Nuclear War Simulation - NATO vs Russia
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лип 2020
- This realistic, facts-based simulation is divided into 3 stages: Nuclear War, Nuclear Fallout and Nuclear Winter. Watch this video to find out what will happen to the world during each of those stages.
#ww3 #nuclearwar #nuclearwarsim #military #ukrainewar #nuclear - Наука та технологія
Watch my video: What are Anti-Radiation Pills? 💊☢️ ua-cam.com/video/r2iMW6HjqSQ/v-deo.htmlsi=Fxy9Puib-H0prY_n
You bought this channel
I think the total number of casualties is wrong. At least ten times more in 2 years.
"Russia most likely to begin a nuclear war". Wow that aged well...
I guess that was the *Master plan*
@carlykpdx Um it's being overrexaderrated by every western media and the worst part is people are dumb enough to buy it... It's war ffs of course they will raise readiness...
@carlykpdx That's just rusophobia speaking right there, it's just a state of war percussion no ww3 is going to happen.
She should have had china with Russia
@@Sveta7 you do realize Russia will destroy itself if they resort to nuclear weapons?
I think it’s safe to say that nobody can claim victory in a nuclear war.
M.A.D
Well no shit
"An interesting game. The only way to win is not to play."
No, the WEF/NWO with their population reduction scheme would declare victory. Actually, they would call it a "good start" ... They openly say they want the population at 500 million world wide
@@AmericanFreedom911 Nobody wins in a nuclear war. Except the people who don't survive. Those are the real winners
WINNERS!:
Losers: every country on the planet
australia and new zealand wins
@@Joseonhangukeo351 where it’s still -50C
@@Joseonhangukeo351they would still lose valuable trade links so no
@@crazyhBrazil and Chile wins. lol
@@alanwatts8239 nah, mollosia wins
I feel like an estimated 500 million casualties is a low estimate. The global economy would shut down and be ruined for years and nuclear winter would also destroy harvests for years so there would be a tremendous amount of starvation across the globe.
Maybe. That's the one statistic I think I messed up
The Georgia guidstones are gone.
That probably means that they already have their 500 million population already somewhere.
Maybe Greenland?
Or Antarctica?
Who knows...
All those missing children worldwide, the boats that have vanished in Bermuda triangle, after the Tsunami a lot of children were taken away with boats, people missing from refugee camps, etc.
They are already there and we are too much for them.
Sorry to bring you the bad news.
Judgement day 2027
Chao
@@KrissyNotty
Nuclear winter is an unproven theory
We never had such extreme temperature drops so we won't know for sure unless nuclear war does happen. It may be worse, or even better than predicted.
“War does not determine who is right - only who is left.”
- Bertrand Russell
He had a way with words...
nobody will be left
Eventually you will be Luckier dead.
@@haugan70 south america and africa will
Pov: He never said this
Economists be like: This would be bad for the economy
*only a little bit*
i mean your not wrong
Trump be like: how can I profit from this?
@@frasertones8519 Biden/Obama be like: "How many minorities, libs, and gays were offended by this."
Just a my. (my, the scale/measurement, no native speaker, hopefully you understand my English 😂)
"A Strange Game. The only winning move is NOT to play. How about a nice game of Chess?"
Indeed...
Best comment here
Yes my friend 🤭
Thats why Nuclear war is M.A.D. Mutually assured destruction!🤔
1:42 Greenland be like: what i did wrong
Pituffik Space Base, US military base
Absolutely horrifying to think that we are subjected to the whims and wants of a few idiots who are able to push that destructive button.
Absolute insanity. Most people just want peace, to carry on and enjoy their lives..
You worded that perfectly.
These people like Putin and Trump are all on a big ego trip and dont give a toss what happens as long as they get the last futile gesture in .🤨💕🖖
@@kevinscollan8293 The latter of those two is your best hope. Trump would not have launched till he was sure there was no other option. Biden, on the other hand, is not in control of his own mind and administration. He will do whatever he is told by his handlers. If Trump was still in office, this situation would have never occurred. Hence, your point would be moot.
While it is up to just a few individuals, thankfully there is no button. At least in the US, it is a multistage process that requires inputting codes and giving orders.
If nuclear war breaks out ever, I hope I'm fortunate enough to be one of the ones instantly vaporized by the blast. Anyone who thinks they would be lucky to avoid the initial blast would discover very quickly how unlucky they are.
As an Aussie I’d like to request you directly nuke us out of mercy. We already have snakes, spiders, sharks, box jellyfish and more - we don’t need nuclear winter as well.
@@MrEvilSprinkles could you imagine the fallout in aus wasnt too bad and mutated your already deadly islands deadly animals
@@TheEpicGameJunky lol can imagine giant shark/croc hybrids running around or huge tarantulas with 20 legs... No thank you.
@@FEE8Tth8BEA8T Thanks for giving that imagine in my head, I'll probably dream about that monster.
@@FEE8Tth8BEA8T honestly i would be more scared of the mutated drop bears
This is an excellent simulation, and it is not important if he did not show some factors. This simulation give a visual interactive simulation which gives now a better understanding for the viewer eye what to expect in a nuclear war. Well done EcuaVoz.
Living in a tropical country where the temperature is always 20-30 C throughout the year, I can’t imagine if suddenly it becomes -20 C.. millions will die overnight here
I have to say I wouldn't enjoy -80C either
Sure, the lowest temperature ever recorded in my country is +1C. So, I can deduce we won't feel very comfortable at -20C.
Добро пожаловать в Сибирь, у нас часто зимой бывает -40! 🙂 дети едят мороженое на улице и никто не умирает
Tropical people have adapted to 365 days of warm weather so anything below 20°C would be considered cold. Below 0°C they wouldn't survive for long.
@@roku_nine dude, 0°С or something below till 20° is not even close to deadliest situation. The only problem you will get is about planting food
“I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” - Albert Einstein.
Dreadfully on point 😳
"Population of humans in year of 2100 would be 0" - Stephen Hawkings.
@@sceptict We will see. He was such a pessimist because of his condition probably.
@Person scientist or not he was stuck in a wheelchair for most of his adult life. That's got to put a damper on your outlook. Like I said we will see. Only 80ish more years to go
nah ar15s
The Video is from 07/2020 so stop hating on this Dude
Yes please 😅
Exactly
The nuclear war simulation is loaded with misinformation. Pointing this out is not "hating" on the poster, merely pointing out some flaws in his "simulation".
I will hate on him, because I am scared 😱
@@KrissyNotty FACTS
I HAVE INCURRED SO MUCH LOSSES TRADING ON MY OWN. I TRADE WELL ON DEMO BUT I THINK THE REAL MARKET IS MANIPULATED. CAN ANYONE HELP ME OUT OR AT LEAST TELL ME WHAT I'M DOING WRONG?
Wow I'm just shock you mentioned and recommended Expert Mr Celso Fx Lorenzo, l thought I'm the only trading with him
Wtf, y'all know Mr Celso Fx Lorenzo too wow, he's really a good trader, he's my portfolio manager, his skills are top notch.didn't take him for the famous type.
Is his trading service here in Europe?
Who is this professional everyone is talking about I always see his post on top comments on every UA-cam video I watched
I would like to work with your trader how can I connect with him?
And I still remember the subscribers that told me, over 5 years ago, that Russia was not "likely" to start this madness... 😞
Can I upload this on my tik Tok ?. With you permission
But they won't start anything. The NATO oligarchs in the EU, such as Bildenberg Group, George Soros and the Rothchild, are the ones who want a global war to impose their "one world government" agenda. This will be the next big scare, mark my words.
No the United States and NATO will start this
They didn't start it...but will probably finish it...
Blame the corrupt hair sniffer and his kid for all the corruption in Ukraine... it was in the top 10 corrupt countries before we all started to cry for them
Yes okay, but remember to give credits to "EcuaVoz" please 🥺❤️🙏
I think casualties would actually be much higher after a month considering other countries would loose access to food or fuel and other supplies. A lot of starvation would probably occur.
The video did report many slow deaths due to starvation, etc.
Not to mention the pollution the nuclear fallout will fall into water supplies and food sources.
i'm not sure about other countries, but i'm pretty sure that if my country got -20°c there would be at least 100 milion deaths more
Nobody will survive a nuclear war. Only people in their bunkers will survive. But they will be stuck there for centuries. Making it also impossible to survive.
@@JoHn-if6wy why would they be stuck there
This is genuinely terrifying, considering recent events
It seriously is!! I never, ever thought I would be witnessing something like this.
A lot of nukes would get shot down over the oceans which is good and bad
I can't keep thinking about this... I feel so scared and selfish at the same time. Scared for the people at war right now. And selfish because I don't want war to come to America. Or anywhere else. I have 3 little girls.. I've never been depressed my entire life. I've kept it from the kids thus far but it is hard with how much it takes over my life right now. What can we do? I've never been more terrified. God help us all.
@@moviequotemasta Don't worry. NATO has no intention of a military engagement with Russia. That's why they want Ukraine to join NATO, so they can back Russia into a corner.
Russia will not tolerate this and so they have invaded Ukraine. You need to understand that a Russian victory in Ukraine helps maintain the existing power structure in the world. If NATO is in Ukraine it is more likely that they will directly engage Russia in the future. This would bring about the doomsday you fear.
@@moviequotemasta have the same feeling but don't worry if it Happens we all die together mate 💪🏻
A true wake up call. We need responsible leadership
Citizens of countries threatening nuclear war should revolt and take out the current leadership to prevent such a trajectory future
Great video. Ty
it’s really scary to think that a nuclear war could kill the same amount of people as all of world war 2 in just 8 hours
Absolutely right... Just imagine the devastation... 😳
Switzerland: I think staying neutral won't work this time.
south america stonks
@@burezinho6261 new zealand
Thats right.
But what can we do ?
We don’t even have Nuclear Warheads.
Switzerland is not neutral anymore
There’s the moon
Imagine being on the ISS while this is going on. Would be a insane thing to see from above.
Astronaut: Yo Jeremy you seeing this? The cities are shining extra bright!
Americans and Russians on the ground: ☠️⚰️☢️
Americans and Russians on the ISS: 😝☕🍿
@@karlovsky_ More like horrified because they know they're going to die in space.
@@holy8782 They can evacuate the station in every moment, and probably they could even manage to land their pod in New Zealand or some other radiation-free-ish area
@@muspells actually they can,so it's pretty safe XD
The scary part is the unknowns. For example the tsar bomba if used as initially designed would be devastating, imagine a 100MT nuke being set off at sea and resulting tsunami not to mention the emp effects
EMP effects are limited within the standard nuclear arsenal. Most detonations occur several thousand feet above ground to maximize the effect of the blast wave. EMP effects are local or regional depending on the weapon used. Of course, a continental barrage extends the effects... but, if EMP were the goal, detonations would occur several hundred miles above ground using specialized lower yield nukes that provide better EMP effects over a much larger area. I don't remember the yield, but it was relatively small compared to a lot of arsenals, but if something like a 300Kt nuke were detonated 480 miles above central US, it would take ouf the grid in about a dozen or more states.
... but, like I said... if it's a global launch, EMP is the last of anyone's worries.
Bombs dont do a ton in water, water is much much denser than air and a hell of a lot more difficult for a wave to travel through
The truth about the big H bombs of the 50s and 60s is that they were impractical in combat (they were made with slow heavy bombers that would be easily shot down in mind, so the theory was that the last few bombers could destroy all targets by themselves), with ICBMs, that is no longer an issue.
Also another main reason for their power was for propaganda (like a lot of impractical or ridiculous weapons).
Спасибо за публикацию плана мероприятия. Предупредите меня за пару недель до начала, чтобы я могла взять отпуск.
Хитрая Александра))
Отпуск в Зеландию?
@@avsadeyt Нидерланды скорее всего будут уничтожены в этом сценарии
@@gyrow1684 Нидерланды - это понятно, Европа. А он(а) говорит про Новую Зеландию
@@yourbigfan1777 Я в шутку написал это. Зеландия - это часть Нидерландов, и Новая Зеландия была названа в честь этого места
Considering the current events….it was nice meeting you guys
I will die among the first, haha
you are already dead ludwig
I just want a vacation first. It kind of seems like working now might be dumb - it's all gonna burn.
Time to make sure your right with Jesus, eternity could be just around the corner. God bless.
@@ShandaMichelle1 true that
This simulation is very optimistic for the nuclear winter casualties.
The casualties in the long term will be 99%. If not more. And that goes for animals and plants too.
I would say that specially for the war part into the US. Similarly to RF, there's absolutely no chance that the whole nation wouldn't be glassed.
We won’t have nuclear winter even if we explose all the nuclear bombs
@@fab9992 what are you talking about? Scientist are already predicting global cooling for a few years because of the volcano that exploded earlier. Just one volcano!
@@killdozer3464 à valcona is more powerful than a nuclear bomb, isn’t it ?
Countries that didn't have nukes didn't get nuked. I wonder if that means something.
I mean... There's no reason for it... But that's a good point... What do you ALL think? Would countries without nukes would get nuked anyway?
@@KrissyNottyim polish, and i'll bet you any money that poland would get leveled by nukes if it comes to worst. Same goes for other nato countries not possessing nucelar weapons but with any strategic military or civilian infastructure, it wouldn't mean much
@@avegromek that's true... All NATO member states are likely going to be targeted 😕 But what about South America, and the whole of Africa? Would any countries down there would be nuked? 😮
@EcuaVoz No, they wouldn't, but any countries that rely on fertiliser, farming equipment, and food imports from any of the countries nuked would most likely experience a severe famine that could kill hundreds of millions easily. Not to mention other effects on the global economy and global cooling. Africa and alot of South America is one of those areas that would be effected the most specifically Africa. Argentina and South Africa would mabye fair the best since they are food exporters they create a surplus of food. But the rest would starve more might die than the nukes caused.
@@KrissyNotty Even though the countries aren't nuked they will still be affected, and the planet will die eventually. You explain this in your video😀
2023 here. Wow I got chills with how realistic and accurate this is two years later.
Couldn't agree more, brother.
Have I missed the nuclear war? How is it any more realistic or accurate now?
@@TrueFilter russia started a war with ukraine and is threatening to use nukes. While they mentioned in the video that russia would most likely start it, and it would be between russia and nato. Ukraine is joining nato and nato is helping them a lot so….
@@TrueFilterThe longer the war goes on the more it escalates the more the escalates the higher the chance of nuclear weapons being used
@@TrueFilterfr lol
Had I come across this vid a couple of weeks ago, it would've been quite entertaining. Now, it's just like an omen.
Scary, isn't it?
After seeing this i just cant see it happening. No, wont happen. If Putin wants to start this, there is not a chance that his generals wouldnt stop him. Nope, wont happen.
Yes, considering we are (based on what ive heard) at defcon 2
@@ThorSuzuki1 I had the exact opposite experience. I always thought it was impossible to happen. Now i'm having second thoughts.
Minecraft Bad Omen Effect
2022 : "And you thought COVID sucked"
😅 Come on...
russia: HE HE HE HA (clash royale king laugh)
Yeah now covid is forgotten and we have propaganda of each sides,now having to obey people with psychological disorders we have now to give our lives for people that dont even care if our children would survive a bombing ,nice work Nato Russia you have our lives at stake and? We all want peace .
Well i said before, better to have COVID than WWIII...
Yeah but now nobody gives a fuck about it anymore and they terrorized us with restaurants holidays nightlife and now they are like
Fuck life we gotta see whats going on!!
Like they had press before in warzones prob you would get shot in the head if you would go with a camera at a battlefield
Nice content. To me trading the forex and crypto market is way better than any online investment
@Robert John I agree with your sentiments.
I'm yet to see the backtested results in my trading account, so I'm also working on being more aggressive in adding to winners....
Thanks
Cryptocurrency has become a lucrative way of earning nowadays if traded well, my spouse invested heavily in it. And he weekly returns are guaranteed.
How does this trading stuff work? am really interested but just don't know how to go about it heard people really make it huge trading
Even if a simulation and most likley speculative, the world having close to enough nuclear weapons to attack itself for a whole day is flavergasting.
6 hours in and it’s already surpassed WW2’s casualties. Very terrifying
Has it fuck millions died in ww2. Millions havnt died yet in the Ukraine war .
and this is a very "mild" simulation
@@kinghankus they’re talking about the sim not current events
HEY yUNGS PEOPLES ! DONT GET CHILDRENS ! Don t get childrens ! DONT GET CHILDRENS AND ANY FAMILY ! DONT GET MORE HUMANS , good for us and for nature ,,,,,,WOMANS AND MANS : STOP TO DREAM WHIT PERFECT FAMILY ,,,,, DONT GET MORE HUMANS ,,,,,THINK ABAOUT THIS !
And ww2 was a 6 year long war
2016 : Seriously it doesn’t get worse than that.
2020 : Well I guess I was wrong
2022 : Brah…
@@Ferris.Bueller 🤣
😂😂
2049: Blade Runner (Nexus 8) 😎😂
Brub it wasn't even made in 2020 it was i. 2021
You tweaking 2016 is widely appreciated as the best year
Nuclear Winter!!!
☢☢☢☢
The worst part of it all 😳
Can we play a game?
The only winning move is not play, my friend 😌
Wargames reference.. good classic
@@KrissyNottycould you re do this with japan and asean included please?
Albert Einstein was absolutely right when he said "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones".
@Untrepid One Except tjey would also die, but not from the direct attack, rather from radiation sickness, freezing to death and starvation.
@Untrepid One As others have said, this simulation is extremely optimistic in terms of casualties. The count would most definitely be well into the billions. Homes, technology, mass amounts of crops and freshwater, among other supplies, will all be lost, leaving more people dying as a result, and others killing each other for supplies.
Surprise surprise, Einstein contributed to the weapon that will be used in WW3 😂
Except it's a stupid quote and I wish people would stop regurgitating it. The scenario has to involve the rise of new nations that, in turn, also march down the road to war but still haven't developed past using wood and rocks? I know what he was trying to say but he should have just said world war 4 would be permanently cancelled after 3.
The most underrated cause of death is going to be clean water. Or, rather, a lack of it.
Plumbing and water treatment is one of those things you don’t really think about until you have to. You can live over a month with no food, but you’re dead in a few days without water. And almost everyone in the world lives along the cost where the water is salted/scarce and the population density is high.
My boss: “I still need you to come in on Monday. “
🤣🤣🤣
might be a tad late
Hahahahaha
Lmao underrated comment!! If not, your boss is going to need a doctor's note🤣🤣🤣
Very biased towards NATO, given Russian has more warheads than all NATO combined :)
I subscribed to this channel exclusively due to this simulation. I also took the liberty of sharing this video alongside my research, resulting in millions of impressions on my Twitter. Undoubtedly, it stands as one of the most exceptional simulations in my life.
I'm glad that it helped you with your research! Just remember to give credit to EcuaVoz okay darling? 🥺❤️
@@KrissyNotty Your brand and link are perfectly intact in my article. I am confident that you must have received a significant number of views through it.
Wow thank you so much for that! 😊🙏❤️
Meanwhile the Penguins of Antarctica rule what’s left
They will be our overlords after a nuclear war
Imagine those little suckers with them tiny wings ruling the earth... I'll be damned
@@KrissyNotty wonk wonk!
I say, let's nuke the penguins first, then we can be sure we won't have penguin overlords ruling the earth
Made my blood boil thinking about it
.
.
.
.
Just kidding 😂
I am pleased to see that one of the first strikes in the UK seems to be centered on my house. 👍
Why are you pleased to see that?
@@KrissyNotty at least he’ll die first and won’t suffer lol
@@KrissyNotty I would rather die instantly than die a slow terrifying death in the aftermath of an all out nuclear war.
You hit the Lottery, I'm close to a Nuclear plant, I'm going to glow for a while...
@@brucepartington6226 oh God you're right.
Go out just like that instead of having to witness it all.
where did you get the background music?
I don't know whether this is realistic or not, but in stage 3 Nuclear Winter, if those temperatures would be correct, the casualites would be more like above 80 or 90 percent of the global population. Where I live, it would be -76 degrees celsius, and most probably at this stage all major power plants are out. So no electricity. I don't think most people, myself included would last longer than a few days at half this temperature without power, and even with power, at -76 degrees celsius no-ones home or heating system is built for this.
I think the only ones who would survive this would be people with access to military grade fallout shelters. So the same bastards that caused the situation would be the only survivors.
I'm fairly certain the death count would ramp up exponentially in the years following the war due to starvation.
Yep race for food water and supplies would destroy everything, countries may divide into small communities trying to survive, small conflicts and local wars may occur, legal foundations of anything would collapse, corruption of authorities would be at an all time high, crime from theft to kidnapping to rape would be common, it would all be a big mess... Basically a return to the middle ages, the few remaining humans would have to start from there to rebuild civilization with the few resources remaining from the nuclear winter, and we were already struggling with earth's current resources... Might not even be possible, humanity may just die out in the end
@@MrDeath5300 humanity will die out eventually no matter what ^^
Why? There would be so many radioactive corpses to feast on.. already cooked too...
@@thothheartmaat2833 Vaporized !!!!
@@vicosdivicos you just gotta go to the right distance from the blast radius.. some will be well done.. and then the farther you to there will be a certain amount of medium rare.. THATS MY TERF SO STAY OUT!!!!!
Looks like something we should avoid!
Agrred
Tell that to Pootin!
@@sunyboymafu6149 except NATO isn't hostile towards Russia.
@@lmao.3661 Russia should be ok with Nato's plans to deploy missiles in Ukraine
@@sunyboymafu6149 again, it falls apart when you realise NATO is doing everything in it's power to _not_ start a war with Russia while still giving security to the nations surrounding it. if NATO was aggressive we'd be fighting a third world war right now. the only thing causing hostilities is Russia itself.
And the sad part is, the countries won't ever give up their nukes. It's like having a gun, no one will mess with you but if someone else has a gun, you won't be too eager to put yours away due to distrust in the other person.
Excellent analogy 😳
Just a question. Does this situation take into account "the rule of seven for fallout radiation". Yes or no.
As many people have said, "nobody wins in a nuclear war."
Except new zealand's and argentineans
Russia : if I can’t win. No one will
I mean, Russia lost more people and had less to begin with soo..
@@bengie3657 nuclear fallout will not spare them
@@rogertruong5751 USA, if I can not control everything, I will destroy everything
This video scares me a lot more today in 2022 than it did when I saw it in 2020.
Then move to Moscow or Washington DC before the year 2023 and all your worries will disappear in a matter of nano seconds(if so)☠lol
im from south america
Very common with like 90% people. It gets more attention, when its actual. But when its happening, its too late to change. You also don't pay attention to cancer, untill they find you one.
Like this dude K n o w s how this would turn out. LOL NOT !
these nuclear war videos are popping up in my feed. im guessing because of all of the talk about it, especially by Russia saying it will use its nukes if threatened by NATO.
As an AI language model, I can provide a general overview of a hypothetical nuclear war simulation between NATO and Russia. However, it is crucial to note that discussing or promoting violence, including nuclear war, is highly irresponsible and against OpenAI's use-case policy. This response aims to provide purely informative content without endorsing or encouraging any form of violence or conflict.
In a nuclear war simulation scenario between NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and Russia, one must understand that the use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences for both sides and the entire world. Nuclear war is widely considered an existential threat due to its potential for causing widespread destruction and loss of life.
NATO is a collective defense alliance formed by North American and European countries, while Russia is a nuclear-armed nation with significant military capabilities. In any real-world conflict scenario, it is essential for nations to prioritize diplomatic negotiations, peaceful resolutions, and arms control agreements to avoid the devastating consequences of nuclear war.
Should a nuclear war simulation occur, it would involve highly advanced computer models and algorithms to simulate the potential outcomes of a nuclear exchange. These simulations would include various factors such as missile capabilities, defense systems, strategic targets, and possible countermeasures.
However, it is important to reiterate that the use of nuclear weapons should be avoided at all costs. The consequences of a nuclear war would be far-reaching and long-lasting, affecting not only the involved nations but also causing significant humanitarian, environmental, and economic impacts globally.
Promoting peace, dialogue, and cooperation among nations is crucial to prevent any potential conflicts from escalating into nuclear war. International organizations such as the United Nations play a vital role in fostering peaceful resolutions and promoting disarmament efforts to reduce the risk of such catastrophic events.
most likely the bombs would be Air burts which increases damage but decreases fallout. Most likely radiation wouldn't be a big deal.
Frankly, this is stunningly optimistic compared to other analysis I’ve seen
Scary times were in m8 future looks so terrifying rather it happens or not inflation and economic collapse is also what were on the brink of
I hate to seem to downplay this, but i would say youre right. under a billion TOTAL deaths, even WITH Nuclear Winter? I don't see how even half of humanity survives such a Thing...
Stunningly optimistic?! This is the only simulation video I've seen, and is quite far fron being optimistic to me. Can't imagine what others are predicting. D:
@@JavierAndresAnd yeah all things considered only 200 million more then the entire population of the United States of America isn’t that much considering the mass destruction that a nuclear war is
@@NorthTonawanda1 welp you may have to live in Southern Africa as that’s the only place far enough from the war that’s hospitable enough for the forseable future as we all know the land down under and the America barely anyone cares about won’t do it for the human race
One of the scariest games I own is DEFCON. The fact it's just you playing a simulation of nuclear war is chilling. Because as long as nuclear weapons exist it's legitimately a possibility that "game" could happen. The end of matches is chilling to the bone, because whether you win or lose, it's just silence and the end screen results showing how many are dead and that there's nothing left.
I felt this
I love DEFCON, such a good game
Reddit moment
@@xdweito1952 lmao but how is this a reddit moment? 😭
I played a Defcon match that ended with zero losses.
How do you make this kind of simulation?
I live in Vancouver Canada. I would have nowhere to go. Totally stuck in the middle.
We are very close to this becoming a reality, we humans are too confrontational and too dumb to avoid this. Nuclear weapons were a big mistake.
We're not anywhere near it, calm down.
Blame einstein
Blame einstein for being too smart and dumb at the same time
We got lucky during the Cuban missile crisis and again in 1986, when a Russian satellite mistakenly detected sunrise for a nuclear warhead from the West. Eventually, we will run out of luck.🤣🤣
@@ferdyanalbert7073 John Cockcroft and Ernest Walton split the atom.. Einstein theorised that it was possible.
Did they get the spider tho
Hahaha I'm going to pin the comment 😅
LOL
@Aidan Anthony Garcia it is just a joke.
@Aidan Anthony Garcia i think it fled to Australia 😂😂😂
@@demonreaper97 I think we have a problem. The fallout mutated the spider, now it's more bigger and vicuous more than ever
Okay why did you have to set this on my birthday? Its crazy
This isn't even close to a worst case scenario. Let's repeat the simulation, dividing the earth into two alliances with equal population. First World (US, NATO and their allies) vs Second world (China, Russia and their allies) and every nuclear warhead is used. I would predict basically a Thanos is done to our planet when it's all over.
The scariest part of this scenario right now is that NATO and Russia are on high alert, which significantly increase the likelihood of a nuclear launch "mistake". I think this is a real possibility.
Welcome to the Second Cold War.
@@Xpistos510 this cold war many end very quickly into conventional/nuclear war
Unfortunately, you're right.
No. Wrong. NATO is not on high alert. Only Russia declared it. The west decided to ignore that statement for now. They have intelligence telling them if it's a bluff or not.
@forest love Until NATO and Russia are literally shooting at each other, its the second cold war. Russia went for Ukraine because it's counting on allies staying out of the conflict.
Just goes to show how foolish a nuclear threat really is.
It shows how foolish it is to start a war with a nuclear force like Russia.
@@jumpingonly3386
Yeah, let's just ignore who's the aggressor here and put all the blame on NATO because we're a bunch of delusional retards who buy into Russian propaganda, as a matter of fact, Russia is solely responsible for starting this war and they are 100% in the wrong here.
@@jumpingonly3386 Russia is at war with only one country, war of which it is the agressor. Putin flaunts nuclear threats like its candy and its scary
@@azogticmettroskik8904 Sure buddy, if Russia was putting missiles and other weapons in Mexico, arming their population, and trying to get them to join the new USSR I am sure the U.S. would just sit there and let it happen, they definitely wouldn't invade...
Are you sure your not the one that is propagandized?
@@miguelpadeiro762 Russia stated it sees the sanctions as economic war declerations and Russia picked up the challenge..
>russia to be most likely to begin a nuclear war
quite rich when the USA was the only country in the world that actually begun a nuclear war
Things have changed a little bit since WW2... Almost a DECADE ago 👀
@@KrissyNotty*century
Haha you got me 😆😅
@@KrissyNotty the worst part was that japan was actually ready to negotiate a surrender. USA just did it out of flex and japan simply used it as a convenient public excuse for surrender
This might be a stupid question, but is this on a game?
putin putting his nuclear forces on high alert is less of a threat to ukraine itself and more of a statement to the world telling them to stay out of it. its really messed up when you think of it.
It is messed up... Like a school bully threatening others to finish beating up a smaller kid. It's disgusting even
America does the same shit. They setup lies to invade. All sides play dirty.
They’re pretty much holding Ukraine hostage…
Nukes are on high alert all the time in their entire existence in order to be able to retaliate before being vaporized. This is nothing but scare tactics from a declining, inferior man.
@@Appolo15966 if u ask me NATO should enter Ukraine and defend it,,lets see what litle gnome says about that.Russians would hang him on main square in moscow and another thing,i dont think russian generals would fire nuclear,so its a empty thret if u ask me...we should go there and kick his ass asap
Watching this in 2020: "We are already seeing what a pandemic can cause, no one can be this crazy, the cold war has ended and there would be no more threats."
28 Feb 2022: "Right."
I hope you're right
@@antonceta1 hope for what ? The war in Ukraine has started 2022 Feb 28. Russians invaded Ukraine
@@Aerodynamical_ But, nothing has gone nuclear. "Yet"
This reminded me " The war that end all wars" in WW1
@@Aerodynamical_ so what?
Russia doesn't need nuclear bombs to get rid of Nazi in Ukraine.
It is to make sure that NATO is scared to death so they won't continue spread their weapons all over other countries near Russia, since NATO threatens Russia, you know
As a turkish person I think this would stop the Inflation
U are thinked wrong İnflation will be in nuclear War and after %1 million :(
"A strange game,the only winning move is not to play."
- Joshua
"How about a nice game of chess?"
This is one video I really hope doesn't age well.
0:31 Simulation engine v1990.03.28 that is the date of software development
28th of March 1990.
Can we trust to simplified algorithm? Gadgets which were made 25-30 years later has much more computing power than computer hardware before 1991.
In that global war China. India, Audtralia, Brasile, South Africa Republic, Japan, South Korea would be hited also. Reason not to let them dominate in future.
On the contrary, if this video ages for a long time then it means nuclear war never happened.
It doesn't. Anyone who has the slightest serious background in political science know that's just a Hollywood doomsday scenario as realistic as a sensational Big Foot footage
@Sophia Marques superpowers throwing around nukes to annihilate humanity is as much as a hoax as bigfoot even in the 60's. It was a fun 80's movies though, even then they were fully conscious that it's science fiction. Now in 2022 it just like any other conspiracy theories
The 'Russia as the primarily guilty power' has aged well so far. But yes, let's hope for the peak of the problems to be already reached.
The fact that this was made a year ago but feels like we're inching closer to this reality. Praying for this to never happen and RIP to those who fought bravely.
Cant pray for something not to happen if its in the control of human hands, begging seems more appropriate. But instead of doing all of that we should be prepping and staying strong.
This is certenly going to start one day, The Nuclear War. Hope it doesn't start in our times. There will be unimaginable Havoc round the globe.. It is said that stone age will come back to earth.. Only Almighty Allah can save all of us.
@@muminshah No, Iron Age mythology and invisible friends are the very last things we can turn to. We must turn to reason, Science, logic, and empathy to save ourselves from destruction.
@@ungrdfan9913 Precisely. Praying accomplishes nothing. Facts Over Feelings.
@@VesperAegis everything that is happening around us is mentioned in our religion.. And it is our belief that everything will happen accordingly as described in our religion Islam.. And only Almighty Allah can save us..
USA, europe and russia: are in a nuclear war
South america, africa, asia, and australia: hold my popcorns
Asside from the nations directly involded in the conflict, the areas most affected by the breakdown of the global economy + envormental effects would probably be Africa and the Middle East (due to the political instability and the lack fo food security). Oceania, South East Asia (if an US vs China don't happen) and South America would probably be the least affected. Ironically, South America would be the ideal place to be when considering food security and stability: the continent is relatively isolated from the rest of the world (so, mass migration refugies would be more difficult) and though the nuclear winter would affect how effective crops wield are, the continent would still be in the best position to produce food. Also, countries like Brazil and Argentina (which produce food in excess for export) would probably cancel/block the export of stored grains in order to ensure the supply for the internal market. The first year would be the most difficult due to lower temperatures, but most models point for temperatures to start rizing back to "normal" within a decade.
I think these casualty reports are optimistic at best. They don't really factor in the effects of a complete collapse in infrastructure, government, and society in general. Not to mention the global effects of having some countries completely wiped off the map.
That doesn't matter.
Were all gonna die.
Purge
Yes Russia as country will get like literally destroid, when over 60% of its population died in 24 hours and even more will in the Russian Nuclear Winter, while west lost under 10% of their population, so they will survive after hard blow. I think Russian survivors will flee Russia by then, when its just abondoned wasteland then where is like nothing anymore, when all the major Russian cities are destroid with hugh amount of dead people and then its just cold countryside that cant operate in its own, when so cold Nuclear Winter then and Russians get no elecrcity anymore for living, when power plants also destroid.
@@jout738 your thinking is not too clear then. This simulation is way off, the west would have all of its main cities destroyed , not just military targets within the first 1-2 hours. The Russians also have crazy contingency weapons to poison with radioactive waste the pacific ocean in case it's leadership is taken out.
And many many more other crazy things, none of that taken into consideration in this simple sim
How do you know they don't?
3 WW2 casualties in just 24 hours.
That's no small number...
@@KrissyNotty if only two small bombs on Japan killed 400,000 people at the same moment, what would 14,000 nuclear bombs 100 times more powerful than those two bombs do?
If each bomb is only capable of killing 200,000 people,
200,000 * 14,000 =?
this means that 14,000 bombs will kill at least 2,800,000,000 at the same moment.
@@expectation0 nope, Hiroshima killed 50,000 nagasaki 70k. But I got your point
Yolocaust
I read that right? World War TWO?
If there will ever be something like that, I hope I won't be a contemporary. Better to die of old age than this. I think that even those in the anti-atomic bunkers will not escape in the end because at some point they will run out of resources and when they come to the surface they will not find anything.
Есть замечательная серия книг С.С.Тармашева: "Древний". Он описал возможный апокалипсис очень подробно.
А еще луче в его книге "Каждому свое"
Надеюсь, он подумал, что это плохая идея.
I pray this will never happen, there's so much beauty in our planet but only a few old men has the power to destroy that beauty, it's so sad and depressing that we reached this kind of savageness and brutality 😞
It is depressing... They live comfortably and the rest of the world has to pay the consequences 😞
the planet will be fine. we won't
I totally agree. No one has the right to destroy the earth and all life on it 🙁
And woman too.
No need to exclude woman anymore.
Yup, and for what?? To have power over the dirt beneath your feet.
That's a good simulation, but there are some factors that you didn't show, but the affect the simulation:
1. Russia is in a defensive alliance named ODKB(CSTO), whose members are Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Only Russia has the nuclear weapons, but all of the countries have strategical military objects, such as radars, satellite control centers, even a spaceport(Baikonur, Kazakhstan). So, these countries' military sites and major cities will be nuked as well.
2. Nuclear fallout will result in much more casualties due to the nature of the radioactive dust. If inhaled or contacted with skin, it will start necrosis of any type of organic. And because this dust will be basically everywhere and the supply of protective clothing such as hazmat suits and gasmasks, medical supplies and essential goods is very limited, possible casualties will be enormous, probably hundreds of millions. And another fact, that these particles ionize two types of radiation at the same time, alpha- and beta-rays, which have different characteristics, will make our planet inhabitable in a very short time. Brief explanation:
Alpha-rays(actually particles emitted) have a very small amplitude range, which is counted in micrometers, and have very poor penetration capability. But the damage they cause is extra high. They should not be able to contact organics in any way, otherwise - relatively fast and very, VERY painful death.
Beta-rays(particles as well) have longer emitting range and better penetrating capability. These are the most dangerous of the all three types of radiation exposure. They can fly as far as 1 meter and penetrate most of the common clothing, also ionizing the surface they collide with, especially metals. Must not be contacted either.
Going with that, we can say that all the surface on Earth, as well as the ocean, will be ionizing radiation in such doses that no organic can live in. But it will vent off in some time, as dirt absorbes the fallout and alpha- and beta-particles will not be in range of their activity.
3. Disruption of the global economy will lead into the arrival of the last horseman of the apocalypse - famine. People will die out of hunger and fight to death for a loaf of bread. Chaos, basically. Not to mention the local conflicts that will escalate because of this.
4. Drastic undercut in medical supplies and consumer goods. More like an addition to the third factor, but let it be here.
5. Water and air intoxication. Addition to number 2.
Not like I'm trying to bullshit your work, it's an amazing video, but I'm just adding a bit of salty criticism to your sweet video. Best of luck to you! Hoping you will make another video like that.
I think you are quite a reasonable person, we had a wave from the liberal agenda in Russia (according to the majority, I would compare it as 99.99/100 consider them controlled by NATO or the West) so the wave carried the crazy idea that nuclear weapons are not so dangerous and generally not scarier than a conventional kalibr missile. This alerted me, and I am interested to know whether there was a similar justification of the devil in the West itself or NATO
думаю ты вполне разумный человек, у нас в России была волна со стороны либеральной повестки ( по мнению подовляющего большенства, я бы сравнил это как 99,99/100 считают их подконтрольными НАТО или же западу) так вот волна несла в себе безумную мысль того что ядерное оружие не так опасно и вообще не страшнее обычной ракеты "калибр". Это меня насторожило, и мне интересно узнать было ли подобное оправдание дьявола в самом западе или же НАТО
@@shaxov95 Well, as I actively talk about such topics with my friends on the West, I can suppose that they have seen some attempts to basically justify nuclear weapons as a conventional one. But it didn't go any further than some podcast talk or shitty TV-show. So, don't take it seriously. Anyway, what matters is that you and your friends and family know what hell of a thing a nuke is.
@@shaxov95 saying that the west is the devil describe how you are getting controlled by the propaganda.
No, in the west there is not a single person who minimize the nuclear weapons.
Probably you are getting confused by another argument: nuclear weapons are useless (not only dangerous), why? Because the western technology is so advanced that they have missiles who are more precise than a nuclear bomb without the radioactive factor but with the same destructive power.
If we assume that the vast majority of the nukes used in a nuclear war are strategic nukes and not tactical nukes, radiation wouldn’t be the biggest concern. Tactical nukes are thermonuclear weapons that have a larger blast radius than its radiation radius. Also, the radioactivity of the fallout decreases very fast, so most people outside city centers would be mostly fine from radiation after a few weeks. The fallout would increase cancer rates and miscarriages, but it wouldn’t lead to acute radiation sickness after a short amount of time (assuming anyone is alive close enough to a city center or strategic target).
@@8is strategic nukes are not nukes. They are still nukes and launching them would be a suicide pact
Edit- I hurt my head trying to decipher this after I re-read it months later, why does it have 7 likes.
Safest area to go is Antarctica. There is some canned food there, maybe you would survive for a year.
Took "You'll all be dead" to a whole new level
The problem with this simulation is that 95% of the nukes use in such a war will be fired in less than 1 hour.
@mike chestnut no it also didn split when the asteroid fell that wiped ot the dinosaurs. Which had the power of 10 billion nukes.
@@shanillozijderveld4690 geschichten ausm paulanergarten. erde ist flach
@oneuniquegregyr war mir doch klar das sich jemand meldet :D war spaß junge^^
@mike chestnut you need at least the moon which is billions and billions time more powerfull
False.
I don't agree with the scenario where bombs are dropped for 24 hours. The strategy is to release the whole stock as they will be lost when the bombs released by the enemy arrive. This phase would be no longer than 2 hours, taken in account submarines that would make retaliatory strikes as soon as possible.
Yeah the whole conflict with only last a few hours and those who were survive would be back in the stone age no doubt about it
This is scary :(
Extremely parochial attack scenario however, serious consideration needs to be given to covert weaponry to encompass far more countries, casualties.
How can they launch that much nuke,bombing strategicl
@@1mingameplay75 but true
Russia started? Seriously? Everyone knows perfectly well who on our planet starts conflicts. And the conflict in Ukraine is no exception. So Russia did not start World War III. But she will finish it. Maybe even as shown in this video.
Keep dreaming,Won't be a mile usable if Russia goes to nuclear war.Won't even want caviar from nuclear cooling lake or ocean.Russia quit treaty so no restrictions on anything.
Why the strike in Saskatchewan? One of the first strikes looks like it hits Regina or Saskatoon
The amount of work that went into making this video is incredible 👏🏻 I wish it hadn't aged quite as well as it did 😕
Thank you for your comment, I appreciate it very much 😊
@@KrissyNotty why have you included nuclear winter in your simulation? It has already been debunked by modern official simulations and the original scientists who conducted the experiment have admitted that they skewed their numbers to portray a much more apocalyptic effect then what is actually possible and that the reason they did this was to convince others not to use nuclear weapons( a scare tactic). I do not support the use or existence of nuclear war but I also do not support misinformation, fear mongering, and inciting panic. Was it your intent to spread the same propaganda they tried to spread all those years ago?
i think it would be a lot scarier if you showed the ICBM launch trails, anyone else?
I wanted to, but then the screen got all cluttered and you couldn't see anything below the ICBM launch paths 😢
@@KrissyNotty What if you made them partially transparent
that’s what makes it scary though, there is such a large amount of nuclear weapons that you wouldn’t see the map if the trails were visible
☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️
Do you fear of impending nuclear doom?
Then fear no more!
Radioactisaurus is here!
Where everyday is radioactive day!
☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️
No shit Sherlock
At 0.75 speed it’s the Subnautica PDA voice
oh man this forces me to go back where I came from Vietnam 1975.
switzerland : im invincible
The perks of being friends of everyone 🙂
@@KrissyNotty switzerland has not been neutral anymore for a long time now. they are accomplices of the Zelenski regime.
Everyone will be affected by the nuclear war. If it's not from a blast itself, it's from the nuclear fallout or winter
But now it's de-facto member of NATO so it should be destroyed too.
*Red sun starts to play*
The effort you put in to this is appreciated.
Thank you for your comment 😊
get yourself a game called defcon - everything is a lot better in there, also his animation is silly - he does not account for any kind of defense.
And suspicious
Nice pun!
The womans voice is the voice for this. Its like God's voice.
I liked the nuclear war simulation
video. That outcome of nuclear conflict is why we must avoid nuclear war.
you know I’ve been thinking about this for like a week now and I think I’ve came up with a solution for nuclear war -
don’t
just don’t do it in the first place
After watching this video in the middle of the Ukraine word it’s safe to say my anxiety it’s gonna kill me first.
These are anxious times for everyone 😳🥺
Don't take your life for granted. Enjoy each day you're given. Don't live in fear.
Please protect yourself. I hope you'll be safe.
Stay safe out there
:(
Whats terifying about this for me personally is the fact that not everybody dies, meaning that its not a 100% annihilation of the whole Earth. I could then see why certain elites would risk a nuclear war if there seems to be a chance for survival
They would still be seriously affected, being rich is almost inconsequential if you're only a handful remaining alive.
The only thing that would have value would be clean water and food.
That’s why space stations and bunkers have become so prevalent. Also a reason the Denver airport was made
@@thirien59 what do you mean only a handful? thats your American propaganda talking, didnt you listen to the scenario?
there will only be 500 million deaths, thats why they have heirloom seed banks, this will usher in the new world order, reset the new global
economy rebuild a new society.
you think this is the first time in history this has happened, the elites are planning to close this book out and start afresh, like the egyptians, romans persions
all ended with this will be ours.
Population control .They have their bunkers
Since I'm trapped where I'm at I'll be on my balcony watching it all with my best Nicolas Cage smile into the sun.
I just don't see how it would get to -20 on the equator during 'nuclear winter'
Some of you have been asking me to clarify a few things about this video, so here are some answers:
1️⃣ Yes, the simulation takes into account defensive systems such as missile interceptors, that's why the US and NATO Allies don't get hit as badly as Russia.
2️⃣ The simulation is about a nuclear war between Russia and NATO, so China and other countries would not have compelling reasons to get involved.
3️⃣ The nuclear blasts are a little bit exaggerated to be more easily visible. That's the same reason why I didn't show the ballistic traces: just for a better visibility.
4️⃣ The amount of deaths may seem low, but keep in mind that this simulation goes barely a year into the war. Radiation effects could show years after exposure, so deaths at a later point in time could be much greater (in the billions).
5️⃣ Russia has only a handful of hypersonic missiles, so that would not give them the upper hand on the conflict.
6️⃣ And more importantly: this is a SIMULATION. It's incredibly difficult to predict an event with so many variables. The possible outcomes are infinite. However, this is the most likely scenario I managed to get from machine learning software. And as you can see: it literally predicted what we are seeing today (that Russia was most likely to begin an act of war that could end up in a nuclear conflict). Nevertheless, your opinions and takes on this video are important and I appreciate all your comments.
⚠️ Remember to watch these other two videos related to the Russian invasion of Ukraine:
🔴 Russian invasion of Ukraine war simulation - predictions:
ua-cam.com/video/fUPlWa7Ti2M/v-deo.html
🔴 Russia vs Ukraine: Military power comparison (2022):
ua-cam.com/video/5LVU-MT1DAI/v-deo.html
Okei isi❤️🔥🏳️🌈🏳️🌈
Oh sweet, thanks! The UA-cam Algorithm just got me here lol
Pole
This is cool, great job, very entertaining. Could you give more information about the parameters you used? It seemed to me like you predicted extremely high interception rates and a low overall amount of launches. In addition, I struggle to make sense of temperatures between -45 and -90 in a belt containing about 4 billion people who are not used to such temperatures and have no real infrastructure to withstand it en masse only resulting in about 10% casualties.
lol ABM would not be nearly that effective even in the wildest dreams of the SDI... ABM technology is unreliable and still in a very early stage. Its laughable that AEGIS or THAAD would be that effective. As I mentioned in another comment Russian ICBM have huge throw weight and many decoys making the idea of this mass interception even worse. in reality the USA is going to be hammered and receive most of those ICBM. Russia has tons of IRBM, cruise missiles etc to hit Europe with. Grossly underestimating NATO casualties this is just so ridiculous lmfao
I would gladly accept conventional wars again if this meant getting rid of nukes.
That's basically what Russia is "supposedly" "trying" to do
When you think about it, Nukes have kept us all safer for 80 years. The worst wars on earth happened before Nuclear bombs. Nukes so far have kept everyone from going to major wars with each other. You have smaller skirmishes, but no world wars so far.
Nukes are the only reason why we're not currently drafted for WW4 or 5, What is happening in Ukraine would have been the fate of Europe in the 60s in a world without those.
They're also the reason why the main dictatorial powers are still here, the questions are:
-Who would win this war
-Would there be others
In the best case scenario, as in "not them" and "no", would the death toll justify it? As of now nuclear holocaust deaths are still an if, the dead of war a reality.
I'd say yes, but this is only the best scenario, an unlikely one. Constant threat of mutual annihilation is the price for the closest thing our specie ever experienced of world peace.
I personally rather have a thousand conventional wars then just one nuke war because nuke wars are not a "if" but a "when" and "when" that happens it will make any conventional wars look like a sport.
Fuck that
Hypothetical: what happens if a nuclear warhead is detonated say in tha center of a carrier strike group, same question for a group of aircraft in transit consisting of fighters, AWACS and maybe a tanker...?
Would this be an effective tactic ?