Sartre: Leading an Authentic Life
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 кві 2021
- An introduction to the philosophy and existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, looking at his phenomenology, his ideas about consciousness as free, as being for-itself.
Are you free? What does freedom really mean? The broadest definition of freedom is to be able to choose, to make decisions that aren’t forced or determined by someone or something else. But aren’t we all born with, into, and are constrained by personalities, skills, character traits, our specific bodies, emotional make-ups, an IQ, an environment, an upbringing?
Don’t all of these things make a me, an I, that constrains my possibilities?
Even if we’re free in the world - free to go where we want and do the things we want to do - surely we’re not free from these personal things. Surely we’re determined by them, they impose themselves upon us. Aren’t we imprisoned by ourselves?
Sartre’s answer is a resounding NO. We’re always free, unconditionally, transcendentally, universally, and more than that, we can choose to create ourselves, to fashion our experience of the world into a beautiful, meaningful, purposeful pattern; a melody.
Through his novel Nausea and his magnum opus, Being and Nothingness, Sartre’s ideas about freedom, anxiety, and the transcendence of the ego are all explored.
Then & Now is FAN-FUNDED! Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Or send me a one-off tip of any amount and help me make more videos:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Buy on Amazon through this link to support the channel:
amzn.to/2ykJe6L
Follow me on:
Facebook: thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
Subscribe to the podcast:
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...
open.spotify.com/show/1Khac2i...
Sources:
Thomas Flynn, Sartre and Marxist Existentialism
Mark Carroll, 'It Is': Reflections on the Role of Music in Sartre's 'La Nausée, Music and Letters
Jonathan Webber, Sartre’s Theory of Character
Sartre, Being and Nothingness
Sartre, Nausea
David Detmer, Sartre Explained: From Bad Faith to Authenticity
Credits:
Jean-Paul Sartre Photo commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Unknown author, CC BY-SA 3.0 NL creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
This mirrors what was illuminated to me after a powerful experience on psychedelics (ayahuasca). The immensity of the freedom led and has led to immense terror at the vastness and infinite nature of choice.
An overwhelming sense of responsibility.
It’s brought me to the brink and edge of madness and suicidality.
Yet I go on, because I do believe in my stumbling I’ll find what I’m after.
Like music, we might be confined by a limited number of "notes," but it doesn't have to stop us from using them to their full potential and creating myriads of unique melodies and sounds. We're always free to experiment with the frameworks we're bound to.
Bounded freedom, bounded choice....
Thanks I really appreciate your comment 💖💋💖💋💖 please kindly contact me with my email address on hangout messager for more coversation
privateemail@gmail.com
The key is to create a harmonious pattern then play within that ;)
@@thelondoners-lifeisart sorry, but thst sounds a little complacent.
Or maybe it's me ,taking Schopenhauerian musings too setiously?
@@jamestcatcato7132 Well, of course--a vivacious piece is one others would want to hear. :)
you express and paint a narrative around these ideas beautifully, never before has such work been made this easily interpretable and digestible. These videos really motivate me on a day to day basic, keep up the good work!!!
basis*
So glad to hear! Much appreciated :)
Àh well said Klaus- I'm so glad I just found @Then & Now
This video needs a second part with your criticisms! ;-)
Oh yeaah
Oh yes please!
Ofc
Always love how much these videos just make me think and appreciate.
What an incredible video! It not only gave me a much better understanding of existentialism through clear explanations and examples, but was also wonderfully edited. Thank you for that! I have never subscribed to a Patreon before, but I'm changing that now and making you the first :)
Also, would love to see even more videos on existentialism!
Excellent! You have clarified many points about Sartre on which I was vague. Thank you.
Look fwd to learning more from you @Then & Now, just found your channel and really like this content. Starting to practice little understandings is quite enlightening etc- its intersting to see the change in ones cogniive system - I can get confused though when i try to understan things predominately in thoughts and words- your videos really help to put words to some of my experiences - which is pretty cool/ helpful
Just loved the way you presented
woah so many great videos recently!
You're on a roll lately!
I like these endnotes.
When I was listening to this narrative I was thinking about the idea of invisible design particularly Dieter Ram. Obviously this is a counter point to Sartre in the sense that influence can be embedded into something unnoticeable. I might also say these two positions are complementary, but not explicitly.
That "Me, Myself & I" with the G-Key was rly cool xD
Well done mate, keep the good work 🙏
Love it man
""👁👁"" What you attend becomes your place of being, of noetic attentiveness, of self wholesomeness, and yet self sense that is sense of consciousness remains transcendent. In all , that is even in transcendence mode, the mind choice is paramount where to stand, how to attend, and why.
You inspire me so much
best channel on here
Kind words, thank you :)
Let's examine your doubts. Thanks. Looking forward to more.
Great video! Keep it up
thanks
Whoah baby, are you spying on my books to read pile? I just started Sarte (see what I did there, with the rhyme, pretty cool huh).
Same. His videos have been really in sync with my reading lately. It’s creepy.
Yes!!!!!
what boulder is that at the start? rekon it goes at about 7a?
Great video as always! Not gonna lie, I was listening with noise cancelling headphones and the dog barking caught me off guard to the point I looked around 🤣 can't wait for more videos!
Haha same
Have you considered doing a video on Husserl? I am curious on what you thing about him. :)
The problem is that consciousness really does need a definition because at present all we can say is what it does not what it is. That said , maybe a functional description suffices but..? Also, even though I'm still 'trying to get a grip' on Heidegger and hopefully I will at some point, you can tell he made a huge impact on him even though I'm guessing that Heidegger would have a lot to say about his interpretation of his ideas never mind Sartre's own ideas.
what is the music in the beginning?
that's such a nice title
Can you do one on Michael Walzer "In Defense of Equality"
Supert ... real good ... givs mening to me !
@12:05 All appellations are synecdoche (plural).
Based
This is one of the most lucid accounts of Sartrean philosophy. I would like to interact with you further. Is there an email I can write to reach you? I am from India.
Thanks!
i finally got it
The thumbnail lacks clef, time signature and tempo. How am I supposed to sprechgesang (yes, I’m verbing the noun like a linguistic anarchist) the words in my head without these points of reference?
Is hard determinism really incompatible with existentialism?
It fits the everything is one theory. You with exactly my life experimce would be me and vice versa cuz u would have my essence
It's interesting, Buddhist philosophy, and to an extent Hindu philosophy as well, share a lot with the phenomenology, theory of senses, and psychological theories that Sartre talks about. Amazing considering the thousands of years and miles in between Sartre and ancient India.
Yet they split in different ways eg. metaphysically in concluding an existence of souls (or not), ethically in what one must do to achieve (or perhaps more appropriately reconcile with) one's freedom...
Would you ever make a chomsky video!?
You didn't mention his relationship with Heidegger
☮️
Maybe you should look at Merleau-Ponty.
Perffect Okeeey
what's the music from right at the start?? Amazing sound
did you find out about this! lol
@@siavashhaman no :(((
The Westerlies - When all of this is Over
There's similarities with the theory of positive disintegration
We aren't allowed to go where we want. We need to ask our overlords to grant us permission.(passports) And this could be removed if they aren't pleased with what we say or do. It could also not be granted by other countries. We also need to comply to the 298575876434797 rules of planes, boats, road laws and the elephant in the room : Money. If you're poor, you aren't allowed to go where you want.
We've been domesticated by the elites and most applaud out of fear. We're pathetic.
The idea about the self being an object in consciousness sounds buddhist.
“This park smells of vomit!”
as a trans person, this analysis really speaks to me. hell is truly other people.
Is hell other people, or just your perception, which is inherently flawed/bound to conceptual instability?
@@eorobinson3 u rly thought u said something here didnt u
@@toritwopointoh He actually did! You took one line completely out of context from Sartres philosophy and are using it to justify your insecurities. If you didn’t pay attention to the video, most of his philosophy centers around the idea that humans are condemned to be free, therefore any identifications that you attach to your being (as you did with literally the 1st word of your comment) is a mere illusion.
@@newyorkalb No? They were talking about the I not the consciousness itself. Do you seriously think that you have zero concept of self-indentity yourself?
And framing being trans as an insecurity is giving things away about your world view. This really seems like a dishonest jab and nothing else.
@@kkounal974 Being trans was not the insecurity I was eluding to and your interpretation, is giving things away about the lack of diversity in your though.
Trans is a mode of being which according to Sartre, is deliberately chosen by the "for itself". The insecurity stems from ones inability to take full responsibility of it's freedom and choices as maintained by Sartre, that ultimately falls into "bad faith".
The overarching idea of my comment was to point out the stupidity of taking out context one line without being familiar with the philosopher and their philosophy. This really seems like a dishonest jab.
Not sure how separating 'self' and 'consciousness' is helpful. Doing this clarifies nothing. It just puts consciousness in a more mysterious, rarified position. It's best to remind oneself, consciousness is a physical, mechanical activity in your body and it's faulty like all parts of your body are faulty. You forget, misremember, misjudge and are unable to cogently string thoughts together. This is no different than blurry eyes, ringing ears, diabetes and constant knee pain.
I understand that as not consciousness
2:13 SITTING in a cafe, where he is THINKING (not thought) about DOING things and maybe BUYING things and SMELLING things and TRYING. Why do Brits think "he was sat" makes any sense at all? Sartre was SITTING in a cafe.
Fantastic video. I think it’s all bullshit
What a load of BS....🤦♂️👽💀
How so?