Does FARFA Know BURNING ABYSS Rulings? | Yu-Gi-Oh Ruling Quiz

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 355

  • @zurreal8087
    @zurreal8087 3 роки тому +351

    Crazy how Farfa’s parents named him after Nadir servant. It’s like they knew he would become an influential enough yugituber to eventually have a card named after himself in turn.

  • @rashomon569
    @rashomon569 3 роки тому +235

    Don't worry, guys. As long as it's not in a duel situation, farfa will read the card as a duelist should be.

  • @justinarnold2020
    @justinarnold2020 3 роки тому +143

    As my knowledge of card effects and interactions increases, my Burning hatred of the Yu-Gi-Oh Damage Step is reinforced time and time again. Thank you Coder.

    • @keinkanal7382
      @keinkanal7382 3 роки тому +11

      Damage step centric archetype when konami

    • @TR-qf2gt
      @TR-qf2gt 3 роки тому +12

      @@keinkanal7382 only for the biggest of brains archetype

    • @JohnSmith-uf9mu
      @JohnSmith-uf9mu 2 роки тому +1

      @@keinkanal7382 looks at War rocks

    • @SpyderByte2099
      @SpyderByte2099 5 місяців тому

      @@keinkanal7382 this has aged well with Tenpai

    • @keinkanal7382
      @keinkanal7382 5 місяців тому

      @@SpyderByte2099 I mean it is a battlephase centric archetype, but not specifically t he damage step. same with warrocks not being damage step centric

  • @adrilak
    @adrilak 3 роки тому +198

    Basically, cards remember game mechanics but not conditions. Niceee

    • @PurePainnn
      @PurePainnn 3 роки тому +52

      Cards remember but players don't

    • @snowboundwhale6860
      @snowboundwhale6860 3 роки тому +19

      @@PurePainnn Add a what in front of that and you've got a killer clickbait title

    • @PurePainnn
      @PurePainnn 3 роки тому

      @@snowboundwhale6860 Hahsjags most def

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 3 роки тому

      It is interesting too that the fact say, Farfa banished Reincarnated Sunlight Wolf, it is no longer considered as being Reincarnated anymore when it returns

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 2 роки тому

      Yup, a core conceit thats needed for the ruling that you can't SS monsters sent to the GY without being properly summoned, if a GY/Banished monster can't retain the fact it was summoned by its own rules, you can't make a rule about not being allowed to if you didn't

  • @puebloaye7628
    @puebloaye7628 3 роки тому +221

    Coder was like a supportive teacher trying to encourage a frustrated student on question number 6 lol

    • @Mike-dw8wf
      @Mike-dw8wf 3 роки тому +7

      only said student's answer for everything is "normal tour guide, activate?"

  • @deanoor9391
    @deanoor9391 3 роки тому +547

    SwagKage doesn't even do yugioh on his channel but still has the highest score out of the yugioh UA-camrs who've entered the event lol wild

    • @michael_betts
      @michael_betts 3 роки тому +105

      It's not like every person gets equally hard rulings though.

    • @ryuhayabusa6651
      @ryuhayabusa6651 3 роки тому +3

      Ye its crazy. Bit dissappointed

    • @germchang
      @germchang 3 роки тому +17

      I mean he's a judge though

    • @deproissant
      @deproissant 3 роки тому +75

      SwagKage's questions were low-hanging fruits though. People should treat his result and that of actual players like they do in Top Gear's Celebrity in a Reasonably-Priced Car: have 2 different leaderboards, one for usual celebrities and another for actual F1 drivers.

    • @jm0112
      @jm0112 3 роки тому +21

      Are you referring to the yugituber roobindale?

  • @estebanmora6263
    @estebanmora6263 3 роки тому +62

    Didn't think you can top " Know your rulings " but this show is a great example on how any person no matter how knowledgeable of the game can make rulings mistakes in the archetype they love the most. Brilliant!

  • @Nopenguinyt
    @Nopenguinyt 3 роки тому +30

    I love how chat explodes with "HOWEVER" constantly

  • @elandrew1513
    @elandrew1513 3 роки тому +82

    I love how Sam is the precedent for the lowest standard XD

    • @warriorofgod2700
      @warriorofgod2700 3 роки тому +6

      No one should be surprised by that either lol

    • @zeo4481
      @zeo4481 3 роки тому +4

      Farfa should have 2 points but CODER cheated his rules so WHATEV

  • @deproissant
    @deproissant 3 роки тому +36

    You really, REALLY need to make a video on what a card does and doesn't remember.
    Also, hopefully Tombox can have a go at this. Let's see you bringing all the big guns.

  • @dragospaul-andrei6264
    @dragospaul-andrei6264 3 роки тому +63

    We need N3sh with Virtual World. But I believe he's a judge too. You've gotta set it up to where he has to get 8/8 to pass :))

    • @florianfercsak5186
      @florianfercsak5186 3 роки тому +2

      Why not dragon link?

    • @dragospaul-andrei6264
      @dragospaul-andrei6264 3 роки тому +8

      @@florianfercsak5186 Well, I believe N3sh is more widely known for VW ever since he made those combo spreadsheets. Coder could have other names for DLink anyways, like Gabriel Netz

    • @florianfercsak5186
      @florianfercsak5186 3 роки тому

      @@dragospaul-andrei6264 Fair enaugh. I personally know him for his dlink stuff pre and post elpy ban.

    • @mohammedhussain6749
      @mohammedhussain6749 3 роки тому +1

      N3sh wouldn’t get views and growth distant coder is trying to get from this series

    • @dragospaul-andrei6264
      @dragospaul-andrei6264 3 роки тому

      @@mohammedhussain6749 How so? I thought he's well enough known from DB Grinder's channel, so it would help to bring his viewers around.

  • @ChazBlanks
    @ChazBlanks 3 роки тому +80

    This series shows that Yu-Gi-Oh isn't beginner friendly. It's easy to get in and play, but you must read your cards and understand wording and interactions.

    • @lazarus4465
      @lazarus4465 3 роки тому +9

      i mean, you are partially true, if you're playing meta you basically learn all the interactions just by playing or talking to other players. also, when i play a deck, i try to understand and learn every interactions with the meta, even if i'm not playing a meta deck.

    • @ag4640
      @ag4640 3 роки тому +16

      This also shows why Yugioh isn't really a children's card game

    • @幽霊船-o4h
      @幽霊船-o4h 3 роки тому +1

      @@ag4640 no one ever said its a childrens game? Atleast konami never said that

    • @ag4640
      @ag4640 3 роки тому +16

      @@幽霊船-o4h Bro, literally everyone say that

    • @john1691
      @john1691 3 роки тому +3

      The quote"easy to learn, hard to master" definitely checks out.

  • @aka_Ingmar
    @aka_Ingmar 3 роки тому +61

    Good lord, this was one of the hardest by far

    • @Tony-hn8qy
      @Tony-hn8qy 3 роки тому +1

      Not really. The questions were easy. Farfa is a smoothbrain so this result was to be expected.

    • @Harmonic14
      @Harmonic14 3 роки тому +44

      @@Tony-hn8qy Nah, these were definitely harder than most of the other videos.

    • @xxmegagallade47
      @xxmegagallade47 3 роки тому +26

      @@Tony-hn8qy when the judge expects a program to get a ruling wrong I’d assume it is a difficult ruling

    • @JohnnyVasquez8
      @JohnnyVasquez8 3 роки тому

      Agreed. And I think it’s because a lot of people hold a Farfa to a high standard when it comes to dueling and rulings. I did appreciate Farfa thinking out loud and walking us through his thought process before answering.

  • @slaerdnkiev9520
    @slaerdnkiev9520 3 роки тому +62

    Seeing the latest episode of Prog, you have to get Cimo on Blackwings eventually :)

    • @nigamnation
      @nigamnation 3 роки тому +2

      Cimo is ghosting coder apparently

    • @Local_stranger889
      @Local_stranger889 3 роки тому +9

      @@nigamnation i did not know that,why is he ghosted?

    • @thanatosxmesiah
      @thanatosxmesiah 3 роки тому +2

      Cimo ignored most other yugituber except the one he work together with i hear, even mbt isn't that close outside of their duel video discussion

    • @Rypio_39
      @Rypio_39 3 роки тому +6

      @@thanatosxmesiah What are you talking about, they met in rl several times and went to events together

    • @thanatosxmesiah
      @thanatosxmesiah 3 роки тому +1

      @@Rypio_39 first time i hear that, what event did they went together? As far as i hear cimo haven't even played rl yugioh for quite a while

  • @dayonik
    @dayonik 3 роки тому +18

    18:48 Best Yugioh joke I’ve heard.

  • @versutus2699
    @versutus2699 3 роки тому +8

    Love this series so much Coder. Maybe a dragon link/rokket rulings quiz with Shunping Xu?
    Or a HERO rulings quiz with Jaden BR or any other prominent HERO pros/yugitubers

  • @SilverHyozanryu
    @SilverHyozanryu 3 роки тому +8

    A few of these were less BA rullings and more how do cards work when set/banished rullings etc lol.

  • @timaeus22222
    @timaeus22222 3 роки тому +5

    6:33 - I've literally run into that exact scenario before in Duel Links, but Good and Evil was Shiranui Spectralsword, and Barbar was Shiranui Shogunsaga's on-summon effect. :-) Leanchoilia was the GY effect of Shogunsaga after being destroyed by Divine Wrath :-)

    • @JohnnyVasquez8
      @JohnnyVasquez8 3 роки тому

      I love that duel links resolves things for you. I’m pretty sure Master Duel will have all of that too.

    • @timaeus22222
      @timaeus22222 3 роки тому

      @@JohnnyVasquez8 tbh I try to predict the result before it happens but sure. :-) Let us choose chain links in Master Duel plz. :D

  • @Shykar0
    @Shykar0 3 роки тому +5

    what i very enjoyed with farfa was that he completly talked us through his thought process

  • @mordefoker
    @mordefoker 3 роки тому +23

    Finally Farfa, your time has come!!

  • @SoraBell
    @SoraBell 3 роки тому +9

    Trif and Farfa easily got the hardest questions

  • @unchainedabomination7228
    @unchainedabomination7228 3 роки тому +6

    If I ever had to do this, I'd do my entire thought process, thinking really hard and seeing if things make sense then when I'm 100% confident in my answer, I'll pick the opposite one 😂

  • @roguewarrior8187
    @roguewarrior8187 3 роки тому +16

    “How are you?”
    “Nervous”
    Bursts into idiotic laughter???

    • @somerandomweeb4836
      @somerandomweeb4836 3 роки тому +4

      Farfa in a nutshell

    • @Tony-hn8qy
      @Tony-hn8qy 3 роки тому +3

      That's how Farfa is. We all know he's an absolute idiot with a room temperature IQ, but we still tolerate him regardless.

    • @roguewarrior8187
      @roguewarrior8187 3 роки тому +2

      @@Tony-hn8qy i was talking about coder but ok xd

  • @0scarWalsh
    @0scarWalsh 3 роки тому +24

    This is all very informative, but someone please tell me why the BA no die???

    • @Noah-hz9cx
      @Noah-hz9cx 3 роки тому +5

      Cause Konami said so :)

    • @0scarWalsh
      @0scarWalsh 3 роки тому +1

      @@hivestalker bro it's a funny, not that deep

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 3 роки тому +1

      There is ruling with Beatrice and BA so basically I wanna conclude that continuous effect of monster stop to check during start of damage calculation until it ends then it checks again or delayed continuous effect checking, that applies to say, flipped BA monsters

  • @ThePrototype1231
    @ThePrototype1231 3 роки тому +2

    Utopia, Impostor of the Burning Abyss

  • @CallMeNevermore
    @CallMeNevermore 3 роки тому +7

    Compared to Swagkage's and dzeeff's rulings videos, this one was unfair.

  • @TheDonJuan
    @TheDonJuan 3 роки тому +9

    Does Don Juan know Dino rulings, short answer no.

  • @nuzilloyd
    @nuzilloyd 3 роки тому +2

    "Male branch of the burning abyss" 🤣🤣 I like that pronunciation

  • @hrocxvid
    @hrocxvid 3 роки тому +5

    Thomas Rose would have been interesting to see do the rulings for BA but regardless, Farfa was a good pick

  • @Mike-dw8wf
    @Mike-dw8wf 3 роки тому +2

    why was i expecting all of his answers to be "normal summon tour guide, activate effect?"

  • @imeverywhere629
    @imeverywhere629 3 роки тому +2

    Been asking for this video for like a month. Nice.

  • @nemesis-t3ddi
    @nemesis-t3ddi 3 роки тому +6

    My question is: when are you ever going to activate book of moon on a Beatrice, then activate book of taiyou afterwards?

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 3 роки тому

      Most likely never or even it ever happen most likely Book of Eclipse

  • @ds703
    @ds703 3 роки тому +32

    I want to see if Robbie MKOHL40 Kohl knows Zodiac rulings :)

  • @babrad
    @babrad 3 роки тому +8

    We need some kind of leaderboard with everyone that played already (and funny chibi faces)

  • @prototypesoup1685
    @prototypesoup1685 3 роки тому

    When becoming a Judge, I must say, I LOOOOVE damage step questions. That is what catches so many players, especially in series such as these, and Farfa was faced with so many! lol. I am honestly very entertained!

  • @CeruleanJake
    @CeruleanJake 3 роки тому +22

    I think at this point, we need to let Sam get a second chance since he has become the mark for people to pass. Let him do Dino or Hero rulings.

  • @alicetheaxolotl
    @alicetheaxolotl 2 роки тому

    Ngl, I wouldn't have gotten the Good & Evil question if it weren't for Master Duel Solo missions.
    In the Shiranui tutorial duel, it walks you through how to play the deck, and it has you discard Spectralsword, banish it, return it to GY, then banish Spectralsword to Synchro Summon

  • @ClassicDura
    @ClassicDura 3 роки тому +3

    This is the hardest one so far my god

  • @LimiterRemoval
    @LimiterRemoval 3 роки тому +2

    MBT--> Heroes
    Yacine656 --> Cyber Dragon
    Ryan Yu --> Sky Striker
    DinoChad --> Dinos
    Cimoooo --> ???
    (I know we already had CyberDragons but what does Sam know compared to Yacine ^^)

  • @izaiahsundquist6877
    @izaiahsundquist6877 3 роки тому +1

    If Farfa were in charge of this, he'd make himself do Inferinty or Evilswarm for the memes.

  • @tylergiles6801
    @tylergiles6801 3 роки тому +2

    You should ask The Don Juan about Dinosaur rulings

  • @marcopereira1735
    @marcopereira1735 2 роки тому

    Regarding the 4th questions: It mentions, that face down monster don't remember where they are from. Did this apply differently in master rule 4 when a (non-link) extradeck monster was face down in a extra monster zone? Once I got f'ed on a tournament for that when trying to fuse from deck. At least the judges where unsure about it and made funny faces after I explained, that it is not possible for a non-extradeck monster to be in the extra monster zone. But still ruled against me.

  • @jisuseee
    @jisuseee 3 роки тому +4

    When is someone gonna test Coder on Unchained rulings? KEKW

  • @maxthebear7765
    @maxthebear7765 2 роки тому +1

    Here’s a good question: WHY THE BA NO DIE?!

  • @owenscott4206
    @owenscott4206 3 роки тому +2

    20:47 Can someone explain why this is? Dante says "If this card attacks" and will only be able to activate if it reached the damage step in the attack, but something like U.A. Mighty Slugger also says "If this card attacks" and it stops things like Mirror Force from activating even though it activates on attack declaration (before the Damage Step occurs). Does it have something to do with Slugger's effect being continuous?

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 3 роки тому

      Someone say in other comment that there are similar ruling to Koaki monster back then; it may be applied to this one too
      It is also BKSS, there is BA ruling with Beatrice too that says it checks its continuous effect again, say, after being flipped face-up, after damage calculation instead of entire time

    • @NovatoEx
      @NovatoEx 3 роки тому

      I think It has to be like that, Dante's effects triggers when It battles succesfully and Mighty Slugger's effect because is continuous protects you during the whole proccess of "attacking".

    • @owenscott4206
      @owenscott4206 3 роки тому

      @@NovatoEx Oh thanks, this makes sense

    • @NovatoEx
      @NovatoEx 3 роки тому

      @@owenscott4206 Your welcome

    • @NovatoEx
      @NovatoEx 3 роки тому

      @@owenscott4206 By the way, do you know how Slugger and Hayate would interact with a raye en the GY when i destroy the Hayate by Battle?
      Because know I am not sure when does the raye acticatd

  • @astercat49
    @astercat49 3 роки тому +5

    To be fair, you would most likely never run into these. I mean, who the hell plays book of taiyou, or Utopia?

  • @Deluf
    @Deluf 3 роки тому +1

    Gabriel Soussi with salamangreat !

  • @MargudnRoboter
    @MargudnRoboter 3 роки тому +1

    We should give the scores names based on Yugioh cards like One for One, twin twister etc

  • @GranMaj
    @GranMaj 3 роки тому

    The one we were waiting. Funny man on Yugioh ruling.

  • @arcvigaming8198
    @arcvigaming8198 3 роки тому +1

    Coder basically answered that endphase question for him lol

  • @Sp0okeh
    @Sp0okeh 3 роки тому

    24:40
    waitwaitwait a second!!! ok now i need a concrete explanation with qliphort monsters with cyber dragon. because the wording with Fortress Dragon and Cherubini is effectively the same thing.

  • @luisruelas5037
    @luisruelas5037 Рік тому

    1. For Cir effect to destroy it, the other monster should be Normal Summoned correctly, and when it is normal summoned correctly, Cir doesn't go to the graveyard because of Rhino's protection. (Correct)
    2. It will remember it was special summoned, and the mechanic it used. It can't use its second effect. (Incorrect)
    3. If it was banished temporarily, no, but it was banished banished, so yes, you can use it. (Correct)
    4. Yes, banished temporarily remember the method of invocation. (Correct)
    5. No, continuous effect are not applied during the damage calculation. (Correct)
    6. Yes you can. Yes you have to discard. (Incorrect)
    7. Yes it is changed to defense position. Yes you can summon Zeus (Incorrect)
    8. The pendumul goes to grave. (Incorrect)

  • @renesandoval4028
    @renesandoval4028 3 роки тому +2

    I have a question about a ruling concerning super polymerization vs de-fusion. If I have a Predaplant Verte Anaconda and a Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon face up on my side of the field with a set de-fusion, and my opponent activates super polymerization using both my dragoon and verte to make a starving venom on resolution of the super poly I chain de-fusion will I be able to bring back my dragoon and verte to my side of the field?

    • @overthemoon34
      @overthemoon34 3 роки тому +1

      Yes, it will go back to your field as that's where the materials were used.

    • @renesandoval4028
      @renesandoval4028 3 роки тому

      @@overthemoon34 thanks!

    • @jofx4051
      @jofx4051 3 роки тому

      @@renesandoval4028 It is NO, cause 2 DARK monster on the field is not longer consider same monster in GY
      Yugioh Fandom - De-Fusion Ruling
      Suppose "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" was Fusion Summoned using "Predaplant Drosophyllum Hydra" and "Predaplant Chlamydosundew" as Fusion Materials. If you activate "De-Fusion" by targeting "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon", "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" is returned to the Extra Deck. In that case, even if the "Predaplant Drosophyllum Hydra" and "Predaplant Chlamydosundew" that were used as Fusion Materials are in your Graveyard, since the monsters in the Graveyard are not treated as monsters on the field, the Fusion Materials of "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" (2 DARK monsters on the field, except Tokens) are not considered to be in your Graveyard. Therefore, the resolution of "then, if all the Fusion Materials that were used for its Fusion Summon are in your Graveyard, you can Special Summon all of them." cannot be applied.

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 2 роки тому

      @@jofx4051 This is the stupidest goddamn clause and I fucking hate it, but its technically accurate, it just makes me grumpy that thats a valid fucking reason that a material stops being qualified as the material used, like I know that shit applies for say, Fusion Summons involving a Hex Sealed or E Hero Prisma, but this one is the silliest thing that feels like someone messed up the conditions and it shoulda been written like "Two DARK monsters, the Fusion Material for this card's Fusion summon must be on the Field"

  • @amateurwriter0223
    @amateurwriter0223 3 роки тому +1

    Doing one of this with mbt should be fun although not sure what's mbt signature archetype is though... Ruling for jank? For hardleg coder can do rulings for cyrstron

  • @austinh3848
    @austinh3848 3 роки тому +1

    I played when damage step, had 4 sub steps, and you had to activate honest correctly or you died.
    I live for the damage step baby!!!

    • @Goblin_Hands
      @Goblin_Hands 3 роки тому

      Hell yeah, back in the days of DAD, Gladiator Beast and Lightsworn, Honest was best reserved for Damage Calculation, a sub step of Damage Step, even cards like Shrink and Forbidden Chalice/Lance could not be used.
      There were genuine "Honest" wars, if a defender intentionally had an Honest, you could Counter them by playing your Honest before they'd play theirs, but you'd have to wait until the Damage Calculation rather than Damage Step; If you didn't wait they would simply use theirs during Damage Calculation and gain all the ATK, but if you waited you'd have turn player priority to activate your copy first in the Damage Calculation, and because there is only one Damage Calculation chain, they could only react, which means the chain would resolve backwards, they would gain your Monster's ATK first, but yours would gain the Total of that!
      Of course Honest is now only reserved for the Damage Step like it reads on the card, only Injection Fairy Lily and cards that read Damage Calculation can activate as such. I honestly don't know when that occured, or perhaps everyone simply cheated on me with Honest, I mean a guy even tried using a DEF position Necro Gardna with Honest before I caught him when I was new.
      Start Step and Battle Step were not as important then, but sometimes you had stuff like Mirror Force and Magic Cylinder resolving in conjunction.

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 2 роки тому

      @@Goblin_Hands I think it was probably during MR1, Konami probably put out more clear rulings on damage step during that, the PSCT wave, or just importing OCG rulings on Damage Step
      Its still made of 4 parts, its just significantly less crowded on Damage Calc because "damage step" no longer legalizes Damage Calc for whatever reasoning fixed that

  • @mex_I.M
    @mex_I.M 3 роки тому

    Love the Necrodancers music outro

  • @ManuelRiccobono
    @ManuelRiccobono 2 роки тому

    farfa can't remember to read during a duel, but he is fucking able to suppose what a card do, given knowledge.

  • @t-wrexgamer6294
    @t-wrexgamer6294 3 роки тому

    I genuinely laughed way harder than I should’ve at the utopia joke

  • @tehy123
    @tehy123 3 роки тому +3

    farfa finds a way to chet no matter what huh...robbed on number six

  • @nitemarestlk
    @nitemarestlk 3 роки тому +9

    really living the true definition of nadir right now

  • @analoghabits9217
    @analoghabits9217 3 роки тому

    Yugipedia's fusion substitute monster page says they apply on field face-up & face-down, in hand, & in gy, but not in main deck or while banished. So as i understand, if invincibility barrier has banished a synchro, miracle fusion cannot banish muddy mudragon as a named hero whether from field or gy. What about face-up & face-down in extra deck, & do these zone parameters apply to all unclassified effects or just fusion substitute monsters, like does star eater's unclassified summon imperviousness apply while attempting to summon it from the extra deck, & is it affected by invincibility barrier?

  • @DerMotze
    @DerMotze 3 роки тому

    Coder, can you make a video regarding the continues effects and how they work? Would be really cool to get some more insight there

  • @jyzu9870
    @jyzu9870 2 роки тому

    i actually knew the farfa/bean soldier dmg step one because grand mole eff doesn’t activate if it’s attacked while face down 👀

  • @t-wrexgamer6294
    @t-wrexgamer6294 3 роки тому

    The Farfa flip ruling is weird
    This one is stupid but here’s how it goes down
    When a monster is attacked and damage calculation occurs before damage calculation a monster is flipped, it doesn’t have any effect during this time, after damage calculation is done the monster only then gets its effect, it can trigger even in the graveyard at that point

  • @esrohm6460
    @esrohm6460 3 роки тому +2

    So i know a fun know your rulings. what if you ask nux for a collab. would probably funny to see him failing at ruling questions. maybe even a ruling question about your favorite card pole position.

  • @Goose____
    @Goose____ 3 роки тому +1

    MBT with Heroes next? :PauseChamp:

  • @zeppelin9776
    @zeppelin9776 3 роки тому +1

    5heads
    If I declare an attack with "Recital Starling“ on lets say my opponents Blue-eyes White Dragon" and I activate/have activated "Lyrilusc Assembled Nightingale“ which says:
    "Once per turn, during either players turn: You can detach 1XYZ material from this card; until the end of this turn, "Lyrilusc“ monsters you control can not be destroyed by battle or card effects, also you take no battle damage."
    Does my opponent still take the 3000 damage through "Recital Starling's“ effect? It’s effect says:
    "All battle damage you take from battles involving this XYZ summoned card is also inflicted to your opponent.“
    🧐

    • @midjenko
      @midjenko 3 роки тому +1

      Am I missing something about lyrilusc, coz this question has been asked 3 times in the last week.
      If you battle with Recital Starling and Assembled Nightingale has activated its effect this turn, then both Starling and Nightingale apply. Your opponent takes the damage you would've taken here, and the damage you would take is reduced to zero.

    • @zeppelin9776
      @zeppelin9776 3 роки тому +3

      @@midjenko
      Seen contradictory answers and wanted to make sure this is how they interacted as it will be relevant after the release of legendary duelist synchro storm. Appreciate it duelist

    • @midjenko
      @midjenko 3 роки тому +2

      @@zeppelin9776 Fair enough, well this is definitely the right answer. There's a database entry on a similar interaction between the Sanctuary in the Sky and Majesty Hyperion you can reference which effectively solidifies it.

  • @yee9384
    @yee9384 3 роки тому

    I've been waiting for this for so long

  • @SyaoLin213
    @SyaoLin213 3 роки тому

    Not sure if it can be done since dragon rulers are banned and Patrick Hoban has long been out of the competitive scene but I'd like to see him appear answering dragon ruler questions

  • @deshtom
    @deshtom 3 роки тому +26

    Before watching the video: if this doesn’t include the End Phase hand size Graph Cir shenanigans, then I’ll be VERY disappointed in Coder.
    EDIT: I’m very disappointed

    • @Boristien405
      @Boristien405 3 роки тому +9

      It def mentions it. Scarm is a more relevant ruling.

    • @_luc1d1ty_
      @_luc1d1ty_ 3 роки тому +2

      It literally mentions them in the Scarm ruling?

    • @deshtom
      @deshtom 3 роки тому +3

      @@_luc1d1ty_ I meant exactly the Graph Cir End Phase interaction.
      If Graph is discarded and summons Cir while you control a non-BA and Cir is destroyed, Cir cannot activate.

    • @ogeid772
      @ogeid772 3 роки тому

      @@deshtom why not?

    • @U1TR4F0RCE
      @U1TR4F0RCE 3 роки тому +2

      It's possible that in one of their streams farfa was told that exact ruling by coder.

  • @AshBlossomWorshiper
    @AshBlossomWorshiper 3 роки тому

    That's so evil🤣 i actually feel bad for the doubters

  • @whydnt
    @whydnt 3 роки тому

    Monster get flip face down.
    Monster : who am i ??

  • @newbiesama
    @newbiesama 2 роки тому

    so the last question: Does this work because pendulum not going to graveyard is a game mechanic vs something like macro cosmos is a effect? Because You can't maxx C under macro cosmos because you can't sent it to the GY

    • @dajayeway
      @dajayeway 4 місяці тому

      Hi! This just works regardless; the only part that matters is having a card for the effect. You can use this effect under Macro and you can also use Tokens for it (which never have a shot at going to GY).

  • @supershook6050
    @supershook6050 3 роки тому

    hey Coder, I may have missed if you did CyDra rulings but I have a two questions since i've seen these applied weirdly.
    1) Cyber Dragon Sieger: can I activate it's effect in the damage step? I've been under the assumption I can since it is a quick effect that manipulates attack values but someone on DB told me it doesn't count.
    2) Cyber Dragon Infinity: can you summon two Infinity's by the effect of overlaying on Nova? the wording on the card makes it seem like it can't but i've seen people on multiple yugioh platforms summon 2-3 infinity over novas. This one I'm more confused over the first one since im 95% sure sieger applies during Damage Step, but this one is exceptionally confusing to me.
    Apologies if you've clarified this before, I don't always watch every video you or other yugitubers post

    • @Sillimant_
      @Sillimant_ 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/xe04jyFsMaU/v-deo.html

  • @wyattdupre2721
    @wyattdupre2721 3 роки тому +1

    Its so funny how coder has to use Farfas real name so people don't get confused.

  • @greenscalekingdom3143
    @greenscalekingdom3143 2 роки тому

    Wait I have a question. If you used dotscapper for instance, both abilites. Then you banish it with Scrypton to special summon itself from hand then use it as a link material can you use dotscapper all over again, or is it different for once per duel effects?

  • @revitup8877
    @revitup8877 3 роки тому +3

    why no ba die?

  • @roybanderas154
    @roybanderas154 3 роки тому +2

    does cimo know blackwing rulings?

  • @lowkey276
    @lowkey276 Рік тому

    These were by far the hardest question in the serie 😮

  • @klesiorosa1168
    @klesiorosa1168 3 роки тому +1

    Milano dragonmaid rulings next

  • @ge789
    @ge789 3 роки тому

    I’m a little confused about the hand size limit stuff, especially since Dark World Grimore has an effect relying on its user discarding through the hand size limit. I guess it’s just the game state stuff I’m questioning the most though.

    • @hi-i-am-atan
      @hi-i-am-atan 3 роки тому

      think of dark world grimoire's "during the end phase" as clarification text; what it actually triggers off of is the monsters being discarded because of the hand size limit, not just from the timing. it's the same reason why you can trigger cir and graff
      granted, yeah, if you would somehow discard due to the hand size limit outside of the end phase, i'm sure dark world grimoire wouldn't trigger. even then, though, it's still an effect that triggers in response to an event with an additional timing condition, rather than just triggering at a specific timing like scarm

  • @gaminginteriorhd9709
    @gaminginteriorhd9709 3 роки тому

    So speaking of Cherubini, say I use a card that destroys like raigeki and the controller of Cherubini has a phantom knight wings on field and chains it in response to raigeki, would the controller of Cherubini be able to send wings to the grave to protect it or would wings have priority and not allow Cherubini since it would already protected by card effect destruction from wings?

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 2 роки тому

      You can not, Chirubini's effect is a response to Raigeki resolving, not its activation, as its already protected by Wings, Chirubini would not be destroyed, and thus you would not be given the chance to choose to send for a block, as the block is unnecessary

  • @Ironpecker
    @Ironpecker 3 роки тому +1

    UTOPIA HAS A SECOND EFFECT???

  • @alimon2207
    @alimon2207 3 роки тому +3

    10:02 Yugioh Monster mit Alzheimer

  • @evansongood2002
    @evansongood2002 3 роки тому

    Dang BA is the hardest cuz a lot of it had to do with the phase with the most specific rulings and technicalities, the battle phase

  • @caprabetad8195
    @caprabetad8195 3 роки тому

    But if a monster that is temporary banished by farfa remembers where it was summoned from, then why a link monster is not returning in the extra monster zone but can be placed in the main monster zone?

  • @juliusmagwood6909
    @juliusmagwood6909 3 роки тому

    I hope on that list you have
    Calieffect
    Crush cards
    Team cog(Charles)

  • @danizdeman1
    @danizdeman1 3 роки тому

    Can the chart referenced at 8:45 be shared please? Would help us returning players catch up quickly.

  • @OmegaRpg953
    @OmegaRpg953 3 роки тому

    Great vid love this series keep it up

  • @LordEgilYGO
    @LordEgilYGO 3 роки тому

    Iterrupt Resistor question demonstration is wrong, Resistor specifically states ANOTHER defense position monster

  • @alucard4344
    @alucard4344 3 роки тому

    03:19
    I see somebody has watched the sky striker video a little too intently...

  • @fubukiii_i
    @fubukiii_i 3 роки тому

    I would like to see if Logan (from crush cards) knows paleo rulings

  • @silastopole
    @silastopole 3 роки тому +1

    Next time get Cimooo with master peace rulings 🤔😂

  • @funnyvalentine2901
    @funnyvalentine2901 3 роки тому

    So if Farfa had the banish effect worded like Shooting Star Dragon where it special summons the monster banished during the End Phase does that mean Shadoll Fusion can't use monsters from deck?

  • @dexg8600
    @dexg8600 3 роки тому

    These videos are why I decided to sub.

  • @xatuyou8045
    @xatuyou8045 3 роки тому +2

    I would like to see a series where chat/commenters ask you extremely obscure ruling questions and You have to see if you can get them correct. Like for example what happens if you summon a piece of exodia with relay soul and then return it to hand, which would complete the five pieces.

    • @Sasajiro
      @Sasajiro 3 роки тому +1

      I think your opponent wins the duel. Using Performapal Popperup killing you when you complete Exodia as a reference, Exodia's victory condition can not happen until you have resolved all effects that would complete Exodia.

    • @xatuyou8045
      @xatuyou8045 3 роки тому +1

      @@Sasajiro it is a draw. Exodia cannot resolve in the middle of a chain link, but neither effect startsa chain. Both players’ victory conditions have been met like if both players had exodia.

    • @Harmonic14
      @Harmonic14 3 роки тому +4

      No, your opponent wins the duel. Relay Soul's condition is met immediately when Exodia leaves the field.

    • @syrelian
      @syrelian 2 роки тому +1

      @@xatuyou8045 Relay Soul kills you the moment Exodia leaves the board, which is slightly before you would win for possessing all of Exodia, travel time exists in the rules insofar as things leave a place before they arrive at their new destination, rather then it existing in your hand simultaneous with it leaving the board

    • @xatuyou8045
      @xatuyou8045 2 роки тому

      @@syrelian there’s an official ruling saying it’s a draw.

  • @Riruka_Dokugamine
    @Riruka_Dokugamine 3 роки тому

    This honestly makes me wonder if there are ruilings that even / you / don't know Coder. It would be funny to see you do this with a head judge. To make him try and have you get a ruiling wrong haha

    • @Goblin_Hands
      @Goblin_Hands 3 роки тому

      Of course, these are all probably questions he did not know, some more recently than others.

  • @relan9660
    @relan9660 3 роки тому +1

    We need lithium with monarchs

  • @jack7641
    @jack7641 3 роки тому

    I think Sam should get a second shot since he was the first one

  • @Zef98
    @Zef98 3 роки тому

    Let’s get The Column King Shannon here for Mekk knight rulings