Concentrating whole mass atCentre of mass

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024
  • A beautiful question by a student about COM

КОМЕНТАРІ • 203

  • @bindhyachalgupta5571
    @bindhyachalgupta5571 Місяць тому +91

    The best awarded teacher of India!!
    From
    Moscow Russia

    • @frickingcore1o_
      @frickingcore1o_ Місяць тому +14

      bhai russia pahuch gaya ... padhai karne 🌚🌚

    • @bindhyachalgupta5571
      @bindhyachalgupta5571 Місяць тому +6

      @frickingcore1o_ I am also teacher....

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Місяць тому +25

      Thanks. I wish you go ahead of me.

    • @TechAzureAvi
      @TechAzureAvi Місяць тому +10

      ​@@frickingcore1o_Sari umar mai joker sa Banya phira 😂😂

    • @Red-acted-t7m
      @Red-acted-t7m 28 днів тому

      ​@@frickingcore1o_ brainrotted kid

  • @rajiballiashayar
    @rajiballiashayar Місяць тому +31

    you are the pride of india .
    I have meet you sir ❤
    I am Raji from Ballia Uttar Pradesh

    • @Dhannajay_sharma
      @Dhannajay_sharma Місяць тому +1

      भाई मे भी ballia से हु

  • @sudiptoatutube
    @sudiptoatutube Місяць тому +21

    Sir, I am very lucky that I am born in the same era where the greatest teacher of the world Sir H C Verma is also born. I grew up reading your concepts of Physics in the year 1997 when I was in class 11 and the same book is kept with all care and now my son studies from the same book who is in class 11.
    I have deep love and respect for you sir. You have made Physics so much lovely and enjoyable. My Pranam 🙏

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for your kind words, your love and respect for physics is inspiring. Where are you placed? pl write at hcverma@iitk.ac.in

  • @jitendrachoyal1747
    @jitendrachoyal1747 Місяць тому +4

    Being a teacher one can learn how calmly things can be explained
    Thank you sir

  • @ribhav_official
    @ribhav_official Місяць тому +25

    sir you helpd me clearing this concept your videos and books are filled with knowledge

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Місяць тому +12

      thanks

    • @abcd-j4j
      @abcd-j4j Місяць тому

      ​@@hcverma2928Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?

    • @durga10686
      @durga10686 Місяць тому

      Sir how can I ask you digram based questions​@@hcverma2928

    • @ekamdeep128
      @ekamdeep128 13 днів тому

      ​@@abcd-j4jagar next year ews expire ho raha hai jossa counselling se pehle toh tumhe dubara ews certificate bnavana padega. Woh reject ho jayga counselling mein. So better be prepared 👍🏻

  • @MSG37.....R
    @MSG37.....R Місяць тому +2

    सर आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम के लिए 1 किताब पब्लिश किया जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम बच्चों के लिए मेहनत किया । ❤❤

  • @SandipRiju-hk5ob
    @SandipRiju-hk5ob Місяць тому +1

    Great Teacher
    Love you sir from West Bengal ❤️❤️

  • @AkshatNh744
    @AkshatNh744 Місяць тому +107

    Sir my name is Akshat I am from class 10th I am always confused that why an ammeter is connected in series and a voltmeter is connected in parallel also why the current divides in parallel connection and voltage divides in series connection, I have heard that the current always travels the shortest path so why does the current travels through our body (with high resistance) when we touch a live wire why does it not travels through the copper wire only isnt it the shortest path ??

    • @uttu2008
      @uttu2008 Місяць тому +26

      Cuz the current will travel through shortest path, low resistance and high potential difference.
      If the current passes through our body it will directly reach the earth, which as 0 potential. That's why

    • @garvitagarwal56
      @garvitagarwal56 Місяць тому +11

      BECAUSE IF WE CONNECT VOLTMETER IN SERIES THEN VOLTAGE GOT DIVIDED ON THE CONNECTED COMPONENTS EX BULB SO VOLTMETER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE SAME WITH THE AMMETER IN PARALLEL CURRENT GET DIVIDED IN BRANCHES OF THE SYSTEM IF WE CONNECT AMMETER IN PARALLEL THEN IT IS NOT ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL CURRENT AND REST OF YOUR QUESTION REGARDING THE CURRENT FLOW THROUGH BODY AS WE KNOW CURRENT FLOW DUE TO POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE i.e. is voltage and as current cannot flow from lower potential difference to higher potential difference so it flow through our body as we are connected to earth potential is considered to be zero so thats why current flow through body not flow back in copper wire i hope you are ablee to understand it

    • @garvitagarwal56
      @garvitagarwal56 Місяць тому +2

      ok

    • @uttu2008
      @uttu2008 Місяць тому +9

      Ammeter is connected in series cuz it measures current which is constant along series.
      Voltmeter is connected in parallel cuz it measures voltage which is constant along parallel

    • @uttu2008
      @uttu2008 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@garvitagarwal56exactly

  • @bindhyachalgupta5571
    @bindhyachalgupta5571 Місяць тому +8

    So great energetic teacher!!

  • @unknowndevian28
    @unknowndevian28 Місяць тому +21

    The student must be a student of Saleem sir 😅😅😅

    • @Khan-pk7tr
      @Khan-pk7tr Місяць тому

      Why????

    • @unknowndevian28
      @unknowndevian28 Місяць тому

      @Khan-pk7tr unhone ye definition galat btayi thi aur ise galat proof bhi ki thi

    • @Khan-pk7tr
      @Khan-pk7tr Місяць тому

      @@unknowndevian28 which batch??

    • @unknowndevian28
      @unknowndevian28 Місяць тому

      @@Khan-pk7tr arjuna 2024

    • @Khan-pk7tr
      @Khan-pk7tr Місяць тому

      @@unknowndevian28 bro saleem sir ne kes batch Mai pure chapters karaye complete physics jes Mai prhya hu sir ne o batch konsa wala hai ??

  • @alicengrande3429
    @alicengrande3429 Місяць тому +4

    More appropriate definition of COM is ,it is a point in a space about which net mass movement is zero.

    • @Alive6371
      @Alive6371 12 годин тому

      Really ? Thanks for the information 👍

  • @mohammadinamullah9380
    @mohammadinamullah9380 Місяць тому +5

    Pranaam Gurudev.

  • @Newtown-t40
    @Newtown-t40 29 днів тому

    Thank you Hc verma sir this doubt never clicked in me but the answer of this doubt cleared my whole doubt about centre of mass thank you 😊

  • @pankajsarang1067
    @pankajsarang1067 18 днів тому

    Awesome... I really need this...❤

  • @jsaifi7402
    @jsaifi7402 Місяць тому +2

    So C.O.M is that special position which does not let us to loose faith in those equations which we learnt and derive by introducing concept of POINT OBJECT.

  • @sakinabibi-zy1yn
    @sakinabibi-zy1yn Місяць тому +4

    Sir please give a lecture in our school... you're my best of all time teacher sir please sir 1 lecture...
    My name = saniul Hossain Thander
    Class=xi
    Stream=science
    School=akra saktigarh rabindra vidyapith..(in west Bengal)
    Please sir one lecture 🙏

  • @allaboutphysics4111
    @allaboutphysics4111 3 дні тому

    Centre of mass of a body is a unique point in or along which if a force is applied then the body will exprience only translational motion no rotational motion.

  • @anaamikaaa
    @anaamikaaa Місяць тому

    thank you sir , i had the same query in regard of a hollow sphere and it got resolved almost after 2 years.

  • @physicsplanet2627
    @physicsplanet2627 Місяць тому +1

    With matter no one can reach there but with wave nature it is possible to all!

  • @shouryanandi7463
    @shouryanandi7463 28 днів тому

    Love you sir , from West Bengal

  • @SudhanshuRana-p7c
    @SudhanshuRana-p7c 24 дні тому +1

    Thank you sir ji

  • @Siddharth-u4d
    @Siddharth-u4d Місяць тому

    Same doubt in my mind thanks Sir fir clearing this

  • @KT_IITG
    @KT_IITG Місяць тому

    Very Clear Explanation.

  • @defenceleague
    @defenceleague Місяць тому +1

    🎉🎉Sir ,ek video banaiye ,about difference between Shell,sub-shell and orbitals.
    Sir ye doubt koi clear nhi kr paya

  • @rohitkumarconceptofstudy
    @rohitkumarconceptofstudy Місяць тому +1

    ❤❤ charan sparsh guru 🙏 ji

  • @MirAniq-e3x
    @MirAniq-e3x Місяць тому +2

    Thank u sir❤❤❤I am mir aniq

  • @VedangAgarwal-wg7ds
    @VedangAgarwal-wg7ds Місяць тому +1

    Hats off to you sir

  • @Yash1951official
    @Yash1951official Місяць тому +5

    Best explanation sir

  • @embeddedsystems2704
    @embeddedsystems2704 Місяць тому

    Very Nice Sir Thanks..

  • @Aaditya_shah
    @Aaditya_shah Місяць тому +4

    Good evening sir from Nepal 🇳🇵

  • @FreedomForMe
    @FreedomForMe 28 днів тому +1

    Aachrya prashant ❤️ ❤️
    Climate change 💀 🥇

  • @NiyamGoyal
    @NiyamGoyal Місяць тому +1

    Sir please explain the consevative and non conxervative property of electric field
    This is the toughest concept to understand, as electric field is conservative in electrostatics and non-conservative in current and induction

  • @mango_study
    @mango_study Місяць тому +1

    Sir aap se pdne ka mn kr rha h.... isliye pure lecture UA-cam pr record krke dal dijiye

  • @priyanshuranjan578
    @priyanshuranjan578 Місяць тому

    Sir happy chhath puja🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @___krishna_editor__
    @___krishna_editor__ Місяць тому +2

    Sir jee advanced ka question karo please 😢😢😢😢😢

  • @OjasRane
    @OjasRane Місяць тому +2

    Sir I have mailed you a question about your Shanka Samadhan Video of "Mathematical Clarification". Sir please answer the question.
    Thanking you in Anticipation..

  • @Kinshudubey-qm4gm
    @Kinshudubey-qm4gm Місяць тому +4

    Sir !!
    I have a very interesting question for you about magnetic field .
    Sir why every magnetic field lines are close curve around any magnet why not in shape of rectangle or any other shape why always close curves

    • @adityaroy-zg8xw
      @adityaroy-zg8xw Місяць тому +1

      Tangent should be defined for direction

    • @chitraR._holistic
      @chitraR._holistic Місяць тому +2

      As a 10 class student....
      Keep compass on the north pole of magnet ...
      if we will mark the tangential direction it automatically will be going curved because South pole is also attracting that compass needle .....also there would be only one tangential direction of the figure formed hence it's a curve..... Hence it forms a loop ....also inside the magnets there are also magnetic lines helping it to become entire curve.... 🙏🙏

    • @ExplorifyHub_
      @ExplorifyHub_ Місяць тому +1

      Bro tell me why every magnets have only close curve shaped magnetic field lines why not in rectangle or any other relevant shape​@@chitraR._holistic

    • @chitraR._holistic
      @chitraR._holistic Місяць тому +1

      @@ExplorifyHub_
      Bro as I told in above comment that these things are practical and if we will keep the compass obviously its tip of needle will be towards the north from the south and if we'll mark the tangential direction ofc it will be a curve moving south to north .....
      We don't have proof of all these things coz they are practical things ....
      Rest, idk more than what I explained।।।।🙏🙏

  • @NikitaPatil-ku8sx
    @NikitaPatil-ku8sx 15 днів тому +1

    Sir please teach physics of jee adavace with playlist🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏👨‍💻👨‍💻

  • @C______NS___J
    @C______NS___J Місяць тому

    Sir please make a video on earth magnetism please🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @DarkSun-e6z
    @DarkSun-e6z Місяць тому +8

    Sir please tell how to ask you my doubt

    • @shrutii.28
      @shrutii.28 Місяць тому

      email kr skte ho tum sir ko

    • @DarkSun-e6z
      @DarkSun-e6z Місяць тому

      @shrutii.28 e-mail ID bata do please

  • @BIBEK1729
    @BIBEK1729 22 дні тому +1

    Sir, my name is bibek mera question yeh tha ki velocity of the particle at geostationary orbit usko haam V""=√GM/R+h likh sakte hai.. where h is the height of that particle from that surface..
    Suppose, humne ek lamba rigid rod length (L) and L=h to jo formula hoga linear velocity ka woh V'=(R+L)w (w= angular velocity of earth) (w=1/R√GM/R) to jo linear velocity ayega woh V'=((R+L)/R)√GM/R hoga.. toh V''=V' hoga kyuki linear velocity to same hai.. to agar dono ko solve karu toh L=h hona chahiye lekin woh nahi ho raha aisa kyu??

  • @learngeoscience
    @learngeoscience Місяць тому +2

    Sir I am a geologist and earth scientist by profession, I have a question that all the time come in my mind.
    Sir what would happen if we encircle an volcanic mountain with a gigantic solenoid, my imagination and intuition is telling me that all the metal within the magma will attract towards it and start accumulating on the periphery of this mountain and if it is true then we can actually extract this metal if it is economically feasible.

  • @suraj-ug8mj
    @suraj-ug8mj 24 дні тому

    I respect you for how simple and accurate you've made physics. But what do you mean single particle? Single particle would mean a blackhole. because a point is considered as small as planck's length . A point at which all mass concentrates is a blackhole essentially. Had we considered a sphere of certain radius greater that schwar..radius, then that sphere would have meant to be a centre of mass that can behave physically consistent with the motion of the rotating object.

  • @shyampandey6886
    @shyampandey6886 Місяць тому

    सादर प्रणाम Sir 🙏🙏

  • @NiyamGoyal
    @NiyamGoyal Місяць тому +1

    Sir can you please explain the phenomenon of x ray bombarding on an gold leaf electroscope

  • @Vishalkumar-xe2wq
    @Vishalkumar-xe2wq Місяць тому +2

    Sir please tell me the wavelength of black color. If black color appears due to no light emerges (reflected/refracted etc) from any source , then how the images of black objects is forming in the retina.

    • @गेमिंगकीदुनिया
      @गेमिंगकीदुनिया Місяць тому

      simple जब कोई लाइट रेटीना पर नहीं जाती।
      कन्फ्यूजन इस लिए होता है क्योंकि आंख खोलते ही आंख में हमेशा रोशनी जाती ही रहती है, ऐसा कभी नहीं होता जब खुली आंख में रोशनी न जाए शायद ऐसा अमावस की रात को हो लेकिन तारों की रोशनी भी तो पृथ्वी पर आती ही होगी 😉 @slevelpro

  • @GaneshPandey-c2z
    @GaneshPandey-c2z Місяць тому

    Thank you sir

  • @crazyff_yt007
    @crazyff_yt007 18 днів тому

    Sir agar aap 11th aur 12th ke phy ke imp chapters ke oneshot bana dena tho maa kasam IIT bacchon ka khel ban jayega mere liye.

  • @shivanshraj6571
    @shivanshraj6571 29 днів тому

    @HCV Sir, charan sparsh
    aapko apne doubts kaise bhejein?

  • @MutualFunds-ep2ty
    @MutualFunds-ep2ty 10 днів тому +1

    sir light pe gravity lagte hai please tell me

  • @teena-sh
    @teena-sh 27 днів тому +1

    • Why is -x +(-x)= -2x but -x(-x)= x²? I meant to say that why is the product of two negative numbers positive?
    • What does n⁰ exactly mean? What is its theoretical definition?
    I've been scratching my head 🙃

    • @OjasviNone
      @OjasviNone 15 днів тому

      Areyy see
      Minus multipiled by minus = plus
      And
      Minus + minus = minus
      Actually these are the rules of algebra which we study in grade 6 7 and 8th

    • @OjasviNone
      @OjasviNone 15 днів тому

      n⁰ pronounced as n to the power of zero
      See this simply means we will multiply n , 0 times
      Now as uk that 0 means nothing so , it means we multiply n 0 times thaat is nothing times simply meaning n will not be multiplied
      So n⁰ = n only

    • @teena-sh
      @teena-sh 15 днів тому

      @@OjasviNone Rules were set by keeping some things in mind. I wanna know the reason, I have studied the rules. Thanks for the answer.

  • @vinaygautam3533
    @vinaygautam3533 Місяць тому

    Thank u sir ❤

  • @SANATANI_RAVI
    @SANATANI_RAVI Місяць тому +2

    ❤❤

  • @Sachinuniverse.600
    @Sachinuniverse.600 Місяць тому

    Sir universe ke bare me kuch bataye please 🙏🙏🙏

  • @imaginewithpeople
    @imaginewithpeople Місяць тому +1

    Sir where an electron takes energy to orbit the nucleus for as long as it exists

  • @Sachinuniverse.600
    @Sachinuniverse.600 Місяць тому

    Sir universe bare me kuch bataye please 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @JeeadvanceAIR1-m2h
    @JeeadvanceAIR1-m2h Місяць тому +1

    Sir I have a question does wave hav mass ???? (( If not then how they exert force and how they have momumentum ,and also by de brogli hypothesis particle can show wave nature so partical have mass means wave have mass ?????)

    • @SwarajPawar-yx1dp
      @SwarajPawar-yx1dp Місяць тому

      You are correct , a particle having certain mass behaves like a wave (has wavelength) and waves like light and cathode rays have mass (thus KE). But a massive particle (let us consider a tennis ball) having more mass and low velocity compared to a photon or electron, has a negligible wave nature (this has near 0 chance of passing Young's double slit). Similarly a high velocity particle with negligible mass (what we consider as a wave) would have negligible particle nature (thus you won't feel like getting gunshot after pointing a laser beam on hand , that's negligible Kinetic Energy). Hope that clears the doubt.

  • @viraj9463
    @viraj9463 Місяць тому

    You are the best teacher.
    Your concepts are beneficial in learning and knowing the depth of physics👍👏👏👏

  • @mannatamin8800
    @mannatamin8800 Місяць тому

    Sir what is the correct method to solve movable pulley questions?? Pls make a video on this

  • @abcd-j4j
    @abcd-j4j Місяць тому +1

    Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?

  • @dm_Deadpool_7870
    @dm_Deadpool_7870 Місяць тому +1

    Hello Sir my name is Mohan Kumar , I study in class 10 I have a question related to Q Light chapter.. sir when I pass light rarer to denser medium its move towards the normal but when we passes a light through a concave lens its move away from normal sir tell me why it happen I am very happy when you answer my this question

  • @Shaur_yas
    @Shaur_yas Місяць тому +1

    Sir I am shaurya Singh from class 11th sir there is a ques. of Transfer of heat.. on which I have doubt...The ques is - A body cools from 60°C to 40°C in 7 min.The temperature of surrounding is 10°C.After next 7 min. what will be its temperature ?
    Sir..why we can't take the initial temperature 60°C with time 14 min on the place of taking initial temperature 40°C with time 7 min ??

  • @amiteshdas5361
    @amiteshdas5361 Місяць тому

    Sir I have doubt in law of addition of vectors... If a body is pulled by 2 people and each person is pulling the body with velocity v.. then we see the body to be moving at velocity v.. but if we apply law of vectors then velocity should be 2v.. What is the error?

  • @raghavgeete6372
    @raghavgeete6372 Місяць тому

    sir I am raghav
    I have a doubt form class 9th and now studying in class11 which is like
    why the moons orbit doesn't shift towards the sun as the gravitational pull of sun is more in comparison to each other also if we subtract the forces applied by sun on moon to the force applied by earth on moon then also the resultant force is towards sun ??

  • @diaaa698
    @diaaa698 Місяць тому

    👍👍

  • @imaginewithpeople
    @imaginewithpeople Місяць тому

    Sir I am Pritam my questions is when an electron takes energy to orbit the nucleus for as long as it exists

  • @RaushanKumar-b2p
    @RaushanKumar-b2p 20 днів тому

    Father of physics padam shree

  • @SunilYadav-z8q6c
    @SunilYadav-z8q6c Місяць тому

    Sir kya center of mass ka concept isliye hai taki hum kisi bhi complicated body ko replace karke center of mass pr Maan sake taki hamara calculation easy ho jaye

  • @SujitKumar-qv4dw
    @SujitKumar-qv4dw Місяць тому

    Sir why there is an electric and magnetic field in em wave even there is no charge there .

  • @DhandeepKumarNath
    @DhandeepKumarNath Місяць тому

    Sir i have a question on Gauss's law of electric flux...is gauss law applicable for all medium?

  • @Thegodparticlezz
    @Thegodparticlezz Місяць тому +1

    Sir i am a student of class 9th
    My question:
    If we are moving frame and see objects then objects which are closer to is are appear to move fast in backward direction but when we see distance objects it move slowly so when we increase distance of object from us it's speed of moving toward backward is deacreases why🤔🤔🤔🤔,
    ~ Gaurav Kumar

    • @arjunxc
      @arjunxc Місяць тому

      you should email him to get answer of this question

  • @ppolinaidu5133
    @ppolinaidu5133 Місяць тому

    Sir my name is polinaidu , how we multiply resistance interms of v/I bothe are same quantity or capacitance interms of charge divided/ voltage , and inductance formula

  • @nilotpalpuzari
    @nilotpalpuzari Місяць тому +3

    Let's the radius of the coin be R,
    And we toss the coin in three ways
    A. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.9R from center
    B. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.5R from centre
    C. Thumb is hitting the coin at the centre
    Question: If the force of hitting the coin is same for all cases, will COM gain the same height in all three experiments?
    I think no,
    Because in A and B the coin will gain a rotational KE (as it will spin) in addition to its vertical translational motin. So the same energy will be used in both translational and rotational KE.
    Whereas in C the coin will not spin and and hence will attain max height.
    Am I right or I am not getting something?

    • @xavier-bv6yd
      @xavier-bv6yd Місяць тому +1

      You are right but just missing a small point. Try to figure it out.

    • @dindayalsingh1618
      @dindayalsingh1618 Місяць тому

      I think it is torque which cause rotation not force so com will, have diffrent height due to diffrent value of torque

    • @hcverma2928
      @hcverma2928  Місяць тому +15

      I am impressed by your logical thinking. However the initial energy is provided by you during the flicking. If you apply the force for a time dt, the displacement of the point of contact is different in the three cases. So they start with different total kinetic energies (rotational and translational). Finally they will reach the same height.
      Xavier-bv6yd: Sorry, I interrupted. You wanted Nilotpal to think more on it which is what I also generally do. But I knew that I will not come back to this post, so could not restrain responding. I rally liked Nilotpal's questioning spirit.

    • @गेमिंगकीदुनिया
      @गेमिंगकीदुनिया Місяць тому

      same hight पर नहीं जाएगी अगर force same है तो hight त्रिकोणमिति के रूल का पालन करेगी

  • @DevAmbience
    @DevAmbience Місяць тому

    Sir i have a question my name is ankit kumar and my question is which theory is correct SPDF or KLMN

  • @Roy_Romantic_
    @Roy_Romantic_ Місяць тому

    Modern time ke Rishi Muni ho aap sir🙏

  • @Pradip__sonii
    @Pradip__sonii 7 днів тому

    Sir mujhe electron samjhna ye actually me kya hai

  • @EtherealAizen
    @EtherealAizen 17 днів тому

    Sir, I have a question. I am a student studying in class 10th. I am not really interested in 10th class physics but when I thought of magnetism randomly, I got a question. What is the magnetic field made of? The magnetic force is an invisible force. Is there any way to visualize it other than just lines?

    • @OjasviNone
      @OjasviNone 15 днів тому

      It is made up of moving charges uk when electric charhes move then they generate current as well as magnetic field

    • @OjasviNone
      @OjasviNone 15 днів тому

      We are not just visualising the magnetic field actually by the experiment of one of the activity of iron fillings in ncert book we got to know about its actual path where we can feel the impact of the field

    • @EtherealAizen
      @EtherealAizen 15 днів тому

      @@OjasviNone you didn't get me there. I wanna know what the magnetic fields are made of, their composition, Not how they are made. We currently know magnetic field or force as an invisible force. It really is not invisible, we call it invisible because we cannot see it. For example:- Gravity is an invisible force and some theories use gravitons to define them. The charges have their own field yk. I heard it is made because of mediating of photons not sure I want Verma Sir or some physicist to clarify

  • @sonicthebuzzcat
    @sonicthebuzzcat Місяць тому

    Sar i had a question
    Say a block of mass m is moving initially with a velocity v⁰ and the coefficient of friction u=Alpha×X. AND at centre X=0. Find max power developed as a function of x co-ordinate.

  • @TechCoding-nv6pq
    @TechCoding-nv6pq Місяць тому +1

    like who want to a video on THEORY OF RELATIVITY😍😍😍😍❤❤

  • @SOMEONE_you_KNOW.
    @SOMEONE_you_KNOW. Місяць тому

    Sir does light have mass ?

  • @khushiVerma82501
    @khushiVerma82501 Місяць тому

    Sir myself Khushi Verma
    I want to ask that while studying radiations
    If we consider the example of hotspot technique used in Test. Cricket matches to detect whether the ball has touched the bat or not, so when the ball approaches near to the bat isn't it possible that due to their high mutual attractive force of attraction as distance is very small the surface of bat gets heated up and liberates radiations which may get detected by the camera and converted into visible spectrum and misjudgement may be there?

  • @rahulrawal6410
    @rahulrawal6410 Місяць тому +1

    hello sir i am a student of class 10
    i have an doubt in physics that is
    a square loop occupies more area than a circular loop, both are made of equal length of wire. is it true or false?
    i found answer but it cannot satisfy me
    please solve my problem as quickly as possible
    thank you
    yours sincerely
    NIDHI SHARMA

    • @mdataharalam
      @mdataharalam Місяць тому

      Circular loop ka area jyada hoga

    • @tutormbvlogs1947
      @tutormbvlogs1947 Місяць тому

      It can be proved using maths that square and circle having same perimeter, area enclosed by circle will be always more than that of square.

  • @rachanasrivastava9604
    @rachanasrivastava9604 Місяць тому

    Sir pranam . Sir I am kushagra Srivastava wondering about why if sun get disappeared then how much time it will take for earth to be free from sun gravitational field. sir I concluded 8 minutes after lot of searching but I don't know the reason why did this can happen.sir please if you have time please check out this question.

  • @AbhishekKumar-gb7vm
    @AbhishekKumar-gb7vm Місяць тому

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @dhruvsinghvi4107
    @dhruvsinghvi4107 Місяць тому +1

    Hi Sir, first of all thank you so much for your contribution to education, your book has inspired me to pursue physics.
    Secondly sir, I had a related question relating to rotation and COM. If we apply a force on an object NOT going through its COM, we analyse using a torque with the axis being through the COM. Fundamentally, WHY does a free object even have to rotate when a force is applied not passing through its centre of mass, and why is that rotation always about the COM?
    Thanks,
    A Grateful student.

    • @einsteineducator2159
      @einsteineducator2159 Місяць тому +1

      When a force is applied to an object in a way that doesn’t pass through its center of mass (COM), it induces both translational and rotational motion. For a "free" or unconstrained object (one not fixed to a pivot or axis), the COM acts as a natural balancing point for rotational motion. The object’s rotation around its COM allows for the simplest form of motion that preserves its angular momentum. This is why when we observe objects spinning freely, their rotation naturally centers around the COM.
      If we tried to analyze rotation around another point, the math would become more complicated because it would involve additional fictitious forces. Analyzing rotation around the COM simplifies things.
      If you choose a point other than the COM as your reference for rotation, the object’s inertia and the force distribution will create complex internal torques and fictitious (non-real) forces. These fictitious forces arise because the rotation is no longer centered at the COM, and thus, they don’t represent any real physical forces acting on the object.
      Newton’s laws for translation and rotation work seamlessly around the COM. When you analyze around the COM, you can apply Newton’s second law directly to calculate the translational acceleration of the COM and apply the rotational form of Newton’s second law (τ=Iα) to calculate the angular acceleration.
      Analyzing around the COM reduces the problem to dealing with just the actual forces and torques present, without introducing complexities of extra terms.

  • @ShubhamKanaujiya-vx3qw
    @ShubhamKanaujiya-vx3qw Місяць тому

    In electrostatics why we take only positive charges on surface

    • @abhixeditz18
      @abhixeditz18 Місяць тому

      Free electrons also exist on Surface of Metals....

  • @apoorvvyas52
    @apoorvvyas52 Місяць тому

    Sir, please explain about rotational kinetic energy being zero. That question is left unanswered in your explanation.

    • @pritampramanik1729
      @pritampramanik1729 Місяць тому

      In the example of coin flipping, you saw the motion called trans rotational. We can easily study the translational motion using COM. And for rotation we won't assume all masses concentrated at centre, rather it's a rigid body. We will study the motion with respect to COM which breaks down our problem to pure rotation. So the Rotational Kinetic Energy wrt COM isn't zero at all. It's (1/2 Iw²) , {I =1/4mr² for coin here}. There will be translational KE as well which is 1/2mv² & yes v is the velocity of centre of mass. Hope you got it :)

  • @Davidatrium45
    @Davidatrium45 7 днів тому

    Sir isme aapne com smjhane me jyda samay liya lekin jo sawal tha usko shi se nhi smjhaya....agar wo com ka sawal puch rha h to iska mtlb usko basic defination ya baaki jo video dhayn se dekh rhe h unhe to yeh pata hi hoga...kripya aap agli baar se sawal ko jayda samay dijiye kyuki baaki log bhi aapse kuch naya seekhna chahte h kyuki jo aapne bataya wo to aapne apni kitaab ne bhi diya hua h

  • @sachinrajpandey5242
    @sachinrajpandey5242 Місяць тому

    Then kinetic energy is of centre of mass only, not of entire disk or ring, is it right please explain Sir.

  • @officialvikram234
    @officialvikram234 Місяць тому

    Sir mere se physics ke numericals solve nii hote samjh hee nahi aata kya karu please give some guidance

  • @VIDYAAMARALAKSHYA
    @VIDYAAMARALAKSHYA Місяць тому

    Sir Can you please explain about Vector Form of gravitation, its so confusing (r12 and r21)

  • @TechCoding-nv6pq
    @TechCoding-nv6pq Місяць тому

    hello sir i am from UP
    what is the source of gravity

  • @AbhinavKumar-j9j
    @AbhinavKumar-j9j Місяць тому +1

    If (-5)^x=5 then x =?

  • @Soumenpal882
    @Soumenpal882 Місяць тому

    Sir how i maile you my question?

  • @rohitpanthari6516
    @rohitpanthari6516 Місяць тому

    Sir aapse baat ho sakti ho kya.

  • @mahendralowanshi3373
    @mahendralowanshi3373 Місяць тому

    6:00

  • @PratyushKatiyar-h1t
    @PratyushKatiyar-h1t Місяць тому

    Sir mai Hindi medium student hu mujhe aisa lgta hai ki hum log jee nhi clear kr skte
    Pls suggest me sir

  • @uttu2008
    @uttu2008 Місяць тому +2

    I want to ask doubt how pls

  • @musicworldIR1234
    @musicworldIR1234 Місяць тому +3

    why rainbow is seem in arc

  • @hunnysingh4529
    @hunnysingh4529 Місяць тому

    SIR GRAVITATIONAL LAW SAYS EVERY OBJECTS ATTRACT EACH OTHER WHICH IMPLIES EARTH ALSO ATTRACTED BY SUN BUT WHY THE EARTH IS REVOLVING AROUND SUN INSTEAD OF GOING TOWARD THE SUN ?