AI Writing Software That Bypasses Ai Content Detectors (Mostly!)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • I test some AI writing software that can bypass most of the commonly used AI content detect software tools.
    👉 Get Blog Assistant AI Writer LTD Here: jasonwest.com/... ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
    👉 Undetectable software: jasonwest.com/...
    👉 Ultimate directory of AI Content detectors: ChatGPTDetecto...
    HOW I CAN HELP YOU
    ***********************
    ✅ - Join my Free Community: jasonwest.com/...
    🤖 - Claim your FREE AI-powered Chatbot: FastBots.ai
    💰- Start your own AI Chatbot Agency: FastBots.ai/ag...
    🔥 - Get the ultimate ChatGPT Course at: ChatGPTSkool.com
    🏷️ - Sell your stuff online with powerful funnels: FastFunnels.com
    CONNECT WITH ME
    ********************
    UA-cam: / jasonwestdigital
    Twitter: / jwestdigital
    LinkedIn: / jwestdigital
    Instagram: / jwestdigital
    USEFUL LINKS
    ******************
    Lifetime Deal Software: jasonwest.com/...
    Avoid AI detection: jasonwest.com/...
    Community platform: jasonwest.com/...
    Ai Detector Directory: chatgptdetecto...
    *Affiliate Disclaimer:
    Note this description may contain affiliate links that allow you to find the items mentioned in this video and support the channel at zero cost to you. Thank you for your support! 🙏🏻
    #chatgpt #aidetection #jasonwest

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @LaMontPrice
    @LaMontPrice Рік тому +6

    I just tested, again, about 5 documents in Winston and it (AI detection in general) definitely can't be used as a litmus test. I found old government documents in pdf form from 2012 and they were being flagged at 48% human generated.

  • @Conquered
    @Conquered Рік тому +3

    These AI detectors are a joke... I just gave Winston a story I wrote using 50% AI and 50% my own thoughts. It only marked two sentences as AI generated and one as possibly AI generated. The thing though is, the three sentences it marked were 100% my own thoughts and did not come from the AI at all... LMAO I kind of feel offended now

  • @dombarton2483
    @dombarton2483 Рік тому +8

    Easy to crack winston. You just need the correct prompt. I can achieve 90% and above. There is no detector on the planet that i cannot fool even google. All my content ranks for commercial intent keywords, most others can only achieve informational content success.

    • @ellocosjchushhxha
      @ellocosjchushhxha Рік тому

      👍!!!!!!!!👍!!!!!!!!👍
      EDIT: 🍆

    • @enjoyi123
      @enjoyi123 Рік тому +3

      What tool(s) do you use? And do you mind sharing one or two helpful tips for someone looking to achieve the same?

    • @dombarton2483
      @dombarton2483 Рік тому +1

      @@enjoyi123 no tool. Just my brain. Never ever. Its idiots like those on the tube that open their big mouths revealing so much, which just feeds google all they need to know.

    • @Qutekid
      @Qutekid Рік тому +2

      which tools do you use?

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому +7

      Yes, I'm sure there's a prompts that can disrupt the usual patterns contained within AI generated content enough so that the AI detectors struggle. If you wanted to share a prompt example, I'm sure they'll be an awful lot of people here who would be very happy to see it. Thanks for your comment.

  • @LaMontPrice
    @LaMontPrice Рік тому +2

    I just dropped an very old government amendment into Winston and it said it 71% human. For me, that's unreliable.

  • @thomassynths
    @thomassynths Рік тому +4

    The Winston tests I feel need a few control group tryouts using human articles

    • @SebastianKraus24
      @SebastianKraus24 Рік тому +1

      exactly what I thought 🤗

    • @darlamckinnon4546
      @darlamckinnon4546 Рік тому

      I'm blackpilled on Winston

    • @LaMontPrice
      @LaMontPrice Рік тому

      I just did that using documents written in 2012. Results never got higher than 51% human written. AI Detection is based on probability. It's not an exact science so at this point, I'm not very worried.

  • @codiannsmith
    @codiannsmith Рік тому +3

    Or we could edit the ai content and then it will naturally pass as a human wrote it, plus it will be 10x better!

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому +1

      I guess you could give that a try for me I'm just trying to create the content as quickly as possible without human intervention using AI, but that depends where the content being posted of course. If it's like my personal blog or something, I most definitely would be wanting to give it the once over before posting!

    • @essyisjustreacting
      @essyisjustreacting Рік тому

      I have a novel I wrote 5 years ago and it still didn't pass AI detection.

  • @mrlions420
    @mrlions420 Рік тому +1

    These videos are really interesting, I'd suggest running human written content through them first to see what they come back with

  • @droptimistic7419
    @droptimistic7419 Рік тому +2

    so are you saying GPT4 wont be detect? I get confused about the tool that you have mentioned and using GPT4? would you please elbrate on this point?

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому

      In the video, I tested using GP T4 to make an article and it did a good job of passing most AI detectors, but overall the best tool for Rapid SEO friendly blog posts that bypass most detectors is definitely blog assistant 👉 jasonwest.comblogassistant

    • @droptimistic7419
      @droptimistic7419 Рік тому

      @@JWestdigital thank you for your reply I appreciate it, I tested GPT4 but it didnt pass with Copyleak, 😔😔😔😔😔😔, so can you explain how to use this tool?

  • @haroldpierre1726
    @haroldpierre1726 Рік тому +3

    This is a great review. I've been using Claude 2 and found a few prompts to minimize detection.

    • @maninblack2875
      @maninblack2875 Рік тому

      What are these a few prompts please?

    • @haroldpierre1726
      @haroldpierre1726 Рік тому +2

      @@maninblack2875 Use perplexity and burstiness. That's one of the prompts. Search what AI detectors are looking for and you can use that information to improve your prompt.

    • @LaMontPrice
      @LaMontPrice Рік тому

      @@haroldpierre1726 Perplexity and burstiness prompts stopped working for me long ago.

  • @haroldpierre1726
    @haroldpierre1726 Рік тому +5

    Since this product uses GPT 4 integration, I suspect that they are using some very good prompts to generate, paraphrase, and humanize their output. I have to admit, anyone can do this with GPT 4 or Claude 2 if they put the time in it. As I have mentioned before, I have done so with Claude 2 and have been able to bypass many AI detection tools using my prompts. I think you presented a good product, but it really isn't necessary.

    • @enjoyi123
      @enjoyi123 Рік тому

      Do you mind pointing me in the right direction for when it comes to coming up with these prompts? No need to share them here, just maybe offer one or two helpful hints so I have a starting point for my own research?

    • @haroldpierre1726
      @haroldpierre1726 Рік тому +3

      @@enjoyi123 You can start by doing a search on "what are ai detection tools looking for?" Then make sure you use that information to improve your prompt. In your prompt, write "don't plagiarize". This works great with Claude2 but not well with the others (Bard, GPT-4). There are other instructions you should place in your prompts like make it readable for a certain grade level. My prompts are about 150-200 words. It's been an eye opening experience what you can do with a good prompt. Your prompts may differ depending on what you are writing. However, I expect my prompts to get even longer as I learn more.

    • @enjoyi123
      @enjoyi123 Рік тому

      @@haroldpierre1726 Awesome! Thank you so much for taking the time to respond! :)

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому +1

      I agree Harold, if you have the time to do all of that. I think it's definitely possible to disrupt the patterns that are produced by large language models enough so that an AI detector could not figure out it was used. Tools like blog assistant just make it faster and easier.

    • @bero3356
      @bero3356 10 місяців тому

      @@JWestdigitalplease reply What is the most effective tool for using research articles to create a scholarly blog and exclusively cite from those articles? This should be done by utilizing in-text citations. And I cannot put humor in there.

  • @MattJonesYT
    @MattJonesYT Рік тому +1

    If I just put "write to avoid AI detection" in the prompt it fools most detectors. I think it's a waste to try to avoid it, better is to have it write for a readable style and ignore what the AI detectors say.

  • @call.memaybe
    @call.memaybe Рік тому +1

    Hey Jason! Was trying to reach you via email. Do you accept any partnership invitations?

  • @bero3356
    @bero3356 10 місяців тому +1

    What is the most effective tool for using research articles to create a scholarly blog and exclusively cite from those articles? This should be done by utilizing in-text citations. Please reply

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  10 місяців тому

      Thats not something I have efver needed to do - try using chatgpt. With the right prompt I am 100% sure it can do it.

    • @bero3356
      @bero3356 10 місяців тому

      @@JWestdigital thanks

    • @bero3356
      @bero3356 10 місяців тому

      @@JWestdigital do u think Claude is better?

  • @chrisgironde6669
    @chrisgironde6669 Рік тому +1

    All videos by Jason are AI written ?

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому

      I always do my videos freestyle as I can't stand using scripts.

  • @darlamckinnon4546
    @darlamckinnon4546 Рік тому +1

    Do you think anything will pass Winston???

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому +1

      I'm not sure if I wrote an article with my own bare hands, it would pass Winston to be honest 😄

    • @darlamckinnon4546
      @darlamckinnon4546 Рік тому

      @@JWestdigital LOL.

    • @darlamckinnon4546
      @darlamckinnon4546 Рік тому

      @@JWestdigital There is one thing that passes Winston. It's called AISEO and it's a scam. It inputs symbols between letters

    • @rua999rua999
      @rua999rua999 Рік тому +1

      ​@@darlamckinnon4546Ha yes I remember this from a long time ago.. I'd say Google loves that content 😂

    • @darlamckinnon4546
      @darlamckinnon4546 10 місяців тому

      @@rua999rua999 I've been passing Winston but now I am not passing GPT Zero and that's the one I need to pass

  • @wonderboy855
    @wonderboy855 Рік тому

    Thanks for info and your transparency

    • @JWestdigital
      @JWestdigital  Рік тому

      Any time!

    • @bero3356
      @bero3356 10 місяців тому

      @@JWestdigitalplease reply What is the most effective tool for using research articles to create a scholarly blog and exclusively cite from those articles? This should be done by utilizing in-text citations.

  • @The_Stranger1349
    @The_Stranger1349 Рік тому +1

    hahaha, this was a funny video, man.
    I am sick and tired of these AI Content Detectors.
    For me, ChatGPT and WordAI work perfectly. sometimes GPT produces straight-out human text, thanks to my masterful skill in prompt engineering ;). Along with a bit of polishing with Grammarly.
    Originality and Winston can eat poop for all I care.

    • @muneshwarsinghal655
      @muneshwarsinghal655 11 місяців тому

      Hi are you a content writer can you please tell me if word AI is reliable to purchase or not?

    • @The_Stranger1349
      @The_Stranger1349 11 місяців тому

      @@muneshwarsinghal655 I stopped using Word AI, as it messes up the readability score.
      Just use GPT-4 for content writing. But you'll have to spend good amount of time with quality prompts.
      Focus on creating quality content. Forget about AI Detection, google does not care about it.
      Do competitor research, fill the gaps.

    • @bero3356
      @bero3356 10 місяців тому

      What’s the tips you can share. Thanks