These are great data! I'm new at DFS and haven't watched much NBA or MLB. And, I don't have a systematic approach to all the data. Do you have a video somewhere in FB which delineates a particular sequence in the line building data search?
alright..great info amazing info. great strategy..amzing really really getting into the technical stuff. the advice is awesome. for the field amazing. its really good stuff. if you start trying to base your line ups on nba with correlations you will lose money. 99% of players don't enter enough line ups to be profitable in the long term with correlations.. great for punt plays but
Fantasy Labs uses, if I understand correctly, historic correlations. Because of this, when there's a change to a starting lineup, like with Chicago, players are not going to be correlated as they should be (like in the Doug Mcdermott situation). Also, historic correlations are prone more to noise, where this is just theoretical and more accurate.
Out of all the videos I've watch on UA-cam for NBA DFS this was by far the most helpful. Thanks
Loved the video. Gave me some good things to think about!
this is absolutely amazing. thank you man !
Max...you are "Money"...you trade options too? If not, you should! I like how you think outside of the box...great stuff...keep on posting!
These are great data! I'm new at DFS and haven't watched much NBA or MLB. And, I don't have a systematic approach to all the data. Do you have a video somewhere in FB which delineates a particular sequence in the line building data search?
u da man max
alright..great info amazing info. great strategy..amzing really really getting into the technical stuff. the advice is awesome. for the field amazing. its really good stuff. if you start trying to base your line ups on nba with correlations you will lose money. 99% of players don't enter enough line ups to be profitable in the long term with correlations.. great for punt plays but
so start with the value right?
Hi max, do you have an email for business purposes by chance?
Cool video. But how is this any different than the Correlations tab in Fantasy Labs when you click on a player?
Fantasy Labs uses, if I understand correctly, historic correlations. Because of this, when there's a change to a starting lineup, like with Chicago, players are not going to be correlated as they should be (like in the Doug Mcdermott situation). Also, historic correlations are prone more to noise, where this is just theoretical and more accurate.