Introduction to Philosophy Lecture #4: Metaphysics & Philosophy of Science - Aristotle

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 кві 2014

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @WisdomisPower-10inminute-dn5no
    @WisdomisPower-10inminute-dn5no 6 місяців тому +1

    Your perspectives are incredibly valuable and resonate with the content I've been creating. Great to be part of this knowledgeable community.

  • @bryanfisk7904
    @bryanfisk7904 2 місяці тому

    The 4 causes introduction was really useful in particular when reading other philosophers explaination of non-phsycical attributes.

  • @whatdupdoh
    @whatdupdoh 4 роки тому +11

    I wonder what Brian's up to these days.

  • @morbidity7175
    @morbidity7175 6 років тому +9

    Very interesting, I really enjoy this series.
    Something I noticed is that even in modern English -- albeit not so much in everyday spoken English -- 'cause' can also refer to the causa finalis, as in 'fighting for a just cause'.

  • @yer1552
    @yer1552 8 днів тому

    thanks man

  • @life42theuniverse
    @life42theuniverse 3 роки тому +2

    The difference between a natural and an artificial object, an artificial object is an emergent property of function, while the natural object is the physical thing itself. A bed is both an artificial object with the property of something upon which you rest as well as being made of a physical material of some kind.

    • @bryanfisk7904
      @bryanfisk7904 2 місяці тому

      I think the point about unnatural objects is that they do not exist indepenently, they depend on other attributes for their existence for example a wooden bed is made of wood and in fact a bed cannot exist without these other attibutes (wood, metal, etc). I believe that wood is also unnatural as it is not indepenent of soil which is needed for wood to exist and soil is unnatural because it needs earth and water (which are two of the 4 only natural 'objects')

  • @annakepanna
    @annakepanna 6 місяців тому

    The prof is so nice to his students... during my time at uni in the 2000's (University of Cape Town) , the lecturers were very mean and condescending. Different times, or different culture?

  • @christopherbechard5660
    @christopherbechard5660 3 роки тому

    Can you tell me which book of Aristotle's Physics you discuss in this lecture? Great videos!

  • @austinjoseph8849
    @austinjoseph8849 2 роки тому

    There is a radiator detecting sound.

  • @KatBuckleyXOX
    @KatBuckleyXOX 4 роки тому

    XOX

  • @NileValleyDreams
    @NileValleyDreams Рік тому

    Which textbook are the students using?

    • @jacksanders2611
      @jacksanders2611  Рік тому +2

      Most (but not all) of the readings come from Classics of Western Philosophy, by Steven M. Cahn...

    • @NileValleyDreams
      @NileValleyDreams Рік тому

      @@jacksanders2611 Thank you so much; greatly appreciated. I truly enjoy your lectures.

  • @a.k.3531
    @a.k.3531 4 роки тому +1

    I understand that woodiness in bed is natural. But bed in itself is unnatural? The Bed constitutes nature thing and how it is not natural? Comes out, idea of bed is unnatural which is too silly.

    • @jacksanders2611
      @jacksanders2611  3 роки тому

      Hi A.K. - Aristotle isn't so much talking about the Platonic idea of "bed", but (instead) the particular bed. It was made by someone, so is (to that extent) not natural... Cheers, Jack

  • @strings-n-keys
    @strings-n-keys 4 роки тому +2

    It`s very easy to be an atheist in a way, especially when you are a successful person. Failure, misfortune, personal tragedy, bad health and such are huge blessings in disguise.

    • @freethink2303
      @freethink2303 4 роки тому +3

      Why do none of your comments pertain to the video that they are posted on?

    • @Nexus-jg7ev
      @Nexus-jg7ev 10 місяців тому

      Logically, the bad things that you listed should make it even easier for someone to be an atheist.

  • @eliasrayz1412
    @eliasrayz1412 3 роки тому +1

    your intro is too long, my guy.

    • @jacksanders2611
      @jacksanders2611  3 роки тому +2

      For some purposes, perhaps; but it's pretty easy to skip past it...