John Campbell can't process how vaccines are made
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 гру 2023
- Patreon: / drwilsondebunks
I rarely read UA-cam comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly and I will be glad to respond to you when I can:
Email: dr.wilson.debunk@gmail.com
Facebook (direct message): / docwilsondebunks
Document explaining the pre-approval work submitted to the EMA demonstrating comparability between processes 1 and 2: factreview.gr/wp-content/uplo...
E. coli is used to produce 30% of approved therapeutic proteins: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25737...
mRNA vaccine manufacturing paper: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
WHO guidance on RNA-based drug manufacturing: www.who.int/docs/default-sour...
The Cutter Incident: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... - Наука та технологія
I always turn to sociologists when I have technical questions about vaccines. SMH.
You guys are so silly or so stupid. Josh A Guetzkow, the sociologists, wrote an open letter to the BMJ (British Medical Journal) asking why after two and a half years, we have not heard any results of the planned safety analyses, Pfizer mentioned they would do in their clinical trial protocol on the final upscaled product. This is why John Campbell had him on as a guest. And as Josh explains, the reason is simple, Pfizer chose to withdraw the study and not conduct the safety analyses. What went into your arm was never tested, not even on mice. Feel better now?
@@ohbaby-baby FALSE
@@christopherrobinson7541 True. It is a matter of public record.
Ummm.... that's a bit irrelevant. With 1.5 billion doses / 600 million+ people, we have abundant real world data.
All you have to do is look at New Zealand or Japan, who both used 99%+ Comirnaty
@@Muritaipet Irrelevant that we were all guinea pigs? If you really believe that, I have a giant hamster wheel you might be interested in. LOL!
John Campbell:"What is going on?" Nudge,nudge, wink,wink.
You and Dr. Susan Oliver should make a video "Which Antivaxxer/Covid Deniers Are Grifting, and Who Actually Believes Their Own Rubbish?"
I think he did this already with Bob the Science Guy.
The witch blocks people who are able to roast her arguments.
Dr Wilson's video with Dr. Susan Oliver discussing Campbell's origin story is very interesting:
ua-cam.com/video/j5SPZR64-9E/v-deo.html
@@Goodmorning1221- I hope you enjoy your life as a frog in the fish pond.
@@christopherrobinson7541 I hope you get a lot of vaccines and boosters.
Awesome work! As a pulmonary/ critical care/ lung transplant specialist in the US and a UA-camr in the health category, I'm battling anti-vaxxer too. I'm trying to promote proper knowledge for Thai people. It is an unrelenting battle. Once you debunk one thing, they will come up with a bunch more (and many excuses). People love listening to some conspiracy theorists. Those who scientifically debunked them usually don't get many viewers. I wish your channel had more viewers. Anyway, please continue the great work! I'm rooting for you. Happy New Year in advance!
Your battle is like a newspaper printing on the front page an outrageously erroneous story and a subsequent retraction in a microscopic font on page 99.
Well I am one of them people who is on the fence. I listen to all sides and try to make a informed decision. I hope you take a different approach than Dr Wilson because his approach actually makes me more vaccine hesitant. That being said his channel is great we need perspectives like is, but with less cherry picking and dividing people into camps, one side or the other, left & right etc.
@@thefirstwealthishealth5495
Other than risking a sharp picket up your clacker valve, sitting on the fence would be uncomfortable if you stay too long.
Because of their urgency, some decisions should not wait too long, so what method(s) do you use for this particular vaccine?
We rely on only three or four heuristics to settle uncertainties, and I am interested in discovering yours.
On the other topic, please specify precisely what Wooly Willy has said that causes you concern. Anecdotally, I have just had my fourth Jabberwokky and other than the fact that I am dead, it appears to have been a good decision.
I appreciate your attitude, as it indicates a brain that functions in the response rather than the reaction state.
Thanks for your informed interest and respectful contribution.
Prove anything Dr Wilson said wrong from 0:00 to 2:55. @vicguani2108 @@thefirstwealthishealth5495
How about being on the fence when some court accuses Jonathan Majors of "assaulting" someone? You weren't there. And who knows what else went down. He could be protecting himself or protecting somebody else, or even protecting the person who he physically hurt from suffering a much greater harm: being arrested by the police and sent to prison.
@@thefirstwealthishealth5495 Well, when those who don't agree with vaccination cite any research paper, I'll make a video dissecting that paper along with the audience. They will see the actual issues of why the cited paper cannot be concluded the way anti-vaxxers claimed. Actually, many of my medical students can pick up the same issues. I just do not understand how someone with a medical/ scientific or research background could have misinterpreted the data this far off unless they do so for their own benefit. This even happened with one of the renowned Thai professors of medicine.
Grifters gonna grift. "Listen to what they say and then watch what they sell." Thank you, Dr. Wilson!
It's a leading reason why I'm skeptical All the time. I'm a fan of his lab partner there, too.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381427/
@@vicguani2108 the limitations and findings of the cited study are very telling, and probably most importantly "All of the cases had wholly recovered without any irreversible cardiomyopathy changes."
@@bkbland1626 It has too much hair. 😀
Dan has ties to big pharma. Why are you thanking him for grifting?
Using a sociologist as an "expert" to talk about vaccines is like taking plumbing advice from the baker.
Agreed and I say this as a sociologist myself.
So John Campbell interviewed a lesser quality guest. Most are with renowned doctors, professors and researchers though like Dr. Dalgliesh several times recently.
John Campbell brings extremely important information, really pathetic to want to close your eyes for that fact.
@@DutchmanAmsterdam appeal to authority.
John Campbell USED to bring important information. Now he's just a grifter that bring questionable information at best.
@@HCkev You must not have watched his recent interviews with prof dr Dalgliesh to show such ignorance. Why do you think all countries with high mRNA vaccinations still experience 10 to 20% excess deaths, higher than ever before, particularly by young people suffering sudden cardiac arrests? It happened recently to a 42 yo extremely healthy female colleague of mine. The whole thing is far from a joke. But you just keep on trusting the "authorities" good luck with that.
@@DutchmanAmsterdam the problem is it doesn’t matter what information comes out of his mouth, if you aren’t qualified, then don’t talk about shit that you aren’t entirely knowledgeable about, there’s a lot of nuance that comes with expertise like actual doctors that get overlooked when someone who is not an expert talks about this topic.
It's incredible that Dr. Campbell could NEVER have heard of the Cutter incident!
Paul Offit mentions it all the time. Talks the whole story and details. Campbell is such a hack
It´s very very hard to believe, indeed. Like so many other things he drivels about.
But that's simply how John Campbell´s "expertise" works.
Plenty of 'clotter' incidents to speak of these days.
@@RabJ208Voices in your head, give them accents, yes or no?
@@gferraro8353 Racaniello won,t give him time of day!!
John Campbell lying, I'm shocked I tell you, absolutely shocked (snark)!
Around 400 000 people watched a nurse and a sociologist discuss something they knew nothing about. If I wanted to watch an uninformed discussion I would go down my local pub.
So nothing like any previous vaccine then. More like transfection in fact.
Transfection is the process of nonviral gene delivery into recipient cells. DNA, RNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and short hairpin RNA are examples of exogenous nucleic acid material (shRNA).
Facts about Transfection
Transfection is the process of introducing foreign DNA
(DNA source: Plasmids, siRNA, mRNA or genomic DNA) into eukaryotic cells, often with the aim of expressing a specific protein or studying gene function.
The efficiency of transfection can vary greatly depending on the type of cell and the method used, with some methods achieving high levels of transfection efficiency, while others are less successful.
The most commonly used methods of transfection include calcium phosphate precipitation, electroporation, and lipofection, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
Lipofection, which uses lipid-based delivery systems, is one of the most widely used transfection methods because of its high efficiency and ease of use.
Another innovative method of transfection is viral transduction, which uses a viral vector to deliver foreign DNA into cells. This method is commonly used in gene therapy research.
Transfection has a wide range of applications, including the production of therapeutic proteins, the study of gene function, and the development of new vaccines and treatments for diseases.
Despite its numerous applications, transfection remains a challenging process, and there is ongoing research to develop more efficient and effective methods of delivery.
What are the Potential Risks of Transfection?
While transfection can be an effective tool for genetic research, it can also carry potential risks. One major concern is the potential toxicity of transfection reagents, which can damage or kill cells. In addition, introducing new genetic material into cells can alter their normal function, leading to unexpected consequences. It is important for researchers to carefully consider the risks of transfection and take steps to minimize them,
microbiologynote.com/transfection-definition-types-principle-applications/
www.biocompare.com/Bench-Tips/121111-Cellular-Toxicity-Caused-by-Transfection-Why-is-it-important/
www.capricorn-scientific.com/mycoplasma
Furthermore, it is extremely important to use endotoxin-free plasmid DNA for gene therapy applications, since endotoxins cause fever, endotoxic shock syndrome, and activation of the complement cascade in animals and humans. Endotoxins also interfere with in vitro transfection into immune cells such as macrophages and B cells by causing nonspecific activation of immune responses. These responses include the induced synthesis of immune mediators such as IL-1 and prostaglandin. It is important to make sure that plasticware, media, sera, and plasmid DNA are free of LPS contamination to avoid misinterpretation of experimental results.
So let's have a look at what a complement cascade is.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551511/
Your messiah here is just placating the 'vaccinated' test subjects.
As they rot from the inside while blaming it on anything but the transfection.
It is because they only flock to things that will confirm their (blatantly incorrect and invalid) preconceived notions. So they all happen to end up gathering in the few places that spread the majority of the misinformation accordingly.
@@honkstafarian Your have posted that before, do you understand it? From your final comment, apparently not.
Dr John is actually a professor who has taught for over 40 years. I watched videos during covid where he explains how they were made, including the indian covax.
This video is based on this one interview. He has 1000s of videos and interviews.
@@lukeriely4468 He is not a professor he is nurse who got a PhD for making videos Teaching nursing. He is certainly not an expert I have watched many of his videos and have watched qualified people like Dr Wilson. Dr Oliver and Professor Kellogg Tucker debunk his videos
In manufacturing it is common for the initial prototypes to be made using a different process than that used for mass production. This does not mean that the mass produced product is in anyway inferior. I fail to see why vaccine production would be any different.
There appears to be a lot of BS in this video produced by a persistent professional BSer doesn't there?
Anyway, in aerospace manufacturing for example, a safety critical item will be tested as it is for approval. It's then not possible to change the manufacturing process without getting approval for the item with new testing.
Relatively new tech injectables that contain mRNA which is classed as a gene therapy product would of course need far more significant safety testing & changing the manufacturing process would be unacceptable without starting trials again from scratch.
Of course the original trials were at best nothing more than a farce considering the intended scale of use.
@@paulpaul9914 if you had watched the video you are a commenting on you would have seen that both processes were used in the clinical trials and nothing was changed and then you wouldn't have made yourself look stupid
@@paulpaul9914However, using your example of the aerospace industry, I would argue that the production of a prototype aircraft is a different process to the production of service aircraft.
I would argue that your analogy falls down because an aircraft does not consist of LRUs made by the same manufacturer and that those manufacturers are not the airframe manufacturer, e.g Boeing or Airbus Industries. Engines Pratt & Whitney or Rolls Royce, Radars TI, tyres Dunlop , depending on airline being supplied. The airworthiness is certified by the relevant authority in the country of manufacture with annual airworthiness certified by the relevant authority of the base country of the airline.
The quality assurance of individual LRUs are the responsibility of the manufacturers not the aircraft manufacturer.
Pharmaceutical companies are individual companies making a range of products based solely on themselves. Thus your analogy again falls down.
If I want to build a computer from scratch then my method is significantly different to that of Dell, as I am making a one off. I don’t have to have the PSU tested as I buy on off the shelf that is already certified as safe.
@@paulpaul9914 Oh please come back with more Paul, it's been pretty funny so far! The use of E. coli in drug production is not irrelevant since it would be the same potential contaminant issue that Campbell and his sociologist mate were getting their knickers in a twist about. Process 2 was used for clinical trials product, even you acknowledge that by having to insert the word 'almost' in there.
@@paulpaul9914 You've already acknowledge it was used in the clinical trial, the video you are commenting shows you documented evidence of it being used in the trial; there's no need for any more evidence. It's you that said you were going to be coming back with more - we're still waited with bated breath
I’m constantly amused by the “Follow the evidence” poster to Campbells left pointing towards the gold UA-cam award to his right. That really says it all.
Rather ironic.
Jealous?
@@italgong dear Peter, what possible reason could I have to be jealous? I mean seriously?
Like a sociologist knows about how vaccines are made. And people lap this 💩up 😂
What qualifications/,experience does Dan have in the "vaccine making" industry?
@@RabJ208 well he is often called a shill for big Pharma.
Thus he has lots of experience for working for big pharma.
Hope that helps you rather than debate the points he says.
@@stephenwilliams3213, and what qualifications does Dan have relevant to today's topic?
@@RabJ208 read his bio!
I am not his personal resume writer
Campbell lies and you don’t need qualifications to figure that out
@@RabJ208Voices in your head, accents for them, yes or no?
Dad duties while making a debunking video is some true multitasking!
His good lady taught him well.
Cheap click bait as far as i'm concerned. Exploiting his baby for points.
What did he debunk?
Zero debunking here
Nurse Cambell trying to still milk the grifter train, got a taste of that grifter money lol
He may be retired, but I guess it’s not enough $ to afford that fancy boat or whatever it is he’s been eyeing
I remember that reckless video and all the fact-checking I had to do afterwards. His followers were screaming 'bait and switch!', 'they're injecting us with poo!' etc. That's when I stopped watching.
Which video? I gotta see it :)
@@vvandererIt's titled "Pfizer, Process 2."
@francie5161 Thak you.
One of Josh's whines is that there was a change to m process therefore the product must be submitted to clinical trials. In this case it seems falls because the process is essentially unchanged. But....
When there really is a change, of course a clinical trial is needed. However, it would be unethical to run a trial of the new, under test, product, against saline, like new drug trials are often done, Harm to some saline recipients is almost guaranteed.
So what the industry does is to use the already approved, existing, vaccine or remedy, as the placebo. So the new drug should do as well as or better than the placebo used, to succeed in phase 3 trials. This way harm to trial subjects is avoided. Or minimised.
If they use one method of production for the trials, and a different one for the roll out after those trials get approval, that is by definition a bait and switch. Whether it leads to a different quality of vaccine, with a different benefits/harms profile, will only be seen afterwards, and only if it is looked for. The poo comment sounds like a silly remark, not sure why you'd take it so seriously. And the use of an exclamation mark doesn't imply screaming, or even shouting.
Watch his latest vid , then you will be less smug.
Congratulations on your lovely son. And congratulations to your son for having a smart and loving father.
Amen!
and for being part of public relations, that's something few young babies get to do - be used on a youtube video to help corporations control society's policies.
he'll totally thank his dad for it. oh yeah. sure. he'll grow up and say "dad, when you made that mad corporate propaganda and used me as a prop, that's why i love you most"
i happen to be the british establishment's most successful (materially) scientist - since most people here are easily led and no scientist merely telling the truth can survive, i specialised in banking
i am the single most productive wealth creator in the western hemisphere. so as it happens public relations and pics with babies won't outrank you. my media is rising, it's called Network 23, and it will allow the humans to become less stupid
so all the easy money people like the man waving his baby at the public for money there get will vanish. i will give the humans something intelligent to watch instead.
Great video once again, however your lab assistant was strangely quiet. I think he might be sleeping on the job...
And took an unscheduled lunch break
In next weeks show a chef talks about nuclear physics with a carpenter.
For some one who keeps saying "the silence is deafening" he keeps blocking his critics on twitter.
Such a hypocrite.
Campbell is getting paid to say what he says. Nobody smart takes him seriously.
Quite the opposite, but whatever makes you feel comfortable about your life choices, If it weren't true, then it would not be on UA-cam. There are now laws against misinformation, and big tech gets fined for disobeying such laws. I know it is scary to find out you were misled and what has happened, and when looking at the science, it is potentially terrifying for the test subjects.
@@organichumanYou've copied and pasted this lie many times, what a loser.
Unfortunately our world is filled with more dumb people than smart ones.
@rarzarbex9172 you keep following your masters blindly like a good little sheep 🐑 anyone pushing the experimental Vax on young healthy people for a virus that's not much worse than the common cold is a criminal in my opinion. And what about all these excess deaths in younger people. Athletes dropping down dead from heart problems. You can't really argue with the data. Please educate yourself before you go around making ridiculous assumptions 😂
@@organichuman his lies are so easy to prove . He is a complete disgrace to medical profession
Eg have you seen his vaccine in pregnancy video ? He clearly misleads . It is negligent to NOT ADVICE covid vaccine in pregnancy given the very well documented third trimester pregnancy harms to all mother , fetus / baby . Does he mention the ton of research that clearly shows how important vaccine is in pregnancy ? In fact , he is actually tricky and shows something that even did not even happen - an actual update in guidelines on pregnancy
ua-cam.com/video/YUBJ5pgx92I/v-deo.html
I don't think he could process how babies are made.
Lol
True, roofpizza!
Many thanks for your fight!
Your little one is toooo cuùute. What a well behaved little soul :)
That's sad, when the pandemic first started his channel appeared to be a pretty solid place to get facts. Not anymore.
"appeared to be" being the right term to use. Already in the early days it was clear he didn't quite know how to read scientific papers, misrepresenting and/or cherry picking.
He's very clever, because u tube is very strict on antivax misinformation, but he manages to bypass it by not saying directly what he's infiring, maybe more people should report it to u tube
@@glenmason1876 UA-cam will do nothing, as they make quite some money from his channel.
I think Campbell is more interested in processing the success of his grift.
Processing money more like, he's making thousands a month easy, with the views he's getting
It's such a pity when a channel is debunked their revenue isn't transferred to the truth...
That makes sense, cause you don't like something you want their money...
I don't think nurse scampbell can process dairy. He certainly shouldn't be trying to talk medicine well out of his league
He's still allowed on UA-cam and I got an ad for a chiroquacktor pushing some fake supplement even whilst watching a debunking of pseudoscience. UA-cam sucks so badly at times.
The ADs that you get are different in each country and are tailored for each viewer. Be careful what you watch.
He is a scam artist at this stage. He drives me nuts. Cos he should know better. Happy Christmas and new year.
Facts and truth are never a scam.
@@aland2465 oh really is that why this clown John Campbell lies so much ? By the way he has a lot of confidence in the dumbness of his own audiences and knows he can fool them every time . Did he victimize you as well ? Many times ?
So very true . Campbell is a disgrace to medical profession. Selling his soul for a few bucks without a care how many his misinformation harms
@@aland2465 yeah but lying to his own audiences purposefully to fool them just to get rich without a care who he harms ? That’s about as low as it gets for a provider . He is a disgrace to medical profession
As a nurse (or ex-nurse), John Campbell must have many medically-qualified contacts that he could call up to explain vaccine safety on his show. Instead, he gets a sociologist. It's almost like he's intentionally dishonest for clicks and cash. Weird.
''It's almost like he's intentionally dishonest for clicks and cash'' Oh I am not the only one that has noticed that then!
its not weird at all. He is now a multimillionaire from essentially being a morally corrupt scam artist.
@@vicguani2108 Bill Gates is not pushing fear and false information. Campbell is.
@@debtpeon lol he bribe everything he knows he can expose him..
I'm triple vaccinated but my advice to those UNVAX don't get this experimental jab www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381427/
a lot of young people die in my country. main cause of death is pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest. recently, the manufacturer included myocarditis in the leaflet. case? I don't think so
Really clear and thorough presentation. Thank you.
Thanks Dr Wilson for your excellent debunk of JC & Co...yet again. I hope many will also check out "Back to the Science" with Susan Oliver, who is also on his case like a rash, exposing the clever deception he constantly peddles.
Erm it seems Oliver uses Facebook factcheckers for her info..... wow.
Bio chemical weapons are not the subject MD's should be debating.. This clown hasn't got a clue about what this is. His academic qualifications confirm how dumb he is.
Erm, Dr Oliver's videos mainly reveal comprehensive details of relevant scientific studies, along with exposing fibs and errors relating to some that craftily cherry pick such things to mislead their followers.@@italgong
Yeah try and debunk his latest video. Tell me this insane s*** is not happening!
Thank you for your continued efforts. You should win an award for this relentless work. Excellent explanation. Thank you.👏
Hi, i used to enjoy watching Campbell, but stopped when he started with the nonsense, but ive got a few questions, You said that some of the vaccines from procsss 2 were included jn the test, Do you have a number or percentage? Shouldn't the trials only have been process 2 as 1 wasn't administered?
Also the graph shown at 5:10 appears to show only process 2 not a head to head as you said..
Such a cute baby, 🤩
Thanks for all your work with this. cheers
The details are in the Phase II/III report.
@@christopherrobinson7541
@christopherrobinson7541
might like to supply the numbers not mentioned in the video, they can also explain why the numbers are not mentioned in the video.
They could also explain why the depFunkering Bumkum video also doesn't mention that there are significant differences between producing insulin using e.coli & producing mRNA for an injectable therapeutic using e.Coli.
& Also why the depFunkering Bumkum video omits to mention that there are significant differences between producing the mRNA using process 1 & producing the mRNA
using process 2.
In ga they did not need to test process 2 at all . The product is not any different in any significant way. Tens of thousands were dying each week . If prices 1 was used in manufacture it would be very slow to roll out and a lot more expensive .
There was absolutely no use for retesting with that product and in fact t incredibly harmful as tens of thousands would have died waiting for a product that is not different .
Now after billions of fuses the vaccine safety is well established so these two clowns who raised the question have nothing but personal agenda without a care who they farm
@@christopherrobinson7541
The details are not in the phase II/III report
Provide the numbers & data -
Number of trial participants given process 2 product & the trial results for those participants.
This is not the first time that John Campbell has epitomized Dunning Kruger. Shortly after the start of the pandemic, he put out a video asking why certain drugs that were effective on HIV couldn't be used to combat all RNA viruses. Not understanding basic principles of molecular biology seems to be an issue that he needs to work on lest he misleads again.
He doesn't care if he misleads. Most of his fans are already misled anyway and pretty far down the conspiracy rabbit hole.
Toward the start of the pandemic he also said that preprint studies weren't worth the paper they're written on, and a few months later they were the basis for his entire channel.
I don't think it is Dunning Kruger. More likely, it is deliberate grifting, but it could also be cognitive decline, aka dementia.
@@willem1642 Looks like he has developed quite a high level of paranoia as well.
You really don't like people asking questions do you
If it weren't such dangerous information - it was literally one of the most hilarious imitations of an expert I've ever seen.
Its infuriating that campbell is riding the grift this hard...a sociologist...really? GTFO with that nonsense
I think Johm Campbell should stay in his area of education and experience, namely, teaching nursing students basic anatomy and physiology in Great Britian. This assumes of course, that he still has teaching credentials in that country. Then again, you don't need an education or credentials to "educate" naive people on UA-cam with a world wide audience. You just need "Likes" and the more the merrier, as in Cha Ching.
thank you thank you thank you
Thank you for the accurate description.
I have been involved in vaccine development for 10+ years and worked for 25+ years in protein biologics development and also manufacturing.
I don't understand why John C didn't have at least as 2nd voice someone who understands what he / she is talking about.
so you know it isn't a vaccine
but a coronavirus spike protein psuedovirus
How disappointing it must be to spend your entire life developing something that you meant to save people with to have CIA use your work to democide .
Now you know how Einstein felt when he watched his invention incinerating babies.
I think your new co-host is after your job!!! 😅🤠💜
I hope more people will study and discuss the “audience capture” effect that seems to cause people formerly known as rational to fall into full-blown conspiracy believers and a willingness to lie. Tons of “influencers” have the choice to shift toward content that will garner clicks/money, but for ethical reasons, they don’t. What makes someone like Campbell unable to resist falling into the dark hole?
A glance at the sentiments in his comment threads vs. his comments of three years’ ago is a clear picture of just how far (and extreme) his account has become. Is he *proud* of the community he’s building now? Years’ ago it was medical students. Today it’s extreme conspiracy theorists who love to use the word “sheep.”
Spot on, Kathy. Controversy sells and manufactured controversy sells more often. The genuine science educators know this but resist the urge for easy cash because they are actually ethical and want to be a benefit to society, not their bank accounts.
I followed him kind of early in the pandemic but unfollowed when I caught a few things that just didn’t pan out when I checked it against other sources. He just started getting really obsessed with nurses not aspirating the needle and its potential cause of myocarditis. Thats where I finally left his channel. It actually wasn’t until he was mentioned on TWIV that I realized he was an RN with a PhD in nursing education. I myself am a nurse but because his channel is called Dr. John Campbell I totally thought he was an MD. It’s intentionally misleading.
@@4everyoung24 Out of interest, do your nursing colleagues know of him? and what do they think of him? Personally I don't understand why the RCN or NMC haven't done anything to distance themselves from him as they did with Kate Shemirani being struck off.
@@4everyoung24 He has a complete obsession with Vitamin D as well.
Why are we not addressing Dan's childish behaviour? Surely anyone who goes online using terms like "goober" "grifter" and "conspiracy theorist" to describe others who they dislike is noting short of sad. For a man who looks like he could be in his 40s or arguably 50's acting like an 11 year old is very sad. Imagine what dan was like when he was 20 if this is how he acts as a middle aged man?
Your computer makes errors, cyclicaly. But mostly you don't notice it.
Thank you for being the voice of accurate science.
mRNA vaccines are US Military BI0WEAP0NS 😂
I prefer merogenomics
He couldn't even spell it..
He has gone full fledged conspiracy. It’s such a disappointment.
I’m mad I used to rely on Campell as a source for the latest Covid info. Thanks for making me realize that’s a bad idea. I’m embarrassed at myself.
Me too, but I think Campbell was genuinely trying to be a voice of reason in the early days of the pandemic, before the grift went to his head.
@@basslinedan2Right, he was advocating for vaccinations early on. At some point, he did a sharp 180 for grifter clicks. He’s very good at the grift - so good, I’ve wondered if he believes his BS.
@@ivoted-5489 It's a weird phenomenon. It's like some people see the increased engagement they receive by "challenging the narrative" and they just can't help themselves.
@@ivoted-5489If you watch him you can tell he knows he is bullshitting
Campbell changed, after he made a podcast singing the praises of Ivermectine and saw his popularity explode.
Suddenly he was earning serious money, by pandering to the antivax / antimask / anti lockdown / conspiracy theory crowd.
He was actually a pretty good source of information around 2020
I'm not aware of any sociology accreditation program that requires completion of university pre-med sciences as a prerequisite &/or includes completion of a Baccalaureate science degree... very different post secondary educational pathways.
A sociologist isn't an expert in medicine or virology, nor qualified in those specialties.
Of course, neither is nurse Campbell.
Also, Nurse Cambell is an educator who got a Doctorate in Health Education or studied Philosophy. It's unclear.
Anyway, He has overstepped his competence & science knowledge, because he isn't qualified as a virology expert or medical doctor, so it's not surprising his interpretations, comments, and analyses are often incorrect.
I'm an electronics person, but have learnt a lot from Dr Cambell. So i'm not a virologist. I can still see clearly that even the
data shown here proves that the two batches aren't identical. You NEED to prove the differences don't matter, or shutup.
'cos the rest of us are LEARNING, and we need evidence to work with, not charicter assasination.
This factual information re: Dr Campbell's credentials, is to highlight the fact that he isn't an expert in virology or vaccine medicine, and as a science educated health professional it's obvious to me that he is teaching misinformation. His mistakes are concerning because they are highly biased, cherrypicked & is promoting the Antivax conspiratorial agenda. Bad science bothers me. Dr Wilson's opinions should be respected, since his expertise is valid.
I believe that politically biased misinformation is harmful.
Another good Covid science educator & misinformation corrector is Dr Susan Oliver.
Both Dr Wilson & Dr Oliver have produced many excellent videos, and will provide links to scientific research studies in their comments, description, or videos. Check them out. Definitely worth the deep dive if you want to learn facts about covid-19 &/or vaccine science. ua-cam.com/video/j5SPZR64-9E/v-deo.htmlfeature=shared
Happy New Year Dr Wilson 😊
When he first started Campbell was not so fruit loopy and talked some sense but at some point he drank the kool aid and should be ignored. He is disingenuous with his Dr. sobriquet he has an educational PhD not a medical Dr.
Thanks for another brilliant video explanation of Campbell & Co's bulltrap Dr Wilson. Much appreciated 👍
And all the very best for the new year to you and yours 🎉❤
*Deleteful* : Adjective (from Urban Dictionary, _modified_ )
When a deceitful _commenter_ is deleting _posts, comments or replies_ to hide _embarrassment, dishonesty_ and/or a guilty conscience.
Examples "Jasper-11 is really deleteful"
There is more spews forth from the mouths of Campbell et al than you will ever encounter in your baby's diaper.
Thank you for your continued work to debunk these mendacious fraudsters.
Wishing you and your family the very best for the New Year.
Grow up
how is he a fraudster.. he supported vaccines early on and came to the conclusion they were dangerous..
Great show, papa! At a certain point JC made a hard left into some strange bullsh*t. It would appear that $$$ and crazy fundamentalist ideology warped this guy's ability think critically and/or be honest. It's disheartening...and potentially dangerous for those who are influenced by this joker.
I would have said he made a ‘hard right’. At his age, this is a golden opportunity to make more money then he could when he was working. He has no morals. He doesn’t care if people are harmed by his nonsense.
@@dragonphoenix8 Fair point. I wasn't thinking of the political spectrum, thinking more like "left field".
It's a discussion ? Just like what your doing in here .
Can any of you hear that echo !!??
Thank you!!!!!
No matter which side you lean toward…the POINT is INFORMED CONSENT. No relevant medical info should be CENSORED for anybody’s “SAFETY/ own good”. Allow everyone equal opportunity to consume all info and let people make their choice. I watch you today & listen to John tomorrow, both sides, pros & cons, but most importantly I will weigh this against all my 1st hand info and life experience that I observed. Too many people that I know who went and got multiple shots of mRNA now have new medical issues that their doctor “can’t explain the cause” but when asked about the temporal adverse effects to receiving spike mRNA & excess deaths, these pharmaceuticalized medical professionals are sure “it’s not the shot”.
Exactly
Ditto here - except I know hundreds of people that got either Pfizer, Moderna a couple who got J&J. Everyone is fine. Now, maybe there's something up with Astra (I think I did read some oopsies with that vax). Perhaps that's why Campbell is so anti-vax on COVID.
Dr John is talking a lot lately about excess deaths since the roll out of the vaccines, what’s your thoughts ?
It's curious that Campbell ignores Age Standardised Mortality (ASM) falling in the UK. I've looked at English speaking countries, so I can't comment on the whole world. But ASM has also dropped in the USA, Australia and New Zealand.
What are your thoughts on that?
Mick, ignore the teen Muritaipet's reply and go watch the latest 1-hour long interview of Tucker with Bret Weinstein. It's pretty revealing.
@@paolorossi5989 Ohhh dear, the most boring thing since watching paint dry is back. What you should do now, is endlessly repeat all the same dull hacks you've been doing for months.
@@Muritaipet Sometimes I want to climb on top of one of the highest mountains in the world and shout from the bottom of my heart " *Muri-cringe-teen-pet* , where are you? Are you alive?"... then I suddenly remember that the creature literally lives in the comment section of the 🤡 Wilson's videos. 😂🤣😂
@@phillipproussier3723 Tee hee. Poor little Pee Pee. Am I living rent free in that little bitty head
Congrads on the little one, thanks for taking the time
It is incredibly depressing. I first found his videos on general health topics, and they were interesting and informative, but I didn't watch too many of them. I started regularly watching his channel at the beginning of the pandemic, and his roundups of the news from different countries and public health organizations was invaluable. When he got something wrong, he would correct it in the very next video. He read the comments and took constructive criticism. He talked about the exact precautions he was taking. He promoted the public health efforts of other people working in the field in under-served areas. He wasn't perfect, but he was someone who was making a concerted effort to be helpful and trustworthy, which was incredibly refreshing in the era of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump's "handling" of the crisis. And then, I have no idea what happened. Could it be as simple as money/notoriety? Did he only have a veneer of professionalism that he later dropped? I just don't understand, and it still makes me sad and angry.
I think his descent started with Ivermectin
I think we all went through the same regarding Campbell. As with Neil, for me it was Ivermectin: I saw he had a video on a dodgey meta analysis that had been done and was expecting him to point out the flaws but then couldn't believe what I saw!
@@neilthompson8668 Definitely agreed. It was SO depressing to watch.
@@NonFlyiingDutchman The question you really need to ask yourself is, "why was Ivermectin not allowed to be used"?
Although it is a safe drug, safer than aspirin, why was it demonized?
Watch some one else then !
Oh you are..
Thank god .
Try not to turn on Mr "debunker" here !
He needs your likes 🤣
Thanks for the video
I fail to see where people have a problem finding and understanding global data comparing the jabbed to the unjabbed and, in so doing, see the value of the jab.
What evidence is there that the jab saved anyone's life? Give examples? Did it save you from catching "covid" ? If so, how do you know? Did your friend tell you "the jab saved you" ?
You find what group you belong to. It's so easy to manipulate people these days. I'm still yet to see an unjabbed child have a heart attack though, so I'll stick to reality rather than lies
Awesome video as usual. And congratulations on your new baby.
Excellent!
Congrats on your new baby!!
CORRECTION: Cutter incident didn't just involve the one company after which it was named, there were many.
INCORRECT The problem occured in one company, but the consequences affected all companies manufacturing the product, until the cause was identified. The details are in the Paul Offert's book, the Cutter Incident, of which I have a copy.
@@christopherrobinson7541 I was quoting Paul Offit himself from Beyond the Noise IIRC
@@logicsconscience They shut down all production as a precaution until they found the cause of the problem. The issue was, as Paul Offit explained, on Beyond the Noise, was confined to one company, where they had not followed the full process and had not checked that the virus had been adequately attenuated. The whole process was reviewed and found to be sound, but more rigorous testing and reporting was introduced. Production was restarted in a few months.
Cutter when out of business.
The FDA introduced new requirements for testing and reviewing vaccines (and drugs), including reporting of adverse events.
Thank you. You serve humanity. Please keep on the task. I’ve bought you a coffee.
I have no expertise on vaccine, but have studied genealogy and seen tens of thousands of birth, death, and marriage records. Before vaccines were available death rates were very high. Some families lost child after child after child. Even adults often died young.
Before vaccines were available we had dirty water , poor sanitation , poor hygiene , no refrigeration little or no education , less medicines and generally a lot less information . The apparent success of vaccines is largely supported by a whole host of other very important revolutions in understanding and promoting health . To credit only vaccines is at best simply dumb and shows very little understanding . At worst it is totally corrupt and has a lot of questions to address and answer . With the spotlight now beaming into this subject expect major revelations regarding the real benefits of vaccines . Follow the money !
Neither do I, but I do know that developing a relatively safe vaccine takes 10 to 15 years.
Why does nurse campbells expert have the vocabulary of a fast food restaurant employee?
You know he didnt read any of those books behind him.
"Goo" 😂
@@May_Day45 are you asking because you were never held as a child?
@@May_Day45 you do understand it's the end of December and almost the new year which means the holidays so the Dr. Is spending time with his child.
Do you know what December 25th is?
Do you know what January 1st is?
@@May_Day45 Can you give us some examples of a channel failing and the posters bringing out their kids or pets?.......or did you just make that up?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman mayday lol is asking for help
He was never held as a child by his father and wants to understand why a man would do such a thing with his infant
@@May_Day45 2 videos with less than 100 views and 3 subscribers and you are saying Dr. Funk is failing?
😂
TY. (You remind me of my Dad holding the baby. Dad worked for Sabine, BTW.)
I suspect Skidmark doesn't like being called Skidmark.
He's changed his actual channel name from "70skid" to "SidewaysSid". He will continue to reek of course.
@@Jasper-11 Muritai is meaningful to me Jasper. Feel free to look it up. (Edit - and look up it's meaning in Te Reo)
Skidmark reeks, because he is purely a troII, with no interest in truth. I'd encourage you to be the opposite.
@@Jasper-11 BTW, I see you got rid of your "shill" comment. I'll point out again, that being deleteful doesn't help your credibility.
@@Jasper-11 You've just asked me a question Jasper. You know the deal. When you answer mine, I'll answer yours.
@@Jasper-11 Also a question Jasper. Refer to my previous answer
@@MessiahNonEst You're still doing skidmark aren't you?
You said ""Germ theory (of respiratory viruses) has never been proven".....but surely by now you know that nothing can be proven, you even failed to prove that the sun will rise in the east and set in the west and just resorted to 'trust me bruh'.
And all Rosenau did was show that for the very uncontrolled and limited experiments he did that he didn't show human to human transmission. That's not proof that it can't happen.
Thank you.
Cute baby! Congratulations and Happy New Year!
I'm a hospital administrator and I've heard of bacteria producing drugs. John Campbell should be ashamed of himself.
I'm a retired USAF aircraft mechanic and I've heard about bacteria producing drugs. Thought this was somewhat common knowledge.
well bacteria make vitamnin b2 as well.
Bet you don't know much about transfection either.
Transfection is the process of nonviral gene delivery into recipient cells. DNA, RNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and short hairpin RNA are examples of exogenous nucleic acid material (shRNA).
Facts about Transfection
Transfection is the process of introducing foreign DNA
(DNA source: Plasmids, siRNA, mRNA or genomic DNA) into eukaryotic cells, often with the aim of expressing a specific protein or studying gene function.
The efficiency of transfection can vary greatly depending on the type of cell and the method used, with some methods achieving high levels of transfection efficiency, while others are less successful.
The most commonly used methods of transfection include calcium phosphate precipitation, electroporation, and lipofection, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
Lipofection, which uses lipid-based delivery systems, is one of the most widely used transfection methods because of its high efficiency and ease of use.
Another innovative method of transfection is viral transduction, which uses a viral vector to deliver foreign DNA into cells. This method is commonly used in gene therapy research.
Transfection has a wide range of applications, including the production of therapeutic proteins, the study of gene function, and the development of new vaccines and treatments for diseases.
Despite its numerous applications, transfection remains a challenging process, and there is ongoing research to develop more efficient and effective methods of delivery.
What are the Potential Risks of Transfection?
While transfection can be an effective tool for genetic research, it can also carry potential risks. One major concern is the potential toxicity of transfection reagents, which can damage or kill cells. In addition, introducing new genetic material into cells can alter their normal function, leading to unexpected consequences. It is important for researchers to carefully consider the risks of transfection and take steps to minimize them,
microbiologynote.com/transfection-definition-types-principle-applications/
www.biocompare.com/Bench-Tips/121111-Cellular-Toxicity-Caused-by-Transfection-Why-is-it-important/
www.capricorn-scientific.com/mycoplasma
Furthermore, it is extremely important to use endotoxin-free plasmid DNA for gene therapy applications, since endotoxins cause fever, endotoxic shock syndrome, and activation of the complement cascade in animals and humans. Endotoxins also interfere with in vitro transfection into immune cells such as macrophages and B cells by causing nonspecific activation of immune responses. These responses include the induced synthesis of immune mediators such as IL-1 and prostaglandin. It is important to make sure that plasticware, media, sera, and plasmid DNA are free of LPS contamination to avoid misinterpretation of experimental results.
So let's have a look at what a complement cascade is.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551511/
All I asks is that you don't go too hard on Dr Campbell. Yes he took one injection at the beginning but he has since admitted that he was fooled and realised his mistake and is now making amends.
I doubt John was suggesting he hadn't heard of bacteria producing drugs before, though it would have benefited the conversation if he discussed that briefly. The point is that a different process can yield different results. If there are differences between the adverse reactions seen in the trials versus the rollouts of the vaccines, then a responsible medical community and government would want to try to explain that. Possibilities include that the trials were poorly conducted or fraudulent, or that the vaccines differed in some significant way. Both may be true. To test if the latter might be true, then we would want to look into the processes used, both for production and for storage/transport and administration of the vaccines, and identify any discrepancies. Given there is also evidence pointing towards different batches of the vaccines having different safety signals, I'm not sure why anyone would want to instantly discount the theory that the processes used in the mass production of the vaccines might have been insufficient to guarantee a safe product for all.
Awww, such a cute baby❤!
Do you have an insert with the ingredients
You yourself can easily find those ingredients. Just type "ingredients", "FDA", (or "EMA") and the vaccine name in a search engine, and you'll get a link to the regulatory documentation, which includes a list of ingredients.
For the FDA documents it is in the package insert document, section 11.
Thanks again funky fraudster finder!
John Campbell is a great example of the damage bad ideas can do to a good mind. If you go back to the beginning of his show, you can see his evolution into a now, fully off the rails quack. He probably had a healthy skeptic sense, but decided to jump all the way in at some point. I watched every episode from the start, I saw it clearly. Something got in his head and he took it from there.
When you see your income sky rocket in 2020 from the pandemic that you start a private company with 4 family shareholders I think ones motivation could actually change. Just a thought.
Me too, at the beginning of the pandemic I watched every video of ‘Dr’ Campbell’s but stopped and unsubscribed as soon as he went antivax and he started spreading fear and lies. Shame on you Campbell!
Where you wrote "but decided to jump all the way in at some point." ....... I think I saw that moment.
He put up a video titled "Ivermectin disappoints in India". There was a massive howl of protest. He changed the title.
@@MuritaipetThat is really interesting, shall endeavour to find said video.
@@lindaward Good luck, but I suspect you won't find it. As noted the title was changed. I did go back to try and find it, so I could quote the video. And I failed in that endeavor.
The video featured an Indian doctor and I think was in 2021. Perhaps you know of a system that can help filter? Otherwise there's probably 100+ vids to screen.
Thank you 🙏
Thank you? Do you actually take what Dan parrots seriously? Why would anyone of sound mind listen to or worse take seriously the words of someone who uses terms like "goobers" and "grifters" to express themselves? You lot are a different breed for sure. Lol
What an adorable baby. Good video too :)
Maybe if it had become a nasal spray, the evangelical optimists heads would have exploded?
(Fear of needles trauma).
Thanks for your excellent work. I live in the UK and started watching John Campbells channel to get some scientific background on what was actually going on with Covid. Recently I started noticing that he was getting into some questionable territory but, not being a scientist, I couldn't pin down where he seemed to be going. I can only offer my own testimony that, after 4 full doses of vaccine, I have suffered no ill effects whatsoever.
Dr Susan Oliver has made a number of videos documenting Campbell's disinformation ua-cam.com/play/PLV1WqH0isjRxTQUVyeZHBt-V35YeAknnW.html&si=-OXJAvQJYGfTODxQ.
Prof Greg Tucker-Kellogg has also made some (Biotech and Bioinformatics with Prof Greg).
Have you seen any of Dr Wilson's earlier videos exposing Campbell's misrepresentations?
@@lindaward I have not.
Likewise, and I’ve never gotten Covid!
i’ve had a similar experience with the channel, where i was recommending his channel as a trusted source during the pandemic yet I noticed a shift around the time he had Russell Brand as a guest.
You’re lucky then. I had 2 and got hearing issues. Wish I had have known that the Pfizer jab was dangerous for certain people with ear related issues. We would have known this if it was tested properly. Sadly, some of us get to find out the hard way.
Not only are Campbell's videos dangerous and misleading, but this "expert" is a disgrace to sociology (mind you, he's not alone in that). Thank you again for your work.
Campbell plugged the covid vaccine in the beginning, then started to question things, particularly when side effects became evident. He has also become very critical of the WHO - quite rightly so and keeps his finger on the pulse as regards unexplained excess deaths in many countries.
There is nothing "dangerous" about him or misleading as he always backs things up with the relevant data.
To me Dr Campbell seems a trustworthy person - whereas this Dr Wilson clutching a baby whilst making this video comes across as dishonest and completely untrustworthy.
Ps. I had decided not to take the covid jab long before I came across Dr Campbell.
@@andreaerling7614 Campbell is deliberately misinterpreting information to deceive his gullible viewers. He is a real world threat because he is influencing his viewers in them making decisions to be vaccinated or not. This could result in the vulnerable not being vaccinated and potentially suffering severe illness and/or death.
I thought Dr. John was sound for a long time. I am still interested in some of his observations. Can you address the excess mortality that he has been promoting as an issue in the years since the worst of the covid-caused death period of 2020-2022?
Great job again.
They must both be joshing us.
Great Video Dr Dan. I'll help spread it around on Twitter.
The problem was they sold it as a vaccine, when it was just a shot, 😂😂😂😂😄😄😄😄
If only that were the only problem.
Awesome vid as per usual. It's weird that in my recommended next to this vid was a sad boyz podcast. I guess youtube thinks Dr.Wilson looks the same as Jarvis.
Thanks for another great video! Also, congrats on the beautiful baby!
yeah, keep it going Doc
Why it’s not possible to post a link to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi’s press conference where he discusses the differences between the approved method for the vaccine production and the actual mass production?
If you are interested in a second opinion which you should be since science comes first.
Emotionaler Auftritt von Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi auf dem 2. Corona-Symposium der AfD-Fraktion
He can understand process how to process patreon.
If there is ‘nothing to worry about’ why did these companies sue for and achieve shielding from injury lawsuits?
They never sued for that?
@@steveoxocube "Because in the 1970’s ambulance chasing lawyers were filling so many lawsuits, that making vaccines was a loss making exercise for pharmaceutical companies. "
Perhaps it is important to add that this would be the case *even if the companies would win all lawsuits that were threatened.* Some people have this weird idea that if you win a case against you, you will get all costs paid by the other party. This isn't the case, and is one reason why one often sees out-of-court settlements even in cases where the defendent could actually win the case.
Huh? They are not protected from injury lawsuits in a plethora of countries, including the US and the UK. Even in countries like New Zealand, where nobody can sue anybody over an injury, they can still be sued for punitive damages.
You should read the history of vaccines and how dumb courts awarded prices to those who were not actually injured by vaccines . Vaccine development is an extremely expensive process and cuts down big pharna profits big time as instead of selling and reselling medications repeatedly to billions of people a few cheap vaccines take care of everything . Most pharmaceutical companies stopped making vaccines putting whole humanity in danger . That’s why governments took over vaccine injury ( because every reductive has adverse effects for example and ibuprofen kills more yearly than all vaccines combined ) . So injuries from normal adverse effects is not pharma responsibility . This step saved humanity. Negligencevon pharma part still pharna can be sued successfully . Some body mislead you big time
Love the video especially with your new guest. Your baby is so well behaved.
The new start line
"I am Dan Wilson and I'm a scientist, and this is and he is a baby".
Love it!!!@@christopherrobinson7541
CORRECTION: The baby is well sedated by the multiple jabs.
Oh he knows how, he just became a grifter mid-way through the pandemic.
Or he woke up based on the obvious facts and date that emerged?
@@aland2465 no he is a just a liar and it’s so easy to prove . So in your dumb opinion when people wake up they start lying and misrepresenting data and facts ? Are you in your senses ?
Well done. Thanks.
This might be more of audience capture than anything else unfortunately. :/
was too distracted by baby to follow the video tbh
I recently found your stuff, I like it so far. Just wanted to encourage you to keep going. Have a good day :)
This is the only channel I will watch because everyone else is a grifter.
Dr Susan Oliver at back to the Science, is no grifter. Give her a gl.
a sociologist 😳🤣
Hey, that's what Los Angeles County had as the head of its pandemic response!! She won't show her face in public ever again.
'maybe' as part of a multi disciplinary team but head of...😳😬@@Lp78Ch