Yeah. I don’t think he realised that half of the USA modern day land was Spanish, that’s not even including the tribes in the rockies or Alaska Edit: thanks for the likes lads
I agree. I see a ton of people mentioning that it would become the most powerful country, but things like the Louisana purchase probably wouldn't have been an option for Britian. Britian also had a fairly bad track record with colonies, so I doubt even the small portion of the 13 colonies would reach the power of the modern day equivalents.
@Moduile Louisiana wouldn't have been purchased, it would have just been taken, Britain was at war with napoleon and there were extremely few people there to actually guard it
@jokerface51 They would become spanish citizens as the mayas or aztecs or incas and personally I think Spain will conquer North America due to the rivalry with UK
It wasn’t about paying taxes in general. It was about paying taxes and not being represented in the government. Basically a continuation of the glorious revolution
Well those are not the only reasons we left they had a anarchy government and still do to this day but back then it was bad and they treated us poorly and not and now we got to vote on people we think should “rule us” and we get to make chooses unlike we did when we were still apart of Great Britain exe and that taxed us more than you would think and we had “no voice” -🇺🇸
@@real_logangifty07leave he didn't know even till I was like 12 i thought 18 th century= 1800 to 1900 something like tht now I am 18 and I am perfectly knowledgeable
If the US remained a British colony there'd be no Civil War because Britain abolished slavery for good in 1834. In 1807 Britain abolished importation of slaves from Africa, but the institution remained in force in the Caribbean.
In the American colonies during the time the British invoked the tea tax, many colonists switched to coffee instead of tea as a way to boycott. After awhile, it was seen as “patriotic” to drink coffee instead. It stuck and that is the reason Americans today drink coffee in the morning and not tea. If you go to England, they still drink tea in the morning.
@@johnjesus02 Bro, read what I’m saying. Tea is more known to be a drink of England. Americans are known to drink Coffee. There is a stigma there, and it stems from the American colonists during the tea tax. I never at one point said “The British don’t drink coffee.” Or that “coffee isn’t a popular drink in England.” Reading is one thing, to comprehend is another.
@@moviesandmusic66That’s Just Not true the Percentage in the Uk is 20% lower than USA, Also Britain Minimum wage is much higher than USAs, Americans rely on Tips, Go to pretty much any restaurant in USA and the Server will ask or expect a Tip, never happens in the uk, also In the USA Taxes are included in supermarkets, Not a thing in the UK.
Really you love to be a slave an American live a better life than that of British freedom is everything we are Americans dont insult the freedom fighters.
@@mostlyshorts7462 I doubt it, I think our military strength is largely a natural result of the ability to have a superpower status that our geography and resources gives us.
@@mostlyshorts7462If the US never gained its independence and didn’t encourage decolonisation (meaning the British empire would still be around and include the USA) the state would be the worlds largest hyper power with the economies of all nations involved and literally dominate the world, how would it have a weaker military? It would have all countries militaries combined.
It’s safer to drive on the left because the majority of the population will be right handed and therefore have their stronger hand on the steering wheel. Also, cricket and football are already more popular than US sports and you would probably still play American sports since baseball was invented in the UK and American football is just an offshoot of rugby. And ur trying to tell me that American food is better than British food?
@@zygbeee8563 Yeah honestly I wonder will the British will start a war with Mexico to get the west territory. Because they already seems had more than enough resources to me and colony too. Texas oil and California ports and naval base would be useful but with they go to war for it like the USA in our timeline.
The biggest difference would be that the us would be smaller, the Uk didn’t want to expend to the west. The Native Americans would have more land and would still be Abel to hunt.
@@JamesDelanoMcCarthysecondaccstill weaker than the US. And it’s even been noted that they aren’t gonna invest heavily in their navy cus they will simply rely on the US…. Which is kinda pathetic
They had enough colonies and it hasnt really helped them also US economy wouldnt be as strong if they were a colony and british soldiers would have one colony more to secure so in the end they would have less soldiers for europe
@@vergil3102 still would’ve won due to the anti-nazi revolts across Europe, not to mention the eastern front resulting in a disaster for the Germans. The Germans would have collapsed sooner or later.
Depends how they maintained the colony. if France didn't help the colonists in the war of independence, then the French royalty would have survived and 0 chance Germany would exist as a unified nation, with continued French diplomacy and meddling… It only happened due to France's weak state in the 19th century, following Napoleons catastrophic decisions. The French royalty, would have more time to adapt probably to LaFayette's vision of a parliamentary democracy like that of Britain, before he changed his mind after the war of independence.
Correction; all these were invented by British descents and other European who emigrated to usa to start a new life because Europe was busy fighting wars and causing distress in their own population. Regardless of America became a colony or not all these inventions would still had happened because all those inventors were Europeans . When the name America you proudly speak is European and is based amerigo Vespucci who was a big merchant in Italy who set on voyage on behalf of Italian empire in 1497 and 1503 during Portuguese expeditions. So keep your mouth shut Europe is the reason for all the inventions for past 400 years and we are thankful to them not to America who is its a product of Europe.
If the colonists did not get independence "exactly" when they did, the industrial revolution determined that there was 0 chance they would get it for another 200 years at least. I love how everyone commenting and constructing these videos doesn't see the most obvious determining factor.Britain's Industrial Revolution kicked off in the early 1800's and they had steam powered gunboats, within decades of war of independence. at that time in history, they were the most superior military force, in human history, including the US right now, who, as we see is struggling against Russia.They were literally fighting against sailing boats, with single shot rifles and look out easily only 2 steam powered gunboats defeated China so quickly. *Add to this the fact that other nations industrialise. Decades later in this timeline, ONLY because British, engineers, entrepreneurs and industrialists gave consultations freely for cash in London, which would not have happened due to" national security", if the US was still a colony and especially if they lost the war of independence, having risen up
The American revolution was in the late 1700’s start in 1775 and ended in 1783 with the battle of Saratoga being a major Turing point and Yorktown being the last major battle while Lexington was the first
Imagine the US under British rule for the past two hundred years. No guns for a start, that would mean tens of thousands of lives saved. An American NHS (like Canada), giving healthcare to millions more people, raising life expectancy across the country. No racial segregation a far less violent and divided society, an unarmed police force. A fairer more balanced education system across the whole country. A parliamentary government that better represents the population (you don’t need to be a millionaire to become President), football, cricket and rugby would be their main sports, with their population they would definitely have won the World Cup more than once.
We're not divided. We're united. Especially against undeserving foreigners thinking they have an opinion. Also. Let's ignore Amazon, American pop culture like NSYNC and Marvel, basically nothing that exists today would exist if we weren't independent. Nah. I'd rather be in this reality. Our problems don't concern you btw. Stay away.
Fun fact the reason they were taxed is because the British spent a lot of money to protect them so they didn’t want to pay what they owed to the British
Im Britain has the largest empire and was the strongest country on earth not 100 years ago. All empire's fall, and all Great counties loose eventually.. we had a good run, I'm happy..
It would depend entirely on how Britain dealt with the rise of Germany. It was the mismanagement of the whole rise to World War I and then World War II, which made independence movements globally inevitable, because those in those countries were unified as groups into resentment against being in such mortal danger, which they weren't so much as a Dominion, without war. Had the French monarchy adapted like the Brits monarchy was to do and had Napoleon not come to power, There would undoubtedly be no modern unified German state, Make up but just a collection of different states, which would have resulted in no 1st and Second World War. A stronger military successful France, would never allow Germany to unify because the German people were more numerous and the landmass had better natural resources, so it would be seen as a threat, which in the end it was, but France in the 19th-century was too weak after Napoleon, to prevent it through diplomacy and intimidation, like it had before Effectively, the colonists in North America preindependence In majority were quite happy under British rule(Which Wasn't very autocratic) and it was touch and go whether the American War of independence would have even happened, even when it did. Sufficient resentment had to be exacerbated and galvanised over many decades, even during the rural independents, as even during a high proportion of people were against the idea and could have been placated had certain unfortunate events happened in sequence, when they did not
Bro really doesn’t know how centuries work. The first century started in the year 0, which means all centuries are one century behind what you’d expect. 100-199 is the second century, 1700-1799 is the 18th century, etc.
The point barely mentioned of the British Empire being solo against Russia et al is significant. The US and the UK have been able to tag team in international affairs since roughly WWI. (Maybe as gar back as the Spanish-American war in 1898.) This combination has been a significant force for freedom for the rest of the world.
nitpick: the brits only had land up to the mississippi, hawaii would be independent, alaska would go to russia, and the west would go to mexico except texas which was a struggling republic
The UK which is basically the dad of the US has grown very old and tired and regressed so much that they mostly depend on there son to defend them since there barley even relevant anymore (I'm also British hello my American brothers and sisters)
The USSR couldn't have ever "won". By the 80s they had given their people so many freedoms that they were barely even communist anymore and they couldn't really prevent the end of the communist regime. If they hadn't ever given their people more freedom then there would've been massive revolts and they would've either dissolved sooner or had to kill so much of the population to retain order that they would've been weakened immensely. The only way you could ever make an alternate timeline where they "won" is by still having it and the eastern bloc still exist into the new millennium but even then that wouldn't be much of a win because the west would've been much richer and more powerful than them.
If America would’ve be United British States of America that I wouldn’t be no longer a American I’ll be British nationalists speaking English if America lost the American revolution
America wouldn't have their own separate identity possibly. America would've been extended uk basically, maybe Canada would be as well. So , UK would become a superpower again.
Biggest regression of any nation in the 20th-century, but they are still relevant, which cannot be said for Rome, ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, et cetera *But people have a short-term memory… Germany and Japan by now going through the same regression that the Brits did in the mid-20th century after they were the industrial and innovation powerhouse, of the world from the mid-1700's to 1900 and then over regulated industry to consolidate gains amongst the wealthy, who had developed and got control of that innovation, in turn preventing your ideas coming through.The hungrier unregulated Germany and Japan superseded Britain's industry and superior position in most industries. At that time, and now they have overregulated and have regressed in the 21st-century versus China, South Korea and Indonesia and are going through the same self evaluation.The Brits ended up having Thatcher let go of their industry, and develop a much more service-based economy, which was savage decision as she could have supplemented several industries, just like Germany has done to keep its car industry in Germany at the expense of the taxpayer *Japan and Germany. Decisions to over regulate starting to hurt them badly now in the 21st-century, As their low birth rates and lack of international sales are leading to major deindustrialisation, which could have been avoided by developing a more mixed economy and letting some industry go… They literally don't have the young people in the future to consume the products they produce to update their infrastructure, continue their standard of living and also to manpower their heavy industrial labour-intensive base
I doubt USA would be has big has it is now if it was a colony of the British empire, it would’ve probably not expanded further than Florida or straight up remain has a small line on the east coast of modern day USA
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well. Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today. Why do you think the British empire of all things would’ve been less expansionist against its enemies than the USA?
@@maxdavis7722 nah bro. The napoleónic wars didn’t have Spain for the most part and Britain fought more France than Spain did has the incompetent current ruler of Spain allowed occupation by France without resistance. I know history and I can assure you Spanish viceroyalties such has new spain (Cuba Hispaniola Florida Luisiana British Columbia once etc) had a very competent army because instead of killing natives or exploiting slaves they treated them well to the point Spanish army in the americas was a thousand times stronger than European Spanish army and British army in general. Britain also had to divide its navy due to different territories and due to the strategic positions of Florida and Luisiana Spain would’ve ended up taking US. Primarily because of ground numbers and ground unit quality in general. There’s also geography which Spain has in favor and also revolution. Florida is infamous for being the refuge for British black slaves that were treated in sub human conditions. These slaves travelled to Spanish Florida to become free or at least be treated has a human. Due to the amount of slaves in British mid North America it would’ve fallen quickly. In fact, Spain was one of the major reasons of why napoleonic France collapsed, at words of napoleon itself. Also, many if not all British officials said themselves any attempts to take Spanish viceroyalties would be unsuccessful probably due to Spanish power and size. The Russians didn’t advance more Into america because of fear of the Spanish which controlled south Alaska and British Columbia. Spain also controlled the Caribbean despite superiority of ships by the British empire. Most naval invasions were humilliating and unsuccessful for British like Cartagena de indias where 30k men got killed by 3k men and 247 ships got sank by 27 ships (numbers were around there.) British empire was not centered on taking Luisiana it was centered on helping Spain take over France has that would end a major enemy both had. What you said is absolutely wrong, and senseless. The only reason of why america gained independence was because of Spanish support.
@@mr.battledroid2195 Spain played a big part as Frances main ally. Also why are you pretending the Spanish empire could fight off the brits in the napoleonic wars? The Spanish empire crumbled during the napoleonic wars, it was not strong. Honestly you overestimate spains empire a lot here. You are forgetting in this scenario britain has both the USA and Canada in North America and will have quickly conquered louisiana. Spanish North America was unlikely to be able to properly fight off Britain, USA and Canada when only a couple decades later mexico would fail to fight off the USA alone.
@@maxdavis7722 spain was a main ally that supported France not with resources not troops, while UK was loosing troops Spain was just supporting France which was kicking UK’s ass. That was until napoleon invaded Spain and with help of the UK Spain kicked out the French from the peninsula. It was a very devastating war for the French. Meanwhile Spain was fighting on Europe American Spain viceroyalties barely sent any troops has they already knew Spain would end up winning. Due to this they were well protected and had massive forts on American coasts and frontiers such has Florida which was full of forts and cannons. Let’s not talk about Cuba and colombia. The number of troops by Spain is clearly bigger in the americas because unlike Britain they didn’t apply biological war on natives or enslave them. Natives were for the most part very loyal and due to this and the lack of a caste system there was many patriotic natives and mestizos and criollos which would fight for the Spanish crown. If what you’re saying is right what makes you think Britain would’ve not sent it’s “overpowering navy” to some Caribbean island or Florida to invade it? Because they had a mayor enemy. And the possession of Canada is worthless has most of Canada wasn’t controlled and was untouched. Only the south and certain parts of the north were controlled so it had a very fairly low population
The U.S. was already a different place by 1776, according to Franklin. Different values, culture, expectations, etc. It needed to be a separate nation.
If British would have simply agreed & allied with Germans, British empire would still be intact. British and Germans alliance will be invincible. Even US would also won’t stand a chance against them
Like with Canada, England would have granted the US its independence either before or after WWI. Either way what you would have is the USA in the original Willy Wonka movie. As for the US spanning coast to coast.. It might not, then again both the US and Canada would be one large country.
They would be separated. Also, WWI won't probably happened since the US independence was so important, we cannot know. But yeah maybe Colonies would he Dominions.
@@RiTzEr7 oh shit, yeah this comment is two months old I forgot what this video was even about fully, overall, the tax still isn’t that different. it is a little bit more in the Uk though, but still cheaper than paying for insurance
Well, actually the U.S would have its own economy. Look at Canada. We became a pseudo-independent nation, with completely independent government institutions in the late 19th century. The same thing would likely happen to the U.S. In fact the U.S and Canada would’ve probably merged during confederation and become one super-state sized Dominion. It’s economy would likely supersede that of Britain’s eventually. America wouldn’t be some half developed, extremely impoverished state like India or Africa after decolonization, but it would just be big Canada.
there would be no atom bombs on japan no napalm in vitenam and no drohnes on civilians in the eeastern countrys , becouse uk people actually are friendly
More likely that the world wars would not have happened, or over very quickly because America would have aided Britain immediately. Plus, Britain would have been too strong for any enemies. 👍🇬🇧🇺🇸
Uk people are friendly: colonizes 25% of the globe. Rapes the living hell out of India, steals it's resources, massacres it's people, puts down rebellions, killed natives of Australia, Canada and USA for settlers, stole new Zealand native land, imported African slaves, colonized big parts of Africa and massacred many, sykes picot agreement, Balfour declaration, ask anyone colonized by the Brits how great it was
@@orsino6829we fought all the way through both wars and our economy was not good we were using old uniforms and still was destroying the germans wen they had Lmgs assault rifles and sub machine guns nd we we’re using bolt action rifles and some old LMGs lol and we had better fighter planes wen we started bringing out hurricanes and spitfires
Instead of having issues of Gun Law, The Americas will be having a Knife Law! Imagine if every citizens of the USA has the rights to own knives of every calssifications and varieties for their 9wn security and safety...
@@RandomMackem0069 schools won’t even have attacks like the colossal scale it’s seen in the US now. The only thing shocking about school shootings is that yanks are still surprised they are being shot up 🤦🏽♂️🤣🤣
you do realise about 10x more people die from gun related injuries in the us per 100k people than die from knife related injuries in the uk per 100k people? knife crime would be much lower than current gun crime in this scenario.
If you read the treaty of Paris it technically still is. The king agreed to hold his buisness here by way of being a holy Roman elector. Then they both agreed to pay the same people some money for war debt. Early USA history had to deal with the UK medaling in their government
Yea......cause the same country who never had a world war and gave millions to Europe when interesting times happened.....but ur right. Idm eating beans and toast
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well. Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today.
The British empire started from piracy. When Henry Morgan set out on a journey to rob Spanish gold in Nicaragua in 1663. The British were unlucky at first in terms of resources and gold.
Well technically britain wouldn't have all that land but only the original colonies, in this scenario it implies that Russia still has Alaska, wich is a huge thing to consider, and there would be a giant Mexico that would be the strongest country in North america
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well. Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today.
@@maxdavis7722 good observation, didn't think abkut that, but l don't really think in this alternative reality britain wouldn't declare war on Mexico, since the american revolution britain had a lot of business in europe and stuff so l don't think they would spend so much time and resources against mexico
@@pasbaf actually in terms of global trade the USA has always been a big trader with the UK even after not being a colony. With the increased power in North America I can see it as possible that Britain would expand there.
British North America would have included Upper and Lower Canada and probably be far richer than the USA. There would have been no second amendment, slavery would have disappeared in 1833, and responsible self-government would have occurred in the early to mid 19th century. The main tax was to finance the war of 1759, and a compromise could have been reached. Louisiana may have still been French speaking and Texas may have stayed Mexican. The arguments about the Royal Proclamation of 1763 are ludicrous; the Proclamation applied to Canada - just look where its western border lies. But for some slave owners wanting to seize lands west of the Ohio river, the 13 colonies would have enjoyed free trade with the rest of the Empire and had a lower tax burden. The colonies were already largely self-governing prior to 1776. If the 13 colonies had stayed loyal, independence would have occurred by legislation like the 1867 Act granting Canada home rule - not quite as stirring.
If the US had remained a British Colony. It basically would've ended up being extremely similar to how Canada is today. Like Canada, it would've ended up being far less populated and far less urbanised with much fewer cities.
Napoleon would invade and conquer Britain causing the monarchy to escape to the Americans where they would form the “Holy Britannian empire” and conquer the rest of the new world + Japan leaving a chess enthusiast to use the powers given to him by a pizza enthusiast to liberate nippon
Napoleon had 0 chance of successfully invading Britain. Besides, if independence didn't happen due to the Lack of French involvement, in the war, there would be No Napoleon at all, because France aristocratic hegemony would have survived and eventually they probably would have adapted to a parliamentary democracy, which Lafayette had envisioned, before American war independence adapted his thought process
@@CrimsrnI think British won't resist 1v1 solo in Napoleonic wars or it would be kind of a tie. Britain had so much difficulties with big coallitions. Also French would have Luisana
Within decades Britain alone had steam powered gunboats, due to the Industrial Revolution and all other countries remained with sailing boats for decades. If the Colonies remained British,and they fought and lost the war on independence, I doubt the Brits industrialists, Entrepreneurs and Engineers would have openly spread the ideas and skills of industrialisation, with consultations in London, as it did in our timeline, for payment. Parliament would undoubtedly have been stopped this due to national security. The other European nations would have industrialised decades later, than in our timeline and more gradually- probably into the mid-20th century
British: that's my son
Roman: you are some of my children
@@fabrizio.guidi64 yea that's right
The son that had a better life than the dad
@@terrum-c7s nigga look at everything that Britain has, and us has better
@@RiTzEr7 thank your father then if you no longer live in the huts
More appropriate title: If american revolution didn't happened
It didn't
@@iamyou8994 ???
@@iamyou8994 it did
@@iamyou8994 bro's been in a coma since 1774 💀
No, its perfectly good how he put it. If it still were a british colony. Stop cryinf over your country existing since 2.6 minutes
Hawaii:
Alaska:
Puerto Rico:
American Samoa:
Guam:
Virgin Islands:
Yes
@@alexzk0409Yes the were
alaska was colonized by russia so the US would still be there including overseas territories
Literally like 2/3 of mainland US has left the chat
Alaska would be russian as the russians already declined selling Alaska to british canada as they are rivals
Yeah. I don’t think he realised that half of the USA modern day land was Spanish, that’s not even including the tribes in the rockies or Alaska
Edit: thanks for the likes lads
I agree. I see a ton of people mentioning that it would become the most powerful country, but things like the Louisana purchase probably wouldn't have been an option for Britian. Britian also had a fairly bad track record with colonies, so I doubt even the small portion of the 13 colonies would reach the power of the modern day equivalents.
It was the 13 colonies that first United and then started taking over the entire continent minus Canada and some of Mexico of course.
I think the natives would’ve had the biggest benefit without the great expansion westward.
@Moduile Louisiana wouldn't have been purchased, it would have just been taken, Britain was at war with napoleon and there were extremely few people there to actually guard it
@jokerface51 They would become spanish citizens as the mayas or aztecs or incas and personally I think Spain will conquer North America due to the rivalry with UK
Usa in 1776: i dont want to pay taxes, there bad
Also Mordern USA: lets taxes everybody who lives here
it wasn't necessarily about taxes, it was that even though they payed taxes they had no representation in government to fit their needs
It wasn’t about paying taxes in general. It was about paying taxes and not being represented in the government. Basically a continuation of the glorious revolution
@@clint4637why would colonies be represented in parliament?
Tell me you don’t know history without saying it directly:
Well those are not the only reasons we left they had a anarchy government and still do to this day but back then it was bad and they treated us poorly and not and now we got to vote on people we think should “rule us” and we get to make chooses unlike we did when we were still apart of Great Britain exe and that taxed us more than you would think and we had “no voice” -🇺🇸
"Late 18th century"
British Empire: 👀 👁️👄👁️
18th century = 1700's
@@real_logangifty07leave he didn't know even till I was like 12 i thought 18 th century= 1800 to 1900 something like tht now I am 18 and I am perfectly knowledgeable
@@Hygenictrustbro I knew when I was 8 tfyo
@@Commentdrama ok?
If the US remained a British colony there'd be no Civil War because Britain abolished slavery for good in 1834. In 1807 Britain abolished importation of slaves from Africa, but the institution remained in force in the Caribbean.
Usa civil war was fought over states rights, including slavery, not to emancipate slaves.
@@ravarga4631 The South seceded in order to maintain the "institution."
@@ravarga4631 The state rights to do what 😂
In the American colonies during the time the British invoked the tea tax, many colonists switched to coffee instead of tea as a way to boycott. After awhile, it was seen as “patriotic” to drink coffee instead. It stuck and that is the reason Americans today drink coffee in the morning and not tea. If you go to England, they still drink tea in the morning.
We drink tea all day but coffee is definitely a morning drink here
You do realise Coffee is just as, if not more popular than tea over here, right?
And no, we mainly drink coffee in the morning. Tea is a daytime drink and a just before bed drink.
@@johnjesus02 Bro, read what I’m saying. Tea is more known to be a drink of England. Americans are known to drink Coffee. There is a stigma there, and it stems from the American colonists during the tea tax. I never at one point said “The British don’t drink coffee.” Or that “coffee isn’t a popular drink in England.” Reading is one thing, to comprehend is another.
@@GeneralGouda alright mate calm down. No need to bite my head off
Usa would've just ended up like Canada, Australia and n Zealand .
Bro tue british only asked 1% taxes from citizens, now US is asking 50%, idk the British sound better right now
now they take 45% tax in UK, while minimum wage is lower than US
@@moviesandmusic66That’s Just Not true the Percentage in the Uk is 20% lower than USA, Also Britain Minimum wage is much higher than USAs, Americans rely on Tips, Go to pretty much any restaurant in USA and the Server will ask or expect a Tip, never happens in the uk, also In the USA Taxes are included in supermarkets, Not a thing in the UK.
Really you love to be a slave an American live a better life than that of British freedom is everything we are Americans dont insult the freedom fighters.
@@moviesandmusic66That’s just factually incorrect.
@moviesandmusic66 45% 😂?? No, it's 20%
We'd have universal healthcare 😭
shitty too
And a much much weaker military, our countries by now wouldn't be ours any longer
@@mostlyshorts7462 I doubt it, I think our military strength is largely a natural result of the ability to have a superpower status that our geography and resources gives us.
@@mostlyshorts7462If the US never gained its independence and didn’t encourage decolonisation (meaning the British empire would still be around and include the USA) the state would be the worlds largest hyper power with the economies of all nations involved and literally dominate the world, how would it have a weaker military? It would have all countries militaries combined.
@@andrewwigham3026 and then the nazis happen and win
We'd play cricket and soccer, eat bad food and drive on the wrong side of the road.
You would play football and still be the fattest people on earth
It’s safer to drive on the left because the majority of the population will be right handed and therefore have their stronger hand on the steering wheel. Also, cricket and football are already more popular than US sports and you would probably still play American sports since baseball was invented in the UK and American football is just an offshoot of rugby. And ur trying to tell me that American food is better than British food?
@@JimmyJr630 Yes, it is you Brit. Go brush your teeth and drink tea
The right (left) side of the road! 😊👍🇬🇧
Takes as tragic as your hairline
Imagine British owning the whole USA
This video:
Or just a part because Louisiana, Texas and the Mexican cession will be part of his respective countries (France and Mexico)
@@josem588not for long.🥵
@@zygbeee8563 and I forgoted that Oregon will be part of Canada (former British North America)
@@josem588 in this world canada and USA could be a single country.
@@zygbeee8563 Yeah honestly I wonder will the British will start a war with Mexico to get the west territory.
Because they already seems had more than enough resources to me and colony too. Texas oil and California ports and naval base would be useful but with they go to war for it like the USA in our timeline.
The biggest difference would be that the us would be smaller, the Uk didn’t want to expend to the west.
The Native Americans would have more land and would still be Abel to hunt.
18th century: US is British colony
21st century: Britain is US colony
Not colony ... but a weak old father who lives under his rich sons sympathy
@@Karlmarx-r9dUK isn't weak UK is stronger than it's past
@@Karlmarx-r9dwell said 😂
@@Karlmarx-r9dIts the 6th largest rcpnomy and 5th strongest military.
@@JamesDelanoMcCarthysecondaccstill weaker than the US. And it’s even been noted that they aren’t gonna invest heavily in their navy cus they will simply rely on the US…. Which is kinda pathetic
WW2 would have been very different as well because Britain would have a good military to potentially defeat the nazis before France fell.
They had enough colonies and it hasnt really helped them also US economy wouldnt be as strong if they were a colony and british soldiers would have one colony more to secure so in the end they would have less soldiers for europe
@@vergil3102 still would’ve won due to the anti-nazi revolts across Europe, not to mention the eastern front resulting in a disaster for the Germans. The Germans would have collapsed sooner or later.
Depends how they maintained the colony. if France didn't help the colonists in the war of independence, then the French royalty would have survived and 0 chance Germany would exist as a unified nation, with continued French diplomacy and meddling… It only happened due to France's weak state in the 19th century, following Napoleons catastrophic decisions.
The French royalty, would have more time to adapt probably to LaFayette's vision of a parliamentary democracy like that of Britain, before he changed his mind after the war of independence.
As a Canadian I don’t pay taxes to Britain and we have an economy better than most of the world
Oh so do we. So it checks out. 😂
@@seanbrummfield448 I'm also 14 so I don't even have to pay taxes
If the US was still a British colony the world would be a much better place.
No
Uh no it wouldn’t
USA also invented a lot of things such as TV’s, Airplanes, cellphones, stuff like that that wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for America.
Correction; all these were invented by British descents and other European who emigrated to usa to start a new life because Europe was busy fighting wars and causing distress in their own population.
Regardless of America became a colony or not all these inventions would still had happened because all those inventors were Europeans .
When the name America you proudly speak is European and is based amerigo Vespucci who was a big merchant in Italy who set on voyage on behalf of Italian empire in 1497 and 1503 during Portuguese expeditions.
So keep your mouth shut Europe is the reason for all the inventions for past 400 years and we are thankful to them not to America who is its a product of Europe.
@@rickykhehra7299 fax
Then Britain is the most powerful country on Earth. The US and Canada would be united into a super colony.
Well Code Geass would've happened obviously
Great comment
Legendary Comment 😂
If the colonists did not get independence "exactly" when they did, the industrial revolution determined that there was 0 chance they would get it for another 200 years at least. I love how everyone commenting and constructing these videos doesn't see the most obvious determining factor.Britain's Industrial Revolution kicked off in the early 1800's and they had steam powered gunboats, within decades of war of independence. at that time in history, they were the most superior military force, in human history, including the US right now, who, as we see is struggling against Russia.They were literally fighting against sailing boats, with single shot rifles and look out easily only 2 steam powered gunboats defeated China so quickly.
*Add to this the fact that other nations industrialise. Decades later in this timeline, ONLY because British, engineers, entrepreneurs and industrialists gave consultations freely for cash in London, which would not have happened due to" national security", if the US was still a colony and especially if they lost the war of independence, having risen up
Worst part about this for the USA is that they get free healthcare 😭
@BatmanwillalwaysbeontopI don’t know if you mean the UK but if so it is still free I would rather pay nothing for an ambulance ride then like £5000
@Batmanwillalwaysbeontopunderstood yeah I would rather the UK one too
The American revolution was in the late 1700’s start in 1775 and ended in 1783 with the battle of Saratoga being a major Turing point and Yorktown being the last major battle while Lexington was the first
UK: I have raised you well, my son.
Meanwhile Spain....bruh we colonized most of US land.
@@ABCXYZ-vg9gh spanish and uk both were the father and mother
@@SaitoR9 UK: 13 filthy colonies in the east coast
Spain: 90% current USA
US WOULDN'T be a 4th world country like it is rn
Day 1, What if France and UK united🙏
It almost happened after WW2
And could had happened when France fell
An unstoppable force
@@loganmarriott514 imagine if France and britain had united back when napoleon was ruling,100% unrealistic but still imagine
Civil war speed run.
Imagine the US under British rule for the past two hundred years.
No guns for a start, that would mean tens of thousands of lives saved. An American NHS (like Canada), giving healthcare to millions more people, raising life expectancy across the country. No racial segregation a far less violent and divided society, an unarmed police force. A fairer more balanced education system across the whole country. A parliamentary government that better represents the population (you don’t need to be a millionaire to become President), football, cricket and rugby would be their main sports, with their population they would definitely have won the World Cup more than once.
🤡
Average Brit:
@@RiTzEr7ht wrong with britain mate
@@jakethebritishpatriot bo'oh'o'wa'er
We're not divided.
We're united. Especially against undeserving foreigners thinking they have an opinion.
Also. Let's ignore Amazon, American pop culture like NSYNC and Marvel, basically nothing that exists today would exist if we weren't independent. Nah. I'd rather be in this reality. Our problems don't concern you btw. Stay away.
Fun fact the reason they were taxed is because the British spent a lot of money to protect them so they didn’t want to pay what they owed to the British
I think it's more realistic that it would've got dominion status
Uk: let’s my son take care of his country
Basically the history between UK and USA is like when you have short parents and end up being like 6’4.
Sounds about right
No, completely oppisite, the Father is tall and the son is short. Now the father is old and the son has grown a little bit higher
Im Britain has the largest empire and was the strongest country on earth not 100 years ago. All empire's fall, and all Great counties loose eventually.. we had a good run, I'm happy..
It would depend entirely on how Britain dealt with the rise of Germany. It was the mismanagement of the whole rise to World War I and then World War II, which made independence movements globally inevitable, because those in those countries were unified as groups into resentment against being in such mortal danger, which they weren't so much as a Dominion, without war.
Had the French monarchy adapted like the Brits monarchy was to do and had Napoleon not come to power, There would undoubtedly be no modern unified German state, Make up but just a collection of different states, which would have resulted in no 1st and Second World War. A stronger military successful France, would never allow Germany to unify because the German people were more numerous and the landmass had better natural resources, so it would be seen as a threat, which in the end it was, but France in the 19th-century was too weak after Napoleon, to prevent it through diplomacy and intimidation, like it had before
Effectively, the colonists in North America preindependence In majority were quite happy under British rule(Which Wasn't very autocratic) and it was touch and go whether the American War of independence would have even happened, even when it did. Sufficient resentment had to be exacerbated and galvanised over many decades, even during the rural independents, as even during a high proportion of people were against the idea and could have been placated had certain unfortunate events happened in sequence, when they did not
Probably the good ending: no us messing up with world's geopolitics, nor its economy.
Yeah no people getting killed in vietnam, laos, millions of people would still be alive in the middle east!
@@pricemolotovcurse346 True, and no American Demoncracy in this World
No, you'd just have the Brits doing it instead 😂
Anti American clown
most importantly, no more uncle sam:C
Yeah :(
:(
thank fuck
@@Crimsrncommie
😭
“The American revolution happened in the late 18th century”
*george Washington died in 1799* 💀
18th century = 1700s
We're currently in the 21st century
1799 is literally the latest in the 18th century you can get dude
Bro really doesn’t know how centuries work.
The first century started in the year 0, which means all centuries are one century behind what you’d expect. 100-199 is the second century, 1700-1799 is the 18th century, etc.
so he barely missed the 19th century
By your logic we’re currently living at the 20th century
I’m pretty sure if this did happen u.s. wouldn’t have Alaska as it was sold to them since Britain was still a big competitor back then
The reason Russian Empire sold the Alaska us becouse they knew the British would invade it at some point. And it was very likely they would
The point barely mentioned of the British Empire being solo against Russia et al is significant. The US and the UK have been able to tag team in international affairs since roughly WWI. (Maybe as gar back as the Spanish-American war in 1898.) This combination has been a significant force for freedom for the rest of the world.
nitpick: the brits only had land up to the mississippi, hawaii would be independent, alaska would go to russia, and the west would go to mexico except texas which was a struggling republic
The UK which is basically the dad of the US has grown very old and tired and regressed so much that they mostly depend on there son to defend them since there barley even relevant anymore (I'm also British hello my American brothers and sisters)
british tax is lower than mordern us tax :i
What if USSR won the cold war?
America would be 10+ more paranoid
It couldn't, planned economies always fail.
The USSR couldn't have ever "won". By the 80s they had given their people so many freedoms that they were barely even communist anymore and they couldn't really prevent the end of the communist regime. If they hadn't ever given their people more freedom then there would've been massive revolts and they would've either dissolved sooner or had to kill so much of the population to retain order that they would've been weakened immensely. The only way you could ever make an alternate timeline where they "won" is by still having it and the eastern bloc still exist into the new millennium but even then that wouldn't be much of a win because the west would've been much richer and more powerful than them.
@@warthunder9155 obviously the US thought differently.
@@warthunder9155They don't trumpie. Not what you imagine.
Americans ancestors are british.
@@davidgarcia5593British are also likely Germans
If America would’ve be United British States of America that I wouldn’t be no longer a American I’ll be British nationalists speaking English if America lost the American revolution
America wouldn't have their own separate identity possibly. America would've been extended uk basically, maybe Canada would be as well. So , UK would become a superpower again.
But we would give u independence with less bloodshed and stuff like canada and Australia we ain’t tht evil
@@jakethebritishpatriotfirst try to take care of ur country, then talk about usa
independence is overrated.
This video:
Late 1700s US: We are free!
Late 1800s UK: Gimme that back!
Most likely US have Lord George Bush, Lord Trump and Lord Obama
The Brit’s had the biggest downfall of all time 💀
Biggest regression of any nation in the 20th-century, but they are still relevant, which cannot be said for Rome, ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, et cetera
*But people have a short-term memory… Germany and Japan by now going through the same regression that the Brits did in the mid-20th century after they were the industrial and innovation powerhouse, of the world from the mid-1700's to 1900 and then over regulated industry to consolidate gains amongst the wealthy, who had developed and got control of that innovation, in turn preventing your ideas coming through.The hungrier unregulated Germany and Japan superseded Britain's industry and superior position in most industries. At that time, and now they have overregulated and have regressed in the 21st-century versus China, South Korea and Indonesia and are going through the same self evaluation.The Brits ended up having Thatcher let go of their industry, and develop a much more service-based economy, which was savage decision as she could have supplemented several industries, just like Germany has done to keep its car industry in Germany at the expense of the taxpayer
*Japan and Germany. Decisions to over regulate starting to hurt them badly now in the 21st-century, As their low birth rates and lack of international sales are leading to major deindustrialisation, which could have been avoided by developing a more mixed economy and letting some industry go… They literally don't have the young people in the future to consume the products they produce to update their infrastructure, continue their standard of living and also to manpower their heavy industrial labour-intensive base
Biggest empire going to have the biggest downfall
I doubt USA would be has big has it is now if it was a colony of the British empire, it would’ve probably not expanded further than Florida or straight up remain has a small line on the east coast of modern day USA
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well.
Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today.
Why do you think the British empire of all things would’ve been less expansionist against its enemies than the USA?
@@maxdavis7722 nah bro. The napoleónic wars didn’t have Spain for the most part and Britain fought more France than Spain did has the incompetent current ruler of Spain allowed occupation by France without resistance. I know history and I can assure you Spanish viceroyalties such has new spain (Cuba Hispaniola Florida Luisiana British Columbia once etc) had a very competent army because instead of killing natives or exploiting slaves they treated them well to the point Spanish army in the americas was a thousand times stronger than European Spanish army and British army in general. Britain also had to divide its navy due to different territories and due to the strategic positions of Florida and Luisiana Spain would’ve ended up taking US. Primarily because of ground numbers and ground unit quality in general. There’s also geography which Spain has in favor and also revolution. Florida is infamous for being the refuge for British black slaves that were treated in sub human conditions. These slaves travelled to Spanish Florida to become free or at least be treated has a human. Due to the amount of slaves in British mid North America it would’ve fallen quickly. In fact, Spain was one of the major reasons of why napoleonic France collapsed, at words of napoleon itself. Also, many if not all British officials said themselves any attempts to take Spanish viceroyalties would be unsuccessful probably due to Spanish power and size. The Russians didn’t advance more Into america because of fear of the Spanish which controlled south Alaska and British Columbia. Spain also controlled the Caribbean despite superiority of ships by the British empire. Most naval invasions were humilliating and unsuccessful for British like Cartagena de indias where 30k men got killed by 3k men and 247 ships got sank by 27 ships (numbers were around there.) British empire was not centered on taking Luisiana it was centered on helping Spain take over France has that would end a major enemy both had. What you said is absolutely wrong, and senseless. The only reason of why america gained independence was because of Spanish support.
@@mr.battledroid2195 Spain played a big part as Frances main ally. Also why are you pretending the Spanish empire could fight off the brits in the napoleonic wars? The Spanish empire crumbled during the napoleonic wars, it was not strong.
Honestly you overestimate spains empire a lot here. You are forgetting in this scenario britain has both the USA and Canada in North America and will have quickly conquered louisiana. Spanish North America was unlikely to be able to properly fight off Britain, USA and Canada when only a couple decades later mexico would fail to fight off the USA alone.
@@maxdavis7722 spain was a main ally that supported France not with resources not troops, while UK was loosing troops Spain was just supporting France which was kicking UK’s ass. That was until napoleon invaded Spain and with help of the UK Spain kicked out the French from the peninsula. It was a very devastating war for the French. Meanwhile Spain was fighting on Europe American Spain viceroyalties barely sent any troops has they already knew Spain would end up winning. Due to this they were well protected and had massive forts on American coasts and frontiers such has Florida which was full of forts and cannons. Let’s not talk about Cuba and colombia. The number of troops by Spain is clearly bigger in the americas because unlike Britain they didn’t apply biological war on natives or enslave them. Natives were for the most part very loyal and due to this and the lack of a caste system there was many patriotic natives and mestizos and criollos which would fight for the Spanish crown. If what you’re saying is right what makes you think Britain would’ve not sent it’s “overpowering navy” to some Caribbean island or Florida to invade it? Because they had a mayor enemy. And the possession of Canada is worthless has most of Canada wasn’t controlled and was untouched. Only the south and certain parts of the north were controlled so it had a very fairly low population
@@maxdavis7722 t
But the fact is..american citizen is majority british root..original from british land
America is Britain's eldest son
not anymore
@@derrcirno9490yes still.
The U.S. was already a different place by 1776, according to Franklin. Different values, culture, expectations, etc. It needed to be a separate nation.
The question is what if they would be under the British connection (for example like Canada or Australia)
I believe we are and everything we know is a lie
If British would have simply agreed & allied with Germans, British empire would still be intact. British and Germans alliance will be invincible. Even US would also won’t stand a chance against them
Like with Canada, England would have granted the US its independence either before or after WWI. Either way what you would have is the USA in the original Willy Wonka movie.
As for the US spanning coast to coast.. It might not, then again both the US and Canada would be one large country.
They would be separated. Also, WWI won't probably happened since the US independence was so important, we cannot know. But yeah maybe Colonies would he Dominions.
Just because we got our independence don't think we won't wreck your entire country for messing with the mother country
The good ol' days
The British would have likely kept the colonies separate, for various reasons.
But hey, you would get free healthcare!XD
Yeah because of the high taxes
@@RiTzEr7 there is really not that big of a difference at all in most free health care countrys I’ll give you that a few are higher though.
@@BloodTheTea I thought we were talking about the uk and america tho?
@@RiTzEr7 oh shit, yeah this comment is two months old I forgot what this video was even about fully, overall, the tax still isn’t that different. it is a little bit more in the Uk though, but still cheaper than paying for insurance
@@BloodTheTea fair enough
Well, actually the U.S would have its own economy. Look at Canada. We became a pseudo-independent nation, with completely independent government institutions in the late 19th century. The same thing would likely happen to the U.S. In fact the U.S and Canada would’ve probably merged during confederation and become one super-state sized Dominion. It’s economy would likely supersede that of Britain’s eventually. America wouldn’t be some half developed, extremely impoverished state like India or Africa after decolonization, but it would just be big Canada.
there would be no atom bombs on japan no napalm in vitenam and no drohnes on civilians in the eeastern countrys , becouse uk people actually are friendly
More likely that the world wars would not have happened, or over very quickly because America would have aided Britain immediately. Plus, Britain would have been too strong for any enemies. 👍🇬🇧🇺🇸
@Orsino
What a stupid comment lmfao the UK and USSR were already defeating Germany before the USA even joined the war.
Uk people are friendly: colonizes 25% of the globe. Rapes the living hell out of India, steals it's resources, massacres it's people, puts down rebellions, killed natives of Australia, Canada and USA for settlers, stole new Zealand native land, imported African slaves, colonized big parts of Africa and massacred many, sykes picot agreement, Balfour declaration, ask anyone colonized by the Brits how great it was
@@orsino6829we fought all the way through both wars and our economy was not good we were using old uniforms and still was destroying the germans wen they had Lmgs assault rifles and sub machine guns nd we we’re using bolt action rifles and some old LMGs lol and we had better fighter planes wen we started bringing out hurricanes and spitfires
British empire is still alive it has just changed its headquarters from london to Washington
Instead of having issues of Gun Law, The Americas will be having a Knife Law! Imagine if every citizens of the USA has the rights to own knives of every calssifications and varieties for their 9wn security and safety...
Schools would be getting knifed up
@@RandomMackem0069 schools won’t even have attacks like the colossal scale it’s seen in the US now. The only thing shocking about school shootings is that yanks are still surprised they are being shot up 🤦🏽♂️🤣🤣
you do realise about 10x more people die from gun related injuries in the us per 100k people than die from knife related injuries in the uk per 100k people? knife crime would be much lower than current gun crime in this scenario.
@@CrimsrnYou forgot to mention the population ratio
If you read the treaty of Paris it technically still is. The king agreed to hold his buisness here by way of being a holy Roman elector. Then they both agreed to pay the same people some money for war debt. Early USA history had to deal with the UK medaling in their government
if the us was still a colony, then we wouldn't have had the hamilton musical
Would have been soooo much better if America was still British.
Better yet, we didn't take it from the natives.
USA would have universal healthcare
And no mass shooting of innocent children every other day
Nononono
Old Germany: coughs
What?
How did you manage to say so little in so many words?
If only American never got their independent. England would be unstoppable
It would have been a better world.
Yea......cause the same country who never had a world war and gave millions to Europe when interesting times happened.....but ur right. Idm eating beans and toast
We wouldn’t be taxed. It’s why we became independent and the UK only needed it because they were in a costly war protecting then
It was a 1% tax on tea, but people in america used it as an excuse to manipulate the masses to revolt
the US would not go over the Mississippi River and the Appalachian mountains, since those were the borders between British and the Natives
*British and French and Spanish
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well.
Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today.
@@chillmemes5865 the french lost all american territories in 1763 so by the time of the revolution they were not bordering.
Fun fact: the Us gained all its main land (the big part) in the late 1800s. But it gained independence in the late 17s.
They’d know geography.
Very funny... but stupid people are everywhere.
they do know geography
And lose the title of the sole super power of the world 😞
The British empire started from piracy. When Henry Morgan set out on a journey to rob Spanish gold in Nicaragua in 1663. The British were unlucky at first in terms of resources and gold.
What if Czech Empire existed?
Another thing is that Germany in ww1 and ww2 would win
It would be the saddest day of my life.
Everyday would be the saddest day of our lives under british rule.
Sorry ;-;
@@bealightinthedarkness9986 yeah I’m sure American mass shootings wouldn’t of been their under British rule
Yet your lives would be vastly improved under English rule
then you'd realise you no longer live under the worst nation on earth and you'd be happy
@@YorkshireMemeshonestly bloody Americans think there the best
Americans will call football and not soccer, will be playing cricket and not baseball, they be playing rugby instead of American football.
It would be much better then we only have to hate one of them
Be nice.
The Brits are not hated like the US all over the world - facts.
@@onenation8707 their empire was
@@onenation8707 i doubt that one
@@hiplsnols4394 Every country has a past. I live in the present
Firstly slavery would have been abolished a lot earlier and there wouldn't have been any Jim crow crap
Well technically britain wouldn't have all that land but only the original colonies, in this scenario it implies that Russia still has Alaska, wich is a huge thing to consider, and there would be a giant Mexico that would be the strongest country in North america
Not really, it’s likely that britain would’ve taken Louisiana in the napoleonic wars and might’ve attacked mexico too as both Spain and France were at war with Britain. Neither Spain or France could properly defend its colonies against the Royal Navy and British North America as well.
Also Alaska probably would’ve been taken in the Crimean war, it’s likely that the USA would’ve been a similar size under the British empire as it is today.
@@maxdavis7722 good observation, didn't think abkut that, but l don't really think in this alternative reality britain wouldn't declare war on Mexico, since the american revolution britain had a lot of business in europe and stuff so l don't think they would spend so much time and resources against mexico
@@pasbaf actually in terms of global trade the USA has always been a big trader with the UK even after not being a colony. With the increased power in North America I can see it as possible that Britain would expand there.
@@pasbaf They would’ve taken much of North America before the napoleonic wars
@@maxdavis7722 I think the UK would let Mexico keep their land so the border would go from Oregon to Texas
ARE YOU TELLING ME THEY WOULD TAX OUR TEA!!??!?!?!?
That's true but pineapple belongs on pizza
I will send you to Jesus
I will send you to Jesus
@@bealightinthedarkness9986 daddy
@@mrsillytacos daddy
Enjoy your time with the devil
I love our dad. United Kingdom is a good dad. Love you dad.
NewYork Stabbing cases would increase.
The US has a higher stabbing rate per capita than the UK
But there would be less school shooters
And u would have free healthcare and not have to pay ab 7million to be in the back of an ambulance
@@ptasznik5973 You're a hypocrite.
There's more knife crime in America 💀💀💀🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
British North America would have included Upper and Lower Canada and probably be far richer than the USA. There would have been no second amendment, slavery would have disappeared in 1833, and responsible self-government would have occurred in the early to mid 19th century. The main tax was to finance the war of 1759, and a compromise could have been reached. Louisiana may have still been French speaking and Texas may have stayed Mexican. The arguments about the Royal Proclamation of 1763 are ludicrous; the Proclamation applied to Canada - just look where its western border lies. But for some slave owners wanting to seize lands west of the Ohio river, the 13 colonies would have enjoyed free trade with the rest of the Empire and had a lower tax burden. The colonies were already largely self-governing prior to 1776.
If the 13 colonies had stayed loyal, independence would have occurred by legislation like the 1867 Act granting Canada home rule - not quite as stirring.
Kinda wish the world was still all British
Me a british person: laughes maniacally
British demise
Me:oh
Never let them know your next move : yes im no gay
What
Can you explain your comment please?
Wrong video pal 😂
This video: am I a joke to you?
Wtf?
If the US had remained a British Colony. It basically would've ended up being extremely similar to how Canada is today. Like Canada, it would've ended up being far less populated and far less urbanised with much fewer cities.
The US would literally just be Canada. End of video
Napoleon would invade and conquer Britain causing the monarchy to escape to the Americans where they would form the “Holy Britannian empire” and conquer the rest of the new world + Japan leaving a chess enthusiast to use the powers given to him by a pizza enthusiast to liberate nippon
Napoleon had 0 chance of successfully invading Britain. Besides, if independence didn't happen due to the Lack of French involvement, in the war, there would be No Napoleon at all, because France aristocratic hegemony would have survived and eventually they probably would have adapted to a parliamentary democracy, which Lafayette had envisioned, before American war independence adapted his thought process
@@Rowlph8888 It’s a reference to Code Geass my guy
I miss my countries greatness 🇬🇧😭
top 10 nerfed countries
same
Mexico would probably still have its northern half, although i could see the british taking Louisiana during the Nepoleonic wars
Napoleon wants to know your location 😂😂😂
🇬🇧Vs🇨🇵
considering britain won without the american colonies, if you include the american colonies then napoleon loses even harder.
@@Crimsrn Vise versa with Frace too
@@CrimsrnI think British won't resist 1v1 solo in Napoleonic wars or it would be kind of a tie. Britain had so much difficulties with big coallitions. Also French would have Luisana
A british colony wouldnt have such a strong economy with other words no land lease for soviets and west allies
PRINCE HARRY IN LOS ANGELES USA MONITORING D SITUATION 😂
Spain, Russia, France, Dutch left the chat
Within decades Britain alone had steam powered gunboats, due to the Industrial Revolution and all other countries remained with sailing boats for decades.
If the Colonies remained British,and they fought and lost the war on independence, I doubt the Brits industrialists, Entrepreneurs and Engineers would have openly spread the ideas and skills of industrialisation, with consultations in London, as it did in our timeline, for payment. Parliament would undoubtedly have been stopped this due to national security. The other European nations would have industrialised decades later, than in our timeline and more gradually- probably into the mid-20th century
Rule Britannia! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 👑 😎
U frogot 1 thing no guns
And no police brutality killing of innocent people. No death penalty and no systematic racism
@@onenation8707 the only thing u got right is the system bit there is still the rest
We arn't the only country with guns and racism!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@onenation8707 you think there wouldn’t be systematic racism?
*Knifes joined the chat*