How forensic anthropologists identify human remains

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @brahimadicko3690
    @brahimadicko3690 Рік тому +2

    very interesting topic for me ! thanks so much.

  • @WakeaThornton
    @WakeaThornton 3 місяці тому +1

    😮, I am amazed. Overwhelmed and is hungry for knowledge. 😢😮 And this is it, 🎉. I hold my mouth of knowing how could she be so comfortable with this subject. She is touching the skeletals. Oh wow.😮

  • @toastyknuckles892
    @toastyknuckles892 Рік тому +5

    people who turn their nose up at sociology tend to turn their nose up at science like this.

  • @Marinella-c8b
    @Marinella-c8b 6 днів тому

    Tradurre in italiano x favore

  • @1985malibuexpress
    @1985malibuexpress 5 місяців тому +1

    This "sub-field" of anthropology is changing. Identification by mere bone structure will soon no longer be as accurate due to the black/white mixture.

    • @adaliepizza537
      @adaliepizza537 5 місяців тому +6

      You don’t think it’s possible to understand mixed races?

    • @twistedarbiter
      @twistedarbiter 4 місяці тому +9

      this reeks of eugenics…

    • @baller84milw
      @baller84milw 4 місяці тому +1

      @@twistedarbiter People like you claim to "love science" until it tells you something that conflicts with your liberal worldview 🤦🏿‍♂

    • @twistedarbiter
      @twistedarbiter 4 місяці тому +2

      @@baller84milw yeah because identifying people from their bone structure by race wasn’t rooted in white supremacy

    • @baller84milw
      @baller84milw 4 місяці тому

      @@twistedarbiter It has nothing to do with either-so stop using cringey buzzwords you heard on NPR. Instead of learning from this-and accepting the science-you instead choose to make moral arguments against it which don't have anything to do with the underlying facts. Like I said-people like you claim to love science until it says something you don't like. You're just as bad as a religious zealot🤡