Actually, I live there closer to Dubai, is really hot there in Dubai, so in November, weather will be fine, also from November to March for all people visit to Dubai cuz is a _Perfect_ weather to stay in Dubai can’t wait for summer ends cuz temperature start to cooling
The reason the planes dont fly directly over the poles has nothing to do with CAN'T!!! They dont want the people to see what's at the poles. Dont believe me? Look at the poles on Google earth. They are covered 100% of the time, Not by accident.
Well, after seeing this i'm gonna establish a no fly zone over my new blender, I just bought it & the last thing i want is for a plane to crash into it. This is also for the safety of my cat
Runways are numbered according to how close they are aligned to magnetic North, not true North. Also, magnetic North is not located at the North pole, which invalidates your answer as to why they won't fly over the North pole. On routes between Canada and Northern Europe, they do fly very close to the poles. Commercial airliners are not 100% dependent on an accurate magnetic compass. Their primary compass is gyroscopic. The magnetic compass only serves as a backup should the gyroscopic compass fail, GPS fail and whatever ATC radar is available for vectors fails. They use chart software built into the Flight Management Computer (FMC) to determine what their course over ground needs to be which translates to the heading they need to follow to stay over their trackline. Whoever provided your information is wrong. Maybe check your information with a professional pilot next time? It is quite a disservice to provide inaccurate information to the public.
@@GeoEstes Redundancy is key in aviation. There was a time when ariplanes with 2 engines could not fly between US and Europe. Specifically because people thought they would have no redundancy. Also, the airspace is not 'free for all'. While Gyro and GPS work as back-up to one another, ATC vectoring exists to also facilitate safety margins between different aircraft in the sky. @David Morgan FCM generally plots waypoints and the track is referenced to those waypoints, not the whole route itself.
IKR, it’s not like oh Disney world has a no fly zone cause they don’t want a plane landing there. It’s because of 9/11. How do they not know historical facts? It’s basically History 101, Large place and has big buildings and is recognizable worldwide.
for the Area 51 one, only their security helicopters (they have helicopters that covers the ground that the ground security can't reach) and the fighters jets they have out there are allowed to fly for testing purposes only. The only civilian aircraft that can fly over to Area 51 is the JANET lines coming in from Las Vegas, which is basically Area 51 workers from Vegas.
Planes do fly over the Pacific Ocean when they are heading to Hawaii, when they fly to Asia from the West Coast they head North over Alaska and head West. They fly this route to avoid the headwinds which would cause them to burn more fuel fighting the headwinds blowing from West to East.
I'm pretty sure that have been scenic flights over Antarctica from New Zealand since 2013. Prior to that there were scenic flights from 1977-1979; It ran for such a short time because of the Mt. Erebus Disaster (Air New Zealand Flight 901).
"Strong magnatic field in Mecca". I have looked all over the internet for research to verify this information and I found zero. Kindly site your references used to make this video
Vincent Goudreault I read that it is in a NEW Scientist article years ago. Can’t see why they’d make it up so I think you’re wrong there mate. I’m not a Muslim either so have no bias either way.
Most hilarious deflection video ever! Deflecting anyone from thinking on their own! The penguins won't like it! It's just better to stay away from the poles! Great entertainment!
Miss information is a real problem...whatever it takes to keep sheep from using their own brain is what the gutless yellow media has been perfecting for decades
1:00 there’s a thing called IFR- Instrument Flight Rules. Basically, you fly mainly using instruments, so you can fly in low visibility conditions. Also, if you are at cruising altitude, there’s a very high chance you’ll fly over the windy/snowy conditions. Also for 3:55 there are some A340s fitted with oxygen tanks so if there is a decompression, the air supply would last longer that the average 15 mins. (sorry for the rant)
Sorry @@cornbisque . Qantas do a tourist trip over the joint,. ""Approximately three hours south of Australia, passengers will usually see the first scattered ice followed by dozens of icebergs and ice floes. We then cross the South Magnetic Pole where you will start to view the rugged mountainous topography of the Antarctic mainland.""
So two things. 1. You are telling me that planes solely rely on magnetic poles in an old school compass and not computer guided systems and gps? 2. You are telling me that at 33,000 feet there are complete white out snow storms? I'm having a hard time with either of these.
I flew to NZ from Seattle, and Sydney to Honolulu, flying over the Pacific, dude. On the other hand it was so hot in Phoenix one time we just rolled to LA.
Santiago - Sydney is an Antartica route, performed by a 4 Engine Aircraft under a maintenance program for high reliability, Performed only during the south hemisphere summer, not for weather reasons, but for comercial reasons. Inertial and GPS signals are now the primary source of navigation, per law, a regular compass is installed on every aircraft, a special permit is given for such routes that magnetism navigation is not practical. Aircraft don’t flight over the Everest because there is no airway over it, and who doesn’t like a photo of the highest mountain. Many twin engines aircraft can’t flight routes if they don’t have an airport with in 60 minutes in-route, but if is maintain under ETOPs maintenance program, the could fly up to 120 minutes of flight to the nearest airport in-route.
Umm...... If planes don't fly over the Pacific Ocean then what is the route that is taken when flying from YVR to SYD?? From posted flight paths it looks like all flights fly over the Pacific Ocean.
@@TonyP9279 All the Asian flights from the west coast do, only the east coast ones fly over Europe and central or southern Asia. For example, Singapore Airlines flights from LAX/SFO/SEA direct to SIN and SIN via HKG/Tokyo fly over the Pacific, while SQ flights from Newark fly over Europe and South Asia. Of course US/Canadian flights to Australia and NZ also fly over the Pacific. Dallas/Houston flights fly over Mexico and then enter the Pacific Ocean for the long haul down under. Vancouver, SFO and LAX flights fly across the Pacific Ocean to Australia and ditto for Honolulu-Aus/NZ flights. Soon there will be a Chicago-Brisbane service which will also fly over the Pacific Ocean.
@@umont13 alot of misinformation, first video I've watched from these guys, and I don't see how they've gotten so many subs legitimately, feels like they are the sort of people who would say "don't take dihydrogen monoxide because it's posionous" despite dihydrogen (H2) monoxide (O) being water (H20)
Umont12 for example, airplanes do fly over over the South Pole just not normally. It is VERY common for planes to fly over the North Pole. The reason that planes normally don’t fly over the South Pole is a certification called ETOPS (Engines Turn Or People Swim) basically if they loose an engine, how long can the plane stay aloft on one engine. If the time that it can be aloft isn’t long enough to make it to a airport, then that is out of the certification zone.
I have flown between the US and Japan and Guam MANY times, never once did I fly over Europe or the middle east to get there. Also, I lived in Kuwait for 11 years, the average summer temp runs around 120 F, sometimes even hotter, I am in the aviation industry and have been for 30 years, I have never seen planes grounded for it being too hot.
Air New Zealand used to fly over Antarctica carrying sightseers between 1977 and 1979, then flight 901 crashed there on the 28th November 1979, and the flights were cancelled forever. They never used that flight number ever again
I’ve flown multiple times to Asia and never has the route been from West to East. We’ve always gone over the Pacific Ocean, often sticking to the coasts for as long as possible (In case of emergency landings.)
There used to be till a few years ago a bi weekly transpolar flight over the south pole between Auckland, New Zealand and Buenos Aires, Argentina, and planes don't use magnetic compasses, they use gyroscopic or laser compasses and GPS so the magnetic poles don't affect the navigation.
1) I fond out from a pilot friend hat the issue of continual compass adjustment in the Canadian Arctic has much been resolved by using satellite services as an alternative to the compass. Nonetheless communications in the arctic are notable more difficult than further south.
Aashi JHANJI no, it has to do with the direction of jet streams. Why fly against the wind when you can use it as boost. Which means saving money for airlines.
There are many other no flying zones around the world. In Brasilia, Brazil flying over the region called "Pilot Plan" (Plano Piloto), where the federal administration buildings and embassies are located, it´s a no fly zone. Ten years ago, a private pilot wanted to check what would happen if he flies over the Planalto Palace (where the president works) and he was followed by Brazilian air force planes that forced him to land and he got arrested and sued for violating federal air space.
Yeah my parents flew that route last week. They go further south generally for better winds when going westwards. There was also a big storm. They got 400km from Antarctica.
Same, I flew from San Diego, CA to Cebu over the Pacific as well landed in Hawaii and continued the trip in the same direction and came back the same way lol.
Anytime to fly to Asia out of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland or Seattle, you're going to fly across the Pacific Ocean. The only ones that fly across Europe to get to places like Singapore are any flights that have stops in places like Abu Dhabi or Qatar. Everyone else flies across the Pacific with stops in Honolulu, Japan, a few places in China, Taiwan, Guam, etc.
Ummmm....when we went to Australia, we flew from SFO to Sydney, direct. Pretty sure that was the Pacific ocean below us. Heck, we even came back the same way.
1:on October 5, 2021, a Qantas 787 flew over Antarctica. 2:why don’t we use ILS approach thing? also, there are no no-fly zone around Disney. in ww2, China had some flights with the dc3 around Mount Everest
The reason why planes don't really fly above Antarctica is because of the ETOPS rating for most planes are too low for it to make a landing as it's going above the Antarctic. Nearest airport from there would be somewhere down in New Zealand or Australia which is around 8-10hrs away from the center of the Antarctic. Planes that flew above it were 4 engined planes. Pan Am flight 50 is a good example, they used a 747SP to go through there.
Já existem muitos vôos ETOPS de "apenas" dois motores. Já há motores com níveis de fiabilidade tão grande que não é necessário quatro. A principal razão será porque não é o caminho mais curto em nenhum vôo.
my god i loathe this video, and pretty much all other videos this guy has made. im convinced this is a misinformation campaign to detest future pilots.
Nah, get the heck outta here, hater. Edit: Dude, I’m telling you, the reply’ers’ ,that doesn’t like your opinion, are pretty much more patient and possibly smarter than you. :/ I dunno about myself though
Hmmm v interesting. A magnetic field in the north and south poles. And in Mecca, in the middle of the middle East. And could it also be the centre of the Earth?
@@PurePeacePower yes, mecca is in the centre of Earth. Especially at the Ka'ba (the black cube in the middle of mecca). No birds, planes nor helicopter fly over there.
Every international flight I have taken from California to Asia and back has flown via the Pacific ocean. Sure they the routes were further north but they were traversing the Pacific.
For Kennedy, I've actually seen a helicopter with a gunner out on the side just in case if anyone wants to try something since the visitor complex attracts visitors daily, not only from the US, but from around the world as well.
Now I know that runways are numbered by how many degrees off true north they are. I have wondered why they were numbered the way they are. I’m actually speechless. So good to come across a video where one actually learns something new.
Great video. FYI runways are numbered for their magnetic heading in 2 digits rounded to the closest 10 degrees. (Example magnetic heading of the runway is 193 degrees the runway would be 19, if the magnetic heading was 247 it would be runway 25).
I live just up the road from Mount Vernon in Alexandria and I have to say planes fly very close to Mount Vernon. Since they follow the course of the Potomac River when flying in and out of Reagan Airport, you come very close to Mount Vernon and can actually see it when it isn't particularly cloudy
Is there really a practical need for commercial airliners to fly over Antarctica, and who wants to risk flying over an extensive zone that is often the coldest on Earth?
@@nacoran Planes fly over the Arctic in just a few flights like: Los Angeles-Dubai, Los Angeles-Doha, Newark-Singapore (and not always) New York-Hong Kong, and a few more
@@nacoran They most certainly DID say planes don't fly over the Pacific. Then they turned around and said "it isn't true per se, because there is a shorter route." But this is STILL WRONG. EVERY flight from the mainland US to Hawaii, and EVERY flight from much of the western US to Asia, Oceania, the Phillipines, New Zealand, etc. fly over the Pacific. This video is GROSSLY misleading on that point.
The gyrocompas has been primary for decades; magnetic is backup. GPS issues have been overcome; the accuracy is good enough for route flying, and is supplemented by differential GPS for precision landing systems.
@@catherinehermansen4376 My first flight over a half-centuray ago was a pre-WWII gullwing Stinson Reliant; we had to wait for the gyro to spin up, so they have superseded magnetic for a long time. After that, the newer Aeronca Champ had only magnetic, simpler and cheaper.
You seem to have not listened. They can fly over it but choose not to as, apart from Hawaii, it would be a major detour that could be avoid simply by flying over the Atlantic.
What? Everytime I fly to and from Japan from Canada, we go over the Pacific, you'd fly even further going over Europe first. Even going from Newfoundland, it's always a stop over in Toronto or Montreal, and then to Japan going west in Canada, never east.
Kulet Loft Flights in the fall and winter from the orient to North America fly over the Pacific Ocean to take advantage of the “roaring forties” the jet streams that help shorten the flight time by increasing ground speed. This video has so many errors it is shameful.
@@captigaular YES it is... if you go there you will feel a different type of peace and tranquility maybe you haven't experienced before. Trust me I'v been there. AMAZING.
We use magnetic headings to fly. But these days with modern avionics and with the help of inertial navigation system we are able to fly using true headings. As a matter of fact inertial systems measure headings based on true north and use earth variation to calculate headings based on magnetic north.
I have flown direct from Sydney Australia to California. Years ago we would stop in Hawaii then continue to America. All I ever saw was water below. If it wasn't the Pacific ocean I don't know what else it could be.
Hey there, Brightsiders! Which of these places would youlove to visit?
I would like to visit your google/youtube account so I can delete it permanently, thank you.
@@ROOTZDNB Thank you my friend
Area 51
Malacañan Palace in the Philippines is also a no fly zone..
Actually, I live there closer to Dubai, is really hot there in Dubai, so in November, weather will be fine, also from November to March for all people visit to Dubai cuz is a _Perfect_ weather to stay in Dubai
can’t wait for summer ends cuz temperature start to cooling
This should have been titled "Why Planes Wont Fly Over Certain Places" instead of "Why Planes Don't Fly Over Antarctica"
What
No one cares. Why don’t u make a video named “Why planes don’t fly over certain places” if you’re so smart
Tell em my friend
This is supposed to be a way to lure people into watching the video. Don’t worry you’ll get used to it.
Antarctica will capture peeps more
So at 33,000 feet you would get a whiteout? I call BS.
Yeah total bs
The reason the planes dont fly directly over the poles has nothing to do with CAN'T!!! They dont want the people to see what's at the poles. Dont believe me? Look at the poles on Google earth. They are covered 100% of the time, Not by accident.
Dark Thoughts magnetic compasses are one of the mandatory instruments required for flight.
Mate I think your right I ain't no flat earther but something smells rotten in d state of Denmark
Too windy 😂
Planes do fly over pacific ocean from LAX and SFO to Asia like Japan, Korea and Hong Kong. And to Hawaii
And they do fly very close to North Pole from New York to Hong Kong
They lied
It’s false, planes fly over the pacific all the time
I agree..this video is a lie..
Obviously they haven't done enough research.
Well, after seeing this i'm gonna establish a no fly zone over my new blender, I just bought it & the last thing i want is for a plane to crash into it. This is also for the safety of my cat
Not if I establish a no blender zone under my flight route.
@@haraka8123 lol
Wehner we go inside a blender in a airplane we just get mixed up outside the airplane & we die!
Runways are numbered according to how close they are aligned to magnetic North, not true North. Also, magnetic North is not located at the North pole, which invalidates your answer as to why they won't fly over the North pole. On routes between Canada and Northern Europe, they do fly very close to the poles. Commercial airliners are not 100% dependent on an accurate magnetic compass. Their primary compass is gyroscopic. The magnetic compass only serves as a backup should the gyroscopic compass fail, GPS fail and whatever ATC radar is available for vectors fails. They use chart software built into the Flight Management Computer (FMC) to determine what their course over ground needs to be which translates to the heading they need to follow to stay over their trackline. Whoever provided your information is wrong. Maybe check your information with a professional pilot next time? It is quite a disservice to provide inaccurate information to the public.
I thought they primarily used GPS these days.
@@GeoEstes Redundancy is key in aviation. There was a time when ariplanes with 2 engines could not fly between US and Europe. Specifically because people thought they would have no redundancy. Also, the airspace is not 'free for all'. While Gyro and GPS work as back-up to one another, ATC vectoring exists to also facilitate safety margins between different aircraft in the sky.
@David Morgan FCM generally plots waypoints and the track is referenced to those waypoints, not the whole route itself.
Hmm, answer seems to be invalidated?
I would like your view on the reason given for not flying over Antarctica , considering commercial aircraft cruise at over 30,000 ft ?
goose72 Goose72 What's the reason to fly over Antarctica? There are no airports for emergency landing. And no radio connection.
It should be called BS side, instead of Bright side.
Yes, there are a lot of lies in this. Garbage. Planes fly over the north pole all the time. Mecca does not have any magnetic force.
Bs is brawl stars
@@zincfive derp.. Antarctica is at the bottom of the earth......
Oh and it's "The Rain in Spain FALLS mainly on the plane".. Muppets!!!
Well Bright Side in short form is BS.
I am a pilot and I don't approve this video. Man, so many wrong facts..
Such as?...........
???
IKR, it’s not like oh Disney world has a no fly zone cause they don’t want a plane landing there. It’s because of 9/11. How do they not know historical facts? It’s basically History 101, Large place and has big buildings and is recognizable worldwide.
I subscribed you Sir
Exactly
for the Area 51 one, only their security helicopters (they have helicopters that covers the ground that the ground security can't reach) and the fighters jets they have out there are allowed to fly for testing purposes only. The only civilian aircraft that can fly over to Area 51 is the JANET lines coming in from Las Vegas, which is basically Area 51 workers from Vegas.
Title: "Why planes don't fly over Antarctica"
Air New Zealand flight 901: "Am i a joke to you?"
Lol😂
That is right. This DC10 crashed there. The same year Flight 191 DC10 crashed in Chicago.
Hold up, does ANZ 901 actually fly over Antarctica?
@@Cpr1234 yeah, cuz the crash location of ANZ 901 is in Antartica
@@Cpr1234 No, They use to fly into Mc Murdo Sound and then onto Mt Erabus , And then return, No plane has ever flown over Antartica,
Planes do fly over the Pacific Ocean when they are heading to Hawaii, when they fly to Asia from the West Coast they head North over Alaska and head West. They fly this route to avoid the headwinds which would cause them to burn more fuel fighting the headwinds blowing from West to East.
I Was Really Expecting More Facts On Antartica
It is still a good video
in your dreams
☹️
I was expecting 'any' facts on Antarctica.
Antarctica is a forbiden place, couse they are lying about Earth. UA-cam Eric Dubay to find out more.
I'm pretty sure that have been scenic flights over Antarctica from New Zealand since 2013.
Prior to that there were scenic flights from 1977-1979; It ran for such a short time because of the Mt. Erebus Disaster (Air New Zealand Flight 901).
"Strong magnatic field in Mecca". I have looked all over the internet for research to verify this information and I found zero. Kindly site your references used to make this video
There is no reference because that is a BS claim. There is nothing magnetically special about Mecca.
It's totally false. Just respecting a religious tradition.
Vincent Goudreault I read that it is in a NEW Scientist article years ago. Can’t see why they’d make it up so I think you’re wrong there mate. I’m not a Muslim either so have no bias either way.
@@joejitsu034 a research would be more credible... If you can provide the research you've read that would be most appreciated
There's a giant Gamecube(the black one not the purple) that uses a magnet & laser to read the giant mini disc that stores the games.
Area 51 Is right next to Groom Lake search it up on Google Earth
We know
haha lol
It is hidden among bombing ranges, a good reason to stay out.
That’s where the naruto runners will be running in
🙄
Most hilarious deflection video ever! Deflecting anyone from thinking on their own! The penguins won't like it! It's just better to stay away from the poles! Great entertainment!
Miss information is a real problem...whatever it takes to keep sheep from using their own brain is what the gutless yellow media has been perfecting for decades
Airplanes aren’t allowed to fly over Lionel Messi’s house either
Right
Why
( I think it' s clickbait )
true
Why do you alwas goke 🏁.
First when i saw the text,I taught it said: why planes dont fly over america.
I just..... °0°??? But now i know that i was wrong.....
Why planes like to fly into buildings in America
They don’t try to. Like the twin tower incident; they crashed. It wasn’t the pilot’s fault either.
I’m just saying it wasn’t the pilot’s fault. The crash wasn’t really an accident.
My birthday has history
Skinny Jeans he says it’s not the pilots fault he never said it’s an accident. The pilot got attacked so it isn’t his mistake.
1:00 there’s a thing called IFR- Instrument Flight Rules. Basically, you fly mainly using instruments, so you can fly in low visibility conditions. Also, if you are at cruising altitude, there’s a very high chance you’ll fly over the windy/snowy conditions.
Also for 3:55 there are some A340s fitted with oxygen tanks so if there is a decompression, the air supply would last longer that the average 15 mins.
(sorry for the rant)
No a340s have that every plane is the same
You can fly to Antarctica from Australia every summer and you cross the Pacific on a long haul flight from Sydney to Los Angeles
I prefer boat, because we NEVER fly on planes dispite my step dad being a PILOT!!!😠😠😠 AND ALL OUR VACATIONS GET CANCLED DIFFERENT REASON EVERY YEAR!
IKR but some people be special and not use their head and proper research
Wayne Stobbe last comment was for you
Wayne Stobbe that’s impossible. The only flights that get close to Antarctica Are Sydney/ Auckland to Santiago/ Buenos Aires.
Sorry @@cornbisque . Qantas do a tourist trip over the joint,. ""Approximately three hours south of Australia, passengers will usually see the first scattered ice followed by dozens of icebergs and ice floes. We then cross the South Magnetic Pole where you will start to view the rugged mountainous topography of the Antarctic mainland.""
So two things.
1. You are telling me that planes solely rely on magnetic poles in an old school compass and not computer guided systems and gps?
2. You are telling me that at 33,000 feet there are complete white out snow storms?
I'm having a hard time with either of these.
The real reason is the same reason they censored the North Pole from google earth and don’t let people visit Antarctica
yeah this vid is complete bs 💩
Plane does fly over north pole
Plane does fly over Tibet
Plane does fly over Pacific Ocean
But if they say so, some lies will come up
cant fly over antarctica as its impossible to do so
bruh
As if you could fly over Antarctica in the first place, you’d fly through it rather.
The North Pole is the Arctic. You have lost all credibility. Your comment is moot.
There is so much wrong with this video, I'm just gonna stop watching
Same. Only click-bait nonsense here.
In addition to the incessant artificial camera shake
Saaaaame
Same...I didn't finish it
I lost 3.3 million brain cells
I flew to NZ from Seattle, and Sydney to Honolulu, flying over the Pacific, dude. On the other hand it was so hot in Phoenix one time we just rolled to LA.
Santiago - Sydney is an Antartica route, performed by a 4 Engine Aircraft under a maintenance program for high reliability, Performed only during the south hemisphere summer, not for weather reasons, but for comercial reasons. Inertial and GPS signals are now the primary source of navigation, per law, a regular compass is installed on every aircraft, a special permit is given for such routes that magnetism navigation is not practical. Aircraft don’t flight over the Everest because there is no airway over it, and who doesn’t like a photo of the highest mountain. Many twin engines aircraft can’t flight routes if they don’t have an airport with in 60 minutes in-route, but if is maintain under ETOPs maintenance program, the could fly up to 120 minutes of flight to the nearest airport in-route.
If planes can't go over the Pacific Ocean then how are they going to get to Hawaii??
Completely over, man!
Didn't listen too carefully did you?
The plane flies underground oviuslly
Good point
Umm......
If planes don't fly over the Pacific Ocean then what is the route that is taken when flying from YVR to SYD??
From posted flight paths it looks like all flights fly over the Pacific Ocean.
Can't fly over Pacific Ocean, then how do you fly from Los Angeles International Airport to Hawaii?
Seriously?
Every Asian flight I can think of flies over North Pacific/Artic Circle routes from N. America.
@@TonyP9279 Yep. Every morning when it's clear, you can see a busy lane up above if you live on the west coast.
@@TonyP9279 All the Asian flights from the west coast do, only the east coast ones fly over Europe and central or southern Asia. For example, Singapore Airlines flights from LAX/SFO/SEA direct to SIN and SIN via HKG/Tokyo fly over the Pacific, while SQ flights from Newark fly over Europe and South Asia. Of course US/Canadian flights to Australia and NZ also fly over the Pacific. Dallas/Houston flights fly over Mexico and then enter the Pacific Ocean for the long haul down under. Vancouver, SFO and LAX flights fly across the Pacific Ocean to Australia and ditto for Honolulu-Aus/NZ flights. Soon there will be a Chicago-Brisbane service which will also fly over the Pacific Ocean.
@@RW4X4X3006 Most Australian and Asian flights depart LAX and SFO late at night and arrive into these cities in the early morning.
i found myself questioning way too much info in this video...u can do better
It's fake.
Same here and I couldn't even find a few points to verify there authenticity.
This was like, "babies first; dont worry about Antarctica just go away"
i lost alot of braincells reading this.
This video is so incorrect it should be taken down.
James Hanley why Is it incorrect?
@@umont13 alot of misinformation, first video I've watched from these guys, and I don't see how they've gotten so many subs legitimately, feels like they are the sort of people who would say "don't take dihydrogen monoxide because it's posionous" despite dihydrogen (H2) monoxide (O) being water (H20)
Umont12 for example, airplanes do fly over over the South Pole just not normally. It is VERY common for planes to fly over the North Pole. The reason that planes normally don’t fly over the South Pole is a certification called ETOPS (Engines Turn Or People Swim) basically if they loose an engine, how long can the plane stay aloft on one engine. If the time that it can be aloft isn’t long enough to make it to a airport, then that is out of the certification zone.
Thank you. These people are trying to lie to people
@@jameshanley7052 in this video that was mentioned but only in other words :)
I have flown between the US and Japan and Guam MANY times, never once did I fly over Europe or the middle east to get there. Also, I lived in Kuwait for 11 years, the average summer temp runs around 120 F, sometimes even hotter, I am in the aviation industry and have been for 30 years, I have never seen planes grounded for it being too hot.
Exactly been Alaska then down to Japan or Honolulu then Japan.
They grounded planes in Arizona because the asphalt temperatures 140f or 60c the highest the asphalt can get is 180f or 82.2c
Air New Zealand used to fly over Antarctica carrying sightseers between 1977 and 1979, then flight 901 crashed there on the 28th November 1979, and the flights were cancelled forever. They never used that flight number ever again
An aeroplane crashed into Mt Erebus in Antarctica.
Air New Zealand.
Flight 901, it should have been mentioned
Still the 19th worst crash of all time
And it was the 4th worst at that point
At 6:42 the pin for Texas was in North Dakota area
Bright side is Stoopid
BS. Modern jetliners
do not navigate using a magnetic compass.
I’ve flown multiple times to Asia and never has the route been from West to East. We’ve always gone over the Pacific Ocean, often sticking to the coasts for as long as possible (In case of emergency landings.)
There used to be till a few years ago a bi weekly transpolar flight over the south pole between Auckland, New Zealand and Buenos Aires, Argentina, and planes don't use magnetic compasses, they use gyroscopic or laser compasses and GPS so the magnetic poles don't affect the navigation.
Only the compass
Runways are marked by compass degrees useing the magnetic compass, not by the diffrence in true north
There ARE flights that fly over the Pacific Ocean.
Seriously, your lack of research has hampered the credibility of your channel.
Hawaii for one.
Auckland to Los Angeles Sydney to Dallas ever heard of ETOPS?
they did not say cant or wont, they said usually wont.
Karan Vij they want money they don't care about anything else
Cathay Pacific...The west coast to Hong Kong.
"Why don't planes fly over Australia?"
*Because then it would be upside down*
?
Australia isn't even real
Australia actually makes upside down planes so they can fly around there
So the United States and the rest of the world is on its side?
@@daybot9592 indeed
I bet Area 51 is a no fly zone because incoming UFOs need to land
True
no fly zone but Russian planes fly over it couple of times?
Loma so funny
Lol
Area 51 is not real because if I went there I would never see a sign that says AREA 51 DO NOT ENTER but that’s fake man that’s so wrong
1) I fond out from a pilot friend hat the issue of continual compass adjustment in the Canadian Arctic has much been resolved by using satellite services as an alternative to the compass. Nonetheless communications in the arctic are notable more difficult than further south.
As a freighter pilot I flew over the Himalayas. It was like you could almost touch them
Planes do fly over Pacific Ocean Just not a straight line
Aashi JHANJI no, it has to do with the direction of jet streams. Why fly against the wind when you can use it as boost. Which means saving money for airlines.
No plane flies in a straight line
Mark Griffith ikr!? I live in Japan. Each flight always flies over the Pacific Ocean. I’m confused.
There are many other no flying zones around the world. In Brasilia, Brazil flying over the region called "Pilot Plan" (Plano Piloto), where the federal administration buildings and embassies are located, it´s a no fly zone. Ten years ago, a private pilot wanted to check what would happen if he flies over the Planalto Palace (where the president works) and he was followed by Brazilian air force planes that forced him to land and he got arrested and sued for violating federal air space.
PLANES DON'T FLY OVER ANTARCTICA BECAUSE THERE IS NO ROUTES THAT GO THAT WAY DIRECTLY.
Patrick Ireland Wrong! Sydney-Johannesberg route does. Qantas sends 747’s.
and navigation i guess
There are no routes because it’s dangerous
@@jnf_media_ If you run a great circle mapper; that route doesn't go far enough south to reach Antarctica.
Yeah my parents flew that route last week. They go further south generally for better winds when going westwards.
There was also a big storm. They got 400km from Antarctica.
BS. I flew from BC Canada to Philippines over Pacific Ocean.
Same, I flew from San Diego, CA to Cebu over the Pacific as well landed in Hawaii and continued the trip in the same direction and came back the same way lol.
Same we go to plane I dont know where we go but I know that we flew over the Pacific ocean
He clickbaits that's why
Anytime to fly to Asia out of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland or Seattle, you're going to fly across the Pacific Ocean. The only ones that fly across Europe to get to places like Singapore are any flights that have stops in places like Abu Dhabi or Qatar. Everyone else flies across the Pacific with stops in Honolulu, Japan, a few places in China, Taiwan, Guam, etc.
Ummmm....when we went to Australia, we flew from SFO to Sydney, direct. Pretty sure that was the Pacific ocean below us. Heck, we even came back the same way.
They go over this in the video.
1:on October 5, 2021, a Qantas 787 flew over Antarctica. 2:why don’t we use ILS approach thing? also, there are no no-fly zone around Disney. in ww2, China had some flights with the dc3 around Mount Everest
The reason why planes don't really fly above Antarctica is because of the ETOPS rating for most planes are too low for it to make a landing as it's going above the Antarctic. Nearest airport from there would be somewhere down in New Zealand or Australia which is around 8-10hrs away from the center of the Antarctic. Planes that flew above it were 4 engined planes. Pan Am flight 50 is a good example, they used a 747SP to go through there.
Já existem muitos vôos ETOPS de "apenas" dois motores. Já há motores com níveis de fiabilidade tão grande que não é necessário quatro. A principal razão será porque não é o caminho mais curto em nenhum vôo.
What a bunch of BS
about flying over Antarctica
Galaxial Pharmaceutical hah lier. Because the plant floats on water for a good period of time bc the wings act as a pontoon.
There is no South Pole on a flat earth.
@@Xinthose Good thing we don't live on one of those then.
think about the penguins
Yeah, think about the penguins
my god i loathe this video, and pretty much all other videos this guy has made. im convinced this is a misinformation campaign to detest future pilots.
Report them.
Last July I flew from Los Angeles to Sydney then back again a few days later. Both times I flew straight across the Pacific Ocean.
This guy is in love with planes he talks about airplanes all the time
It's not a guy, it's a corporation that steals videos and lies to their subs
And it's bcoz he has the greatest frustration of having his own airplane
Wendover Productions called.
2:56
Bright side “Due to the earths spherical shape”
Flat earthers:”IM TRIGGGGGREEEEEED REEEEEEEEEEE
This is so full of complete NONSENSE that it should be removed.
Exactly
Dave Bosworth ahemmmm, nah IF YOU HATE IT THEN GET THE *FXCKING* COMMENT SECTION!
Get the heck out of here hater
Hahahalol
Nah, get the heck outta here, hater.
Edit: Dude, I’m telling you, the reply’ers’ ,that doesn’t like your opinion, are pretty much more patient and possibly smarter than you. :/ I dunno about myself though
I love how put a red no no sign over crossing the pacific ocean. cough flat earth, cough
lol
Liar, I just rode the clouds over the Pacific Ocean last night, duhh. I have flown over that puddle over 20 times so far
Planes can't cross Antarctica because of Earth's solid invisible firmament. Duuuuhhh
Strong magnetic field in Mecca? Where the Ka'ba is at? Where muslims pray towards? This cant be a coincidence
Hmmm v interesting. A magnetic field in the north and south poles. And in Mecca, in the middle of the middle East. And could it also be the centre of the Earth?
Can a oblate spheroid (sphere) have its centre on its surface???
Or do you believe that earth is flat 😂🤣??
Love God idk
@@PurePeacePower yes, mecca is in the centre of Earth. Especially at the Ka'ba (the black cube in the middle of mecca). No birds, planes nor helicopter fly over there.
Then why NO birds Doesn't fly above of the kaba sarif? Can you explain?
Every international flight I have taken from California to Asia and back has flown via the Pacific ocean.
Sure they the routes were further north but they were traversing the Pacific.
During the entire video I was waiting for Bermurda Triangle.
Goodness!!! How did you miss it??
Planes fly over the Bermuda Triangle all the time.
Yeah I've flown to Bermuda and back like 6 times and nothing happens, its just a regular flight.
oh yeah! they do.......
the myth has been hacked.....
planes do fly over Bermuda Triangle
This could've been more well put together if just some research would've been done
Pilot:
ICEBERG RIGHT AHEAD, HARD TO STARBOARD!
Co-Pilot: bruh
😂😂😂
For Kennedy, I've actually seen a helicopter with a gunner out on the side just in case if anyone wants to try something since the visitor complex attracts visitors daily, not only from the US, but from around the world as well.
...because the Earth is flat and we live in a "Globe".
Thank you boy genius. I was strolling through the comments to see who brave enough to say it before I do.
cowboy7995 the fact this has 21 likes makes me lose faith in humanity
bruh everyone knows the earth is round bc how do boats sail on the ocean without falling off the edge? THE EARTH IS ROUND THAT'S WHY!
Search "Operation Fishbowl" and Admiral Byrd for a few hrs... and then come back here.
Based and red pilled
I thought this was gonna be an interesting smart video, then I realized it was a bright side top 10 video
Now I know that runways are numbered by how many degrees off true north they are. I have wondered why they were numbered the way they are. I’m actually speechless. So good to come across a video where one actually learns something new.
Great video. FYI runways are numbered for their magnetic heading in 2 digits rounded to the closest 10 degrees. (Example magnetic heading of the runway is 193 degrees the runway would be 19, if the magnetic heading was 247 it would be runway 25).
Runways are numbered based on its Magnetic Heading...not how far from True North they are...just saying
yea lol ikr
There is a route from New York ( John F. Kenedy ) to Singapore ( Changi ), fly through north Pole.
Title: why planes dont fly over antarctica?
Me: why would they?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha .....
shorter flights
Holiday inn Antarctica.
Because earth is flat
Me: why do they want to explain it ?
I live just up the road from Mount Vernon in Alexandria and I have to say planes fly very close to Mount Vernon. Since they follow the course of the Potomac River when flying in and out of Reagan Airport, you come very close to Mount Vernon and can actually see it when it isn't particularly cloudy
I live in New Mexico 🇲🇽
Need to look over this again Brightside, most facts on this video are wrong.
I think the word 'all' is more relevant here.
@@paulanderson79 I wouldn’t say all, but many are incorrect
Then why are you referring to them as "facts"
YOu shouldn't be surprised... It's Brightspace
While Qantas: let’s do a Antarctica scenic flight :D
there is a good reason this video has over 3000 thumbs down
No kidding. So many inaccuracies.
Cause they didn't get to fly over Antarctica
On the Bright Side, they've got 37 Million subscribers 😎
@@SlowedAesthege it's too dangerous to
Very interesting! I'd love to see the Himalayas.
Is there really a practical need for commercial airliners to fly over Antarctica, and who wants to risk flying over an extensive zone that is often the coldest on Earth?
me at 3am: I think it's time to sleep
UA-cam: hey, do you want to know why planes dont fly over antarctica?
ge lo same just its 2:47 am
you made a error on planes wont fly over the pacific ocean I have traveled that route many times
They didn't say they don't fly over the Pacific, they just said that very often it's quicker to fly over the Arctic.
@@nacoran Planes fly over the Arctic in just a few flights like: Los Angeles-Dubai, Los Angeles-Doha, Newark-Singapore (and not always) New York-Hong Kong, and a few more
@@nacoran They most certainly DID say planes don't fly over the Pacific. Then they turned around and said "it isn't true per se, because there is a shorter route." But this is STILL WRONG. EVERY flight from the mainland US to Hawaii, and EVERY flight from much of the western US to Asia, Oceania, the Phillipines, New Zealand, etc. fly over the Pacific. This video is GROSSLY misleading on that point.
@@nacoran Not just that, options for emergency landing are far and few between over the Pacific. Along the continental path, they are everywhere.
BECAUSE THE EARTH IS FLAT AND ANTARTICA IS THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE UNIVERSE.
hmmmm
I love how you think the gvmt is afraid to tell you what the earth is. But they tax you and send your kids to die in pointless wars in t+e desert
I search the comments just to find this 🤣
The earth is round
@@SavageP.9000 faith based information. Sorry real science shows Flat world.
You mean magnetic north pole vs the axis. They all use GPS now anyway.
No, not really. GPS has a latency that makes it still unapproved as primary system for aircraft navigation
@@vincentgoudreault9662 fair point
The gyrocompas has been primary for decades; magnetic is backup. GPS issues have been overcome; the accuracy is good enough for route flying, and is supplemented by differential GPS for precision landing systems.
I flew a 47 cub special so no gps. I didn't use electronic E6B either. Seat of your pants flying was just so much more fun, but then I'm old.
@@catherinehermansen4376 My first flight over a half-centuray ago was a pre-WWII gullwing Stinson Reliant; we had to wait for the gyro to spin up, so they have superseded magnetic for a long time. After that, the newer Aeronca Champ had only magnetic, simpler and cheaper.
1. Hawaii is in the pacific ocean.
2. To get to hawaii by plane, it must travel across the pacific ocean.
3. Plans CAN travel over the pacific ocean.
You seem to have not listened. They can fly over it but choose not to as, apart from Hawaii, it would be a major detour that could be avoid simply by flying over the Atlantic.
You know what they used to say If Bullsith could fly this place would be an airport!
What? Everytime I fly to and from Japan from Canada, we go over the Pacific, you'd fly even further going over Europe first. Even going from Newfoundland, it's always a stop over in Toronto or Montreal, and then to Japan going west in Canada, never east.
Because, earth is flat. And u can see the limits or infinity in antartica
Dont think so probly just fly around antarctic .
What tttttt no
earth is a sphere
@@qumi369 nope
Everytime I see a video like this I see people like you flat earthers
planes have route flying in pacific ocean like japan to US "DIRECT FLIGHT
Kulet Loft Flights in the fall and winter from the orient to North America fly over the Pacific Ocean to take advantage of the “roaring forties” the jet streams that help shorten the flight time by increasing ground speed. This video has so many errors it is shameful.
My guess it depends what area of Asia and what area of N America.
Strong magnetic field over mecca?!? Is it true??
True
@@evaddungu2238
so.. mecca really a sacred place.
@@captigaular YES it is... if you go there you will feel a different type of peace and tranquility maybe you haven't experienced before. Trust me I'v been there. AMAZING.
No. Complete BS. There are geomagnetic maps of the world available online; there is nothing significant around Mecca.
no
We use magnetic headings to fly. But these days with modern avionics and with the help of inertial navigation system we are able to fly using true headings. As a matter of fact inertial systems measure headings based on true north and use earth variation to calculate headings based on magnetic north.
It's a bit scary that 16k people upvoted this when it's so inaccurate. I hope they do a little research on their own.
That's what internet does for ppl. Sad
#3 is plain false. I did fly many times from Dallas to Shanghai and never once used the east route.
planes don't fly over MY mama's house. she has really good hearing and is that good at complaining. bless her heart........
You nailed it my friend. THE EARTH IS FLAT
Because we learned our lesson, traveling through ice
It’s not through ice but over it.
Because you know why? Because earth is flat
No it’s because after they fly over Antarctica they reach the North Pole and they don’t want Santa to be mad and put them in the bad list.
Today, modern aircraft use GPS to navigate, they no longer rely on compasses.
Actually, Sydney to Johannesburg with Qantas’s B747 flies over Antarctica just a little! Check it out on youtube!
Planes fly over the Pacific Ocean all the time. In the same north to south manner....
Polar flights too.
Also Hawaiian Planes
I have flown direct from Sydney Australia to California. Years ago we would stop in Hawaii then continue to America. All I ever saw was water below. If it wasn't the Pacific ocean I don't know what else it could be.
Because you would discover other liveable lands outside the ice ring.