Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic vs Galaxy Watch 5 Pro | Fitness Tech Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
  • In this review, we compare the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, two of the most popular fitness watches on the market both by Samsung. We'll take a look at the differences between the two watches, as well as how they're suited for different types of workouts.
    Product Links:
    Galaxy Watch 6 : howl.me/cke5iwQNm6l
    Galaxy Watch 6 Classic : howl.me/cke5jduLAVP
    Galaxy Watch 5 Pro : howl.me/cjrlfc0XV80
    Bands:
    strapsco.com/product-category...
    Related videos :
    Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic Review:
    • Samsung Galaxy Watch 6...
    Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 vs Galaxy Watch 6 Classic
    • Samsung Galaxy Watch 6...
    10 Features of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
    • 10 Features of the Sam...
    Galaxy Watch 5 Pro Review :
    • Samsung Galaxy Watch 5...
    #galaxywatch6 #galaxywatch6classicvs5pro #6classicvs5pro
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @chrishyde1216
    @chrishyde1216 3 місяці тому +4

    43mm 6 Classic has a 33.0mm screen = 10mm surround or 0.77 ratio. 5 Pro has a 45mm body and 35.5mm screen = 9.5mm surround or 0.79 ratio. So 5 Pro has a better body:screen ratio than 43 mm 6 Classic. The ratio is better on the 47mm 6 Classic at 0.81 but it's 28% heavier than the 5 Pro.

  • @TheEndtime60
    @TheEndtime60 4 місяці тому +3

    Why doesn't anybody in their reviews of these two watches and the difference is ever bring up the fact that the Galaxy watch 5 pro has the track back feature which the six classic does not?

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  4 місяці тому

      Solid point. To be honest I haven't heard to much interest in that functionality in general, but it is good to point out

  • @Revoku
    @Revoku 4 місяці тому +1

    I was under the impression the 5 pro has the ECG afib stuff aswell now

  • @mohammadadi5580
    @mohammadadi5580 3 місяці тому

    Thanks bro

  • @arozzell81
    @arozzell81 6 місяців тому +3

    Great points.
    I am currently comparing both my 5Pro and 6Classic. I did miss the bezel and am frustrated with capacitive touch lag on the 5Pro.

  • @takisxatzivasileiou5790
    @takisxatzivasileiou5790 2 місяці тому +2

    The galaxy watch 6 clasic does it has track back???

  • @mikmess6129
    @mikmess6129 6 місяців тому

    Question is this waych better than galaxy watch 5 pro
    The waych 5 pro didnt have barometer compass or altemeter unless you buy the expeneive app

  • @DisentDesign
    @DisentDesign 5 місяців тому +1

    im used to charging my 5 year old fitbit versa once a week...now its finally starting to die its time to upgrade but no way im charging a watch everyday like a chump, i want my sleep score.

  • @salswian30
    @salswian30 9 місяців тому +14

    I have galaxy watch 5 pro it's the best

  • @jennifercuellar4574
    @jennifercuellar4574 Місяць тому

    If only the Galaxy 6 classic had track back, its a great feature that i use often.

    • @kurakuson
      @kurakuson 2 дні тому +1

      If only the Galaxy 6 classic had a larger battery.

  • @pt020
    @pt020 9 місяців тому +3

    Ridiculous, my Galaxy watch 1 still has 4 days battery and even in my older S3 is still good for 3 days.

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  9 місяців тому +1

      I never had the watch 1 but I did have a S3 and I never got 3 days out of it

    • @pt020
      @pt020 9 місяців тому +1

      @@FitnessWithFrost I still use them both, I do not use face always on.. saves battery.
      I had smartwatchs from the First Sony Ericsson MBW100 20 years ago, they could work a week but did not have a lcd display.
      The 2 I use now make a week and even that the S3 is already 6 years old the battery is still as new.
      They are so good that it does not push me to buy a new one.

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  9 місяців тому

      That's awesome I'm glad it's working so well even with the always on display. If it's not broke don't fix it

    • @SigalDa
      @SigalDa 6 місяців тому +1

      Because it's was with older program now its Google wear os which much more demanding on the battery

    • @mikmess6129
      @mikmess6129 6 місяців тому

      Agree owned 5pro didn't like batt life acted 6 hours

  • @feuerherz007
    @feuerherz007 9 місяців тому +1

    i love how you got so many stuff wrong and edited the text in xD
    Anyhow watch 6 classic wins due to rotating bezel 🤭

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  9 місяців тому

      Lol I think I might have been a bit delirious when filming

    • @HenPapirman
      @HenPapirman 9 місяців тому +2

      Get the 4 then... same tech.

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  9 місяців тому

      Yes and no. There are a fair amount difference between the 4 and 6

    • @HenPapirman
      @HenPapirman 9 місяців тому

      @@FitnessWithFrost As long as the sensors are the same - aka - inaccuracy, it doesn't worth getting the 6. Exynos 930 is fine, but not as fast. Some videos show the 5 against the 6 and it's not that fast, in some cases the 5 is faster than the 6 (even the good ol GW3 was fast at one point).

    • @FitnessWithFrost
      @FitnessWithFrost  9 місяців тому +1

      It's more along the lines of the battery and charging that you are going to see the difference. And don't forgot about the bigger and brighter screen. You will see that difference as well

  • @rahuldwevedi5063
    @rahuldwevedi5063 3 місяці тому

    But bro you yourself are wearing the best smartwatch with no display 😅 the one that legend virat kohli wears in india