Damn, that's beautiful. I have this kit, had it for many years and waited too long. Eyes no good, hands don't work like they used to. I'm glad to see someone really put their time and heart into this sweet kit. BRAVO !
Thank you that is very kind of you ! I am very happy about your comment ! What do you think of the enterprise bridge model kit I built ? ua-cam.com/video/3HaEvmJHaEs/v-deo.html
Looks great. Wow. Used to be, if we had a few 3 volt wheat bulbs and a stand that didn't fall over. Now look where scale modeling has gone. Sweet. May I suggest: Shuttlecraft Set - Part 1 ua-cam.com/video/jwfq2T8ubW8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=AdamSavage%E2%80%99sTested and ua-cam.com/video/Gs_pWND6pko/v-deo.html&ab_channel=LouDalmaso
Pretty good, my only real point of critique being the bussard hemispheres on the front of the warp nacelles. The "ribs" need to be on the inside, not the outside, and they need to be thinner, and uniform all along their length. Otherwise, nice job!
Hello, a great video and build! I've just had a look in my box and while the lid says "1:650", I'm rather certain it's in "1:537" scale compared with the "Refit" model kit (and the "Reliant"). Their saucer sections match up whereas my other 1:650 scale enterprise is a lot smaller in comparison.
Outstanding. I loved the 70s blueprints and AMT models and built them all, but the nacelles wouldn't stay straight. Not designed for a gravity environment!
I loved the work, congratulations, I have that same model but I lost the bridge, now I want to do it on a 3d printer, could you tell me how big its diameter is? Thank you
@@Jungfrauenquelle , I know about them. I understand the one under discussion was 22" long. I find the 1960s AMT 18" kit too riddled with errors. So, I recently thought to consider a modification of the cutaway model. Sigh. What do you know of the Revell AG (Germany) kit of the Starship Enterprise (TOS)? Would you know the scales of these models, please? I include the 1980s AMT kit of the Starship Enterprise Refit/ Enterprise -A. I never can find straight answers. A little off topic: had you heard some fans had built a full-sized model of the Starship Enterprise (TOS) --yes, a 288 metre, 947-foot!-- replica. It may be a UA-camr boast. If it is true, you will have to do the rivet counting! My eyes would go on strike before I had reached my age (which I cannot remember)!
@@DavidRLentz Revell's model is not very detailed ! If you want a good model of the enterprise you can go with the kit from Polar Lights Star Trek TOS U.S.S. Enterprise w/Pilot 1:350 It is the best alternative ! Es gibt auch zubehör für dieses Modell ( Star Trek - 1/350 Maßstab Tos Enterprise Supplimental Fotoätzung Set - PGX165 ) Von dem Bau der Entrprise in 1-1 glaube ich das ist ein Fake ! Alein die kosten ....
Really fantastic job! Well done. Based on the internal details and how they compare in scale to an adult human, what would you say is the total length of the ship in "real" life?
While the TOS Enterprise is a timeless classic, the cutaway highlights some of the longstanding design issues, flaws with the original design. Notably, the thin transverse cross-section of the neck, which should have been thicker, or upscaled. Also, the concave profile of the saucer section underside, resulting in thinning down to one deck thick for no apparent reason other than overall aesthetic design exterior. Both issues have been fixed in the Kelvin Enterprises, somewhat in the Tos Tmp refit, and also the Snw Enterprise. Both Snw and Jjprise have thicker necks and flat, no concave saucer undersides
incorrect. What you in ignorance call "design flaws" are aspects of the original concept that set this ship apart from all that came before and redefined what a starship could be, for all who followed in Jeffries/Roddenberry's footseps. The curves of the saucer are part of its ability to navigate atmosphere after separation under extreme circumstances. basically as a lifeboat, since this class did not have escape pods. The neck and pylons are exactly the way they wanted them. Its a warpship not a rocket, and during maneuvers it makes use of attractor/pressor/stabilizer beams incorporated into the hull to stabilize it, negating the need to conform to outmoded steel-hull engineering dicta. Theres an aspect of "see what we can do" showing off of engineering prowess to that .. which is appropriate in a ship of the line designed to operate far afield, representing the advantages, power and prestige of the Federation to both prospective members and to prospective foes. She's a proud elegent beauty by design. and stands ready to embarass you any day you choose to challenge her. Revisionist nonsense has marred her beauty and pales by comparison. Theres a reason the most perfect version is sitting in the Smithsonian, where she belongs. Those others aren't and never will.
That is a beautiful work of art.
Damn, that's beautiful.
I have this kit, had it for many years and waited too long.
Eyes no good, hands don't work like they used to.
I'm glad to see someone really put their time and heart into this sweet kit.
BRAVO !
Thank you that is very kind of you ! I am very happy about your comment ! What do you think of the enterprise bridge model kit I built ? ua-cam.com/video/3HaEvmJHaEs/v-deo.html
@@Jungfrauenquelle I'll check it out this weekend.
Sat and Sun are my model binge days.
Looks great. Wow.
Used to be, if we had a few 3 volt wheat bulbs and a stand that didn't fall over.
Now look where scale modeling has gone. Sweet.
May I suggest:
Shuttlecraft Set - Part 1
ua-cam.com/video/jwfq2T8ubW8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=AdamSavage%E2%80%99sTested
and
ua-cam.com/video/Gs_pWND6pko/v-deo.html&ab_channel=LouDalmaso
Awesome work. Very detailed and impressive.
What a masterpiece - absolutely stunning! So well done. 👏👏👏👏👏
Pretty good, my only real point of critique being the bussard hemispheres on the front of the warp nacelles. The "ribs" need to be on the inside, not the outside, and they need to be thinner, and uniform all along their length.
Otherwise, nice job!
He also short changed the number. He only put 4 in when there should be 12.
Fascinating… I have this kit waiting to be built. You have raised the bar for my build. Great job!
Amazing build!
... I agree with everyone.... It's an amazing fantastic supurb impressive work of art
The best I have seen. Great detail painting!
I can see a lot of time and effort went into this. Well done sir!🖖
Very impressed.
Amazing work! But, how much??
Super cool build!
thal looks really good, well done
Hello Planet Pop! For the nacelle effects I simply used flickering LEDs .
I have this model sitting in my closet in its original box with the saran wrap. It’s been there for over 20 years but now I have an idea 😉
Would you tell me what kind of idea that is
Jolly good, Master Wayne🙂
That is seriously cool!! I have the same kit but mine isn't lit. But I am now inspired to do another kit and light it up!
stunning work!
very impressive
Damn that's awesome 👍 ❤️
WOW! ...I mean... I am in awe
There is a special cut away kit of the TOS USS Enterprise?
That looks fantastic!!
Well done!
Hello, a great video and build!
I've just had a look in my box and while the lid says "1:650", I'm rather certain it's in "1:537" scale compared with the "Refit" model kit (and the "Reliant"). Their saucer sections match up whereas my other 1:650 scale enterprise is a lot smaller in comparison.
Late to the party here, but truly stunning. 🙂
where did you get the paper insert, I think that looks Great and adds a new level
You can find them on google ! Search for Cutaway Enterprise pictures
Awesome! great work!😃
Nice!
Outstanding.
I loved the 70s blueprints and AMT models and built them all, but the nacelles wouldn't stay straight. Not designed for a gravity environment!
I loved the work, congratulations, I have that same model but I lost the bridge, now I want to do it on a 3d printer, could you tell me how big its diameter is?
Thank you
Go to 8:40. See the hand? It's on the smaller side of average size. Measure the hand and use that for a reference to judge the diameter of the bridge.
Carved up like a Thanksgiving Turkey!
Could one make a regular model of the Starship Enterprise with this kit?
Not with this kit! If you want a regular model then google them Star Trek Ncc 1701 Enterprise W/ Pilot Edition or Star Trek Ncc 1701 Enterprise kit
@@Jungfrauenquelle , I know about them. I understand the one under discussion was 22" long. I find the 1960s AMT 18" kit too riddled with errors. So, I recently thought to consider a modification of the cutaway model. Sigh.
What do you know of the Revell AG (Germany) kit of the Starship Enterprise (TOS)?
Would you know the scales of these models, please? I include the 1980s AMT kit of the Starship Enterprise Refit/ Enterprise -A. I never can find straight answers.
A little off topic: had you heard some fans had built a full-sized model of the Starship Enterprise (TOS) --yes, a 288 metre, 947-foot!-- replica. It may be a UA-camr boast.
If it is true, you will have to do the rivet counting! My eyes would go on strike before I had reached my age (which I cannot remember)!
@@DavidRLentz Revell's model is not very detailed ! If you want a good model of the enterprise you can go with the kit from Polar Lights Star Trek TOS U.S.S. Enterprise w/Pilot 1:350 It is the best alternative ! Es gibt auch zubehör für dieses Modell ( Star Trek - 1/350 Maßstab Tos Enterprise Supplimental Fotoätzung Set - PGX165 )
Von dem Bau der Entrprise in 1-1 glaube ich das ist ein Fake ! Alein die kosten ....
From the construction of the Enterprise in 1-1 I think that's a fake! Just the costs....
@@Jungfrauenquelle vielen dank! Fröliche Weihnachten!
Really fantastic job! Well done. Based on the internal details and how they compare in scale to an adult human, what would you say is the total length of the ship in "real" life?
startrek.de/universum/Raumschiffe/
👍🏼
Are you looking for Star Trek USS Enterprise NCC 1701 Cut Away Von AMT ERTL 8790
ah, cutaway. does it have the bowling alley?
Sure, of course 😉
2:24
I'm more interested in the music than the model.
🙄
Great job on such a terrible kit. I spent a good month on mine every night to get it to look good. No lighting though. That's above and beyond.
While the TOS Enterprise is a timeless classic, the cutaway highlights some of the longstanding design issues, flaws with the original design.
Notably, the thin transverse cross-section of the neck, which should have been thicker, or upscaled.
Also, the concave profile of the saucer section underside, resulting in thinning down to one deck thick for no apparent reason other than overall aesthetic design exterior.
Both issues have been fixed in the Kelvin Enterprises, somewhat in the Tos Tmp refit, and also the Snw Enterprise.
Both Snw and Jjprise have thicker necks and flat, no concave saucer undersides
incorrect. What you in ignorance call "design flaws" are aspects of the original concept that set this ship apart from all that came before and redefined what a starship could be, for all who followed in Jeffries/Roddenberry's footseps.
The curves of the saucer are part of its ability to navigate atmosphere after separation under extreme circumstances. basically as a lifeboat, since this class did not have escape pods.
The neck and pylons are exactly the way they wanted them. Its a warpship not a rocket, and during maneuvers it makes use of attractor/pressor/stabilizer beams incorporated into the hull to stabilize it, negating the need to conform to outmoded steel-hull engineering dicta.
Theres an aspect of "see what we can do" showing off of engineering prowess to that .. which is appropriate in a ship of the line designed to operate far afield, representing the advantages, power and prestige of the Federation to both prospective members and to prospective foes.
She's a proud elegent beauty by design. and stands ready to embarass you any day you choose to challenge her.
Revisionist nonsense has marred her beauty and pales by comparison. Theres a reason the most perfect version is sitting in the Smithsonian, where she belongs. Those others aren't and never will.