Catherine was doomed from the start. She pretty much sealed her own fate by not telling the king she wasn't a virgin. And having an affair with ANYONE knowing about it - was extremely bad judgment considering what he did to A.Bolyn. Poor girl was young and whimsical ....very sad case. Henry was a real life monster!
I don’t understand “And having an affair with ANYONE knowing about it - was extremely bad judgment….” I’m sorry but that line doesn’t make any sense. Who was having the affair/s; the Queen or the King?
Given the horrific punishments handed out during these times I'm amazed any other man was able to perform with Henry VIII's wives, a little difficult to stay focused on the job in hand while unable to block the potential fates from your mind. I feel in reality many of the accusations were just that and many confessions and statements were forced by the unpleasant tortures also available during these times.
It was practically suicidal to have intimate affairs with the Kings wife & as far as his "legal" team were concerned you were guilty regardless as to whether you actually did get intimate with the Queen or not because as happened with Anne Bolyn she was accused of sleeping with her own brother & was only found guilty when he succumbed to being tortured & by admitting to something that he probably wasn't guilty of he condemned them both to death because sleeping with the Queen was high treason & the only punishment available was death by axe 🪓 if you were a serf (commoner) & death by sword if you were royalty like I said you were effectively guilty regardless as to whether or not you actually were or not
@@martinthrone7012 actually, Mark Smeaton was the only one who confessed under torture. The accused gentlemen were not allowed to be tortured under the law, so Cromwell tortured the commoner Smeaton to build a case. The gentlemen accused of adultery with Anne Boleyn maintained their innocence.
A time in history when treason and foolishness could go hand in hand, and passion and unbelievable recklessness likewise. At least as far as Catherine and Culpeper are concerned. Dereham seems like he caught the shortest straw of his century. Damn.
This is what happens when these so called Royals think they are God's command on earth, when in truth these are ordinary ppl who's ancestors became the toughest warlord who ruled by fear, it's basically the Mafia!
This shows you how lucky we are to live in a democracy. Not some crazy king dishing out methods of torture to gain a confession. What else will you say when they are pulling your limbs apart?
A little more to it than that....there were many letters between she and her lovers. The penalties were harsh for a reason, to act as a deterrent, if you didn’t overstep the mark, you had nothing to fear. Simple!
Good day, and Thank You. I hope you're doing well. I'm learning every day from your Excellent channels! I Appreciate it more than I can say! Thank You.
I love your videos! And your script is so informative and interesting! I'm wondering whether you could possibly read it with a more natural cadence? I'm not sure if you're aware of it but you're reading it with a repetitive rhyming beat
The narration is just fine. A producer of UA-cam content can't tailor make content to suit each different individual subscribers wishes. That would be silly, especially on free to view content.
It sounds like he's reading it from a script instead of just speaking naturally. It makes his speech very monotone. I don't hate it, and I can follow it with no great issue, but a more natural cadence to his delivery would make our host seem more likeable and make the stories more enjoyable. He's discussing the craziest subjects but there's little to no emotion in the narration! It's crazy. I agree - if he were to change this facet of the videos, and maybe get a little excited during the exciting parts, and sad during the sad parts, he'd garner more subs. UA-cam creators get better over time. Hopefully he'll improve and become a bit more personable.
Catherine Howard was such a sad lot she was. Being used and abused by men prior to being married to the aged and obese King. Then to be executed for a fling with a man who was younger and more to her liking. When I read and listen to documentaries about Catherine Howard, I really feel sorry for her.
@@YortOK I don't see what's so funny about what I wrote concerning Catherine Howard. Her life's end was fkd up and you're laughing about it taking it as a joke like some schadenfreude idiot.
There were a few parts to the series the tudors that I've had some issues with but imo they covered Catherine Howard's execution and those with her quite well. Ill always remember how they used her dancing scene just prior to death to show she had so much life left to live.
Yes there were lots of inaccuracies but I still loved it but I got sick some of the stuff like Henry's sister Margaret married the king of Portugal ??? what was that all about
@@jackiegardiner7422 I know he had a sister who married the King of Scotland. She was the mother of Mary Queen of Scots and grandmother of James I King of Scotland and England.
They had more dangerous exercises at which he had once excelled. At some point he got a leg wound that never healed, resulting in pain, reeking smells, and pustules for the rest of his life, if perhaps at intervals. One of the grosser but more sympathetic aspects of the man's life.
@@DJJinxC2006 I see what you mean. Maybe they should have read the local newspaper or gossip magazine to get a better feel for life at court during Henry’s reign. Or they could have gone down to the Tower of London to see others being executed for dilly-dallying with Henry’s wives and rate their own chances of getting away with it.
The full sentence passed upon those convicted of High Treason up to 1870 was as follows: „That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution where you shall hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King‘ s pleasure.“ From the late 18th century on, men sentenced for high treason would be spared the whole procedure; usually you were hanged by the neck till death, then followed the butchering process: you’re privy parts were cut off, the intestines taken out and burnt (or just replaced within the corpse afterward), your head severed off your neck and, in the case of an public execution shown around. Often the real quartering wasn’t carried out anymore, the same goes for the „drawing“ part, pulling out the bowels.
King Henry VIII was a sadistic mass murderer who enjoyed using the "toys" in the "Tower of London" -- more accurately, a dungeon and torture chamber -- to cause devilish pain and suffering and torment of people's frail bodies. You can find this monster walking around the Lake of burning brimstone in Hell every day at 08-00 h, ready for his morning swim. After "dying" from being burnt to death, he is revived and the process begun every 30 min on the dot, each day and every day for all eternity. At Christmas, he is given a reprieve, and he is hung until almost dead, drawn and quartered and his entrails eaten by monsters as he is still squirming in pain. His torn body is picked over by evil crows with red eyes which fight for morsels of meat.
Who in the world dreamt up such a brutal and gruesome way to kill someone? Hanged and brought back to consciousness then disemboweled and castrated then beheaded and quartered. What a barbaric way to treat a human. Unbelievable! 😮
I truly enjoyed this video. I'm a fan of history and particularly the English monarchies. You've done a great job putting together so many images. Your narration, is that your natural speech rhythm or is it an affection? I (personally, just myself) found it distracting almost to the point of obnoxious. Do you suppose this is simply a cultural peccadillo?
My understanding was that she was stitched up, framed, by the King's co-horts because he wanted rid of her - so they just made up a story that she was seeing other men.
@@debbierowley8833 Try not getting so upset about someone admitting they didn't know about the subject, and was saying so - obviously. People might think you're very, very sad.
Messing with the wife of the king potentially corrupts the line of succession by introducing the possibility of her pregnancy and the birth of a child who might be presumed by some to be the king's, might later claim to be the king's, or might indeed be the king's, but they would never be able to tell for sure. An intolerable risk of future civil war and rebellion is thus introduced. Alternatively, everybody just blithely assumes it's the king's but the possibility remains some other man's bastard thus inherits the throne under false pretenses. What king would tolerate that? It's like tolerating passing all your money to some other man's son, except to the nth degree.
In the quaint world of morality that saints, seers and men of great wisdom have created for us, men can have women, but women cannot have men. Yet simple mathematics will show that this is not possible, so the formula has to be modified to imply that only privileged men can have a lot of women. Other men can go climb trees. Of course, either way, women cannot have a lot of men unless they hide them
@Patricia...Guilty people point the finger at others proclaiming their guilt...Ive seen it my whole life and it happens regardless of gender or station of life.People with internal problems if they dont get them under control always thinks its everyone elses fault but their own...things never change.Henry was an adulterer,murderer along with many other terms.If you pissed off Henry God help you he was absolutely viscous and nothing was ever his fault and he would not look at his own sin to forgive yours...because to Henry he had no sin.
@@riazhassan6570 Right,but Henry took it to an extreme that is so ridiculous that I believe it helped the common man over time to reign in the monarchs powers
They didn't play back in those days did they some gruesome medieval execution methods. And god help you if you got on the bad side of the monarch especially Henry VIII.
Katherine was a young girl, who was let down by her Aunt who whilst Katherine was in her care, did not take proper control of Katherine. There is no allegedly necessary here, she was caught red handed....she paid the price, rightly or wrongly, for having loose morals, and the price, especially as Queen, was death. This was the law of the time, she knew the risks, and paid with her life, sad, but not unfair, you live and die by the laws in place at the time you lived. C’est la vie...ou la mort.
I hate that he thought it was okay to be unfaithful anytime he wanted - but his wives were not. It’s cruel. I would not be ok with my husband flauntingly screwing other women. Such a double edged sword.
Is Tyburn still extant? If so, what's on the spot now? Maybe a slaughterhouse or gas station? Or perhaps a surgery where circumcisions or drive-in vasectomies are performed. Since I have never had the pleasure of visiting Tyburn I can only speculate on what goes on there nowadays. A helluva place to visit, no doubt.
You think it's OK for Henry the Eighth to execute two of his Six Wives ..Henry the Eighth was a murderous tyrant, His two Wives he had beheaded did not deserve what happened to them..I'm so glad that Henry was terrified when he was dying..He knew what would happen to his black soul when he took his last breath...Let's hope he's still in Hell to this day...
Anne, that's why I've remained with the same one for 37 yrs. Should I've made Henry's same mistake, frankly beheading 1 or 2 could be an option... LOL!
@@annefox6552 Back then "murderous tyrant who executed people he didn't like" was pretty much the job description of a king. And to give Henry a little credit, the purpose of much of his wife shopping and chopping was to get enough sons to guarantee the succession and avoid a repeat of the nasty Wars of the Roses of the 1400's.
Why are the deaths of spoiled aristocratic women so fascinating? Death was an every day occurence and still is. These women were not important and should not be made into more than they were - brood mares!
@@liquidsnake6879 Really? Been to China recently? According to Amnesty International they execute at least 3 people each day. We are talking about Tudor England. My point is that over 400 people were executed in the Tower of London, mostly men, but most people can only name 2 women! WHy?
@@billburr5881 Who gives a f*** about China? Are you Chinese? do you live in China? Why would english speakers be more concerned with China than their own history?
This history has been written by king view I doubt about it. it is difficult to do such act when there was so much security. A fool can do this thing it was blame game. But it is just.
After i watch this episode, i have 1 thing to say. Back in the old days, execution was cruel and unusual punishment (by today standard). Today execution is a gentle passage into after life.
@@maxsdad538 Well, compared to what could happen to one at the time, little. But one needed a real expert to do it quickly and properly. Still better than the traditional hanging, drawing and quartering that long awaited traitors.
You know how some people combine asphyxiation with auto eroticism to intensify the orgiastic potential. Dangerous practice, people have died while trying this out (one of the Carradines who act in the movies?), but yet some folks still attempt to do it. Moral of the story: Danger, especially life-threatening risk, adds an agreeable 'frisson' to any erotic encounter.
How on earth do u suppose this person post the actual execution?? There were no cameras or camcorders bck then, if you were expecting a reenactment maybe try typing that in search bar - these videos are more informative than they are visual. Back in those days they painted people/portraits/battle reenactments/churches/etc. The artist's & the historians are the reason we know ANYthing about these time periods, really....
As a Culpepper (and, therefore, as a direct descendant of Pepin), I resent this slur on Thomas' name. I wonder, though, if he was such a friend of Henry, how could Henry have let him be executed. Probably envy of his name, since Culpepper is a much more ancient name than Tudor.
Didn't Henry VIII start the Church of England?
That religion must be very proud to have such a holy man as its founding leader.
*IT's CaLLed -> Righteous Justice!!!!*
*I canNOT Understand wut Ever Language he Speaks!!!!*
Typical ignorance, are you Catholic? Research YOUR holy father....some of the most evil men in history, and still going on.
Catherine was doomed from the start. She pretty much sealed her own fate by not telling the king she wasn't a virgin. And having an affair with ANYONE knowing about it - was extremely bad judgment considering what he did to A.Bolyn. Poor girl was young and whimsical ....very sad case. Henry was a real life monster!
Biggest thing about him was his ego...
He should've known but when you have Little bodyparts I guess you can't tell 😁.
@@robertallen6710 : Then later on in life, his belly.
I don’t understand
“And having an affair with ANYONE knowing about it - was extremely bad judgment….”
I’m sorry but that line doesn’t make any sense. Who was having the affair/s; the Queen or the King?
Wish we could still do that. Henry was far too merciful with Catherine. She deserved to be burned alive.
Given the horrific punishments handed out during these times I'm amazed any other man was able to perform with Henry VIII's wives, a little difficult to stay focused on the job in hand while unable to block the potential fates from your mind. I feel in reality many of the accusations were just that and many confessions and statements were forced by the unpleasant tortures also available during these times.
Job in hand? Interesting choice of words 😂
@@JohnSmith-xx9th I have to confess to that being an intentional choice of words, I was wondering who'd be the first to notice 😜
It was practically suicidal to have intimate affairs with the Kings wife & as far as his "legal" team were concerned you were guilty regardless as to whether you actually did get intimate with the Queen or not because as happened with Anne Bolyn she was accused of sleeping with her own brother & was only found guilty when he succumbed to being tortured & by admitting to something that he probably wasn't guilty of he condemned them both to death because sleeping with the Queen was high treason & the only punishment available was death by axe 🪓 if you were a serf (commoner) & death by sword if you were royalty like I said you were effectively guilty regardless as to whether or not you actually were or not
@@martinthrone7012 actually, Mark Smeaton was the only one who confessed under torture. The accused gentlemen were not allowed to be tortured under the law, so Cromwell tortured the commoner Smeaton to build a case. The gentlemen accused of adultery with Anne Boleyn maintained their innocence.
They should still do this tbh nowdays
The rich had it tough the poor had it far worse back in the day.
IDK not having as much responsibilities seems way more peaceful. Especially for those living in rural areas.
A time in history when treason and foolishness could go hand in hand, and passion and unbelievable recklessness likewise. At least as far as Catherine and Culpeper are concerned. Dereham seems like he caught the shortest straw of his century. Damn.
Dereham got grabbed by the short straws?
If those rules applied today the house of lords would be empty so would the commons😂
Imagine seeing your burned genitals waving in front of yours eyes, sick sick man Henry 8th was.
Henry VIII was a real
Scoundrel.
I agree,sometimes I wonder if its possible that some info isnt true because it was sanitized post fact by Henry and his surviving court.
This is what happens when these so called Royals think they are God's command on earth, when in truth these are ordinary ppl who's ancestors became the toughest warlord who ruled by fear, it's basically the Mafia!
There shouldn't be any Royals in this day & age, Power to the People ✊️
@@jamilhussain5421 I think even Charles would admit it's total insanity even to have a concept of 'royalty'...
He was VILE!!!
This shows you how lucky we are to live in a democracy. Not some crazy king dishing out methods of torture to gain a confession. What else will you say when they are pulling your limbs apart?
Are you sure it’s democracy? You can’t even do elections right. Results not accepted by some 70 million. Sounds like third world crap country
@@JohnSmith-xx9th we did it right. Trump really lost. He knows it, we all know it. Just won't admit it.
The Tory parties wet dream !
Insanety.
A little more to it than that....there were many letters between she and her lovers. The penalties were harsh for a reason, to act as a deterrent, if you didn’t overstep the mark, you had nothing to fear. Simple!
That whole story is just sad. 😢
Good day, and Thank You. I hope you're doing well. I'm learning every day from your Excellent channels! I Appreciate it more than I can say! Thank You.
I love your videos! And your script is so informative and interesting! I'm wondering whether you could possibly read it with a more natural cadence? I'm not sure if you're aware of it but you're reading it with a repetitive rhyming beat
The narration is just fine. A producer of UA-cam content can't tailor make content to suit each different individual subscribers wishes. That would be silly, especially on free to view content.
@@Handlebar-MustDash I think his viewership deserves to double, even triple, and it would, if he changed only this one small aspect.
I love his projection and cadence. He’s easily understood and the English accent seals it for me! No changes for me, please!
@@Garden366 okay! That's fantastic, his content is amazing and very well written
It sounds like he's reading it from a script instead of just speaking naturally.
It makes his speech very monotone.
I don't hate it, and I can follow it with no great issue, but a more natural cadence to his delivery would make our host seem more likeable and make the stories more enjoyable.
He's discussing the craziest subjects but there's little to no emotion in the narration! It's crazy.
I agree - if he were to change this facet of the videos, and maybe get a little excited during the exciting parts, and sad during the sad parts, he'd garner more subs.
UA-cam creators get better over time. Hopefully he'll improve and become a bit more personable.
Catherine Howard was such a sad lot she was. Being used and abused by men prior to being married to the aged and obese King. Then to be executed for a fling with a man who was younger and more to her liking. When I read and listen to documentaries about Catherine Howard, I really feel sorry for her.
😂
@@YortOK I don't see what's so funny about what I wrote concerning Catherine Howard. Her life's end was fkd up and you're laughing about it taking it as a joke like some schadenfreude idiot.
@@onagaali2024 🤣
@@YortOK you're a clown.
🤔
😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Can we talk about the fact that Henry VIII looked like a reddit moderator?
Can we talk about the fact that in period costume, Alex Jones would look EXACTLY like Henry VIII
@@YortOK found the offended Reddit user
@@YortOK 😆
😁
Acted like one too lol
Why would this man even hook up with her? Not a gamble a wise person would take.
She was fit and up for sneaking around. I mean, it probably would've been fine had the idiot not left her letter to him lying around.
It happened before Catherine even met the King, when she was living somewhere managed by her step grandmother.
There were a few parts to the series the tudors that I've had some issues with but imo they covered Catherine Howard's execution and those with her quite well. Ill always remember how they used her dancing scene just prior to death to show she had so much life left to live.
I tried watching but I got so annoyed by the innacuracy
Yes there were lots of inaccuracies but I still loved it but I got sick some of the stuff like Henry's sister Margaret married the king of Portugal ??? what was that all about
Execution was grim
Except that she practiced for her death naked.
@@jackiegardiner7422 I know he had a sister who married the King of Scotland. She was the mother of Mary Queen of Scots and grandmother of James I King of Scotland and England.
King Hank didn't look like he missed any meals.
Didn't they have gyms or health clubs, back then?
They had more dangerous exercises at which he had once excelled. At some point he got a leg wound that never healed, resulting in pain, reeking smells, and pustules for the rest of his life, if perhaps at intervals. One of the grosser but more sympathetic aspects of the man's life.
@@randomobserver8168 Didn't he once do jousting until he suffered a head injury; after which his behaviour got much worse and erratic.
It is a mystery to me as to how Henry managed to get those vast amounts of food through that tiny mouth.
🏆🏆🏆🇺🇲🙏
Thank you for sharing
This happened so often during Henry 8th’s reign, these men and women should have been more careful. Didn’t they read their history books?
In what history book could they have read that portrayed anyone in quite the same light as Henry?
@@DJJinxC2006 I see what you mean. Maybe they should have read the local newspaper or gossip magazine to get a better feel for life at court during Henry’s reign. Or they could have gone down to the Tower of London to see others being executed for dilly-dallying with Henry’s wives and rate their own chances of getting away with it.
@@silentwitness247 how would they read something without a head ?
There were few history books and even nobles didn't read well
Another thing, there w're no local newspapers till 1609 lol en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_newspaper_publishing
It is good to be king. The same solution to every problem.
The full sentence passed upon those convicted of High Treason up to 1870 was as follows:
„That you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution where you shall hanged by the neck and being alive cut down, your privy members shall be cut off and your bowels taken out and burned before you, your head severed from your body and your body divided into four quarters to be disposed of at the King‘ s pleasure.“
From the late 18th century on, men sentenced for high treason would be spared the whole procedure; usually you were hanged by the neck till death, then followed the butchering process: you’re privy parts were cut off, the intestines taken out and burnt (or just replaced within the corpse afterward), your head severed off your neck and, in the case of an public execution shown around. Often the real quartering wasn’t carried out anymore, the same goes for the „drawing“ part, pulling out the bowels.
King Henry VIII was a sadistic mass murderer who enjoyed using the "toys" in the "Tower of London" -- more accurately, a dungeon and torture chamber -- to cause devilish pain and suffering and torment of people's frail bodies. You can find this monster walking around the Lake of burning brimstone in Hell every day at 08-00 h, ready for his morning swim. After "dying" from being burnt to death, he is revived and the process begun every 30 min on the dot, each day and every day for all eternity. At Christmas, he is given a reprieve, and he is hung until almost dead, drawn and quartered and his entrails eaten by monsters as he is still squirming in pain. His torn body is picked over by evil crows with red eyes which fight for morsels of meat.
The lower astral plane then...
If only!
@@arianbyw3819 Arianbyw --👍👍
@@terryblaize294 Terry -- Yes! Hell, not heaven.
I agree.
Who in the world dreamt up such a brutal and gruesome way to kill someone? Hanged and brought back to consciousness then disemboweled and castrated then beheaded and quartered. What a barbaric way to treat a human. Unbelievable! 😮
*WeLLLL, at Least He was BeHeaded BEFORE he was Quartered & so the Quartering Doesn't MaTTer !!!!*
I truly enjoyed this video. I'm a fan of history and particularly the English monarchies. You've done a great job putting together so many images. Your narration, is that your natural speech rhythm or is it an affection? I (personally, just myself) found it distracting almost to the point of obnoxious. Do you suppose this is simply a cultural peccadillo?
Pp❤
DEATH RIDES A PALE HORSE AND HELL FOLLOWS AFTER
Horrifying. I'll never understand how people could watch that!
If not for the ambition of her uncle Tom she would have lived a half way decent life
yet, here we are doing the same thing! thank you for the upload.
So cruel them days ,
Gruesome
🏰 *TOWER OF LONDON* 🏰
We meet again! 🗡️
Did Henry ever gently execute anyone?
I mean, Culpepper got his head chopped off. That's about as gentle an execution as you could hope for in the 16th century
Henry missed getting a hold of Novachuk. King Putin, the first seems to have a patent on that one.
he wanted Anne Boleyn's death to be by a sword and by an extremely experimented executionner so her death would be "merciful".
My understanding was that she was stitched up, framed, by the King's co-horts because he wanted rid of her - so they just made up a story that she was seeing other men.
Try researching from proper sources, like archives and not google!
@@debbierowley8833 Try not getting so upset about someone admitting they didn't know about the subject, and was saying so - obviously. People might think you're very, very sad.
Why would he kill men who had relations with his queen, after all, he was having women himself , wasn't we
Messing with the wife of the king potentially corrupts the line of succession by introducing the possibility of her pregnancy and the birth of a child who might be presumed by some to be the king's, might later claim to be the king's, or might indeed be the king's, but they would never be able to tell for sure. An intolerable risk of future civil war and rebellion is thus introduced. Alternatively, everybody just blithely assumes it's the king's but the possibility remains some other man's bastard thus inherits the throne under false pretenses. What king would tolerate that? It's like tolerating passing all your money to some other man's son, except to the nth degree.
In the quaint world of morality that saints, seers and men of great wisdom have created for us, men can have women, but women cannot have men. Yet simple mathematics will show that this is not possible, so the formula has to be modified to imply that only privileged men can have a lot of women. Other men can go climb trees. Of course, either way, women cannot have a lot of men unless they hide them
@Patricia...Guilty people point the finger at others proclaiming their guilt...Ive seen it my whole life and it happens regardless of gender or station of life.People with internal problems if they dont get them under control always thinks its everyone elses fault but their own...things never change.Henry was an adulterer,murderer along with many other terms.If you pissed off Henry God help you he was absolutely viscous and nothing was ever his fault and he would not look at his own sin to forgive yours...because to Henry he had no sin.
@@wirelessone2986 Old monarchical axiom-the king can do no wrong. Whatever he does is the right thing to do. Of course, nobody else has similar rights
@@riazhassan6570 Right,but Henry took it to an extreme that is so ridiculous that I believe it helped the common man over time to reign in the monarchs powers
They didn't play back in those days did they some gruesome medieval execution methods. And god help you if you got on the bad side of the monarch especially Henry VIII.
Katherine was a young girl, who was let down by her Aunt who whilst Katherine was in her care, did not take proper control of Katherine. There is no allegedly necessary here, she was caught red handed....she paid the price, rightly or wrongly, for having loose morals, and the price, especially as Queen, was death. This was the law of the time, she knew the risks, and paid with her life, sad, but not unfair, you live and die by the laws in place at the time you lived. C’est la vie...ou la mort.
some very unflattering pictures of poor Catherine
Firm but fair, he didnt mess about with the queen again
You’re a sad disgusting soul
Who in their right mind would have an affair with Henry's wife. Talk about having a wish to die a horrible death.
it was before Katherine was Queen.
Spoiler Alert Henry was not a virgin either LOL
Henry VIII ruined the name. His was the last English monarch of that name. I wonder if Henry actually consummated his marriage to Katherine Howard?
Well there are numerous productions about this . I like the one with Keith Michell
The King behaved like an oaf.
Okay but what did you think was gonna happen sleeping with the king’s wife is a recipe for disaster
as it was then it is today, be watchful whom you screw
I hate that he thought it was okay to be unfaithful anytime he wanted - but his wives were not. It’s cruel. I would not be ok with my husband flauntingly screwing other women. Such a double edged sword.
What evil....
Henry the Hate
They were so effing brutal in those days so disgusting Game of Thrones alright
The paintings of Catherine aren't very flattering are they?
if I recall correctly it's so she doesn't appears as young as she was to hide the disgusting fact that henry married a minor.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW COME THEY DIDN'T RUN 🤨😡👎
What?? Mannox was 18 !
Good times
Atleast Karma came for Henry viii
everything is BRUTAL or HORRIFIC. it wasn’t it was an execution we ALL know about
Why no comments?
This video is so scary. Intimidating. 😬😬
comment
commentous comments
there ya go 👍
No one wants to talk to you or likes you, that's why
Saidi leave her alone
Is Tyburn still extant? If so, what's on the spot now? Maybe a slaughterhouse or gas station? Or perhaps a surgery where circumcisions or drive-in vasectomies are performed. Since I have never had the pleasure of visiting Tyburn I can only speculate on what goes on there nowadays. A helluva place to visit, no doubt.
It's where my garage is now. Lot of crazy stuff goes on still. E20 London, welcome anytime son.
Bet it was worth it though
Henry gets a bad rap. He actually only executed 2 of his wives. Only two out of six, most of us could not do any better.
Missed your point.
LOLed at that one, and no lie.
You think it's OK for Henry the Eighth to execute two of his Six Wives ..Henry the Eighth was a murderous tyrant, His two Wives he had beheaded did not deserve what happened to them..I'm so glad that Henry was terrified when he was dying..He knew what would happen to his black soul when he took his last breath...Let's hope he's still in Hell to this day...
Anne, that's why I've remained with the same one for 37 yrs. Should I've made Henry's same mistake, frankly beheading 1 or 2 could be an option... LOL!
@@annefox6552 Back then "murderous tyrant who executed people he didn't like" was pretty much the job description of a king. And to give Henry a little credit, the purpose of much of his wife shopping and chopping was to get enough sons to guarantee the succession and avoid a repeat of the nasty Wars of the Roses of the 1400's.
Why are the deaths of spoiled aristocratic women so fascinating? Death was an every day occurence and still is. These women were not important and should not be made into more than they were - brood mares!
Death by legalized state sanctioned public murder is absolutely not a daily occurence in most countries
@@liquidsnake6879 Really? Been to China recently? According to Amnesty International they execute at least 3 people each day. We are talking about Tudor England. My point is that over 400 people were executed in the Tower of London, mostly men, but most people can only name 2 women! WHy?
@@billburr5881 Who gives a f*** about China? Are you Chinese? do you live in China? Why would english speakers be more concerned with China than their own history?
Katherine Howard wasn't a spoiled brat. she was just a kid that was abused by older men !
*I canNOT Understand wut Ever Language he Speaks!!!!*
This history has been written by king view I doubt about it. it is difficult to do such act when there was so much security. A fool can do this thing it was blame game. But it is just.
A blame game.
As cabeças valiam pouco
After i watch this episode, i have 1 thing to say. Back in the old days, execution was cruel and unusual punishment (by today standard). Today execution is a gentle passage into after life.
What is (relatively speaking) "cruel and unusual" about a simple beheading?
They were both reckless and stupid to take such risks.
@@maxsdad538 Well, compared to what could happen to one at the time, little. But one needed a real expert to do it quickly and properly. Still better than the traditional hanging, drawing and quartering that long awaited traitors.
Today the death penalty is abolished in the UK. But back then they had some absolutely brutal medieval execution methods.
That is one of the stupidest three sentences I have ever read.
Don't diddle the king's Queen. It comes out bad all bad. 🤣
You know how some people combine asphyxiation with auto eroticism to intensify the orgiastic potential. Dangerous practice, people have died while trying this out (one of the Carradines who act in the movies?), but yet some folks still attempt to do it.
Moral of the story: Danger, especially life-threatening risk, adds an agreeable 'frisson' to any erotic encounter.
Obsessed with executions.
All these years later the world has Donald Trump…so marvellously similar to H8 in so many ways.
Henry wasn't a compulsive liar like trump
Are you sure you don't mean Anne Boleyn?
Hey! Same fella does the Holocaust videos?
very judgemental in regards to actions...its the way it was...and may be the norm again..
get someone else to read your texts wrong vice tone drone
Why horrific? That’s justice.
Savages
Who is the narrator? he has the most annoying voice. He needs to slow down his narration!!! It's not a race is it?
She was very much mi-used ....
more like she was abused by thoses men.
Clickbait now? Horrific execution? Come on now. I like your channel but if you keep this up I'm gone.
How on earth do u suppose this person post the actual execution?? There were no cameras or camcorders bck then, if you were expecting a reenactment maybe try typing that in search bar - these videos are more informative than they are visual. Back in those days they painted people/portraits/battle reenactments/churches/etc. The artist's & the historians are the reason we know ANYthing about these time periods, really....
Did you miss the part where the dude's nuts were cut off and shown to him while he was half-dead?
have you even seen the video ? it IS horrific !
Is Queen Elizabeth the 2nd who recently passed away related to Henry the eighth?.
DULL VOICE CHANGE THE NARRATOR !
SPEAK PROPERLY
If this is what they did to their own, what did they do to people in colonized countries? 🤮
As a Culpepper (and, therefore, as a direct descendant of Pepin), I resent this slur on Thomas' name. I wonder, though, if he was such a friend of Henry, how could Henry have let him be executed. Probably envy of his name, since Culpepper is a much more ancient name than Tudor.
You're a legend in your own mind.
Who's the narrator?
He's atrocious ! Really spoils this tutorial. He speaks like a 12 year old.
I actually love his voice, he's very clear and doesn't speak too quickly 😆
I totally agree!!!
Can't suppoh his channelll. And reads too fast
He was hideous
I slept with the momie Camille, it was the worst torture!!!, the idiot king Charles was watching!