@@zxcvbnm4203 Do you? Does Ty for that matter? Just a reminder, but Ty Beard has never worked for a law firm other than his own. Straight out of law school he founded his own firm. The man literally has zero experience with how a law firm runs.
abandoned would imply he was ever really there at all. He was there for an easy grift, not to help Vic. IF he was he wouldn't have made things more difficult with the added drama, he would have called out Ty when he first acted like a fool, and he wouldn't have put their incompetence as a fault toward the judge.
@@zephirol4638 He literally said he knows shit about the case that would be covered under attorney client privilege in this clip. That's an outright admission to having provided Vic with legal council in a professional sense. For supposedly being a lawyer, this guy is absolute shit at choosing his words.
@@zephirol4638remember when Ty was acting like Trump bragging on Twitter and Threatened to Sue Marzgurl. Trust me I hate Marzarms as much as the next person here. But threatening her over Twitter was a very stupid and unprofessional of him.
@@tsalvlaxitov9594 The Joke/insult clearly went over your head. And you have no idea what is and isn't covered under ACP because you don't know what Vic was willing to disclose. I do agree with that last part though.
@@BohdanKaiba No doubt, the entire thing on both He and Nicks end was pure stupidity of the highest form. They took a slam dunk case and managed to dunk it in their own net.
@@snakebebop When Nick says there are things he knows about the case that would be covered by attorney client privilege he's clearly saying he provided Vic with legal council. That really was the dumbest possible thing to say in this clip.
@@tsalvlaxitov9594 I don't know what third world country you're from but attorney client privilege applies to communications for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. Vic is the one with the authority to disclose or waive the communication between the two, not Nick. So when you say something like this being "the dumbest possible thing to say in this clip". Are you sure you're not talking about yourself? Are you DSP?
Specializes in handling Nick's parent's estate (and probably his own), that's the important bit. Allegedly. Nick COULD have gave Vic better advice, such as taking on a law firm that specializes in defamation. Vic was likely too nice to say no to the family friend of the guy who raised all that money for him. Another example of Nick's fake libertarianism. Ty clearly wasn't the right choice but the nepotism was too strong. Nick is pro-free speech except when KF is talking about him, then he's glad they're getting attacked. Nick has no real principles.
@@debroofgreen wtf are you guys talking about? This is embarrassing. Nick recommended Ty because that was the lawyer Nick knew of that can practice in that state and believed he was a good fit. The only one he knew of. Vic could have gone elsewhere but didn't. Him being too nice to look elsewhere is a retarded thing to say. Imagine saying Ty wasn't the right guy for the case after the fact?
@snakebebop "It's your fault for being so nice and listening to me" doesn't really sound very good either. Just because Nick believed his families real estate lawyer would be a good fit doesn't mean that can't still be wrong, or bad advice to give someone. If I say "Oh yeah, for your fileserver for your bussiness you're gonna want to buy 67 iPads" because I only know a guy who sells iPads and also he's been managing my parents iPads for years, it's at least partially my fault when they inevitably fail, and I can't just say, "Well you shouldn't have listened to me!". That would be ridiculous on my part, especially if I cared about the company I fucked over.
@@Xvladin When did he say that in the clip? Nick recommended a lawyer he knows of that can practice in the state of Texas. Vic then went to talk to Ty and heard what strategy they would go with and decided to go with them. I guess it's a meme to always bring up Ty being his family's real estate agent? As if that's the nail in the coffin? Has Ty not dealt with multi-million dollar cases? Has he not won cases worth over a million? Do you think defamation cases are easy to win? Was the judge fair? Even in your silly analogy where you leave things out, you're still not at fault or to blame lmao. Using your example, if I had a friend and asked me if I knew anyone that can provide iPads for their file server and I mentioned the guy who's been managing my family's iPads. That friend of mine is going to do some research on this guy and see reviews, then maybe call for more info. As any normal person would when they're going to be spending thousands of dollars. But whatever happens in that business deal has nothing to do with me and saying otherwise is stupid.
If the very first word in your response isn't "no," then the answer is clearly "yes." And "accepting responsibility" is very easy to do when you don't have to pay 370k.
@@snakebebop yes. And Vic too, for being an impressionable idiot who let 2 incompetent rednecks convince him to go to court with their help and representation. Of these 3 clowns, Rekeita gained the very most at the expense of the others.
personally I disagree with calling him slippery it implies hes actually good at hiding his intentions or that he's got any capabilities or skills worth anything
Ty Beard was inept and his stupid game of “Let’s file at 2300 hours” and then filing late was incompetence at its finest. He should never have accepted a defamation case and the fact he is in charge of the Rekieta money is another reason he should have stayed clear. I hope it was a contingency case and Vic had no legal fees because if he did…Ty should write those off.
Nick shriveling about Ty when he had nothing but scathing vitriol and criticism for opposing counsel is so bitch-made. It's made worse when you consider that Ty hurt Vic in a way none of his accusers had been able to and has compounded his very public humiliation.
I'm amazed at how mealy-mouthed that explanation was from 1) someone who analyzes legal proceedings and 2) was not directly implicated by the question. Also, I'm amazed at how much this response was about himself considering he was neither the subject nor the predicate of the question.
Lick crusaded for Vic, raised money for Vic, encouraged Vic to sue, recommended his own family's trust lawyer to Vic... even that wet-brained akly knows he's implicated with this question; hence him trying to weasel out of it. Almost as funny as when he claimed "I don't KNOW Ty Beard".
Ty beard tried to play a gotcha game playing last minute submissions. Judge noticed that and torpedoed the case in favor of the defendant. Why is that so difficult to say outright
I think if Nick and Ty weren't yapping away about the case, the opposing council and Judge Chupp for months on end then Ty might have gotten a little more leeway than he was ultimately given. Chupp was looking for any excuse to dismiss this case because of the controversy surrounding it, controversy that Nick was fueling and inciting, and Ty handed Chupp exactly what he wanted on a silver platter. Nick is washing his hands of this but he's partially responsible for recommending a contract lawyer to a defamation case and then proceeding to do everything he could to make the judge look for the nearest exit ramp.
Judge Chupp was correct in dismissing the LOLsuit and when Vic appealed the dismissal, the 3 Appeal Judges agreed with Chupp on everything, expect on one thing, the fees that Vic must payback to those he foolish sued were too low. You have to laugh at the losers who believed that Chupp was in the wrong for dismissing the LOLsuit in the first place.
@@jlaking the only LOLs here are @ the KickVic idiot shills endlessly whining. Their side lost in the Court of Public Opinion as no sane person can stomach their idiocy, and Vic has plenty of support & is free to pursue new projects.
In my world being accountable means taking on some of the financial burden, if not all of it when you fuck up. Attornerys dont do that even though its literally their fault in a case that's actually winnable. And Vic wont get a re-do with another attorney nor am I sure he'd even want to double down and risk losing more.
@@Trevor-08 Yeah im aware, man to man thats the gayest shit you could do. Bail on commitments.. They pretend theyre with ya the whole way til that ship sinks and a helicopter air lifts them away to land again. lol
I like how every legal expert who wasn’t Beard and Reikata said the poor fucker had no chance to win that case. Then, when he loses, everyone is shocked that everyone besides the two people profiting off of said lawsuit were right.
You're missing the point entirely. Defamation cases are notoriously hard to win. No one is questioning that. The disaster in Vic's case was not thatbhe lost, but that he lost at the TCPA stage of the case, with fee shifting provisions putting him over $600k in the hole. Vic had enough to get past the TCPA and Ty blew it.
@randomcommenter1363 Vic had enough to get past TCPA. It's not a high bar. Whether he had enough the case is questionable, but getting past TCPA should have been a no-brainer. Ty's strategy was to slow-play his hand, and together with the notary mistake caused the loss at TCPA.
@randomcommenter1363 That's law twitter. Even if they are real lawyers they post on twitter all day instead of doing law. Their opinions aren't worth the bytes they are stored in.
Nick may not be a practicing lawyer any more, but he still uses weasel words like one. He's basically saying "I loaded the weapon and handed it to a guy after saying he should absolutely use it, but I am not at fault for him using it!"
Is Ty Beard at fault...? The straightforward answer is yes. He champions misguided arguments. A more detailed explanation would see me skirting the core issue for well over three minutes, delving into topics entirely unrelated to the case, all while ensuring I remain detached from the narrative, given my influence on Ty's chosen direction.
brother was on a show with him when he only had 10k subs back in 2018-19~ the message we took from that was "nick riketa doesnt know anything, hes a lolcow" absolutely called it right there and people are still catching up to us
He had to be superchatted into even talking about it, and even when he did he pretends that people were accusing him of being Vic's lawyer. This is something nick has always done from the very beginning, he will make a false claim about what others said and then hide behind his audience to enforce his false story.
Vic did not have a very good case to begin with, but it certainly wasn't helped by having a fundraising organizer more interested in establishing a streaming brand and legal counsel seemingly convinced that quips and claims on Twitter would, somehow, find their way into the docket by the power of memes. Over the course of the proceedings both Nick and Ty made claims that they couldn't in the end back up when in front of a judge, whether those were generalized notions of how the case would proceed or suggestions about their theory of the case. Though it was early on, the best still remains Nick suggesting that the defendants were burning thousands of dollars pointlessly by filing a TCPA motion to dismiss. Then that motion, requiring the lowest and simplest bar of evidence to clear, received no concrete response, resulting in dismissal and a judgement of over $500k against Vic. Everything Nick could have been wrong about, he was. Either by incompetence or deception. The people who donated to that fund should be enraged and demanding some kind of accounting of what was spent where and why.
Rial & Co. clearly spent plenty of money hiring shills to defend their sorry butts. Too bad they lost in the big in the Court of Public Opinion. Vic still has plenty of support whereas nobody believes lying clowns like Rial, Marchi and their equally pathetic associates.
LMAO I love that he's pretending that he didn't push Ty Beard's firm onto Vic Lasagna when he's close personal friends with Ty Beard and he's been a family friend for years. They are so close that Ty Beard held Rekieta's trustfund. I'd really appreciate it if you could find some of the old clips of them talking and stuff to add to these clips where he's trying to distance himself from this case, and act like he was not only the one to recommend Ty Beard but was actually one of the reasons Vic ended up going through with it, as he wasn't going to before the GoFundMe and Rekieta pressuring him as he had already raised the money (all of which went directly to Ty Beard's Law Firm for services, and doesn't even begin to pay for what he owes in court costs and fees to Funimation and the various VAs).
Buuuuuulllshitttt Vic just chose Ty Beard by dumb luck at random. It wasn’t you doing huge livestreams and sit downs with him showing your old dumb friend lawyer to Vic and telling him what a great case he had so you guys could grift him. Yeah right!!!
He's doing it now every time he streams, especially when he streams to locals. He couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. He's a lying liar who lies.
Haha. No. By "accept the responsibility" Ty meant that he feels super bad about it, but absolutely cannot pay Vic's way. He's got fat guy stuff to go do.
Hahaha "Damn it, we lost the case" hahahaha *loses the case*. If it was Ty Beards fault, then isnt it also at least somewhat Nicks fault for recomending him? Maybe the cope is that its Vics fault for listening to Nick?
I like when he asked himself the two questions at the end. That weren't even the original question that was asked.. He spoke for so long, he had to look back at the monitor to see what it even was 😂
the things that are nicks fault are somehow not nicks fault because "trust me bro" reminds me of the last 10 times nick messed up and absolutely got it wrong
Isn’t Nick’s channel built on legal analysis? Someone asked him an analytical question in regards to a legal case. Lot of hemming and hawing as a response
Re: Nick saying others ask: "Are you Vic's lawyer?": What a weasel-worded crock! ... Who the hell is actually trying to imply that - which was obviously NOT the case?!? Thing is - Nick - (pretty sure) - *you were the one who approached Vic about going to court* ...AND... *were the one to suggest Ty for representation* So - though you (Nick) did not represent Vic - you SHOULD bear some responsibility ... At least - acknowledge it!
Nick Rekieta created the Gofundme for Vic Mignogna. Ty Beard was one of the lawyers Nick Rekieta recommended to Vic. Nick was indirectly responsible for this shit-show. I wish he had just handed the money over to Vic and maybe suggest he go find a capable lawyer that had no ties to Nick at all.
Poor Vic, had to put his whole life in the hands of those two grifters. Maybe next time he’ll hire a “real” lawyer. Sad part is, Nick knew what he was doing from the start. The guy is such a shady slimy POS, he went a year grifting and telling people Vic was gonna win easily, and his viewers fell for it.
Just remember perfection call out nick when he was just using Vic to get views and money. Then nick rekieta and I stand with Vic UA-camrs when to kick Vic to get him ban off of UA-cam.
This almost equates to a MA or CNA giving diagnosing somebody for something that's out of the scope of practice. Never wise to accept lawyer advice for someone more betrothed to liquor than they are to their wives.
to think, the first sign all this would happen was nick proclaiming that webcomics arent real comics because "you can't hold a webcomic in your hands" we assumed he just thought that because he didnt know anything about comics or art, turns out that was just the beginning
How come him and Eric July can't seem to figure out where the camera is? What are they looking at and why are they avoiding even virtual eye contact with their audience?
I've forgiven Nick for his degeneracy cuz that's not going to change but there's more stuff going on in the comic book in these that's way more juice here than this
I notice you guys are continually trying to pin the blame on me or -my- -very- -good- -friend- Ty Beard who I have never met before this lawsuit. But I'll just say this one thing. Caveat emptor. Oh, and also no refunds. ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK!
Vic Mignogna’s Attorney Speaks Out, full interview w/ Ty Beard
ua-cam.com/video/6SUZWM048i0/v-deo.html
you are killing it with the topnotch clips, seriously
Is Ty at fault? *3 minutes of explanation for why Nick is not at fault*
Ty was too busy coming on Nick's show for internet clout to submit the evidence on time.
@@mariokarter13 Do u know how law firm work?
@@zxcvbnm4203 Do you? Does Ty for that matter? Just a reminder, but Ty Beard has never worked for a law firm other than his own. Straight out of law school he founded his own firm. The man literally has zero experience with how a law firm runs.
@@TRENCHESandTREADS It seems like u better, go to his firm and run it for him. Mr all knowing .🫡
important note: never trust nick
It appears that you don't need to be a practicing lawyer to be as slimy as the real deal.
hes a lawyer in spirit (hes a walking dumpster fire)
Man. Too bad Nick can't avoid alcohol the way he avoids responsibility
Responsibility for what?
@@snakebebop For not taking better care of you
@@catscratchd what?
@@snakebebop Not all eFathers are created equal. If you're right about something, it'll survive all the criticism. Take it easy
Grifting kickvic fans.
It’s alright but all of us knew.
He's saving his own ass because he gave vic bad advice and now Nick is abandoned him since he lost the case
abandoned would imply he was ever really there at all. He was there for an easy grift, not to help Vic. IF he was he wouldn't have made things more difficult with the added drama, he would have called out Ty when he first acted like a fool, and he wouldn't have put their incompetence as a fault toward the judge.
@@zephirol4638 He literally said he knows shit about the case that would be covered under attorney client privilege in this clip.
That's an outright admission to having provided Vic with legal council in a professional sense.
For supposedly being a lawyer, this guy is absolute shit at choosing his words.
@@zephirol4638remember when Ty was acting like Trump bragging on Twitter and Threatened to Sue Marzgurl. Trust me I hate Marzarms as much as the next person here. But threatening her over Twitter was a very stupid and unprofessional of him.
@@tsalvlaxitov9594 The Joke/insult clearly went over your head.
And you have no idea what is and isn't covered under ACP because you don't know what Vic was willing to disclose.
I do agree with that last part though.
@@BohdanKaiba No doubt, the entire thing on both He and Nicks end was pure stupidity of the highest form. They took a slam dunk case and managed to dunk it in their own net.
Nick is QUICKLY turning into DSP, this is Nick's version of "I did nothing wrong, I did everything correct"
"How am I toxic?"
You act as if Nick was Vic's lawyer
DSP is a literal saint compared to Nick.
@@snakebebop When Nick says there are things he knows about the case that would be covered by attorney client privilege he's clearly saying he provided Vic with legal council.
That really was the dumbest possible thing to say in this clip.
@@tsalvlaxitov9594 I don't know what third world country you're from but attorney client privilege applies to communications for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. Vic is the one with the authority to disclose or waive the communication between the two, not Nick.
So when you say something like this being "the dumbest possible thing to say in this clip". Are you sure you're not talking about yourself? Are you DSP?
Rekieta referred vic to an asset protection/corporate lawyer who was in charge of his trust fund. Yeah, it's on him.
When Vic was on Nick's show, Vic was clear, the only reason the lawsuit happened was because of Nick covering the situation
He's choosing words VERY cautiously here
"I'm not Vic's lawyer, but my talks with him are covered by attorney client privilege."
Are they though? 🧐 If it is personal business….yes. If it about Vic’s case…I would say doubtful.
Referring Ty Beard who specializes in estate law and is also Nick's family lawyer for a defamation case is not weird at all. 🤔
Specializes in handling Nick's parent's estate (and probably his own), that's the important bit. Allegedly. Nick COULD have gave Vic better advice, such as taking on a law firm that specializes in defamation. Vic was likely too nice to say no to the family friend of the guy who raised all that money for him. Another example of Nick's fake libertarianism. Ty clearly wasn't the right choice but the nepotism was too strong. Nick is pro-free speech except when KF is talking about him, then he's glad they're getting attacked. Nick has no real principles.
Lying about that was also very cool of Nick.
@@debroofgreen wtf are you guys talking about? This is embarrassing. Nick recommended Ty because that was the lawyer Nick knew of that can practice in that state and believed he was a good fit. The only one he knew of. Vic could have gone elsewhere but didn't. Him being too nice to look elsewhere is a retarded thing to say. Imagine saying Ty wasn't the right guy for the case after the fact?
@snakebebop "It's your fault for being so nice and listening to me" doesn't really sound very good either.
Just because Nick believed his families real estate lawyer would be a good fit doesn't mean that can't still be wrong, or bad advice to give someone.
If I say "Oh yeah, for your fileserver for your bussiness you're gonna want to buy 67 iPads" because I only know a guy who sells iPads and also he's been managing my parents iPads for years, it's at least partially my fault when they inevitably fail, and I can't just say, "Well you shouldn't have listened to me!".
That would be ridiculous on my part, especially if I cared about the company I fucked over.
@@Xvladin When did he say that in the clip? Nick recommended a lawyer he knows of that can practice in the state of Texas. Vic then went to talk to Ty and heard what strategy they would go with and decided to go with them. I guess it's a meme to always bring up Ty being his family's real estate agent? As if that's the nail in the coffin? Has Ty not dealt with multi-million dollar cases? Has he not won cases worth over a million? Do you think defamation cases are easy to win? Was the judge fair?
Even in your silly analogy where you leave things out, you're still not at fault or to blame lmao. Using your example, if I had a friend and asked me if I knew anyone that can provide iPads for their file server and I mentioned the guy who's been managing my family's iPads. That friend of mine is going to do some research on this guy and see reviews, then maybe call for more info. As any normal person would when they're going to be spending thousands of dollars. But whatever happens in that business deal has nothing to do with me and saying otherwise is stupid.
Slimy. That's all.
Slimy?! Um, you misspelled Immaculate. Thank you very much.
2:49 of nonsense yapping when a "YES" is all that was required.
If the very first word in your response isn't "no," then the answer is clearly "yes."
And "accepting responsibility" is very easy to do when you don't have to pay 370k.
If someone begins their statement with "Look...", prepare for BS coming your way.
Was Ty at fault?
I'M NOT VICS LAWYER. THIS IS SO WEIRD PEOPLE KEEP SAYING THIS. IT'S THIS SIMPLE. I'M NOT VICS LAWYER.
..k.
I mean, have you read the comments here? Theres a bunch of people saying Nick was at fault thinking he's to blame.
@@snakebebop he is no less to blame than ty beard and yet that wasn't the question he was responding to.
@@avarice33333 he is no less to blame that Ty? So you're saying Nick and Ty are equally to blame?
@@snakebebop yes. And Vic too, for being an impressionable idiot who let 2 incompetent rednecks convince him to go to court with their help and representation. Of these 3 clowns, Rekeita gained the very most at the expense of the others.
@@snakebebop yes
Such a slippery Grifter he is.
personally I disagree with calling him slippery
it implies hes actually good at hiding his intentions or that he's got any capabilities or skills worth anything
“Thanks for the money, dummies!”
Ty Beard was inept and his stupid game of “Let’s file at 2300 hours” and then filing late was incompetence at its finest. He should never have accepted a defamation case and the fact he is in charge of the Rekieta money is another reason he should have stayed clear. I hope it was a contingency case and Vic had no legal fees because if he did…Ty should write those off.
Guy still owe those he lost to some serious money. It was either 20k or 200k
Nick shriveling about Ty when he had nothing but scathing vitriol and criticism for opposing counsel is so bitch-made.
It's made worse when you consider that Ty hurt Vic in a way none of his accusers had been able to and has compounded his very public humiliation.
A real life example of why you should NEVER take legal advice from youtube lawyers
I'm amazed at how mealy-mouthed that explanation was from 1) someone who analyzes legal proceedings and 2) was not directly implicated by the question.
Also, I'm amazed at how much this response was about himself considering he was neither the subject nor the predicate of the question.
Have you seen the comments here? Theres a bunch of people saying hes responsible for this lul
Lick crusaded for Vic, raised money for Vic, encouraged Vic to sue, recommended his own family's trust lawyer to Vic... even that wet-brained akly knows he's implicated with this question; hence him trying to weasel out of it. Almost as funny as when he claimed "I don't KNOW Ty Beard".
yea, hes guilty
Sean: Ty's been nice to me, I don't want to throw him under the bus.
Nick: I will absolutely throw Ty under the bus.
Ty beard tried to play a gotcha game playing last minute submissions. Judge noticed that and torpedoed the case in favor of the defendant. Why is that so difficult to say outright
I think if Nick and Ty weren't yapping away about the case, the opposing council and Judge Chupp for months on end then Ty might have gotten a little more leeway than he was ultimately given. Chupp was looking for any excuse to dismiss this case because of the controversy surrounding it, controversy that Nick was fueling and inciting, and Ty handed Chupp exactly what he wanted on a silver platter.
Nick is washing his hands of this but he's partially responsible for recommending a contract lawyer to a defamation case and then proceeding to do everything he could to make the judge look for the nearest exit ramp.
How was Nick inciting and fueling this?
Judge Chupp was correct in dismissing the LOLsuit and when Vic appealed the dismissal, the 3 Appeal Judges agreed with Chupp on everything, expect on one thing, the fees that Vic must payback to those he foolish sued were too low.
You have to laugh at the losers who believed that Chupp was in the wrong for dismissing the LOLsuit in the first place.
@@jlaking the only LOLs here are @ the KickVic idiot shills endlessly whining. Their side lost in the Court of Public Opinion as no sane person can stomach their idiocy, and Vic has plenty of support & is free to pursue new projects.
Ty was too distracted coming on Nick's show for internet clout to submit the evidence on time.
everything I learn about them just makes it all so much worse
No one ever claimed you were Vic's lawyer. You just did him dirty so you could grift off his audience.
Ty was not a defamation lawyer. When Nick got hit with defamation charges, he got himself one.
He knows so little about Ty's practice despite referring him to Vic. That's pretty shitty
All Nick needed to know about Ty Beard to recommend him to Vic was that Ty is in charge of his trust fund.
He’s never beating those weasel allegations.
In my world being accountable means taking on some of the financial burden, if not all of it when you fuck up. Attornerys dont do that even though its literally their fault in a case that's actually winnable. And Vic wont get a re-do with another attorney nor am I sure he'd even want to double down and risk losing more.
You have a conscience, Nick, Ty and 99% of attorneys don't.
@@Trevor-08 Yeah im aware, man to man thats the gayest shit you could do. Bail on commitments.. They pretend theyre with ya the whole way til that ship sinks and a helicopter air lifts them away to land again. lol
I hope Vic will be ok. What happened to him was awful. He got used and mistreated by grifters from youtube and his ex-coworkers at funimation.
I like how every legal expert who wasn’t Beard and Reikata said the poor fucker had no chance to win that case. Then, when he loses, everyone is shocked that everyone besides the two people profiting off of said lawsuit were right.
You're missing the point entirely. Defamation cases are notoriously hard to win. No one is questioning that. The disaster in Vic's case was not thatbhe lost, but that he lost at the TCPA stage of the case, with fee shifting provisions putting him over $600k in the hole. Vic had enough to get past the TCPA and Ty blew it.
thats not true sir
I'm not a legal expert and I was also saying he had no chance, specifically because of ty beard and rektbeta
@randomcommenter1363 Vic had enough to get past TCPA. It's not a high bar. Whether he had enough the case is questionable, but getting past TCPA should have been a no-brainer. Ty's strategy was to slow-play his hand, and together with the notary mistake caused the loss at TCPA.
@randomcommenter1363 That's law twitter. Even if they are real lawyers they post on twitter all day instead of doing law. Their opinions aren't worth the bytes they are stored in.
*"Chief of Tomfoolery."*
That's the first time his ever been accurate.
Nick may not be a practicing lawyer any more, but he still uses weasel words like one. He's basically saying "I loaded the weapon and handed it to a guy after saying he should absolutely use it, but I am not at fault for him using it!"
Ty specializes in big business mergers and acquisitions. NOT defamation. He only took this case bc Nick suggested it.
he sounds incompetent just from his job description
Is Ty Beard at fault...? The straightforward answer is yes. He champions misguided arguments. A more detailed explanation would see me skirting the core issue for well over three minutes, delving into topics entirely unrelated to the case, all while ensuring I remain detached from the narrative, given my influence on Ty's chosen direction.
The whole not filing before the deadline and trying to pull a fast one with notarizing statements over the phone MIGHT have been a factor here.
@@DrAnac-qh5dc Many factors to consider, just like many drinks, cigars and photo bombs.
With all the lawyerly weasel words and phrasing, I can see why he's nonpracticing
Now, now, he had a 3am client the other day and had to cancel his show. Allegedly.
I Dont fuck with nick anymore hes one of the reasons why Vic lost the lawsuit he played all of us.
Weasel....
I love how nick is being shhted on by everybody.
brother was on a show with him when he only had 10k subs back in 2018-19~
the message we took from that was "nick riketa doesnt know anything, hes a lolcow"
absolutely called it right there and people are still catching up to us
He had to be superchatted into even talking about it, and even when he did he pretends that people were accusing him of being Vic's lawyer. This is something nick has always done from the very beginning, he will make a false claim about what others said and then hide behind his audience to enforce his false story.
Vic should have got a recommendation from an actual lawyer.
I believe he was told that a case like this was impossible to win, by two competent lawfirms.
Vic did not have a very good case to begin with, but it certainly wasn't helped by having a fundraising organizer more interested in establishing a streaming brand and legal counsel seemingly convinced that quips and claims on Twitter would, somehow, find their way into the docket by the power of memes.
Over the course of the proceedings both Nick and Ty made claims that they couldn't in the end back up when in front of a judge, whether those were generalized notions of how the case would proceed or suggestions about their theory of the case.
Though it was early on, the best still remains Nick suggesting that the defendants were burning thousands of dollars pointlessly by filing a TCPA motion to dismiss. Then that motion, requiring the lowest and simplest bar of evidence to clear, received no concrete response, resulting in dismissal and a judgement of over $500k against Vic.
Everything Nick could have been wrong about, he was. Either by incompetence or deception. The people who donated to that fund should be enraged and demanding some kind of accounting of what was spent where and why.
Rial & Co. clearly spent plenty of money hiring shills to defend their sorry butts. Too bad they lost in the big in the Court of Public Opinion. Vic still has plenty of support whereas nobody believes lying clowns like Rial, Marchi and their equally pathetic associates.
LMAO I love that he's pretending that he didn't push Ty Beard's firm onto Vic Lasagna when he's close personal friends with Ty Beard and he's been a family friend for years. They are so close that Ty Beard held Rekieta's trustfund.
I'd really appreciate it if you could find some of the old clips of them talking and stuff to add to these clips where he's trying to distance himself from this case, and act like he was not only the one to recommend Ty Beard but was actually one of the reasons Vic ended up going through with it, as he wasn't going to before the GoFundMe and Rekieta pressuring him as he had already raised the money (all of which went directly to Ty Beard's Law Firm for services, and doesn't even begin to pay for what he owes in court costs and fees to Funimation and the various VAs).
Buuuuuulllshitttt Vic just chose Ty Beard by dumb luck at random. It wasn’t you doing huge livestreams and sit downs with him showing your old dumb friend lawyer to Vic and telling him what a great case he had so you guys could grift him. Yeah right!!!
This is probably the most he's sounded like a lawyer in awhile.
Fingers on the face = Lying
He's doing it now every time he streams, especially when he streams to locals. He couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. He's a lying liar who lies.
If his lips are moving then he’s lying. It has become that bad
but... he does that constantly
😏
Accepted the responsibilty? So Ty is paying the over $300k?
Haha. No. By "accept the responsibility" Ty meant that he feels super bad about it, but absolutely cannot pay Vic's way. He's got fat guy stuff to go do.
Hahaha "Damn it, we lost the case" hahahaha *loses the case*.
If it was Ty Beards fault, then isnt it also at least somewhat Nicks fault for recomending him?
Maybe the cope is that its Vics fault for listening to Nick?
Yes. The rest of that is slimy lawyer talk.
Id say nick is at faukt for suggesting him
No refunds. Suffa vic
vic should have listened to swc
All those words when the answer is just "yes, Ty Beard is at fault."
I like when he asked himself the two questions at the end. That weren't even the original question that was asked.. He spoke for so long, he had to look back at the monitor to see what it even was 😂
Yes, yes he is. But so is Nick.
Nick is quick to comment on the failures of Heard's lawyers or the rittenhouse prosecution... why not here?
Only thing I took away from this is that it's Vic's fault for choosing Ty Beard and in no way is Nick's fault for recommending him.
Weeb Warrior holdovers will deny this fact TO THIS DAY
the things that are nicks fault are somehow not nicks fault because "trust me bro"
reminds me of the last 10 times nick messed up and absolutely got it wrong
Isn’t Nick’s channel built on legal analysis?
Someone asked him an analytical question in regards to a legal case.
Lot of hemming and hawing as a response
Such a slimy dude lol
Nick nooooo
The balldo emperor has no clothes
But he is drunk
"I just conned vic into hiring my family member to screw him over for $400k"
Why hasn't anyone AI'd Nick's face on the Matthew McConaughey character from "Dallas Buyers Club."
304s on the Whatever podcast display more accountability than Nick Rekieta.
You and Ty have wasted a LOT of peoples money!
Wow what a scummy lawyer
Scummy non-practicing lawyer on paper.
Acting like he had nothing to do with the case or ty beard being hired.😂😂
His alcohol stained finger prints are all over this horrific failure.
Re: Nick saying others ask: "Are you Vic's lawyer?":
What a weasel-worded crock! ... Who the hell is actually trying to imply that - which was obviously NOT the case?!?
Thing is - Nick - (pretty sure) - *you were the one who approached Vic about going to court* ...AND... *were the one to suggest Ty for representation*
So - though you (Nick) did not represent Vic - you SHOULD bear some responsibility ... At least - acknowledge it!
We will be in touch😂
Non practicing lawyer
Oh, Ty takes full responsibility? Cool. So he's gonna pay the 360,000 dollars then right guys?
right?.....
Nick Rekieta created the Gofundme for Vic Mignogna. Ty Beard was one of the lawyers Nick Rekieta recommended to Vic. Nick was indirectly responsible for this shit-show. I wish he had just handed the money over to Vic and maybe suggest he go find a capable lawyer that had no ties to Nick at all.
100% now, Vic has to pay for all of this shit and Vic did nothing wrong. He was taken advantage of by all these people, including Nick.
If he tells you that snow is white, he's lying.
YES
Poor Vic, had to put his whole life in the hands of those two grifters. Maybe next time he’ll hire a “real” lawyer. Sad part is, Nick knew what he was doing from the start. The guy is such a shady slimy POS, he went a year grifting and telling people Vic was gonna win easily, and his viewers fell for it.
Next time? Do you honestly think there is gonna be a next time?
Yes.
Lil' bro keeps yapping.
Sounds like he was yeah.
the correct answer is a simple Yes and Nick should be forced to give back his cut of the grift.
Just remember perfection call out nick when he was just using Vic to get views and money. Then nick rekieta and I stand with Vic UA-camrs when to kick Vic to get him ban off of UA-cam.
YES!
2:49 seconds of wasted time when he could have just said yes.
I dont know how anything is or works...
He is definitely a lawyer
Some people should just never touch the Internet.
This two minutes of sniveling is the most lawyering Nick has ever done.
You need to watch his prosecution of Eric D. July.
The hypocritical charlatan's will is strong with this one.
This almost equates to a MA or CNA giving diagnosing somebody for something that's out of the scope of practice.
Never wise to accept lawyer advice for someone more betrothed to liquor than they are to their wives.
Simple answer. Yes.
to think, the first sign all this would happen was nick proclaiming that webcomics arent real comics because "you can't hold a webcomic in your hands"
we assumed he just thought that because he didnt know anything about comics or art, turns out that was just the beginning
How come him and Eric July can't seem to figure out where the camera is? What are they looking at and why are they avoiding even virtual eye contact with their audience?
Their camera is facing one way and their monitor is facing another.
I’m still waiting at Vic Mignogna to complete his comeback plan to dubbing.
That seems to have fizzled out already. Only two shorts got dubbed and it took a whole year to get one(maybe both?)of them onto Amazon to no fanfare.
I've forgiven Nick for his degeneracy cuz that's not going to change but there's more stuff going on in the comic book in these that's way more juice here than this
as much as i loving laughing at mcballdo, i feel really bad for vic.
I notice you guys are continually trying to pin the blame on me or -my- -very- -good- -friend- Ty Beard who I have never met before this lawsuit. But I'll just say this one thing.
Caveat emptor.
Oh, and also no refunds. ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK! ACK!
That was one of my favorite moments: when Nick pulled the "I don't even KNOW Ty Beard!1!" card.