In reality your intake is doing no work at all when your intake is spinning. Since w=fd and f=ma that means that a=o which means w=0*md aka 0. The only time your intake actually does work is after it intakes a cube and has to reaccelerate. Aka when a is NOT equal to zero. The half wall doesn’t do anything to affect work. If you really want to decrease work, you have to decrease work on your bucket
I appreciate your comment, and it's something I've been eager to see for a while. If we can engage in brainstorming sessions with all the kids about principles like physics and math, everything will start to make more sense. Robotics is certainly about more than just competitions.
Wait what I just did the math for my robot and something isn’t right. If W=F*D and force is F=Mass*Acceleration, then that means that whenever the intake remains at a constant speed the force is 0 and 0 times the distance will always be 0. So your intake is doing 0 work? So then why does that half wall improve your intake? So if the key is keeping your intake at a constant speed, then maybe I should experiment with flywheel weights so it’s harder for the intake to loose its inertia?
your intake is actually doing 0 work because your force is equal to zero. this is because f=mass x acceleration and your acceleration here is 0 because your intake is spinning at a (mostly) constant speed.
yooo, we also had a vertical band wall in the early stages of the season, im assuming that you decided that wasnt a good design because of the bands’ vertical strain on the structure. we had this exact issue and just stuck with a horizontal wall instead. but all season basically we had what u called a half wall in the video but with rubber bands instead of beams like u had in the video. i could go more in depth but his comment is already long enough. maybe a phone # to text or discord if u have one?
edit: oh i realize your design now, ingenious in my opinion! one level gets full and now theres no space for more blocks. so they have no choice but to go up! awsome! (i didnt have what u had all season at all, mb)
In this video, we were trying 4:1 on 2-motor intake, actually, we spent 2 weeks exploring 4:1 2m intake, tried all the wall combinations that we could think of, and our conclusion is, don't use it, at least on our robot. On a good run, we saw 20s clear supply zone, on a bad run, it will be 40s. We heard 4:1 2m intake works amazingly on some team's robot, you can find them on UA-cam, but we could not handle it.
In reality your intake is doing no work at all when your intake is spinning. Since w=fd and f=ma that means that a=o which means w=0*md aka 0. The only time your intake actually does work is after it intakes a cube and has to reaccelerate. Aka when a is NOT equal to zero. The half wall doesn’t do anything to affect work. If you really want to decrease work, you have to decrease work on your bucket
I appreciate your comment, and it's something I've been eager to see for a while. If we can engage in brainstorming sessions with all the kids about principles like physics and math, everything will start to make more sense. Robotics is certainly about more than just competitions.
Your smart
@@Vexguy1 you're*
@@CaliforniaPizza95133E💀
@@CaliforniaPizza95133Ebro really just disrespected an armbot user in the most savage way
We had a bad experience trying that. We also found that a PET sheet rubberband wall hybrid worked best
This is an amazing design process and idea. I vote for auto winning of Design@Worlds.
there not going :(
@@madisoglrobotics I mean they should get the award anyway just for this video
Just tried gap wall on my robot but with rubber bands and plastic sheets works great!!!
bro y'all are mad scientists "this season we use a FORMULA."
The only Mad Scientist on the planet is Riley Markley😂
@@flyingcheese22608aso true though 😂
@@madisoglrobotics 🤓
@@flyingcheese22608a lol true
Wait what I just did the math for my robot and something isn’t right. If W=F*D and force is F=Mass*Acceleration, then that means that whenever the intake remains at a constant speed the force is 0 and 0 times the distance will always be 0. So your intake is doing 0 work? So then why does that half wall improve your intake? So if the key is keeping your intake at a constant speed, then maybe I should experiment with flywheel weights so it’s harder for the intake to loose its inertia?
your intake is actually doing 0 work because your force is equal to zero. this is because f=mass x acceleration and your acceleration here is 0 because your intake is spinning at a (mostly) constant speed.
Can you make a video about the pivot/chomping mechanism for the elevator?
Flying cheese are planning to use PTO?
Respect 🦾
Hey, what is y’all’s base gear ratio
Yooo 1:01 sus wall 🎉 thanks guys for trying it, sorry it couldn’t be much help for yall
Big help! We went to State with it.
@@flyingcheese22608aOh shoot I didn’t notice😅!
Good luck with the state championship, Isaiah.
@@flyingcheese22608a Thank you so much! We’re about to go
Congrats on the Excellence Award!
yooo, we also had a vertical band wall in the early stages of the season, im assuming that you decided that wasnt a good design because of the bands’ vertical strain on the structure. we had this exact issue and just stuck with a horizontal wall instead. but all season basically we had what u called a half wall in the video but with rubber bands instead of beams like u had in the video. i could go more in depth but his comment is already long enough. maybe a phone # to text or discord if u have one?
edit: oh i realize your design now, ingenious in my opinion! one level gets full and now theres no space for more blocks. so they have no choice but to go up! awsome! (i didnt have what u had all season at all, mb)
What’s the advantage of uniband walls?
We found it would help the green cubes stay organized in the lift, also, we saved 1 pitch in length with it.
@@flyingcheese22608awhat’s a pitch in length?
what gear ratio is the intake where you use the half wall
In this video, we were trying 4:1 on 2-motor intake, actually, we spent 2 weeks exploring 4:1 2m intake, tried all the wall combinations that we could think of, and our conclusion is, don't use it, at least on our robot. On a good run, we saw 20s clear supply zone, on a bad run, it will be 40s. We heard 4:1 2m intake works amazingly on some team's robot, you can find them on UA-cam, but we could not handle it.