I don’t want to contradict you but from experience and personal understanding I found the epistemology of Islam in the Quran to be emotional and perceptual i.e. we have hearts for understanding and eyes which can see signs etc. So people have disease of the heart or ease of the heart and Islam brings ease of the heart because it brings peace. tranquillity sincerity etc. These emotional states are signs of the benign nature of the religion, and as such a sign of the truth because knowing the truth is good for one. ( analogy: it is good to know what size of shoes fits one feet and one will experience comfort and a pleasant life if the shoes fit). A lot of the abstract arguments like unmoved mover and even the cosmological argument and things like arguments from design seem unnatural to me in the context of the Quran and its epustemology as far as I understand it. It is not rationalistic or conceptual for the main part, but more contemplative and experiential and based in perception and qualities of conscience and feeling similar the idea of bonafide ( good conscience / faith) . The western philosophical arguments seem to be based in developments around the Trinity which is an unnatural theological entity whereas belief in Allah is more natural and it is the naturalness of the belief which leads to the sincerity and the peace in the heart - and these emotional qualities are amongst the signs.Rather than having to depend on abstractions Muslims can defend their faith to themselves with concrete and empirical realities. The claims in the Quran which are epistemological seem to be based on having eyes and ears and a heart which is not screened but rather open to the truth. The shackles mentioned in surah Yasin indicate the distorted and twisted nature of the heart and experience of self which is typical of unbelief. On the other hand, the things like peace in the mosque peace after prayers trust in one’s friends, the beauty of uncluttered life, the good conscience of knowing charity and it’s benefits, the sensation of having a clean mouth after brushing teeth these are all aesthetic and emotional or conscience related phenomenon rather than abstract intellection. I think it was Pascal who taught of the God of the philosophers being redundant to him after religious experience. Although some of the signs such as peace or beauty and not sooo overwhelming as an intense religious ‘vision’ may be,, they are not pure conceptual logical arguments. That’s my experience and understanding, we come to no God and the truth is the religion in part through reflecting our experience in a more calm, peaceful, Zen-like manner, rather than needing to devour and assimilate the conceptual inferences of the philosophers. And experientially in terms of perception of the external world for example the beauty of a forest would be a sign not because of the intricate nature of its design but because of the phenomenological qualities pointing to a higher creator, the aesthetic properties of the natural world indicating as things seen something beyond them. This is not to say I don’t “get” the abstract arguments, but they generally don’t have the kind of aesthetic consequence that salat does or zikr does. Often when atheists require evidence for God they are diverted away from every day reality to abstractions, by so called apologetics experts, whereas in the Quran I think we are driven away from abstractions to towards an aesthetic, and conscience related and emotional epistemology which refers back to everyday life. Hsn (beauty and goodness) are often understood aesthetically and in terms of feeling and conscience. Scientists sometimes talk about beautiful arguments and elegant theories, but the primary usage is in the everyday world, thank you sheikh.
Can you please do a debate with mar mari, especially after what has occurred do to the delusional persons responds to when someone argues against islam, make it right and show the propper way.
I believe in Allah. But I always feel that in Islam a woman is nothing less than a prisoner of home. I am making this comment after reading certain fatwas on the internet. Of course I don't know Arabic but this feeling I get is from the society where I reside. So, I humbly request @Asrar Rashid-official to clarify this for me.
This is absolutely false. Women are elevated in status through islam. So much so that Muslims have fought entire battles for the safety of just 1 woman. The reality is that islam transcends all societal flaws, and is the most prosperous and moral a civil society could be. Yet we all know that we don't live in a utopia. There will always be someone to take advantage of the weak & naive. There will always exist predators & prey for as long as life exists on earth. The best case scenario is to be able to protect our families & loved ones from being preyed upon. This is the job of a man because of the natural instinct to protect is ingrained in us the same way a mother is ingrained with a maternal instinct for children. Everything in Islam & its laws are in place in order to guide us to live a civil life in any situation. Examples of women having to cover up is purely in the intrest of the woman and her safety, physically, mentally, reputationally, ect. Imagine a sick person assaulting a someone because they look "easy" or cuz they have seen suggestive pics/videos of them. Imagine creeps cat calling your wife as she walks to the store. Imagine seeing your own mother or sister naked on the internet as a kid. Imagine being embarrassed to be seen with your family. These are all things that Islam protects us from as best as we can. These issues deteriorate families, which in turn deteriorates our society. This is not the fault of a man or woman. But continuing to ignore the the increasing immorality due to the concept of "equality" is just plain foolish and unproductive.
No. Madrasa never have these issues. One or two incidences can not be based to defame madrasa. Sorry we are not agree with you. Madrasa made the muslim strong muslims
Some have, for sure, but for many atheists including myself, it’s more of just a logical thing. Becoming aware that religious claims have not met their respective burden of proofs. It’s only natural to be an atheist
@apersonontheinternet8354 actually you are wrong. There have been multiple studies with children that have proven that humans innately believe in one god.
@@Shoujo_o that’s bizarre since going by logic itself and how our brains fundamentally work, we don’t believe anything when we are born. It’s not innate. Try again 🤷
@apersonontheinternet8354 We're born knowing nothing? Is a baby trained to latch onto their mother's breast? Cry when they are hungry? You're the one not being logical. You can reject it all you want, but the truth and research are out there.
This is totally wrong because you are giving hukum on كل from بعض الاجزاء which is totally wrong. When the hukum can be given on كل from أكثر الأجزاء .so Atheism can never be called an emotional problem . I think shaykh asrar has forgotten the usools as he is doing Concerts with ahle biddah
Ya Ghaus madad.
Ya Allah madad
अस्सलामु अलैकुम व रहमतुल्लाही व बरकातु
Thanks for the guidance Sir.
Afasr❤
Salam shaykh asrar. Shaykh abdul majid wants to do a podcast could you do it with him would be very beneficial to get to know you more
I don’t want to contradict you but from experience and personal understanding I found the epistemology of Islam in the Quran to be emotional and perceptual i.e. we have hearts for understanding and eyes which can see signs etc.
So people have disease of the heart or ease of the heart and Islam brings ease of the heart because it brings peace. tranquillity sincerity etc.
These emotional states are signs of the benign nature of the religion, and as such a sign of the truth because knowing the truth is good for one. ( analogy: it is good to know what size of shoes fits one feet and one will experience comfort and a pleasant life if the shoes fit).
A lot of the abstract arguments like unmoved mover and even the cosmological argument and things like arguments from design seem unnatural to me in the context of the Quran and its epustemology as far as I understand it.
It is not rationalistic or conceptual for the main part, but more contemplative and experiential and based in perception and qualities of conscience and feeling similar the idea of bonafide ( good conscience / faith) .
The western philosophical arguments seem to be based in developments around the Trinity which is an unnatural theological entity whereas belief in Allah is more natural and it is the naturalness of the belief which leads to the sincerity and the peace in the heart - and these emotional qualities are amongst the signs.Rather than having to depend on abstractions Muslims can defend their faith to themselves with concrete and empirical realities.
The claims in the Quran which are epistemological seem to be based on having eyes and ears and a heart which is not screened but rather open to the truth.
The shackles mentioned in surah Yasin indicate the distorted and twisted nature of the heart and experience of self which is typical of unbelief.
On the other hand, the things like peace in the mosque peace after prayers trust in one’s friends, the beauty of uncluttered life, the good conscience of knowing charity and it’s benefits, the sensation of having a clean mouth after brushing teeth these are all aesthetic and emotional or conscience related phenomenon rather than abstract intellection.
I think it was Pascal who taught of the God of the philosophers being redundant to him after religious experience. Although some of the signs such as peace or beauty and not sooo overwhelming as an intense religious ‘vision’ may be,, they are not pure conceptual logical arguments.
That’s my experience and understanding, we come to no God and the truth is the religion in part through reflecting our experience in a more calm, peaceful, Zen-like manner, rather than needing to devour and assimilate the conceptual inferences of the philosophers.
And experientially in terms of perception of the external world for example the beauty of a forest would be a sign not because of the intricate nature of its design but because of the phenomenological qualities pointing to a higher creator, the aesthetic properties of the natural world indicating as things seen something beyond them.
This is not to say I don’t “get” the abstract arguments, but they generally don’t have the kind of aesthetic consequence that salat does or zikr does.
Often when atheists require evidence for God they are diverted away from every day reality to abstractions, by so called apologetics experts, whereas in the Quran I think we are driven away from abstractions to towards an aesthetic, and conscience related and emotional epistemology which refers back to everyday life. Hsn (beauty and goodness) are often understood aesthetically and in terms of feeling and conscience. Scientists sometimes talk about beautiful arguments and elegant theories, but the primary usage is in the everyday world, thank you sheikh.
ماشاءاللہ
As salaamu alaikum, where in the US can I purchase your book?
Subhanallah
We need translate for Arabic pliz
Is this is the guy who drinked the poison 🗿
Can you please do a debate with mar mari, especially after what has occurred do to the delusional persons responds to when someone argues against islam, make it right and show the propper way.
I believe in Allah. But I always feel that in Islam a woman is nothing less than a prisoner of home. I am making this comment after reading certain fatwas on the internet. Of course I don't know Arabic but this feeling I get is from the society where I reside. So, I humbly request @Asrar Rashid-official to clarify this for me.
This is absolutely false. Women are elevated in status through islam. So much so that Muslims have fought entire battles for the safety of just 1 woman. The reality is that islam transcends all societal flaws, and is the most prosperous and moral a civil society could be. Yet we all know that we don't live in a utopia. There will always be someone to take advantage of the weak & naive. There will always exist predators & prey for as long as life exists on earth. The best case scenario is to be able to protect our families & loved ones from being preyed upon. This is the job of a man because of the natural instinct to protect is ingrained in us the same way a mother is ingrained with a maternal instinct for children. Everything in Islam & its laws are in place in order to guide us to live a civil life in any situation. Examples of women having to cover up is purely in the intrest of the woman and her safety, physically, mentally, reputationally, ect. Imagine a sick person assaulting a someone because they look "easy" or cuz they have seen suggestive pics/videos of them. Imagine creeps cat calling your wife as she walks to the store. Imagine seeing your own mother or sister naked on the internet as a kid. Imagine being embarrassed to be seen with your family. These are all things that Islam protects us from as best as we can. These issues deteriorate families, which in turn deteriorates our society. This is not the fault of a man or woman. But continuing to ignore the the increasing immorality due to the concept of "equality" is just plain foolish and unproductive.
Hi where do you live? Could be cultural
No. Madrasa never have these issues. One or two incidences can not be based to defame madrasa. Sorry we are not agree with you. Madrasa made the muslim strong muslims
You live in a cave in think. Pakistan and india are very bad for this I’m glad he as mentioned this
Shut the hell up bro youre twisting the words. Fear Allah and the judgement day. Refrain yourself from being an imbecìle. Thank you. @faisal_khan57
Some have, for sure, but for many atheists including myself, it’s more of just a logical thing. Becoming aware that religious claims have not met their respective burden of proofs.
It’s only natural to be an atheist
No it isn't natural to be atheist. However, sheikh was referring to a group of individuals who left their religion because of emotional reasons.
@@hamza_hasnat_hbk ironically being an atheist is one of the most natural things one can be
@apersonontheinternet8354 actually you are wrong. There have been multiple studies with children that have proven that humans innately believe in one god.
@@Shoujo_o that’s bizarre since going by logic itself and how our brains fundamentally work, we don’t believe anything when we are born. It’s not innate. Try again 🤷
@apersonontheinternet8354 We're born knowing nothing? Is a baby trained to latch onto their mother's breast? Cry when they are hungry? You're the one not being logical. You can reject it all you want, but the truth and research are out there.
This is totally wrong because you are giving hukum on كل from بعض الاجزاء which is totally wrong. When the hukum can be given on كل from أكثر الأجزاء .so Atheism can never be called an emotional problem . I think shaykh asrar has forgotten the usools as he is doing Concerts with ahle biddah
Wait, are you saying this for real???
Please watch the Video Again but this time with full concentration and without scrolling...
@@sayedali2337 actually he should leave his hatred first
@@hamza_hasnat_hbk oh yeah...
Now I got it why he commented That...
He said 'some'.
Lol. He gave the hukm on the juz not on the kul. I Don't think you were listening.