F-35 DAS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • More about the F-35 DAS: More at www.northropgru...
    Northrop Grumman has developed the only 360 degree, spherical situational awareness system in the electro-optical distributed aperture system (DAS). The F-35 DAS surrounds the aircraft with a protective sphere of situational awareness. It warns the pilot of incoming aircraft and missile threats as well as providing day/night vision, fire control capability and precision tracking of wingmen/friendly aircraft for tactical maneuvering.
    Designated the AN/AAQ-37 and comprising six electro-optical sensors, the full EO DAS will enhance the F-35's survivability and operational effectiveness by warning the pilot of incoming aircraft and missile threats, providing day/night vision and supporting the navigation function of the F-35's forward-looking infrared sensor.
    Northrop Grumman Corporation recently demonstrated the ballistic missile detection, tracking and targeting capabilities of the F-35 DAS and AN/APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, both of which are featured on the F-35 aircraft.
    More about the F-35 DAS: More at www.northropgru...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 395

  • @RocketPropelledGuy
    @RocketPropelledGuy Рік тому +16

    Most advanced fighter ever, but it appears Northrop Grumman made the commercial in the 90's. All we're missing is a couple of freeze frames

    • @alexv3357
      @alexv3357 Рік тому +2

      The core design of the fighter was finalised in the late 90s, so that's not wrong

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 10 місяців тому

      Eh, one would assume that creating modern, high end, beautiful commercials for military equipment isnt very high up on the priority list.

  • @DIEXEL
    @DIEXEL 14 років тому +131

    Northrop!
    You are a multi billion corporation and can't have your videos in HD!?

    • @kunalmahajan9489
      @kunalmahajan9489 4 роки тому +17

      Lmao, what a crack. But I've seen some Music videos from 2010 or before with same quality

    • @SherlockHolmes-bc1hv
      @SherlockHolmes-bc1hv 2 роки тому +4

      Lol

    • @Rudenbehr
      @Rudenbehr 10 місяців тому +3

      HD was kinda hard in 2010 on UA-cam.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 10 місяців тому +2

      @@Rudenbehr And the video might have been even older than that. It was only uploaded on youtube in 2010. And, of course, making their product commercial that are getting released to the public HD probably isnt their top priority

  • @northropgrummanmedia
    @northropgrummanmedia  11 років тому +59

    Thanks to all our viewers for helping us reach more than 900,000 views!

    • @GiftedFestiveBee
      @GiftedFestiveBee 4 роки тому +3

      DAS pretty cool!

    • @rogyrulles4137
      @rogyrulles4137 3 роки тому

      hehehe u have job for Software Engineer??? LMAO

    • @ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й
      @ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й 3 роки тому

      a cartoon that has nothing to do with the real truth of air combat

    • @bq1000bq
      @bq1000bq 3 роки тому +4

      @@ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й When's your Su-57 Pak Fa Talon going to start mass production? In real life, not cartoon animation?

    • @excaliber8794
      @excaliber8794 2 роки тому +1

      Jesus it took you 8 years to get twice the views

  • @simulacra7885
    @simulacra7885 Рік тому +5

    The military industrial complex is fucking rad we need to double the defense budget

  • @northropgrummanmedia
    @northropgrummanmedia  11 років тому +33

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 9 років тому +1

      Хорошая аэродинамика самолетов, но технологии, воздушные суда, транспортные средства были изменены.А по аэродинамическому принципу строительства самолетов, вино самотеком с помощью новых физических законов.То, что сейчас скрывается за словами НЛО или летающая тарелка-это только приложение силы тяжести технологии, с набором новых функций для физических.Невидимость для радаров и невидимости в видимом спектре видимости,в то же время, способность летать в пространстве и во времени. Скоростные характеристики гравитационных самолетов, просто не доступны военных самолетов, в том числе и F-.35

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 9 років тому

      Good aerodynamics of the aircraft, but the technology, aircraft, vehicles have been modified.And on the aerodynamic principle of the construction of the aircraft, the wine is by gravity with the help of new physical laws.What now lies behind the words UFO or flying saucer-this is only the application of gravity technology with a set of new features for the physical.Invisibility to radar and invisible in the visible spectrum of visibility,at the same time, the ability to fly in space and in time. Speed characteristics of gravity of the aircraft, just not available for military aircraft, including F-35.

    • @РенатРоссия-ь3е
      @РенатРоссия-ь3е 5 років тому

      Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
      А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!

    • @pearlharborcauser2020
      @pearlharborcauser2020 6 місяців тому

      @@РенатРоссия-ь3еpropagandaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    • @pearlharborcauser2020
      @pearlharborcauser2020 6 місяців тому

      @@РенатРоссия-ь3еhow come su-35 got shot down 💀

  • @MrLeet71
    @MrLeet71 4 роки тому +15

    This system has been improved and will be installed on attack helicopters as well.. I'm sure the super Hornets and other aircraft will also be getting the systems and share targeting data and other information

  • @JorgeGamaliel
    @JorgeGamaliel 9 років тому +16

    Trigonometry everywhere. Trigonometry, Spherical Trigonometry, Euler Angles, Trigonometric Equations, Delaunay triangulation, Propulsion Systems, Chemical reactions, Turbines, Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, The Boundary Layer Theory, Quantum Dots, Nanotechnology,... etc etc. In fact The Air Force is lot of Physics and Mathematics :D

  • @ThomasLee123
    @ThomasLee123 5 років тому +21

    The Electro Optical - Distributed Aperture System - DAS is a fantastic addition to pilot awareness. This advancement helps all F-15 pilots do what only the best of the best have been have been able to accomplish in the past. It, essentially, makes our entire pilot compliment into 100% top gun level operators.
    Distributed Aperture refers to the ability of the F-15 computer to take information from sensors around the aircraft and convert is into a 3-d environment similar to the Virtual Reality available in many games these days. F-15 Pilots are able to see all areas of the combat environment including below and to the rear of the aircraft as though the aircraft was invisible. (To DAS and its pilot, it is.) The difference is that DAS is real live data that gives the pilot immediate knowledge of the wartime environment of the jet aircraft. Top Gun level pilots have been able to do some of this in their heads by interpreting visual and instrument cues in their brain. Now all pilots have this ability.

    • @c-g9375
      @c-g9375 5 років тому +1

      Thomas Lee U most be aware that were ECW come in to play by receiving information admitting aircraft dail in on data then counter measures is applied.

  • @darren1093
    @darren1093 2 роки тому +11

    That is very frightening what it's capabilities are , it's amazing

    • @patewing5808
      @patewing5808 2 роки тому

      only thing is in reality it is not going to work and DAS system is nightmare so unreliable

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 10 місяців тому +2

      @@patewing5808 And, I assume that you are senior engineer at Northrop Grumman for you to be so certain about such a system? Or do you have a F-35 pilot or technician as a friend who shares classified information about cutting edge systems?

    • @patewing5808
      @patewing5808 10 місяців тому

      @@jurajsintaj6644 Kid I am more then qualified to talk about F-35 then you can imagine . Degree and 40 years of experience in radio physics . So called " stealth " and diffraction phenomena is something I do . Let me tell you something about US military complex . It is purpose is profit not defense of US . The people who write about this stuff in the popular ‘science’ and ‘technology’ media have absolutely NO scientific knowledge or professional credentials whatsoever…they simply repeat the nonsense they are told by various publicists working for the defense industry, and have no proper scientific education to tell what is plausible and what is not…The buzzword ‘fifth generation’ is completely meaningless…it is just a gimmick dreamed up by PR people in the US defense industry in order to create hype among the uneducated and clueless public, so that these companies, like Boeing and Lockheed, can get massive amounts of taxpayer cash for completely unreal and unscientific stuff like so-called ‘stealth’…
      It’s a magic money machine, based on parlor trickery, and that’s all…

  • @youtert
    @youtert 10 років тому +150

    I hope the DAS has better resolution than this video.

  • @ragingbull8024
    @ragingbull8024 8 років тому +16

    DAS my boy,go F-35.

  • @Champ1964
    @Champ1964 13 років тому +4

    DAS seems to be a insightful deterrent for future enemy threats. Not that we are currently being threatened, but for those who wish to challenge, may think twice. For those too ignorant to understand the need to be on top, This Technology will also leak down toward other products that make our world safer in all forms of transportation. I applaud DAS.. and recommend a song for use during exercises. put some Flare on it and call it DAZZ from the Music of Brick 1976. lol

  • @normanelison
    @normanelison 4 місяці тому +1

    wow I didn t know this company has a youtube account maybe I gotta check lockheed martin and boeing too

  • @louie55ish
    @louie55ish 8 років тому +17

    Scrap the 35, install DAS on the 22.
    Then you yanks will truly have a world beater like the 15/16 was in the 70s/80s.

    • @Nicolas-hf8wl
      @Nicolas-hf8wl 8 років тому

      DUH of course The F-22 already has it too

    • @louie55ish
      @louie55ish 8 років тому +3

      Er... No it doesn't. It has the MLD

    • @Nicolas-hf8wl
      @Nicolas-hf8wl 8 років тому

      louie55ish which is basically the same thing FACEPALM

    • @Gunsncarsnstuff
      @Gunsncarsnstuff 8 років тому

      +Nicolas Nope

    • @4CatsGuy
      @4CatsGuy 7 років тому +2

      I totally agree -- scrap the F-35 and install the Electro Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) on the FA-18E/F Super Hornet. The unfortunate F-35 is a complete lemon, and will, no doubt, go down as one of the greatest failures in aviation history. The F-35 began its development as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1992 -- Yes, 25 years ago!!! Yet Initial Operational Capability (IOC) has only very recently been declared in the USMC and USAF in very corrupt testing schemes. And Full Operational Capability (FOC) has not been attained by any service's F-35s, and won't be for quite some time. That means the F-35 remains not fully combat ready. It still has a laundry list of unresolved significant problems, yet over 200 F-35s have now rolled off the assembly lines. That means that all current, and many future F-35s will need extensive rework. At least the Navy has had the good sense to not embrace the F-35, and to purchase the failed aircraft in very limited numbers, as politically required. It is quite clear that the F-35 will be THE LAST aircraft that will be developed for all three flying branches (Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps), and the F-35 program is nothing short of being an albatross/white elephant, and complete waste, fraud, and abuse to United States' and participating countries' taxpayers.

  • @timmcquearysr5270
    @timmcquearysr5270 9 років тому +4

    this coupled with the 100 kilo laser, nothing could hit it. save the missiles for some thing else! it could take out every ground and air target in a extremely short amount of time. the only nee for missiles are large fortified targets? ( bunkers ect.) tanks ect. can be taken out with laser! missiles would be for well over the horizon targets??

    • @scythelord
      @scythelord 9 років тому

      tim mcquearysr There exists no laser currently that could be effective against bunkers or tanks. Especially none that can be airborne. A tank would take ridiculous amounts of time for a laser to have an affect on it.

    • @AbsurdJosh
      @AbsurdJosh 9 років тому

      +scythelord I think he means against SAMs.

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 років тому

      Laser might can't
      But don't be so idiotic guys u.s had a lot of kinds of weapons on its weaponry
      Don't be dumb...

  • @tobylicious494
    @tobylicious494 8 років тому +47

    I would say I feel sorry for our enemies but- no; I don't feel sorry for them.

    • @casey19660
      @casey19660 5 років тому +5

      @landry KAMGA bwahahaha yea whatever moron.

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 років тому +1

      nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

  • @Dragon029
    @Dragon029 13 років тому +2

    @atmodom What happens when the Typhoon or Rafale has its radar jammed? DAS is only one of multiple targeting systems on the F-35; for off-bore radar tracking, the F-35 has the AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare radar suite and for forward / long range target tracking the APG-81 AESA radar in the nose. That's 2 systems providing 360 degree tracking and 3 tracking within an angle inside the forward hemisphere.

  • @Retroscoop
    @Retroscoop 6 років тому +5

    1) Do only US F 35's have the best DAS (or also the Israeli ones, those of the NATO countries that want to buy the F 35 or already have signed a contract ?
    2) How does DAS make a distinction between militairy trucks, ambulances, militairy trucks disguised as ambulances etc. ?
    3) Can't DAS be countered by new ECM leaving the multi million system virtually blind ? Add that prospect together with better and more mobile radars and the main advantages of the whole expensive packet might be gone through the drain before very long. Don't forget the plane is supposed to last for the next 30 years. That are quite a number of years either to catch up via spionage and own R&D or to developed effective counter measures.
    4) Isn't it such a complex system, that it will be "out" every two weeks, resulting in far too many F 35's in repair ?

    • @twocansams6335
      @twocansams6335 2 роки тому +1

      DAS is just infrared cameras placed around the jet, to defeat das you would have to defeat a infrared camera.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 10 місяців тому

      1) If there are going to be upgrades to the DAS system that are hardware upgrades, its likely that the US will receive them first, simply by the nature of it being the main producer of the system. Other nations will most likely slowly receive the upgrade as well, of course.
      2) The combination of radar, the much larger IR camera on a swivel under the turret, and the DAS create a relatively high definition picture of the target. I am pretty sure theres a demonstration somewhere on youtube, Ill try to find it. But at that point, its up to the pilot to decide. Also disguising military equipment as medical/civilian while its a combatant its a warcrime.
      3)No. DAS is a collection of IR cameras. To jam it, you would practically need to do the equivalent of pointing an IR flashlight at the plane, which would be really short range. And to do that, you would also need to find and track the aircraft. And it can also use the radar to detect ground targets.
      4) It is not a complex system hardware wise, as it is just IR cameras. It is complex digitally, however. Digital bugs may occur, but fixes can be done quickly, to every single F-35 at once, instantly.

  • @alabamamothman2986
    @alabamamothman2986 5 років тому +3

    If Russian radar can detect the F-35 or jam it's electronics (probably) this aircraft wouldnt stand chance against the SU-35 fighter.
    We are relying on a tech superiority that may not exist to level they expect. If at all.
    You simply cannot assume that against a modern military. We need aircraft that OUTPERFORM their aircraft. And NOT rely on wishful thinking.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 5 років тому

      SU-35 doesn't have F-15C's low wing loading.
      web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/
      SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM
      24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs
      Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading.
      Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors.
      Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions.
      F-16C Block 50
      Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs
      Wing area: 300 ft²
      Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1
      F-18E
      Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs
      Wing area: 500 ft²
      Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. (minimum turn radius dogfighter)
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1
      SU-30MK
      Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs
      Wing area: 667 ft²
      Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1
      F-35A
      Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015).
      Wing area: 460 ft²
      Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1
      SU-35
      www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf
      Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference)
      Wing area: 667 ft²
      Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf each engine)
      F-15C
      Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs
      Wing area: 608 ft²
      Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
      F-22A
      Empty Weight: 43,340 lb
      Wing area: 840 ft²
      Wing loading: 51.59 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.71 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
      F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade
      Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015).
      Wing area: 460 ft²
      Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade)
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade)

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 років тому

      Do you really think u.s let that happen ?
      Of course they already had an answer for that ...
      They think advance and faster than you do..

  • @РенатРоссия-ь3е
    @РенатРоссия-ь3е 5 років тому +1

    Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
    А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 років тому

      cowboys ate crazy mushrooms-ковбои ели сумасшедшие грибы

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      Alright buddy. Stay in your S400 truck while a HARM comes your way without you even knowing...

  • @Wat-Dat
    @Wat-Dat 2 роки тому +1

    Let your missiles do the turning

  • @cannrickyf14
    @cannrickyf14 11 років тому +4

    Look awesome and impresive, only I hope that the President and Congrees dont cut buget to this full F-35 program because then will be handicap and crap F-35. If some dont know yet, the F-22 Raptor had cuts as Helmet Vision hud meanwhile in 2008 the Typhoon was testing their Helmet Hud in Nellis A Base, Red Flag exercices.

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 5 років тому

      no i hope they pour another 1.5 trillions in it, before calling it a dud. that will teach lockheed to make planes, that actually deliver what they promise, on time.

  • @girlsforstemusa970
    @girlsforstemusa970 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you for all you do

  • @danbrown4781
    @danbrown4781 6 років тому +1

    Gotta say thats pretty fckn impressive and to consider that there are many more classified secrets to this thing maybe it really doesn't need to get in a dogfight afterall

  • @eugenedowling7380
    @eugenedowling7380 5 років тому +3

    Nice!

  • @michaelwestmoreland2530
    @michaelwestmoreland2530 Рік тому

    Stop the cap. Stop the cap RIGHT NOW, stop the cap.
    You are NOT selling me on an IRST with both the raw Agility AND sustained thrust necessary to pull a damn 180 degree turn, and then kill, off a PASSED MERGE.

  • @abdullahabdullah8872
    @abdullahabdullah8872 5 років тому +1

    Bunlar animasyon hayalet filmleri gibidir??.👽👽👽🕛🕒🤮🤮🤮💀💀💀:

  • @mattm57
    @mattm57 4 роки тому +6

    At 4:24 they were targeting vehicles around Angels Stadium 😳

  • @commercio3564
    @commercio3564 5 років тому +3

    *D A S*

  • @ace7_skies_unknown207
    @ace7_skies_unknown207 2 роки тому +1

    Meanwhile chinese:✍✍✍✍

  • @mehran808
    @mehran808 5 років тому +8

    f-35 not only can destroy all target on air and graund-
    on earth but also on mars and venus too

    • @c-g9375
      @c-g9375 5 років тому

      jasem adodi u a file🤗

    • @mehran808
      @mehran808 5 років тому

      toro khoda nega ham vatanaye ma

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 років тому

      and throughout the galaxy as well hahahahahahahahahahahahah

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 років тому

      cowboys suck

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      Hey! They haven't built missiles that can reach QUITE that distance while being portable!

  • @sazzoryazhary3001
    @sazzoryazhary3001 5 років тому +1

    Lol

  • @papiyon66
    @papiyon66 5 років тому +1

    Futuro hoy en la armada EEUU alucinante el poder armamentista .

    • @papiyon66
      @papiyon66 5 років тому +1

      @@ciudadmafiosamafiacityarri1859 EEUU sigue siendo el número uno en tecnología y armamento civil y militar incluso se sostiene que tienen una red de naves espaciales en la órbita terrestre

  • @jdouglasusn
    @jdouglasusn 13 років тому +1

    @BoxyTheSpaceDog "why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?"
    Because this video isn't about those.

  • @badlav120
    @badlav120 2 роки тому

    Hmm so this is how DAS works Americans are far ahead compared.to.the world

  • @Left4Green
    @Left4Green 6 років тому +4

    aimbot ffs ;///

  • @Thrax005
    @Thrax005 14 років тому +1

    Can I get a job at Northrpgrumman you guys.

  • @c-g9375
    @c-g9375 5 років тому +2

    That technology is old Russia Ben had that in MIG 31 better known as friend or foe🇷🇺 ASE radar was invited in Russia technology hell taken 20 years for U.S. to catch up 📋✏️.

  • @Cosmosballgarou
    @Cosmosballgarou 3 роки тому +1

    It a scam

  • @KieuNguyen-uq1ow
    @KieuNguyen-uq1ow 5 років тому

    USA number1 l from in vietnam l don't like , l like USA

  • @iamscoutstfu
    @iamscoutstfu 2 роки тому

    Civilian planes could use a limited version of this.

  • @fentonreese6935
    @fentonreese6935 8 років тому +2

    Awesome

  • @cannrickyf14
    @cannrickyf14 11 років тому +2

    This F-35 advanse hight technology look awesome and impresive but I hope that the President or Congress dont reduce buget to this full program because then will be a handicap F-35 as was the measure to F-22 Helmet Raptor replacing the Hud display.

    • @davidsalcido383
      @davidsalcido383 5 років тому

      cannricky Perez: “ The $2 Trillion 💰🍋JSF-35 promises everything but delivers Little more than more profits to McDonald-Douglas’ War Profiteers?!!!”

  • @ahmadzaiwahedi5788
    @ahmadzaiwahedi5788 5 років тому +1

    fack

  • @shaind
    @shaind 11 років тому +1

    Simple EO-IR, which is neither integrated nor giviging 360 degree coverage, is no compared to EODAS.

  • @marthapena1903
    @marthapena1903 9 років тому +9

    DAS? F35 ? even the Pentagono knows Pak Fa SU 50 is the best aircraft so please ignored this video is just a movie

    • @Dominikmj
      @Dominikmj 9 років тому +11

      +martha pena
      It is an non-lateral comparison. Yes - the PakFa might be better in classical air-to-air combat. Though it has a worse RCS [stealth], and definitely not as advanced avionics, which makes all the difference. Classic dogfight capabilities become meaningless, if your opponent doesn't need to turn his nose towards you and doesn't need to fly behind you...
      Further- while nobody really can objectively confirm when the T-50 will be deployed - the F-35 is already deployed.
      Most important is, that the T-50 is rather an air-superiority (with multirole capabilities) jet - while the F-35 is rather a multirole fighter (with air combat capabilities).
      Russian airplanes were always far overestimated, until they could be studied. Starting with the Mig-25/31 to the Mig-29 and even the Su-27. And the biggest issue seems to be the unequal information "share" of Russia and the US. Nobody says in Russia a word about problems with an airframe and issues. In the US it is always criticised and openly discussed - that make the fighters seem very unequal - but reality looks often much different!

    • @edwardrodriguez4312
      @edwardrodriguez4312 7 років тому

      martha pena f-35 Das can detect Su-50 when su-50's engine give off heat and Das can see 360 degrees so su-50 cant make surprise attack on su-50

    • @hnl5100
      @hnl5100 5 років тому +1

      The speciality of russians is supermanoeuvrability not stealth technology so I don't know what you're talking about

    • @suryapratamak1690
      @suryapratamak1690 5 років тому

      @@hnl5100 he actually means that the russian su 57s are so good that even the russians dont wanna buy it...too good to buy maybe..LOL

    • @paperthin2
      @paperthin2 5 років тому +1

      @@suryapratamak1690 SU50 = all show, no go!

  • @studentloans2488
    @studentloans2488 Рік тому

    R&D budget: 421 billion USD
    Animation budget: 200 bucks

  • @raminabdeshahrei2661
    @raminabdeshahrei2661 5 років тому +1

    I don’t think so 🤔

  • @gaiusdelmonte3631
    @gaiusdelmonte3631 5 років тому +1

    Wing Nut

  • @jamesmani5985
    @jamesmani5985 5 років тому

    Good fighter
    But US may not ship to India as India Has S400 systems too

    • @casey19660
      @casey19660 5 років тому

      No. Neither turkey nor india is getting them.

    • @jamesmani5985
      @jamesmani5985 5 років тому

      @@casey19660 but Lockeed is started plant withTatas Indian MNC in South India to supply F21=F22 raptor For medium combat
      India seems hesitant on the deal

  • @Spartan-op2ed
    @Spartan-op2ed 2 роки тому

    Ratheon is building the das system's for cheaper and five times the performance.

  • @justinalevi9038
    @justinalevi9038 5 років тому +1

    You forgot two vay firewalls. Like to listen to the commercial for Kaspersky

  • @vlchhakchhuak607
    @vlchhakchhuak607 5 років тому

    Why advertising other product..lockheed martin.?why gruman

  • @donbryant58
    @donbryant58 6 років тому

    Act now and you can get another F35 for free with purchase of the F35 you just pay shipping and handling.

  • @musiomusio3848
    @musiomusio3848 5 років тому +1

    Identify the reality on the battlefield

  • @BoleDaPole
    @BoleDaPole 3 роки тому

    Sold. id like to buy a dozen, hit me up in the PMs
    Do u ship to afrika?

  • @ayiearjuna69
    @ayiearjuna69 5 років тому +1

    totally underestimate their enemy.. in real combat, u not only have DAS but ur aircraft will blast off in the air.. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @jaysmith6864
      @jaysmith6864 5 років тому +1

      will blast off in the air -- LOL!

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 років тому

      And how do you possibly do that?
      Hahaha your not paying attention I think..

    • @seanyboyo1969
      @seanyboyo1969 5 років тому

      Your name gave me a bigger laugh than your illogical comment, :D MuhaMAD Naz(r)i ! Got to say that the connetations of the word play was just so perfect.....

  • @newhampshirelifestyle4233
    @newhampshirelifestyle4233 3 роки тому

    This technology needs to be deployed at the US-Mexico border.

  • @giko2556
    @giko2556 5 років тому

    nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

  • @Dragosflash
    @Dragosflash 5 років тому

    China takes notice

  • @plumbertech8843
    @plumbertech8843 6 років тому +4

    I feel sorry for Russia's S400 S500 systems LOL

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 років тому

      if you're so strong try it-cowboys

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      ​@@giko2556 Oh I'd LOVE to fly an F-35, let alone getting to shoot something with it!

  • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
    @ИванИванов-я7т5о 8 років тому

    In creating the aircraft experienced a technical revolution to change the aerodynamic principle of the creation of aircraft which is used to create planes came gravity.Eliminated the need for the wings in jet engines running on kerosene and in many other ways.

  • @РобертКораев
    @РобертКораев 4 роки тому

    Хороший мультик. Только даже против МиГ 21 у него шансов нет.

  • @LOHxDOV
    @LOHxDOV 4 роки тому +1

    I use 30/30 too

  • @mbahmoechannel3061
    @mbahmoechannel3061 9 років тому +8

    Just a simulator. But in fact that scenario not so easy

    • @gibbsm
      @gibbsm 8 років тому +1

      +Hendra Djokam it's powered by element 115 tho!

    • @louie55ish
      @louie55ish 8 років тому

      +Matt Gibbs
      Holy shit, I nearly choked on my carot I was eating. Nice !

  • @vladislavsheer1977
    @vladislavsheer1977 7 років тому

    Here there is something non-human: it is worth to detain attention in this miracle, and it is already impossible to tear yourself away from admiration. It's exactly the same as falling in love!

  • @gremwheper
    @gremwheper 6 років тому +1

    HOOYAH America

  • @themewong7479
    @themewong7479 2 роки тому +2

    I love das so much it’s give me sense
    of security

  • @adrianwilliams8278
    @adrianwilliams8278 9 років тому +3

    The only reason the f-35 will need off boar sight weapons is because it can't dogfight,maybe the U.S should just stick to SAMs

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/Y4DWX-R8ME8/v-deo.html
      F-35A vs F-22A vs EF Turn.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/k3b-b762QRY/v-deo.html
      Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example
      Original source (non-English)
      suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/
      Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish)
      nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/
      More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot.
      I quote
      _Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo_

  • @РенатРоссия-ь3е
    @РенатРоссия-ь3е 5 років тому

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    🇷🇺 Su35 fucking F35 like little girl....

  • @Timrem1
    @Timrem1 4 роки тому

    I worked at Northrop Grumman at biz town I was ceo

  • @patriced3364
    @patriced3364 3 роки тому

    Such a weird design!

  • @roycook2908
    @roycook2908 2 роки тому

    Untill it loses one engine. Then it becomes a pile of scrap

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      Mate if your car breaks down do you sell it for scrap and buy a new one or do you fix it?

  • @สัญญาแวงวรรณ-ฟ2ซ

    มีเอฟ35ไว้ท.อ12ลำพอดีไทยไม่มีดีสำหรับอเมริกาเพราะทหารเผล็ดการเหมือนคอมมืวเมินโลกเสรืทำยิ่งอีกทหารใหญ่

  • @janegeary6013
    @janegeary6013 9 років тому +9

    The shoot back missile has half the range of a shoot forward missile because it is expending extra fuel turning in ways conventional missiles do not, so it would only scare off a pursuer who's lining up for a gun kill. This is why 99% of missile fighting is moving your airplane into a position where the missile you're firing has to do the least amount of turning to hit the enemy (has the best kinematics).
    Modern SAM can fire on the move and detect in bands the F-35 isn't stealthy in, so DAS is a bit useless in that respect. Not to mention DAS is something plenty of other aircraft have (Gripen etc), it's not some new invention.
    Also DAS and reverse firing missiles can be installed on a WWII prop bomber, if they were so powerful as to make turning useless, why even pay hundreds of millions for a jet airframe?

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 8 років тому +1

      +Jane Geary F-35 can detect SAM's missile launch can enable F-35 to counter attack. DAS has missile tracking capability.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 років тому

      The Russians has first nuke strike options.

  • @grov2029
    @grov2029 3 роки тому

    Jajaja es bonito en dibujos en la realidad es otra cosa .. jajaj

  • @andycroucheaux4568
    @andycroucheaux4568 10 років тому

    All i've ever seen it do is a simple roll ...! CAN ANYONE SAY DIFFERENT ?

    • @mattslattery4107
      @mattslattery4107 8 років тому

      +Andy Croucheaux Vid on youtube of it doing a semi cobra check it out

  • @agustinusnukuboy8651
    @agustinusnukuboy8651 10 років тому

    Kemampuan Teknologi EO-DAS Pesawat F-35 belum mampu dirancang oleh Tim KFX / IFX. Saya yang sudah mampu merancang Sistem EO-DAS yang setara dengan Sistem F-35 dalam Proyek Pesawat ANFX versi saya.
    Uji Terbang ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak seluk-beluk Teori Dasar dan Integrasi Sistem dan sinkronisasi perhitungan Mekanika Terbang yang lebih inovatif yang harus dikembangkan sendiri dalam perancangan. Jadi ini sudah bisa saya aplikasikan sejak 12 tahun yang lalu, sekarang makin saya sempurnakan saja.
    Tim KFX / IFX belum mampu, masih belajar berkreasi sampai tahun 2024 nanti, masih bodoh mereka. Presiden JOKOWI harus diingatkan tentang pemborosan anggaran pembangunan di Proyek KFX / IFX ini. Periksa kembali Master Plan-nya yang korup itu, ganti anggota Timnya yang masih lambat mikir, makan gaji buta dari negara.
    Saya sekarang punya validasi Design Requirement & Objective (DRO) dan data-data Kemampuan Tempur Pesawat ANFX rancangan saya yang sudah bisa dijual tahun 2015 ke Lockheed Martin untuk diintegrasikan dengan assembly Pesawat F-35, atau diproduksi secara tersendiri.

    • @mbahmoechannel3061
      @mbahmoechannel3061 9 років тому

      Wah hebat bgt bapak ini sudah berani menandingi capabilities by Lockheed martin. Any avionics dalam f35 saja masih classified. Bapaknya sudah bisa menandingi millions codes super computer integrated f35..... Hebat bgt sampai aku tidak percaya

  • @alihijiiddi8977
    @alihijiiddi8977 5 років тому

    BLOOD LYSE YOU JUST WANNA PEOPLES TO BY YOU SHEETS JETS ITS JUST BOX JETS 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @dannywarchol3063
    @dannywarchol3063 5 років тому

    Who is current Aopa President ? DW

  • @stephtt1984
    @stephtt1984 5 років тому

    I believe Northrop Grumman since they are succses build Bomber B-52 Spirit

    • @asianhawk303
      @asianhawk303 5 років тому +1

      Not b52 but B2, b52 is boeing

  • @xliver4
    @xliver4 13 років тому

    @azotos Why does it have to only be Americans? Every company does the same thing.

  • @phoenixdoubledeuce
    @phoenixdoubledeuce 13 років тому

    @Air2air1 you forgot 2add that the f35 is a nato joint strike fighter program

  • @meinfraulein380
    @meinfraulein380 4 роки тому

    10 yrs ago and barely operational

  • @denesse03
    @denesse03 11 років тому +1

    This is the reason why the F-35 is so expensive! so high tech for your money to carry! expensive gadgets always better than cheap ones! like cellphones!

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 5 років тому +1

      i hope it gets so expensive, congress refuses to buy it.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      ​@@Gunni1972 Hah, too late, they signed the contract and the planes are being delivered, world wide in fact!

  • @dave96979
    @dave96979 5 років тому +3

    The F35 isn't made for dog fights, so what good is this product?

    • @danzervos7606
      @danzervos7606 5 років тому +12

      Watch the video again and it will answer your question.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      And besides, for pure A2A there's always the beast that is the F-22.

  • @quangvien2141
    @quangvien2141 5 років тому

    BÁN. CHO. TAWAI...??...SÁNG. MẮT. OK.......

  • @mohammedansari4071
    @mohammedansari4071 5 років тому +3

    Best number one, s 400.

  • @manilaalmost3872
    @manilaalmost3872 5 років тому

    Wow😮😮😍🇺🇸

  • @교황성호성요안성-m8h
    @교황성호성요안성-m8h 6 років тому

    나는!교황성호성요안성프란체스코 모자 없고 앞치마 없는 지구 교황이다!

  • @jonahnangombe7217
    @jonahnangombe7217 5 років тому

    north Korea news

  • @scottlucidi6476
    @scottlucidi6476 4 роки тому +1

    Russia is like "can u rewind that, please?"
    China is like "copy that"

  • @andrespereydaresearch
    @andrespereydaresearch 3 роки тому

    nice arpeggiated hard-sync

  • @Gunni1972
    @Gunni1972 5 років тому +3

    have you figured out how to eliminate double imaging on the hud, when more than one sensor picks up the same signal? Or are the Pilots still turning it off?

    • @howardstover4641
      @howardstover4641 4 роки тому +2

      Gunni1972 You trying to prove how much you know? Not impressed

    • @osakanone
      @osakanone 2 роки тому +2

      Its just a dot product of forward vector of vector location of helmet vs vector location of hud. If it scores >0.75f, the DAS linear interpolates its opacity from 100% to 0% as it nears 0.90f. Literally every fighter with a HMD does this and has for the last 20 years.

  • @marauder247
    @marauder247 12 років тому

    Too bad your information is hopelessly out of date. The BAE HMD is a backup that only addresses the jitter issues the VSI HMD had with night vision. The BAE HMD is on its way to being cancelled now that VSI has a grip on the jitter issues.

  • @PrithvisAccount
    @PrithvisAccount 11 років тому

    Lol, Its funny to see how Sukhoi and Typhoon are getting busted. But reality may be different. They may have more sophisticated counter measures.

  • @pepsico815
    @pepsico815 13 років тому

    Seriously, how many air-to-air combat situations do we even encounter each year? What a huge waste of money.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 6 місяців тому

      Buddy. The thing can carry A2A missiles. And also the F-22 still exists, and the only reason there aren't more is Congress being stupid and forgetting price goes down the more something is produced.

  • @sidex15
    @sidex15 8 років тому

    that Fighter Is Cheater.....

  • @lastsion20
    @lastsion20 12 років тому +2

    HOLY S*(T !!!! Why didn't we have this when I was flying for the Navy? All I can say is " AWESOME " !!!!!!

  • @haridravanil4228
    @haridravanil4228 6 років тому

    I have some doubt that how many dreams come to true in real life

    • @0MoTheG
      @0MoTheG 5 років тому

      It is a matter of time. The software is under constant development.