sign with. After that, they can transfer once more until they complete their degree. Then they can transfer as a grad transfer. This yearly option to transfer is silly. You’re going to hurt college football - especially for mid-tier teams who can’t afford to keep star players. How depressing is it when you’re a Washington state fan and your one and only star player decides to leave. That’s what their QB is doing. Why continue to invest in my team when kids are just looking at it as a stepping stone?
@@gsterf Why? Why should a student be limited on where he or she chooses to go to school and work? If they go the collective bargaining route, fine. But then student athletes would gain significant concessions from the schools, and that would almost certainly lead to higher pay for the players at the top 60/85 programs. Let’s keep it a buck, the money needs to come from the bloated coaching salaries. The money is there for 25m/yr payrolls for the players, maybe higher. It’s the coach’s salaries that have gotten out of control. Half the coaching salaries and that’s an extra 7M at many major schools.
@@OhioVworld it wouldnt limit the student on where to go: itd ensure that they would want to stay loyal to a team and if they didnt they wouldnt get a paycheck out of switching, thats all. the student would be free to go wherever but if its about money itll show. it wont stop transfers at all, only slow down the process so that we dont have the mess that we do now, and smaller schools will still be able to compete because their players wont just leave after a year for money unless they dont actually like the program. going the employment route would make the ncaa no different than the NFL, and would make other sports professional overnight. everything like paperwork and transfers would be so much harder and players would be back to getting paid under the table again. no college player should get over 500k for a year of playing and out of transferring for a year. its stupid amounts of money for one player that could be a bust (im an fsu fan, i know the pain) but i also agree that coach salaries are stupid. its made a lot of coaches complacent and the sport is getting ruined in front of our eyes
Florida is good, and will be good. They may start 2-2, because they play at LSU and at Miami in September, tho I'd bet they win one of those. Wouldn't mean they're not good if they did lose em both, tho. You're good if you go 8-4 with the schedule they have. It's brutal. 9-3, and you should probably be in the playoff.
@ litedawg The NFL has collective bargaining and a player union and a huge split of profits go to players. And they have CONTRACTS. Let me know when universities sign up for that. Oh wait they stopped that from happening. They could also make contracts with NIL and transferring and $.
@@jbaker7439 hey doofus, they actually cant do that because it would violate anti trust laws, come back to me when you actually know what youre talking about.
I am and have been a huge college football fan for most of my life. I would watch college football from the first game into the next day when Hawaii was playing a home game. I explain this because this season I found my interest starting to wane after the second round of playoffs and my favorite team was IN the playoffs. While I support the expanded 12, it made the season too long. Expanding the playoffs even more is IMO a bad idea unless they shorten the regular season as well. If the current system can begin to cause a major fan season fatigue, a longer one would likely turn me off even more. The 2024 season NC game teams played 16 games in a single season. That is simply too many games. this isn't the NFL. The recruiting and portal schedules are what really need addressed, not an even more expansive playoff schedule. Also spread the playoff games out and don't have them all on a single channel. If other stations are involved, the playoffs as a whole will receive more exposure and promotion.
I just love how during the playoffs before the season ended talked soooooooo much about the playoff format changing next year and BIG & SEC will have autobids……you heard it NON STOP! Now they changing that tune and it’s 2026 and not next year 2025……Brett Y. Big 12 commish shut that down
This presumes any team in any conference championship game ought to be in the playoffs. That shouldn’t necessarily be the case. Even the conference winners can’t simply be automatically in the playoffs. Boise State as an example. They were a fun team in the 2024 season but they shouldn’t have been in there amongst the strongest teams in the country. They weren’t at the same level as the others. Same goes for SMU. Love seeing the ponies do well but they weren’t of the highest caliber in the playoffs. How to sort it out better? That’s a tough task. Not one I’d want.
Nope. 16 teams, no bye weeks. More playoff games are better than more meaningless bowl games. Those teams ranked 9-16 will be playing in a bowl game anyways, just make it in the playoff.
If salary caps won't work, why are they so effective in most professional sports.? Those teams are not restricted in facility spending, coaching spending, etc...the things you describe as being major difference makers in college athletics, but there is much more parity on the field. Maybe you impose a salary tax and make it much more expensive to outstanding the other teams but to do nothing the odds on 4 or 6 teams essentially owning championships will not go away. At that point you might as well creat a super conference of the teams that can do more with more and let the teams that can do more with less compete among themselves.
The easiest solution to this is to allow auto bids for every one who makes the conference championship game. The winners gets buy weeks, and the looser play in the first round, then that leave 3 teams at large bids, they don't want to do that because they want more control over auto bids so they can put who they want in the playoffs.
@@JoeMama-cs3te I disagree, Penn state , Indiana offense not good enough, I will say sec is the best conference, but not as wide a margin they like us to believe. I rate beig ten bout same as acc and big 12
If you give Cornell Kent State or Arkansas State the same kind of money that Ohio State that Alabama Georgia has then they can hire those kind of coaches and developers and they can compete
Create the NIT of college football. We don't need more teams in the playoff. If we do add teams, 4 more max so there are no first round byes. I would like to see some reseeding after each round. Oregon having to play OSU as their first game was just wild. Oregon would have beat any other team in the playoff. OSU was the clear best team in the country this year and at the end of the day, the best team in fact, won it all.
Disagree on most of your takes...going to 14 teams is dumb....it means some teams continue to get byes and with that an advantage over others. Salary Cap is necessary to stop someone like say Oregon have a sugar daddy that will dump millions into buying players. No one should have that kind of influence. heck now I'm reading NIL for some schools will be close to $40M which is rediculous and let me add allowing an expansion where kids can now play college football for 6-7 years is dumb as well...when a QB is 27 years old and still playing is a joke.
You can say the same thing about clemson.. they wouldn't have made it in without the conference championship..and the Cornells of the world have never completed with Ohio st.... .. what a cap does is help the smaller schools keep more of their players... your take is not bright
They need to put regulations on NIL and penalties on tampering first and foremost. With the playoffs they should have done 8 teams but it's whatever. 1. Fix seeding. 2. Home games run through 2nd round 3. Fixed championship location for national championship with rotating the other big bowls in the semi finals
@ heh heh. I wondered but I also figured it could simply be a term I don’t know and I wanted to learn it if the latter were the case. My fingers are skinny but I use them as if they’re fat, ha ha.🤣
The portal is a nightmare and this is coming from a Miami Hurricanes fan! I can’t blame players for chasing NIL deals but I hate it! I love my Hurricanes and my Hurricanes only! However the players are not loyal to the school they’re playing for! They are in it for the money! If I could capitalize off of my athletic ability I would probably go that route as well. So I can’t blame these players! Only about 1.6% of college football players ever play in the NFL so if a kid can make some significant money in college and hopefully get an education that will improve his life than I don’t blame them!
That’s your culture.. look at my team Michigan.. we lost zero guys you were our core or serious contributors.. we even lost our head coach last year and still kept the core.. so that’s on your school coach and culture to keep guys
@@donaldwhitfield2794 somewhat true. Arch Manning could’ve transferred and started elsewhere but he stayed loyal to Texas because it wasn’t all about the scratch he could gave raked in. Now he’s QB1 at Texas and he’ll be better for being patient and learning along the way. That team at Texas in the 2025 season will likely benefit from his patience.
@@UNKLchannel1 Arch is an exception to the rule out there! I do agree he as well as Texas will benefit from him being patient! But what would it have looked like if Ewers came back for his senior year? Would Arch have sat for a 3rd year? Also I don't think Arch is desperate for money his current NIL deal is worth 3.1 mil and the thought is he'll probably be able to cash in when he goes pro. But no guarantees of course!
No auto bids for playoffs. If you cant make top 12, you shouldn't have a shot for a championship. Limit transfers per player. Cap limits per player not per team. No opt-outs for players in post season, or they get a deduction in nil money.
I think that they should: 1. Play Army/Navy game week 0. 2. Allow 16 playoffs teams 3. Allow 5 top conference ranked teams guaranteed playoffs, but based on ranking 4. Get rid of conference championship games and instead play 1st round playoffs (8 games on Friday/Saturday) on the first weekend in December 5. Play 2nd round on 2nd weekend of December (4 games). 6. Play 3rd round on 3rd weekend of December (2 games). 7. Play Nationals Championship game on January 1st
I get what you are saying about salary cap , but in no world should you just be able to buy whatever roster you want bc you have more money backing your program.
Salary caps aren’t to help Cornell. They keep things from getting out of control. Didn’t Miami just give Beck 4 million dollars? Teams need a cap and individual players need a cap
Why is this about conferences when not every team participating is not in a conference this whole thing makes no sense id leave conferences ND don’t have to play in a conference nor share money with a conference
@ the problem I’m pointing out is I wouldn’t agree with ND playing in the conference playoff and there not in a conference no team should be in a CFP that’s not in a conference plain and simple
It just amazes me how baby people just comment nonsense about videos that are not even what the man said. "There he goes with his SEC bias" like that's not what the man said of anyone would listen rather than projecting. What he said is just logical capitalism. The conferences that generate the majority of the revenue are going to use that point to negotiate for guaranteed playoff spots if and when the playoffs expands. At no point did he say that the SEC was superior or that they are dominant. He did point out that SMU got spanked and that could lead to the committee second guessing putting a team like them in a future playoff scenerio in favor of possibly an SEC team or BIG 10 team but i think that's a pretty common opinion shared by alot of ppl. Im not one of them but ive heard it many times since the SMU game although Tennessee also got their teeth kicked in but i don't think that makes his point irrelevant. Secondly, FSU was the only undefeated power 5 team to miss the CFP in the history of the CFP now that's only 10 what now 11 years sooo it's not a long history but its still a pretty unfair thing to do to 90 other kids because there qb got hurt and to point to the beat down they faced in their bowl game as evidence that they didn't belong is very close minded. They didn't play one half of their starters, i can't imagine those kids gave a care about even being there after being snubbed and even if none of those things were true they went undefeated in what the NCAA wants to call a Power conference. Regardless of weather or not they got the snot kicked out of them they earned the right to be there. Injuries should never prevent a team from being allowed to compete in a game that the entire team earned a right to be in.
Here's my take for what it's worth on Football. Juggle it a little one way or the other: I KNOW THIS WON'T BE POPULAR WITH SEC AND BIG 10 Hire a Commissioner: Go ahead and Name Nick Saban first one... Have 8 Board Members: One from each Conference, Commissioner gets deciding vote on any tie votes Establish rules and regulations on NIL, Portal, Television Rights Eight Conferences with 16 teams and divide those 8 Conferences into 2 Leagues (4x2)x16= 128 Schools Each Conference has 2 Divisions Best Wins in each Division Plays for Conference Title: First Round of Playoffs = 16 Teams 8 Winners goes to round 2, Random Draw on opponents by lottery: Winners to next Round 4 Winners in Semi Finals, Random Draw by Lottery Remaing Teams play for National Championship I know SEC and Big 10 wouldn't like this but tough shit. Everybody gets a chance and all the games matter. Yes, You're Going to get some Shitty Games but, we had some this year This works on same basic principle as the NFL and you don't hear the fans complaining because all the games matter
JD, SMU looked better than Georgia and Tennessee in the playoffs. That's exactly why you and your peers got shredded over being PERCEIVED as SEC homers because of your use of selective examples. If anything, based on performance, you should have had LESS SEC teams in.
Stop it. That's insane. No they didn't. Ohio St clearly was the best team in the end, rolled the playoffs, beat the Big 10 Champ pretty much the exact same way they beat Tennessee. Are you gonna argue that the Oregon and the Big 10 is overrated because of Oregon's loss? Of course not. Also, Texas from the SEC was the only team that really had a shot at Ohio St. Georgia lost to the national runner up by 23-10, with a backup qb. Wasn't necessarily close, but was no blowout. SMU, on the other hand, was absolutely blown out, and by the team that was beaten by the team that beat UGA. Penn St/SMU was over midway through the 2nd quarter. So I'm not sure what you're smoking, but please share with the rest of us.
The national championship should be the only game played on a neutral field. As a Ducks fan I honestly believe Ohio State was the best team in the top 12. With that being said why is the first seed team not getting a home game. We need to stop with the bowl games.
12 is more than enough, they need to be seeded by AP rank, Coaches rank, or what ever. But conference championship should have no bearing on it. You can’t be 19 th rank team and get in by winning a championship
I have 2 suggestions for the all mighty ncaa: 1:transfer portal: players cannot transfer until after they’re sophomore year, this ensures buy in from incoming recruits. 2: CFB Playoff: Rank the best teams 1-12 regardless of who they’re conference championship.
Neither of your comments are even relevant. First of all the "schools" aren't dictating spots the conferences are. Logically if your not in the SEC or BIG 10 you want expansion so you have a better shot to make the playoffs. If you had listened, what he said was that the 2 top conferences for revenue are not going to sign off on expanding the playoffs without a guarantee of having x amount of playoff spots. To change the current format all conferences will have to agree on a new expanded format which is where dominating for the past 10 years like the SEC and recently the BIG 10 have gives you the ability to demand playoff spots. To your second point the only games that are scheduled by the schools are non conference games and if you have been paying attention to non conference games in the past 5 years, top 25 match ups are becoming more and more rare because everyone is scheduling cupcakes. When 3/4 of your schedule is generated for you i think having 2 or 3 "preseason" games against cupcakes is actually pretty reasonable. I think you're gonna see teams move to full conference schedules in the next 10 years with these 16 team super conferences
Playoffs did not live up to expectations. 2 teams that ended up in national championship did not play in conference championship games. So how are they the best team in the nation when they couldn't even win their own conference. We're going to lose fans in college football if we don't change the playoffs and fix the portal .
Money changes people, and more times than not, that's not a good thing. I want players on my team who are there because they love the school and they love the game, not because their mama needs a new house, and they want a $75,000 car. IMO paying a teenage football player multiple thousands or even millions of dollars is way out of line, on so many different levels. If that's what we're going to do, why not eliminate the middleman and take college out of the equation. All these wealthy teams will just be football factories where they get kids ready to play in the NFL. Hell, after making multiple millions of dollars over the course of 3 or 4 years, many would probably choose to forgo the NFL and retire from football at age 22 or 23. We're creating a greater financial divide between the classes. I don't think it's good for college football and I don't think it's good for the country. I believe NIL must be capped and the cap should be a reasonable figure for a kid of 18. What does it do to a kid who works a part time job, making minimum wage one day to having a million bucks in his pocket the next? I don't know. I could go on and on with questions and thoughts and ideas about all this and maybe never come to the right conclusion. But someone needs to ask all these questions and consider all the scenarios and come up with some commonsense rules for NIL and revenue sharing in college football. If they don't get a handle on this; I think it will ultimately ruin the game and ruin lives. I could go on another rant about the transfer portal, but I won't, this time.
They need to fix the transfer portal.
What’s wrong with it?
His team isn’t getting guys or loosing em that’s why
@@biofixphysicaltherapy5353bad open dates I think they should make it one time after the entirety of the playoffs it just doesn’t make sense to have it open before it ends
@ wrong we got Amari Jefferson and two good guards and a running back that will likely have some good play time
@@biofixphysicaltherapy5353 the open times make no sense right now it should be one open period after the championship game
Should only allow 2 transfers per college career and there needs to be an even NIL salary cap across the board
Well that depends are you counting a grad transfer in there as well..
@@boschlosser10grad transfers have always been aloud to transfer without penalty. That has nothing to do with the current transfer rules.
Agreed for undergraduates. graduate students should be seperate.
No
@@JBeck9932 so where does the extra money that schools generate go after they’ve reached their cap? Texas and Ohio state don’t need the same cap as Boston college and the Boston colleges can’t afford the same caps as the other two schools so what should we do?
There should only be the spring transfer window. December already has the postseason and the peak of HS recruiting.
Right now, whoever has the most money will inevitably be the best teams... no way around it. UNLESS they get smart and fix the Portal/NIL.
Gotta fix the portal issue of no loyalty..or so called earnings potential.
I'm all for these kids making bucks but you can't build a team when you're constantly being poached.
That’s your culture
The NIL is the ugly result of the NCAA pretending to be pure to the bitter end. Had they just paid everyone 3-4k per month it never would have gotten here.
If you allow the players to unionize and collectively bargain, you can restrict player movement. The Supreme Court already decided this issue.
Stop giving so much money up front. Merit based compensation and a big payday at graduation.
@ How much do you think these players are making? The vast majority of them aren’t even making 6 figures.
the 12 team playoff was great. The problem is NIL, but more so, the transfer portal to grab and gain more NIL like Michigan QB at $10m
Easy. Limit transfer portal & put a salary cap on NIL
Im not a expert but portal gotta get fixed each year more and more players will be running around grabbing checks
Salary cap requires a collective bargaining agreement which require employee status.
I’m still blown away that FSU still got left out being undefeated. All we heard for 10 years was you control your own destiny. Win your games and you’re in.
And what happened when they played Georgia in their bowl game without the stud quarterback. There's your answer bro
did u see what happend to them vs georgia and then this year BAHAHAHA
@ half the team didn’t play. The game didn’t matter. I’m not a fan and don’t care I just thought that was crap. That’s all
@@nathanpayne5358 everyone that got in over fsu would have best fsu with their back up qb in...
That's just a fact
I’m still blown away that FSU fans are still stuck on this. Y’all just went 2-10. Try worrying about the present 😂
Having conferences get a certain number in is the same way you he champions leave works in Europe. It works just fine there. Top leagues like France Spain Germany and Italy get way more in than the smaller nations which only get one. ThThe beat leagues get the most teams. Makes sense. The conferences with the deepest competition deserve the most
UGA was manhandled on both sides of the ball. Beck makes zero difference 😂
if we put in salary cap we go bk to the times where players got their money under the table and teams basically do what SEC did for 20yrs
I agree 💯 Teams will still pay more under the table !
No proof as always just excuse why their team or conference didn't win championships
We need to quit pretending these players are student athletes. Dump the NCAA. Real contracts for players that can bind them for multiple years or just one year. One transfer portal (free agency period).
2:00 JD money people still understand over saturation. Why doesn’t every state have a Disney World or Disney Land? Why isn’t there a Walmart and Target every mile? The money people are aware that there is a point where it’s a bad investment.
Why? Why expand? Always bound to be someone left out. Don't think the playoff field needs more participants.
Yeah but if you have zero byes… and 16 teams.. that’s 15 games.. it’s about money you don’t think ncaa and tv deals aren’t licking their chops at more playoff games especially first round being home field games that’s the best round..
$$$
A couple of things. There needs to be one recruiting and transfer portal day and it needs to come at the end of Feb or early March. Having either before the season is over is stupid and it messes up both recruiting and/or coaching hires.
The bye need to go. If they do this, the number of teams in the mix either goes to 4, 8, or 16. Also, the more teams you have in the playoffs, the less the regular season means. With the opt-outs the non-playoff bowl games are as interesting as watching paint dry. When you have all of these teams in the playoffs, the regular season is diminished, the bowl season is diminished and as we've seen, the conference championships are diminished. We've cut CFB down to a few weeks in Dec-Jan and killed it's major draw. How fun!
NIL was supposed to be for certain players whose fame could be leveraged for advertising. It was never meant to be used for paying all players. If you want to pay players, have revenue sharing designed in a way where players sign contracts. If I was paying a player, unless there was an injury, they will play in bowl games and failure to do so would force a repayment of all monies including scholarships. These contracts could be done in many ways but the NIL model is inherently flawed. I'll stop here. No sense in beating a dead playoff team.
I don’t think CFB is broken, but it’s definitely heading that way. Imho, 3 factors have deteriorated the pageantry of CFB:
1. Greed
2. NCAA staying idle
3. Inept Conference Commissioners
Between the Bowl Committees & TV execs, they’ve all but killed the essence of the regular season & bowl games. CFB is not the NFL; it’s a niche sports product, & the importance of the regular season is what separated it from all sports. The implications of the bowl games, even if it wasn’t for the Nat’l Title, meant something for rankings the following season.
The NCAA could’ve gotten ahead of all of this, by stepping into the 21st Century. Instead of trying to fight Ed O’Bannon, things could’ve been settled out of court, & guidelines could’ve been set up. Everything became reactionary b/c of SCOTUS’ ruling, w/ haphazard guidelines put in place leading to multiple, exploitable loop holes.
Between the Big 12 (before Yormark), The ACC, & the former PAC-12, we saw a ton of misplaced business decisions that either crippled values or collapsed a conference. This unfortunately led to the Big 2 leading the way. Strong leadership from both conferences since the 90’s. What’s head scratching about this is they set precedence, yet past commissioners fell asleep at the wheel, particularly the PAC-12 & ACC.
I thought they voted to change it to 10 days in january after the playoffs end for the transfer portal.
When are we going to have the kids sign a contract for how long they want to be somewhere. (1,2,3, yrs) Then coaches can recruit accordingly.
Gunner wasn’t the problem in that game! The left tackle not blocking on two plays and the kickoff return was the difference.
The transfer portal shouldn't start until the National Championship has been played.
Portal needs to be fixed and Nil big time.
The SEC is becoming less and less dominant. No reason for other conferences to cave into their demands when in 5 years there will be no difference between the P4.
SEC still dominate the only reason why a big 10:12 national championship because they got players from SCC going over there and the coaching staff going over there that's why so don't be hating on SCC they still dominate
The studio research in the last 20 years how many national championship SEC won
@@thomassin5816
@@thomassin58😂🤡
@@thomassin58because of more access not earned…
The salary cap has nothing to do with “helping little ol’ Cornell.” It has to do with the fact that the current NIL “model” is entirely unsustainable, even for the big guys. It has all the budgeting characteristics of the federal government. Yes, Alabama, Ohio State, Texas, A&M, Michigan, USC, etc. have big money alumni and donors, but even they will eventually have to reassess their spending on these kids when- like professional athletes’ contracts- the NIL bar keeps raising to the point that it raises too high to justify bankrolling a kid for maybe two years before he possibly jets off to another school. Having a hard salary cap will keep the NIL deals limited, and it will be easier for athletic departments to track and allocate funds to the different sports. It could even save some schools’ sports if they are able to use that extra money to offer other athletes.
HS players should have to stay 2 years. ONE time transfer limit.
Are you forgetting all 4 of the conference champions lost there games.
Why are the Colorado Buffalos, middle center, on the cover of this video? Should the Vanderbilt Commodores be front and center too? 😂
This was great this season and we don’t want to ever go back to less teams this season was important than it has ever been so that’s not true about the regular season at all
It goes both ways. Games become more important for teams fighting to get into the playoff, but at the top, games do lose importance. Ohio St and Notre Dame are the quickest and clearest examples. In the older system, neither would have made it because of their regular season losses, but obviously they both made the title in the new system, which does make those previous games practically meaningless..
I think your sentiment is correct at how the committee will skew their views. For them, it means more SEC and Big10. The problem with any hypothetical this year, who makes a better pick than SMU (that were right there in the mix). Based on how those teams played, they wouldn't have doen any better.
SEC got whooped and this guy is still spewing are the SEC talking points…
I don't know how people watch videos and come up with some of these trolling comments. He only stated the absolute measurable facts which are that the SEC and BIG 10 bring in the majority of the money so they should get a bigger chunk of the playoff spots. I watched it 3 times to make sure I didn't miss anything but at no point did he say that the SEC or at team in the SEC was superior to anyone else
@ if you are in a playoff it should be because you won enough games to be there or because you are superior to the other teams in your conference. No conference deserves more slots in the playoffs because they make more money. Win games and get there like everyone else. I love that Alabama, South Carolina, and Tennessee proved that the SEC didn’t deserve all the spots they were crying about deserving. The good old days are over where no once could touch the SEC. The proof is how people now add the BIG10 into the conversation. They were not even mentioned before 2 years ago. The transfer portal and NIL has leveled the playing field.
You would get that out of it wouldn't you
Bowl games are now meaningless.
Why was Georgia in the playoffs their quarterback got hurt remember FSU
We have forgotten what College is for Education , not everyone will make it to the NFL.
And the guys who go to league usually don’t get a degree..
of course, but the reality is that college football is a billion dollar business.
You do a great job JD. I bashed on3 when it first started. I was ignorant, you guys do a great job. Go Bucks🌰🌰
The B1G has no incentive to help the SEC.
The SEC has done nothing but dump on the B1G for 20 years and now yall want a hand out to help you because the playoffs changed? GTFOH.
Player earning potential should be direcrly tied to the number of years they spend at the same university.
If a player wants to transfer every year they can but they would be dropped back down to freshmen earning potential.
To anyone who says it's unfair to the player to place this sort of restriction i say in the real world this is how it works.
You want to work at a specific location for a.specific salary? Well there are expectations from your employer & rules of conduct.
If those in charge had decided to make the players employees of the school and to give them all the benefits of being employees, sure, 100%. But they haven't, and they aren't. Not yet.
The problem is that the NCAA has fought making the players employees for years, so this is where we are. Isn't the players' fault. It's the NCAA and the schools that have created this by trying to have it both ways for so long.
The transfer portal and nil has made a bad on-field product. Last season was a drag. The last thing i want to see is more
NIL will kill this show faster than anything else 🤷🏻♂️and by show I mean college football
So you believe that schools should continue to make billions of children from jersey sales tickets marketing name imagine likeness.. while the kids gets nothing.. because the real stars sometimes don’t grad and go to the league with no degree.. so what did they actually get.. clearly you weren’t a division 1 athlete like myself so you don’t know shit
@ it’s a college not a place to get rich but I guess everyone has forgotten that while millions get poured into athletics and everything else goes to waste
This is what y’all wanted! 🤷🏽♂️
@@boschlosser10I feel like you only said that to brag. You were probably a walk on, not somebody who would’ve actually been paid money.
@@boschlosser10just looked you up, it looks like you were a pretty good wrestler, my bad on that. Wrestlers don’t get paid though
There alot of ideas to fix these issues.. But will always be same issue. Small market vs BIG market. Money has taken over the College landscape.
So it’s fair that the dodgers have now built a powerhouse like the Yankees in the past.. it’s just the way it is
The funny thing is all the same people that said Notre Dame is irrelevant is now the main people talking about Notre Dame. They see how Notre Dame took home 20 million for themselves and not having to share now they big mad😂😂😂. Notre Dame needs to be in a Conference that's not fair. LOL
No one is worried about ND, and they will remain to be irrelevant when it comes to winning a national championship so fans just need to stay use to that ceiling.
@@blackmambaram7034Huh? Just say you don’t watch ball. Notre Dame is an ascendant team clearly. They literally made it to the Natty with a ton of Freshman and Sophomores. They are gonna be perennially good.
Why does Notre Dame need to be in a conference? Just so they have to share money? Lots of people share this opinion, but can't give a good reason other than the money sharing? That, to me, is not enough of a reason.
Really the best two lineman just jumped in the portal
@@boschlosser10just proved you didn’t care about ND all year. They got incredibly injured so they had to put out backups who did just as well as the starters. Yeah, the loss of Coogan and Spondler sucks, but it won’t hurt all too much
Indiana have an easier schedule (ranked 66) than SMU (ranked 57)...but go ahead and pick on SMU.
War Eagle now we coming 2025*26🎉🎉🎉
The portal puts the current best players in the game on the field instead of waiting. This leads to parity which is great
Like Saban said, the rich will get richer.
Stop all automatic bids.
it really doesn't. it will just put the best players on the best teams which are usually the programs with the most money anyway. it actually hurts the smaller schools who capitalize on recruiting/developing great players, they won't be able to go million for million with a top tier program.
I will say this-I am less interested in CFB than I’ve ever been. It was the last bastion where the competition seemed sincere and not a battle between whores. Players deserved to be paid for sure. They’re not under contract. The contracts of most coaches and staff are from the public, they’re government employees. This is a subsidy of a bunch of billionaires developmental league-everyone knows these aren’t student athletes-there are exceptions of course but this has played out badly-for me. Again, glad the young men are finally getting paid. The 2025 Rose Bowl sick out/injury out says it all-Ducks money going to the PAC (1)2 because of contracts exposes what happened to me, pre game injuries in warm up. We watch a fraud. CFB went from pure to whore really quick, or slowly and I just wasn’t that clued in. No problem letting this one go too-I don’t cheer for laundry and for teams the players and the coaches playing don’t care about.
Listening to you if SMU should not be in then ole miss should not be in overrated has never won anything e will never win so Really there’s only three teams in SEC that are good and most years its the same three teams the rest of the conference is bad or terrible
How’s this: scrap the conference championship games and name a conference champ after the regular season.
Play bowl games like we used to, but giving the major bowls to better ranked teams, and crown an AP National Champion like before the BCS.
After that use the final rankings to seed for the playoff. All games played on campus. These guys play for the CFP Championship.
No voting for Champions. That’s why the BCS started in the first place because the AP was way too biased towards the larger markets. Still is.
Top 16 teams in the playoff. Use the final rankings after the conference champions. Then roll all the bowl games into 4 or 8 teams groups so all the left outs get 2-3 more games. So the winner of the Holliday Bowl plays the winner of the Alamo bowl etc etc
More teams not needed. 8 teams, no byes, neutral fields. Seeds based on rankings 1-8.
Kids should be required to stay for a minimum of two years at the school they originally sign with. After that, they can transfer once more until they complete their degree. Then they can transfer as a grad transfer. This yearly option to transfer is silly. You’re going to hurt college football - especially for mid-tier teams who can’t afford to keep star players. How depressing is it when you’re a Washington state fan and your one and only star player decides to leave. That’s what their QB is doing. Why continue to invest in my team when kids are just looking at it as a stepping stone?
Nope. I transferred from a school after a yr. Why force anyone to waste their time/eligibilty. Athletes are students…
@@OhioVworldthen dont allow nil after a transfer until you get to the second year
@@gsterf Why? Why should a student be limited on where he or she chooses to go to school and work?
If they go the collective bargaining route, fine. But then student athletes would gain significant concessions from the schools, and that would almost certainly lead to higher pay for the players at the top 60/85 programs.
Let’s keep it a buck, the money needs to come from the bloated coaching salaries. The money is there for 25m/yr payrolls for the players, maybe higher. It’s the coach’s salaries that have gotten out of control. Half the coaching salaries and that’s an extra 7M at many major schools.
@@OhioVworld it wouldnt limit the student on where to go: itd ensure that they would want to stay loyal to a team and if they didnt they wouldnt get a paycheck out of switching, thats all. the student would be free to go wherever but if its about money itll show. it wont stop transfers at all, only slow down the process so that we dont have the mess that we do now, and smaller schools will still be able to compete because their players wont just leave after a year for money unless they dont actually like the program.
going the employment route would make the ncaa no different than the NFL, and would make other sports professional overnight. everything like paperwork and transfers would be so much harder and players would be back to getting paid under the table again.
no college player should get over 500k for a year of playing and out of transferring for a year. its stupid amounts of money for one player that could be a bust (im an fsu fan, i know the pain) but i also agree that coach salaries are stupid. its made a lot of coaches complacent and the sport is getting ruined in front of our eyes
@ Right, and if there is collective bargaining maybe a student could be loyal while receiving X,Y,Z in return.
If not, nope.
Also you at On3 are making the wrong narrative about the sorry gators being good that is 8-4 team Ty that will be 2-2 coming out of September
Florida is good, and will be good. They may start 2-2, because they play at LSU and at Miami in September, tho I'd bet they win one of those. Wouldn't mean they're not good if they did lose em both, tho.
You're good if you go 8-4 with the schedule they have. It's brutal. 9-3, and you should probably be in the playoff.
@ I don’t think so both on the road against teams with better players and equal or better coaching the will better but they will lose both games
There needs to be a CFB Commissioner that is selected by vote of the conferences.
The NFL doesn't have it's draft and free agency during the playoffs
You also can’t leave another NFL team whenever you want and go join another one
@litedawg exactly
@ litedawg
The NFL has collective bargaining and a player union and a huge split of profits go to players. And they have CONTRACTS.
Let me know when universities sign up for that. Oh wait they stopped that from happening.
They could also make contracts with NIL and transferring and $.
@@jbaker7439 hey doofus, they actually cant do that because it would violate anti trust laws, come back to me when you actually know what youre talking about.
I am and have been a huge college football fan for most of my life. I would watch college football from the first game into the next day when Hawaii was playing a home game. I explain this because this season I found my interest starting to wane after the second round of playoffs and my favorite team was IN the playoffs. While I support the expanded 12, it made the season too long. Expanding the playoffs even more is IMO a bad idea unless they shorten the regular season as well. If the current system can begin to cause a major fan season fatigue, a longer one would likely turn me off even more. The 2024 season NC game teams played 16 games in a single season. That is simply too many games. this isn't the NFL.
The recruiting and portal schedules are what really need addressed, not an even more expansive playoff schedule. Also spread the playoff games out and don't have them all on a single channel. If other stations are involved, the playoffs as a whole will receive more exposure and promotion.
I just love how during the playoffs before the season ended talked soooooooo much about the playoff format changing next year and BIG & SEC will have autobids……you heard it NON STOP! Now they changing that tune and it’s 2026 and not next year 2025……Brett Y. Big 12 commish shut that down
8 team playoff is plenty. First round is conference championship games.
This presumes any team in any conference championship game ought to be in the playoffs. That shouldn’t necessarily be the case. Even the conference winners can’t simply be automatically in the playoffs.
Boise State as an example. They were a fun team in the 2024 season but they shouldn’t have been in there amongst the strongest teams in the country. They weren’t at the same level as the others. Same goes for SMU. Love seeing the ponies do well but they weren’t of the highest caliber in the playoffs. How to sort it out better? That’s a tough task. Not one I’d want.
8 teams is enough, but it's a lost cause by this point. There's about a 0.0000001% chance they're going to condense the playoff back.
When you sign an nil deal for a school there should be a buyout if that athlete wants to transfer. A contract just like anybody else.
We don’t need more teams. Should have been 8 teams, no bye weeks. There I fixed it.
Nope. 16 teams, no bye weeks. More playoff games are better than more meaningless bowl games. Those teams ranked 9-16 will be playing in a bowl game anyways, just make it in the playoff.
You can't give millions of dollars to children, with no rules, without disastrous consequences.
Base 4. 16 or 8 teams. no byes.
8 teams are all that are needed.
NIL money is 100% at the first school. Use of portal adds a 25% tax; paid to the team the player is leaving.
Eventually nil numbers will even out. The market will figure it out in a few yrs.
Hot take? Shorten the season. Too much product.
If salary caps won't work, why are they so effective in most professional sports.? Those teams are not restricted in facility spending, coaching spending, etc...the things you describe as being major difference makers in college athletics, but there is much more parity on the field. Maybe you impose a salary tax and make it much more expensive to outstanding the other teams but to do nothing the odds on 4 or 6 teams essentially owning championships will not go away. At that point you might as well creat a super conference of the teams that can do more with more and let the teams that can do more with less compete among themselves.
The easiest solution to this is to allow auto bids for every one who makes the conference championship game. The winners gets buy weeks, and the looser play in the first round, then that leave 3 teams at large bids, they don't want to do that because they want more control over auto bids so they can put who they want in the playoffs.
Exactly. I’ve been saying this all season. I think we need MORE qualifiers to take the decision making out of these peoples hands.
Yeah, but a big 12 champion is likely worse than 2-3 in the big or SEC
@ likely worse? That ASU vs Texas Game looked pretty Damn equal to me.
@@JoeMama-cs3te I disagree, Penn state , Indiana offense not good enough, I will say sec is the best conference, but not as wide a margin they like us to believe. I rate beig ten bout same as acc and big 12
@@herudaguru big 10 was better this year, but typically the sec is better
JD, at the end what I heard did not sound like a reason the small school is better off without there being a cap. Perhaps I misheard it
If you give Cornell Kent State or Arkansas State the same kind of money that Ohio State that Alabama Georgia has then they can hire those kind of coaches and developers and they can compete
Those programs shouldn’t be D1A programs, period.
We only need around 80/85 D1A programs .
If you can’t compete, GL at D1aa.
Create the NIT of college football. We don't need more teams in the playoff. If we do add teams, 4 more max so there are no first round byes. I would like to see some reseeding after each round. Oregon having to play OSU as their first game was just wild. Oregon would have beat any other team in the playoff. OSU was the clear best team in the country this year and at the end of the day, the best team in fact, won it all.
Yeah the iphone not having a home button is why i hate them with everything in my body
Disagree on most of your takes...going to 14 teams is dumb....it means some teams continue to get byes and with that an advantage over others. Salary Cap is necessary to stop someone like say Oregon have a sugar daddy that will dump millions into buying players. No one should have that kind of influence. heck now I'm reading NIL for some schools will be close to $40M which is rediculous and let me add allowing an expansion where kids can now play college football for 6-7 years is dumb as well...when a QB is 27 years old and still playing is a joke.
You can say the same thing about clemson.. they wouldn't have made it in without the conference championship..and the Cornells of the world have never completed with Ohio st.... .. what a cap does is help the smaller schools keep more of their players... your take is not bright
They need to put regulations on NIL and penalties on tampering first and foremost. With the playoffs they should have done 8 teams but it's whatever. 1. Fix seeding. 2. Home games run through 2nd round 3. Fixed championship location for national championship with rotating the other big bowls in the semi finals
It’s not tampering if you have an agent this is the Wild West just get used to it till there are real rules in place is what it is
@@brandonlewis9193 what is a negulation? That’s a term I’m unfamiliar with.
@UNKLchannel1 Sorry, I had a case of fat fingers, lol. Regulations*
@ heh heh. I wondered but I also figured it could simply be a term I don’t know and I wanted to learn it if the latter were the case. My fingers are skinny but I use them as if they’re fat, ha ha.🤣
The portal is a nightmare and this is coming from a Miami Hurricanes fan! I can’t blame players for chasing NIL deals but I hate it! I love my Hurricanes and my Hurricanes only! However the players are not loyal to the school they’re playing for! They are in it for the money! If I could capitalize off of my athletic ability I would probably go that route as well. So I can’t blame these players! Only about 1.6% of college football players ever play in the NFL so if a kid can make some significant money in college and hopefully get an education that will improve his life than I don’t blame them!
That’s your culture.. look at my team Michigan.. we lost zero guys you were our core or serious contributors.. we even lost our head coach last year and still kept the core.. so that’s on your school coach and culture to keep guys
@@donaldwhitfield2794 somewhat true. Arch Manning could’ve transferred and started elsewhere but he stayed loyal to Texas because it wasn’t all about the scratch he could gave raked in. Now he’s QB1 at Texas and he’ll be better for being patient and learning along the way. That team at Texas in the 2025 season will likely benefit from his patience.
@@UNKLchannel1 Arch is an exception to the rule out there! I do agree he as well as Texas will benefit from him being patient! But what would it have looked like if Ewers came back for his senior year? Would Arch have sat for a 3rd year? Also I don't think Arch is desperate for money his current NIL deal is worth 3.1 mil and the thought is he'll probably be able to cash in when he goes pro. But no guarantees of course!
No auto bids for playoffs. If you cant make top 12, you shouldn't have a shot for a championship. Limit transfers per player. Cap limits per player not per team. No opt-outs for players in post season, or they get a deduction in nil money.
I think that they should:
1. Play Army/Navy game week 0.
2. Allow 16 playoffs teams
3. Allow 5 top conference ranked teams guaranteed playoffs, but based on ranking
4. Get rid of conference championship games and instead play 1st round playoffs (8 games on Friday/Saturday) on the first weekend in December
5. Play 2nd round on 2nd weekend of December (4 games).
6. Play 3rd round on 3rd weekend of December (2 games).
7. Play Nationals Championship game on January 1st
nah army navy has to stay mid december
I get what you are saying about salary cap , but in no world should you just be able to buy whatever roster you want bc you have more money backing your program.
Salary caps aren’t to help Cornell. They keep things from getting out of control. Didn’t Miami just give Beck 4 million dollars?
Teams need a cap and individual players need a cap
Don't forget duke gave mesh, qb from tulane, 8 million for 2 yrs.
Beck got approx 3.5 million with endorsements making total package around 8-10 million
Athletic said it was just over 3 mil.
They need to put regulations on nil
You can cap revenue sharing. I think title 9 would take a big bite out of that $20M. You can’t cap NIL, it’s illegal.
Fix the portal and players make the same money across the board
"Football schools" need to leave the NCAA and form a "football association" with rules.
Why is this about conferences when not every team participating is not in a conference this whole thing makes no sense id leave conferences ND don’t have to play in a conference nor share money with a conference
Yeah big risk IE Michigan if no conference in 23 you make all the money and in 24 you made zero.. so it has its ups and downs
@ the problem I’m pointing out is I wouldn’t agree with ND playing in the conference playoff and there not in a conference no team should be in a CFP that’s not in a conference plain and simple
Having the top 4 seeds having almost 4 weeks was a terrible decision all four of the top four seats lost. Almost 4 weeks off it’s just too long.
Cornel is richer than OSU. Richer than most schools. They just don't want to spend that money on sports, the Ivies are academic schools.
Bring back the home button lol
It just amazes me how baby people just comment nonsense about videos that are not even what the man said. "There he goes with his SEC bias" like that's not what the man said of anyone would listen rather than projecting. What he said is just logical capitalism. The conferences that generate the majority of the revenue are going to use that point to negotiate for guaranteed playoff spots if and when the playoffs expands. At no point did he say that the SEC was superior or that they are dominant. He did point out that SMU got spanked and that could lead to the committee second guessing putting a team like them in a future playoff scenerio in favor of possibly an SEC team or BIG 10 team but i think that's a pretty common opinion shared by alot of ppl. Im not one of them but ive heard it many times since the SMU game although Tennessee also got their teeth kicked in but i don't think that makes his point irrelevant. Secondly, FSU was the only undefeated power 5 team to miss the CFP in the history of the CFP now that's only 10 what now 11 years sooo it's not a long history but its still a pretty unfair thing to do to 90 other kids because there qb got hurt and to point to the beat down they faced in their bowl game as evidence that they didn't belong is very close minded. They didn't play one half of their starters, i can't imagine those kids gave a care about even being there after being snubbed and even if none of those things were true they went undefeated in what the NCAA wants to call a Power conference. Regardless of weather or not they got the snot kicked out of them they earned the right to be there. Injuries should never prevent a team from being allowed to compete in a game that the entire team earned a right to be in.
The 55 south JD is from cali
Everybody is waiting for Nick Saban to step up and be the commissioner.
Here's my take for what it's worth on Football. Juggle it a little one way or the other:
I KNOW THIS WON'T BE POPULAR WITH SEC AND BIG 10
Hire a Commissioner: Go ahead and Name Nick Saban first one...
Have 8 Board Members: One from each Conference, Commissioner gets deciding vote on any tie votes
Establish rules and regulations on NIL, Portal, Television Rights
Eight Conferences with 16 teams and divide those 8 Conferences into 2 Leagues (4x2)x16= 128 Schools
Each Conference has 2 Divisions
Best Wins in each Division Plays for Conference Title: First Round of Playoffs = 16 Teams
8 Winners goes to round 2, Random Draw on opponents by lottery: Winners to next Round
4 Winners in Semi Finals, Random Draw by Lottery
Remaing Teams play for National Championship
I know SEC and Big 10 wouldn't like this but tough shit. Everybody gets a chance and all the games matter.
Yes, You're Going to get some Shitty Games but, we had some this year
This works on same basic principle as the NFL and you don't hear the fans complaining because all the games matter
JD, SMU looked better than Georgia and Tennessee in the playoffs. That's exactly why you and your peers got shredded over being PERCEIVED as SEC homers because of your use of selective examples. If anything, based on performance, you should have had LESS SEC teams in.
Exactly
Stop it. That's insane. No they didn't.
Ohio St clearly was the best team in the end, rolled the playoffs, beat the Big 10 Champ pretty much the exact same way they beat Tennessee. Are you gonna argue that the Oregon and the Big 10 is overrated because of Oregon's loss? Of course not. Also, Texas from the SEC was the only team that really had a shot at Ohio St.
Georgia lost to the national runner up by 23-10, with a backup qb. Wasn't necessarily close, but was no blowout. SMU, on the other hand, was absolutely blown out, and by the team that was beaten by the team that beat UGA. Penn St/SMU was over midway through the 2nd quarter. So I'm not sure what you're smoking, but please share with the rest of us.
The national championship should be the only game played on a neutral field. As a Ducks fan I honestly believe Ohio State was the best team in the top 12. With that being said why is the first seed team not getting a home game. We need to stop with the bowl games.
12 is more than enough, they need to be seeded by AP rank, Coaches rank, or what ever. But conference championship should have no bearing on it. You can’t be 19 th rank team and get in by winning a championship
😂
I have 2 suggestions for the all mighty ncaa:
1:transfer portal: players cannot transfer until after they’re sophomore year, this ensures buy in from incoming recruits.
2: CFB Playoff: Rank the best teams 1-12 regardless of who they’re conference championship.
The guys in the suits and ties are ruining college football ....
No, schools shouldn’t have any say on how many spots they get. Also AI should pick school schedules so schools don’t pick easy cupcakes every year
Neither of your comments are even relevant. First of all the "schools" aren't dictating spots the conferences are. Logically if your not in the SEC or BIG 10 you want expansion so you have a better shot to make the playoffs. If you had listened, what he said was that the 2 top conferences for revenue are not going to sign off on expanding the playoffs without a guarantee of having x amount of playoff spots. To change the current format all conferences will have to agree on a new expanded format which is where dominating for the past 10 years like the SEC and recently the BIG 10 have gives you the ability to demand playoff spots. To your second point the only games that are scheduled by the schools are non conference games and if you have been paying attention to non conference games in the past 5 years, top 25 match ups are becoming more and more rare because everyone is scheduling cupcakes. When 3/4 of your schedule is generated for you i think having 2 or 3 "preseason" games against cupcakes is actually pretty reasonable. I think you're gonna see teams move to full conference schedules in the next 10 years with these 16 team super conferences
A team should have to have at least one win over a top 30 rated team and 2 wins over top 55 rated teams to even be considered for the playoffs.
Playoffs did not live up to expectations. 2 teams that ended up in national championship did not play in conference championship games. So how are they the best team in the nation when they couldn't even win their own conference. We're going to lose fans in college football if we don't change the playoffs and fix the portal .
Look at the NFL teams don't win their conference and still make the super bowl
1 transfer.
Josh pate for comish
Money changes people, and more times than not, that's not a good thing. I want players on my team who are there because they love the school and they love the game, not because their mama needs a new house, and they want a $75,000 car. IMO paying a teenage football player multiple thousands or even millions of dollars is way out of line, on so many different levels. If that's what we're going to do, why not eliminate the middleman and take college out of the equation. All these wealthy teams will just be football factories where they get kids ready to play in the NFL. Hell, after making multiple millions of dollars over the course of 3 or 4 years, many would probably choose to forgo the NFL and retire from football at age 22 or 23. We're creating a greater financial divide between the classes. I don't think it's good for college football and I don't think it's good for the country. I believe NIL must be capped and the cap should be a reasonable figure for a kid of 18. What does it do to a kid who works a part time job, making minimum wage one day to having a million bucks in his pocket the next? I don't know. I could go on and on with questions and thoughts and ideas about all this and maybe never come to the right conclusion. But someone needs to ask all these questions and consider all the scenarios and come up with some commonsense rules for NIL and revenue sharing in college football. If they don't get a handle on this; I think it will ultimately ruin the game and ruin lives. I could go on another rant about the transfer portal, but I won't, this time.