Are Birds Modern-Day Dinosaurs? | National Geographic

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • An asteroid strike 66 million years ago devastated the dinosaurs. But today’s birds are proof there were a few survivors.
    ➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSu...
    About National Geographic:
    National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
    Get More National Geographic:
    Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOf...
    Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
    Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTw...
    Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
    Birds are exceptionally diverse, with more than 10,000 known species-all of them the descendants of dinosaurs. Modern birds consist of 247 families and 10,731 species, more than any other vertebrate group except fish. The latest genetic clues and fossil finds suggest that at least three lineages of modern birds arose during the Cretaceous period and survived the mass extinction. These discoveries are helping us better understand how birds evolved and how they’re related to each other, from the tiny hummingbird to the towering ostrich.
    Read more in "These Are the Dinosaurs That Didn't Die"
    on.natgeo.com/...
    Are Birds Modern-Day Dinosaurs? | National Geographic
    • Are Birds Modern-Day D...
    National Geographic
    / natgeo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @NatGeo
    @NatGeo  6 років тому +244

    Birds have certain traits which have lead many scientists to believe they are modern-day dinosaurs. What are your thoughts on dinosaurs being connected to our feathered friends?

    • @sabibarahman7278
      @sabibarahman7278 6 років тому +19

      National Geographic I think some of the species dinosaurs became birds, not all of them.

    • @vukhoi3355
      @vukhoi3355 6 років тому +2

      I thought is 65 million years ago !

    • @Ranstone
      @Ranstone 6 років тому +9

      Avian hip+leg structure lacks mobility compared to dinosaurs. (This is because they had little need, as they can fly.) ((This hip+leg structure is the reason for that iconic avian "waddle"))
      Avian hip+leg structures are less evolved than dinosaurs, lacking certain locomotion, and ther is no advantage for avians to evolve away from the "previous" hip+leg structure of dinosaurs.
      Against what Hollywood tells you, a species cannot "De-evolve" into an earlier state.
      Flight is not seen in most dinosaurs, and the flighted dinosaurs share an extremely distant relative from their non flighted relatives.
      *My conclusion* : No, I can't agree; birds cannot have evolved from dinosaurs. More likely, they both share a near pre-dino-relative that happened to evolve aesthetically similarly.
      And before you laugh, in 1975, if you claimed, within an evolutionary academic circle that a meteor wiped out the dinosaurs, you'd be laughed out of the room.... (Some were)
      1975...
      Ten years later, it was being taught in schools.

    • @cdavis5224
      @cdavis5224 6 років тому +13

      National Geographic birds are a form of coelurosaurian therapod dinosaur.

    • @globin3477
      @globin3477 6 років тому +9

      Kick Saunders
      What about wishbones? only birds and theropods have them; it's very unlikely they evolved twice.

  • @effigytormented
    @effigytormented 3 роки тому +439

    When I was a kid: I really wish dinosaurs were still alive.
    Adult me: I wish dinosaurs would stop pooping on everything I own outside.

    • @AM-nz6pn
      @AM-nz6pn 2 роки тому +52

      Me everyday: Fried Dinosaur MmMmMm

    • @whitegold2960
      @whitegold2960 2 роки тому +37

      @@AM-nz6pn Kentucky Fried Dinosaur

    • @Irongiantman007
      @Irongiantman007 2 роки тому +31

      The disrespect that dinosaurs get nowadays from mammals is like poetic justice

    • @mctavishsoap4218
      @mctavishsoap4218 2 роки тому +4

      😂😂😂😂

    • @Meeeeeee3282
      @Meeeeeee3282 Рік тому

      Ark reference?

  • @iampixel4086
    @iampixel4086 5 років тому +306

    me: goes to museum
    also me: *look at all those chickens*

    • @dhruvnarain3948
      @dhruvnarain3948 4 роки тому +11

      That is the smartest comment I have seen

    • @Andreas_42
      @Andreas_42 4 роки тому +15

      Eating chicken nuggets will never be the same again. 😁

    • @mr.heghog858
      @mr.heghog858 3 роки тому +20

      @@Andreas_42 Dino nuggets

    • @something402
      @something402 3 роки тому +2

      i love this comment

    • @BenitoiteBaTiSi
      @BenitoiteBaTiSi 3 роки тому +7

      *"ancient chickens"*

  • @helium73
    @helium73 5 років тому +570

    If it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck: It's a dinosaur.

  • @safron2442
    @safron2442 6 років тому +542

    Life, uh, finds a way.

    • @jmcsquared18
      @jmcsquared18 6 років тому +10

      😂😂😂 Thank you, that was brilliant.

    • @anubhavsingh986
      @anubhavsingh986 5 років тому +16

      It's a dialogue of jurassic park

    • @titan133760
      @titan133760 5 років тому +6

      Must go faster

    • @LordDirus007
      @LordDirus007 4 роки тому +2

      @@anubhavsingh986 The way it is written. That's a Rick and Morty line

    • @macdrown3892
      @macdrown3892 4 роки тому +2

      Maybe my favorite use of that line.

  • @frilink
    @frilink 4 роки тому +131

    Dad, what happen to dinosaurs?
    Dad: KFC

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 3 роки тому +5

      You mean KFTR (Kentucky Fried Trex) 😂

    • @huletnadof313
      @huletnadof313 7 місяців тому +4

      Don't forget turkey on Thanksgiving, roast duck, fried eggs, and down pillows.

  • @samsfoilcreations9006
    @samsfoilcreations9006 3 роки тому +390

    To say that birds aren’t dinosaurs would be like saying bats aren’t mammals.

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 роки тому +60

      Exactly. I do not get how people do not understand this. Dinosaur is a higher rank and bird is a lower rank which is inside the dinosaur group the same way as the whales being inside the mammal group or as you said, bats in mammals.

    • @devilsstrikegaming8695
      @devilsstrikegaming8695 3 роки тому +8

      @@archive2500 what do u mean by rank ??? Birds were pure therapod Dinosaurs with teeth, Hand claws and a tail 65mill years ago. Evolution happens so quickly.Thats the reason birds look nothing like dinosaurs now. Remember ancestors of modern humans 65mil year ago looked like a Hamster or Rats and used to live underground and look now how fast the evolution had worked on those creature to make them humans. Same goes for Birds. Birds may look different now but they were more like raptors 65mill years ago.

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 роки тому +35

      @@devilsstrikegaming8695 That does not take away that birds are still classified as dinosaurs. If you say that bats and whales are mammals, then you must say that birds are dinosaurs, no matter how long the time span of their evolution to keep the logic consistent. Unless, you are being arbitrary and just having your own definitions yourself.
      This definition of yours basing solely on appearance by the way is more likely paraphyly and polyphyly classification. They are problematic classifications that does not show phylogenetic relationships among different groups and does not allow you to put groups in a written form, AKA taxonomy.

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 роки тому +10

      @@devilsstrikegaming8695 "Ranks" are groups that are designated fixed points in their evolutionary characteristics which are always meant to be monophyletic, meaning it includes of its descendants.
      Once you came out from a group, no matter how long you diverged from it, you are still considered to be a part of that group.
      Birds came from dinosaurs, they are dinosaurs. Dinosaurs came from dinosaurs, they are reptiles.
      Humans came from apes, they are apes. Apes came from mammals, they are apes.
      Whales came from mammals, they are mammals. Mammals came from vertebrates, they are vertebrates.
      Keep the logic consistent.
      All groups come from a larger group (obviously).

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 2 роки тому +1

      To say that people who believed that dinosaurs aren't real are just as stupid as flat-earthers

  • @eduardofreitas8336
    @eduardofreitas8336 5 років тому +204

    Wait wait wait. Archaeopteryx, like all birds, are not RELATED to theropods, they ARE theropods.

    • @ryoushii
      @ryoushii 5 років тому +28

      Eduardo Freitas true, a specific sub branch of theropods, but still theropods.

    • @FA-ft9sq
      @FA-ft9sq 4 роки тому +13

      Yup. It's the limitation of our current taxonomic model.
      There is also a great debate regarding what is considered a fish since some taxonomist sees everything that derived from the early fishes all the way to all surviving tetrapods, including us, as fishes.

    • @djengo77
      @djengo77 3 роки тому +2

      "Wait wait wait. Archaeopteryx, like all birds, are not RELATED to theropods, they ARE theropods."
      LOL
      So theropods are not RELATED to theropods?
      LOL
      LOL

    • @thelordnaevis4946
      @thelordnaevis4946 3 роки тому +5

      @@djengo77 they’re talking about the Archaeopteryx specifically

    • @djengo77
      @djengo77 3 роки тому

      @@thelordnaevis4946
      Um, what (if any) point are you trying to make?

  • @logantrimble006
    @logantrimble006 4 роки тому +79

    Even names like raptor means "bird of prey", thus it even means "killer", and Gallimimus means "bird mimic". Which goes to show that scientists noticed similarities to birds decades ago.

    • @kamrankhan-lj1ng
      @kamrankhan-lj1ng Рік тому +5

      Why would not they.
      Avian dinosaurs looked exactly like birds.

    • @blazingtrs6348
      @blazingtrs6348 Рік тому

      ​@@kamrankhan-lj1ng just with teeth, unmodified sternums, unfused fingers, and longer tails

    • @pierre-samuelroux9364
      @pierre-samuelroux9364 Рік тому

      ​@@kamrankhan-lj1ngbirds ARE avian dinosaurs

    • @Hughjaoses8766
      @Hughjaoses8766 10 місяців тому

      Raptor does not mean bird of prey. It means "reaper"

    • @greatBLT
      @greatBLT 3 місяці тому

      That doesn't look very scary. More like a 6-ft turkey!

  • @eclair6910
    @eclair6910 4 роки тому +43

    It's funny how many people still don't know that birds are dinosaurs.

    • @edwardsinger7644
      @edwardsinger7644 Рік тому +7

      I only just found out last time I went to the museum. Went thirty-one years not knowing.

    • @bunnybird9342
      @bunnybird9342 5 місяців тому +3

      I have so much experience with budgies and lovebirds and. Those things are basically little dinosaurs and anybody who insists birds aren't dinosaurs has never sat down and actually looked at a bird.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 5 місяців тому +1

      Even more people think pterosaurs are flying dinosaurs.

    • @romanr.301
      @romanr.301 4 місяці тому +1

      Well a lot of people were likely taught the (slightly dated) notion that birds are _descended_ from dinosaurs. The conclusion that birds simply _are_ dinosaurs was a more recent consensus that hasn’t fully replaced the view in the popular conscience that birds are merely the descendants of, but different from, the dinosaurs.

    • @bunnybird9342
      @bunnybird9342 4 місяці тому

      @@a-walpatches6460 pterosaurs were a separate group of reptiles and so were plesiosaurs.
      Also not really relevant here but there was one time I got in an argument with some classmates who kept insisting crocodilians are dinosaurs when I kept correcting them saying that they are a separate group of reptiles.

  • @gravixy3499
    @gravixy3499 6 років тому +173

    So I could have a Dino as a pet. 😱

    • @aliens3219
      @aliens3219 6 років тому +9

      NE Kid Productions just be prepared to never sleep in again

    • @almazzagitov9799
      @almazzagitov9799 5 років тому +2

      No. You have not dinosaur, you have their closest relarive, not his descendant.

    • @almazzagitov9799
      @almazzagitov9799 5 років тому +1

      Relative*

    • @rieldex
      @rieldex 5 років тому +23

      Алмаз Загитов no, birds are dinosaurs. the clade dinosauria is the ancestor of tyrannosaurus, triceratops and brontosaurus and all its relatives. thus, birds are dinosaurs, the last lineage of theropods. they evolved directly from dinosaurs, they ARE dinosaurs. you can even look up cretaceous birds. theyre not just “related” to dinosaurs, they are dinos. thats like saying... humans are “related” to mammals.

    • @almazzagitov9799
      @almazzagitov9799 5 років тому

      @@rieldex among the whole history of Maniraptora they had evolved to fly only in Early Cretaceous of China, but even at this time bird already spread in same environment as flying raptors. And after disappearing of raptor-birds, they hadn't appear further. Also, the hypothesis of birds as descendants of dinosaurs is doubtful because of lack of transitional forms. For example, Archaeopteryx already was a bird, and apart some dinosaurs and birds flight was achieved by Enantiornis, that means that flight and bird-like skeleton plan could be a result of convergent evolution

  • @BFKAnthony817
    @BFKAnthony817 5 років тому +198

    I ate a dinosaur for dinner, it was Dee-licious. ;)

  • @musizlover2008
    @musizlover2008 3 роки тому +61

    Its amazing to see how diverse birds are in every environment. Birds that can swim, run, use tools, see in the dark, zoom into their prey, scavenge, imitate any sound, etc. Just think how the first bird species survived the dinosaur extinction and diversify to fill up most of the ecological niches left empty by that world wide catastrophe. We got birds nearly everywhere in the world and they all came from the same ancestors. I mean, look at Australia. The majority of the fauna species there are descended from a common ancestor and in the isolated continent they diversify to fill positions in the ecosystem. Just imagine what the world would have been if birds didn't survive, what kind of animal class would evolve to fill up the empty positions birds left behind?

    • @lemongrab6173
      @lemongrab6173 2 роки тому

      Cerato shamo, and parrot shamo. You’re welcome.

    • @shubhammaurya3671
      @shubhammaurya3671 2 роки тому +2

      After reading your comment, I have another theory why non-avian dino went extinct. Because they all were very much similar to each other. Lack of diversity leads them to extreme competition and may be a steroid or flood was last push they needed to be gone.

    • @lemongrab6173
      @lemongrab6173 2 роки тому +2

      @@shubhammaurya3671 you do realise the massive difference in modern day oxygen levels ? You also do realise all of them evolved to be larger, in contrast to smaller variants of avian dinos which is why they managed to produce the newer generations of avian species. You are in correct competition is not what wiped out the non avians. There wasn’t even anything left be it oxygen levels or sunlight or vegetation for them to compete over to begin with. The only species that survived were the ones capable of Hibernation for long periods and those that were too small to be effected by the sudden drop in sunlight vegetation and oxygen. This is why there will never be any actual dinosaur resurrections.The massive change of the environment will never support their primitive biology. If low oxygen levels don’t kill the replicated specimens the new species of micro organisms will. That’s why it’ll take decades even after we somehow manage to perfect cloning.

    • @pierre-samuelroux9364
      @pierre-samuelroux9364 Рік тому

      ​@@shubhammaurya3671so you just forget dinosaurs were very diverse

    • @romanr.301
      @romanr.301 4 місяці тому

      @@shubhammaurya3671I really don’t think that’s it. The non-avian dinosaurs were certainly NOT lacking in any diversity. It seems pretty simple to me: the birds that survived were those that were smaller (needing less food), had beaks (to eat tough nuts that toothed birds couldn’t reach, and to not rely on prey-based diets that would doom toothed birds post-asteroid), and that could fly (scouring large areas for food very quickly).

  • @PierreAndersson85
    @PierreAndersson85 5 років тому +26

    This is so awesome and i am so happy that at least some dinosaurlineage did in fact survive and now flourishes with 10000 species today.

  • @leehyunsong7001
    @leehyunsong7001 4 роки тому +45

    Dinosaurs never dies off they just become smaller. Tears in my eyes!

    • @syafiqjabar
      @syafiqjabar 2 роки тому +3

      Some actually got as big as a typical Mesozoic theropod, like the terror birds, moa and elephant birds.

    • @sagnik3556
      @sagnik3556 2 роки тому +2

      smol dinos

    • @evenhartwick4422
      @evenhartwick4422 2 роки тому

      dinosaurs to birds are the biggest downgrade in the history of nature. cool you can fly now but you gave up everything that made you the dominate species on the planet

    • @pierre-samuelroux9364
      @pierre-samuelroux9364 Рік тому +3

      Have you heard of ostriches or emus?

  • @LinkMarioSamus
    @LinkMarioSamus 3 роки тому +6

    I can't unsee dinosaurs whenever I look at birds.

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien 3 роки тому +5

      Same. From their claws, to the way they walk, it all screams raptor

    • @LinkMarioSamus
      @LinkMarioSamus 3 роки тому +2

      @@AverageAlien And not the abominations from the Jurassic Park movies thank goodness.

  • @masterplus6002
    @masterplus6002 2 роки тому +21

    Syrinxes aren't "only found in today's quacking water fowl", they are found in many groups of birds.

  • @Javierm0n0
    @Javierm0n0 6 років тому +221

    Remember kids, when u eat a chicken, youre eatin a modern day raptor. Happy feasting!
    (This is a joke)

    • @seanaudio.
      @seanaudio. 6 років тому +18

      Free range dinosaur

    • @quamne
      @quamne 6 років тому +43

      From now on chicken farms will be called jurassic parks

    • @MichaelSHartman
      @MichaelSHartman 6 років тому +6

      So the Jurassic Park raptors going into a kitchen was potentially dangerous for them, or the perfect place for revenge?

    • @sabibarahman7278
      @sabibarahman7278 6 років тому +24

      This is not a joke. It's actually true.

    • @eeeeea
      @eeeeea 6 років тому

      Sabiba Rahman because it's a joke it doesn't mean it's not true.

  • @shoulders-of-giants
    @shoulders-of-giants 6 років тому +38

    short answer: yes

  • @1990Cid
    @1990Cid 6 років тому +37

    Dr. Grant was right.

    • @madheretic4423
      @madheretic4423 6 років тому +9

      I knew someone was gonna say something like that.

    • @Alatreon2435
      @Alatreon2435 4 роки тому

      Always has been

  • @AzlianaLyana
    @AzlianaLyana 6 років тому +148

    Nice information. It's a amazing how even a single species like the iaai can lead to such a diverse number of modern day species. Had it not been for some major events that wiped them out, we'd most likely be living in a whole different landscape right now. Perhaps our own existence would have been different too? Thanks for sharing National Geographic.

    • @7ItalianStallion
      @7ItalianStallion 6 років тому +8

      Azliana Lyana thank you for stating the obvious. Had it not been for you I would probably be reading something useful by now.

    • @jamesveerdog2723
      @jamesveerdog2723 6 років тому +7

      Makes you feel like the events on earth were made for humans doesn’t it

    • @doburu4835
      @doburu4835 5 років тому +8

      @@jamesveerdog2723 meh.

    • @kvarnerinfoTV
      @kvarnerinfoTV 5 років тому +3

      @@jamesveerdog2723 no, as same could be told by ants, viruses, plancton...etc

    • @kvarnerinfoTV
      @kvarnerinfoTV 5 років тому +9

      @@jamesveerdog2723 its like saying after falling on your nose...it seems like that floor was made to hit my nose.

  • @aintkizo
    @aintkizo 3 роки тому +2

    It's all fun and games, til you see a swarm of dinosaurs flying towards you.

  • @diecastworld7962
    @diecastworld7962 3 роки тому +7

    I have three pet parakeets and I am a proud owner of three dinosaurs

  • @thevilkids
    @thevilkids 6 років тому +11

    Amazing...Evolution is just breathtaking

    • @ryoushii
      @ryoushii 5 років тому +3

      SummerWine19 I agree. It’s amazing that an entire group of animals thought completely extinct in fact are still thriving and as diverse as they were over 65 million years ago. This is why I love science, every day something amazing is added to our knowledge of the reality around us.

  • @insipidwallflower565
    @insipidwallflower565 3 роки тому +12

    Recently I’ve gone to a lot of bird stores to find the perfect parrot for me (I’m getting a little Quaker) but I’ve seen so many Macaws this last month. Like 10+ Macaws, and they never fail to amaze me. Everything about them just reminds me of dinosaurs. The way they act especially, but their beak and facial features and expressions too. Beautiful birds but there is something prehistoric about them

  • @welcometothestream8860
    @welcometothestream8860 5 років тому +22

    KFC:
    Kentucky fried carnotaurus

    • @gallopinggopro2302
      @gallopinggopro2302 4 роки тому

      we literally eat the most fascinating and prehistoric animals in the world... carnosaurus... *cries in tiny arms*

  • @alexbowman7582
    @alexbowman7582 3 роки тому +5

    Three things about dinosaurs (probably). 1. Dinosaurs had lighter bird like bones enabling the evolution of the largest ever land animals. 2. Dinosaurs probably had bird like more efficient lungs helping the breathing especially in the largest ever land animals. 3. Dinosaurs probably had bird like brains which have tighter, smaller more efficient neurons making the relative intelligence shown in Jurassic Park a possibility.

  • @McKeelix
    @McKeelix 4 роки тому +4

    Archaeopteryx was not a distant cousin of therapods, nor was it even a close cousin. It literally WAS a therapod. Birds are still therapods.

  • @joebaumgart1146
    @joebaumgart1146 Рік тому +7

    An astroid didn't kill the dinosaurs. Chuck Norris did, and he'll do it again!

  • @Theonetrueerenyeager
    @Theonetrueerenyeager 2 роки тому +13

    Yes, they are. All birds are dinosaurs.

    • @own4801
      @own4801 Рік тому +3

      But not all dinosaurs are birds.

    • @Theonetrueerenyeager
      @Theonetrueerenyeager Рік тому +4

      @@own4801 of course, but I’m referring to the other way around.

  • @sauce.6758
    @sauce.6758 6 років тому +13

    theres a reason why theyre referred to as 'non avian dinosaurs'

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 3 роки тому +5

      Period. More technical, objective, and appropriate term.

  • @ZennExile
    @ZennExile 6 років тому +60

    Is this a question people still need an answer to?
    What kinda derp doesn't know birds came from Avian dinosaurs in 2018?

    • @h.y.4371
      @h.y.4371 6 років тому +51

      gotta remember, there are those that deny dinosaurs' existence, and also those who think the world is flat. welcome to 2018, my friend.

    • @Rainygirl3100
      @Rainygirl3100 6 років тому +22

      Heavily religious people, that's who. You know, the ones who deny every aspect of science simply because they believe in God. And no, I have nothing against religion, plenty of religious people have mixed beliefs or respect scientific views despite their own, but it's usually the SERIOUSLY religious people who refuse to face the facts of fossil/geological records in order to stay faithful to what they know. Personally, I like to think that both creation and evolution happened.

    • @pianoluver1222
      @pianoluver1222 6 років тому +22

      Every freakin day... I teach middle school students (not science, but still) and I have about half of students who are strong evolution deniers because their religious upbringings... very annoying to have a 13 year old shout in the middle of class that you’re wrong and you need Jesus... (it comes up when I teach Greek and Latin roots, because most of those word parts apply to science).

    • @rickkwitkoski1976
      @rickkwitkoski1976 6 років тому +3

      +Elendil - Feel sorry for you bro.

    • @Nannowatts19482
      @Nannowatts19482 5 років тому +11

      @@h.y.4371 There's also the people who don't think you can study dinosaurs because you can't see them, or some bs

  • @bm-ub6zc
    @bm-ub6zc 3 роки тому +6

    i didn't like they make it sound, that to say that birds are dinosaurs, is more like an intellectual scenario kind of thing. this is not just an interesting way of seeing it, like a philosophical question. no, birds are LITERALLY dinosaurs, as an official fact.

  • @Trev0r98
    @Trev0r98 5 років тому +13

    Short answer: Yes. Birds are modern-day dinosaurs. They are "avian dinosaurs" (dinosaurs that fly - and even the ones that don't fly).

    • @nojusy1992
      @nojusy1992 4 роки тому +1

      How about ostriches and emus?

    • @jordangraham-mclean1980
      @jordangraham-mclean1980 4 роки тому +7

      @@nojusy1992 They are flightless avian dinosaurs. Avian just means bird, bird-like or of or relating to birds, it has nothing to do with flight unless in reference to the ability of many birds to do so.

    • @djengo77
      @djengo77 3 роки тому

      LOL @ "Birds are modern-day dinosaurs."
      So, when Darwinists say "Dinosaurs evolved into birds", what you mean is "Dinosaurs evolved into [modern-day dinosaurs]", no?
      Can you give me any examples of dinosaurs evolving into things which you would say are NOT dinosaurs? Or, do dinosaurs evolve exclusively into dinosaurs?
      Which would be more impressive to you? Dinosaurs evolving into dinosaurs, or dinosaurs evolving into non-dinosaurs?

    • @jordangraham-mclean1980
      @jordangraham-mclean1980 3 роки тому +5

      @@djengo77 you’re in the wrong thread champ

    • @Trev0r98
      @Trev0r98 3 роки тому +7

      @@djengo77 Birds were it. Sole survivors of the dinosaur line. Dinosaurs didn't evolve into anything else.

  • @TheChurchHistoryChannel
    @TheChurchHistoryChannel 6 років тому +15

    Bird Up!

  • @jlai8411
    @jlai8411 Рік тому +3

    my tiny birds are probably a raptor back in the days

  • @Jaydencyk
    @Jaydencyk Рік тому +3

    Every day birds fly to my house and I release I have been seeing modern days Dinosaur 😮

  • @seanaudio.
    @seanaudio. 6 років тому +7

    Bird is the word 🐦

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 2 роки тому +1

      Dinos are the words

  • @haitang
    @haitang 6 років тому +2

    Agreed. It makes sense when my parrot lands on my miniature town.

  • @fortnitelvr0
    @fortnitelvr0 6 років тому +6

    Short answer, Yes

  • @willdriskill9530
    @willdriskill9530 3 роки тому +2

    It makes me imagine a dinosaur singing like a songbird in the spring looking for a mate. I wonder how many species we have yet to find.

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 2 роки тому +2

      Scientists concluded that dinos also danced for mating just like modern birds do

  • @dean1039
    @dean1039 4 роки тому +7

    There's something in the eyes of an eagle that remind me of a Velociraptor.

    • @rhthehuman866
      @rhthehuman866 4 роки тому +3

      Because they are modern day raptors.

    • @D0g3yb01
      @D0g3yb01 3 роки тому +1

      @@rhthehuman866 So your telling me raptors can fly?

    • @rhthehuman866
      @rhthehuman866 3 роки тому +1

      @@D0g3yb01 No, they cannot. Raptor just means predatory bird.

  • @huletnadof313
    @huletnadof313 7 місяців тому +1

    Archaeopteryx is not a distant cousin of theropods. It is a theropod. You need to fix that error.

  • @andrewstephen9096
    @andrewstephen9096 2 роки тому +2

    We have just discovered what a real, living dinosaur would have sounded like..... "Quack...quack!!!"

  • @amn2760
    @amn2760 2 роки тому +5

    Dinosaurs didnt went extinct, after the K-Pg extinction, dinos decided to live in a new generation of life on earth by ditching their teeth and tails and developed beaks and feathers

  • @fefek1
    @fefek1 3 роки тому +21

    I wish there was a movie where something like a made up "hidden gene" actives in birds all across earth and they begin growing slightly bigger and acting like real Dinosaurs causing a apocalypse kind of thing.

    • @kojoydesu4107
      @kojoydesu4107 Рік тому

      I have a great suspicion that Dinosaur at the Mesozoic time were actually acting like a bird...

  • @mascot6418
    @mascot6418 6 років тому +4

    I think dinosaurs have been adapted a new way of living as some sorta bird and others.

  • @QuadiePoo
    @QuadiePoo 5 років тому +4

    1:05. What a gorgeous bird!

  • @ksspqf6016
    @ksspqf6016 2 роки тому +2

    I once saw tiny dinosaur footprints in the snow and thought to myself *oh my god what is this* then i realised *oh yes birds are dinosaurs*

  • @psychedeliccarrie5921
    @psychedeliccarrie5921 5 років тому +5

    In a way, it does explain a tiny bit why snake tastes like chicken.

  • @mc12358
    @mc12358 3 роки тому +2

    It's hard to listen to the flight calls of a Great Egret or a Red-shouldered Hawk, or even some calls of various passerines like Northern Mockingbirds and NOT think of what dinosaurs must have sounded like.
    The Pileated Woodpecker in the US even still looks prehistoric, in the best ways possible 🙂

  • @Trentrick_Lamar
    @Trentrick_Lamar 6 років тому +2

    Me in my head: Well, maybe dinosaurs have more in common with present-day birds than they do with reptiles. Look at the pubic bone: turned backward, just like a bird. Look at the vertebrae: full of airsacs and hollows, just like a bird. And even the word 'raptor' means "bird of prey."

    • @StormsandSaugeye
      @StormsandSaugeye 6 років тому +2

      Me out loud: "That doesn't look very scary. It looks more like a 6 foot Turkey"

    • @trvth1s
      @trvth1s 5 років тому +1

      ornithischians didnt have airsacs nor hollow bones, they were more like mammals

  • @xyz-ns7ym
    @xyz-ns7ym 4 роки тому +1

    Yes

  • @alienximmortal11
    @alienximmortal11 Рік тому +2

    I used to think dinosaur was more dominant but no we are

  • @Rainygirl3100
    @Rainygirl3100 6 років тому +21

    I'm surprised I only saw one comment about how "evolution was wrong" in this comment section lol

    • @briantrevino9706
      @briantrevino9706 5 років тому

      Evolution is wrong.

    • @briantrevino9706
      @briantrevino9706 5 років тому

      @Juno Donat YEC

    • @firegator6853
      @firegator6853 4 роки тому +1

      same im happy about that but on the other hand i wanted to make fun of these idiots....
      ooh well i guess knowing the truth is better

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 2 роки тому +2

      @@briantrevino9706 Stop talking to yourself, if evolution was never true then no creatures should exist today not even us

    • @briantrevino9706
      @briantrevino9706 2 роки тому

      @@amn2760 That doesn't make sense or refute young earth creationism. That unfortunately, is an argument that would be true if evolution was true, but does nothing to prove evolution is true. We are designed our universe is designed and there are laws that are in existence. It is not coincidence. That would take more faith than Believing in God.

  • @Karl.Jayce-DE
    @Karl.Jayce-DE 3 місяці тому +1

    Antarctica is hiding so many epic fossils

  • @timur5241
    @timur5241 4 роки тому +2

    Yes they are

  • @user-chardonneret
    @user-chardonneret 6 років тому +2

    Fabulous

  • @bcelebi55
    @bcelebi55 4 роки тому

    One upon a time there was everywhere almost these. But now it had removed 65 million years ago

  • @hamstergodfufurufufu8842
    @hamstergodfufurufufu8842 5 років тому +4

    Kentucky fried dino sounds good right now.

  • @jolus6678
    @jolus6678 Місяць тому +1

    Dinosaur shaped chicken nuggets is solid proof of this

  • @imyou593
    @imyou593 2 роки тому +5

    Kang taemu

  • @mlpdancingonrainbows931
    @mlpdancingonrainbows931 6 років тому +2

    Wow I'm really surprised about every thing just wow.

  • @teawrecks1243
    @teawrecks1243 4 роки тому

    🎵 Denver, the last dinosaur! He's just a bird and nothing more! 🎵

  • @kronniichiwa9909
    @kronniichiwa9909 2 роки тому +7

    Get to the point. The answer is yes.

  • @danag2841
    @danag2841 7 місяців тому

    Now my dinosaur sings September when he wants millet

  • @moditoppokhan5443
    @moditoppokhan5443 10 місяців тому

    Now we don't notice them much but in past they were much noticable

  • @caylya7869
    @caylya7869 Рік тому +2

    Birds are like how humans are still considered ape’s because we evolved from apes. They are also like lemurs and other primates that don’t look like monkeys or apes.

    • @Dr.IanPlect
      @Dr.IanPlect Рік тому

      tripe

    • @caylya7869
      @caylya7869 Рік тому +1

      @@Dr.IanPlect What?

    • @Dr.IanPlect
      @Dr.IanPlect Рік тому

      @@caylya7869 "Birds are like how humans are still considered ape’s because we evolved from apes."
      - no, what a descendant evolved from doesn't necessarily dictate what they are now. In both cases (birds>dinosaurs, humans>apes), they are still regarded as part of the larger group as they have the traits of that group
      - I want to be clear on the distinction. 'Because we evolved from' is the part that fails; we also evolved from lobe-finned fish and are within that group, but we are not lobe-finned fish ourselves, so here is an example where 'because we evolved from' fails. It's the traits we have now that determines grouping and classification
      "They are also like lemurs and other primates that don’t look like monkeys or apes."
      - this is just nonsense; lemurs are neither apes nor monkeys, so the analogy with birds fails completely.

    • @x-foliage-x
      @x-foliage-x 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Dr.IanPlect actually we are lobe finned fish. loser.

  • @Hughjaoses8766
    @Hughjaoses8766 10 місяців тому +2

    They are 100% dinosaurs. They are the same family as dinosaurs, the Archosaurs

    • @Dasple
      @Dasple 10 місяців тому +1

      They're within the dinosaur actually

    • @Dr.Ian-Plect
      @Dr.Ian-Plect 4 місяці тому +1

      @@andrewgonzales6527 "Not all birds are in the Theropod order, which is the order one would have to be in order to be classified as a modern dinosaur."
      You again ,spewing the same tripe
      1. Theropod is not an order, it is member of a group
      2. That group is 'Theropoda, and it is a clade, not an order
      3. All the birds you listed ARE theropods, they ARE in Theropoda
      4. 'Modern dinosaurs' ONLY refers to birds. Birds are the only living dinosaurs, and ALL birds are in the clade Theropoda

  • @sageofsixidiots3364
    @sageofsixidiots3364 3 місяці тому +1

    Saying birds aren't reptiles is like saying whales aren't mammals just Cuz they are morphologically different from the traditional body plan or characteristics of their lineages

  • @dom9300
    @dom9300 6 років тому +2

    Its Cool that my cockatiel was a dinosaur

  • @sammidul4080
    @sammidul4080 6 років тому +21

    so dinosaurus is not exstict after all

    • @cj597
      @cj597 6 років тому +2

      sam midul yes, they are. dinosaurs and birds are not the same species.

    • @GandalfTheTsaagan
      @GandalfTheTsaagan 6 років тому +25

      charlie First, birds (Aves) and Dinosaurs are not species but groups or clades
      Second, birds are theropod saurichians and therefore they are dinosaurs just like how bats and whales are mammals

    • @GandalfTheTsaagan
      @GandalfTheTsaagan 6 років тому +8

      And no, sam, dinosaurs are not extinct

    • @sammidul4080
      @sammidul4080 6 років тому

      and we are descendants of dinosaurus it self, right?

    • @GandalfTheTsaagan
      @GandalfTheTsaagan 6 років тому +7

      sam midul No
      Dinosaurs aren't that old
      The last common ancestor between dinosaurs and mammals was extinct waaaay before the first dinosaurs appeared

  • @cherrybomb8328
    @cherrybomb8328 6 років тому +3

    I used to think that birds evolved from the pterodactyl but no apparently they evolved from the land dinosaurs

    • @tank3143
      @tank3143 5 років тому

      They also evolved from flying ones too like the archeopteryx and the microraptor.

    • @quairym5724
      @quairym5724 4 роки тому

      @@tank3143 Archeopteryx and microraptor didn't fly

    • @waspanimations7037
      @waspanimations7037 4 роки тому

      Pterasaurs had membrane wings

    • @amn2760
      @amn2760 2 роки тому +1

      Pterosaurs aren't birds because they don't have feathers and their feet have 4 fingers while birds have only 3

    • @NoName-hg6cc
      @NoName-hg6cc Рік тому

      Those aren't dinosaurs, those were COUSINS of the dinosaurs birds evolved from

  • @lintyscorpion2692
    @lintyscorpion2692 4 роки тому +2

    that's like saying humans are modern day Neanderthals since we are related to them.

    • @shroomoid9403
      @shroomoid9403 4 роки тому +1

      It's not the same. Humans are related to Neanderthals, but birds literally are avian theropod dinosaurs

  • @forceev6695
    @forceev6695 6 років тому +2

    First. But cool Video it's Basically Instresting to Watch and Listen!

  • @maximumsdecimusceckhladze3173
    @maximumsdecimusceckhladze3173 5 років тому +1

    i own the Budgieragares Rex!

  • @G0die16
    @G0die16 6 років тому +3

    Yes, yes they are

  • @theanuj1980
    @theanuj1980 6 років тому

    Really a gr8 video....
    Keep posting...

  • @truthspeaker5023
    @truthspeaker5023 Рік тому

    The way she pronounced IAAI😍

  • @randomstuffswithrrd
    @randomstuffswithrrd 4 роки тому +3

    I love Birds ❤️❤️❤️
    I hail from a country that has one of the largest avian population in the World: 🇮🇳India

  • @BigBoiRedFrog
    @BigBoiRedFrog Рік тому +2

    Fun fact : Birds are dinosaurs

  • @MasterMayhem78
    @MasterMayhem78 6 років тому +4

    Dr. Grant already told us this. Thanks anyway.

  • @williamjordan8603
    @williamjordan8603 5 років тому +4

    Beaked birds survived because they could feed on seeds, one of the few food sources that survived the mass extinction devastation.

    • @trvth1s
      @trvth1s 5 років тому

      They were also small, pterosaurs had members that ate seeds but late cretaceous, while they were extremely diverse, they had become too specialized and large, smallest pterosaur species we know of was the size of a seagull which is big for an acctive animal.
      All big/medium sized dinosaurs, pterosaurs and mammals died, they needed too much caloric intake. Medium sized crocodilea survived due to their low metabolism and small ccaloric intake.
      Big active animals always die.
      ''The meek shall inherit the Earth'' matthews 5-5

    • @rhthehuman866
      @rhthehuman866 4 роки тому +1

      And the ones that ate the beaked birds, had their face evolve a beak.

    • @Nat.ali.a
      @Nat.ali.a Рік тому

      Does chicken feed on seeds? They straight get animals from the ground

  • @sadafraisa2096
    @sadafraisa2096 3 роки тому

    Dinos and birds are awesome
    💝💝

  • @helium73
    @helium73 5 років тому +4

    So the creationists were right after all. Men and dinosaurs did live at the same time.

    • @SpamCentralStation
      @SpamCentralStation 5 років тому +2

      @helium73 *just wins the Internet for making everyone's head explode in under twenty words!*

    • @waspanimations7037
      @waspanimations7037 4 роки тому

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
      it's the ONLY thing they got right😟

  • @howardmunro5464
    @howardmunro5464 3 роки тому

    Zebras, Ponies, Mules, and Horses were descended from Eohippus, Pliohippus, Mesohippus, And MerriChippus.

  • @AnimalsAndReports
    @AnimalsAndReports 6 років тому +4

    Not a mammal, not a reptile, so what are they?

    • @cj597
      @cj597 6 років тому +1

      AnimalsAndReports the bird is a species in itself, it is not reptile or mammal.

    • @GandalfTheTsaagan
      @GandalfTheTsaagan 6 років тому +10

      charlie "bird" Isn't a species, it's a group

    • @cj597
      @cj597 6 років тому

      Gandalf the Tsaagan group or class, with the bird being neither mammal or reptilian, it’s safe to say the bird is a species, with more than 50 thousand sub species and classifications.

    • @GandalfTheTsaagan
      @GandalfTheTsaagan 6 років тому +3

      charlie Ummm, no
      It's a group of its own, with other groups inside it that ultimately branch into multiple genus with their species
      In the same way that that "mammal" is a group, not a species

    • @cj597
      @cj597 6 років тому

      Gandalf the Tsaagan please look up the definition of species.

  • @ngjimmy338
    @ngjimmy338 29 днів тому

    Oh no

  • @randomderpyfamily4795
    @randomderpyfamily4795 6 років тому +1

    Yes!!!!!

  • @kamishin7135
    @kamishin7135 3 роки тому +1

    Dragons are flying dinosaurs
    Birds are flying dinosaurs
    Birds are dragons

  • @egreeno
    @egreeno 2 роки тому

    Wow. This is so cool when you really think about it.

  • @ejmtv3
    @ejmtv3 5 років тому

    66 years?? So precise!

  • @toddduchesne1749
    @toddduchesne1749 5 місяців тому

    "And scientists are still uncertain as to how."🤔

  • @andrewnorth170
    @andrewnorth170 3 місяці тому

    They showed the bone structure but they never mentioned it

  • @kaptenkukang
    @kaptenkukang 3 роки тому +1

    Falco titan

  • @ngjimmy338
    @ngjimmy338 29 днів тому

    Wow

  • @ngjimmy338
    @ngjimmy338 29 днів тому

    Oh

  • @mr.coffee5220
    @mr.coffee5220 4 роки тому +2

    Yes. They are Avian dinosaurs.

  • @guifdcanalli
    @guifdcanalli 5 років тому

    "Smaller the gut, smaller the snack" like during an ecologycal disaster i guess a little theropod bird will find food easier than a trex

  • @wolf3012
    @wolf3012 4 роки тому +1

    I wonder if any parrot like dinossaur could have made it to nowdays and learned to mimic human speech