It’s not because people think it’s weak, it’s because gaijin always is like give us documents to proof the stats of a vehicle and we will implement them, however on this they straight up don’t care, no one would be mad if it would be a higher br, people just want it to be as accurate as possible, if not the burst mode the 5-6s manual load time
@@astro_wtthe issue is that they blatantly ignore public information about vehicles presented by the manufacturer and many other sources. Gaijin is extremely inconsistent with what documents they accept and which they don't despite them being perfectly valid. just watch spookston's vid on the EDF/LT
@@astro_wtyeah but with the PZH2000 there were a lot of legal documents. And the best thing is: for the reload speed that is proofen by videos they just said every video is sped up and the 3sek reload is just a lie
Why go so far? How come they made the PLZ05 which is at the same BR accurate to the point, with all the spall liners, autoloader and everything, but PzH2000 got nerfed to the ground despite all the evidence proving that it shouldn't be the way it is.
Here's everything bad about the PzH-2000: 1)Incorrect speed (should be 60kph,not 50) 2)Missing spall liners 3)Reload is not mechanized despite the charge rack being "mechanized" according to the game itself 4)Armor holes 5)The Charge Bustle Rack armor is not modeled 6)SAPHE missing 7)L15A1 missing (also the HE-VT version) 8)M107 and M107(PF) are not used IRL (at least not extensively) 9)Reload speed is ~13 seconds in the game, but is 6 seconds IRL with an option for a 3 second burst mode 10)The barrel DM is literally detached from the breech DM 11)Traverse Speed is incorrect 12)Missing Driver Thermals 13)The M107 has the same muzzle velocity of the M107 found on the M44,despite the different charge used and the barrel being several times longer 14) Ammunition compartment physically separate and blocked off from crew with some armor And there are other things that I'm sure forgot
ADD to 8.7-9.0 br adn make it realistic this not normal most modern arty play vs ww2 tanks...... + now gaijin removed thermal and stabilizator? how much u want gaijin to nerf most modern arty really this is hilarious....
0:12 Maus 0:36 Vickers Mk.1 1:10 T-54 1:35 M48A2 C 1:40 T-55AMD-1 1:45 Leopard 1 1:49 T-54 Last kill is another M48 You should make an appointment with your ophthalmologist.
Basically type-99 that lacks 14kg HE and longer reload but it has a laser rangefinder Fun fact, type-99 should in fact have a laser rangefinder, but gaijin either forgot or intentionally did not add that.
Im only mad about the 3 second reload not being implemented. The thermals and stabilizer aren't a necessity, but when the PzH 2000 is known for it's fast rate of fire and you don't implement it it really seems like you didn't bother looking at it's nuances and only worried about the design of the vehicle itself.
So giving it an 10s base reload time while giving vidar 6 seconds and thermals while also not providing high velocity on its shells despite having same 155mm L52 gun found on type99 and also not getting stuff like spall liners which the new chinese sph provides as a balancing mechanics is utter bullshit to me….all sph at its br bracket provided something different type99 provides hight velocity on its shells vidar provides reload and thermals and the new chinese sph provides spall liners what does phz provides…nothing
@ also according to me the best way to make it competitive is to give it the vidar treatment where the 3 shells in the ready rack will be reloaded in 3 to 4 seconds and after the ready rack is depleted it will take 10 seconds for each shell to be reloaded with this change it will finally be able to provide something unique to offer to players
yes now I see it would totally be overpowered if it was to get thermals a better reload is that will be on balanced if the just was some out of vehicle that was at least 90% compatible it that is sad oh wait may I introduce to you VIDAR
It’s not because people think it’s weak, it’s because gaijin always is like give us documents to proof the stats of a vehicle and we will implement them, however on this they straight up don’t care, no one would be mad if it would be a higher br, people just want it to be as accurate as possible, if not the burst mode the 5-6s manual load time
They are actually less likely to add stuff if documents are leaked
@@astro_wtthe issue is that they blatantly ignore public information about vehicles presented by the manufacturer and many other sources.
Gaijin is extremely inconsistent with what documents they accept and which they don't despite them being perfectly valid.
just watch spookston's vid on the EDF/LT
@@astro_wt Everything is made public by the manufacturer, no leaks necessary.... They refuse to accept the facts
@@astro_wtyeah but with the PZH2000 there were a lot of legal documents. And the best thing is: for the reload speed that is proofen by videos they just said every video is sped up and the 3sek reload is just a lie
Give this one the better reload and turet Rotation speed and put it at 8.0 , then Add a later one WITH a stabilazor and Thermal.
We will see what the devs decide to do
@astro_wt but then this Version would be fantasy I think.. without the Stab and thermal
@@astro_wtnothing as aways
Funny, Gaijin will nerf the PZH2000 into the fucking ground, but wont touch the Vidar(guess which one's a premium and nobody asked for)
its also premium for italy
@@erykjabonski1038 yes but its italy and italy cant be good
@@erykjabonski1038 that was only added after they realized they could make money, not actually benefit the game
Why go so far? How come they made the PLZ05 which is at the same BR accurate to the point, with all the spall liners, autoloader and everything, but PzH2000 got nerfed to the ground despite all the evidence proving that it shouldn't be the way it is.
Yeah
Here's everything bad about the PzH-2000:
1)Incorrect speed (should be 60kph,not 50)
2)Missing spall liners
3)Reload is not mechanized despite the charge rack being "mechanized" according to the game itself
4)Armor holes
5)The Charge Bustle Rack armor is not modeled
6)SAPHE missing
7)L15A1 missing (also the HE-VT version)
8)M107 and M107(PF) are not used IRL (at least not extensively)
9)Reload speed is ~13 seconds in the game, but is 6 seconds IRL with an option for a 3 second burst mode
10)The barrel DM is literally detached from the breech DM
11)Traverse Speed is incorrect
12)Missing Driver Thermals
13)The M107 has the same muzzle velocity of the M107 found on the M44,despite the different charge used and the barrel being several times longer
14) Ammunition compartment physically separate and blocked off from crew with some armor
And there are other things that I'm sure forgot
leave it to daddy gaijin to fuck it up.
Oh jeez
ADD to 8.7-9.0 br adn make it realistic this not normal most modern arty play vs ww2 tanks...... + now gaijin removed thermal and stabilizator? how much u want gaijin to nerf most modern arty really this is hilarious....
We will see what they wanna do
“SUCH A GOOD TANK” only hits AAs and light tanks lol
0:12 Maus
0:36 Vickers Mk.1
1:10 T-54
1:35 M48A2 C
1:40 T-55AMD-1
1:45 Leopard 1
1:49 T-54
Last kill is another M48
You should make an appointment with your ophthalmologist.
@ lmao I saw the heavier tanks just the vast majority were light
Maus, and many mediums were included
W comment frfr
@@astro_wt :3 I’ll take it as a compliment
Basically type-99 that lacks 14kg HE and longer reload but it has a laser rangefinder
Fun fact, type-99 should in fact have a laser rangefinder, but gaijin either forgot or intentionally did not add that.
Yeah
Im only mad about the 3 second reload not being implemented. The thermals and stabilizer aren't a necessity, but when the PzH 2000 is known for it's fast rate of fire and you don't implement it it really seems like you didn't bother looking at it's nuances and only worried about the design of the vehicle itself.
It only has the 3s reload for the first few shots
it has that for only the 3 rounds loaded in. Then you have to restock
So we can get vidar with thermals fast reload, but pzh 2000 cant?
Yup
astro can you make a video on how the Eurofighter is in CAS?
Yeah once I get to recording it
cant wait to grind the entire SPG line for it!
:3
Update: I am still sick
Rip
Nice video!
Your game looks nice! Could you share your postfx settings?
Ty, Full movie, Dx11, rein and contrast
Get kill with L3 at top tier update boi (day 2)
💀
So giving it an 10s base reload time while giving vidar 6 seconds and thermals while also not providing high velocity on its shells despite having same 155mm L52 gun found on type99 and also not getting stuff like spall liners which the new chinese sph provides as a balancing mechanics is utter bullshit to me….all sph at its br bracket provided something different type99 provides hight velocity on its shells vidar provides reload and thermals and the new chinese sph provides spall liners what does phz provides…nothing
Yeah
@ also according to me the best way to make it competitive is to give it the vidar treatment where the 3 shells in the ready rack will be reloaded in 3 to 4 seconds and after the ready rack is depleted it will take 10 seconds for each shell to be reloaded with this change it will finally be able to provide something unique to offer to players
yes now I see it would totally be overpowered if it was to get thermals a better reload is that will be on balanced if the just was some out of vehicle that was at least 90% compatible it that is sad oh wait may I introduce to you VIDAR
Yeah they are a bit inconsistent
Astro, will the danger zone update come out soon?
No
2 years late lad
these lrf howitzers sohould never be below 8.3 and the vidar 8.7 because the thermals THESE ARE DUMB AT 7.7
They kinda are yes
Can you pls make a video on rafale
Doing it rn
7.7? Im at 12.0
Yeah
Ok so it gets nerfed but bkan stays the same? Classic ignorant gaijin
Bkan is fine due to the turret and elevations limits
pookie :D
Pookie
copethunder
Frfr