0:09 Aria 4:50 Variatio 1. a 1 Clav. 6:02 Variatio 2. a 1 Clav. 8:10 Variatio 3. Canone all'Unisono. a 1 Clav. 9:23 Variatio 4. a 1 Clav. 10:43 Variatio 5. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav. 11:44 Variatio 6. Canone alla Seconda. a 1 Clav. 13:30 Variatio 7. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav. al tempo di Giga 14:41 Variatio 8. a 2 Clav. 15:54 Variatio 9. Canone alla Terza. a 1 Clav. 17:10 Variatio 10. Fughetta. a 1 Clav. 18:17 Variatio 11. a 2 Clav. 19:36 Variatio 12. a 1 Clav. Canone alla Quarta in moto contrario 21:20 Variatio 13. a 2 Clav. 24:18 Variatio 14. a 2 Clav. 25:42 Variatio 15. Canone alla Quinta. a 1 Clav.: Andante 28:58 Variatio 16. Ouverture. a 1 Clav. 31:56 Variatio 17. a 2 Clav. 33:12 Variatio 18. Canone alla Sesta. a 1 Clav. 34:18 Variatio 19. a 1 Clav. 35:08 Variatio 20. a 2 Clav. 36:27 Variatio 21. Canone alla Settima 38:32 Variatio 22. a 1 Clav. alla breve 39:25 Variatio 23. a 2 Clav. 40:48 Variatio 24. Canone all'Ottava. a 1 Clav. 42:33 Variatio 25. a 2 Clav.: Adagio 47:10 Variatio 26. a 2 Clav. 48:23 Variatio 27. Canone alla Nona. a 2 Clav. 49:42 Variatio 28. a 2 Clav. 51:13 Variatio 29. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav. 52:30 Variatio 30. a 1 Clav. Quodlibet 53:52 Aria da Capo
Beautiful. Some liberties were taken in this performance, but with an instrument that is so limited in dynamics, the artist may embellish to provide expression.
FYI It is not a version; It's the original. Bach went to Northern Germany to see a piano built by Silbermann. Bach did not have a piano similar to the ones we know nowadays.
This is so beautifully played! 💝 I'm curious though, if I may kindly ask? What is the purpose of playing the first note in the left hand a little bit before the note in the right hand, even though they are both on the same beat? Is it to distinguish more clearly between the different melodies/voices...?
I have to add… I never really even began to understand and appreciate these variations or the main aria until each voice has the perfect balance that only a harpsichord can achieve! No attempt by the performer to emphasize one voice over the other can possibly succeed! (Not even Glenn Gould could make me enjoy and appreciate these gems the way this performer does)
Can someone please explain the program notations ״a 2 Clav.” “a 1 Clav.” and “ o vero “? I can’t believe my own brain trying to tell me it is for 2 keyboards?
Deliberately. Did you REALLY think she didn't know? She's a professional, for God's sake! This is a matter of personal taste. What an unutterably stupid post!
0:09 Aria
4:50 Variatio 1. a 1 Clav.
6:02 Variatio 2. a 1 Clav.
8:10 Variatio 3. Canone all'Unisono. a 1 Clav.
9:23 Variatio 4. a 1 Clav.
10:43 Variatio 5. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav.
11:44 Variatio 6. Canone alla Seconda. a 1 Clav.
13:30 Variatio 7. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav. al tempo di Giga
14:41 Variatio 8. a 2 Clav.
15:54 Variatio 9. Canone alla Terza. a 1 Clav.
17:10 Variatio 10. Fughetta. a 1 Clav.
18:17 Variatio 11. a 2 Clav.
19:36 Variatio 12. a 1 Clav. Canone alla Quarta in moto contrario
21:20 Variatio 13. a 2 Clav.
24:18 Variatio 14. a 2 Clav.
25:42 Variatio 15. Canone alla Quinta. a 1 Clav.: Andante
28:58 Variatio 16. Ouverture. a 1 Clav.
31:56 Variatio 17. a 2 Clav.
33:12 Variatio 18. Canone alla Sesta. a 1 Clav.
34:18 Variatio 19. a 1 Clav.
35:08 Variatio 20. a 2 Clav.
36:27 Variatio 21. Canone alla Settima
38:32 Variatio 22. a 1 Clav. alla breve
39:25 Variatio 23. a 2 Clav.
40:48 Variatio 24. Canone all'Ottava. a 1 Clav.
42:33 Variatio 25. a 2 Clav.: Adagio
47:10 Variatio 26. a 2 Clav.
48:23 Variatio 27. Canone alla Nona. a 2 Clav.
49:42 Variatio 28. a 2 Clav.
51:13 Variatio 29. a 1 ô vero 2 Clav.
52:30 Variatio 30. a 1 Clav. Quodlibet
53:52 Aria da Capo
Thank you for marking it. I really appreciate it!
@@ziliang1537 This is the best and most satisfying 1hr I've spent for a long time now.
Excellent. This is a wonderful interpretation that I'm really enjoying.
The three voices are sung distinctly, almost analytically. Excellent performance.
Danke, sehr klar und präzise gespielt. Und trotzdem gefühlvoll und menschlich.🎹🎶👍
Zi Liang.... you are amazing!!! I love the goldberg variations!!! I love Bach🥰🥰
Tellement + beau et intéressant qu'au piano moderne ! Faut dire aussi que c'est magnifiquement joué...
You learned quite a lot from the 1964 Leonhardt - and use it excellently!
Thank you! I couldn’t resist to listen and learn from that particular performance…
Lovely performance! Thank you for sharing this. 💐
Auch am Cembalo großartig,ja,freue mich danke 😌
Grandiosly superfluous
I enjoy your lightly performance, thanks you a lot. Reminds me Wanda Landowska version
She's super!
Thank you very much. I enjoyed this excellent performance.
Loved your song Liang! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🤩
Thank you for this superb performance of such a difficult work.
Thank you for listening.
beautiful! the parts are nicely separated - thank you for sharing!
Excellent!
Muchísimas gracias por tan gran maravilla! 🌹🌹🌹
Variaciones Sublimes...!!!
Wonderful💐💐
Wow! Exquisite interpretation of such a monumental work! 😁
Beautiful. Some liberties were taken in this performance, but with an instrument that is so limited in dynamics, the artist may embellish to provide expression.
Actually the harpsichordist is following 18th century performance practice rather than “taking liberties” The piano has its limitations, too.
Wow, this is amazing! I like harpsichord version!
FYI It is not a version; It's the original. Bach went to Northern Germany to see a piano built by Silbermann. Bach did not have a piano similar to the ones we know nowadays.
Great!!
Merci madame pour cette vidéo !
Thank you for watching!
Bravissima!!!!
弹得真好
Parabéns muito bom.
She holds an unchallenged position as an interpreter of Bach
She is a great Alchemist of harpsicord
Who is she?
Molto dolce 🌺
The Aria is like Bach's own version of Nocturne
oh yea.
🌹 🌹 🌹
This is so beautifully played! 💝 I'm curious though, if I may kindly ask? What is the purpose of playing the first note in the left hand a little bit before the note in the right hand, even though they are both on the same beat? Is it to distinguish more clearly between the different melodies/voices...?
Yes, and I would also add that it’s more of a stylistic choice as well.
I think it is a bit fractured sounding, unsyncopated
Is is NOT a style of any Baroque school of performance and she is wrong for doing so.
A Dowd Blanchet, I perceive.
Yes!
the harpsichord is an amazing instrument is it not!
Thanks for subscribing!
yes
It makes this rendition so much easier to follow!
I have to add… I never really even began to understand and appreciate these variations or the main aria until each voice has the perfect balance that only a harpsichord can achieve! No attempt by the performer to emphasize one voice over the other can possibly succeed! (Not even Glenn Gould could make me enjoy and appreciate these gems the way this performer does)
@@dougr.2398 oh wow, I am SO happy to read this and know that you have enjoyed my performance. Thanks for listening and your kind words.
Can someone please explain the program notations ״a 2 Clav.” “a 1 Clav.” and “ o vero “? I can’t believe my own brain trying to tell me it is for 2 keyboards?
Very musical, except with too many slips to really enjoy the music.
Miz Liang should wear sneakers or other soft soled shoes. Her foot stomping is irritating. Her playing is wonderful.
I totally agree.
It's the Glenn Gould singing of the 21st century.
It is the percussion section (like they do with flamenco guitar playing)!
Babies...We have the meats!!! (instead of Arby's)
Very nice sounding harpsichord. However, she is not playing accurately. Her left hand is not in exact unison with her right hand.
Deliberately. Did you REALLY think she didn't know? She's a professional, for God's sake! This is a matter of personal taste. What an unutterably stupid post!