WHY Chelsea Sacked Tuchel & Was it DESERVED?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2022
- Thomas Tuchel was sacked in a controversial manner, with plenty of Chelsea supporters shocked and confused by the club’s decision. New ownership group, lead by Todd Boehly, have chose Graham Potter to replace Tuchel immediately. Why was Tuchel sacked? Did Tuchel Deserve to get sacked?
FOLLOW ME ON TIKTOK: / rabonatv
Follow me on TWITTER: / rabona_tv
Or INSTAGRAM if you like: / rabona.tv
Support the channel with Rabona TV merchandise: www.rabonatv.com/shop
MUSIC:
misterE - park bench
SoundCloud: / eswigz
/ @epierce95
Masked man - coupe_90
・ / masked-man-peace
・spoti.fi/2nQv1J1
・ / maskedman____
・ / not.core - Спорт
I will never fall in love with a manager again like i did with Tuchel . He stuck with us during our hardships and we just ditched him when he was in a bad phase . I'll support Potter and get behind him but the loss of Tuchel as our manager will sting me for a long time . He's forever engraved in Chelsea history and will always be loved and welcomed by Chelsea faithful and i hope wherever he goes he's happy and always winning . Our Deutscher Maestro ❤️
Nothing wrong in loving a manager like Tuchel tbh. Let's be honest. He was the first guy to have a genuine connection with us Chelsea fans since the 2nd coming of Jose Mourinho. We'll never forget what he did for us. He'll always be one of us forever. But definitely we need to move on. I hope Potter can do something well. I'm not expecting anything great from him but let's see how it goes
Tuchel was loyal to the club and that was his mistake. Every fan base loves a loyal coach or player but they will never reciprocate
Tuchel.... The one that got away
I agree with your sentiment that the sacking is a bit harsh on Tuchel, but at the end of the day it seems like a move to match Boehly's new vision rather than pure displeasure with Tuchel. Boehly's commitment to a long term vision is backed up by the 5 year deal he gave to Potter and the nearly quarter of a billion pounds he spent in August alone. If you're spending that sort of money of players, you have to be 100% behind the stewardship of the squad and given how Tuchel has handled his forwards over the past few seasons, I dont blame Boehly for doubting Tuchel going forward.
Exactly. In any other circumstance it would feel like a ridiculous sacking. And while it still feels harsh to not give Tuchel another chance, I can at least see the rationale behind Boehly & Clearlake's decision (down to many of the things you mentioned).
I don’t get the long term part if he spent quarter of a billion on players that the then manager wanted
What if those expensive players don’t fit the the new guy then that’s money wasted
Should’ve just asked him to resign if there was no future with him.
@@gaara4667 don’t just look at the money spent, look at the players they bought. All quality versatile players who should fit different play styles
Would love it if TT goes to Brighton and destroys it. This story will have the ending it and all of us deserve
Without any disrespect to Thomas Tuchel, he hasn't been a long term manager arguably anywhere he's managed. Boehly wants a long term vision and tuchel's career doesn't suggest tuchel is the one.
And moreover, Tuchel hasn't been able to make Pulisic, Ziyech, Werner, Lukaku, Havertz(probably),etc. It does feel like a sensible move from Chelsea.
Ultimately I believe the owners simply wanted a manager that they felt were aligned with their vision and work style, which unfortunately Tuchel did not embody.
Such a decision is actually not as rare as it might seem, when a club hires a new head coach, the head coach typically brings along a bunch of close colleagues - coaches, scouts, analysts, and clearly these people had to take the position of an existing employee. So a change in personnel after new management takes over is really not all that surprising or uncommon at any level.
Regarding the Patience Diego Simeone gets from Atletico Madrid the main reason I think is that A.M has a Champions League Spot virtually guaranteed every Season. In England 6 Teams are competing for 4 Champions League Spots while in Spain are usually 3. All this according to my humble opinion
I don't think the new owners wanted him to begin with. He's a great manager who has done wonders for the club, you make it work if he's doing well. But by not signing the players he wanted, signing other players he didn't want, and sacking him in only a few weeks of the season starting it's like they never planned to work with him in the first place
Did you miss the part where he didn't attend meeting and didn't want to get the player they owner wanted?
No clue how your conclusion is "the owner didn't want him",.
Sounds like he got himself fired by playing hard ball with the owner ... which was stupid.
@@Kiddingyoumust It's the Coaches part doing the Tactics and requiring Players for that specific Tactic. If the Owner interfere and wants instead of it other Players then here is where the Problems begin. For me it sounds like Owner wants to have the Spotlight. If good or bad we will see.
@@stephank.2727 The owner is the boss of the manager. Yes, some owners give carte-blanche to the manager to do whatever he wants, but if the owner calls a meeting the manager has to go. If the owner says he wants Player A, the manager has to explain why it's a bad idea and hopes the owner agrees.
You cannot go against your boss multiple times and hope everything will be fine, especially with the team struggling. He had no leverage. They tried to include him in the process, which every manager should want to be part of, but he didn't want to. I can understand a manager being mad for not being included, but this is the first I hear of one not taking part in meetings.
I wanted him to succeed, but this is all his fault..
@@Kiddingyoumustthis is not how soccer work but ok watch them ruin Chelsea
@@brandonjablasone7544 ?? Being that he lost his job, its seem pretty clear this is exactly how it works.
Ps: Chelsea doing bad wont break my heart.
443 as in.... 343 but he also included the goalie 😭😭😭
Them firing Tuchel I’ve come to accept that it wasn’t tactical or results based really, it was just the new owners asserting themselves and wanting their own guy. Problem is that they’ve mistreated him, their actions seem counterintuitive. You can’t spend £300m and give these long contracts to Auba, Koulibaly, Sterling and say it’s about the long term. You can’t go into the season without having the DOF in place and then fire the coach shortly after the window and then hire another coach to now give him the influence of who will now become Dof. Everything is just scatter shot.
Huge congratulations to Maurizio Sarri. Only Chelsea manager since 2003 who, despite not being an interim manager (like Hiddink and Benitez) managed to leave the club without getting sacked. An he won a Europa League in his only season at the club, in addition to finishing 3rd in the league and reaching a Carabao Cup final.
The problem is NOT sacking Tuchel....The problem is the TIMING of such important move...Why didn't Boehly sack him ahead of the new season So the manager can ask for specific players DURING The Important Summer Window ? For instance someone like Aubaymeyang agreed to join Chelsea mostly for Tuchel and how he enjoyed working with him at Dortmund a few years ago...Why also putting Brighton's own season in jeopardy by getting the one person that made them so good the past years at the start of September instead of the start of June, July or even August ? That's my big issue here....And like him or not Tuchel came into a Chelsea team which was in total shambles in Jan '21 and turned them into not only a Top 4 Side BUT Also WON A very competitive Champions League where he got to ouminded and outcoach both Real Madrid (Zidane) & Manchester City (Guardiola) in what was one of the most brillant comeback stories ever...
I don't think Potter should have taken the job. He should have stayed with Brighton to finish out the season at least and the project he's been working on all this time. Also like you mentioned there's matches every 3 games with a squad he has to now figure out on the fly. I feel bad for Brighton since they were finally seeing things pay off hopefully this doesn't make them nose dive
As a Chelsea fan I love tuchel and I believe whoever now becomes manager will be downgraded. Tuchel is one of the best but it is also true all players are playing out of their positions. No skills development and the same wing based playing nothing new. Now I just wish owners know what are they doing.
Potter was confirmed yesterday
@@MagicalBikeRide I wish Chelsea have a proper roadmap
it was right decision to sack tuchel the football was terrible
@@nathanielreid5626 I totally agree with you but 5 more games will be perfect for both parties.
@@mffmff2719 that’s what The club is trying to do. The long term contract I believe says it all
Tuchel is loved by every fan I know, the pressure is now on the owners to prove this wasn't just a knee-jerk reaction and it will be beneficial in the long term. One thing is for certain, the man loved the club and should not have been disposed of so mercilessly
Its sad when you consider how tuchel hasn’t been able to mold this squad at all since his arrival. A handful of players were signed before he joined & since then he seems to have been unable to get the players he wants & also get rid of the players he doesn’t. It seems like a man who is coaching someone else’s team. For a while it worked cause he’s a brilliant tactician but he can only do so much with the lack of quality he inherited.
Tuchel didn’t want to mold a squad though. He was unhappy with how much the owners were consulting him about the transfer market. He just wants to coach the team he is given. Very different from most managers. Boehly wanted a very hands on manager and Tuchel wasn’t that.
Yep and Potter is about to inherit a lot of these players and is gonna find similar issues. Not only is the squad lacking quality in the attacking areas, it’s the fact that maybe aside from Sterling there isn’t a single attacker who is a consistent goal threat which says a lot.
@@newrecruit100 facts bring lampard back so we can see mount score from midfield 🔥
@@newrecruit100 Maybe because the system TT put in place doesnt work for the attackers? When your wingbacks are scoring most of the goals - why even have a front 3? just do a 5-5 and call it a day.
@@khaderach19 people blame the system without ever detailing reasons. Are a couple of players where it doesn’t suit? Yeah sure but trust me it’s not because y’all believe we lack numbers in attack lol
Tuchel being sacked and Graham Potter replacing him shows that Chelsea’s new owners wanna take a more long term approach instead of Abramavich’s chop and change manager win at all cost approach
Yeah man. It simultaneously feels harsh for Tuchel in some ways, while Potter is also not a bad move for the long-term. I think both things can be true at the same time.
@@RabonaTV only for him to suffer like Moyes and get sacked in 2 years 😔
The timing so fucking off man.
that logic makes no sense to me. If they want a more long term approach they couldve stuck with Tuchel and give him time to fix the issues. If anything the sacking of Tuchel after a still somewhat understandable stretch of underwhelming performances shows that if you (as a manager) underperform with the team only for a littel while youre out. You really think if the performance remains like this under Potter or even worses he wont be sacked as quickly as Tuchel?
@@thetruth9803 Tuchel is not a good man manager and does not give many chances to youth
It's hard to say to for sure. You can make arguments for both. I thought Thomas tuchel should have had more time to turn things around given what he's achieved thus far. But on the flip side I haven't see my team play well for 5 to 6 months and the performances have been dreadful. With the way the attack has stagnated with no signs of improving as well as him losing the dressing room this was always going to be the most likely outcome
and consider how fast Tod deals with Potter, I think they already have an agreement during the summer.
@@Andychiu845 yeah he was pretty much a Deadman walking wasn't he?
@@kevinnguyen4602 not necessarily. Initial indications were they wanted to stick with Tuchel, but as time went on, they realised Tuchel was a stubborn man who refused to take on new ideas, or engage with the heirachy. And to compound that, he had lost the changing room, his team selections were baffling, and he showed little interest in giving young players a fair chance- Gilmour, Ampadu, Colwill, Chalobah, and Hudson Odoi. Did the same with Tammy Abraham who is now tearing it up with Roma in Italy.
@@ollymark11651100 percent they wanted this to work but refusing to adjust his system playing guys out of position and a squad that clearly didn't want to play for him anymore they decided to take action
Great video, as a Chelsea/TT fan, I thank you
I'm glad I'm not a Chelsea fan, I would never be able to deal with the manager turnover rate that they have😂🤣
But Chelsea are very successful in that way.
That worked for Chelsea under Abramovich though. Whether you like that approach or not, they have won 2 UCLs and many PL titles through it.
@@Timliu92 yes but for me they never give managers a proper chance to fix the problems, so then the new guy has to come in and deal with those first and foremost. Then after theyve had a decent spell where theyve won a trophy or two, they hit a rough patch and get sacked. Wash rinse repeat. Plus given that they have new owners (owners who backed Tuchel to the tune of 250 million spent this summer) I'd have thought Tuchel would have a lot more time
@@colindavis7197 still works though, most successful epl club of the century
@@Timliu92 how many PL-Titles, Mr ? xDD
No good trying, playing players out of position is fraught with problems, it upsest players, Lukaku and Werner. Sticking with Mendy who has been woeful this season was another mistake, Kepa should have been in the team ages ago...
As an American who watches baseball I can tell you as I’ve told other Chelsea fans. The Dodgers (Boehly owned) pride themselves on stability and foundation. They are constantly the top team because they have a consistent yearly supply of youth to support a superstar cast. I think TT was never going to be the right man to change Chelsea into a youth factory whereas Potter will support the idea. I also agree that even though the sack on TT was quick I don’t think we will have a situation similar to Roman because Boehly is going to follow a plan over multiple years to bring us up to the level of City.
i'm actually really excited to see Chelsea actually utilizing their youth system, seeing as it's one of, if not the best in the league, and they consistently binned them off or let them rot on the bench under Abramovich. Obviously it worked out for Abramovich in some ways, but one wonders if they could be even more successful this way, and Abramovich's regime felt very cut-throat and, for a neutral, not so likeable because of their approach to throw money at anything and then ruthlessly cut off who isn't an instant success, often harshly dismissing managers and players alike.
Of current first-team regulars, Mount, Reece-James, Chalobah, Loftus-Cheek, Gallagher, and Broja came through the Chelsea academy. City has Foden. Nobody knows what Potter will do.
@@waterboys3001 only the first 4 regularly play, still unknown how Gallagher and Broja will do, and you could argue that, were it not for the transfer ban, Mount, James and Chalobah could have been binned off too, or left to warm the bench, and replaced with proven, ready made big names.
TT would be perfect to develop young talent.
Just look at his Dortmund stint, the most expensive and best youth players were his doing. There is yet a manager to be found that can produce the same results from an unreliable and dodgy mfer like Ousmane Dembele.
He would have been perfect for a long, reliable system looking into the future.
And if your replacement is Potter..... maybe just wait until winter and search for a proper manager while the WC is ongoing.
The only problem with TT is that he's a weird man. Somewhat of a genius problem (I wouldn't call him a genius (he's one of the greatest managers ATM tho) but it's a thing you can see with Geniuses).
But when you win the CL, solely because your new Manager made the team putpla itself majorly, you don't bin him for the next best, not-foreign manager.
@@gandalf_thegrey I watched every game when he was at Dortmund and while he did play some youth they were only played Because that’s how Dortmund are run you don’t just show up at dortmund and sign older players. In his past 2 stints at Chelsea and PSG he has let various top talents walk because he refused to play them. So really your entire point is invalid.
Great effort!
Thank you for the video Adrian. I didn't feel like thinking about Tuchels sacking and here you are doing that for us, appreciate it :)
Excellent video Adrian.
Fantastic video. I think you've said everything that needed to be said.
Love this channel!
I've watched a lot of Videos on this Situation Your video is the only that makes sense 🤝
The only thing that’s odd about the sacking is allowing so many transfers by him
Absolutely exquisite video as always 🙏
Imagine the scenes if Potter get them relegated
Nice one 🍻
They should have brought in a Director of Football and let Tuchel be a coach for me, at least till international break he is very impressive tactically when he can focus on just tactics.
I asked myself why spent a 250 mil for one manager and then sack the day after the window but the reports seems to tell that Boehly trusted Tuchel to improve maybe not immediately.But the 6 games that we played we can easily say all of them were a struggle we won some matches by the skin of our teeth.So I get its harsh but Potter is definitely someone to look forward to.
the signings they have made are all good or excellent anyway, and Potter uses a similar approach to Tuchel, all while also being tactically flexible, so I think it's not as big a deal that the players aren't ones who he brought in as some people make.
@@maciejbala477 oh yeah I agree with you on that.Its the timing of this which is making it so messy because if Tuchel didn't suit their ideology then they should have pulled the trigger in the summer but the signings are good.
@@robibarua8568 yeah, but they were in two minds, wanted to go through with him as manager, maybe thought if they signed the right players he'll come good again, because he did win the CL with them after all, he was successful in the past. But the results showed everything was still going badly, and he didn't always cooperate with them so well either. I can see why they did it the way they did
@@maciejbala477 yeah ofc I can see why they sacked him but none the less they did it in a messy way.
@@robibarua8568 i think probably would happen much smoother if not the whole Abramovich situation, and the instability coming with the new ownership, but I agree,
He should have been given longer, even if you have a mediocre season it's better for stability. I finally thought we had a long term coach who fits with the club and then as soon as the new owner comes in it all falls apart
It's not uncommon for new owners to pick their own man....
@@greg2502yeah but was it necessary? Tuchel stabilised our club from the shambles that Lampard left behind and bought us back into Finals
But why buy him the players he wanted, including a transfer deadline day panic buy like Aubameyang only to sack the manager the following week? It doesn't make sense in the least and seems like the owners have no idea what they're doing.
What's the music being played at 6:20 ?
Regardless of the decision etc, Let's be real, we DONT KNOW Tuchels point of view. As you said this was reported by "journalists". I won't believe a word about his POV unless I hear from his mouth.
Boehly clearly has a plan. I believe he wanted Potter from the start but sacking Tuchel as soon as he came would have been met with outrage from supporters. He backed Tuchel but when the season started and results were bad, he used it as an excuse to sack him. An owner without a plan doesn’t give a 5 year contract to a manager like Graham potter if he doesn’t see the long term future of the club.
Well said!
Tuchel was done so dirty by PSG and chelsea this should be a warning sign for potential coaches, players and fans
Been waiting for this. I wanted your thoughts on how our former mgr was sacked.
I still think tuchel was done dirty but I will support Potter.
Makes 100% sense. Nothing to do with “deserved”, business is business.
I apologise previous comments as never wrote full context of information and sources was off the cuff so to speak , never mind keep up the good work
No problem at all John! Campos joining Chelsea would be an incredible signing, should it happen. His track record is indisputable (I did a video on him joining PSG for anyone unaware of who he is and what he does).
I like Tuchel, I think he'll have no shortage of suitors and will get another top job. The results were there in 2021 but 2022 has been kind of mediocre as you mentioned. Chelsea ended 21-22 season in poor form and lost to teams like Brentford and Everton who were in relegation scraps. If the season was a few weeks longer they likely would have ceded the 3rd spot to Spurs or Arsenal. Combine that with the up and down start to this season and the loss to Dinamo Zagreb was the final straw.
A sizable failure during his time was the attack. A coach needs to create the best atmosphere for his strikers to succeed and he didn't do that. The Lukaku situation was a major negative during his time at Chelsea. I'm 100% sure you can't blame Lukaku's struggles exclusively on Tuchel but he needed to get more out of him, one way or another. Werner and Pulisic were capable of more than what they produced, as well. Again, it's hard to completely blame Tuchel for the attacking woes, the players needed to step up and score with the chances they've got.
The defence got worse further into his tenure as well. Losing Rudiger and Christensen is tough. I'm not sold on Koulibaly and Fofana. The former makes too many mistakes and the latter... well remember the last time a big club spent big money to buy a Leicester defender (Maguire?)
I don't think it was deserved. I figure you either say at the end of last season we have a seperate plan we wanta new manager and new structure etc and you bring in potter to handle pre season and get players that will be part of the future OR you give tuchel a truncated spending at let him know this is his last season if he wants to stay because we are taking the club in a new direction from next season onwards .
The postponement of this weekends fixtures as a result of the queens death could help Potter and Chelsea to get settled and start that work on the training ground.
Then they have a home champions league match which they will be big favourites to win. If they do pick up the three points, then the confidence will grow.
You would think that they would have waited longer to see if the team turned things around. They hadn't buried themselves yet. Also,you'd think they might have waited till year's end to snare Potter. However, the cost of not making the top five and getting eliminated in the group stage of Champions' League does force your hand somewhat.
Hi. Is it Possible to make a video on the latest lawsuit barca going to file on athletico regarding griezman on his loan deal? I dont understand what's happening and you're the best at explaining this sort of stuffs
I remember how chelsea fans made a tifo for tuchel and tuchels reaction to it was heart warming
The sacking is harsh and ridiculous, Di Matteo sacking was fine bcoz we were out of group stage but under Tuchel we reached 5 finals in 1.5 yrs
Also his behaviour during the Tottenham game suggest he is having a brake down, as you said its nothing inparticular but they all add up
Like most others, Tuchel being dismissed was a shock in the moment - but I cannot say it is all that surprising in hindsight. This situation reminds me a lot of the Pochettino sacking at Spurs. Sure, previous success should have probably given each manager more time to turn things around, but both clubs had been going through a period of bad form that stretched for nearly a year - for Poch the CL run paved over the cracks while Tuchel had the cups.
couldnt agree more.
honestly, I think Poc lost the players respect when he specifically stated he "cant rely on sentiment" when choosing who to play in the final vs LFC, then did exactly that by playing a still recovering Kane over Moura who *literally* got them in the final.
I noticed a HUGE drop in the team morale as a whole when next season started and it showed in the results.
if Poc had played Moura, chances are good Spurs would have won that match considering how poorly LFC showed.
This will back fire
I feel, just like Newcastle got a new manager in after the change in ownership (but far more justified then Chelsea's), the second new owners come in they want to move away from the past owners as they want it to be their club so the second they are given a reason to sack the manager they will. Any success with Tuchel would not quite be theirs but with a manager they picked it would.
Underrated Channel
"Boehly and his team lean heavily on analytics". Oh, so they're idiots then.
Honestly, regardless of Boehly’s plans, I’m not too unhappy with Tuchel’s sacking. That champions league run was special, but so was Leicester’s title win. Sometimes there are lightning in a bottle times in football but clearly that magic didn’t last. We have been out of form since Chilwell tore his ACL. I appreciate Tuchel sticking by us through the sanctions, but what matters are the results on the pitch. Potter’s Brighton are 3 points ahead of us with no major names. The opportunity to get him is one I wouldn’t pass up and I’m optimistic. I understand why a lot of Chelsea fans adore Tuchel, and I agree, this was not the way to sack him but I think it was better to rip the bandaid now. Who knows where we would be in December without a major change.
Chelsea got somewhat lucky with the queen's death they get an extra weekend to figure out their stuff with Potter
As an American, the LA Dodgers (Boehly's MLB team) are known for giving their managers time and spending the money on the best players. Tuchel was hard done, but Chelsea fans just need to be patient and have faith.
I'm a new subscriber, based purely on this articulate and nuanced evaluation.
If all videos are of this calibre l shall be mightily happy.
There really is an awful lot of dross out there in TouToob land.
And yes, as a long-term Chelsea fan Tuchel had to go.
9:15 Lol that supposed 'drop off' doesn't look anything like a drop off if you just look at the numbers tho? :D Just 'goals against' increased dramatically, while clean sheets nearly halved.
Boehly knew he was hiring Potter for awhile now and he knew Potter would need time and therefore likely not get top 4 right away. Especially had he not spent this window, top 4 would’ve been borderline impossible. It was better to spend this window while having UCL football to offer than it would be to wait until next summer and not have that available. Would they really be able to get better players than they got this window without UCL football?
Their gonna regret this when potter has them in 5th for 2 SEASONS in a row but still has a £60M contract funny how sacking tuchel and getting potter could add up to them losing rougly around £100M + £300M summer spend big big yikes
Hi, your opinion for jonathan Osorio, the canadian midfielder. They say Panathinaikos want him Is he good?
I wish Ppl would stop saying these players were bought for tuchel , they wee young prospects for the future Tuchel did not get his main targets because bohely had already decided he was gone
My rational side says it is understandable insofar as there is a new owner who may simply follow a different vision and strategy and getting a fitting trainer is an important part in this regard.
My irrational side says that TT stood by the club when everything seemed to crumble and not only kept this going strongly when many less talented trainers would have ended midtable, but also won (and nearly won) siilverware. Plus he represented the club with dignity and navigated through the tough times. This irrational side would be happy if the team finished outside the top six due to the sacking.
That deal between Brighton and Chelsea was done ages ago. The fact Brighton let Graham Potter go without no fuss mean they already have a ready made replacement set. Tuchel, maybe.....???
i think for Boehly Tuchel is just a manager until he got the manager he wants to work a project with. And when he thinks Potter is the man then off Tuchel goes
Look I’m American, and baseball people, from what I’ve seen, don’t know left from right most of the time. I’m very very scared for what’s to come of the club
Are you doing a Graham Potter video?
Tuchel is a good coach. There must be another reason apart from football that he was sacked. He wasn't given a fair chance.
Spot on decision. No headway for TT at Chelsea
Chelsea wanted a yes man good for Tuchel sticking to his principles
That's ok.
New owner's last name sounds quite intimidating tbf...
I'm afraid the new owner will not be as good as abramovich
I get not wanting to be incredibly hands on within the club but I do find it weird not wanting to be part of transfers. I guess Tuchel thinks he can turn any group of players into an amazing squad regardless of the quality of a player🤷♂️ I feel like it would only make coaching more difficult as there are definitely different levels of quality within professional football. Imagine the owners decide to buy some of the worst players around. What then? Could tuchel really turn them great? Idk 🤷♂️ as I said I think it’s a weird ideology
Board's fault. Shoulda hired a director of football first
If its true that they suggested that 4-4-3 thing to tuchel i can understand tuchel. That guy is 100% professional and
passion. But if he miss that i think hes not easy to handle, like in Dortmund at the end. There should be no "owners"
of a football club.
I think that another club would be in for Potter, if Chelsea had not moved for him. I think that Tuchel was not a Boehly man, unlike Abramovich. And the Chelsea strikers have been woeful this season.
Their are/were 3 top managers in the PL.. now there are 2 left... The Liverpool owners made the same mistake in the beginning by hiring Roger's.. They learned the hard way . I think the new Chelsea owners have chosen that way.. Cool.. they must have money to spunk
It feels wrong and right at the same time.
I get the whole rationale but if that’s really the case, why do it after the transfer window and a whole bunch of signings supposedly backing him
Though I suppose they aren’t all his wanted signings
It is difficult to understand the US managerial style for a German and vice versa. Very different ones. Can Tuchel smile?
he lasted only 18 days longer than lampard. that's wild.
Its crazy, how understanding you are for the american, in terms of football at least, unprofessional owner. Nearly no criticism at all !!!
It had to happen
managers now axed after a few games its a complete joke no matter how you try and sugar coat it
Tuchel was a victim to circumstance.
I'm sure the board didn't hate him but it looked like only the veteran players like Thiago and Azpillicueta were left that trusted tuchel, the test seemed to give up like a bunch of children.
It's sort of kinda like Solskjaer? He lost the dressing room as well albeit because the squad were literal manchildren. This one was probably just due to luck.
I'm sure Chelsea will be back to sacking managers again soon, it's a tradition.
Lack of loyalty but that's how Chelsea roll. That's the same way he got his job (sacking of a Chelsea legend who helped Chelsea rebuild after transfer ban), and the same way is how he left (won them a CL and stuck with them under the Chelsea Russia ban). I think as long as Chelsea can replace Mendy, the same way they replaced Kepa they will achieve success.
The German Maestro need more time to adjust the new players my own opinion Boehly try tell to Tomas Tuchel with players need to line up and Tuchel telling to Biehly don't pit your nose in my business. The same problem Mauriño had with Abranovic .
This is such a weird situation. On one hand it seems cruel to sack tuchel given all he’s done, had to go through and the loyalty he showed the club. On the other hand, rather than taking it in stride, he found every reason to complain in public and iced out a large portion of the squad which led to a terrible environment. Left with these two things, it feels awful he was let go but also he should’ve just kept quiet, got to work for the year and hoped next summer would’ve been better as far as recruiting goes. Can’t say I blame boehly ultimately. 🤷♂️
Kind of sad to see him go with this type of fashion but, he to us, will always be a legend, a di matteo 2.0… now we will have to get behind potter to look forward #KTBFFH
Honestly I think this is the worst decision chelsea made in a while.
People keep focusing on the 250+ mill Chelsea spent. It is important to know that none of the players are bad signings. Some might be over priced. But at the end of the day, it won’t hurt Chelsea in the future
Graham will have plenty of time to implement his ideas to the squad.
No time for implementation, hit the ground running,.🤷🤷🤷
Will he though? Fixtures are coming thick and fast. The squad is bloated too.
I am not a Chelsea fan, but Tuchel did well. Champions league trophy is not a small achievement. But it wouldn't be the first time Chelsea sacks a good coach for not satisfying the management.
It was definitely not deserving but it was the way forward
Well no EPL Matches this weekend so we won't see Potters Debut yet.
If Tuchel remained as Manager of Chelsea F.C things could go only downhill. There were serious problems in the dressing room and probably Chelsea would have another "Mourinho Season" (2015-2016). The new Chelsea owners tried to salvage the situation by firing him. The Biggest CRIME is was the selling of Billy Gilmour (and without a buyback clause, WHY???) we will be crying for this Player like we still do for Kevin De Bruyne you'll see.
Great video and I agree that Tuchel was sacked for mostly non futbol reasons - IMO he sealed his fate when he argued with Boehly about Cristiano - Chelsea trusted their manager but then watch as they struggle to score goals
btw, i see that you are a fan of the wrong club in Lisboa - Please reach out to me when you are ready to accept help - It is a mistake, but it's a fixable mistake 🦁
Thank You, Super Tommy Tuchel 💙
New owners treatment of Tuchel was disgraceful. He stuck by us during one of the most tumultuous periods of our clubs history.
Asked to answer unfair questions about war, politics and morality, but he made us proud with how he was represented the badge.
This one will sting for a while but I hope he and his staff finds success and happiness at their next post. Danke schön.
Now, we look ahead to the next chapter under Potter and make some new memories.
Tuchel lost it. Started already with the handshake with Conte and frustational behavior after that. He lost credibility as a manager.