Actually, I live there closer to Dubai, is really hot there in Dubai, so in November, weather will be fine, also from November to March for all people visit to Dubai cuz is a _Perfect_ weather to stay in Dubai can’t wait for summer ends cuz temperature start to cooling
Most hilarious deflection video ever! Deflecting anyone from thinking on their own! The penguins won't like it! It's just better to stay away from the poles! Great entertainment!
The reason the planes dont fly directly over the poles has nothing to do with CAN'T!!! They dont want the people to see what's at the poles. Dont believe me? Look at the poles on Google earth. They are covered 100% of the time, Not by accident.
So two things. 1. You are telling me that planes solely rely on magnetic poles in an old school compass and not computer guided systems and gps? 2. You are telling me that at 33,000 feet there are complete white out snow storms? I'm having a hard time with either of these.
IKR, it’s not like oh Disney world has a no fly zone cause they don’t want a plane landing there. It’s because of 9/11. How do they not know historical facts? It’s basically History 101, Large place and has big buildings and is recognizable worldwide.
Well, after seeing this i'm gonna establish a no fly zone over my new blender, I just bought it & the last thing i want is for a plane to crash into it. This is also for the safety of my cat
Runways are numbered according to how close they are aligned to magnetic North, not true North. Also, magnetic North is not located at the North pole, which invalidates your answer as to why they won't fly over the North pole. On routes between Canada and Northern Europe, they do fly very close to the poles. Commercial airliners are not 100% dependent on an accurate magnetic compass. Their primary compass is gyroscopic. The magnetic compass only serves as a backup should the gyroscopic compass fail, GPS fail and whatever ATC radar is available for vectors fails. They use chart software built into the Flight Management Computer (FMC) to determine what their course over ground needs to be which translates to the heading they need to follow to stay over their trackline. Whoever provided your information is wrong. Maybe check your information with a professional pilot next time? It is quite a disservice to provide inaccurate information to the public.
@@E3ECO Redundancy is key in aviation. There was a time when ariplanes with 2 engines could not fly between US and Europe. Specifically because people thought they would have no redundancy. Also, the airspace is not 'free for all'. While Gyro and GPS work as back-up to one another, ATC vectoring exists to also facilitate safety margins between different aircraft in the sky. @David Morgan FCM generally plots waypoints and the track is referenced to those waypoints, not the whole route itself.
Planes do fly over the Pacific Ocean when they are heading to Hawaii, when they fly to Asia from the West Coast they head North over Alaska and head West. They fly this route to avoid the headwinds which would cause them to burn more fuel fighting the headwinds blowing from West to East.
Santiago - Sydney is an Antartica route, performed by a 4 Engine Aircraft under a maintenance program for high reliability, Performed only during the south hemisphere summer, not for weather reasons, but for comercial reasons. Inertial and GPS signals are now the primary source of navigation, per law, a regular compass is installed on every aircraft, a special permit is given for such routes that magnetism navigation is not practical. Aircraft don’t flight over the Everest because there is no airway over it, and who doesn’t like a photo of the highest mountain. Many twin engines aircraft can’t flight routes if they don’t have an airport with in 60 minutes in-route, but if is maintain under ETOPs maintenance program, the could fly up to 120 minutes of flight to the nearest airport in-route.
"Strong magnatic field in Mecca". I have looked all over the internet for research to verify this information and I found zero. Kindly site your references used to make this video
Vincent Goudreault I read that it is in a NEW Scientist article years ago. Can’t see why they’d make it up so I think you’re wrong there mate. I’m not a Muslim either so have no bias either way.
Actually there are a few passenger flights from Melbourne to Antarctica each year. They are sightseeing trips. They dont land in Antarctica just fly over it low to give great views of the ice. Because they don't land the Antarctic flights are actually classed as Australian domestic charter flights using Qantas aircraft. Either a 747 or A380 typically. Tickets for them are sold by Croydon Travel in Melbourne Australia. They have flights on new years eve and Valentine's day each year.
Air New Zealand used to fly over Antarctica carrying sightseers between 1977 and 1979, then flight 901 crashed there on the 28th November 1979, and the flights were cancelled forever. They never used that flight number ever again
@@umont13 alot of misinformation, first video I've watched from these guys, and I don't see how they've gotten so many subs legitimately, feels like they are the sort of people who would say "don't take dihydrogen monoxide because it's posionous" despite dihydrogen (H2) monoxide (O) being water (H20)
Umont12 for example, airplanes do fly over over the South Pole just not normally. It is VERY common for planes to fly over the North Pole. The reason that planes normally don’t fly over the South Pole is a certification called ETOPS (Engines Turn Or People Swim) basically if they loose an engine, how long can the plane stay aloft on one engine. If the time that it can be aloft isn’t long enough to make it to a airport, then that is out of the certification zone.
for the Area 51 one, only their security helicopters (they have helicopters that covers the ground that the ground security can't reach) and the fighters jets they have out there are allowed to fly for testing purposes only. The only civilian aircraft that can fly over to Area 51 is the JANET lines coming in from Las Vegas, which is basically Area 51 workers from Vegas.
Umm...... If planes don't fly over the Pacific Ocean then what is the route that is taken when flying from YVR to SYD?? From posted flight paths it looks like all flights fly over the Pacific Ocean.
Sorry @@cornbisque . Qantas do a tourist trip over the joint,. ""Approximately three hours south of Australia, passengers will usually see the first scattered ice followed by dozens of icebergs and ice floes. We then cross the South Magnetic Pole where you will start to view the rugged mountainous topography of the Antarctic mainland.""
1:on October 5, 2021, a Qantas 787 flew over Antarctica. 2:why don’t we use ILS approach thing? also, there are no no-fly zone around Disney. in ww2, China had some flights with the dc3 around Mount Everest
1:00 there’s a thing called IFR- Instrument Flight Rules. Basically, you fly mainly using instruments, so you can fly in low visibility conditions. Also, if you are at cruising altitude, there’s a very high chance you’ll fly over the windy/snowy conditions. Also for 3:55 there are some A340s fitted with oxygen tanks so if there is a decompression, the air supply would last longer that the average 15 mins. (sorry for the rant)
I have flown between the US and Japan and Guam MANY times, never once did I fly over Europe or the middle east to get there. Also, I lived in Kuwait for 11 years, the average summer temp runs around 120 F, sometimes even hotter, I am in the aviation industry and have been for 30 years, I have never seen planes grounded for it being too hot.
I flew to NZ from Seattle, and Sydney to Honolulu, flying over the Pacific, dude. On the other hand it was so hot in Phoenix one time we just rolled to LA.
@@TonyP9279 All the Asian flights from the west coast do, only the east coast ones fly over Europe and central or southern Asia. For example, Singapore Airlines flights from LAX/SFO/SEA direct to SIN and SIN via HKG/Tokyo fly over the Pacific, while SQ flights from Newark fly over Europe and South Asia. Of course US/Canadian flights to Australia and NZ also fly over the Pacific. Dallas/Houston flights fly over Mexico and then enter the Pacific Ocean for the long haul down under. Vancouver, SFO and LAX flights fly across the Pacific Ocean to Australia and ditto for Honolulu-Aus/NZ flights. Soon there will be a Chicago-Brisbane service which will also fly over the Pacific Ocean.
I'm pretty sure that have been scenic flights over Antarctica from New Zealand since 2013. Prior to that there were scenic flights from 1977-1979; It ran for such a short time because of the Mt. Erebus Disaster (Air New Zealand Flight 901).
The reason why planes don't really fly above Antarctica is because of the ETOPS rating for most planes are too low for it to make a landing as it's going above the Antarctic. Nearest airport from there would be somewhere down in New Zealand or Australia which is around 8-10hrs away from the center of the Antarctic. Planes that flew above it were 4 engined planes. Pan Am flight 50 is a good example, they used a 747SP to go through there.
Já existem muitos vôos ETOPS de "apenas" dois motores. Já há motores com níveis de fiabilidade tão grande que não é necessário quatro. A principal razão será porque não é o caminho mais curto em nenhum vôo.
Same, I flew from San Diego, CA to Cebu over the Pacific as well landed in Hawaii and continued the trip in the same direction and came back the same way lol.
Anytime to fly to Asia out of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland or Seattle, you're going to fly across the Pacific Ocean. The only ones that fly across Europe to get to places like Singapore are any flights that have stops in places like Abu Dhabi or Qatar. Everyone else flies across the Pacific with stops in Honolulu, Japan, a few places in China, Taiwan, Guam, etc.
Nah, get the heck outta here, hater. Edit: Dude, I’m telling you, the reply’ers’ ,that doesn’t like your opinion, are pretty much more patient and possibly smarter than you. :/ I dunno about myself though
Aashi JHANJI no, it has to do with the direction of jet streams. Why fly against the wind when you can use it as boost. Which means saving money for airlines.
I’ve flown multiple times to Asia and never has the route been from West to East. We’ve always gone over the Pacific Ocean, often sticking to the coasts for as long as possible (In case of emergency landings.)
Is there really a practical need for commercial airliners to fly over Antarctica, and who wants to risk flying over an extensive zone that is often the coldest on Earth?
There are many other no flying zones around the world. In Brasilia, Brazil flying over the region called "Pilot Plan" (Plano Piloto), where the federal administration buildings and embassies are located, it´s a no fly zone. Ten years ago, a private pilot wanted to check what would happen if he flies over the Planalto Palace (where the president works) and he was followed by Brazilian air force planes that forced him to land and he got arrested and sued for violating federal air space.
That would make sense 60 years ago but Gyros are not affected by the magnetic poles. Modern aircraft have three and the fly between them. Maybe i'm misinformed.
Bright side: says no planes fly over the Pacific Ocean because it’s faster to go through Europe and Western Asia to reach Eastern Asia 3 weeks later Brightside: Planes fly over Alaska to get to Eastern Asia Planes from Australia: am I a joke to you
Well, East Asia is a big place, you know? And so is US. If you wanted to fly from New York or that Canadian city on the East Coast whose name I cannot remember to North-East Asia, like Seoul, a route over the Arctic might prove a bit more efficient.
Yeah my parents flew that route last week. They go further south generally for better winds when going westwards. There was also a big storm. They got 400km from Antarctica.
my god i loathe this video, and pretty much all other videos this guy has made. im convinced this is a misinformation campaign to detest future pilots.
There used to be till a few years ago a bi weekly transpolar flight over the south pole between Auckland, New Zealand and Buenos Aires, Argentina, and planes don't use magnetic compasses, they use gyroscopic or laser compasses and GPS so the magnetic poles don't affect the navigation.
I've been on flights that have taken me over the north pole Bright Side multiple times. (JFK-ICN or Seoul Incheon) Aircrafts have a setting in instruments that change the compass from Magnetic North to True North when they fly over 70 degrees North, so that they aren't subject to magnetic variation. Below 70 Degrees, they fly using magnetic heading. Above 70 degrees it is switched to use the GPS signals to see what direction the aircraft is pointed in. Two, airport runways are marked based on Magnetic Heading, not True Heading. Also, there are a couple of airports that I can name to you off the bat that have 4 runways in the same direction, but the runway numbers are different. This includes one very busy airport with the code LAX. I'll let you figure out what airport I am talking about so you can look it up. You have zero idea what you are talking about. You didn't do your research prior to publishing this, and it shows. Oh, and incidentally, for more flights that take you over the North Pole, there is Newark-Singapore, Newark to Hong Kong, NYC to just about anywhere in China. I could go on. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU PUBLISH SOMETHING.
I would call this video's title clickbait because it is more about places planes don't fly over than "why planes don't fly over Antarctica" specifically. But the label 'clickbait' implies that I was somehow disappointed with the video I watched after seeing the title, and in this case the video sufficiently covered the topic in the title before then discussing many more interesting related phenomena. In other words, the video itself was much better than its title suggested. I guess it's a sort of... anti-clickbait? Whatever it is, cheers, Bright Side, for far exceeding my expectations!
You seem to have not listened. They can fly over it but choose not to as, apart from Hawaii, it would be a major detour that could be avoid simply by flying over the Atlantic.
1) I fond out from a pilot friend hat the issue of continual compass adjustment in the Canadian Arctic has much been resolved by using satellite services as an alternative to the compass. Nonetheless communications in the arctic are notable more difficult than further south.
Ummmm....when we went to Australia, we flew from SFO to Sydney, direct. Pretty sure that was the Pacific ocean below us. Heck, we even came back the same way.
Now I know that runways are numbered by how many degrees off true north they are. I have wondered why they were numbered the way they are. I’m actually speechless. So good to come across a video where one actually learns something new.
@@captigaular YES it is... if you go there you will feel a different type of peace and tranquility maybe you haven't experienced before. Trust me I'v been there. AMAZING.
Mostly rubbish Airplanes co not navigating on a magnetic compass The magnetic poles are far from the geographic poles The main reason is that there are no alternate airports in the area
Every international flight I have taken from California to Asia and back has flown via the Pacific ocean. Sure they the routes were further north but they were traversing the Pacific.
I have flown direct from Sydney Australia to California. Years ago we would stop in Hawaii then continue to America. All I ever saw was water below. If it wasn't the Pacific ocean I don't know what else it could be.
Planes actually does fly over tibet, the Chengdu airlines, and the Yunnan airlines are two airlines that have flight routes that flies over tibet. Normally on a plane that flies over the tibet, 2 pilots and 1 co-pilot will be flying the plane.
Mountain climbers that want to climb the Himalayas will fly to Kathmandu (If I spelt it correctly) Airport, also known as one of the most dangerous airports in the world; there would be parts of the Himalayas terrain in its approach path.
@@nacoran Planes fly over the Arctic in just a few flights like: Los Angeles-Dubai, Los Angeles-Doha, Newark-Singapore (and not always) New York-Hong Kong, and a few more
@@nacoran They most certainly DID say planes don't fly over the Pacific. Then they turned around and said "it isn't true per se, because there is a shorter route." But this is STILL WRONG. EVERY flight from the mainland US to Hawaii, and EVERY flight from much of the western US to Asia, Oceania, the Phillipines, New Zealand, etc. fly over the Pacific. This video is GROSSLY misleading on that point.
Hey there, Brightsiders! Which of these places would youlove to visit?
I would like to visit your google/youtube account so I can delete it permanently, thank you.
@@ROOTZDNB Thank you my friend
Area 51
Malacañan Palace in the Philippines is also a no fly zone..
Actually, I live there closer to Dubai, is really hot there in Dubai, so in November, weather will be fine, also from November to March for all people visit to Dubai cuz is a _Perfect_ weather to stay in Dubai
can’t wait for summer ends cuz temperature start to cooling
This should have been titled "Why Planes Wont Fly Over Certain Places" instead of "Why Planes Don't Fly Over Antarctica"
What
No one cares. Why don’t u make a video named “Why planes don’t fly over certain places” if you’re so smart
Tell em my friend
This is supposed to be a way to lure people into watching the video. Don’t worry you’ll get used to it.
Antarctica will capture peeps more
Most hilarious deflection video ever! Deflecting anyone from thinking on their own! The penguins won't like it! It's just better to stay away from the poles! Great entertainment!
So at 33,000 feet you would get a whiteout? I call BS.
Yeah total bs
The reason the planes dont fly directly over the poles has nothing to do with CAN'T!!! They dont want the people to see what's at the poles. Dont believe me? Look at the poles on Google earth. They are covered 100% of the time, Not by accident.
Dark Thoughts magnetic compasses are one of the mandatory instruments required for flight.
Mate I think your right I ain't no flat earther but something smells rotten in d state of Denmark
Too windy 😂
So two things.
1. You are telling me that planes solely rely on magnetic poles in an old school compass and not computer guided systems and gps?
2. You are telling me that at 33,000 feet there are complete white out snow storms?
I'm having a hard time with either of these.
The real reason is the same reason they censored the North Pole from google earth and don’t let people visit Antarctica
yeah this vid is complete bs 💩
Title: "Why planes don't fly over Antarctica"
Air New Zealand flight 901: "Am i a joke to you?"
Lol😂
That is right. This DC10 crashed there. The same year Flight 191 DC10 crashed in Chicago.
Hold up, does ANZ 901 actually fly over Antarctica?
@@Cpr1234 yeah, cuz the crash location of ANZ 901 is in Antartica
@@Cpr1234 No, They use to fly into Mc Murdo Sound and then onto Mt Erabus , And then return, No plane has ever flown over Antartica,
I am a pilot and I don't approve this video. Man, so many wrong facts..
Such as?...........
???
IKR, it’s not like oh Disney world has a no fly zone cause they don’t want a plane landing there. It’s because of 9/11. How do they not know historical facts? It’s basically History 101, Large place and has big buildings and is recognizable worldwide.
I subscribed you Sir
Exactly
Planes do fly over pacific ocean from LAX and SFO to Asia like Japan, Korea and Hong Kong. And to Hawaii
And they do fly very close to North Pole from New York to Hong Kong
They lied
It’s false, planes fly over the pacific all the time
I agree..this video is a lie..
Obviously they haven't done enough research.
Well, after seeing this i'm gonna establish a no fly zone over my new blender, I just bought it & the last thing i want is for a plane to crash into it. This is also for the safety of my cat
Not if I establish a no blender zone under my flight route.
@@haraka8123 lol
Wehner we go inside a blender in a airplane we just get mixed up outside the airplane & we die!
Runways are numbered according to how close they are aligned to magnetic North, not true North. Also, magnetic North is not located at the North pole, which invalidates your answer as to why they won't fly over the North pole. On routes between Canada and Northern Europe, they do fly very close to the poles. Commercial airliners are not 100% dependent on an accurate magnetic compass. Their primary compass is gyroscopic. The magnetic compass only serves as a backup should the gyroscopic compass fail, GPS fail and whatever ATC radar is available for vectors fails. They use chart software built into the Flight Management Computer (FMC) to determine what their course over ground needs to be which translates to the heading they need to follow to stay over their trackline. Whoever provided your information is wrong. Maybe check your information with a professional pilot next time? It is quite a disservice to provide inaccurate information to the public.
I thought they primarily used GPS these days.
@@E3ECO Redundancy is key in aviation. There was a time when ariplanes with 2 engines could not fly between US and Europe. Specifically because people thought they would have no redundancy. Also, the airspace is not 'free for all'. While Gyro and GPS work as back-up to one another, ATC vectoring exists to also facilitate safety margins between different aircraft in the sky.
@David Morgan FCM generally plots waypoints and the track is referenced to those waypoints, not the whole route itself.
Hmm, answer seems to be invalidated?
I would like your view on the reason given for not flying over Antarctica , considering commercial aircraft cruise at over 30,000 ft ?
goose72 Goose72 What's the reason to fly over Antarctica? There are no airports for emergency landing. And no radio connection.
Planes do fly over the Pacific Ocean when they are heading to Hawaii, when they fly to Asia from the West Coast they head North over Alaska and head West. They fly this route to avoid the headwinds which would cause them to burn more fuel fighting the headwinds blowing from West to East.
It should be called BS side, instead of Bright side.
Yes, there are a lot of lies in this. Garbage. Planes fly over the north pole all the time. Mecca does not have any magnetic force.
Bs is brawl stars
@@zincfive derp.. Antarctica is at the bottom of the earth......
Oh and it's "The Rain in Spain FALLS mainly on the plane".. Muppets!!!
Well Bright Side in short form is BS.
Santiago - Sydney is an Antartica route, performed by a 4 Engine Aircraft under a maintenance program for high reliability, Performed only during the south hemisphere summer, not for weather reasons, but for comercial reasons. Inertial and GPS signals are now the primary source of navigation, per law, a regular compass is installed on every aircraft, a special permit is given for such routes that magnetism navigation is not practical. Aircraft don’t flight over the Everest because there is no airway over it, and who doesn’t like a photo of the highest mountain. Many twin engines aircraft can’t flight routes if they don’t have an airport with in 60 minutes in-route, but if is maintain under ETOPs maintenance program, the could fly up to 120 minutes of flight to the nearest airport in-route.
"Strong magnatic field in Mecca". I have looked all over the internet for research to verify this information and I found zero. Kindly site your references used to make this video
There is no reference because that is a BS claim. There is nothing magnetically special about Mecca.
It's totally false. Just respecting a religious tradition.
Vincent Goudreault I read that it is in a NEW Scientist article years ago. Can’t see why they’d make it up so I think you’re wrong there mate. I’m not a Muslim either so have no bias either way.
@@joejitsu034 a research would be more credible... If you can provide the research you've read that would be most appreciated
There's a giant Gamecube(the black one not the purple) that uses a magnet & laser to read the giant mini disc that stores the games.
There is so much wrong with this video, I'm just gonna stop watching
Same. Only click-bait nonsense here.
In addition to the incessant artificial camera shake
Saaaaame
Same...I didn't finish it
I lost 3.3 million brain cells
Actually there are a few passenger flights from Melbourne to Antarctica each year. They are sightseeing trips. They dont land in Antarctica just fly over it low to give great views of the ice. Because they don't land the Antarctic flights are actually classed as Australian domestic charter flights using Qantas aircraft. Either a 747 or A380 typically. Tickets for them are sold by Croydon Travel in Melbourne Australia.
They have flights on new years eve and Valentine's day each year.
@Shelly Nogueira wron they fly over it
This was like, "babies first; dont worry about Antarctica just go away"
i lost alot of braincells reading this.
Air New Zealand used to fly over Antarctica carrying sightseers between 1977 and 1979, then flight 901 crashed there on the 28th November 1979, and the flights were cancelled forever. They never used that flight number ever again
First when i saw the text,I taught it said: why planes dont fly over america.
I just..... °0°??? But now i know that i was wrong.....
Why planes like to fly into buildings in America
They don’t try to. Like the twin tower incident; they crashed. It wasn’t the pilot’s fault either.
I’m just saying it wasn’t the pilot’s fault. The crash wasn’t really an accident.
My birthday has history
Skinny Jeans he says it’s not the pilots fault he never said it’s an accident. The pilot got attacked so it isn’t his mistake.
Area 51 Is right next to Groom Lake search it up on Google Earth
We know
haha lol
It is hidden among bombing ranges, a good reason to stay out.
That’s where the naruto runners will be running in
🙄
Airplanes aren’t allowed to fly over Lionel Messi’s house either
Right
Why
( I think it' s clickbait )
true
Why do you alwas goke 🏁.
Plane does fly over north pole
Plane does fly over Tibet
Plane does fly over Pacific Ocean
But if they say so, some lies will come up
cant fly over antarctica as its impossible to do so
bruh
As if you could fly over Antarctica in the first place, you’d fly through it rather.
The North Pole is the Arctic. You have lost all credibility. Your comment is moot.
I Was Really Expecting More Facts On Antartica
It is still a good video
in your dreams
☹️
I was expecting 'any' facts on Antarctica.
Antarctica is a forbiden place, couse they are lying about Earth. UA-cam Eric Dubay to find out more.
This video is so incorrect it should be taken down.
James Hanley why Is it incorrect?
@@umont13 alot of misinformation, first video I've watched from these guys, and I don't see how they've gotten so many subs legitimately, feels like they are the sort of people who would say "don't take dihydrogen monoxide because it's posionous" despite dihydrogen (H2) monoxide (O) being water (H20)
Umont12 for example, airplanes do fly over over the South Pole just not normally. It is VERY common for planes to fly over the North Pole. The reason that planes normally don’t fly over the South Pole is a certification called ETOPS (Engines Turn Or People Swim) basically if they loose an engine, how long can the plane stay aloft on one engine. If the time that it can be aloft isn’t long enough to make it to a airport, then that is out of the certification zone.
Thank you. These people are trying to lie to people
@@jameshanley7052 in this video that was mentioned but only in other words :)
for the Area 51 one, only their security helicopters (they have helicopters that covers the ground that the ground security can't reach) and the fighters jets they have out there are allowed to fly for testing purposes only. The only civilian aircraft that can fly over to Area 51 is the JANET lines coming in from Las Vegas, which is basically Area 51 workers from Vegas.
If planes can't go over the Pacific Ocean then how are they going to get to Hawaii??
Completely over, man!
Didn't listen too carefully did you?
The plane flies underground oviuslly
Good point
Umm......
If planes don't fly over the Pacific Ocean then what is the route that is taken when flying from YVR to SYD??
From posted flight paths it looks like all flights fly over the Pacific Ocean.
As a freighter pilot I flew over the Himalayas. It was like you could almost touch them
You can fly to Antarctica from Australia every summer and you cross the Pacific on a long haul flight from Sydney to Los Angeles
I prefer boat, because we NEVER fly on planes dispite my step dad being a PILOT!!!😠😠😠 AND ALL OUR VACATIONS GET CANCLED DIFFERENT REASON EVERY YEAR!
IKR but some people be special and not use their head and proper research
Wayne Stobbe last comment was for you
Wayne Stobbe that’s impossible. The only flights that get close to Antarctica Are Sydney/ Auckland to Santiago/ Buenos Aires.
Sorry @@cornbisque . Qantas do a tourist trip over the joint,. ""Approximately three hours south of Australia, passengers will usually see the first scattered ice followed by dozens of icebergs and ice floes. We then cross the South Magnetic Pole where you will start to view the rugged mountainous topography of the Antarctic mainland.""
1:on October 5, 2021, a Qantas 787 flew over Antarctica. 2:why don’t we use ILS approach thing? also, there are no no-fly zone around Disney. in ww2, China had some flights with the dc3 around Mount Everest
1:00 there’s a thing called IFR- Instrument Flight Rules. Basically, you fly mainly using instruments, so you can fly in low visibility conditions. Also, if you are at cruising altitude, there’s a very high chance you’ll fly over the windy/snowy conditions.
Also for 3:55 there are some A340s fitted with oxygen tanks so if there is a decompression, the air supply would last longer that the average 15 mins.
(sorry for the rant)
No a340s have that every plane is the same
I have flown between the US and Japan and Guam MANY times, never once did I fly over Europe or the middle east to get there. Also, I lived in Kuwait for 11 years, the average summer temp runs around 120 F, sometimes even hotter, I am in the aviation industry and have been for 30 years, I have never seen planes grounded for it being too hot.
Exactly been Alaska then down to Japan or Honolulu then Japan.
They grounded planes in Arizona because the asphalt temperatures 140f or 60c the highest the asphalt can get is 180f or 82.2c
I flew to NZ from Seattle, and Sydney to Honolulu, flying over the Pacific, dude. On the other hand it was so hot in Phoenix one time we just rolled to LA.
An aeroplane crashed into Mt Erebus in Antarctica.
Air New Zealand.
Flight 901, it should have been mentioned
Still the 19th worst crash of all time
And it was the 4th worst at that point
Can't fly over Pacific Ocean, then how do you fly from Los Angeles International Airport to Hawaii?
Seriously?
Every Asian flight I can think of flies over North Pacific/Artic Circle routes from N. America.
@@TonyP9279 Yep. Every morning when it's clear, you can see a busy lane up above if you live on the west coast.
@@TonyP9279 All the Asian flights from the west coast do, only the east coast ones fly over Europe and central or southern Asia. For example, Singapore Airlines flights from LAX/SFO/SEA direct to SIN and SIN via HKG/Tokyo fly over the Pacific, while SQ flights from Newark fly over Europe and South Asia. Of course US/Canadian flights to Australia and NZ also fly over the Pacific. Dallas/Houston flights fly over Mexico and then enter the Pacific Ocean for the long haul down under. Vancouver, SFO and LAX flights fly across the Pacific Ocean to Australia and ditto for Honolulu-Aus/NZ flights. Soon there will be a Chicago-Brisbane service which will also fly over the Pacific Ocean.
@@RW4X4X3006 Most Australian and Asian flights depart LAX and SFO late at night and arrive into these cities in the early morning.
There ARE flights that fly over the Pacific Ocean.
Seriously, your lack of research has hampered the credibility of your channel.
Hawaii for one.
Auckland to Los Angeles Sydney to Dallas ever heard of ETOPS?
they did not say cant or wont, they said usually wont.
Karan Vij they want money they don't care about anything else
Cathay Pacific...The west coast to Hong Kong.
i found myself questioning way too much info in this video...u can do better
It's fake.
Same here and I couldn't even find a few points to verify there authenticity.
I'm pretty sure that have been scenic flights over Antarctica from New Zealand since 2013.
Prior to that there were scenic flights from 1977-1979; It ran for such a short time because of the Mt. Erebus Disaster (Air New Zealand Flight 901).
BS. Modern jetliners
do not navigate using a magnetic compass.
Liar, I just rode the clouds over the Pacific Ocean last night, duhh. I have flown over that puddle over 20 times so far
The reason why planes don't really fly above Antarctica is because of the ETOPS rating for most planes are too low for it to make a landing as it's going above the Antarctic. Nearest airport from there would be somewhere down in New Zealand or Australia which is around 8-10hrs away from the center of the Antarctic. Planes that flew above it were 4 engined planes. Pan Am flight 50 is a good example, they used a 747SP to go through there.
Já existem muitos vôos ETOPS de "apenas" dois motores. Já há motores com níveis de fiabilidade tão grande que não é necessário quatro. A principal razão será porque não é o caminho mais curto em nenhum vôo.
Need to look over this again Brightside, most facts on this video are wrong.
I think the word 'all' is more relevant here.
@@paulanderson79 I wouldn’t say all, but many are incorrect
Then why are you referring to them as "facts"
YOu shouldn't be surprised... It's Brightspace
BS. I flew from BC Canada to Philippines over Pacific Ocean.
Same, I flew from San Diego, CA to Cebu over the Pacific as well landed in Hawaii and continued the trip in the same direction and came back the same way lol.
Same we go to plane I dont know where we go but I know that we flew over the Pacific ocean
He clickbaits that's why
Anytime to fly to Asia out of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland or Seattle, you're going to fly across the Pacific Ocean. The only ones that fly across Europe to get to places like Singapore are any flights that have stops in places like Abu Dhabi or Qatar. Everyone else flies across the Pacific with stops in Honolulu, Japan, a few places in China, Taiwan, Guam, etc.
This is so full of complete NONSENSE that it should be removed.
Exactly
Dave Bosworth ahemmmm, nah IF YOU HATE IT THEN GET THE *FXCKING* COMMENT SECTION!
Get the heck out of here hater
Hahahalol
Nah, get the heck outta here, hater.
Edit: Dude, I’m telling you, the reply’ers’ ,that doesn’t like your opinion, are pretty much more patient and possibly smarter than you. :/ I dunno about myself though
Planes can't cross Antarctica because of Earth's solid invisible firmament. Duuuuhhh
basically looking at all the circles of 'no fly zones' you can't fly over the USA
Planes do fly over Pacific Ocean Just not a straight line
Aashi JHANJI no, it has to do with the direction of jet streams. Why fly against the wind when you can use it as boost. Which means saving money for airlines.
No plane flies in a straight line
Mark Griffith ikr!? I live in Japan. Each flight always flies over the Pacific Ocean. I’m confused.
At 6:42 the pin for Texas was in North Dakota area
Bright side is Stoopid
No it’s because after they fly over Antarctica they reach the North Pole and they don’t want Santa to be mad and put them in the bad list.
Bright side: do you know any interesting facts about what planes can't or won't do?
Me: planes can't fly to space
Runways are marked by compass degrees useing the magnetic compass, not by the diffrence in true north
I’ve flown multiple times to Asia and never has the route been from West to East. We’ve always gone over the Pacific Ocean, often sticking to the coasts for as long as possible (In case of emergency landings.)
2:56
Bright side “Due to the earths spherical shape”
Flat earthers:”IM TRIGGGGGREEEEEED REEEEEEEEEEE
Is there really a practical need for commercial airliners to fly over Antarctica, and who wants to risk flying over an extensive zone that is often the coldest on Earth?
"Why don't planes fly over Australia?"
*Because then it would be upside down*
?
Australia isn't even real
Australia actually makes upside down planes so they can fly around there
So the United States and the rest of the world is on its side?
@@daybot9592 indeed
What a bunch of BS
about flying over Antarctica
Galaxial Pharmaceutical hah lier. Because the plant floats on water for a good period of time bc the wings act as a pontoon.
There is no South Pole on a flat earth.
@@Xinthose Good thing we don't live on one of those then.
think about the penguins
Yeah, think about the penguins
There are many other no flying zones around the world. In Brasilia, Brazil flying over the region called "Pilot Plan" (Plano Piloto), where the federal administration buildings and embassies are located, it´s a no fly zone. Ten years ago, a private pilot wanted to check what would happen if he flies over the Planalto Palace (where the president works) and he was followed by Brazilian air force planes that forced him to land and he got arrested and sued for violating federal air space.
That would make sense 60 years ago but Gyros are not affected by the magnetic poles. Modern aircraft have three and the fly between them. Maybe i'm misinformed.
Pilot:
ICEBERG RIGHT AHEAD, HARD TO STARBOARD!
Co-Pilot: bruh
😂😂😂
Runways are numbered based on its Magnetic Heading...not how far from True North they are...just saying
yea lol ikr
planes don't fly over MY mama's house. she has really good hearing and is that good at complaining. bless her heart........
just cuz there isn't an airport doesn't mean they won't fly OVER it
Bright side: says no planes fly over the Pacific Ocean because it’s faster to go through Europe and Western Asia to reach Eastern Asia
3 weeks later Brightside: Planes fly over Alaska to get to Eastern Asia
Planes from Australia: am I a joke to you
Well, East Asia is a big place, you know? And so is US. If you wanted to fly from New York or that Canadian city on the East Coast whose name I cannot remember to North-East Asia, like Seoul, a route over the Arctic might prove a bit more efficient.
...because the Earth is flat and we live in a "Globe".
Thank you boy genius. I was strolling through the comments to see who brave enough to say it before I do.
cowboy7995 the fact this has 21 likes makes me lose faith in humanity
bruh everyone knows the earth is round bc how do boats sail on the ocean without falling off the edge? THE EARTH IS ROUND THAT'S WHY!
Search "Operation Fishbowl" and Admiral Byrd for a few hrs... and then come back here.
Based and red pilled
PLANES DON'T FLY OVER ANTARCTICA BECAUSE THERE IS NO ROUTES THAT GO THAT WAY DIRECTLY.
Patrick Ireland Wrong! Sydney-Johannesberg route does. Qantas sends 747’s.
and navigation i guess
There are no routes because it’s dangerous
@@jnf_media_ If you run a great circle mapper; that route doesn't go far enough south to reach Antarctica.
Yeah my parents flew that route last week. They go further south generally for better winds when going westwards.
There was also a big storm. They got 400km from Antarctica.
Planes DO fly over antartica, just like they do the north pole. they fly over it when going from south america to southern africa.
Today, modern aircraft use GPS to navigate, they no longer rely on compasses.
When you said the word “don’t fly over the Pacific Ocean”, how will you get to Hawaii?
my god i loathe this video, and pretty much all other videos this guy has made. im convinced this is a misinformation campaign to detest future pilots.
Report them.
There used to be till a few years ago a bi weekly transpolar flight over the south pole between Auckland, New Zealand and Buenos Aires, Argentina, and planes don't use magnetic compasses, they use gyroscopic or laser compasses and GPS so the magnetic poles don't affect the navigation.
Only the compass
I've been on flights that have taken me over the north pole Bright Side multiple times. (JFK-ICN or Seoul Incheon) Aircrafts have a setting in instruments that change the compass from Magnetic North to True North when they fly over 70 degrees North, so that they aren't subject to magnetic variation. Below 70 Degrees, they fly using magnetic heading. Above 70 degrees it is switched to use the GPS signals to see what direction the aircraft is pointed in. Two, airport runways are marked based on Magnetic Heading, not True Heading. Also, there are a couple of airports that I can name to you off the bat that have 4 runways in the same direction, but the runway numbers are different. This includes one very busy airport with the code LAX. I'll let you figure out what airport I am talking about so you can look it up. You have zero idea what you are talking about. You didn't do your research prior to publishing this, and it shows. Oh, and incidentally, for more flights that take you over the North Pole, there is Newark-Singapore, Newark to Hong Kong, NYC to just about anywhere in China. I could go on. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU PUBLISH SOMETHING.
me at 3am: I think it's time to sleep
UA-cam: hey, do you want to know why planes dont fly over antarctica?
ge lo same just its 2:47 am
It's a bit scary that 16k people upvoted this when it's so inaccurate. I hope they do a little research on their own.
That's what internet does for ppl. Sad
I would call this video's title clickbait because it is more about places planes don't fly over than "why planes don't fly over Antarctica" specifically. But the label 'clickbait' implies that I was somehow disappointed with the video I watched after seeing the title, and in this case the video sufficiently covered the topic in the title before then discussing many more interesting related phenomena. In other words, the video itself was much better than its title suggested. I guess it's a sort of... anti-clickbait? Whatever it is, cheers, Bright Side, for far exceeding my expectations!
I love how put a red no no sign over crossing the pacific ocean. cough flat earth, cough
lol
During the entire video I was waiting for Bermurda Triangle.
Goodness!!! How did you miss it??
Planes fly over the Bermuda Triangle all the time.
Yeah I've flown to Bermuda and back like 6 times and nothing happens, its just a regular flight.
oh yeah! they do.......
the myth has been hacked.....
planes do fly over Bermuda Triangle
1. Hawaii is in the pacific ocean.
2. To get to hawaii by plane, it must travel across the pacific ocean.
3. Plans CAN travel over the pacific ocean.
You seem to have not listened. They can fly over it but choose not to as, apart from Hawaii, it would be a major detour that could be avoid simply by flying over the Atlantic.
Title of video: Why planes can't fly over Antarctica. My idea for the video: Why you can't fly over the USA
Even bird don’t fly to the Mecca
Nutt nutt Do you have an explanation with the source?
For my religion that Mecca is god house and bird cannot fly on Mecca the only fly over mecca
I have seen many videos and photos in which birds are resting on roof of holy Kaba.
Mayank Rajput but not at the top of the holy ka abah the square the bird in top of it
You know what they used to say If Bullsith could fly this place would be an airport!
1) I fond out from a pilot friend hat the issue of continual compass adjustment in the Canadian Arctic has much been resolved by using satellite services as an alternative to the compass. Nonetheless communications in the arctic are notable more difficult than further south.
Does anyone actually believe that the reason commercial jets don't fly over antarctica is because of mountains and snow lol
Tell us the real reason then.
I bet Area 51 is a no fly zone because incoming UFOs need to land
True
no fly zone but Russian planes fly over it couple of times?
Loma so funny
Lol
Area 51 is not real because if I went there I would never see a sign that says AREA 51 DO NOT ENTER but that’s fake man that’s so wrong
Planes don't fly over Antarctica, because this continent has a hole through which you contact the Hollow Earth. DUH!
Ummmm....when we went to Australia, we flew from SFO to Sydney, direct. Pretty sure that was the Pacific ocean below us. Heck, we even came back the same way.
They go over this in the video.
Title: why planes dont fly over antarctica?
Me: why would they?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha .....
shorter flights
Holiday inn Antarctica.
Because earth is flat
Me: why do they want to explain it ?
Now I know that runways are numbered by how many degrees off true north they are. I have wondered why they were numbered the way they are. I’m actually speechless. So good to come across a video where one actually learns something new.
Strong magnetic field over mecca?!? Is it true??
True
@@evaddungu2238
so.. mecca really a sacred place.
@@captigaular YES it is... if you go there you will feel a different type of peace and tranquility maybe you haven't experienced before. Trust me I'v been there. AMAZING.
No. Complete BS. There are geomagnetic maps of the world available online; there is nothing significant around Mecca.
no
Mostly rubbish
Airplanes co not navigating on a magnetic compass
The magnetic poles are far from the geographic poles
The main reason is that there are no alternate airports in the area
Why planes dont fly over the north pole...because we would see too much. That's why
Planes routinely fly from Vancouver to Hong Kong and Manilla to Vancouver. I've done them both.
#3 is plain false. I did fly many times from Dallas to Shanghai and never once used the east route.
Every international flight I have taken from California to Asia and back has flown via the Pacific ocean.
Sure they the routes were further north but they were traversing the Pacific.
You nailed it my friend. THE EARTH IS FLAT
I have flown direct from Sydney Australia to California. Years ago we would stop in Hawaii then continue to America. All I ever saw was water below. If it wasn't the Pacific ocean I don't know what else it could be.
Because, earth is flat. And u can see the limits or infinity in antartica
Dont think so probly just fly around antarctic .
What tttttt no
earth is a sphere
@@qumi369 nope
Everytime I see a video like this I see people like you flat earthers
Last July I flew from Los Angeles to Sydney then back again a few days later. Both times I flew straight across the Pacific Ocean.
Planes actually does fly over tibet, the Chengdu airlines, and the Yunnan airlines are two airlines that have flight routes that flies over tibet. Normally on a plane that flies over the tibet, 2 pilots and 1 co-pilot will be flying the plane.
Mountain climbers that want to climb the Himalayas will fly to Kathmandu (If I spelt it correctly) Airport, also known as one of the most dangerous airports in the world; there would be parts of the Himalayas terrain in its approach path.
you made a error on planes wont fly over the pacific ocean I have traveled that route many times
They didn't say they don't fly over the Pacific, they just said that very often it's quicker to fly over the Arctic.
@@nacoran Planes fly over the Arctic in just a few flights like: Los Angeles-Dubai, Los Angeles-Doha, Newark-Singapore (and not always) New York-Hong Kong, and a few more
@@nacoran They most certainly DID say planes don't fly over the Pacific. Then they turned around and said "it isn't true per se, because there is a shorter route." But this is STILL WRONG. EVERY flight from the mainland US to Hawaii, and EVERY flight from much of the western US to Asia, Oceania, the Phillipines, New Zealand, etc. fly over the Pacific. This video is GROSSLY misleading on that point.
@@nacoran Not just that, options for emergency landing are far and few between over the Pacific. Along the continental path, they are everywhere.
*Everything involving planes, Antarctica and the deep sea scares the .... out of me!* 😳
3. Planes from USA to Australia absolutely do fly over the Pacific Ocean.
JohnboyMN Yes sir. And also from the continental US to Hawaii.