@@syedashobnam2573 best joke huh ? But dont worry Israel-Turkey relations were formalized in March 1949, when Turkey was the first Muslim majority country to recognize the State of Israel. Continue watching trt 😂
@@fayesk1304 the Ottoman government was literally in the middle of committing 3 genocides when the British showed up, and half the Arabs were revolting. The empire had already been crumbling for over a century at that point.
@@robfl100 the ottoman 'genocides' are a mix of exaggeration and invention of the West. They fail to teach their own people the massacres of the crusaders and the Colonial rule.
Mohamed Tarek not the countries that didn’t accept the partition and attacked the new partitioned state. They were Islamic countries as well as the Islamic countries from which 950,000 Jews were expelled from and persecuted from the 1920s-1970s. Islam and the Arab world shared the same Ideology and philosophies as Hitler and the Nazis in pursuit of exterminating the Jews. Today they’re a continuation of Hitler’s failed scheme and motive.
Indeed. Arabs talk about a "Arab homeland"... Which one? As there are numerous Arab nations littering the Middleeast. They demand prefferential treatment in everything no matter what atrocities they commit. They collaborated with the Axis during WW2 with the agenda of exterminating any jews in the Middleeast. And why does this video seem rather biased in favour of Muslims?
when people talk about this war, they never mention what the Arab aims were. They stated that 'they would 'drive the Jews in the sea.' Even if you think they never actually would have done this, you have to admit that the Israelis had every right to be anxious. People also never talk about how Arabs were treating Jews in other Arab nations during this war. I'm not well read but I've heard that genocide occurred to Jews. Not to mention that Jordanians destroyed Jewish religious sites in Jerusalem. It seems as though people want to victims the arabs and blame west and Israel but Arabs seem to have a very bad track record with Jews and Christians during the 20th century. Look at genocide of 2 million Christians during WW1. There needs to be more balance.
Do you know how many atrocities have been committed by all countries/races/religions and empires throughout history, being selective doesn't prove anything so your comment has no weight what genocide are you referring too? please be specific, and your obviously forgetting about who's land was taken, Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, how would you feel if your home was taken? would you be so civil?
@@ofrikalif4938 It was both arabs and Israelities mixed together for thousands of years, their ancestors lived itogether at the time of Caanan or Judah and Israel Kingdomes, then a lot of different occupations, then at the end of the day both (arabs and jews) had different goals and ended up fighting for land they once lived in peace together. History shows that it goes usually like this: arabs attack Jews then Jews respond with greater power and arabs end up worse than before, then again and again till this very day. "It was never a Palestinian land (Palestinian land- belongs to the people which are calling themselves today as "Palestinians"). Name "Palestine" have two origins. One is 12th century Egyptian "Peleset" that meant region of todays Israel (including both Jews and Arabs) Second roots are in "Philistines" who once lived in west side of Israel (but they were actually greek conquerors that are no longer there, still the greeks later called region of todays Israel "Palestine" because of that). Now the tricky thing is that people who call themselves "palestinians" are usually arabs who think of ancient teritory of Caanan so todays Israel (including gaza and west bank) and say it's their land but both Jews and Arabs lived in this region (that can be called "palestine") together from ancient times. Long story short Jews/Israelities are actually Palestinians themselves even though it is usually that arabs call themselves that way. Back before 1967 there were common distinction on Palestinian Jews and Palestinian Arabs.
This is pretty much one-sided. 1) The arabs started the war and lost. If you start a war and fail, you pay a price. 2) There were also massacres perpetrated by the arabs against jewish civilians. 3) Most arabs fled the country not because of jewish massacres, but because the attacking arabs asked them to leave in order to avoid being stuck in the line of fire. Later, so they were promised, they could return. 4) About 150.000 Arabs stayed in the country and have since then multiplied more than tenfold.They are full israeli citizens and are treated as equals by the israeli authorities. Some even have reached high positions in the army, administration or government of the country. To be taken seriously, one must be balanced. One-sided narratives are never taken seriously.
When did the Arabs start the war? Its difficult to define when a war is started. There were massacres on both sides. I wont respond to point 3 as is it untrue as the fact that Jesus didn't exist. Define what is the country? Israel has never defined her borders and doesn't even have a constitution. I guess 'the country' that includes also 3 million Palestinians in the west Bank. Should we also include the Gazan Palestinians up till 2005?
@@deficrypto1234 That is very simple. 1 day after Ben Gurion had made his declaration of israeli independence, the armies of Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Saudi-Arabia attacked the new state in order to destroy it. Massacres, before 1948, had been carried out by arabs and jews alike, the first massacre being a massacre by the arabs against the jews. I am very well acquainted with the history of Israel.If you want to prove me wrong, you must be very good with this topic.
@@romainreuter9604 Trust me I am. I am also open to learning.Are u? U said, the Arab armies attacked the fledgling state. Provide evidence of these attacks. I want locations, dates, battles etc Also provide your sources.
@@romainreuter9604 Lets deal with your first error. U said they attacked 'to destroy it'. That I presume is based on a verbal statement. What does the evidence show? Gold Meir had signed a deal with King Abdullah in Nov 1947 to stay out of the war. They had at least two meetings and it was called the Hussein- Israeli pact. So, Jordan was offered the West bank in exchange for not participating in the conflict. This is supported by the fact that Jordan sent 9000 troops to participate in the conflict. Also, by mid May , 1948 total Israeli fighting forces (IZL) numbered 35000 while the Arabs numbered 25000. By the expulsion of Lydda and Ramle, Israel had close to 60,000 rising to almost 90,000 by the end of the war. Sorry, the historical evidence doesn't support the claim 'they wanted to destroy the state'. Israel was superior to all the Arab armies (except Jordan) in every military department and won almost every battle conclusively (Making Israel by Benny Morris). If u say u know the topic very well, ur really stating the 'old narrative' of the 'old historians. Benny Morris , Avi Shlaim, Tom Segev, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappe all disagree with u. It was just rhetoric and propaganda. The Arabs who were not united couldn't have destroyed the new state of Israel based on their fighting forces and disunity. It really was a land grab affair for the Arab forces. Kindly dont talk about intent as we cant read hearts. I am only interested in the historical evidence.
"...and the U.N two state solution? It never saw the light of day." Yes, because while the Jews reluctantly accepted the plan (including not having control over Jerusalem), the Arab nations rejected the plan and promised to 'drive the Jews into the sea'. This video does has a definite bias, I've read several books on the conflict and visited Israel three times. Both sides have their faults, but this video doesn't cover the explicit threats made by the surrounding Arab nations that they would wipe Israel off the map. The Deir Yassin massacre was terrible, so was the Hadassah Medical Convoy massacre (look it up), or going further back the Hebron Massacre in 1929. In fact, in 1948 many of the native Arab population fled from Hebron because they feared Jewish revenge because of what they had done nearly 20 years previous. Also the fact that the native Palestinians were encouraged to leave because they were told Israel would soon be defeated, and they should not get in the way of the invading Arab forces. Israeli forces on the other hand DID deliberately frighten and coerce Palestinians into leaving their ancestral lands. Like I said, both sides have their faults, but this video is too unbalanced for my liking.
Some Palestinians were encouraged to leave. However, these are the minority cases. Most of Palestine was de-Arabised before the first Arab armies invaded. Also, its just pure Rhetoric about wiping Israel off the map. There were almost equal number of fighting soldiers on the battlefield. The Arabs were in cahoot with Israel regarding carving up the territory. It was just a land grab.
Lets also substitute the term 'Jews' with European settlers. Those who were indigenous to the land had Judaism as their identifying mark. These 'Jews' who established the land didn't even believe in God. They were not indigenous to the land. That's why there up to 5 Aaliyahs (wave of immigration) with both the Ottomans and British putting immigration restrictions on the 'Jews'. Also, according to Benny Morris, it was the 'fear of territorial displacement, that was the chief motor of Arab/Palestinian resistance'. This was in built into political Zionism.
@@MrCmon113 I deleted my comment, maybe I understood in a another way a while ago,It was a very long comment but I dont know why I replied that way back then,accept my apologies.
Ahmed Kadim , why are you trying to explain history to someone who has never tried to read a history book except some videos on UA-cam and even only those videos in which Muslims didn't win .
Umer Haroon إن شاء الله ,Allah will bring justice , they will suffer in hell for all what they did to us, brother, we just have to be patient , until the right time comes , AND NO REGRET WILL BRING THEM BACK ,الله أكبر
There's a mistake in this video at 1:25. That frame shows a picture of bodies lined up in rows and the voice over and CC indicate it is Deir Yassin. While the massacre at Deir Yassin was very real and documented even by Zionist forces, an uncontestable event, the photo shown is not from Deir Yassin. That image is a reproduction of a photo taken by the Army Signal Corps of a German concentration camp called Dachau. This image is widely misused like this, unfortunately this misuse has been used by Nakba deniers to undermine the truth.
it's not "uncontestable". That is an insane thing to say about any historical event. Deir Yassin there was an event, but it's not at all universally agreed on what happened.
@@paulrob55 In that the Nazis were greatly successful in extermination of the Jewish population across Europe, lowering the total population from 11 Million in Jan of 1942 to around 5 Million by 1945. The Palestinians population has gone from 1.1 million in 1960 to almost 6 million in 2020.
Failed to mention that after the Arabs rejected the UN partition, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, and the Arabs in Israel joined forces to destroy the reclaimed and partitioned State of Israel and the Jews.
@@goovialisticprofunks the Partition Plan was seen as unfavorable by both the Arabs and Israelis. Israel rejected the plan as well, and have continued to reject it to this day, whereas many Arab leaders have tried to renegotiate implementing the Partition.
To protect Arab palastine??? So why didn't they create a palastinian state with the land they annexed??? Egypt annexed the Gaza strip, and Jordan annexed the the west bank
Jake Gold Curiously enough that Jordan is the one that is pushing for the creation of a palestinian state in the UN even though they did not even consider this viability when they owned the land.
@@jakegold5495 In Jordan? hell they are second class citizens even in Palestinian authorities in the west bank. They are second class even among their own people.
@Ali But all that I said is futile because, in the way you perceive the world, you do not belong to this world. You are some sort of a creature from outer space. How can you come out with a delusional proclamation "illegal??? .... occupied?? according to which legal system??
They weren’t interested in building the state. They were interested in killing all their Jewish neighbors instead as they didn’t accept any land by the UN unless the Jews were killed as they say from then river to the sea. Islam can’t live side by side with Jews. But Jews accept Islam and give them full freedom to practice their Islam in Israel.
Quite inaccurate at times. On the one hand, how can you explain a 100-year old conflict in 5 mins, but on the other, how can there be so much inaccuracy in just 5 mins? Jordan wasn't gifted the West Bank, it invaded and occupied as a durect threat to the fledgling Jewish state. Ben Gurion announced the Stae of Israel on 14 May 1948, the local Arabs promptly attacked on 15 May and in nearly all cases got driven back despite superior manpower and weaponry. The list goes on.
Look up Plan Dalet which started April 5th with the objective to depopulate the land of it's natives and you will find out that Israel stole much more land than they intended to depopulate the land of the natives.
@@callummcmac4079 This is the West Bank to which you're referring, I was talking about Israel. But yes Israel is land-grabbing in the West Bank; part of the difficulty is that Jews have lived there continuously for 4000 years, contrary to the common narrative. Don't take me for an Israeli though. I am profoundly concerned at how they are managing this situation.
Wow, no way was this video unfair to Israel and completely in accurate. I've studied history for 22 years and while you were accurate on alot, you left out a whole lot more.
One of friend who is an Arab-American muslim from mixed Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry once distributed food packets and medicines across Brooklyn including in the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighbourhoods Just saying, we are all good
I'm chilean, and the arabs are an important part of our culture heritage. People may make offensive jokes, but when the discussion becomes serious everyone agrees that the arabs are mostly good people.
To young people watching this, there are no Palestinians yet prior to 1948. Only Jews, Arabs, Bedouins, Armenians, Turks, Greeks, etc peopling the land. And it was the Ottomans who held all present day Israel before the end of WW1. The editors of TRT might still reminiscing the glory of Istanbul.
I’m looking for stories of Egyptians who were in the 1948 war. I doubt any veterans are still alive (but let me know if I’m wrong!), but their families and friends have stories and memories which should be shared.
Well if you want actual fact, this channel are a no-no. If you want some biased pro-islam false conclusion of information, here is many, good for laughing. Neutral media= DW, BBC, VICE Biased Pro muslim media= TRT, JAZEERA. Sorry but it just the truth.
@@mantosh56 yeah i start to realize lately that bbc kinda bias against right wing party but mostly they are neutral. Although, for me DW are the most neutral media i have ever found, their journalist are very good. My opinion though.
@@idono5935 Did check some of DWs content...seems allright ig though heard some critisism about them from some forums still from what i could see DWs not bad....But BBC...ugh
The way the reporter pronounce the name Iraq and Gaza give away the biased approach of this video which full with gaps concealing Arabs responsibility for their situation. Great job real reporter work!
This video is simply disrespecting people's intelligence !! The internet is full of videos that explain the conflict in a neutral way with the aim of educating! This channel thinks he's the only one who knows the truth!
@Clevera 1008 Turks and arabs are two VERY, VERY different things. If you'd like to educate yourself more I'd like to point to krauts 3 part, 4 hour (in total) documentary series on the history of the turks. Its very interesting, like, legit way more than I thought it would be
To put it into context - the Arab States did not attack Israel to "protect Palestine". There's no honor among theives. They wanted the territory for themselves. Jordan occupied the wb and had 50% parliamentary representation from it. Egypt maintained brutal control over Gaza. At the Lausanne Conference they proposed to divide the Negev in order to "maintain Arab continuity". The had 19 years from 1947 to 1968 to create a "Palestinian State" but did absolutely nothing. The claim is an utter sham.
So the Arab nations started a war. They could not win. The Jews won. Ok remind us what is the problem here? The bully loses and then complains they are oppressed. The events you call massacres happend as part of combat which the Arab states started. Please go back to high school and learn something.
Most of jews in palestine are from poland, they are not from the land, its not about the religion, its about who live there, and its arabs who lived there, arab jews, muslims and christians, Not european migrants that people say they are "jews" it doenst natter if they are jews or not, they dont have the right to take over the land
@@Cupid_AJ so if only the Jews already there established the state of Israel without Jews from Poland you will accept it? Since Israel was created by UN if UN said only Jews already there, would you accept or you will still attack it?
There is a “Palestinian” state it’s called Jordan. The Arabs gambled in 1948 and lost now you must deal with the consequences, only when you love your children more than you hate the Jews will there be peace.
First of all, you're quoting Golda, who believed in a superior race and spoke openly abt extermination?! Also, it's surprising you're writing this bc it's not brought up as a point anymore: nobody who reads brings up the "war" b/c that's been refuted. Look up what really happened in 1948. This alone should show you the Arabs in the area, if really wanted to fight, would've stepped in 1946-47, when word of the first mass acres and expulsions were happening. At that time 200,000 Pales tinians were expelled. Read abt it from different sources. In 1948, there was no "war" of combatants vs. combatants, and no historian now denies this. What really happened is the "Arabs" (what is that exactly? Sudanese speak Arabic and they are "black") weren't interested in fighting, ill-prepared (every history book, no matter the persuasion, says this, yes, fewer in combatants), and rearraging themselves after colonialism. They were simply responding to the massacres happening in the villages next door! Village by village, the Ha ganah and Irgun plundered and massacred it's inhabitants. Heck, even mainstream Isre aelis will point this out, and so do historians. So your comment is not only inaccurate, it shows you deny what's really happening. Torture in prisons, raids in refugee camps, massacres, like the Flour Massacre (again, every news organization covered this-now undeniable). Being on the right side of history takes bravery-you can be one of them!
Who drew first blood? Is it an aggressive act when the European Jew Zionist settlers expelled the indigenous Arab population? I presume ur ignoring that point. Would you see it as an act of war if I and my cohorts came and expelled you from your home land? The minute the Zonists started the plan, they drew first blood.
x b because they were about to win, then the UN declared a seize fire. Then Israel imported a bunch of tanks and fire power (which the UN said not to do, but Israel completely ignored it). So Palestine would of won, but the UN basically let Israel win.
@david guez No but there was no a country named Palestine, it was an independent state with its own government during the British colonization. And after the 1948 the west bank was part of Jordan to not lose it against the Zionist militias
@@rro3924 It was a state but not a country? Lets refresh our definition of country. Country- a nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory. Palestine was definitely a country.
A lot of things left unsaid by this video, particularly the fact that there was no mention of the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees expelled by the Arab nations upon the creation of Israel.
@@Thepotato-mo1jh Jews lived peacefully in many predominantly Muslim countries, for the most part as equal citizens. The trouble began with the Zionist takeover of Palestine.
By 1948, arab and jewish tension had reached an unprecedented level, with the arab nations proclaiming themselves as muslim nations, and the jews living in those arab nations never feeling like they were a part of the population, they fled. Arab governments didn’t really help with appeasing their fears, and instead agreed with the expulsion of their own jewish people into Israel.
You have no idea how much i appreciate this UA-cam channel. Thank you for many videos informing viewers (specifically Americans) about what goes on, and what has happened around the world. Thank You. I hope to go to Turkey one day :)
If this particular video is in any way representative for the channel then you probably should look elsewhere for your information. The narrative that they present is so stupid. They tell the story of how multiple Arab states attack and tried to destroy Israel and then blame Israel for the fact that there is no "Palestinian " state. Can't you see how utterly ridiculous that is?
"small country".... lets rephrase it. "So to protect palestine, all the Arab countries still recovering came together and attacked a country supplied by the west with additional leftover equipment from the british. that sounds about right." See how its disengenuous?
@@S0me0ne353 so the two faced countries got together and attacked a small country without thinking about the consequences? That sounds similar to the current situation. The innocent Palestinian should’ve and should be begging the Egyptian government to give them a refugee status until the IDF takes out the filthy trash that are currently hiding behind children and women. Before ww2 the British government were the owners of this land and once they left they created two states thinking the Muslim and the Jews would live peacefully. Unfortunately that was a worthless dream. The Israeli government were also trying for the two states but the two faced people wanted everything for themselves. The two faced people have so much land in that area. Why can’t they just give the Jews that land and let them live in peace.
@@S0me0ne353 the Arabs didn’t want a Jewish state. Jews after their holocaust wanted a place where they could live and protect themselves from the next nazi’s. Funny how the Quran talks about Israel and their land around 40 times and Palestine 0. It’s their land which is backed by the Quran.
Palestinians were not driven out they were promised by the cowering Arab nations to eliminate the Jewish state out of existence. God was on the side of the truth and we know who won that war. I salute the Israelis who defended their country and protected their people.
"Avi Shlaim says...Avi Shalim says...Avi Shlaim says..." - so what if he says??...many people say a lot of 'things'...so what?..if they say those things does it mean that the truth is out?!?..haha not at all... And 1 example that pops up right now is how Arafat, during the Oslo accords, committed to that "the PLO renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence and will assume responsibility over all PLO elements and personnel in order to assure their compliance, prevent violations and discipline violators" but, at the very same day of the Oslo accords signing (13 September 1993), on Jordanian TV, he notified everyone that the Oslo accords is nothing more than a part of the 'PLO's Ten Point Program' (see Wikipedia). In other instances Arafat compared the Oslo accords with the 'Treaty of Hudaybiyyah' (Johannesburg 1994 and Cairo 1995) and in Stockholm 1996 he said "we are planning to eliminate Israel completely". Wait, but this is completely the opposite to his Oslo accord commitment of "renouncing the use of terrorism and other acts of violence". So many people say a lot of 'things'... For the rest, regarding this completely twisted video, one needs to search it very carefully in order to be able to 'fish out' the very few truthful things that are said in it!...
Is that "2000" years with or without the 900+ some odd years that got jumped in the last "2,000" years? 🤔 Pretty convenient if you ask me. Almost like rewriting reality to fit the prophecy like we're seeing today.
he bodies in 1:24 is not from Dier Yassin, it is a picture of Jews from the Holocaust. What can you expect from a 'news' owned by the government of TURKEY?
Dir Yassin was not a massacre, but an Urban battle with the Irgun and Lehi on one side, and Iraqi soldiers and Arab irregulars on the other. It was mythologized as "a massacre" both by the Arabs, and by Ben Gurion's government who wanted to discredit the Irgun and Lehi.
I suppose u were there and in a better position to decide it wasn't a massacre compared to eye witnesses? What evidence do u have that it wasn't a massacre?
@@adhamabuirtaimeh7410 ok and that gives you more credit? That makes you just as biased and not neutral as an israeli. Then again, I am an israeli so I guess I just killed my own point
@@k.k8791 There are two sides to the conflict. The Jews were determined to claim a place where they could feel secure, and they opted for part of their ancestral homeland on offer via the Balfour Declaration. The Arabs west of the Jordan River were freaked out by the large numbers of Jewish immigrants turning up. Two understandable positions. If you insist on one side being right and the other being wrong, plenty of narratives are available for each side. But if you want to actually understand the situation you need to read both sides. Try to avoid those accounts loaded with hyperbole. Those are geared to inflame passion rather than provide insight.
@cristop5 I'm an arab and i was with the Israeli side for years but when i started looking at history from an unbiased view i knew it's just a new colonial movement...it's a weak excuse to say my grandfather 3000 yrs ago lived here it's actually a cery stupid one cause that means the red indians should take theirand back from the Americans and the Persian take most of the middle east... and the other reason that made me switch sides is how Israel came to be ..they imported a massive numbers of extremists that started committing unspeakable Massacres and crimes and tantura is one of them ..they started burning villages and killing people from day one .. ane this is all admitted by veteran Israeli soldiers and they're proud of these crimes
Almost a month prior to the establishment of the State of Israel, wealthy palestinians started sending their relatives out of the country in anticipation of the Arabs attack. Additional people fled when the fighting started without ever seeing an Israeli soldier After the war, Arabs that remained were offered citizenship in Israel. Some became citizens, others stayed without becoming citizens. The Arab countries then deported over a million Jews living in their country to Israel.
Who cares about this anecdote. The vast majority were not these wealthy people you speak of. The Jews ethnically cleansed Palestine. Either deny that fact or dont say anything.
YOU SHOWED HELICOPTERS GIVEN TO ISRAEL IN 1948?????? You have got to be kidding me. This shows a complete lack of a basic understanding of both this conflict and history at large.
RIP To the 6,373 Israeli soldiers and civilians, 3,700-7,000 Arab soldiers, and 3,000-13,000 Palestinian Arab fighters and civilians who were killed in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War
@@Qingeaton hey...if Czechs helped Israel in 1948 then why did they supplied arms to Arabs in 1967 six day way....in 6 day war Israel got ammunitions from French n US. any idea?
Egypt and Jordan had the territory to establish a "Palestinian" state but never thought about it. Egypt controlled Gaza with military rule. Jordan kept the palestine Arabs in camps- as did the other Arab countries. 700,000 Palestine refugees fred Israel, but 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries and absorbed in Israel. Over 2 million Jews were absorbed by the tiny, brandnew state with 600,000 residents to begin with. Now, 75 years later- where are the Jews from Arab lands? They have homes and jobs. Are in all professions and influence Israel's politics. The Palestine refugees have been kept for three generations. The Nakba is NOT ON ISRAEL. IT IS ON THE ARAB STATES. shame on all of you.
The nakba means catastrophe... And by that they meant that Jews were not annhilated... The 700000 Palestinians fled and had nowhere to return to because Israel won and didn't want to live with people who wanted to kill them... So you are right... The arbs are at fault here and so are the Palestinians... They are crying after losing the war they started
People/Countries away ally with the Person/Country which have Power and here Israel is the most powerful country so all Countries including China, Russia, Japan, India and EU will support Israel... Palestine is nothing but a imagination!
When even the british can't contains the violence of arab and jews, i imagine the Arabs side as Hamas cruel extremist and Jew side as Racist IDF extremist. Both are the same
This war shouldn't never happen. The Arabs were better by accept the UN 2 states solutions and help Palestinian to build a new Palestine state. 🇵🇸. All nations wanted to see Jews and Palestinian living side by side in their own lands peaceful
Consistent with this being a Turkish-run channel, it was of course one sided. Nothing is mentioned of the Palestinian Arabs rejecting the two-state solution that was offered them. No context given to the Dir Yassin massacre (within the larger Operation Nachshon), no mention of the same number of Jews being driven out of Arab countries. One sided Muslim drivel. Read Benny Morris' "1948" for a fair and two-sided account.
We'll probably because she's Arab... It matches pretty well also with how biased that video was, probably a palestinian who has history in this place...
Worth pointing out that in the UN partitioning about half of the land granted to Israel was the Negev desert which is basically inhabitable. The Arabs should have taken the deal. In addition, no guarantee the Arabs would have created a new state. More than likely they would have fought amongst themselves on how to carve it up.
Very inaccurate. There were plans to settle long before the fictious 2-state. It was all a ploy for the cameras. Look up what the Mad Professor says about this. As a matter of fact, the initial plan was 55% of the land and a UN designated capitol. Did this happen? No, b/c they wanted to be an explicit majority, so underground groups, including the I rgun, engaged in tactics to expel, including mas sacres. Look up videos of soldiers discussing this-they don't hide it. So, why are you commenting? Why don't you read from different sources, compare notes, see videos, then post?
I will never understand why the Arabs did not agree to peaceful and prosperous Israeli rule. They chose conflict. They chose hell. They chose Gaza. Why?
why?? this *hadith is the source of all this hatred & conflict in that region: Allah's Messenger (Mohammed) said: "The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them all until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews". (Sahih Muslim 2292) *hadith is collection of traditions containing sayings of the profet Mohammed
@@zackdeew9757 I no longer think this is about religion. I now think that Hamas is a criminal group whose primary wish is to r*pe children. I think Hamas is a p*dophile organisation. Those tunnels were constructed so that perverts could snatch Israeli children and take them down there. We KNOW that Hamas pervs grabbed children.
The lesson is to Stop Attacking Israel . Reject the three No ‘s of Khartoum and replace them with ‘Yes’ to Recognition, Peace and Negotiation with Israel . After 76 yrs of attacking Israel the Palestinians must by now understand that violence gets them nowhere , Egypt and Jordan have signed peace treaties with Israel , the Palestinians should follow suit
Why doesn't TRT talk about the Armenian genocide, committed in the same time period? Oh I forgot, mentioning the genocide in Turkey is a capital offence..
this video covers so many important events and then seamlessly moves on to the next one making it seem like they're interrelated but it's much more complex than that and anybody looking for answers will only be confused by this video. If you want to know more take note of the important names and dates that she meant mentions in this video and go look them up independently each one has significance in their era but are less important today if ones goal is a peaceful end to this geopolitical tragedy. Fun fact the 1948 Arab Congress pledged to 'drive the Jews into the sea' and they also started what became the modern BDS movement at the same 1948 meeting.
Well, truth is in action and the invaders are constantly driving the natives into the sea. Exactly how many native villages and towns did Israel burn down/destroy? Every time Israel takes over a Palestinian street only Jews can walk on this street. Israelis are slowly driving the natives into the sea.
It was actually the Zionists who drove indigenous people into the sea, many of whose descendants now are forced to live in refugee camps. Here's a question: why are they still in refugee camps, by the millions, after 74 years? I'll wait . . . .
JEWISH NAKBA 800,000 Arab Jews forced to flee homes, business, money, properties, mistresses, the whole nine yards in supersonic speed (mind you) to avoid looming pogroms by affectionate, cuddly… albeit genocidal demented Arab mobs of demonic inclinations
My grandpa fought in both wars as a Navy General. Unfortunately he passed away long before I was born, so my knowledge on his story is very limited, beyond the fact that he fought in both wars, and in his second tour (in the 70s), his ship was targetted by some sort of missile which took him and his crew members out of the battle. I’m guessing that would have been the Battle of Baltim, but I don’t know for sure. He survived, but was on a cane for what remained of his life. Wish I knew more than that.
Very biased video. Yes, the Arabs did reject the partition then cry when they claim they are being kept from a Palestinian state. They've been offered a state time and time again. Most of the Jewish settlements were purchased legally at high prices from Arab land owners. The Jews then worked the land. They worked it hard and improved it. So what Palestinians owned what lands? Secondly, who are the Palestinians? Most are refugees resettled there in the past few decades prior to 1948 in order to have Arabs on the land. Many were hired labor from Syria, Iraq, and other countries, moved there to work on land owned by absentee Arab landlords, many of who sold their land to Jewish settlements. There just were very few national Palestinians except Bedouins who, by the way, sided with the Jews and became Israeli citizens after 1948, if you check your history. Finally, what about the Palestinian refugees? Has the surrounding Arab countries done much to help? Most were kept in camps and made second class residents, often not allowed out of those camps. Most of those camps still exist today.
The Palestinians have never been offered a 'State'. A state involves control of your own borders, resources with your own independent fighting force and opportunities to participate in international agencies and trade agreements.. I challenge anyone to present when that was ever offered to any Palestinian representative. Any evidence?
One must remember that beginning at March 1947 (from Cairo) throughout the entire 1948 war, Jews whose families lived in the Arabs states of the ME for Millenia had their bank accounts confiscated, property vandalized and eventually deported with one briefcase. There were 811,000 such ppl, just in the 1948 war. the deportations continued after the war, last was from Libya in 1972. Overall around 1.2M Jews were deported.
@@_.belladonna_ "Genocide" is a curious word to describe a process where a group of people who are actually descendants of Jews who converted to Islam, multiply 40 fold. And yes, it did not start in 1948. The war actually started in 1920 with the Mufti declaration of a Jihad against the Jews. That was well before the Arabs have decided that the "Arab Palestinians" are a nation (who cannot even pronounce its name properly, they say "filistin").
@@_.belladonna_ Just to be clear on that - the "Arab Palestinian nation" was invented in Jan. 1964 in the first Arab summit in Cairo. Prior to that, there were no "Arab Palestinians" as the word "Palestinian" was a derogatory pronoun describing a Jew from the holy land - and it's been that way ever since Hadrian.
Peace can never be when you have an aparheid state system, if you want peace you should start by giving people the same right, Zionist when created Israel by stealing Palestiniens land don't want Palestiniens on this land let alone give them the same rights as jewsh..
It's about people trying to feel better than each other. If everyone was truly CHRIST like... they would LOVE EVERYONE. ❤ but yet... they kill in the NAME OF RELIGION
Aggressors in war who loses are supposed to concede territories to the victors. Just ask Germany and Japan how WWII worked out for them. Germany in particular lost so much land it was ridiculous.
First, let's deal with this. The UN Adopted UN Res. 181, the Arabs overwhelmingly rejected this plan, so no division of the land was agreed to; it was rejected by all the Arabs. Thus, to act like this has any bearing on how the land is set up now is silly. To have an agreement, both parties have to agree, or the agreement is null and void. And atrocities? Ah, you mean the Arabs attacked the Jews? Then, after seeing the British refused to protect them, they set up self-defense gangs who attacked back when attacked. Let's deal with the second point of misinformation here. Arabs were led not by Arabs; they were led by British officers who did not want an independent Israeli nation; I suggest you Google a Lt. Gen. Glubb. Regarding the UN cease-fire, the UN demanded all sides, not arm, the British were arming the Arabs during the cease-fire, to act like Israel was the only party that was doing this is nonsense. And Jordan was never gifted the West Bank; they occupied and tried to annex it, that was Israeli land. Amazing how this was left out too.
Before the war: "We will not give the Jews any land. We reject this two-state partition and we want all of the land. Drive out all the Jews! " After the war: " Please respect the two-state partition and don't encroach into our land. Please don't drive us out of Palestine 👉👈🥺"
Ok, this video is not that misleading as I expected it to be. Though it still has some "anti" somebody (it doesn't really mean, against whom the Arabs or Israelis, however, it has a stance against Israel.), it still presents a lot of valuable information, at least much more valuable than I expected. But let's go through the points that are probably wrong, at least to my knowledge: 1) The west bank and eastern Jerusalem, were not given to Jordan as a "gift" (when did you see that in the world's history? It is not the way the politics work.), instead we have to mention the fact, that Palestine was under Jordanian rule during the British mandate, in fact, the name of Jordan, at first was - Transjordan, as it was a bridge upon the "Jordan River". 2) They didn't mention the interests of the Arab states in the war. They mentioned Egypt and I guess Jordan, but that's all. So, Egyptian policy was to create a United Arab State (which they actually, created in 1961 with Syria, although Syria withdrew it in 1962, after a military coup took place, however, still Egypt's name was "The United Arab Republic", if I'm not wrong, up until 1971.). Next, Syrian point, was that in the past, during the Ottoman rule, the territories of the Lebanese mountains, Palestine-Israel region and what we know today as "Jordan", were all part of Syrian eyalet in Ottoman Empire, so the Syrians always wanted to dominate all of these regions, as in 1977 (during a coup attempt in Jordan*. Supported by the U.S*), Syrians moved their forces to Jordan in an attempt to probably establish their dominance. Or as they entered Lebanese Civil War and kept troops in Lebanon up until 2005. So, they saw Palestine as a Historical Syrian land as well. 3) By the way, Jordanians always had an understanding with the Israelis, as they had some problems with the Palestinians.
It’s so difficult to get an unbiased view on this, especially with someone like myself who’s an outsider looking in, trying to get an understanding on the subject. Don’t know where to properly get info and it seems like a tug of war
@@Flatbush21rst Well I wouldn't rely on this 5-min vid Flatbush, it's full of anti-Israeli bias and inaccuracies - eg "the Arab League was established to establish a homeland for the Palestinians" - wrong, it was established to wipe out the Jews - but that's not me saying that, the AL leaders of the day stated it themselves, it's in the written historic record
@@jnturner506 wow, thank you for the clarity. I guess I would have to look more in-depth, even with what’s presented in front of me. Appreciate the heads up
The fact of the matter is - Israel is not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better on democracy, technology, human rights and statehood than all its neighbours.
It might be better on technology ,but Israel should not even have the right to talk about human rights. It is not a single bit better than its neighbours. Forcing native people out of their homes and killing them? then wondering why they are fighting back. The history of Palestine is a tragic one it did not start 2 months ago. Hamas might be a terror organization but Israel and the west craeted these monsters . These people want their revenge they want their homes back. If the west never denied its jewish brother's and sisters if they would have lived peacefully together their would have never been a reason to create a home for european jewish people in a land that is already home to Palestinians in the middle east.
@@ifrahismael781 that’s a bit disingenuous ottoman leader sold the land to Israel, so you know that’s like saying if I buy a house there’s a squatter in it I have no right to kick him out cuz he was there 1st. 2nd- Arabs liberation army was lead by Fawzi al-Qawuqji who served with the ss, so that’s kinda iffy aswell.
AND WHAT DID TURKEY DO : Israel-Turkey relations were formalized in March 1949, when Turkey was the first Muslim majority country to recognize the State of Israel
Christ is King
@@syedashobnam2573 it's their land not yours.
@@Jnaga199 israel never existed it was a land called Palestine that was occupied by Jews.
@@syedashobnam2573 best joke huh ? But dont worry Israel-Turkey relations were formalized in March 1949, when Turkey was the first Muslim majority country to recognize the State of Israel.
Continue watching trt 😂
👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
@@sakuartsproduction33 bruh, if Israel wanted, they could wipe Palestine from the world.
1:10 Lol UK "abstained" from voting. Didn't want to get involved with the mess it made.
The UK with all their backbiting and double talk to both sides. The British have done more to cause strife everywhere they went.
more like the ottoman mess they didn't create and tried to clean up
@@robfl100 there was no ottoman mess. Why try to hide British mess?
@@fayesk1304 the Ottoman government was literally in the middle of committing 3 genocides when the British showed up, and half the Arabs were revolting. The empire had already been crumbling for over a century at that point.
@@robfl100 the ottoman 'genocides' are a mix of exaggeration and invention of the West. They fail to teach their own people the massacres of the crusaders and the Colonial rule.
If you go to war you risk losing everything
Islamists don’t mind, they’re suicidal.
@@goovialisticprofunks
Surprisingly to the arab states were not islamic as you could see now
Most were secular socialist countries!
Mohamed Tarek not the countries that didn’t accept the partition and attacked the new partitioned state. They were Islamic countries as well as the Islamic countries from which 950,000 Jews were expelled from and persecuted from the 1920s-1970s. Islam and the Arab world shared the same Ideology and philosophies as Hitler and the Nazis in pursuit of exterminating the Jews. Today they’re a continuation of Hitler’s failed scheme and motive.
Mohamed Tarek yes, exept for the fact that it is not true
@@mtraa.942 Socialism was just a mask to acquire weapons from the Soviets but the real ideology behind this war was Arab nationalism.
Why can't people tell this story without massive bias and omission?
stop watching turkish TRT it is flat propaganda and lies and half lies
Jeronimo Romero Bravo..I see here a lot of omissions !!
@@valentinadifirenze7027 it is brainwashing !
@@bartversteege2910 America news and sources are equally brainwashing if not even more.
@@eliahaj6503 only arab news tells the truth
In a nutshell the Arabs lost the war they started, and strangely not wanting to pay the price
Indeed.
Arabs talk about a "Arab homeland"... Which one? As there are numerous Arab nations littering the Middleeast.
They demand prefferential treatment in everything no matter what atrocities they commit.
They collaborated with the Axis during WW2 with the agenda of exterminating any jews in the Middleeast.
And why does this video seem rather biased in favour of Muslims?
@Kyle Vapelinski
Maybe.... but they still got everything.
this is the most accurate statement made regarding this post... and the most obvious to any history buff.
@Kyle Vapelinski That is a lie. The Arabs attacked Isreal, how did they start it?
how did they start a war?
when people talk about this war, they never mention what the Arab aims were. They stated that 'they would 'drive the Jews in the sea.' Even if you think they never actually would have done this, you have to admit that the Israelis had every right to be anxious. People also never talk about how Arabs were treating Jews in other Arab nations during this war. I'm not well read but I've heard that genocide occurred to Jews. Not to mention that Jordanians destroyed Jewish religious sites in Jerusalem. It seems as though people want to victims the arabs and blame west and Israel but Arabs seem to have a very bad track record with Jews and Christians during the 20th century. Look at genocide of 2 million Christians during WW1. There needs to be more balance.
What you wrote is just the tip of the iceberg...
Jews literally used to rape arab children wdym
Yeah, put a cut off date and never mentin Kingdom Of Jerusalem wrested from Muslims by European Christians during the First Crusade
Do you know how many atrocities have been committed by all countries/races/religions and empires throughout history, being selective doesn't prove anything so your comment has no weight what genocide are you referring too? please be specific, and your obviously forgetting about who's land was taken, Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, how would you feel if your home was taken? would you be so civil?
@@ofrikalif4938 It was both arabs and Israelities mixed together for thousands of years, their ancestors lived itogether at the time of Caanan or Judah and Israel Kingdomes, then a lot of different occupations, then at the end of the day both (arabs and jews) had different goals and ended up fighting for land they once lived in peace together. History shows that it goes usually like this: arabs attack Jews then Jews respond with greater power and arabs end up worse than before, then again and again till this very day.
"It was never a Palestinian land (Palestinian land- belongs to the people which are calling themselves today as "Palestinians").
Name "Palestine" have two origins. One is 12th century Egyptian "Peleset" that meant region of todays Israel (including both Jews and Arabs)
Second roots are in "Philistines" who once lived in west side of Israel (but they were actually greek conquerors that are no longer there, still the greeks later called region of todays Israel "Palestine" because of that). Now the tricky thing is that people who call themselves "palestinians" are usually arabs who think of ancient teritory of Caanan so todays Israel (including gaza and west bank) and say it's their land but both Jews and Arabs lived in this region (that can be called "palestine") together from ancient times. Long story short Jews/Israelities are actually Palestinians themselves even though it is usually that arabs call themselves that way. Back before 1967 there were common distinction on Palestinian Jews and Palestinian Arabs.
This is pretty much one-sided.
1) The arabs started the war and lost. If you start a war and fail, you pay a price.
2) There were also massacres perpetrated by the arabs against jewish civilians.
3) Most arabs fled the country not because of jewish massacres, but because the attacking arabs asked them to leave in order to avoid being stuck
in the line of fire. Later, so they were promised, they could return.
4) About 150.000 Arabs stayed in the country and have since then multiplied more than tenfold.They are full israeli citizens and are treated as
equals by the israeli authorities. Some even have reached high positions in the army, administration or government of the country.
To be taken seriously, one must be balanced. One-sided narratives are never taken seriously.
When did the Arabs start the war? Its difficult to define when a war is started. There were massacres on both sides. I wont respond to point 3 as is it untrue as the fact that Jesus didn't exist. Define what is the country? Israel has never defined her borders and doesn't even have a constitution. I guess 'the country' that includes also 3 million Palestinians in the west Bank. Should we also include the Gazan Palestinians up till 2005?
I am stlll awaiting evidence the Arabs started the war. Any?
@@deficrypto1234 That is very simple.
1 day after Ben Gurion had made his declaration of israeli independence, the armies of Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Saudi-Arabia attacked the new state in order to destroy it.
Massacres, before 1948, had been carried out by arabs and jews alike, the first massacre being a massacre by the arabs
against the jews.
I am very well acquainted with the history of Israel.If you want to prove me wrong, you must be very good with this topic.
@@romainreuter9604 Trust me I am. I am also open to learning.Are u? U said, the Arab armies attacked the fledgling state. Provide evidence of these attacks. I want locations, dates, battles etc Also provide your sources.
@@romainreuter9604 Lets deal with your first error. U said they attacked 'to destroy it'. That I presume is based on a verbal statement. What does the evidence show? Gold Meir had signed a deal with King Abdullah in Nov 1947 to stay out of the war. They had at least two meetings and it was called the Hussein- Israeli pact. So, Jordan was offered the West bank in exchange for not participating in the conflict. This is supported by the fact that Jordan sent 9000 troops to participate in the conflict. Also, by mid May , 1948 total Israeli fighting forces (IZL) numbered 35000 while the Arabs numbered 25000. By the expulsion of Lydda and Ramle, Israel had close to 60,000 rising to almost 90,000 by the end of the war. Sorry, the historical evidence doesn't support the claim 'they wanted to destroy the state'. Israel was superior to all the Arab armies (except Jordan) in every military department and won almost every battle conclusively (Making Israel by Benny Morris). If u say u know the topic very well, ur really stating the 'old narrative' of the 'old historians. Benny Morris , Avi Shlaim, Tom Segev, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappe all disagree with u. It was just rhetoric and propaganda. The Arabs who were not united couldn't have destroyed the new state of Israel based on their fighting forces and disunity. It really was a land grab affair for the Arab forces. Kindly dont talk about intent as we cant read hearts. I am only interested in the historical evidence.
"...and the U.N two state solution? It never saw the light of day."
Yes, because while the Jews reluctantly accepted the plan (including not having control over Jerusalem), the Arab nations rejected the plan and promised to 'drive the Jews into the sea'.
This video does has a definite bias, I've read several books on the conflict and visited Israel three times. Both sides have their faults, but this video doesn't cover the explicit threats made by the surrounding Arab nations that they would wipe Israel off the map.
The Deir Yassin massacre was terrible, so was the Hadassah Medical Convoy massacre (look it up), or going further back the Hebron Massacre in 1929. In fact, in 1948 many of the native Arab population fled from Hebron because they feared Jewish revenge because of what they had done nearly 20 years previous.
Also the fact that the native Palestinians were encouraged to leave because they were told Israel would soon be defeated, and they should not get in the way of the invading Arab forces. Israeli forces on the other hand DID deliberately frighten and coerce Palestinians into leaving their ancestral lands.
Like I said, both sides have their faults, but this video is too unbalanced for my liking.
Who is a Jew from the books you've read?
Some Palestinians were encouraged to leave. However, these are the minority cases. Most of Palestine was de-Arabised before the first Arab armies invaded. Also, its just pure Rhetoric about wiping Israel off the map. There were almost equal number of fighting soldiers on the battlefield. The Arabs were in cahoot with Israel regarding carving up the territory. It was just a land grab.
Lets also substitute the term 'Jews' with European settlers. Those who were indigenous to the land had Judaism as their identifying mark. These 'Jews' who established the land didn't even believe in God. They were not indigenous to the land. That's why there up to 5 Aaliyahs (wave of immigration) with both the Ottomans and British putting immigration restrictions on the 'Jews'. Also, according to Benny Morris, it was the 'fear of territorial displacement, that was the chief motor of Arab/Palestinian resistance'. This was in built into political Zionism.
@@eliahaj6503
Why do you think this was not on the news?
@@MrCmon113 I deleted my comment, maybe I understood in a another way a while ago,It was a very long comment but I dont know why I replied that way back then,accept my apologies.
Lesson: Never start a war that you can't finish..!
You can cut half of your sentence :)
views on colonialism ?
South Africa and Algeria? hello?
Well, war to prevent your own extinction in is honor, not greed
Do not start a war that you are not able too lose
Arabs never won a war😂😂😂😂
Oh yeah? , lets go back 500 years
Ahmed Kadim , why are you trying to explain history to someone who has never tried to read a history book except some videos on UA-cam and even only those videos in which Muslims didn't win .
Umer Haroon you know , youre right , its like trying to talk to a rock , but they will learn THE HARD WAY
Umer Haroon إن شاء الله ,Allah will bring justice , they will suffer in hell for all what they did to us, brother, we just have to be patient , until the right time comes , AND NO REGRET WILL BRING THEM BACK ,الله أكبر
heran heren , language!!! You know that companions of Muhammad were Arabs too?
There's a mistake in this video at 1:25. That frame shows a picture of bodies lined up in rows and the voice over and CC indicate it is Deir Yassin. While the massacre at Deir Yassin was very real and documented even by Zionist forces, an uncontestable event, the photo shown is not from Deir Yassin. That image is a reproduction of a photo taken by the Army Signal Corps of a German concentration camp called Dachau. This image is widely misused like this, unfortunately this misuse has been used by Nakba deniers to undermine the truth.
it's not "uncontestable". That is an insane thing to say about any historical event. Deir Yassin there was an event, but it's not at all universally agreed on what happened.
What's the difference between the Nazis and Israel?
@@paulrob55 Really?
Advice 👉READ MORE
@@paulrob55 In that the Nazis were greatly successful in extermination of the Jewish population across Europe, lowering the total population from 11 Million in Jan of 1942 to around 5 Million by 1945. The Palestinians population has gone from 1.1 million in 1960 to almost 6 million in 2020.
@@paulrob55 You meant to ask what's the difference between nazis and Hamas anti-semitic jihadist? *Nothing.*
Propaganda takes many forms, so many inaccurate in this video, send my regards to Erdogan
Daniel Marcovich lol how is this propaganda, dont like the truth?
Failed to mention that after the Arabs rejected the UN partition, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, and the Arabs in Israel joined forces to destroy the reclaimed and partitioned State of Israel and the Jews.
goovialisticprofunks exactly.
You might be the addict of the propaganda world of western media. No worries, facing the truth is hard
@@goovialisticprofunks the Partition Plan was seen as unfavorable by both the Arabs and Israelis. Israel rejected the plan as well, and have continued to reject it to this day, whereas many Arab leaders have tried to renegotiate implementing the Partition.
The first cease-fire occurred after an Arab defeat. And they were importing arms from the Soviet block during all this time. Come on!
sld1776 no they weren’t, they didn’t meet with the Soviets until after the war
@@mustafaraysalih You don't need to 'meet' to sell arms, Einstein.
@@sld1776 bruh ur waffling so much just shut up and admit your country is on occupied land
@@vipermufc1589 Huh? My country is the United States. And I'm not your bro.
@@mustafaraysalih So you used your own non existent arms?
To protect Arab palastine??? So why didn't they create a palastinian state with the land they annexed??? Egypt annexed the Gaza strip, and Jordan annexed the the west bank
Jake Gold
Curiously enough that Jordan is the one that is pushing for the creation of a palestinian state in the UN even though they did not even consider this viability when they owned the land.
@@nurieln not only that, to this day, palastinian refugees in jurdan are basically second class citizens in jurdan
@@jakegold5495
In Jordan? hell they are second class citizens even in Palestinian authorities in the west bank. They are second class even among their own people.
@Ali
But all that I said is futile because, in the way you perceive the world, you do not belong to this world. You are some sort of a creature from outer space.
How can you come out with a delusional proclamation "illegal??? .... occupied?? according to which legal system??
They weren’t interested in building the state. They were interested in killing all their Jewish neighbors instead as they didn’t accept any land by the UN unless the Jews were killed as they say from then river to the sea. Islam can’t live side by side with Jews. But Jews accept Islam and give them full freedom to practice their Islam in Israel.
The Jews played their cards right
"With an official arab state nowhere in sight"
It grades the arabs, not the jews....
Quite inaccurate at times. On the one hand, how can you explain a 100-year old conflict in 5 mins, but on the other, how can there be so much inaccuracy in just 5 mins? Jordan wasn't gifted the West Bank, it invaded and occupied as a durect threat to the fledgling Jewish state. Ben Gurion announced the Stae of Israel on 14 May 1948, the local Arabs promptly attacked on 15 May and in nearly all cases got driven back despite superior manpower and weaponry. The list goes on.
A whole lot longer than 100 year old conflict
Look up Plan Dalet which started April 5th with the objective to depopulate the land of it's natives and you will find out that Israel stole much more land than they intended to depopulate the land of the natives.
@@callummcmac4079 This is the West Bank to which you're referring, I was talking about Israel. But yes Israel is land-grabbing in the West Bank; part of the difficulty is that Jews have lived there continuously for 4000 years, contrary to the common narrative. Don't take me for an Israeli though. I am profoundly concerned at how they are managing this situation.
the Wikipedia page is even worse
it was
Wow, no way was this video unfair to Israel and completely in accurate. I've studied history for 22 years and while you were accurate on alot, you left out a whole lot more.
how is the video unfair? what is the real history?
Israel history I presume
stfu cry about it israel doesn't exist
they know, this is uploaded by TRT World, It's on purpose
@@AQWOMAR9 for example they explain about israelis massacre arab but never explain when arab massacring the jews
One of friend who is an Arab-American muslim from mixed Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry once distributed food packets and medicines across Brooklyn including in the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighbourhoods
Just saying, we are all good
I'm chilean, and the arabs are an important part of our culture heritage. People may make offensive jokes, but when the discussion becomes serious everyone agrees that the arabs are mostly good people.
Proof?
Yes, because there’s loys of yehudia who are old, religious ans support palestine
If Israel lowers its guns their is no Israel
The Palestinians and Hamas want to kill us all. That's why no peace is happening
@@korosuke1788 im Chilean as well and don't understand any of this. did Arabs get here? where are arabs even from? Arabia?
To young people watching this, there are no Palestinians yet prior to 1948. Only Jews, Arabs, Bedouins, Armenians, Turks, Greeks, etc peopling the land. And it was the Ottomans who held all present day Israel before the end of WW1.
The editors of TRT might still reminiscing the glory of Istanbul.
and prior to the ottomans? why did the fall of the ottoman empire "create" so many different cultures?
@@mikethespike056 the Ottoman was comprised of hundreds of tongues and peoples not even related to each other.
I’m looking for stories of Egyptians who were in the 1948 war. I doubt any veterans are still alive (but let me know if I’m wrong!), but their families and friends have stories and memories which should be shared.
Good luck. The youngest would be around age 95 today.
TRT have got no shame? The photo at 01:23 is a real and known photo taken from the liberation day of Nordhausen Nazi concentration camp!
Fix the video this is shameful.
So biased it makes me wanna puke
man actaully this story is 100% real you can even find it on wikipedia
Well, I've heard nonsense before but this takes the cake
Thomas Dragt huh
Well if you want actual fact, this channel are a no-no. If you want some biased pro-islam false conclusion of information, here is many, good for laughing.
Neutral media= DW, BBC, VICE
Biased Pro muslim media= TRT, JAZEERA.
Sorry but it just the truth.
@@idono5935 I would say vice is decent...but u have got to be kidding me with DW and BBC......
@@mantosh56 yeah i start to realize lately that bbc kinda bias against right wing party but mostly they are neutral. Although, for me DW are the most neutral media i have ever found, their journalist are very good. My opinion though.
@@idono5935 Did check some of DWs content...seems allright ig though heard some critisism about them from some forums still from what i could see DWs not bad....But BBC...ugh
The way the reporter pronounce the name Iraq and Gaza give away the biased approach of this video which full with gaps concealing Arabs responsibility for their situation. Great job real reporter work!
This video is simply disrespecting people's intelligence !!
The internet is full of videos that explain the conflict in a neutral way with the aim of educating!
This channel thinks he's the only one who knows the truth!
It's the turks man of course it's bias, but then again under the table they are best buddies
God says in Exodus 20:15:
"Thou shall not steal".
Yaqub (Zionist settler) says in 2021:
"If I don't steal your house, someone else will steal it".
TRT has got no shame... The photo in 01:23 is a real and known photo taken from the liberation day of Nordhausen Nazi concentration camp!
@Clevera 1008 Turks and arabs are two VERY, VERY different things. If you'd like to educate yourself more I'd like to point to krauts 3 part, 4 hour (in total) documentary series on the history of the turks. Its very interesting, like, legit way more than I thought it would be
@Clevera 1008 That is exactly my point. This is a turkish broadcast. She is not an arab. She is a turk. Turks live in turkey, arabs live in arabia.
To put it into context - the Arab States did not attack Israel to "protect Palestine". There's no honor among theives. They wanted the territory for themselves. Jordan occupied the wb and had 50% parliamentary representation from it. Egypt maintained brutal control over Gaza. At the Lausanne Conference they proposed to divide the Negev in order to "maintain Arab continuity". The had 19 years from 1947 to 1968 to create a "Palestinian State" but did absolutely nothing. The claim is an utter sham.
I don't see how you can say that the Palestinians are "thieves". If anything, the Zionists were thieves.
thats unfortunately true especially with egypt too
They were all Colonial Puppets and jackals. Some of them had previously sold lands to the Zionists under the mandate.
עם ישראל חי ✌
עם ישראל חי
Sorry I can't understand terrorism
@@l9279 He wasn't speaking Arabic.
@@__parsa__ كول اي ري
So the Arab nations started a war. They could not win. The Jews won. Ok remind us what is the problem here? The bully loses and then complains they are oppressed. The events you call massacres happend as part of combat which the Arab states started. Please go back to high school and learn something.
Israel started a war by attacking egypt
Most of jews in palestine are from poland, they are not from the land, its not about the religion, its about who live there, and its arabs who lived there, arab jews, muslims and christians, Not european migrants that people say they are "jews" it doenst natter if they are jews or not, they dont have the right to take over the land
@@Cupid_AJ so if only the Jews already there established the state of Israel without Jews from Poland you will accept it? Since Israel was created by UN if UN said only Jews already there, would you accept or you will still attack it?
@@Cupid_AJ most Jews from Poland live in Poland and USA
Most Jews from Arab world lives in Israel
israel started by occupying palestine
There is a “Palestinian” state it’s called Jordan. The Arabs gambled in 1948 and lost now you must deal with the consequences, only when you love your children more than you hate the Jews will there be peace.
This is the greatest comment I have ever seen.
there were also European states were the European Zionists came from. They are such as Poland, Latvia, France, Germany
First of all, you're quoting Golda, who believed in a superior race and spoke openly abt extermination?! Also, it's surprising you're writing this bc it's not brought up as a point anymore: nobody who reads brings up the "war" b/c that's been refuted. Look up what really happened in 1948. This alone should show you the Arabs in the area, if really wanted to fight, would've stepped in 1946-47, when word of the first mass acres and expulsions were happening. At that time 200,000 Pales tinians were expelled. Read abt it from different sources. In 1948, there was no "war" of combatants vs. combatants, and no historian now denies this. What really happened is the "Arabs" (what is that exactly? Sudanese speak Arabic and they are "black") weren't interested in fighting, ill-prepared (every history book, no matter the persuasion, says this, yes, fewer in combatants), and rearraging themselves after colonialism. They were simply responding to the massacres happening in the villages next door! Village by village, the Ha ganah and Irgun plundered and massacred it's inhabitants. Heck, even mainstream Isre aelis will point this out, and so do historians. So your comment is not only inaccurate, it shows you deny what's really happening. Torture in prisons, raids in refugee camps, massacres, like the Flour Massacre (again, every news organization covered this-now undeniable). Being on the right side of history takes bravery-you can be one of them!
TRT? Biased as always. Crap!
man actaully this story is 100% real you can even find it on wikipedia
@@abdelrahmangamingpopo9289 TRT is the Islamist Erdogan's mouthpiece. Wikipedia? No thank you.
“To protect Arab Palestine” LMFAOOOOOOOOOO sure
"one day the lies will be break under theier owen weight"
One would hope so. I for one am saddened and sorry for the unfairness and the continuing heartbreak.
With all this history talk it is still clear who drew first blood. Don't go playing with a monsters tail, it'll turn back and eat you up....
Ain't that the Truth💯
An invasion is caused by the invader, not by the victim. The Arabs didn't start any first blood.
Coming to someone else's home and snatching away their home, and in reaction you expect owners of that house to keep quiet
And who drew first blood?
Who drew first blood? Is it an aggressive act when the European Jew Zionist settlers expelled the indigenous Arab population? I presume ur ignoring that point. Would you see it as an act of war if I and my cohorts came and expelled you from your home land? The minute the Zonists started the plan, they drew first blood.
Any body got a REAL documentary for me to watch this one makes my ears bleed
Search: Israel Birth of a Nation
@Monkooze Tees dude calm down?
@@MarsianicBrand indeed that sounds completely neutral
x b because they were about to win, then the UN declared a seize fire. Then Israel imported a bunch of tanks and fire power (which the UN said not to do, but Israel completely ignored it). So Palestine would of won, but the UN basically let Israel win.
@Monkooze Tees Uh oh since when you jihadists care about kids?
Jordan wasn't given the West Bank as a token, there was a parliament including the West Bank and East Bank that voted to be part of Jordans land.
Jordan annexed the west bank
Yeah, that part of the video made ZERO sense... thanks for clarifying that obvious nonsense.
@david guez No but there was no a country named Palestine, it was an independent state with its own government during the British colonization. And after the 1948 the west bank was part of Jordan to not lose it against the Zionist militias
@@rro3924 It was a state but not a country? Lets refresh our definition of country.
Country- a nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory.
Palestine was definitely a country.
@@deficrypto1234 Palestine never had a government before 1948, it was a territory under occupation by different foreign empires
A lot of things left unsaid by this video, particularly the fact that there was no mention of the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees expelled by the Arab nations upon the creation of Israel.
It's a Turkish government propaganda
Why were they expelled?
I literally forgot that the Jews and the Arabs used to live together in one country 😭
Like can y’all imagine Saudi Arabia still having its Jews
@@Thepotato-mo1jh Jews lived peacefully in many predominantly Muslim countries, for the most part as equal citizens. The trouble began with the Zionist takeover of Palestine.
By 1948, arab and jewish tension had reached an unprecedented level, with the arab nations proclaiming themselves as muslim nations, and the jews living in those arab nations never feeling like they were a part of the population, they fled. Arab governments didn’t really help with appeasing their fears, and instead agreed with the expulsion of their own jewish people into Israel.
May God protect and free Israel from tyrannical Islam 🙏✝️ 🇺🇲
Ur shame on christianity
Wait till you see that Arab christians refer to God as Allah
God bless the world 🌍 from tyranical American Whites.
The cross of bloodshed
You have no idea how much i appreciate this UA-cam channel. Thank you for many videos informing viewers (specifically Americans) about what goes on, and what has happened around the world. Thank You. I hope to go to Turkey one day :)
If this particular video is in any way representative for the channel then you probably should look elsewhere for your information.
The narrative that they present is so stupid.
They tell the story of how multiple Arab states attack and tried to destroy Israel and then blame Israel for the fact that there is no "Palestinian " state.
Can't you see how utterly ridiculous that is?
So to protect palestine, all the Arab's came together and attacked a small country together like a bunch of cowards. that sounds about right.
"small country".... lets rephrase it. "So to protect palestine, all the Arab countries still recovering came together and attacked a country supplied by the west with additional leftover equipment from the british. that sounds about right."
See how its disengenuous?
@@S0me0ne353 so the two faced countries got together and attacked a small country without thinking about the consequences? That sounds similar to the current situation. The innocent Palestinian should’ve and should be begging the Egyptian government to give them a refugee status until the IDF takes out the filthy trash that are currently hiding behind children and women.
Before ww2 the British government were the owners of this land and once they left they created two states thinking the Muslim and the Jews would live peacefully. Unfortunately that was a worthless dream. The Israeli government were also trying for the two states but the two faced people wanted everything for themselves. The two faced people have so much land in that area. Why can’t they just give the Jews that land and let them live in peace.
@@S0me0ne353 I think you’re misinformed sir.
@@S0me0ne353 the Arabs didn’t want a Jewish state. Jews after their holocaust wanted a place where they could live and protect themselves from the next nazi’s. Funny how the Quran talks about Israel and their land around 40 times and Palestine 0. It’s their land which is backed by the Quran.
Palestinians were not driven out they were promised by the cowering Arab nations to eliminate the Jewish state out of existence. God was on the side of the truth and we know who won that war. I salute the Israelis who defended their country and protected their people.
Let’s not forget that Jordan was 2/3 of British mandate of Palestine. And is 80% Palestinian arab and ZERO Jews.
The opposite is the accurate one
Your muslim taqiya not allowed here partner
Take the L and move on weakling
"Avi Shlaim says...Avi Shalim says...Avi Shlaim says..." - so what if he says??...many people say a lot of 'things'...so what?..if they say those things does it mean that the truth is out?!?..haha not at all...
And 1 example that pops up right now is how Arafat, during the Oslo accords, committed to that "the PLO renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence and will assume responsibility over all PLO elements and personnel in order to assure their compliance, prevent violations and discipline violators" but, at the very same day of the Oslo accords signing (13 September 1993), on Jordanian TV, he notified everyone that the Oslo accords is nothing more than a part of the 'PLO's Ten Point Program' (see Wikipedia). In other instances Arafat compared the Oslo accords with the 'Treaty of Hudaybiyyah' (Johannesburg 1994 and Cairo 1995) and in Stockholm 1996 he said "we are planning to eliminate Israel completely".
Wait, but this is completely the opposite to his Oslo accord commitment of "renouncing the use of terrorism and other acts of violence". So many people say a lot of 'things'...
For the rest, regarding this completely twisted video, one needs to search it very carefully in order to be able to 'fish out' the very few truthful things that are said in it!...
turkish based channel
I love Israel
In the book of Hosea 6th chapter and verse 1-2 it says " I will restore Israel" in 2 days = 2k years and it happened 1948.
Underrated comment
But now it won't. Israel about to get blown up by Islamic culture
Is that "2000" years with or without the 900+ some odd years that got jumped in the last "2,000" years? 🤔 Pretty convenient if you ask me. Almost like rewriting reality to fit the prophecy like we're seeing today.
Pallywood...
he bodies in 1:24 is not from Dier Yassin, it is a picture of Jews from the Holocaust. What can you expect from a 'news' owned by the government of TURKEY?
Jewliwood
henrikhansen facts they fake everything
Jewunited syate
Dir Yassin was not a massacre, but an Urban battle with the Irgun and Lehi on one side, and Iraqi soldiers and Arab irregulars on the other. It was mythologized as "a massacre" both by the Arabs, and by Ben Gurion's government who wanted to discredit the Irgun and Lehi.
I suppose u were there and in a better position to decide it wasn't a massacre compared to eye witnesses? What evidence do u have that it wasn't a massacre?
Wrong
I’m Palestinian
@@adhamabuirtaimeh7410 ok and that gives you more credit? That makes you just as biased and not neutral as an israeli. Then again, I am an israeli so I guess I just killed my own point
@@mooshiros7053 just go to palestine and i dare you to stay there for atleast 4 days, don't forgot to buy some diapers cause you gonna need it
The Palestinian Arabs rejected the partition plan that would have given them 42% of the territory. There will never be a better offer.
I took your house...but you can have the two bedrooms if you like ..deal ?
@@k.k8791Cry about it😂
@gpl992 i won't its not my house if it was mine i would fight back... wouldn't you ?
@@k.k8791 There are two sides to the conflict. The Jews were determined to claim a place where they could feel secure, and they opted for part of their ancestral homeland on offer via the Balfour Declaration. The Arabs west of the Jordan River were freaked out by the large numbers of Jewish immigrants turning up. Two understandable positions. If you insist on one side being right and the other being wrong, plenty of narratives are available for each side.
But if you want to actually understand the situation you need to read both sides. Try to avoid those accounts loaded with hyperbole. Those are geared to inflame passion rather than provide insight.
@cristop5 I'm an arab and i was with the Israeli side for years but when i started looking at history from an unbiased view i knew it's just a new colonial movement...it's a weak excuse to say my grandfather 3000 yrs ago lived here it's actually a cery stupid one cause that means the red indians should take theirand back from the Americans and the Persian take most of the middle east... and the other reason that made me switch sides is how Israel came to be ..they imported a massive numbers of extremists that started committing unspeakable Massacres and crimes and tantura is one of them ..they started burning villages and killing people from day one .. ane this is all admitted by veteran Israeli soldiers and they're proud of these crimes
Almost a month prior to the establishment of the State of Israel, wealthy palestinians started sending their relatives out of the country in anticipation of the Arabs attack. Additional people fled when the fighting started without ever seeing an Israeli soldier After the war, Arabs that remained were offered citizenship in Israel. Some became citizens, others stayed without becoming citizens. The Arab countries then deported over a million Jews living in their country to Israel.
No the Israeli’s massacred tens of thousands. I know people who lived through it. Get your knowledge up youngster
@@arjenrobbed1294an you better address the source of information?
@@jesslazz1061one of the famous massacre is also mentioned in this video. If you want list? Then just search the terms, Israeli massacre of Arabs
Who cares about this anecdote. The vast majority were not these wealthy people you speak of. The Jews ethnically cleansed Palestine. Either deny that fact or dont say anything.
@@LeelaSlayys arabs are still living in israel today and they are citizes of israel. Whats your point?
YOU SHOWED HELICOPTERS GIVEN TO ISRAEL IN 1948?????? You have got to be kidding me. This shows a complete lack of a basic understanding of both this conflict and history at large.
RIP
To the 6,373 Israeli soldiers and civilians, 3,700-7,000 Arab soldiers, and 3,000-13,000 Palestinian Arab fighters and civilians who were killed in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War
Checkmate from Czechoslovakia 💪🏼
The Czechs have a way with things that go bang,
@@Qingeaton hey...if Czechs helped Israel in 1948 then why did they supplied arms to Arabs in 1967 six day way....in 6 day war Israel got ammunitions from French n US. any idea?
@@saikiraraju.m.r Communism is what my idea is.
The French and Americans are good at arms as well.
@@saikiraraju.m.r The arms that the Czechs supplied Israel with were old Nazi surplus.
The Israeli Air Force was flying Czech copies of the ME-109.
@@saikiraraju.m.r Yes, after Communism emerged in Czechoslovakia, its international relations and bonds changed a lot.
Arabs back stabbed Palestinians this is what we all know....lack of strategy and lack of coordination is what made them to surrender....sigh
I mean couldn’t they give a part of Germany to the Jews
They gave a piece of their frauleins to the Muslims, that's for sure.
We still conquered 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🕎✡🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇬🇭🇬🇭🇬🇭🙏🏼
Sarah Ben lulu Hey Sarah count how much is this in my hand 🖕
Egypt and Jordan had the territory to establish a "Palestinian" state but never thought about it. Egypt controlled Gaza with military rule. Jordan kept the palestine Arabs in camps- as did the other Arab countries. 700,000 Palestine refugees fred Israel, but 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries and absorbed in Israel. Over 2 million Jews were absorbed by the tiny, brandnew state with 600,000 residents to begin with. Now, 75 years later- where are the Jews from Arab lands? They have homes and jobs. Are in all professions and influence Israel's politics. The Palestine refugees have been kept for three generations. The Nakba is NOT ON ISRAEL. IT IS ON THE ARAB STATES. shame on all of you.
The nakba means catastrophe... And by that they meant that Jews were not annhilated... The 700000 Palestinians fled and had nowhere to return to because Israel won and didn't want to live with people who wanted to kill them... So you are right... The arbs are at fault here and so are the Palestinians... They are crying after losing the war they started
@@gal_targareayn6721exactly correct.
@@goovialisticprofunks No, it's not. Read my reply and refute it-you can't b/c nobody who reads mentions it!
To the people who support israel,
Are you even human beings ?
Never go full hullabula......The whole of Palestine is Israel's, learn to live with it
People/Countries away ally with the Person/Country which have Power and here Israel is the most powerful country so all Countries including China, Russia, Japan, India and EU will support Israel...
Palestine is nothing but a imagination!
Every super power comes to end someday just wait for your
If you a human, what you have to say about killing of minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and other Islamic countries.
Yes, who declared war first? Ill answer for you the Arabs. If the arabs would stop attacking Israel then there would be no conflict.
When even the british can't contains the violence of arab and jews, i imagine the Arabs side as Hamas cruel extremist and Jew side as Racist IDF extremist.
Both are the same
Pallywood
100%
Palestine was a small strip of land that ran along the south western coast of ISRAEL!
This war shouldn't never happen. The Arabs were better by accept the UN 2 states solutions and help Palestinian to build a new Palestine state. 🇵🇸. All nations wanted to see Jews and Palestinian living side by side in their own lands peaceful
Consistent with this being a Turkish-run channel, it was of course one sided. Nothing is mentioned of the Palestinian Arabs rejecting the two-state solution that was offered them. No context given to the Dir Yassin massacre (within the larger Operation Nachshon), no mention of the same number of Jews being driven out of Arab countries. One sided Muslim drivel. Read Benny Morris' "1948" for a fair and two-sided account.
Kudos to trt for making this excellent propaganda 😆😆
😂😂😂
The voice behind this video has excellent arabic pronounciation
We'll probably because she's Arab...
It matches pretty well also with how biased that video was, probably a palestinian who has history in this place...
That's because she's an Arab propagandist.
Worth pointing out that in the UN partitioning about half of the land granted to Israel was the Negev desert which is basically inhabitable. The Arabs should have taken the deal. In addition, no guarantee the Arabs would have created a new state. More than likely they would have fought amongst themselves on how to carve it up.
Had arabs accepted the initial offer, there would be no problem, 2 states living in peace.
@Mohamed Saleh If the government says half my house actually belongs to someone else, then not not so sure
Elad Miller
Tell that to Count Bernadotte
@@ferrugoog is he the 1 that told Himler his attitude to jews is same?
No.the Arabs would still start a war greedy muslims
Very inaccurate. There were plans to settle long before the fictious 2-state. It was all a ploy for the cameras. Look up what the Mad Professor says about this. As a matter of fact, the initial plan was 55% of the land and a UN designated capitol. Did this happen? No, b/c they wanted to be an explicit majority, so underground groups, including the I rgun, engaged in tactics to expel, including mas sacres. Look up videos of soldiers discussing this-they don't hide it. So, why are you commenting? Why don't you read from different sources, compare notes, see videos, then post?
Long live Israel. From India.
@ahmadhijaz9194 not bot dear, Indians love Israel. Now, watching Fauda. It's good.
@ahmadhijaz9194 yes Israel hamaara dost tha hai aur rahega
Said the 💩 eater tanajur 😂
Israel dos not love India 🤣
@@ayushpatel1245 😂😂😂 Israeli murti pujne wala ko marna chahte hai jinda thoda history padh likh ke Aaaa andbakt😂😂😂
🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
I will never understand why the Arabs did not agree to peaceful and prosperous Israeli rule. They chose conflict. They chose hell. They chose Gaza. Why?
why?? this *hadith is the source of all this hatred & conflict in that region:
Allah's Messenger (Mohammed) said:
"The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them all until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews". (Sahih Muslim 2292)
*hadith is collection of traditions containing sayings of the profet Mohammed
If they chose peace with Israel they would prosper sooo much. But nah Muslims are not Clever
They had upper hand unlike now so they didn't want peace
@@zackdeew9757 I no longer think this is about religion. I now think that Hamas is a criminal group whose primary wish is to r*pe children. I think Hamas is a p*dophile organisation. Those tunnels were constructed so that perverts could snatch Israeli children and take them down there. We KNOW that Hamas pervs grabbed children.
The lesson is to Stop Attacking Israel . Reject the three No ‘s of Khartoum and replace them with ‘Yes’ to Recognition, Peace and Negotiation with Israel .
After 76 yrs of attacking Israel the Palestinians must by now understand that violence gets them nowhere , Egypt and Jordan have signed peace treaties with Israel , the Palestinians should follow suit
Why doesn't TRT talk about the Armenian genocide, committed in the same time period?
Oh I forgot, mentioning the genocide in Turkey is a capital offence..
2:00 best joke ever 😂😂😂😂😂
Yep, the last thing they want is a Palestinian government
this video covers so many important events and then seamlessly moves on to the next one making it seem like they're interrelated but it's much more complex than that and anybody looking for answers will only be confused by this video. If you want to know more take note of the important names and dates that she meant mentions in this video and go look them up independently each one has significance in their era but are less important today if ones goal is a peaceful end to this geopolitical tragedy. Fun fact the 1948 Arab Congress pledged to 'drive the Jews into the sea' and they also started what became the modern BDS movement at the same 1948 meeting.
It's a Turkish government propaganda
Definitely biased but still a somewhat decent coles notes version of events
Well, truth is in action and the invaders are constantly driving the natives into the sea. Exactly how many native villages and towns did Israel burn down/destroy? Every time Israel takes over a Palestinian street only Jews can walk on this street. Israelis are slowly driving the natives into the sea.
It was actually the Zionists who drove indigenous people into the sea, many of whose descendants now are forced to live in refugee camps. Here's a question: why are they still in refugee camps, by the millions, after 74 years? I'll wait . . . .
JEWISH NAKBA
800,000 Arab Jews forced to flee homes, business, money, properties, mistresses, the whole nine yards in supersonic speed (mind you) to avoid looming pogroms by affectionate, cuddly… albeit genocidal demented Arab mobs of demonic inclinations
The video fails to report the fact that both Israel and Arabs were asked to accept the partition, but only Israel did
😭😭😭 PALESTİNE 😭😭😭 FROM TURKEY
Who do you think would have won in a war between the twelve Israelite tribes and the Arabian tribes of ancient times?
At that time, the Arabian tribes were not strong enough to challenge the Israelite tribes.
Depends how ancient. Arabs because they were more in number
This is like asking, who would have won in a fight, King Neptune or Bat Man?
@varalderfreyr8438 so god let old Germany kill millions of civilians in WW2? (im saying old in case youtube deletes that word)
@@apparidown :D
To those who do not support Israel. Are not capable of rational thought?
beet74
Compared to arabs/ muslims, of course.
Are any Egyptian veterans from 1948 still alive? I’m looking for stories from them or memories from families.
I want to too
My grandpa fought in both wars as a Navy General. Unfortunately he passed away long before I was born, so my knowledge on his story is very limited, beyond the fact that he fought in both wars, and in his second tour (in the 70s), his ship was targetted by some sort of missile which took him and his crew members out of the battle. I’m guessing that would have been the Battle of Baltim, but I don’t know for sure. He survived, but was on a cane for what remained of his life. Wish I knew more than that.
I am yes, it was a horrible war
@@thewhorenextdoor8268 I’m sure many people would like to hear your story
They may be alive but they're ashamed to tell their fate by the Israeli
Very biased video. Yes, the Arabs did reject the partition then cry when they claim they are being kept from a Palestinian state. They've been offered a state time and time again. Most of the Jewish settlements were purchased legally at high prices from Arab land owners. The Jews then worked the land. They worked it hard and improved it. So what Palestinians owned what lands?
Secondly, who are the Palestinians? Most are refugees resettled there in the past few decades prior to 1948 in order to have Arabs on the land. Many were hired labor from Syria, Iraq, and other countries, moved there to work on land owned by absentee Arab landlords, many of who sold their land to Jewish settlements. There just were very few national Palestinians except Bedouins who, by the way, sided with the Jews and became Israeli citizens after 1948, if you check your history.
Finally, what about the Palestinian refugees? Has the surrounding Arab countries done much to help? Most were kept in camps and made second class residents, often not allowed out of those camps. Most of those camps still exist today.
The Palestinians have never been offered a 'State'. A state involves control of your own borders, resources with your own independent fighting force and opportunities to participate in international agencies and trade agreements.. I challenge anyone to present when that was ever offered to any Palestinian representative. Any evidence?
@@deficrypto1234 Now a state, has its own borders, and fighting force, what happened to your argument that Palestine was a state??
What do you know?! You crusading white orange 🍊 president.
Very much one-sided report, i must say.
One must remember that beginning at March 1947 (from Cairo) throughout the entire 1948 war, Jews whose families lived in the Arabs states of the ME for Millenia had their bank accounts confiscated, property vandalized and eventually deported with one briefcase. There were 811,000 such ppl, just in the 1948 war. the deportations continued after the war, last was from Libya in 1972. Overall around 1.2M Jews were deported.
Off course that's a real tragedy. But it baffles me when people use that as a response to Palestinian displacement. What is the connection?
And is their suffering your excuse to justify the nearly 100 years old on going genocide of the Palestinians?
@@_.belladonna_ "Genocide" is a curious word to describe a process where a group of people who are actually descendants of Jews who converted to Islam, multiply 40 fold. And yes, it did not start in 1948. The war actually started in 1920 with the Mufti declaration of a Jihad against the Jews. That was well before the Arabs have decided that the "Arab Palestinians" are a nation (who cannot even pronounce its name properly, they say "filistin").
@@_.belladonna_ Just to be clear on that - the "Arab Palestinian nation" was invented in Jan. 1964 in the first Arab summit in Cairo. Prior to that, there were no "Arab Palestinians" as the word "Palestinian" was a derogatory pronoun describing a Jew from the holy land - and it's been that way ever since Hadrian.
@@_.belladonna_ "Palestine" is a word invented by Hadrian. Arabs cannot even pronounce it right.
May the Palestinians find justice and peace.
Yes, may the Palestinians find justice and peace.
.. Far away from the Jewish homeland!
@@Tamir-Barkahan That has been your goal for 70 years, but many of them are still in your country aren't they?
@@Interests97 Unfortunately. But we're working to change that, don't worry.
@@Tamir-BarkahanCome talk to me when you have finished your colonial project.
@@Interests97 Sure thing!
The consequences of failing at a genocide
Whoever was first to create a government would have it.
One day hopefully a peaceful Palestinian state can coexist with Israel.
Peace can never be when you have an aparheid state system, if you want peace you should start by giving people the same right, Zionist when created Israel by stealing Palestiniens land don't want Palestiniens on this land let alone give them the same rights as jewsh..
That was what one could call a tilted shortstory. Mai oh mai
Turkey where are your jews? What do you did to Armenians???
Bob Rock we did nothing to them . i had armenian friends in turkey
This was about the power of being on code and the weakness of being off code. It was about the power of unity versus the weakness of disunity.
It's about people trying to feel better than each other. If everyone was truly CHRIST like... they would LOVE EVERYONE. ❤ but yet... they kill in the NAME OF RELIGION
Palestine ✨️✨️ We love You
India 🌼
Israel is essential for the world
Aggressors in war who loses are supposed to concede territories to the victors. Just ask Germany and Japan how WWII worked out for them. Germany in particular lost so much land it was ridiculous.
The aggressors are the Zionists liars who stole lands
Exactly. But the loser still feel bitter till today lmao.
I believe there is one god and he will return the right for Palestinian this is what happened before and will happen again inshallah
🇵🇸✌🏻
Saleh Alammari92 Allah is a false god. The only living God is Elohim of Israel.
What is Allah waiting for?
Saleh: When did it happen before? (Unless you're referring to the Return of the Jewish diaspora)
First, let's deal with this. The UN Adopted UN Res. 181, the Arabs overwhelmingly rejected this plan, so no division of the land was agreed to; it was rejected by all the Arabs. Thus, to act like this has any bearing on how the land is set up now is silly. To have an agreement, both parties have to agree, or the agreement is null and void.
And atrocities? Ah, you mean the Arabs attacked the Jews? Then, after seeing the British refused to protect them, they set up self-defense gangs who attacked back when attacked.
Let's deal with the second point of misinformation here. Arabs were led not by Arabs; they were led by British officers who did not want an independent Israeli nation; I suggest you Google a Lt. Gen. Glubb.
Regarding the UN cease-fire, the UN demanded all sides, not arm, the British were arming the Arabs during the cease-fire, to act like Israel was the only party that was doing this is nonsense.
And Jordan was never gifted the West Bank; they occupied and tried to annex it, that was Israeli land. Amazing how this was left out too.
Well explained, thanks
Your saying there were no Jewish Militant groups before 1948?
Israel best 🇮🇱
Hhhhhhhhhh best ?
Palestine will be free.
Before the war: "We will not give the Jews any land. We reject this two-state partition and we want all of the land. Drive out all the Jews! "
After the war: " Please respect the two-state partition and don't encroach into our land. Please don't drive us out of Palestine 👉👈🥺"
Based
Ok, this video is not that misleading as I expected it to be. Though it still has some "anti" somebody (it doesn't really mean, against whom the Arabs or Israelis, however, it has a stance against Israel.), it still presents a lot of valuable information, at least much more valuable than I expected.
But let's go through the points that are probably wrong, at least to my knowledge:
1) The west bank and eastern Jerusalem, were not given to Jordan as a "gift" (when did you see that in the world's history? It is not the way the politics work.), instead we have to mention the fact, that Palestine was under Jordanian rule during the British mandate, in fact, the name of Jordan, at first was - Transjordan, as it was a bridge upon the "Jordan River".
2) They didn't mention the interests of the Arab states in the war. They mentioned Egypt and I guess Jordan, but that's all. So, Egyptian policy was to create a United Arab State (which they actually, created in 1961 with Syria, although Syria withdrew it in 1962, after a military coup took place, however, still Egypt's name was "The United Arab Republic", if I'm not wrong, up until 1971.).
Next, Syrian point, was that in the past, during the Ottoman rule, the territories of the Lebanese mountains, Palestine-Israel region and what we know today as "Jordan", were all part of Syrian eyalet in Ottoman Empire, so the Syrians always wanted to dominate all of these regions, as in 1977 (during a coup attempt in Jordan*. Supported by the U.S*), Syrians moved their forces to Jordan in an attempt to probably establish their dominance. Or as they entered Lebanese Civil War and kept troops in Lebanon up until 2005. So, they saw Palestine as a Historical Syrian land as well.
3) By the way, Jordanians always had an understanding with the Israelis, as they had some problems with the Palestinians.
It’s so difficult to get an unbiased view on this, especially with someone like myself who’s an outsider looking in, trying to get an understanding on the subject. Don’t know where to properly get info and it seems like a tug of war
@@Flatbush21rst Well I wouldn't rely on this 5-min vid Flatbush, it's full of anti-Israeli bias and inaccuracies - eg "the Arab League was established to establish a homeland for the Palestinians" - wrong, it was established to wipe out the Jews - but that's not me saying that, the AL leaders of the day stated it themselves, it's in the written historic record
@@jnturner506 wow, thank you for the clarity. I guess I would have to look more in-depth, even with what’s presented in front of me. Appreciate the heads up
@@Flatbush21rst same. it's almost impossible.
The fact of the matter is - Israel is not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better on democracy, technology, human rights and statehood than all its neighbours.
It might be better on technology ,but Israel should not even have the right to talk about human rights. It is not a single bit better than its neighbours. Forcing native people out of their homes and killing them? then wondering why they are fighting back. The history of Palestine is a tragic one it did not start 2 months ago. Hamas might be a terror organization but Israel and the west craeted these monsters .
These people want their revenge they want their homes back.
If the west never denied its jewish brother's and sisters if they would have lived peacefully together their would have never been a reason to create a home for european jewish people in a land that is already home to Palestinians in the middle east.
@@ifrahismael781 that’s a bit disingenuous ottoman leader sold the land to Israel, so you know that’s like saying if I buy a house there’s a squatter in it I have no right to kick him out cuz he was there 1st.
2nd- Arabs liberation army was lead by Fawzi al-Qawuqji who served with the ss, so that’s kinda iffy aswell.
@@James-9999 well ottoman leaders had no right to sell a country and Israel had no right to buy it.
This is just crazy!
@ifrahismael781 Without Brits Palestine would be still part of Turkey today
when enemies and foes will rise up against Israel, they shall stumble and fall.. lol
@E .S are you ignorant assuming all black people are one? all sharing the same ethnicity, history, language, culture, future?
@E .S " A black man who's ancestors have been enslaved", how do you know what is his origin and if his ancestors were enslaved?
Humans started the war, but God finished it!!🙏💜
Evil people must be stop
AND WHAT DID TURKEY DO :
Israel-Turkey relations were formalized in March 1949, when Turkey was the first Muslim majority country to recognize the State of Israel