This is what drew me to watch and study the lectures of Shaykh Asrar. He always has a very clear and rational argument for all topics he discusses. Jazakumullah khair, Shaykh Asrar for this concise explanation.
This statement that Shirk is shirk and does not rely on whether a person is alive or dead!! SubhanAllah! That clears a lot of things! Alhamdulillah! JazakAllahu Khairan Shaikh Asrar
Yes, as an usool that applies consistently and those who claim that you can't ask the dead are consistent with this usool because the 3 conditions for seeking help is the same for both dead and alive, name: 1. Hayy (alive) 2. Haazir (present) 3. Maqdoor alaihi (capacity to act on the request) So, the shirk of those who ask the dead for help does not contradict these usool similar to the one who seeks help from a living person in absentia!! Hope that clears your doubt.
And if, when they had wronged themselves, they had but come unto thee and asked forgiveness of Allah, and asked forgiveness of the messenger, they would have found Allah Forgiving, Merciful. Does this ayah only apply when the Prophet salallahualaihi wasllm was in this world?
@@reflection5057and who made that criteria? The prophet (peace be upon him)? The companions? The tabieen? One of the 4 Sunni imams? Or was it some random guy from Arabia who decided he was going to change centuries worth of Islamic understanding bc he disagreed with it…
@@reflection5057 where is your delil that they are hearing, able to help like providing barakah, rain, child etc.... If you don't have, than you are lying for Allah l, and this is kufur. Acordin with this anology, we can ask to rocks, moon, sun, to provide us believing that thay have power from the God, and this is shirk because Allah made us clear that they have no power. As he made us clear that saints that mushriks adored couldn't hear and couldn't grant anything.
When I listen my dear brother's licture then get more confidence for love our Beloved Rasullah SA (PBUM) From Bangladesh May Allah give him( beloved bro Asrar Rashid) more knowledge
Jazakallah khairan sheikh. Keep up the good work. We need to stand firm against these Wahhabis who are taking over the youth with their extremely limited knowledge but attention seeking videos.
It is related from Malik al-Dar, `Umar's treasurer, that the people suffered a drought GRAVE OF THE PROPHET and said: "O MESSENGER of Allah, ASK FOR RAIN for your Community, for verily they have but perished," after which the Prophet appeared to him in a dream and told him: "Go to `Umar and give him my greeting, then tell him that they will be watered. Tell him: You must be clever, you must be clever!" The man went and told `Umar. The latter said: "O my Lord, I spare no effort except in what escapes my power!" This narration is authenticated by many scholars, such as: 1- Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani says in ("Fath al Bari", 2/495): "وروى ابن أبي شيبة بإسناد صحيح - Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated this with an authentic chain." 2- Ibn Kathir says in ("Al-Bidayah", 7/106): "وهذا إسناد صحيح - this chain is authentic." 3- Al-Qastalani says ("Al-Mawahib", 3374): "وروى ابن أبى شيبة بإسناد صحيح من رواية أبى صالح السمان، عن مالك الدار - Ibn Abi Shaybah has narrated this with an authentic chain." 4- Al-Samhudi says ("Khulasa al-Wafa", 1/417): "ومنه ما رواه البيهقي وابن أبى شيبة بسند صحيح عن مالك الدار - Al-Bayhaqi and Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated this authentically on the authority of Malik Al-Daar." It is also authenticated by: Al-Zarqani, al-Haythami, Ibn 'Allan, and many other Hadith scholars. It was also used by scholars to proof the miracles of the Prophet, such as Bayhaqi.
@@almukhlabi A narrator is generally declared as unknown (majhul) when: a) He only has one student that ever reported from him. b) None of the Hadith masters declared him as reliable or unreliable.
In the case of Malik Ad-Dar, both these factors are non applicable. a) Hafiz Ibn Hajar (rahimahullah) has cited a number of students (4) that have reported from him. Not just one. Therefore Imam Ibn Sa’d (rahimahullah) said: ‘He was known (ma’ruf).’ -The opposite of Majhul! (Al-Isabah, vol.3 pg.484) b) Malik Ad-Dar (rahimahullah) was the treasurer of Sayyiduna ‘Umar (radiyallahu’anhu). This points to his reliability in the eyes of Sayyiduna ‘Umar (radiyallahu’anhu). Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hibban (rahimahullah) has declared him reliable (thiqah). (Kitabuth Thiqat, number: 3719) Imam Abu Ya’la Al-Khalili (rahimahullah) said: ‘He was an elderly Tabi’i, and unanimously accepted as such. The Tabi’un have praised him.’ (Al-Irshad, number: 166)
@@almukhlabi The Musannaf of Ibn Abi Shayba explicitly mentions him to be ‘the treasurer of Sayyidina Umar’, he cannot be MAJHOOL. A) Imam Ibn Sa'ad said: “Malik ad-Dar was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab. He reported traditions from Abu Bakr as-Siddiq radiallahu anha and ‘Umar ibn Al Khattab Radiallahu anha, and Abu Salih Samman reported traditions from him. He was "WELL KNOWN (MAROOF)" Reference: Ibn Sa‘d, at-Tabaqat-ul-kubra Volume 006, Page No. 12, Narrator Number. 1423 B) Ibn Hibban Alayhir rehma has attested to the trustworthiness and credibility of Malik ad-Dar : Imam Ibn Hibban Said: Malik bin ‘Iyad ad-Dar. He has taken traditions from Umar Farooq Radiallahu anha, and Abu Saleh al-Samman, and He was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab. Reference: Kitab uth-Thiqat Volume 005, Page No. 384 C) Imam al-Dhahabi Alayhir rehma said about Malik ad-Dar Radiallahu anha, He (Malik ad-Dar) was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab Radiallahu anha, He has taken traditions from Abu Bakar as-Siddiq Radiallahu anha. Reference:- Tajrid Asma' al-Sahabah, by Imam Dhahabi, Volume 002, Page No. 44].
جزاكم الله خيرا Moreover in the story of (Israa and Mieraj) The prohret Muhammad peace be upon him met all the prophets and talked with them and lead them in the praying. so if they died, then how can he met them
And we have other Hadees as well where Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam saw Musa Alahisalam on Mountain reading talbiya and saw yunus alahisalam on camel reading talbiya reference Sahih Muslim . One hadees stating dat when Imam Hussain got Shaheed on way of Allah in karbala. At that moment Hazrat Salma radiallahu anha saw a dream in which Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam came and said I am coming from Karbala . We also have same dream to Hazrat e Ibn e Abbas radiallahu anhu. Reference: Tirmizi , Hakim al mustadrak. Means Allah has given power to dem to also visit dunya .
MashaAllah nice explanation but my Question is what if we ask something direct to Rasool’Allah salallahu alahiwasallam like Abu huraira RA asked for memory and Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam granted him by just putting his hand in air as if he's collecting something and provided to Abu hurayra . Another place Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam gave 1500 sahaba water by his finger .. so if he has Powers and we ask him all this stuffs then dis is dua right??? Or just asking (imdad)
If there was Ijtihad in Qat3iyyat then we would need to find excuses for Yahud and Nasara too. Also, he did Qiyas ma3 lFariq - he compared Ribba which is lmaqtu3 3ind l-Umma 3la 7urmatih with Tawassul - which is at most Mukhtalaf Fihi bayn l-Firaq, l-Mandub 3ind Ahl l-Sunnah.
Salaam, what if I had a dream where we didn’t see Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ face but believed it was him and he asked me what I wanted? Is there any way to know if it was actually him ﷺ?
In essence, tawassul (asking through a pious person) and istightha (asking for help) both are not dua to someone else. Dua is praying to Allah knowing He is the only Helper and acceptor of duas. Specifically istightha is done knowing the deceased pious person can hear your needs and make dua for you or find help for you through the means Allah has provided for them. And the Rasul AlayhisSalam is alive, pure, and aware in his blessed resting place; then what is the difference from returning to your mother when you're in worried and returning to the best of creation, the Rahmah to all worlds, when you are in need?
@@yusufshaikh4942 When you say alive it does not mean alive in the same sense as the dunya and you would say that is obvious. When anyone dies, they go to Al-Barzakh at that is a barrier between this world and the next as Allah mentions in the Quran. Allah also mentions in the Quran: “Indeed, you (O Prophet) are to die, and indeed, they are to die.” (39:30) So when you say they are alive it is important to distinguish life in what sense. And if you don’t affirm that then how do you make sense of Quran 39:30? The Messenger ﷺ cannot hear your duas. If he could, you would’ve seen the greatest Sahaaba in many mutawaatir hadith going to his grave seeking help not just 1 or 2 narrations like the story of Malik ad darr which the authenticity has been debated. This is what some of the scholars had to say about the authenticity of the story of Malik Darr: ’Abbas said from Yahya (ibn Ma’in): “weak.” Mutin narrated from Yahya: “There is no good from him.” Abu Dawud said: “He is nothing (Laysa bi shayin).” Abu Hatim said: “Matruk (abandoned).” Ibn Hibban said: “Accused of being a Zindiq (heretic).” Ibn ‘Adi: “And Sayf would fabricate hadith and he was accused of being a Zindiq (heretic).” (“Mizan Al-I’tidal” v 2 p 256) “Sayf is the author of the book “Al-Futuh” and he is weak by agreement” (“Faydh Al-Bari”, chapter time of Fajr v 2 p 136) “Sayf ibn Umar accused of being a Zindiq and fabricating Hadith.” (“Tanzih Ash-Shari’ah Al-Marfu’ah” of Abul Hasan ‘ali ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Araq Al-Kattani v 1 p 66, first edition Beirut Lebanon) “Sayf is Matruk, he was accused of fabricating and being a Zindiq. Ibn ‘Adi said: The majority of his Hadith are Munkar” (“Al-Alali Al-Masnu’ah” of As-Suyuti v 1 p 157) ”Sayf ibn Umar was reporting fabrications from trustworthy people and he was fabricating Hadith.” (“Kitabul Al-Majruhin” of ibn Hibban v 1 p 345 and p 346) “Sayf ibn ‘Umar Matruk by agreement and ibn Hibban said: he was reporting fabrications” (“Al-Mughni” of Az-Zahabi v1 p 292, “Tahzib At-Tahzib” v 4 p 295)
@@user-hc1fm9vh8t @H when I say alive I mean living a life grater than this one. As we all know the various aayaat and ahadeeth regarding the passing of a shaheed, "Say they are not dead." This is the understanding of the scholars of the past and present. He is Hayaatun, Tabeebun, Fi Qabrih. He is living and we are the ones who haven't lived yet. It's the cure on this ummah that Scholars such as Ibn baaz and Uthaymeen went back at nit picking on the chains of narrations, spreading their doubts in the name of purity and revivalism. They are disconnected from the consensus of the ummah and have led countless astray.
ASLM...ya Sheigh excellent naseeha Alhamdulillah...Sheigh can a Muslim work in a bank...riba base bank.....and a Muslim becomes a debt collector???...can we as muslims eat from them??
If making dua🤲 by waseela of your good deeds, Allah's names etc. (as per authentic hadith) is permissible then how can using a person for that waseela be Shirk.⚰️👿🔥🔥🔥...having said that making dua to the Prophet, for worldly needs (as you would make to Allah e.g. Allah give me a wife, a house, a car etc.) is IMO.🤷🏿♂️
People keep making claims they are following the schools of thought but never quote what they actually say. Both parties need to back their claims up instead of just making a claim. If all 4 schools say it's ok... Prove it and vice versa
ثُمَّ يَرْجِعُ إلَى مَوْقِفِهِ الْأَوَّلِ قُبَالَةَ وَجْهِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَيَتَوَسَّلُ بِهِ فِي حَقِّ نَفْسِهِ وَيَسْتَشْفِعُ بِهِ إلَى رَبِّهِ سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى وَمِنْ أَحْسَنِ مَا يَقُولُ مَا حَكَاهُ الْمَاوَرْدِيُّ وَالْقَاضِي أَبُو الطَّيِّبِ وَسَائِرُ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ الْعُتْبِيِّ مُسْتَحْسِنِينَ لَهُ قَالَ (كُنْت جَالِسًا عِنْدَ قَبْرِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَجَاءَ أَعْرَابِيٌّ فَقَالَ السَّلَامُ عَلَيْك يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ سَمِعْت اللَّهَ يَقُولُ (وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذْ ظَلَمُوا أَنْفُسَهُمْ جَاءُوكَ فَاسْتَغْفَرُوا اللَّهَ وَاسْتَغْفَرَ لهم الرسول لوجدوا الله توابا رحيما) وَقَدْ جِئْتُك مُسْتَغْفِرًا مِنْ ذَنْبِي مُسْتَشْفِعًا بِك إلَى رَبِّي ثُمَّ أَنْشَأَ يَقُولُ ....) From the book of Almajmoo' by the Great Esteemed Scholar, Al Imaam Al Nawawi may Allah ta'ala have mercy upon him and all of the Islamic scholars. Clearly stating of making Tawassul to the Messenger of Allah ta'ala when visiting his grave. If Imaam Al Nawawi and all of the Shafi scholars don't know the difference between Tawhiid and Shirk, then am guessing The Wahabis know it
حَدَّثَنَا القاضي أبو عبد الله محمد بن عبد الرحمن الْأَشْعَرِيُّ وَأَبُو الْقَاسِمِ أَحْمَدُ بن بَقِيٍّ الْحَاكِمُ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ فيما أجازونيه قالو أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ أَحْمَدُ بن عُمَرَ بن دِلْهَاثٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْحَسَنِ عَلِيُّ بن فِهْرٍ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرٍ مُحَمَّدُ بن أَحْمَدَ بن الفَرَجِ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْحَسَنِ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بن المُنْتَابِ حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بن إِسْحَاقَ بن أَبِي إِسْرَائِيلَ حَدَّثَنَا ابن حميد قال ناظرا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنينَ مَالِكًا فِي مَسْجِدِ رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال لَهُ مَالِكٌ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ لَا تَرْفَعْ صَوْتَكَ فِي هَذَا المَسْجِدِ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى أَدَّبَ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (لا تَرْفَعُوا أَصْوَاتَكُمْ فَوْقَ صَوْتِ النبي) الآيَةَ، وَمَدَحَ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَغُضُّونَ أَصْوَاتَهُمْ عِنْدَ رسول الله) الآيَةَ، وَذَمَّ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُنَادُونَكَ) الآيَةَ وَإِنَّ حُرْمَتَهُ مَيتًا كَحُرْمَتِهِ حَيًّا فَاسْتَكَانَ لَهَا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ وَقَالَ يَا أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ أَسْتَقْبِلُ الْقِبْلَةَ وَأَدْعُو أَمْ أَسْتَقْبِلُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ؟ فَقَالَ وَلم تَصْرفْ وَجْهَكَ عَنْهُ وَهُوَ وَسِيلَتُكَ وَوَسِيلَةُ أَبِيكَ آدَمَ عيه السَّلَامُ إِلَى اللَّهِ تَعَالَى يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ؟ بَلِ اسْتَقْبِلْهُ واسْتَشْفِعْ بِهِ فَيُشَفِّعهُ اللَّهُ قَالَ اللَّهُ تعالى (وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذْ ظلموا أنفسهم) From the book of Alshifaa by the Great Maliki scholar Al Qaadi iyaad. Mentioning Imam Malim RA was asked should I face the Qiblah or the Messenger PBUH, he replied "why would you turn away from him when he is your intermediate and the intermediate of your father Adam alayhi salaam to your Lord? Face him and ask for his intercession... Imaam ibn Hajar in Aljawhar almunnadam, and alzarqaani in Al mawaahib authenticated this story. Although the wahabi's say, it's a lie against imaam maalik. Regardless of the chain, this is the position of these great Maliki Scholars who know more of their mad-hab then the wahabis
This is such a serious issue and people are making bold claims. I don’t even know what to believe. As far as I’ve ever known dua is a form of worship just like wudu,salat,etc. and what about these: “Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die” [al-Zumar 39:30] “Muhammad is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you then turn back on your heels (as disbelievers)?” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:144] Genuine question if it’s apparently okay to invoke the messenger saw why don’t we make dua to Musa, nuh,isa etc. ? Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) said, in his speech after the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had died, “Whoever used to worship Muhammad, Muhammad has died, but whoever used to worship Allaah, Allaah is Alive and will never die.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari). This all seems so dodgy and I don’t know what to think. Involving the saint, imo has always been some weird thing the Christian’s do.
Ijtihad means, finding the evidence or deriving the law(sharia) directly from the Qur'an and Hadiths. In the classical Sunni Islam (Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah) there are four mujtahid(someone who does ijtihad) whom the entire ummah have followed since the early years of Islam, Imam Numan Ibn Thabit Abu Hanifa, Imam Muhammad Ibn Idrees Al Shaf'i, Imam Malik Ibn Anas Al Madani, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal(may Allah have mercy on all of them). Modern day, Salafiyya-Wahabi Movement believes that Ijtihad is compulsory on all Muslims.
If it is kufr to do ijtihad in Tawhid. Are the salafis not then kuffar for having, according to you, a misunderstanding of Tawhid, since it is something that is known by necessity?
A question how about being *far away* from the grave of Rasulullah like a different country. Would it be permissible to make tawassul through Rasulullah saying 'Ya Rasul-Allah ask Allah rain for us'? However making dua directly *to* Rasulullah like you mentioned is *impermissible.* Listen at minute 4:43
I think what the shaykh meant here by dua, is when you ask someone for help and believing they are independently able to help you. When a person asks rasulullah SAW for something, they don't believe they have independent power to help them with that situation, but they ask rasulullah SAW to ask Allah SWT. I think this is his point. Yes you can ask rasulullah SAW something, but that doesn't make it a dua. A dua is done for someone who can independently grant you your wish. Im not 100% sure though but I think this is what he means.
Why dont these people when they claim something from Hadith and dont give proper references and narrating hadiths which are daif and claim they are sahih cause some claimed it to be sahih The Hadith bilal about rain that tooo if studied properly will realise that not the case what this guys is implying cause Umar رضي الله عنه was there in madinah close to the prophet s grave still he called the uncle to invoke Allah for rain This analogies used due to the prophets being alive does it make the prophet All hearing AS-SAMI if this is taken one is associating the prophet of allah with allah if this is not shirk than what is Also read quran az zumar ayah 3 in which allah calls those disbelievers who do action of worship with auliya thinking they are closer to Allah This guys sufi be aware of this guy they ply with words analogies and Mia interpret Hadith which are unclear and don’t talk about the hadiths which are clear
Without you people interjecting your beliefs into things you would have nothing to say. When has any Muslim said the prophet is “All hearing” or do the angels carry these things to him? Please learn the status of the men mentioned, the status of their righteousness, their knowledge and proximity to those closest to the Sahaba. You don’t have the qualifications to go through the grading of Hadith or even recognise or apply the grading of Hadith from a standard of Fiqh not just grading amongst the Muhaditheen then you can speak.
“Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die” [al-Zumar 39:30] The basic principle concerning the dead is that they do not hear the words of the living sons of Adam, because Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “but you cannot make hear those who are in graves” [Faatir 35:22] Allah confirmed that those whom he (the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)) was calling to Islam could not hear, by likening them to the dead. There is nothing in the Quran or in the saheeh Sunnah to indicate that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) can hear every du’aa’ or call from human beings. Rather it is proven that the only thing that reaches him (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the blessings and salaams of those who send blessings and salaams upon him. This was narrated by Abu Dawood, 2041, with a hasan isnaad from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) who said that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “There is no one who sends salaams upon me but Allah will restore to me my soul so that I may return his salaams.” This does not mean that he hears the words of the one who sends salaams. Rather it is possible that he comes to know of those salaams when the angels convey that to him.
@@justahuman00 here’s the full ayah: Nor are the dead and the living equal. Indeed, Allah ˹alone˺ makes whoever He wills hear, but you ˹O Prophet˺ can never make those in the graves hear ˹your call˺. How does support your shirky way of thinking or claim? You and the like of you are living a dangerous game. Address the whole refutation rather than one thing, you can’t, neither can your ‘sheikh’.
@@justahuman00 Prophet Muhammad (SAW) cannot hear anything from his ummah aside from the Salam that he returns with the permission of Allah. Asrar Rashid and the likes of him is the reason we have shirk, especially in South East Asia, because of this ‘theory’. Stop this nonsense. Narrated `Umar: I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle." Sahih Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3445 In-book reference : Book 60, Hadith 115
@@justahuman00 This was narrated by Abu Dawood, 2041, with a hasan isnaad from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) who said that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “There is no one who sends salaams upon me but Allah will restore to me my soul so that I may return his salaams.”
@@imranb4985 why address the ayah only? Because addressing it undermines your argument since Allāh said: He makes whoever he wills hear. The latter part is talking about Prophet PBUH's inability to make things happen including hearing from the grave, if Allah wills it can happen just like everything in the universe. About Umar RA's hadith, who is asserting divinity to prophet PBUH? Epistemology of Prophet PBUH's knowledge is the same whether he PBUH is alive or not, i.e through Allāh. I don't think you understand what shirk is. Being alive or dead is not a necessary criteria of shirk. The fact that Asrar Rashid addressed those points very well and all that you did was just misquote a verse (whether deliberately or not) only for the verse (complete) itself to refute your argument. Salam.
Doesn’t matter what school of thought condones it, it’s wrong. As eloquent and emotional that you want to be about the issue, doesn’t make it correct. We cannot ask aside from Allah, anyone or anything. Don’t let this matter be your downfall on the day of judgment people.
Im a Sunni Muslim but Im closer to Deobandi than Barelwi. We don’t make du’a to anyone except Allah. I have seen Barelwis lift their hands as though they are making du’a to Allah but then they start invoking Sayyidina Nabi alaihis salam instead. It sent shivers down my spine to see such open shirk. That is not tawassul. Tawassul is to say “Ya Allah accept my prayer by virtue of my belief and love for Rasool Allah”
May Allah take you out of jahaalat before you turn into a fully blown Abu Jahl. Learn the Maqam of Muhammad, the most praised one. Peace and blessings be upon him. Edit: upon checking his channel, the guy is an imposter. He believes ahmadis are a sect and he also believes Allah talks to him... 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
You must also think Beggars are Mushriks too because they raise their hands to ask? Raising hands is not an act of worship, a Sajda is. But if you do claim raising hands is then you must know as a Sunni Muslim that the qibla of the hands is the sky.
Deobandis firstly allow and recommend seeking intercession at the grave of the prophet saw. They prevented it from far amongst masses because they felt the correct aqeedah might be corrupted. Otherwise it is easy to find Ashraf ali thanvi and other scholars making istighatha and recommending it to more learned audiences. The issue you have is when the seeking of intercession starts to outwardly resemble our dua, and the deobandis did not consider this as shirk, but said it may give the impression of it, hence advising caution. I think some of the modern followers and imams of masjids didn't realise this nuanced position and started claiming it is shirk
Prophet Muhammad (SAW) cannot hear anything from his ummah aside from the Salam that he returns with the permission of Allah. Asrar Rashid and the likes of him is the reason we have shirk, especially in South East Asia, because of this ‘theory’. Stop this nonsense. Narrated `Umar: I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle." Sahih Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3445 In-book reference : Book 60, Hadith 115
Sheikh please use #hashtags (subjects) in your descriptions to attract more views and to spead your videos so it reaches more people!! And @to people your aiming at! @AsrarRashid #sunni #EndofTime #Muslim #AhleSunnah Etc
![DEBATE: Can You Make Du'a To The Prophet ﷺ After His Death? [PART 2]](/img/n.gif)
This is what drew me to watch and study the lectures of Shaykh Asrar. He always has a very clear and rational argument for all topics he discusses. Jazakumullah khair, Shaykh Asrar for this concise explanation.
Lion of Islam!!!
This statement that Shirk is shirk and does not rely on whether a person is alive or dead!! SubhanAllah! That clears a lot of things! Alhamdulillah! JazakAllahu Khairan Shaikh Asrar
Yes, as an usool that applies consistently and those who claim that you can't ask the dead are consistent with this usool because the 3 conditions for seeking help is the same for both dead and alive, name:
1. Hayy (alive)
2. Haazir (present)
3. Maqdoor alaihi (capacity to act on the request)
So, the shirk of those who ask the dead for help does not contradict these usool similar to the one who seeks help from a living person in absentia!!
Hope that clears your doubt.
And if, when they had wronged themselves, they had but come unto thee and asked forgiveness of Allah, and asked forgiveness of the messenger, they would have found Allah Forgiving, Merciful.
Does this ayah only apply when the Prophet salallahualaihi wasllm was in this world?
@@reflection5057and who made that criteria? The prophet (peace be upon him)? The companions? The tabieen? One of the 4 Sunni imams? Or was it some random guy from Arabia who decided he was going to change centuries worth of Islamic understanding bc he disagreed with it…
@@reflection5057answer the brother’s questions. From where did u get this?!
@@reflection5057 where is your delil that they are hearing, able to help like providing barakah, rain, child etc.... If you don't have, than you are lying for Allah l, and this is kufur. Acordin with this anology, we can ask to rocks, moon, sun, to provide us believing that thay have power from the God, and this is shirk because Allah made us clear that they have no power. As he made us clear that saints that mushriks adored couldn't hear and couldn't grant anything.
Sheiykh lots of prayers for you from Makkah shareef after Umrah❤
😌 mashallah, And Jazakallah you are only one who is defending ahlu sunnah in English speaking world
ua-cam.com/video/gGlhJz2rSiE/v-deo.html
Shadee Elmasry of Safina Society
When I listen my dear brother's licture then get more confidence for love our Beloved Rasullah SA (PBUM)
From Bangladesh
May Allah give him( beloved bro Asrar Rashid) more knowledge
Sayyadi Rasoolullah* Sallallahu Alayhe Wasallam. Brother, always write Durood Shareef in full.
from bangladesh as well.
An absolute amazing reference for knowledge AlhumdULILLAH JazakALLAH
mashallah so beautiful! 👏👏👏👏 Ya Rasoorullah sallallahu alaihi wasallam ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Alhamdulillah ! Great and Needed Reply 👍
Thanks to guide and protect our Sunni Akidha.
Jazak Allah Khair Shaykh... I love your videos
مَاشَآءَاللّهُ clear concise response
اَللّٰھُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰی مُحَمَّدٍ وَّعَلٰٓی اٰلِ مُحَمَّدٍ کَمَا صَلَّیْتَ عَلٰٓی اِبْرَاھِیْمَ وَعَلٰٓی اٰلِ اِبْرَاھِیْمَ اِنَّکَ حَمِیْدٌ مَّجِیْدٌ اَللّٰھُمَّ بَارِکْ عَلٰی مُحَمَّدٍ وَّعَلٰٓی اٰلِ مُحَمَّدٍ کَمَا بَارَکْتَ عَلٰٓی اِبْرَاھِیْمَ وَعَلٰٓی اٰلِ اِبْرَاھِیْمَ اِنَّکَ حَمِیْدٌ مَّجِیْدٌ
Bless you sheikh, amazing response
Jazak Allah khairan ya sheikh
Ma sha Allah SubhanAllah, Sallalaho alayhi wa ala alihi wasalam
May Allah bless you sheikh
I had this same issue with one of the imam in local masjidmade such a dua. Thanks for clarification 👍
مَا شَاءَ ٱللَّٰهُ
Subhan'Allah!
ایلسنت کے دور حاضر کے بہترین محققین۔ شیخ اسرار رشید اور علامہ راشد محمود رضوی صاحب
ua-cam.com/video/gGlhJz2rSiE/v-deo.html
Rashid Mahmood rizvi? Kabhi dekha nhi
@@the_phen0m639
Alhamdulillah bohat ache se defend karte hai, dalail se baat karte hain, mufti rashid mahmood razvi search kijiye
May ٱللَّٰه سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى bless our SHEKIH our lion 🦁
آمیـــــــــــــن یارب العالمین
سُبْحَانَ الله
Jazakallah khairan sheikh. Keep up the good work. We need to stand firm against these Wahhabis who are taking over the youth with their extremely limited knowledge but attention seeking videos.
Maa shaa Allah
ماشاءالله يا سيدي
May Allah bless you with more beneficial knowledge and aafiyah...
Jazakallah sheikh
ماشاء الله
Great work 👍
Allah o Akbar
Simple and Powerful ❤
Mashaa Allah 👊🏻
الحمد لله!!!
may allah give you long life
Indeed
Mashallah
ﷺ
Most engaging response. Although an in depth reply would also be beneficial
ua-cam.com/video/gGlhJz2rSiE/v-deo.html
Watch mubeen raza video on it he explains it very well
There is a 3hr 44min from shaykh asrar that goes in depth about it
Mashallah ❤️
SubhanAllah
Looking forward to a longer explanation on the matter, inshAllah
ua-cam.com/video/gGlhJz2rSiE/v-deo.html
Shaykh Asrar Rashid the lion defender of ahle sunnah wal jamah may Allah swt protect you against evil and increase you in knowledge shaykh❤❤
Aameen yarabbal alameen🤲
It is related from Malik al-Dar, `Umar's treasurer, that the people suffered a drought GRAVE OF THE PROPHET and said: "O MESSENGER of Allah, ASK FOR RAIN for your Community, for verily they have but perished," after which the Prophet appeared to him in a dream and told him: "Go to `Umar and give him my greeting, then tell him that they will be watered. Tell him: You must be clever, you must be clever!" The man went and told `Umar. The latter said: "O my Lord, I spare no effort except in what escapes my power!"
This narration is authenticated by many scholars, such as:
1- Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani says in ("Fath al Bari", 2/495):
"وروى ابن أبي شيبة بإسناد صحيح - Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated this with an authentic chain."
2- Ibn Kathir says in ("Al-Bidayah", 7/106):
"وهذا إسناد صحيح - this chain is authentic."
3- Al-Qastalani says ("Al-Mawahib", 3374):
"وروى ابن أبى شيبة بإسناد صحيح من رواية أبى صالح السمان، عن مالك الدار - Ibn Abi Shaybah has narrated this with an authentic chain."
4- Al-Samhudi says ("Khulasa al-Wafa", 1/417):
"ومنه ما رواه البيهقي وابن أبى شيبة بسند صحيح عن مالك الدار - Al-Bayhaqi and Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated this authentically on the authority of Malik Al-Daar."
It is also authenticated by: Al-Zarqani, al-Haythami, Ibn 'Allan, and many other Hadith scholars.
It was also used by scholars to proof the miracles of the Prophet, such as Bayhaqi.
Malik Al-Dar is Majhool.
@@almukhlabi A narrator is generally declared as unknown (majhul) when:
a) He only has one student that ever reported from him.
b) None of the Hadith masters declared him as reliable or unreliable.
In the case of Malik Ad-Dar, both these factors are non applicable.
a) Hafiz Ibn Hajar (rahimahullah) has cited a number of students (4) that have reported from him. Not just one.
Therefore Imam Ibn Sa’d (rahimahullah) said: ‘He was known (ma’ruf).’ -The opposite of Majhul!
(Al-Isabah, vol.3 pg.484)
b) Malik Ad-Dar (rahimahullah) was the treasurer of Sayyiduna ‘Umar (radiyallahu’anhu). This points to his reliability in the eyes of Sayyiduna ‘Umar (radiyallahu’anhu).
Furthermore, Imam Ibn Hibban (rahimahullah) has declared him reliable (thiqah).
(Kitabuth Thiqat, number: 3719)
Imam Abu Ya’la Al-Khalili (rahimahullah) said: ‘He was an elderly Tabi’i, and unanimously accepted as such. The Tabi’un have praised him.’
(Al-Irshad, number: 166)
@@fifafreebies8941 the owner of the channel deleted my comments. Shows you how much truth they’re upon. 😅
@@almukhlabi The Musannaf of Ibn Abi Shayba explicitly mentions him to be ‘the treasurer of Sayyidina Umar’, he cannot be MAJHOOL.
A) Imam Ibn Sa'ad said: “Malik ad-Dar was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab. He reported traditions from Abu Bakr as-Siddiq radiallahu anha and ‘Umar ibn Al Khattab Radiallahu anha, and Abu Salih Samman reported traditions from him. He was "WELL KNOWN (MAROOF)"
Reference: Ibn Sa‘d, at-Tabaqat-ul-kubra Volume 006, Page No. 12, Narrator Number. 1423
B) Ibn Hibban Alayhir rehma has attested to the trustworthiness and credibility of Malik ad-Dar : Imam Ibn Hibban Said: Malik bin ‘Iyad ad-Dar. He has taken traditions from Umar Farooq Radiallahu anha, and Abu Saleh al-Samman, and He was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab.
Reference: Kitab uth-Thiqat Volume 005, Page No. 384
C) Imam al-Dhahabi Alayhir rehma said about Malik ad-Dar Radiallahu anha, He (Malik ad-Dar) was a slave freed by ‘Umar bin al-Khattab Radiallahu anha, He has taken traditions from Abu Bakar as-Siddiq Radiallahu anha.
Reference:- Tajrid Asma' al-Sahabah, by Imam Dhahabi, Volume 002, Page No. 44].
@@fifafreebies8941 My responses keep getting deleted. This isn’t an evidence.
Love From Pakistan
Maa sha Allah
Mashallah
جزاكم الله خيرا
Moreover in the story of (Israa and Mieraj)
The prohret Muhammad peace be upon him met all the prophets and talked with them and lead them in the praying. so if they died, then how can he met them
And we have other Hadees as well where Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam saw Musa Alahisalam on Mountain reading talbiya and saw yunus alahisalam on camel reading talbiya reference Sahih Muslim .
One hadees stating dat when Imam Hussain got Shaheed on way of Allah in karbala. At that moment Hazrat Salma radiallahu anha saw a dream in which Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam came and said I am coming from Karbala . We also have same dream to Hazrat e Ibn e Abbas radiallahu anhu. Reference: Tirmizi , Hakim al mustadrak.
Means Allah has given power to dem to also visit dunya .
@@mehmood6490 can you mention the hadith number?
السلام علیکم و رحمۃ ﷲ وبرکاتہ ❤️
❤
What thobe is that and where can i buy it from?
Also watch Mufti Rashid Mahmood rizvi ❤️
Please shaykh upload full lecture
Shaykh , I live in UK but if the bank put interest into my account does that count as Riba .
MashaAllah nice explanation but my Question is what if we ask something direct to Rasool’Allah salallahu alahiwasallam like Abu huraira RA asked for memory and Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam granted him by just putting his hand in air as if he's collecting something and provided to Abu hurayra . Another place Nabi salallahu alahiwasallam gave 1500 sahaba water by his finger .. so if he has Powers and we ask him all this stuffs then dis is dua right??? Or just asking (imdad)
not dua. It will be istighatha.
💯
👍🏾❤️
If there was Ijtihad in Qat3iyyat then we would need to find excuses for Yahud and Nasara too.
Also, he did Qiyas ma3 lFariq - he compared Ribba which is lmaqtu3 3ind l-Umma 3la 7urmatih with Tawassul - which is at most Mukhtalaf Fihi bayn l-Firaq, l-Mandub 3ind Ahl l-Sunnah.
U used arabic words to justify ur mental gymnastic.
that is terrible logic. they are not muslims
Salaam, what if I had a dream where we didn’t see Prophet Muhammad’s ﷺ face but believed it was him and he asked me what I wanted? Is there any way to know if it was actually him ﷺ?
👍
Please explain difference between dua and asking for help such as:
1. Yaa Rasool Allah ﷺ Unzur Haalana...
2. Yaa Ali Madad
3. Yaa Ghaus Al Madad
In essence, tawassul (asking through a pious person) and istightha (asking for help) both are not dua to someone else. Dua is praying to Allah knowing He is the only Helper and acceptor of duas.
Specifically istightha is done knowing the deceased pious person can hear your needs and make dua for you or find help for you through the means Allah has provided for them. And the Rasul AlayhisSalam is alive, pure, and aware in his blessed resting place; then what is the difference from returning to your mother when you're in worried and returning to the best of creation, the Rahmah to all worlds, when you are in need?
@@yusufshaikh4942 jazakallahu khairan
@@yusufshaikh4942 When you say alive it does not mean alive in the same sense as the dunya and you would say that is obvious. When anyone dies, they go to Al-Barzakh at that is a barrier between this world and the next as Allah mentions in the Quran. Allah also mentions in the Quran: “Indeed, you (O Prophet) are to die, and indeed, they are to die.” (39:30)
So when you say they are alive it is important to distinguish life in what sense. And if you don’t affirm that then how do you make sense of Quran 39:30?
The Messenger ﷺ cannot hear your duas. If he could, you would’ve seen the greatest Sahaaba in many mutawaatir hadith going to his grave seeking help not just 1 or 2 narrations like the story of Malik ad darr which the authenticity has been debated. This is what some of the scholars had to say about the authenticity of the story of Malik Darr:
’Abbas said from Yahya (ibn Ma’in): “weak.” Mutin narrated from Yahya: “There is no good from him.” Abu Dawud said: “He is nothing (Laysa bi shayin).” Abu Hatim said: “Matruk (abandoned).” Ibn Hibban said: “Accused of being a Zindiq (heretic).” Ibn ‘Adi: “And Sayf would fabricate hadith and he was accused of being a Zindiq (heretic).” (“Mizan Al-I’tidal” v 2 p 256)
“Sayf is the author of the book “Al-Futuh” and he is weak by agreement” (“Faydh Al-Bari”, chapter time of Fajr v 2 p 136)
“Sayf ibn Umar accused of being a Zindiq and fabricating Hadith.” (“Tanzih Ash-Shari’ah Al-Marfu’ah” of Abul Hasan ‘ali ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Araq Al-Kattani v 1 p 66, first edition Beirut Lebanon)
“Sayf is Matruk, he was accused of fabricating and being a Zindiq. Ibn ‘Adi said: The majority of his Hadith are Munkar” (“Al-Alali Al-Masnu’ah” of As-Suyuti v 1 p 157)
”Sayf ibn Umar was reporting fabrications from trustworthy people and he was fabricating Hadith.” (“Kitabul Al-Majruhin” of ibn Hibban v 1 p 345 and p 346)
“Sayf ibn ‘Umar Matruk by agreement and ibn Hibban said: he was reporting fabrications” (“Al-Mughni” of Az-Zahabi v1 p 292, “Tahzib At-Tahzib” v 4 p 295)
@@user-hc1fm9vh8t @H when I say alive I mean living a life grater than this one. As we all know the various aayaat and ahadeeth regarding the passing of a shaheed, "Say they are not dead."
This is the understanding of the scholars of the past and present. He is Hayaatun, Tabeebun, Fi Qabrih. He is living and we are the ones who haven't lived yet.
It's the cure on this ummah that Scholars such as Ibn baaz and Uthaymeen went back at nit picking on the chains of narrations, spreading their doubts in the name of purity and revivalism. They are disconnected from the consensus of the ummah and have led countless astray.
ua-cam.com/video/gGlhJz2rSiE/v-deo.html
Please give references for the quoted Ahadeeth so that we can cross check it
Which school of thought do you follow with regards to fiqh..?
I believe he follows hanafi school, but all 4 are legit and in unity with one another
How do we actually make tawassul, what is the etiquette we are meant to follow when doing it. Please help 🙏🏽
U should watch his other one hour video
@@Yo-mu4ru what is the title or could you put the link please?
In the middle of the vid I can’t remember what minute he says a dua that u can say and that is said in a Hadith by the sahaba
ASLM...ya Sheigh excellent naseeha Alhamdulillah...Sheigh can a Muslim work in a bank...riba base bank.....and a Muslim becomes a debt collector???...can we as muslims eat from them??
🎉🎉❤❤
When some Muslims go to graves and say oh so and so madad, what are they asking for? Their dua to Allah? Their direct help in something?
u shouldnt ask
If making dua🤲 by waseela of your good deeds, Allah's names etc. (as per authentic hadith) is permissible then how can using a person for that waseela be Shirk.⚰️👿🔥🔥🔥...having said that making dua to the Prophet, for worldly needs (as you would make to Allah e.g. Allah give me a wife, a house, a car etc.) is IMO.🤷🏿♂️
Lion is back
People keep making claims they are following the schools of thought but never quote what they actually say. Both parties need to back their claims up instead of just making a claim.
If all 4 schools say it's ok... Prove it and vice versa
Bro asrar rashid got all these evidences from hadiths
It is reported that all 4 imams did that. Go search it up
ثُمَّ يَرْجِعُ إلَى مَوْقِفِهِ الْأَوَّلِ قُبَالَةَ وَجْهِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَيَتَوَسَّلُ بِهِ فِي حَقِّ نَفْسِهِ وَيَسْتَشْفِعُ بِهِ إلَى رَبِّهِ سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى وَمِنْ أَحْسَنِ مَا يَقُولُ مَا حَكَاهُ الْمَاوَرْدِيُّ وَالْقَاضِي أَبُو الطَّيِّبِ وَسَائِرُ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ الْعُتْبِيِّ مُسْتَحْسِنِينَ لَهُ قَالَ (كُنْت جَالِسًا عِنْدَ قَبْرِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَجَاءَ أَعْرَابِيٌّ فَقَالَ السَّلَامُ عَلَيْك يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ سَمِعْت اللَّهَ يَقُولُ (وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذْ ظَلَمُوا أَنْفُسَهُمْ جَاءُوكَ فَاسْتَغْفَرُوا اللَّهَ وَاسْتَغْفَرَ لهم الرسول لوجدوا الله توابا رحيما) وَقَدْ جِئْتُك مُسْتَغْفِرًا مِنْ ذَنْبِي
مُسْتَشْفِعًا بِك إلَى رَبِّي ثُمَّ أَنْشَأَ يَقُولُ ....)
From the book of Almajmoo' by the Great Esteemed Scholar, Al Imaam Al Nawawi may Allah ta'ala have mercy upon him and all of the Islamic scholars.
Clearly stating of making Tawassul to the Messenger of Allah ta'ala when visiting his grave.
If Imaam Al Nawawi and all of the Shafi scholars don't know the difference between Tawhiid and Shirk, then am guessing The Wahabis know it
حَدَّثَنَا القاضي أبو عبد الله محمد بن عبد الرحمن الْأَشْعَرِيُّ وَأَبُو الْقَاسِمِ أَحْمَدُ بن بَقِيٍّ الْحَاكِمُ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ فيما أجازونيه قالو أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ أَحْمَدُ بن عُمَرَ بن دِلْهَاثٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْحَسَنِ عَلِيُّ بن فِهْرٍ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرٍ مُحَمَّدُ بن أَحْمَدَ بن الفَرَجِ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْحَسَنِ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بن المُنْتَابِ حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بن إِسْحَاقَ بن أَبِي إِسْرَائِيلَ حَدَّثَنَا ابن
حميد قال ناظرا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنينَ مَالِكًا فِي مَسْجِدِ رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال لَهُ مَالِكٌ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ لَا تَرْفَعْ صَوْتَكَ فِي هَذَا المَسْجِدِ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى أَدَّبَ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (لا تَرْفَعُوا أَصْوَاتَكُمْ فَوْقَ صَوْتِ النبي) الآيَةَ، وَمَدَحَ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَغُضُّونَ أَصْوَاتَهُمْ عِنْدَ رسول الله) الآيَةَ، وَذَمَّ قَوْمًا فَقَالَ (إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُنَادُونَكَ) الآيَةَ وَإِنَّ حُرْمَتَهُ مَيتًا كَحُرْمَتِهِ حَيًّا فَاسْتَكَانَ لَهَا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ وَقَالَ يَا أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ أَسْتَقْبِلُ الْقِبْلَةَ وَأَدْعُو أَمْ أَسْتَقْبِلُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ؟ فَقَالَ وَلم تَصْرفْ وَجْهَكَ عَنْهُ وَهُوَ وَسِيلَتُكَ وَوَسِيلَةُ أَبِيكَ آدَمَ عيه السَّلَامُ إِلَى اللَّهِ تَعَالَى يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ؟ بَلِ اسْتَقْبِلْهُ واسْتَشْفِعْ بِهِ فَيُشَفِّعهُ اللَّهُ قَالَ اللَّهُ تعالى (وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ إِذْ ظلموا أنفسهم)
From the book of Alshifaa by the Great Maliki scholar Al Qaadi iyaad.
Mentioning Imam Malim RA was asked should I face the Qiblah or the Messenger PBUH, he replied "why would you turn away from him when he is your intermediate and the intermediate of your father Adam alayhi salaam to your Lord? Face him and ask for his intercession...
Imaam ibn Hajar in Aljawhar almunnadam, and alzarqaani in Al mawaahib authenticated this story. Although the wahabi's say, it's a lie against imaam maalik.
Regardless of the chain, this is the position of these great Maliki Scholars who know more of their mad-hab then the wahabis
This is such a serious issue and people are making bold claims. I don’t even know what to believe. As far as I’ve ever known dua is a form of worship just like wudu,salat,etc. and what about these: “Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die” [al-Zumar 39:30]
“Muhammad is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you then turn back on your heels (as disbelievers)?” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:144]
Genuine question if it’s apparently okay to invoke the messenger saw why don’t we make dua to Musa, nuh,isa etc. ?
Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him) said, in his speech after the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had died, “Whoever used to worship Muhammad, Muhammad has died, but whoever used to worship Allaah, Allaah is Alive and will never die.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari).
This all seems so dodgy and I don’t know what to think. Involving the saint, imo has always been some weird thing the Christian’s do.
I have a question. What is ijtihad?
Jzk
Ijtihad means, finding the evidence or deriving the law(sharia) directly from the Qur'an and Hadiths. In the classical Sunni Islam (Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah) there are four mujtahid(someone who does ijtihad) whom the entire ummah have followed since the early years of Islam, Imam Numan Ibn Thabit Abu Hanifa, Imam Muhammad Ibn Idrees Al Shaf'i, Imam Malik Ibn Anas Al Madani, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal(may Allah have mercy on all of them). Modern day, Salafiyya-Wahabi Movement believes that Ijtihad is compulsory on all Muslims.
@Ismail Ali thank you, brother. Their logic gets better each passing day😂
If it is kufr to do ijtihad in Tawhid. Are the salafis not then kuffar for having, according to you, a misunderstanding of Tawhid, since it is something that is known by necessity?
that is wahabi logic. they are stuck in their own bubble they do not notice. they are like protestants
Although I m well educated but couldn't well connect with English.
Please also give Urdu summery as well
A question how about being *far away* from the grave of Rasulullah like a different country. Would it be permissible to make tawassul through Rasulullah saying 'Ya Rasul-Allah ask Allah rain for us'? However making dua directly *to* Rasulullah like you mentioned is *impermissible.* Listen at minute 4:43
@@abuanticringe3861 you should not call fellow believers insulting names
@@abuanticringe3861 no what he’s actually saying is right asrar rashid explains this
@@Yo-mu4ru he is creating doubts
@@abuanticringe3861 calm down brother he is asking
I think what the shaykh meant here by dua, is when you ask someone for help and believing they are independently able to help you. When a person asks rasulullah SAW for something, they don't believe they have independent power to help them with that situation, but they ask rasulullah SAW to ask Allah SWT. I think this is his point. Yes you can ask rasulullah SAW something, but that doesn't make it a dua. A dua is done for someone who can independently grant you your wish. Im not 100% sure though but I think this is what he means.
Why dont these people when they claim something from Hadith and dont give proper references and narrating hadiths which are daif and claim they are sahih cause some claimed it to be sahih
The Hadith bilal about rain that tooo if studied properly will realise that not the case what this guys is implying cause Umar رضي الله عنه was there in madinah close to the prophet s grave still he called the uncle to invoke Allah for rain
This analogies used due to the prophets being alive does it make the prophet All hearing AS-SAMI if this is taken one is associating the prophet of allah with allah if this is not shirk than what is
Also read quran az zumar ayah 3 in which allah calls those disbelievers who do action of worship with auliya thinking they are closer to Allah
This guys sufi be aware of this guy they ply with words analogies and Mia interpret Hadith which are unclear and don’t talk about the hadiths which are clear
Without you people interjecting your beliefs into things you would have nothing to say. When has any Muslim said the prophet is “All hearing” or do the angels carry these things to him?
Please learn the status of the men mentioned, the status of their righteousness, their knowledge and proximity to those closest to the Sahaba. You don’t have the qualifications to go through the grading of Hadith or even recognise or apply the grading of Hadith from a standard of Fiqh not just grading amongst the Muhaditheen then you can speak.
purnoor face
“Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die” [al-Zumar 39:30]
The basic principle concerning the dead is that they do not hear the words of the living sons of Adam, because Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“but you cannot make hear those who are in graves” [Faatir 35:22]
Allah confirmed that those whom he (the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)) was calling to Islam could not hear, by likening them to the dead. There is nothing in the Quran or in the saheeh Sunnah to indicate that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) can hear every du’aa’ or call from human beings. Rather it is proven that the only thing that reaches him (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the blessings and salaams of those who send blessings and salaams upon him. This was narrated by Abu Dawood, 2041, with a hasan isnaad from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) who said that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “There is no one who sends salaams upon me but Allah will restore to me my soul so that I may return his salaams.” This does not mean that he hears the words of the one who sends salaams. Rather it is possible that he comes to know of those salaams when the angels convey that to him.
Why misquote verses of the Qur'an? The part you quoted is after Allāh affirming his ability to make people hear.
@@justahuman00 here’s the full ayah:
Nor are the dead and the living equal. Indeed, Allah ˹alone˺ makes whoever He wills hear, but you ˹O Prophet˺ can never make those in the graves hear ˹your call˺.
How does support your shirky way of thinking or claim? You and the like of you are living a dangerous game. Address the whole refutation rather than one thing, you can’t, neither can your ‘sheikh’.
@@justahuman00 Prophet Muhammad (SAW) cannot hear anything from his ummah aside from the Salam that he returns with the permission of Allah. Asrar Rashid and the likes of him is the reason we have shirk, especially in South East Asia, because of this ‘theory’. Stop this nonsense.
Narrated `Umar:
I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle." Sahih Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3445
In-book reference : Book 60, Hadith 115
@@justahuman00 This was narrated by Abu Dawood, 2041, with a hasan isnaad from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) who said that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “There is no one who sends salaams upon me but Allah will restore to me my soul so that I may return his salaams.”
@@imranb4985 why address the ayah only? Because addressing it undermines your argument since Allāh said: He makes whoever he wills hear.
The latter part is talking about Prophet PBUH's inability to make things happen including hearing from the grave, if Allah wills it can happen just like everything in the universe.
About Umar RA's hadith, who is asserting divinity to prophet PBUH?
Epistemology of Prophet PBUH's knowledge is the same whether he PBUH is alive or not, i.e through Allāh. I don't think you understand what shirk is. Being alive or dead is not a necessary criteria of shirk.
The fact that Asrar Rashid addressed those points very well and all that you did was just misquote a verse (whether deliberately or not) only for the verse (complete) itself to refute your argument.
Salam.
Ya Ali madad ❤
Audhobillah, this is shirk what you’re doing.
Why r u wearing a Sikh cap
By Allah you have no sense
Doesn’t matter what school of thought condones it, it’s wrong. As eloquent and emotional that you want to be about the issue, doesn’t make it correct. We cannot ask aside from Allah, anyone or anything. Don’t let this matter be your downfall on the day of judgment people.
Lol
If a barelvi commits adultery with her own mother and do it so everyone can see it that's a lesser sin than asking RasulUllah ﷺ for help in ghaib
Wobbler 🎉🎉🎉
dumb salafi logic. if its better to salafis to commit zina with their own mother than to curse abu bakr and umar so do it
@@jj-yi1necursing the Sahaba is the practice of the Shia.
Im a Sunni Muslim but Im closer to Deobandi than Barelwi. We don’t make du’a to anyone except Allah. I have seen Barelwis lift their hands as though they are making du’a to Allah but then they start invoking Sayyidina Nabi alaihis salam instead. It sent shivers down my spine to see such open shirk. That is not tawassul. Tawassul is to say “Ya Allah accept my prayer by virtue of my belief and love for Rasool Allah”
May Allah take you out of jahaalat before you turn into a fully blown Abu Jahl. Learn the Maqam of Muhammad, the most praised one. Peace and blessings be upon him.
Edit: upon checking his channel, the guy is an imposter. He believes ahmadis are a sect and he also believes Allah talks to him... 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
Why did ashraf thanwi said that "satan knowledge is proven while that of the prophet isnt" ??
Is it good?
you clearly havent read the dua of sayiduna Uthmaan bin Hunaif
You must also think Beggars are Mushriks too because they raise their hands to ask?
Raising hands is not an act of worship, a Sajda is. But if you do claim raising hands is then you must know as a Sunni Muslim that the qibla of the hands is the sky.
Deobandis firstly allow and recommend seeking intercession at the grave of the prophet saw. They prevented it from far amongst masses because they felt the correct aqeedah might be corrupted. Otherwise it is easy to find Ashraf ali thanvi and other scholars making istighatha and recommending it to more learned audiences.
The issue you have is when the seeking of intercession starts to outwardly resemble our dua, and the deobandis did not consider this as shirk, but said it may give the impression of it, hence advising caution.
I think some of the modern followers and imams of masjids didn't realise this nuanced position and started claiming it is shirk
Prophet Muhammad (SAW) cannot hear anything from his ummah aside from the Salam that he returns with the permission of Allah. Asrar Rashid and the likes of him is the reason we have shirk, especially in South East Asia, because of this ‘theory’. Stop this nonsense.
Narrated `Umar:
I heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle." Sahih Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3445
In-book reference : Book 60, Hadith 115
Sheikh please use #hashtags (subjects) in your descriptions to attract more views and to spead your videos so it reaches more people!! And @to people your aiming at!
@AsrarRashid
#sunni
#EndofTime
#Muslim
#AhleSunnah
Etc
Assalamu alaikum Hazrat i want some permission.... give me your contact
This sheikh is a grave worshipper
Mashallah ❤
Mashallah
❤️
Mashallah
❤
❤️
❤️