@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business.
@@kansasrose2909 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.''''
@@olderwiser64 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
What makes these two experts on parenting and cyber bullying? Look how they treat their own families. These are the last two individuals I would go to for assistance.
martinkrukenberg4590 and they dont stop their fanbase, the crazy Sussex Squad from bullying online. I have seen some of the things they wrote and Im convinced they are lunatics
Thank goodness! I’m a nurse and it’s dangerous to listen to them let alone have them talk to children (like in Nigeria) when they have no education, certification or license to be telling anyone anything. I was upset with this segment shame on CBS.
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
I've never before seen somebody talk about the darkest and most hopeless time in her life, whilst looking so gleeful and smug. It's chill inducing. Something is truly wrong with this woman, down to her core.
Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.00
Absolutely hypocritical people, they live a huge Hollywood lifestyle, live in a twelve million dollar mansion but beg others for charitable donations, it doesn’t add up to me, somethings not right.
The money went to the most deserving. That is 'arry and his boss, Obviously the most deserving people on the planet having been oppressed for their whole life,
Diana certainly had her faults but it's really sad to see things like this associated with her just because Harry treads on her legacy so much. There is zero chance that Meghan would have made it past the first date if Diana was still alive and she would be wholly ashamed of the things Harry has done in the last few years, especially him trying to tarnish the future reign of William. Anyone who thinks she would still support Harry after all this is truly delusional.
Wtf are they even talking about? Is this about cyber bullying or drugs? You can’t get rid of social media so they have said absolutely nothing or helpful. 🙄
They are trying to get rid of freedom of speech. SOOOO many people are calling her out for her lies and narcissism, they *H &M* want all the criticism silenced.
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
Because you have personally spoken to "Everyone".....how is "Everyone" doing? How are the kids, work, little league practice? Say hi to "Everyone" the next time you speak! Ask them how it feels to live a purpose driven life, do good for others, and use the relentless media attention to shine a light on important issues that matter to you and society. What do YOU personally do to make this world better for others? Hmmmmmm? Let us know, okay?
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! ...
I can not believe CBS giving any further media coverage to this bully? There are 12 people only last week speaking out on their sufferings with this woman, and you still put this nasty person on your channel, shame on you!!
Name all the people, share your factual sources and evidence of your assertions. You PERSONALLY spoke to these people, you verified their stories? What do you do for work? Is attention to detail, integrity, and honesty required or do you typically b.s. your way through your day?
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
If Meghan talks about helping others, why not help her own father first? The father who raised her. Meghan has abandoned his father since marrying Harry. These are solid facts.
What about helping Harry get over losing his Mummy and get over his phobia of cameras/paps? What about defending her sister-in-law from online bully for her cancer? What about helping the Baka people from torture and abuse? Lots more but these are most obvious.
Yes-- let's talk about the father who took money from a tabloid, was a no show for his daughter's wedding, leaked a private letter and went on tabloid TV to trash her. That father---ok dear, I want you to visit your local library, get a card (because reading is fundamental) check out a book called "Mommy Dearest "and write a 4 page critical analysis of abusive parenting practices and how these can be avoided. Go ahead, we will wait with bated breath for you to share more of your deeply insightful commentary!! 😊
The WORST part of this is that Meghan takes the attention off of these poor suffering parents to get sympathy for herself. But no one even realizes this. Ugh.
She needs to be investigated by the California Labor Commissioner's Office. Enough is enough! How many employees is this? Close to 30 by now. They suffer under the abuse.. “Harassment becomes unlawful where 1) enduring the offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment, or 2) the conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a work environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive.”
The Hollywood Reporter has TWELVE sources who had worked for the Sussexes for their bombshell article revealing staff are "terrified" of Meghan Markle and refer to her as the "dictator in high heels". She bullies her staff until they can't take it anymore....
The former employees are terrified because they have bills to pay and don’t want to be blacklisted or blackballed so they put up with her rubbish. She threatens that she has contacts with the most powerful people Oprah, WME and Tyler Perry who will blacklist and blackball them.
@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business. ,,,,
@@kansasrose2909 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.'
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time. ''
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
What's this? We already know that backstory of the chaos that went on behind the scenes of this interview. Could it be that Markle needs some good propaganda to quiet the Hollywood Reporter story?? The stories of her being a terrible boss and a bully are not going to go away. Just wait until the "hysterectomy at 28" truth comes out.
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;;;;;;;;
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.000
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
What a coincidence CBS dropped this extended interview when Harry is in NYC. Megan must have called in some favors. She can’t stay out of the spotlight for 1 minute. Did she even watch this interview it’s terrible.
@@gracehope7 It is soo sooo sad. Harry and his brother led Heads Together which encourages people to have important conversations about mental health uniting 8 mental health charities, BUT RACHEL HAD NOWHERE TO TURN WHEN SHE was going to off herself AND HARRY COULDN'T HELP HER ------------- oh how sad
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
They should get themselves a job and try to make a living…. They made the wrong decision and they should be paid for their mistakes…. And still they haven’t apologized to the king 👑 Queen 🫅 and their families members. And too all English people the have offended…. Apologies is the first step in their life…. Otherwise they will have plenty time for being great parents.
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
That fact that he didn’t even reach for her… tells you he is full well aware it is BS. I think she is holding him hostage with blackmail. Like he doesn’t look happy at all and is probably embarrassed to come clean like in most emotionally abusive relationships.
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.'''
Where do you get this nonsense! People say "stop writing and printing lies" and you equate this with "wanting privacy"? That is quite illogical and doesn't reflect good sense or intellectual rigor....keep trying, I'm sure you can do better if you put away the root beer float, twinkie, and Keno card 😂
@@beemee4416 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
So, your thesis statement is that THEY are bullies. Okay.... Exactly who did they bully and when? How? Go ahead, lay out your facts and data, times, places, specific people....we will wait for your insightful critical analysis. Not regurgitated misinformation from the UK version of the National Enquirer, but actual facts that you have personally collected, vetted, confirmed, and analyzed. I'll check back in a few days to see what you and Samantha have come up with.
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
Jane Polley asked her what she did when she was suicidal. There was no answer. As a person's that has suffered, I went into a hospital and had extensive therapy. I reached out to whomever would help. I am not hearing this. HR was not going to help me. I wish my parent was a social worker, like Megan's, who she could go to.
@ocdman202 0 seconds ago I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
Meghan used suicidal ideation to manipulate her husband, she even went to great lengths explaining to him how she'd do it, but stopped after she felt sorry for him, not wanting him to lose another woman in his life; that, my friends , is called emotional abuse , emotional manipulation , coercive control . So what did Harry do afterwards ? He dragged his heavily pregnant wife to watch Cirque du Soleil instead of getting her help because * check notes * _HE_ felt ashamed . The math ain't mathing and to grin "I'm still here" shows her plan worked. Exploiting other people's sorrows for clout is just abhorrent , especially when bullies such as H & M are known for abusing their staff and when they're not hiring and firing them their fans on social media are harassing people critical of their behaviour and hypocrisy . Stop using the grief of others to shield yourselves from criticism , it's ghoulish .
The worst part? IM 99.99% sure Meghan lied about wanting to off herself. As someone who actually tried 2x decades ago, it is not something I would EVER smile about while discussing.. She can't tell the truth if her life depended on it.
So, your thesis statement is that THEY are bullies. Okay.... Exactly who did they bully and when? How? Go ahead, lay out your facts and data, times, places, specific people....we will wait for your insightful critical analysis. Not regurgitated misinformation from the UK version of the National Enquirer, but actual facts that you have personally collected, vetted, confirmed, and analyzed. I'll check back in a few days to see what you and Samantha have come up with.
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
All she has to do is sneeze and all you haters will have something to say. Imagine disliking/hating someone you don’t even know. 🙄 Someone who hasn’t committed any crimes, just spoke about HER LIFE experiences. No one knows what goes on behind closed doors except those are living it, they have and haters have the audacity to mad about it. The funniest fact about this, is everyone loving Diana, meanwhile she did the exact same thing. If she was still alive, all you hypocrites would have something to say.
@@naomiAcronym Me Gain should be so thankful that he provided good dental work for her, because her teeth were a real mess before she got them fixed.... I work in the dental field and the pictures show she had a real bad diastema == that means a bad separation between the two front teeth " usually genetic" and that has been cosmetically corrected very well... that does not come cheap... her other teeth have been cosmetically corrected and she is a very lucky girl that her father did that for her... she was able to get work in film and snag a prince so she really owes her dad a lot for fixing her teeth as a teenager.
Let your voices be known. If you do not like seeing these two (well Me Again) complaining about her privileged life to steal the thunder from her husband while he's in New York, then downvote this video. Let your voices be heard.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase....
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
I will never forget that when Prince Phillip was in hospital, Meghan and Harry continued with their disingenuous and lack of empathy Oprah interview. When Prince Harry’s Grandfather was dying, they were so mean and childish. At this point, I knew they didn’t have the intelligence, understanding or statesmanship to be leaders on the world stage, and Meghan’s plan was always to drag Harry to California. Emotionally mature adults would have had conversations and dealt with issues in private as a family. But Meghan Markle didn’t care; she was out for revenge, so she sat with Lie-Oprah and orchestrated a smear campaign to attack Harry’s family because she needed an excuse as to why they left; it had to be the Royal Family and not her who was chasing Hollywood fame and money. (BTW, Harry messed up and said to Oprah that his family were very welcoming to Meghan, “my father, my brother, Kate they were all very welcoming, better than I expected”. We know he got an earful after filming) They told so many blatant lies and purposely gave answers without context so haters of the Royal Family would create false narratives. What was more sad is that Queen Elizabeth II had to deal with this unnecessary and unfair fallout while her beloved husband for 73 years was dying and then died. I will never forget the nasty hashtags and content the Sussex Squad posted after this; disgusting. Most of the British public supported Harry and Meghan leaving if it was what Harry wanted and made him happy, but after that disastrous interview, the public mood soon shifted to shock and anger. A lot of people were done with the two privileged, selfish brats. Let’s be clear: Meghan didn’t have mental health issues, she couldn’t take the lack of control, she couldn’t sue every newspaper that printed nonsense but had some truth to it, wanted to merch her connection to the RF and she couldn’t handle the high level of scrutiny or deliver the standard of responsibility that was expected from her. Doria her mother was an alleged social worker but didn’t help her 🤨, and Harry had his therapist on speed dial but didn’t help her 🤨 he even said to Oprah that he didn’t tell his family because he felt ashamed. So if the family wasn’t informed, then they can’t be blamed for anything; plus she had plenty of access to help if she needed or wanted it. Her fabricated story has so many holes. The worst part of that interview is how she lied about the colour of Archie’s skin, the question that didn’t happen the way her manipulative mind painted it out to be and the Duo told a complete different story when interviewed separately that lie-Oprah didn’t pushback on. If Harry had cared for his Grandparents, he would have never done that lying interview. What was heartbreaking is that #PrincePhillip went to his grave thinking the world believed Meghan and Harry’s lies and didn’t get to the part where most of the world realised that Recollections May Vary. When Prince Phillip died, I knew Meghan Markle was a narcissist. Harry was displaying tendencies as only a narcissistic person would continue attacking a family at this low point and have this level of lack of empathy or self awareness. They created an unnecessary media storm and then played the victim when they could have just gone and lived the private life they claimed they wanted with their millions of pounds in the bank. Queen Elizabeth II had a broken heart, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex didn’t care. They continued to brief the media with lies, disinformation and grift off the titles the late Queen had gifted them. I will never forget the lead-up to the late Duke of Edinburgh’s death and what followed; words can’t comprehend the level of narcissism, disrespect and disgusting behaviour displayed by two ungrateful, spoilt and cruel cosplaying humanitarians. Rest in peace, Prince Phillip (World War II veteran) and thank you for your 70+ years of service to our country
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.'''''
Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
What Meghan and Harry are saying makes no sense.The internet is not the problem and we have free will how we use social media.We are in control how we want to use it.Meghan and Harry are only talking about the negative side of the internet meanwhile there are many more positive things.Also instead of saying that the parents are not to blame but the social media is in my opinion to easy to say.Of course the parents didn’t want to loose their child in that tragic way but a lot of times parents want their children on the internet or behind television to get some peace and to do something in the house and they are not checking what the children are watching or how long they are busy on the internet.Maybe parents shouldn’t give their children a iPhone at a young age.And it’s hard to keep tracking what the teenagers are doing on the internet because they want their privacy.Its the parents responsibility to talk to their children and teach them about how to use social media and how not.We don’t need Harry and Meghan to tell us what to do.
Find us the EXACT date, time, place and factual resource that shows they asked for PRIVACY!!!! Go ahead look it up----maybe the "My pillow" guy cam help you find it. Newsflash: You won't find it! What you will find is a strong, 10 year army veteran defending his wife from relentless lies printed by rags not fit for the bird cage!! What would you expect any GOOD HUSBAND to do when his wife is bullied and insulted by her in-laws? If you have a son you have raised right and ANYBODY bullied his wife, what would you expect your son to do? If you have a daughter who was hated without cause wouldn't you be darn proud of her for holding her head up and living her best life? So what exactly is YOUR PERSONAL BEEF with people you HAVE NEVER MET?? ARE You a logical thinker or a follower and illogical reactionary? You get to decide!!
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''''
@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business.
@@beemee4416 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
A low point in Pauley’s career. Beginning with the warm embrace with Markle, before the sit down interview had begun. Not professional. Was Pauley hoping for a limited edition pot of jam? Or some artisanal dog biscuits?
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
@@AABB-ii6hf The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''
Exactly how are they "spoiled"?? Please enlighten us.....Also please share a list of foundations you've started, money you've donated, Veteran's support organizations you've started and how you use your wealth and influence to shine a light on important issues. If you're going to come for people who are doing ALL the things just listed you better be prepared to back it up with how you are better!! Otherwise you're just spiteful, hateful talk.
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! ...
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@kansasrose2909 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
Real question. What should the solution be? Also, as a parent you can put safe guards in place by monitoring everything they do online and have conversations. But what are they thinking the solution should be that would help? Everyone have a great day :)
It's real big of them to give advice and neither can get along with their own family and neighbors. They need stay out of the spotlight like they said they wanted. They are such hypocrites.
Let's face it, though. They love the attention. Same as Diana. She would even call the press to tell them where she was going to be at.. They're loving the attention.
You are parroting what the rags have written but have not taken the time to really find out what happened with them. They are not giving advise, they are helping, in coordination with other parents who've lost their children, to address bullying, drugs and other situations that influence youngsters to die either by accidental overdoses or suicide. I imagine you happy go lucky getting along with everyone and your neighbors. Do you?
Do you believe her? Who really believes her? This comes from someone who definitely has experienced those thoughts. You don't play around with those statements. I feel like I'm going to lose my guts listening to what "I believe" are lies.
As someone who has experienced such feelings your lack of compassion and unwillingness to believe someone else without judging her is chilling! I find it so disturbing to hear so many Americans coldly and clinically dismiss the feelings and experiences of another human being simply because they hate the person! Your culture is frightening, unfeeling and cold!
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! ...
@@beemee4416 , no I do not believe Meghan ever experienced suicidal ideation. And that means you. I think you like to believe your own lies. But people who have really experienced it are the ones that need so much mercy. Then there's you. And it's frightening.
I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.'''
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.,,,
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
I would like to point out that while the United Kingdom acknowledges and takes proactive steps to address the use of SSRIs for suicidal and homicidal ideation, the United States, aside from including a black box warning on prescriptions, does not take similar measures.
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase....
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''''
AbiBrown you are not God and you don't get to tell other people where and how to live their lives.....Your bingo card and pack of Marlboros are waiting
@@beemee4416 I agree, you have the 48 year old once annulled, once divorced Jam Seller and the feckless ex royal prodigal prince turned reality award show attendee, who wouldn't want to see that?
Mememe is absolutely sickening. You can feel her inauthenticity; her disdain. The only reason I looked this up was to see of there would be more about the parents. Thank goodness there is, bc I would never sit thru this bs otherwise. During their part with Jane, Harry is trying to get as far away from his cold grasping wife as possible. Neither Mememe nor Harry are covering their revulsion very well. The abbreviated interview clearly showed Harry physically recoil from mememe when she turned & looked at him & started to talk. Her expression was venomous for a long enough moment that was not missable. When that grieving mother was speaking, expressing her pain, her shock - mememe sits there like a stone - hard, cold, unfeeling. I could see no sign of empathy or even a bit of compassion for a fellow mom who is experiencing the absolute worst nightmare a parent can experience. Mememe has nothing to give. I hope CBS cuts these 2 OUT and runs the parts that focus on the parents & what they are building. Research more into that parent network thing - I have read it is primarily a data grab & by entering their information & stories, those then become the property of Archewell. These 2 need to be kept away from the public. They really are not nice, at least together. Looking at the "products" they have produced & all the failures & all the vitriol towards their respective families, they just need to stay out sight & be silent. Most of us are truly sickened by them & their publicity stunts. I know I am.
@@courtneyhouser8008 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
@@courtneyhouser8008 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
In yet another blow to the controversial partnership between Netflix and the Sussexes, it appears Prince Harry’s upcoming polo documentary has left the streaming giant fuming. The five-part series, originally touted as an exploration of Harry’s beloved sport, polo, has reportedly failed to meet Netflix's expectations. According to insiders, the series is on the chopping block, and Netflix is seriously contemplating pulling the plug on the show altogether.
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.0
@@jml4774 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
jml4774. U mean the person Hollywood Reporter Named as Dictator in heels and she couldn't sue them?? Why can sue since she is anti bullying?? So strange!!
@@jml4774 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
@@AABB-ii6hf"Hollywood Reporter " did you actually just list that rag as a reputable news source? You forgot to list the National Inquirer, their journalistic excellence had long been a mainstay of the most discerning readers😂😂😂😂
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
The BIG HUGGERS…..this is all about the BIG HUGGERS……PLEASE! Just let the parents talk…….We have heard her stories over 🙄and 🙄and🙄again. The parents need to be at the forefront. H&M should concentrate on alleviating the pain they cause their own families. 🤬🤯😡
YOU are part of the problem. YOU think they haven't been mistreated? Cast out? Did you even read 'Spare'. I would guess not. If it wasn't for their 'celebrity' this foundation would be underground, perhaps, nonexistent.
You do realize that Jane Pauley asked.her.queations.that.jane.herself. wrote.right? I separate d the words with periods to make it easier for you to comprehend my ironic statement.....oh boy! Perhaps I should not have used irony, I fear it may rather go over your capacity to understand........
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
It's a noble cause, 1. to take-on this monster 2. to forfeit one's privacy to do so 3. to utilize one's platform on the world stage to help humanity (Bill Gates and Mark Zukerberg only permit(ed) their children 1hr of on-line recreational time)
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.aa
It's obvious. The money went on private jets, obscure awards they paid for them to receive and the wife's badly fitted beige wardrobe....not enough left for an iron though
When peole let it be known they do lots for charity, you have to read between the lines, as a large percentage of them make a very good living off the backs of those who donate cash and those who volunteer thier time.
Eric Schiffer, chair of Reputation Management Consultants, told Newsweek the saga would be damaging to Meghan despite the counter narrative. "Meghan's challenges are immense because this now is a pattern of behavior outside of Britain that calls into question a level of horrible incompetence in leadership," he said. "She is now seen as the enemy of staffers who are fleeing because of the devastating environment. None of which is good for Meghan when she is still recovering from the reputational damage from across the pond. "These are current allegations. What it says is that she's either painfully deluded about her own behavior or there's a series of people who are choosing to lie to reporters which doesn't seem to ring as true. "This scandalabra she's facing is not just a smoking crater on her reputation but now begins to draw into question her judgement and her ability to control herself and her behavior."
The Hollywood Reporter's editor told Access Hollywood that the magazine had spoken to 12 employees, and that one of them was a current senior staffer. The source blamed Meghan's behavior for a high turnover, or "churn," rate at Archewell and the article referenced a number of employees by name. Some of those contributed quotes to the Us Weekly fight back story, though the most significant contributions came from the couple's current press secretary, Ashley Hansen, and former Archewell president Mandana Dayani. "The Hollywood Reporter has great credibility and authority in reporting accurately the inner workings and behind the scenes truth of many of the most prominent people within entertainment," Schiffer said. "And their reporting is relied upon and looked to as a credible source of reliable information both by leaders within the industry, but also other respected media organizations. "Meghan's pushback is text book crisis management where she will leverage staffers that may have a different perspective or loyalty to her. "That will allow her to reshape the narrative somewhat versus just one side where there's no pushback. "Either way, having a second set of allegations outside of Britain where there's now a pattern is like the plague for her where she's trying to show none of the original allegations were true. "Patterns begin to then create questions that go to character and that is dangerous at a time when she is trying to ensure her personal brand-and together as a couple-is one that could be looked at in an elevated fashion."
I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
“Royal observers say there is a new strategy to remind people of the Prince ‘they loved.’” “On Monday night, Prince Harry bounded into the WellChild Awards in London with a smile and set about making a fuss of the children who had gathered to meet him. Picking up soft toys that had been thrown on the floor, calling the young winners “little legends” and crouching down among animal balloons, he seemed at home among the staff and beneficiaries of the charity he has supported as patron for 16 years. He looked “very jolly”, one observer said, and a line of his speech in which he told parents of seriously ill children, “You’ve got this. And we’ve got you” earned the shouted response “we’ve got you too” from one member of the audience. Unusually, though, the event was the seventh solo engagement the Duke of Sussex had undertaken in seven days. The Duchess and their children did not travel to London, or to New York where the Prince gave five high profile speeches last week and appeared on Jimmy Fallon’s The Tonight Show. Nor was the Duchess accompanying Harry when he arrived in Lesotho on Tuesday for what became his eighth solo appearance in as many days. Particularly given the couple’s previous joint trips to Nigeria and Colombia in recent months, the Duke’s solo appearances have raised, perhaps inevitably, the question: Where’s Meghan? For a couple who have described themselves as “salt and pepper” because they “always move together”, and bought their Montecito house because two “connected” palm trees were reminiscent of their relationship, their professional separation is new. ““There has been a separation [of their work] for a while,” notes PR strategist Mark Borkowski, who has followed coverage of the Sussexes closely. “It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to think there’s something going on. She has been doing the jam thing, the Martha Stewart play. He seems to be going back to basics.” The “star power” they were expected to have together when they first left Britain, he says, “didn’t work” as hoped. “They had to change the narrative. They need a venture that deflects from the failures. The charity aspect impresses upon everybody that he [Harry] does have value beyond the controversial stuff. It has the effect of separating them from the bad press and the failed content ideas. “The punters still have time for Harry.” Reports that Prince Harry is seeking a form of return to Britain have been emphatically denied by sources close to the Sussexes, who have pointed out how happy he is now with “amazing” new friends and projects on the horizon. He has “no interest” in returning to royal duties, they say.”
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''
Strong men defend and protect their beloved wives. Weak minded people insult such men because they have either never loved or have never been loved like that.... Very sad and much to ne pitied!!
@@beemee4416 Well maybe Rachel Ragland-Markle-Engelson-Mountbatten-Windsor will meet a strong man someday to reign her in as they have had 18 professional staff and 20 domestic staff leave, quit, exit, escape them in five years' time and there is now a thing out there called "The Sussex Survivor Club - SO TELLING
@@kansasrose2909 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! .
Griefters. They’ve taken grifting to its most horrific level. Exploiting grief-stricken parents for their own censorship goals, their own money goals, their own narcissism goals. So disturbing.
The network to protect form online bullying is online which is where the bullying was.Though Meghan claimed that she didn't look at social media during her engagement interview with Harry.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
Which lies are you referring to? You seem to have insider information and a deeply personal connection to what went on behind closed doors, in the UK.....in palaces..... Please enlighten us with your insider information....that you gleaned while sitting on the barcalounger on your front porch in Minnesota....
@@beemee4416 hi I’m a person with a brain who can read AMERICAN news sources and SEE her actions with my own eyes. Not everyone is ignorant to what’s going on in this world. It’s very easy to assume people are blind…no insider information needed to see both of them obviously virtue signaling for clout. No products have come out of any of their deals. Prove me wrong please.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! ..
How so? Please explain. You have clearly met her, know her personally and can share insightful, logical, and well reasoned statements backed by facts (not baseless opinons) that we would all love to hear! I have begun to wonder seriously about the general level of intelligence among the average person in your culture. It's actually deeply alarming!!
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
@@ocdman202 I will never forget that when Prince Phillip was in hospital, Meghan and Harry continued with their disingenuous and lack of empathy Oprah interview. When Prince Harry’s Grandfather was dying, they were so mean and childish. At this point, I knew they didn’t have the intelligence, understanding or statesmanship to be leaders on the world stage, and Meghan’s plan was always to drag Harry to California. Emotionally mature adults would have had conversations and dealt with issues in private as a family. But Meghan Markle didn’t care; she was out for revenge, so she sat with Lie-Oprah and orchestrated a smear campaign to attack Harry’s family because she needed an excuse as to why they left; it had to be the Royal Family and not her who was chasing Hollywood fame and money. (BTW, Harry messed up and said to Oprah that his family were very welcoming to Meghan, “my father, my brother, Kate they were all very welcoming, better than I expected”. We know he got an earful after filming) They told so many blatant lies and purposely gave answers without context so haters of the Royal Family would create false narratives. What was more sad is that Queen Elizabeth II had to deal with this unnecessary and unfair fallout while her beloved husband for 73 years was dying and then died. I will never forget the nasty hashtags and content the Sussex Squad posted after this; disgusting. Most of the British public supported Harry and Meghan leaving if it was what Harry wanted and made him happy, but after that disastrous interview, the public mood soon shifted to shock and anger. A lot of people were done with the two privileged, selfish brats. Let’s be clear: Meghan didn’t have mental health issues, she couldn’t take the lack of control, she couldn’t sue every newspaper that printed nonsense but had some truth to it, wanted to merch her connection to the RF and she couldn’t handle the high level of scrutiny or deliver the standard of responsibility that was expected from her. Doria her mother was an alleged social worker but didn’t help her 🤨, and Harry had his therapist on speed dial but didn’t help her 🤨 he even said to Oprah that he didn’t tell his family because he felt ashamed. So if the family wasn’t informed, then they can’t be blamed for anything; plus she had plenty of access to help if she needed or wanted it. Her fabricated story has so many holes. The worst part of that interview is how she lied about the colour of Archie’s skin, the question that didn’t happen the way her manipulative mind painted it out to be and the Duo told a complete different story when interviewed separately that lie-Oprah didn’t pushback on. If Harry had cared for his Grandparents, he would have never done that lying interview. What was heartbreaking is that #PrincePhillip went to his grave thinking the world believed Meghan and Harry’s lies and didn’t get to the part where most of the world realised that Recollections May Vary. When Prince Phillip died, I knew Meghan Markle was a narcissist. Harry was displaying tendencies as only a narcissistic person would continue attacking a family at this low point and have this level of lack of empathy or self awareness. They created an unnecessary media storm and then played the victim when they could have just gone and lived the private life they claimed they wanted with their millions of pounds in the bank. Queen Elizabeth II had a broken heart, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex didn’t care. They continued to brief the media with lies, disinformation and grift off the titles the late Queen had gifted them. I will never forget the lead-up to the late Duke of Edinburgh’s death and what followed; words can’t comprehend the level of narcissism, disrespect and disgusting behaviour displayed by two ungrateful, spoilt and cruel cosplaying humanitarians. Rest in peace, Prince Phillip (World War II veteran) and thank you for your 70+ years of service to our country..
I actually thought I'd clicked on to a comedy channel then realised it is actually the duke and duchess 😮 got to laugh I mean the duke and duchess more like the fluke and fxx x it😅😅 harry and Meghan 😴😔
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼ The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable. Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization. And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability? Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant. The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world. The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference? But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!! ...
why dont you look into it and get it right. h & m did not create a network, they hopped on a bandwagon as per usual
@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business.
@@kansasrose2909 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.''''
Grifters as they were once described
why is she smiling the whole time?
It’s called duping delight or duper’s delight.
@@olderwiser64 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
She’s not genuine that’s why.😏
Because she’s not bitter like you
What makes these two experts on parenting and cyber bullying? Look how they treat their own families. These are the last two individuals I would go to for assistance.
They are expert at cyber bullying ;)
martinkrukenberg4590 and they dont stop their fanbase, the crazy Sussex Squad from bullying online. I have seen some of the things they wrote and Im convinced they are lunatics
Thank goodness! I’m a nurse and it’s dangerous to listen to them let alone have them talk to children (like in Nigeria) when they have no education, certification or license to be telling anyone anything. I was upset with this segment shame on CBS.
Harry and Meghan spent 20 minutes saying nothing. Grifting off the backs of these parents’ pain. Disgusting!
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;
I've never before seen somebody talk about the darkest and most hopeless time in her life, whilst looking so gleeful and smug. It's chill inducing. Something is truly wrong with this woman, down to her core.
Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.00
Absolutely hypocritical people, they live a huge Hollywood lifestyle, live in a twelve million dollar mansion but beg others for charitable donations, it doesn’t add up to me, somethings not right.
The money went to the most deserving. That is 'arry and his boss, Obviously the most deserving people on the planet having been oppressed for their whole life,
Diana certainly had her faults but it's really sad to see things like this associated with her just because Harry treads on her legacy so much. There is zero chance that Meghan would have made it past the first date if Diana was still alive and she would be wholly ashamed of the things Harry has done in the last few years, especially him trying to tarnish the future reign of William. Anyone who thinks she would still support Harry after all this is truly delusional.
We dont need this bs in an extended version...it just shows even more how fake they are. She was never suicidal...they behave so weird.
An Interview no one asked to see the Extended cut of
Again
Didn't these 2 want privacy?!
I don't care about them
No one cares about them
Wtf are they even talking about? Is this about cyber bullying or drugs? You can’t get rid of social media so they have said absolutely nothing or helpful. 🙄
They are trying to get rid of freedom of speech. SOOOO many people are calling her out for her lies and narcissism, they *H &M* want all the criticism silenced.
@@Irishangel831 If I hear her tell that dish soap story one more time, I will fly to Mars...
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 even that story isn't true....
She is not happy with him talking.
Using mourning parents for self-promotion is disgraceful!
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
I think this story would could have been told without Harry and Megan. I think everyone is kind of over them.
YES!!! 💯
Because you have personally spoken to "Everyone".....how is "Everyone" doing? How are the kids, work, little league practice? Say hi to "Everyone" the next time you speak! Ask them how it feels to live a purpose driven life, do good for others, and use the relentless media attention to shine a light on important issues that matter to you and society. What do YOU personally do to make this world better for others? Hmmmmmm? Let us know, okay?
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
9:19 the smirk when she says whats she's "overcome". So rehearsed. So fake. Actress through n through n not a very good one
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
If I hear her tell that dish soap story one more time, I will fly to Mars...
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???....
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?
It always seems she is acting
Always auditioning for the role she'll never get
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
...
She iS just not very well
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???;
I can not believe CBS giving any further media coverage to this bully? There are 12 people only last week speaking out on their sufferings with this woman, and you still put this nasty person on your channel, shame on you!!
Name all the people, share your factual sources and evidence of your assertions. You PERSONALLY spoke to these people, you verified their stories? What do you do for work? Is attention to detail, integrity, and honesty required or do you typically b.s. your way through your day?
@@beemee4416 , 12 signed affidavits. Check it out.
@@beemee4416 easy Meghan. Delulu
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
If Meghan talks about helping others, why not help her own father first? The father who raised her. Meghan has abandoned his father since marrying Harry. These are solid facts.
Spot on
What about helping Harry get over losing his Mummy and get over his phobia of cameras/paps? What about defending her sister-in-law from online bully for her cancer? What about helping the Baka people from torture and abuse? Lots more but these are most obvious.
Yes-- let's talk about the father who took money from a tabloid, was a no show for his daughter's wedding, leaked a private letter and went on tabloid TV to trash her. That father---ok dear, I want you to visit your local library, get a card (because reading is fundamental) check out a book called "Mommy Dearest "and write a 4 page critical analysis of abusive parenting practices and how these can be avoided. Go ahead, we will wait with bated breath for you to share more of your deeply insightful commentary!! 😊
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!..
The WORST part of this is that Meghan takes the attention off of these poor suffering parents to get sympathy for herself. But no one even realizes this. Ugh.
Really? Wow…guess I watched the wrong interview
@@jessicastevenson2749 , yes. Really. Guess you have to see enough of her to recognize it.
She is so full of herself and a Princess Diana-wannabe. She could never be close to half of what Harry's mother was and still is
@@pamelam7696oh, so you know her personally? Weird that you’re talking about her on UA-cam when you’re her best friend…
@@mkfd4571 , yep. I do.
Giving these bullies another opportunity 😂
She needs to be investigated by the California Labor Commissioner's Office. Enough is enough! How many employees is this? Close to 30 by now. They suffer under the abuse..
“Harassment becomes unlawful where 1) enduring the offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment, or 2) the conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a work environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive.”
The Hollywood Reporter has TWELVE sources who had worked for the Sussexes for their bombshell article revealing staff are "terrified" of Meghan Markle and refer to her as the "dictator in high heels". She bullies her staff until they can't take it anymore....
The former employees are terrified because they have bills to pay and don’t want to be blacklisted or blackballed so they put up with her rubbish. She threatens that she has contacts with the most powerful people Oprah, WME and Tyler Perry who will blacklist and blackball them.
@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business.
,,,,
@@kansasrose2909 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
5:19 6:14 lol. she does not like it when he is speaking
Haha, she never likes anyone else speaking! She always has to be the centre of attention! Complete narcissist!
CBS: How many thumbs down did this video get???
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.'
She looks like the sociopath she is in this interview and I think Pauly hates her. Harry too.
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time. ''
They are a joke
They-have lost all credibility
And your news show has all credibility
She is pathetic!
Go away
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???.
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???...
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?
Videos like this are the reason youtube disabled dislikes.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?,,,
Prince Harry is ALARMINGLY BALD
@@ocdman202 If he is bald, why is she the one with the wig on?...
What's this? We already know that backstory of the chaos that went on behind the scenes of this interview. Could it be that Markle needs some good propaganda to quiet the Hollywood Reporter story?? The stories of her being a terrible boss and a bully are not going to go away. Just wait until the "hysterectomy at 28" truth comes out.
old interview
She tells the world instead. She is such a lying horrible person
If I hear her tell that dish soap story one more time, I will fly to Mars...
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;;;;;;;;
Yawn, that couple again talking " me me me"..... 🙄
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.000
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
What a coincidence CBS dropped this extended interview when Harry is in NYC. Megan must have called in some favors. She can’t stay out of the spotlight for 1 minute. Did she even watch this interview it’s terrible.
Have some compassion. You don’t know what she’s been through, feeling suicidal.
@@gracehope7BS.
@@gracehope7 , I do because I have been. I don't believe for one second she was ever suicidal. Sorry.
@@gracehope7 It is soo sooo sad. Harry and his brother led Heads Together which encourages people to have important conversations about mental health uniting 8 mental health charities, BUT RACHEL HAD NOWHERE TO TURN WHEN SHE was going to off herself AND HARRY COULDN'T HELP HER ------------- oh how sad
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!...
They are poor role models and have no place to tell us how to live our lives
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;
They should get themselves a job and try to make a living…. They made the wrong decision and they should be paid for their mistakes…. And still they haven’t apologized to the king 👑 Queen 🫅 and their families members. And too all English people the have offended…. Apologies is the first step in their life…. Otherwise they will have plenty time for being great parents.
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
any thing else???
The way she puts her hand on his leg feels like "don't you dare to say anything stupid"... I had the exact same feeling with Oprah's interview.
That fact that he didn’t even reach for her… tells you he is full well aware it is BS.
I think she is holding him hostage with blackmail. Like he doesn’t look happy at all and is probably embarrassed to come clean like in most emotionally abusive relationships.
Cringed….
The cringiest!!
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜'''
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.'''
I thought they wanted privacy for their Worldwide Privacy Tour they have been doing all these years now. 🙄🙄🙄
Where do you get this nonsense! People say "stop writing and printing lies" and you equate this with "wanting privacy"? That is quite illogical and doesn't reflect good sense or intellectual rigor....keep trying, I'm sure you can do better if you put away the root beer float, twinkie, and Keno card 😂
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!..
@@mommapanda5736 do you mean DOA?..
@@beemee4416 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
Bullies talking about bullying!! Shameful!!
So, your thesis statement is that THEY are bullies. Okay.... Exactly who did they bully and when? How? Go ahead, lay out your facts and data, times, places, specific people....we will wait for your insightful critical analysis. Not regurgitated misinformation from the UK version of the National Enquirer, but actual facts that you have personally collected, vetted, confirmed, and analyzed. I'll check back in a few days to see what you and Samantha have come up with.
@@beemee4416Read the Hollywood Reporter just for starters. 12 signed affidavits.
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
Jane Polley asked her what she did when she was suicidal. There was no answer. As a person's that has suffered, I went into a hospital and had extensive therapy. I reached out to whomever would help. I am not hearing this. HR was not going to help me. I wish my parent was a social worker, like Megan's, who she could go to.
@ocdman202
0 seconds ago
I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
A very hypocritical couple..exploiting their titles and criticizing it at the same time.
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
As a proud Sussexer I agree with you
Why did we need more of this???? She is always trying to prove a point....
adolescent behavior on overload...
Meghan used suicidal ideation to manipulate her husband, she even went to great lengths explaining to him how she'd do it, but stopped after she felt sorry for him, not wanting him to lose another woman in his life; that, my friends , is called emotional abuse , emotional manipulation , coercive control . So what did Harry do afterwards ? He dragged his heavily pregnant wife to watch Cirque du Soleil instead of getting her help because * check notes * _HE_ felt ashamed . The math ain't mathing and to grin "I'm still here" shows her plan worked. Exploiting other people's sorrows for clout is just abhorrent , especially when bullies such as H & M are known for abusing their staff and when they're not hiring and firing them their fans on social media are harassing people critical of their behaviour and hypocrisy . Stop using the grief of others to shield yourselves from criticism , it's ghoulish .
The worst part? IM 99.99% sure Meghan lied about wanting to off herself. As someone who actually tried 2x decades ago, it is not something I would EVER smile about while discussing.. She can't tell the truth if her life depended on it.
So, your thesis statement is that THEY are bullies. Okay.... Exactly who did they bully and when? How? Go ahead, lay out your facts and data, times, places, specific people....we will wait for your insightful critical analysis. Not regurgitated misinformation from the UK version of the National Enquirer, but actual facts that you have personally collected, vetted, confirmed, and analyzed. I'll check back in a few days to see what you and Samantha have come up with.
whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...@@beemee4416
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
too much PR
Jane Pauley looks like she's going to fall asleep.
All she has to do is sneeze and all you haters will have something to say. Imagine disliking/hating someone you don’t even know. 🙄 Someone who hasn’t committed any crimes, just spoke about HER LIFE experiences. No one knows what goes on behind closed doors except those are living it, they have and haters have the audacity to mad about it.
The funniest fact about this, is everyone loving Diana, meanwhile she did the exact same thing. If she was still alive, all you hypocrites would have something to say.
When will Thomas Markle get to meet Archie and Lilibet?
Maybe when he acts like a real father, rather than putting money before his own daughter and falsifying information that wound up being harmful.
Gavin Gingras is Archie and Hartford Clark is Lily.
SAME QUESTION.
@@naomiAcronym ALL of the Markles are cut-throat people -which is why MeMe acts so deplorable. The apple doesnt fall far....
@@naomiAcronym Me Gain should be so thankful that he provided good dental work for her, because
her teeth were a real mess before she got them fixed.... I work in the dental field and the pictures show she had
a real bad diastema == that means a bad separation between the two front teeth " usually genetic"
and that has been cosmetically corrected very well... that does not come cheap... her other teeth have
been cosmetically corrected and she is a very lucky girl that her father did that for her... she was able to
get work in film and snag a prince so she really owes her dad a lot for fixing her teeth as a teenager.
Let your voices be known. If you do not like seeing these two (well Me Again) complaining about her privileged life to steal the thunder from her husband while he's in New York, then downvote this video. Let your voices be heard.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
👎👎👎👎👎👎
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???
SAMANTHA'S BOTS AND MINIONS ARE BUSY BEES😅😅😅
@@beemee4416 很多人「很忙」，背後的真相是生活失控。
So, in other words, we met the parents, we had a national interview with the parents, and now they can just run the network alone. These two🙄
These parents....😮😮 These two need to be stopped because they are not qualified to speak
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase....
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
I will never forget that when Prince Phillip was in hospital, Meghan and Harry continued with their disingenuous and lack of empathy Oprah interview.
When Prince Harry’s Grandfather was dying, they were so mean and childish. At this point, I knew they didn’t have the intelligence, understanding or statesmanship to be leaders on the world stage, and Meghan’s plan was always to drag Harry to California.
Emotionally mature adults would have had conversations and dealt with issues in private as a family. But Meghan Markle didn’t care; she was out for revenge, so she sat with Lie-Oprah and orchestrated a smear campaign to attack Harry’s family because she needed an excuse as to why they left; it had to be the Royal Family and not her who was chasing Hollywood fame and money. (BTW, Harry messed up and said to Oprah that his family were very welcoming to Meghan, “my father, my brother, Kate they were all very welcoming, better than I expected”. We know he got an earful after filming)
They told so many blatant lies and purposely gave answers without context so haters of the Royal Family would create false narratives. What was more sad is that Queen Elizabeth II had to deal with this unnecessary and unfair fallout while her beloved husband for 73 years was dying and then died. I will never forget the nasty hashtags and content the Sussex Squad posted after this; disgusting. Most of the British public supported Harry and Meghan leaving if it was what Harry wanted and made him happy, but after that disastrous interview, the public mood soon shifted to shock and anger. A lot of people were done with the two privileged, selfish brats.
Let’s be clear: Meghan didn’t have mental health issues, she couldn’t take the lack of control, she couldn’t sue every newspaper that printed nonsense but had some truth to it, wanted to merch her connection to the RF and she couldn’t handle the high level of scrutiny or deliver the standard of responsibility that was expected from her. Doria her mother was an alleged social worker but didn’t help her 🤨, and Harry had his therapist on speed dial but didn’t help her 🤨 he even said to Oprah that he didn’t tell his family because he felt ashamed. So if the family wasn’t informed, then they can’t be blamed for anything; plus she had plenty of access to help if she needed or wanted it. Her fabricated story has so many holes.
The worst part of that interview is how she lied about the colour of Archie’s skin, the question that didn’t happen the way her manipulative mind painted it out to be and the Duo told a complete different story when interviewed separately that lie-Oprah didn’t pushback on. If Harry had cared for his Grandparents, he would have never done that lying interview.
What was heartbreaking is that #PrincePhillip went to his grave thinking the world believed Meghan and Harry’s lies and didn’t get to the part where most of the world realised that Recollections May Vary.
When Prince Phillip died, I knew Meghan Markle was a narcissist. Harry was displaying tendencies as only a narcissistic person would continue attacking a family at this low point and have this level of lack of empathy or self awareness. They created an unnecessary media storm and then played the victim when they could have just gone and lived the private life they claimed they wanted with their millions of pounds in the bank.
Queen Elizabeth II had a broken heart, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex didn’t care. They continued to brief the media with lies, disinformation and grift off the titles the late Queen had gifted them.
I will never forget the lead-up to the late Duke of Edinburgh’s death and what followed; words can’t comprehend the level of narcissism, disrespect and disgusting behaviour displayed by two ungrateful, spoilt and cruel cosplaying humanitarians.
Rest in peace, Prince Phillip (World War II veteran) and thank you for your 70+ years of service to our country
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.'''''
Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;;
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
What Meghan and Harry are saying makes no sense.The internet is not the problem and we have free will how we use social media.We are in control how we want to use it.Meghan and Harry are only talking about the negative side of the internet meanwhile there are many more positive things.Also instead of saying that the parents are not to blame but the social media is in my opinion to easy to say.Of course the parents didn’t want to loose their child in that tragic way but a lot of times parents want their children on the internet or behind television to get some peace and to do something in the house and they are not checking what the children are watching or how long they are busy on the internet.Maybe parents shouldn’t give their children a iPhone at a young age.And it’s hard to keep tracking what the teenagers are doing on the internet because they want their privacy.Its the parents responsibility to talk to their children and teach them about how to use social media and how not.We don’t need Harry and Meghan to tell us what to do.
Couldn't even get thru 2 minutes..Bye Bye
World Wide Privacy Privacy tour: Extended edition!
Find us the EXACT date, time, place and factual resource that shows they asked for PRIVACY!!!! Go ahead look it up----maybe the "My pillow" guy cam help you find it.
Newsflash: You won't find it!
What you will find is a strong, 10 year army veteran defending his wife from relentless lies printed by rags not fit for the bird cage!! What would you expect any GOOD HUSBAND to do when his wife is bullied and insulted by her in-laws? If you have a son you have raised right and ANYBODY bullied his wife, what would you expect your son to do? If you have a daughter who was hated without cause wouldn't you be darn proud of her for holding her head up and living her best life? So what exactly is YOUR PERSONAL BEEF with people you HAVE NEVER MET?? ARE You a logical thinker or a follower and illogical reactionary? You get to decide!!
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''''
If I hear her tell that dish soap story one more time, I will fly to Mars...
@@ocdman202 😜😜😜 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???...
Wow it’s TUESDAY, and “Sunday Morning” episode with Meghan Markle somehow came out EARLY! what a fun coincidence.
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!...
@@mommapanda5736SAMANTHA'S BOTS AND MINIONS ARE BUSY BEES😅😅😅
@@beemee4416 很多人「很忙」，背後的真相是生活失控。
@hollywoodreporter recently won 11 first-place prizes at the L.A Press Club's Journalism Awards, the most of any publication. In addition to Best Website, they won top honors for photography, news writing, feature writing and criticism. Most accurate and fact based in the industry... Kudos to the best team in the business.
@@beemee4416 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
Apart from her dad who may have been driven to suicide. They don’t act as they say and as they do. She is a right madam.
A low point in Pauley’s career. Beginning with the warm embrace with Markle, before the sit down interview had begun. Not professional. Was Pauley hoping for a limited edition pot of jam? Or some artisanal dog biscuits?
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
Why do the media keep giving these two spoiled brats airtime? 🙄
@alanna8983 Because their stories are Comical and Entertaining!!
@@AABB-ii6hf The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''
Exactly how are they "spoiled"?? Please enlighten us.....Also please share a list of foundations you've started, money you've donated, Veteran's support organizations you've started and how you use your wealth and influence to shine a light on important issues. If you're going to come for people who are doing ALL the things just listed you better be prepared to back it up with how you are better!! Otherwise you're just spiteful, hateful talk.
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
...
@@ocdman202 😜😜😜 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
Who the flip are these grifters trying to educate parents 😮😮 hello they are so patronising it's unbelievable
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
Prince Harry is ALARMINGLY BALD
@@ocdman202 If he is bald, why is she the one with the wig on?
@@kansasrose2909 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;;;
Real question. What should the solution be? Also, as a parent you can put safe guards in place by monitoring everything they do online and have conversations. But what are they thinking the solution should be that would help? Everyone have a great day :)
In the meantime, what is happening with her cooking show and her vast worldwide merchandising company?
MM has finally made a jam that people are talking about.
But sadly for her, it is the jam she got herself into
She has no one to blame but herself
Check his reaction to "loving husband"- what a fake she is.
It's real big of them to give advice and neither can get along with their own family and neighbors. They need stay out of the spotlight like they said they wanted. They are such hypocrites.
This is exactly the kind of bullying they are trying to address. If you have nothing positive to contribute, just don't contribute at all.
Let's face it, though. They love the attention. Same as Diana. She would even call the press to tell them where she was going to be at.. They're loving the attention.
Just shut up.
@@jml4774 Facts are not considered bullying. Who are they to give advice, when they themselves can't even get along with their own families? 😂
You are parroting what the rags have written but have not taken the time to really find out what happened with them. They are not giving advise, they are helping, in coordination with other parents who've lost their children, to address bullying, drugs and other situations that influence youngsters to die either by accidental overdoses or suicide. I imagine you happy go lucky getting along with everyone and your neighbors. Do you?
Has any body read that book " Spare" ?
Do you believe her? Who really believes her? This comes from someone who definitely has experienced those thoughts. You don't play around with those statements. I feel like I'm going to lose my guts listening to what "I believe" are lies.
You are absolutely right it isn't credible, because with Meghan it didn't happen and Harry knows that he is in on the lie.
As someone who has experienced such feelings your lack of compassion and unwillingness to believe someone else without judging her is chilling! I find it so disturbing to hear so many Americans coldly and clinically dismiss the feelings and experiences of another human being simply because they hate the person! Your culture is frightening, unfeeling and cold!
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
...
@@beemee4416 , no I do not believe Meghan ever experienced suicidal ideation. And that means you. I think you like to believe your own lies. But people who have really experienced it are the ones that need so much mercy. Then there's you. And it's frightening.
@@beemee4416 , I think Harry needs your support as his wife. Try it.
I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
The best people to help you when you are down are your own. Sadly Harry has no one else to turn to not even his own father and brother. And for what?
Booooooooooooooooooo
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜''
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.'''
@@ocdman202 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.,,,
The comments alone are a testament of how important this is! Still bullying…
Clean up your own house before you speak.
They are bullying under the protection of NDAs. We just remind people how nasty they are.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???...
I would like to point out that while the United Kingdom acknowledges and takes proactive steps to address the use of SSRIs for suicidal and homicidal ideation, the United States, aside from including a black box warning on prescriptions, does not take similar measures.
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜'''
@@mommapanda5736 do you mean DOA?
but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;
oh please not megain again oh thats right she want $$$$ run prince Harry
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
@@mommapanda5736 I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase....
She is wearing a good wig.
She's terrified of growing old.
But she knows how to succeed.
she needs to keep her wig from falling down onto her forehead, maybe use a chin strap,
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''''
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!..
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???....
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?,,,
Everyone needs to stop giving them a platform 🤦🏽♀️
h & m pls go away
AbiBrown you are not God and you don't get to tell other people where and how to live their lives.....Your bingo card and pack of Marlboros are waiting
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@beemee4416 I agree, you have the 48 year old once annulled, once divorced Jam Seller and the feckless ex royal prodigal prince turned reality award show attendee, who wouldn't want to see that?
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@mommapanda5736 do you mean DOA?...
Mememe is absolutely sickening. You can feel her inauthenticity; her disdain. The only reason I looked this up was to see of there would be more about the parents. Thank goodness there is, bc I would never sit thru this bs otherwise. During their part with Jane, Harry is trying to get as far away from his cold grasping wife as possible. Neither Mememe nor Harry are covering their revulsion very well. The abbreviated interview clearly showed Harry physically recoil from mememe when she turned & looked at him & started to talk. Her expression was venomous for a long enough moment that was not missable. When that grieving mother was speaking, expressing her pain, her shock - mememe sits there like a stone - hard, cold, unfeeling. I could see no sign of empathy or even a bit of compassion for a fellow mom who is experiencing the absolute worst nightmare a parent can experience. Mememe has nothing to give. I hope CBS cuts these 2 OUT and runs the parts that focus on the parents & what they are building. Research more into that parent network thing - I have read it is primarily a data grab & by entering their information & stories, those then become the property of Archewell. These 2 need to be kept away from the public. They really are not nice, at least together. Looking at the "products" they have produced & all the failures & all the vitriol towards their respective families, they just need to stay out sight & be silent. Most of us are truly sickened by them & their publicity stunts. I know I am.
💯💯💯💯💯great comment 🇺🇸♥️
Well said!! They are a drain on society and it’s disgusting the way they’re being allowed to use others pain for self promotion.
@@courtneyhouser8008 Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went;;;
@@courtneyhouser8008 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.ll
In yet another blow to the controversial partnership between Netflix and the Sussexes, it appears Prince Harry’s upcoming polo documentary has left the streaming giant fuming. The five-part series, originally touted as an exploration of Harry’s beloved sport, polo, has reportedly failed to meet Netflix's expectations. According to insiders, the series is on the chopping block, and Netflix is seriously contemplating pulling the plug on the show altogether.
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
i wouldnt watch these 2 if they were the last couple on Earth
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 😜😜😜 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???....@@ocdman202
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.0
Just such a turn off these two!
This is exactly the kind of bullying they are trying to address. If you have nothing positive to contribute, just don't contribute at all.
@jml4774 we need to remind others of their lies.
@@jml4774 Clean up your own house before you talk.
@@jml4774 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
@@ocdman202 😜😜😜 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!..
Don’t give these losers airtime.
This is exactly the kind of bullying they are trying to address. If you have nothing positive to contribute, just don't contribute at all.
jml4774. U mean the person Hollywood Reporter Named as Dictator in heels and she couldn't sue them??
Why can sue since she is anti bullying?? So strange!!
@@jml4774 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
@@AABB-ii6hf"Hollywood Reporter " did you actually just list that rag as a reputable news source? You forgot to list the National Inquirer, their journalistic excellence had long been a mainstay of the most discerning readers😂😂😂😂
@@beemee4416 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
You guys have the best news entertainment and commentary 😊kind
The BIG HUGGERS…..this is all about the BIG HUGGERS……PLEASE! Just let the parents talk…….We have heard her stories over 🙄and 🙄and🙄again. The parents need to be at the forefront. H&M should concentrate on alleviating the pain they cause their own families. 🤬🤯😡
YOU are part of the problem. YOU think they haven't been mistreated? Cast out? Did you even read 'Spare'. I would guess not. If it wasn't for their 'celebrity' this foundation would be underground, perhaps, nonexistent.
@@catherinerosner970
You do realize that Jane Pauley asked.her.queations.that.jane.herself. wrote.right? I separate d the words with periods to make it easier for you to comprehend my ironic statement.....oh boy! Perhaps I should not have used irony, I fear it may rather go over your capacity to understand........
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...''
@beemee4416 Go away sugar.
Thank you Prince Harry and Megan😊
A lot of you are blaming her husbands, but what is the common denominator in all three marriages? It’s her. It’s time for her to look inward, instead of outward to find happiness. Her kids could benefit from seeing her happy on her own, without being in a relationship.
Following soon: "Waaagh 2".
It's a noble cause,
1. to take-on this monster
2. to forfeit one's privacy to do so
3. to utilize one's platform on the
world stage to help humanity
(Bill Gates and Mark Zukerberg only permit(ed) their children 1hr of on-line recreational time)
Continued: 1hr daily, that is ⏳
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
Prince Harry is ALARMINGLY BALD;;;
If he is bald, why is she the one with the wig on?@@ocdman202
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.
Missing visas, missing millions, missing donations, missing staff, missing kids...what's not missing with these two?
Sounds like the books are being 'cooked.'
@@mommapanda5736 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.aa
It's obvious. The money went on private jets, obscure awards they paid for them to receive and the wife's badly fitted beige wardrobe....not enough left for an iron though
When peole let it be known they do lots for charity, you have to read between the lines, as a large percentage of them make a very good living off the backs of those who donate cash and those who volunteer thier time.
but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
Eric Schiffer, chair of Reputation Management Consultants, told Newsweek the saga would be damaging to Meghan despite the counter narrative.
"Meghan's challenges are immense because this now is a pattern of behavior outside of Britain that calls into question a level of horrible incompetence in leadership," he said.
"She is now seen as the enemy of staffers who are fleeing because of the devastating environment. None of which is good for Meghan when she is still recovering from the reputational damage from across the pond.
"These are current allegations. What it says is that she's either painfully deluded about her own behavior or there's a series of people who are choosing to lie to reporters which doesn't seem to ring as true.
"This scandalabra she's facing is not just a smoking crater on her reputation but now begins to draw into question her judgement and her ability to control herself and her behavior."
The Hollywood Reporter's editor told Access Hollywood that the magazine had spoken to 12 employees, and that one of them was a current senior staffer.
The source blamed Meghan's behavior for a high turnover, or "churn," rate at Archewell and the article referenced a number of employees by name.
Some of those contributed quotes to the Us Weekly fight back story, though the most significant contributions came from the couple's current press secretary, Ashley Hansen, and former Archewell president Mandana Dayani.
"The Hollywood Reporter has great credibility and authority in reporting accurately the inner workings and behind the scenes truth of many of the most prominent people within entertainment," Schiffer said.
"And their reporting is relied upon and looked to as a credible source of reliable information both by leaders within the industry, but also other respected media organizations.
"Meghan's pushback is text book crisis management where she will leverage staffers that may have a different perspective or loyalty to her.
"That will allow her to reshape the narrative somewhat versus just one side where there's no pushback.
"Either way, having a second set of allegations outside of Britain where there's now a pattern is like the plague for her where she's trying to show none of the original allegations were true.
"Patterns begin to then create questions that go to character and that is dangerous at a time when she is trying to ensure her personal brand-and together as a couple-is one that could be looked at in an elevated fashion."
but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;
I agree with the comments saying that Harry and Megan’s continuous, foul and, by the way, to this day unsubstantiated and unproven, personal attacks on the royal family have done far more to create sympathy and respect for the royals than for them. In fact Harry and Megan’s behaviour have made them look nasty, shady, unscrupulous and untrustworthy, and no amount of PR spin is going to undo that. The only thing that might save Harry and Meghan from being thoroughly disliked and or ignored (no doubt a worse fate for two attention junkies) by the majority of the public in the USA, Britain and the Commonwealth is for them to change their ways and become decent human beings who get on with genuinely doing some good in this world rather than spending their lives telling us that they are absolutely, perfectly, fabulous superheroes, and paying their “friends” and employees to do likewise . I won’t be holding my breath.
“Royal observers say there is a new strategy to remind people of the Prince ‘they loved.’”
“On Monday night, Prince Harry bounded into the WellChild Awards in London with a smile and set about making a fuss of the children who had gathered to meet him.
Picking up soft toys that had been thrown on the floor, calling the young winners “little legends” and crouching down among animal balloons, he seemed at home among the staff and beneficiaries of the charity he has supported as patron for 16 years.
He looked “very jolly”, one observer said, and a line of his speech in which he told parents of seriously ill children, “You’ve got this. And we’ve got you” earned the shouted response “we’ve got you too” from one member of the audience.
Unusually, though, the event was the seventh solo engagement the Duke of Sussex had undertaken in seven days.
The Duchess and their children did not travel to London, or to New York where the Prince gave five high profile speeches last week and appeared on Jimmy Fallon’s The Tonight Show.
Nor was the Duchess accompanying Harry when he arrived in Lesotho on Tuesday for what became his eighth solo appearance in as many days.
Particularly given the couple’s previous joint trips to Nigeria and Colombia in recent months, the Duke’s solo appearances have raised, perhaps inevitably, the question: Where’s Meghan?
For a couple who have described themselves as “salt and pepper” because they “always move together”, and bought their Montecito house because two “connected” palm trees were reminiscent of their relationship, their professional separation is new.
““There has been a separation [of their work] for a while,” notes PR strategist Mark Borkowski, who has followed coverage of the Sussexes closely. “It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to think there’s something going on. She has been doing the jam thing, the Martha Stewart play. He seems to be going back to basics.”
The “star power” they were expected to have together when they first left Britain, he says, “didn’t work” as hoped.
“They had to change the narrative. They need a venture that deflects from the failures. The charity aspect impresses upon everybody that he [Harry] does have value beyond the controversial stuff. It has the effect of separating them from the bad press and the failed content ideas.
“The punters still have time for Harry.”
Reports that Prince Harry is seeking a form of return to Britain have been emphatically denied by sources close to the Sussexes, who have pointed out how happy he is now with “amazing” new friends and projects on the horizon. He has “no interest” in returning to royal duties, they say.”
She's quietly working behind the scenes, putting the finishing touches on her Netflix cooking show, managing her investment portfolios, getting her ducks in a row to launch her billion dollar jam empire, going on the internet to find marginalised fashion brands that she can catapult into fame & success just by wearing like, an earring, taking power meetings in LA which she drives herself to or rides to in a limo, lunching with kindred powerful media moguls, planting her bottom firmly on that seat at the table which she earned, empowering toddlers to find their voices...so much to do, so little time.
So what is Harry Markle bleating about now?
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....''
Strong men defend and protect their beloved wives. Weak minded people insult such men because they have either never loved or have never been loved like that....
Very sad and much to ne pitied!!
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@beemee4416 Well maybe Rachel Ragland-Markle-Engelson-Mountbatten-Windsor will meet a strong man someday to reign her in as they have had 18 professional staff and 20 domestic staff leave, quit, exit, escape them in five years' time and there is now a thing out there called "The Sussex Survivor Club - SO TELLING
@@kansasrose2909 She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
.
See she wasn’t really depressed or pregnant, so that’s a win already for the hero Mega liar
OLD interview with PH and MM!!!!!????? why today?
Griefters. They’ve taken grifting to its most horrific level. Exploiting grief-stricken parents for their own censorship goals, their own money goals, their own narcissism goals. So disturbing.
The network to protect form online bullying is online which is where the bullying was.Though Meghan claimed that she didn't look at social media during her engagement interview with Harry.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???...
@@kansasrose2909 are any of her victims really ever just ok?,,,
The saddest thing about human invention is that eventually it will lead to our demise. 😢
Why is Jane telling her story back to her? So she couldn’t make up more lies. Meghan didn’t say it…Jane did. What a move.
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....,,,
Which lies are you referring to? You seem to have insider information and a deeply personal connection to what went on behind closed doors, in the UK.....in palaces..... Please enlighten us with your insider information....that you gleaned while sitting on the barcalounger on your front porch in Minnesota....
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!..
@@beemee4416 hi I’m a person with a brain who can read AMERICAN news sources and SEE her actions with my own eyes. Not everyone is ignorant to what’s going on in this world. It’s very easy to assume people are blind…no insider information needed to see both of them obviously virtue signaling for clout. No products have come out of any of their deals. Prove me wrong please.
Is there any person more obvious than Meghan markle? They remind me of John Lennon and Yoko Ono...
The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
..
How so? Please explain. You have clearly met her, know her personally and can share insightful, logical, and well reasoned statements backed by facts (not baseless opinons) that we would all love to hear! I have begun to wonder seriously about the general level of intelligence among the average person in your culture. It's actually deeply alarming!!
@@beemee4416 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@ocdman202 My God, what did she do to her first husband, and is really ok now???....
Probably was the phone… that Magian tried to commit suicide.
Definitely must have been the phone ☎️
My question ist, is there any Profesional person in that field present in that group of parents to support them?
Markle's act is tired.
Your limp intellectual ability and lame rhetoric borrowed from your deep readings and analysis of the National Inquirer is TIRED!
@@beemee4416 whatever she is paying you, you should ask for more, before she throws a stiletto at you...
@@kansasrose2909 The facts show that what she did to her first husband was so horrible, he barely recovered, let us hope that
she " SPARES' Harry that horrible behavior....'''
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@beemee4416 Your entire comment is false and unfounded, just like Meghan Markle's claims.
When someone is SUICIDAL while being PREGNANT it is take extremely SERIOUSLY.
how do you spend your holidays meghan?
Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"
I'm reassured to learn that they are not a "criminal organisation", although to be honest it wasn't a thought that had previously crossed my mind... And now i find my self pondering why they felt the need to use this particular phrase.
I haven’t looked at this woman since the Oprah interview, my goodness, how much ‘work’ has she done on her face? She looks so different !
Wounded Healers
Wounding Bullies. Ask the Sussex Survivor Club.
😜😜😜 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@mommapanda5736 do you mean DOA?..
@@ocdman202 I will never forget that when Prince Phillip was in hospital, Meghan and Harry continued with their disingenuous and lack of empathy Oprah interview.
When Prince Harry’s Grandfather was dying, they were so mean and childish. At this point, I knew they didn’t have the intelligence, understanding or statesmanship to be leaders on the world stage, and Meghan’s plan was always to drag Harry to California.
Emotionally mature adults would have had conversations and dealt with issues in private as a family. But Meghan Markle didn’t care; she was out for revenge, so she sat with Lie-Oprah and orchestrated a smear campaign to attack Harry’s family because she needed an excuse as to why they left; it had to be the Royal Family and not her who was chasing Hollywood fame and money. (BTW, Harry messed up and said to Oprah that his family were very welcoming to Meghan, “my father, my brother, Kate they were all very welcoming, better than I expected”. We know he got an earful after filming)
They told so many blatant lies and purposely gave answers without context so haters of the Royal Family would create false narratives. What was more sad is that Queen Elizabeth II had to deal with this unnecessary and unfair fallout while her beloved husband for 73 years was dying and then died. I will never forget the nasty hashtags and content the Sussex Squad posted after this; disgusting. Most of the British public supported Harry and Meghan leaving if it was what Harry wanted and made him happy, but after that disastrous interview, the public mood soon shifted to shock and anger. A lot of people were done with the two privileged, selfish brats.
Let’s be clear: Meghan didn’t have mental health issues, she couldn’t take the lack of control, she couldn’t sue every newspaper that printed nonsense but had some truth to it, wanted to merch her connection to the RF and she couldn’t handle the high level of scrutiny or deliver the standard of responsibility that was expected from her. Doria her mother was an alleged social worker but didn’t help her 🤨, and Harry had his therapist on speed dial but didn’t help her 🤨 he even said to Oprah that he didn’t tell his family because he felt ashamed. So if the family wasn’t informed, then they can’t be blamed for anything; plus she had plenty of access to help if she needed or wanted it. Her fabricated story has so many holes.
The worst part of that interview is how she lied about the colour of Archie’s skin, the question that didn’t happen the way her manipulative mind painted it out to be and the Duo told a complete different story when interviewed separately that lie-Oprah didn’t pushback on. If Harry had cared for his Grandparents, he would have never done that lying interview.
What was heartbreaking is that #PrincePhillip went to his grave thinking the world believed Meghan and Harry’s lies and didn’t get to the part where most of the world realised that Recollections May Vary.
When Prince Phillip died, I knew Meghan Markle was a narcissist. Harry was displaying tendencies as only a narcissistic person would continue attacking a family at this low point and have this level of lack of empathy or self awareness. They created an unnecessary media storm and then played the victim when they could have just gone and lived the private life they claimed they wanted with their millions of pounds in the bank.
Queen Elizabeth II had a broken heart, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex didn’t care. They continued to brief the media with lies, disinformation and grift off the titles the late Queen had gifted them.
I will never forget the lead-up to the late Duke of Edinburgh’s death and what followed; words can’t comprehend the level of narcissism, disrespect and disgusting behaviour displayed by two ungrateful, spoilt and cruel cosplaying humanitarians.
Rest in peace, Prince Phillip (World War II veteran) and thank you for your 70+ years of service to our country..
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity";;;
I actually thought I'd clicked on to a comedy channel then realised it is actually the duke and duchess 😮 got to laugh I mean the duke and duchess more like the fluke and fxx x it😅😅 harry and Meghan 😴😔
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!😜😜😜
@@mommapanda5736 but she claims " they are not a criminal organization" now we feel
we must dive deep into this so called "charity"...
@@ocdman202 Archewell Foundation: A Celebrity PR Machine Masquerading as Philanthropy ⚠‼
The Archewell Foundation’s so-called mission to create “positive change around the world” is a masterclass in vagueness, empty promises, and headline-grabbing PR moves that amount to little more than a glorified vanity project for Meghan Markle and Harry. When you peel back the buzzwords and jargon, it becomes glaringly obvious: Archewell is more about elevating their brand than helping the vulnerable.
Let’s begin with the staff-if you can even keep track of them. The Archewell Foundation has become notorious for its revolving door of executives and key employees. James Holt, Catherine St. Laurent, Richard Genow, and Andrew Meyer-none lasted long, with most leaving after short stints working what amounts to one-hour work weeks on paper. With high-profile names constantly jumping ship, the question arises: why can’t they retain top talent? The constant exodus speaks volumes about the chaotic mismanagement within the organization.
And let’s not forget their notorious “pledge” debacle. Much like Amber Heard’s infamous courtroom moment where she conflated a ‘pledge’ with an actual donation, Harry and Meghan seem to have adopted the same creative accounting. They throw around promises of grand initiatives and charitable contributions, but the follow-through? Practically non-existent. Announcing lofty donations and then conveniently failing to provide any real evidence of these funds reaching those in need has become their modus operandi. Where’s the accountability?
Their recent trip to Colombia to 'empower' youth with the “transformative power of arts and dance” is another perfect example of their smoke-and-mirrors philanthropy. Buzzwords like ‘amplification’ and ‘equitable impact’ are great for press releases, but where are the concrete results? Handing out a few drums and calling it a day is hardly the world-changing impact they claim to have. No measurable outcomes, no real commitment-just another PR stunt to make headlines and keep their brand relevant.
The Archewell Foundation’s financials paint a similarly damning picture. In 2021, they managed to rake in an impressive $13 million. By 2022, however, that figure nosedived to a paltry $2 million-a staggering $11 million drop in donations. If that doesn’t scream red flags, what does? According to CharityWatch’s CEO, Laurie Styron, it’s not uncommon for “celebrity passion projects” like Archewell to rely on a handful of wealthy donors to keep afloat. But even with that crutch, Archewell is struggling to stay relevant in the charity world.
The charity’s reluctance to provide financial transparency only adds fuel to the fire. Requests for audited financial statements? Ignored. Responses to inquiries about their finances? Non-existent. They claim to have a whistleblower policy, conflict of interest guidelines, and other corporate-sounding jargon-but how can anyone trust a foundation whose entire governance board consists of just Harry and Meghan, two individuals clearly more concerned with their public image than with making a real difference?
But perhaps most disturbing is their alignment with global political movements pushing censorship and controlling narratives under the guise of "tech responsibility." Archewell’s donations and grants align suspiciously with these movements, using causes like ‘climate change’ and ‘online harm prevention’ to stifle free speech and push their own political agendas. They exploit marginalized communities-veterans, youth, the elderly-not to truly empower them, but to further their own personal brand and gain social and political capital.;;;
P Diddys favorite guy.
She does not just throw tantrums at the Montecito Mansion, she throws shoes as well.... She throws sneakers at
the staff, high heels at her paid bots, and slippers at Harry!!
...
@@ocdman202 Meanwhile, American Riveeara Orcherd is Dead on Arrival, before Holiday shopping starts!!
@@mommapanda5736 do you mean DOA?
SAMANTHA'S BOTS AND MINIONS ARE BUSY BEES😅😅😅
@@mommapanda5736SAMANTHA'S BOTS AND MINIONS ARE BUSY BEES😅😅😅
Watching the haters self combust in the comments is beautiful