'Had enough! Ben Leo RAGES at Thames Water for amount of sewage pumped into water

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • ‘I swim with my children in the sea…I’ve had enough of the lot!’
    GB News’ Ben Leo fumes at Thames Water following the revelation that The number of raw sewage spills into rivers by the company more than doubled last year.
    #thameswater #waterways #sewage
    Keep up to date with the latest news at www.gbnews.com
    Don’t let them silence us - support GB News here: gbnews.com/sup...
    Twitter: / gbnews
    Facebook: / gbnewsonline
    Download the GB News app! You can watch GB News on all of your favourite devices and keep up to date with the latest news, analysis, opinion and more.
    www.gbnews.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 96

  • @markscript5746
    @markscript5746 5 місяців тому +26

    A basic right, water is being run for profit

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому

      But socialism would be bad lol

    • @dirtycitydisco
      @dirtycitydisco 5 місяців тому +1

      "A basic right, water is being run for profit" - This is capitalism. And sometimes, in capitalism, businesses fail; which is what should happen to Thames Water. Only then, do the government takeover.

  • @peterdowdall8972
    @peterdowdall8972 5 місяців тому +22

    We can moan as much as we want high water bills electricity and gas bills council tax bills we are like prostitutes been screwed 24 /7

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому +2

      Brexit is going well

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому

      @@dogbreaththe3rd851 explain?

    • @wallacewhybrow2705
      @wallacewhybrow2705 5 місяців тому +2

      @run2cat4run Change the record. There is something very disturbing about your apparent fixation with Brexit. Apart from that, you are extremely boring.

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому +1

      @@wallacewhybrow2705 and you are avoiding my questions

  • @hunsey
    @hunsey 5 місяців тому +10

    When Thatcher championed the privatization of our Water in 1989 has the best deal for the UK people, for bills and service, they started with a clean slate, and no debts. In 2024 they had collection of debts of £ 60 billion during the same time shareholder dividends payout has been £72 billion. So despite OfWAT confirming the taxpayer has been providing "All" of the funding to the water companies for 33 years, we are being told the shareholders are refusing to pay for works needed and want bills raised by 40 % to pay for it.

  • @richardjames5147
    @richardjames5147 5 місяців тому +9

    'Its not a failure of privatisation, the gov have failed to compell the compamies to invest, the regulators have dropped the ball'
    So privatisation is no good without government intervention and regulatory involvement?

    • @richardjames5147
      @richardjames5147 5 місяців тому +1

      @@johnkitching2248 they are all a shower, left to right, top to bottom. Useless, corrupt and full of ideological garbage.

  • @songscoops4205
    @songscoops4205 5 місяців тому +15

    Money money money the water tastes funny in a rich man's world 😅

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому

      That’s capitalism for ya

    • @songscoops4205
      @songscoops4205 5 місяців тому

      @run2cat4run The NHS is the role model of Capitalism...

    • @run2cat4run
      @run2cat4run 5 місяців тому

      @@dogbreaththe3rd851 look at UK with pro capitalist Tories and tell me thing’s are ok?

  • @roymartin8546
    @roymartin8546 5 місяців тому +6

    When they sold off UK utilities they sold off thousands of acres of land and buildings
    They were all under valued

    • @highlandgnome
      @highlandgnome 5 місяців тому +1

      Aye, and I'm sure the taxpayer will be charged over the odds to buy them back, like all the public building that have been sold off. Police Stations, Post Offices, Libraries, Public Parks etc. What time does the revolution start?

  • @mm3nrx
    @mm3nrx 5 місяців тому +9

    it will be cheaper to buy water from the supermarket if they do this

    • @FDCAFOK
      @FDCAFOK 5 місяців тому +2

      Cheaper to just not pay.

  • @stephenbull8962
    @stephenbull8962 5 місяців тому +5

    Since it and other water suppliers were privatised the share holders have drawn their profits directly without putting anything towards the infrastructure.

  • @chipocasa5757
    @chipocasa5757 5 місяців тому +8

    That Man on the right saying its all to do with OFWAT not having the powers . lol OFWAT has ordered them to do 1000s off things but get ignored as the fines are built into there yearly budget .. Its gotta be brought back into UK hands . Its the only way we can do whats needed .

  • @REX4340
    @REX4340 5 місяців тому +5

    Utilities should be non profit.

  • @derekwhite2929
    @derekwhite2929 5 місяців тому +7

    What's this guy on about "the water which they produce" they're in the water management business they don't 'produce' water!

  • @ancietman
    @ancietman 5 місяців тому +3

    Thames water shareholders pocketing all the money rather than keeping the water infrastructure in good nick. Now I expect it will be down to the tax payer to bail them out.

  • @DW-dd4iw
    @DW-dd4iw 5 місяців тому +7

    The water companies and OFWAT are too closely linked. Former OFWAT executives become directors of water companies and vice versa.

  • @petersmith2522
    @petersmith2522 5 місяців тому +5

    I cant understand how nationalised cant work the profits would still be there but from the profits you pay to run the companies

  • @TheRahsoft
    @TheRahsoft 5 місяців тому +3

    so.. the australian bank who put thames onto this path of huge debt in order to feed their own shareholders gets away with their behaviour !!
    and their reward? to be alllowed to go after southern water..
    that bank and their directors should have been banned for life.
    and ofwat should have been fired for being asleep on the job when this started years ago..
    its time for public monopoly utilities to be nationalised( without compensation as they have made plenty of moeny already) and only run privately under licence..

  • @stephenbull8962
    @stephenbull8962 5 місяців тому +4

    Who got the back handlers when it was privatised?

  • @FDCAFOK
    @FDCAFOK 5 місяців тому +7

    I haven't paid for water in 10yrs.

    • @petersmith2522
      @petersmith2522 5 місяців тому +1

      Are they taking legal action i only got slightly behind with payments and they got a solicitor involved and put my bill back to what id paid off so since ive just ignored them not paid any

    • @FDCAFOK
      @FDCAFOK 5 місяців тому

      @@petersmith2522 No. They just sold it off to a debt agency, and their letters went into the bin. Not a lot they can do unless you make contact.

    • @FDCAFOK
      @FDCAFOK 5 місяців тому +3

      @Henry-Ludlow Not sure, it just comes out of my tap.

  • @alanskyrme9048
    @alanskyrme9048 5 місяців тому +2

    We also remember the Thames being cleaned up and fish returning to swim in cleaner waters

  • @pemj7360
    @pemj7360 5 місяців тому +3

    Stop paying the water bill simple when they realise they losing money then they might sorry themselves out . Personally I'd let them go bust . I don't care about the shareholders losing money. Stop the backhanders to environment agency and ofwot and letting them turn blind eye.

  • @Afterthoughtbtw
    @Afterthoughtbtw 5 місяців тому +1

    Remember folks, when privatisation fails, it's not a problem with privatisation. But when national control of services fails, it's because government can't be trusted to run these things.
    Also, privatisation of monopolies is a good thing, despite the fundamental conceit of capitalism being that competition improves services and monopolies - by definition - have no competition.

  • @ivortoad
    @ivortoad 5 місяців тому +2

    They should be beholden to all the water users before investors.

  • @bushman143
    @bushman143 5 місяців тому +3

    Privatisation of water companies prioritises profits for the companies and dividends for the shareholders, not the quality of service. They will spend less money on improving water quality to increase profit leading to a poorer quality of water, especially with no competition. The railways and utilities were not as bad in the 80’s and in some cases the gov reduced their service to push for privatisation.

  • @S-North
    @S-North 5 місяців тому +12

    Imagine what an influx of 1.2 million people 'a year' does to infrastructure, including our sewage infrastructure.

    • @dirtycitydisco
      @dirtycitydisco 5 місяців тому +1

      I really don't think you can turn Thames Water's ineffectiveness to run a business into a rant on immigration.

    • @hughzapretti-boyden9187
      @hughzapretti-boyden9187 5 місяців тому +3

      Imagine an influx of tory gangsters selling off our nation's assets for last 14yrs!😂

    • @S-North
      @S-North 5 місяців тому

      @@hughzapretti-boyden9187 Indeed, now couple that with an influx of 1.2 million people a year.

    • @highlandgnome
      @highlandgnome 5 місяців тому +3

      Imagine if £72 billion hadn't been syphoned off instead of reinvestment in infrastructure.

    • @S-North
      @S-North 5 місяців тому

      @@highlandgnome Yep, now imagine that 72 billion could be used for, without the burden of mass 3rd world immigration!

  • @TheLeroy79
    @TheLeroy79 5 місяців тому +1

    Stop Privatization 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

  • @deanrockett3110
    @deanrockett3110 5 місяців тому +3

    Who's funding the regulator follow the money

  • @Paul-qs3nu
    @Paul-qs3nu 5 місяців тому +3

    It's seams to me if l read this right is another Philip Green situation were someone ,in his case or some company takes dividends , or assets our of a company then attempts to sell it on loaded with debt.
    Millions were taken out of Thames water, then it was sold on , now they are 500 million in debt, their should not only nationalion but a public inquiry and the company and those responsible hit with the full force of the law

  • @robertanthonynolan9697
    @robertanthonynolan9697 5 місяців тому +1

    the accountabilty when nationalised is in the hands of the gov and if they fail to run the industry properly we get the chance to sack them by voting them out

  • @jamieanderson-slight6259
    @jamieanderson-slight6259 5 місяців тому +1

    It's cheaper for them to pay the fines .Not interested in fixing or improving the system. I actually heard a senior employee of one of the water companies say this.

  • @user-jx3ms6pd9m
    @user-jx3ms6pd9m 5 місяців тому

    Amys braindead ad usual. Thames should go into administration and offwat abolished. Disgusting governance.

  • @pholdway5801
    @pholdway5801 5 місяців тому

    shareholders should not be profiting if there is no operational profit to share. Have a 10 year no payout holiday and let the company get off it's knees

  • @haruhisuzumiya6650
    @haruhisuzumiya6650 4 місяці тому

    It's a problem of privatization
    Offwat is captured by Thames water

  • @GoogleAccount-so4ge
    @GoogleAccount-so4ge 5 місяців тому +2

    but they have a right flag 😂😂😂

  • @brett76544
    @brett76544 4 місяці тому

    I wonder, what if the private companies notified the municipalities that it would no longer accept stormwater into the sewer system and require a plan from them within 60to 180 days for installing a septate stormwater system. Why, well it is happening here in the US.

  • @michellebennettsnow5228
    @michellebennettsnow5228 5 місяців тому

    Well is has not worked in the Private Sector, in fact financially its worse, its time the plug wax pulled, this is a private company, dictated by shareholders and regulated by ofwat, why should any government tell them how to run their business, or even oversee it, it is in private foreign hands. If the government are required to oversee these utility companies then re nationalise them.

  • @hughzapretti-boyden9187
    @hughzapretti-boyden9187 5 місяців тому +2

    You all voted the tory gangsters in!😂

  • @Stevgar2
    @Stevgar2 5 місяців тому

    @GBNews if you think that's bad just checkout what the city of Montreal does over here in Canada twice a year 😂

  • @Jordan1000
    @Jordan1000 5 місяців тому +1

    Ben is so fit ❤

    • @7RHA
      @7RHA 5 місяців тому

      Well if he's looking in, you just might get a chance,

    • @suzy7726
      @suzy7726 5 місяців тому +2

      Patrick's better looking 😊

    • @Jordan1000
      @Jordan1000 5 місяців тому +1

      @@suzy7726 he is!

  • @nicolass7102
    @nicolass7102 5 місяців тому +2

    Uk after brexit is a mess

    • @T5Zplayer
      @T5Zplayer 5 місяців тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣It was the EU who forced us to clean up our rivers and beaches in the first place.

    • @Celtictribes
      @Celtictribes 5 місяців тому +7

      Considering that most EU countries are voting for "right wing" parties your "point" is pointless.

    • @El.Cid17
      @El.Cid17 5 місяців тому +2

      Brexit is fantastic.

    • @stequality
      @stequality 5 місяців тому

      ​@@El.Cid17lol

    • @El.Cid17
      @El.Cid17 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@stequalityName anything that's wrong with it???????

  • @nicolass7102
    @nicolass7102 5 місяців тому

    Brexit benefit

    • @Celtictribes
      @Celtictribes 5 місяців тому

      Oh grow up ! The whole of Europe is turning to right wing parties is that Brexit as well ? Or just common sense in reaction to relentless socialist. nonsense.

    • @El.Cid17
      @El.Cid17 5 місяців тому

      Move to Europe or shut up.

    • @El.Cid17
      @El.Cid17 5 місяців тому +3

      Brexit is done, and fantastic, GET OVER IT.

    • @stequality
      @stequality 5 місяців тому

      ​@@El.Cid17brexit has made London safe .....

    • @El.Cid17
      @El.Cid17 5 місяців тому

      ​@@stequalitySix million Europeans there.

  • @aaronmason9332
    @aaronmason9332 5 місяців тому +1

    No1 earns that salary. It is pure greed. Same as yourself...greedy journalists.

  • @sorielle7060
    @sorielle7060 5 місяців тому +1

    In the meantime, the people have to make sacrifices to save the planet. How is this not ludicrous.
    We need immediate political changes, these boufons need to go

  • @dangerousfables
    @dangerousfables 5 місяців тому +2

    I blame Thatcher.

  • @CockWomble1000
    @CockWomble1000 5 місяців тому +1

    The filth and the con job