SARDAR UDHAM (2023) | *PART 2/2* |FIRST TIME WATCHING | Movie Reaction | film Review |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 лис 2023
- This movie broke me !
A true masterpiece in sotry telling !
_____________________________________________________________________
NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO IT´S OWNERS
If you would like to see specific movie reactions, Let me know in the comments below or in my UA-cam or Patreon page polls !
And don't forget to Like and Subscribe guys !
you can become a member of my patreon here: / filmmaker_reactions
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
#SARDAR UDHAM, #SARDAR UDHAM SINGH #movie reaction, #reaction video, #film reaction, #movie review, #filmmaker reactions, #filmmaker reaction, - Фільми й анімація
Approximately 35 million people died in british induced famines in 200 years just because Indian food is diverted to british soldiers even in drought periods.
Bro, that's just the Bengal famine.
@@catcat63527 BRO I know.
Read my comment again seriously.
@@catcat63527 The choice of words:-
Brits attach the word "Great" to anything related to them.
Indians attach the word "just" to the name of an atrocity that killed Indians in a number so large that it was equal to half the Jews that Nazis killed.
@@death_paradewtf you talking about the deaths of Jews were only 11 million in total while the total death of indians in British rule were nearly 100 million and don't forget the 45 trillion dollors that were stolen alongside hundreds of historical pieces were also stolen
Another one.... The movie night reviewer......... 😎😎😎
The worst part you know is that this movie was nominated in Oscar's but removed it because it had shown against British imperialism.
You can react to other movies like kashmir files, Tashkent files, and Gumnami.
You said british are gonna appreciate the movie but the worst part is that the movie was nominated for oscars but removed it because it had shown against British imperialism unfortunately they haven't changed
This is sad and disgusting. Such a great movie...
Huge respect to u for watching this movie....
N now u know only 0.1% english brutality in India
He never found her in that chaos....
The soldiers were deliberately taken from Nepalese Gurkha units and Balochistan
25 Gorkha soldiers and 25 Baluchis armed with rifles
good to know. thanks :)
40:19 As far as I remember, those men who shot weren't Indians. They were veterans of the 1st World War (you remember how brutal that was). About half these soldiers were Gurkhas. Nepalis. The other half were Balochis from modern day South Western part of Pakistan. Britishers were good at turning people of the Indian subcontinent against each other: the so-called Divide-and-Rule policy. How else do you think they managed to rule a nation so much larger than their own? India, at the point when the British arrived, had already been under foreign occupation and rule for more than 800 years. What do you think incessant and successful foreign invasions for a thousand years where foreign rulers forcibly subjugate Indians and assimilate into the local population will do to the local population?
We were fractured by almost a millennia of invasions. And that was when the British arrived. It was like being down with a virus invasion (like Covid) and then a second sly virus (or maybe a parasite is more apt) arrives to wreck havoc on your body (India). And the parasite adapts to leverage the existing viral disease for its ends. That was exactly what it was like.
Had the British arrived right after the age of the Gupta Empire or the Mauryan Empire, they would have found a much more cohesive Indian society, which they wouldn't have been able to break or turn against one another. Their Divide-and-Rule would have failed them.
India has learned this lesson well, which is why today, Indians are wary of attempts by foreign powers that nurture and propagate the narrative aimed at dividing India along its many sub-national faultlines. This is something that UK of today still indulges in. Recently, even the Americans have publicly stated their desire for what they call "sub-national diplomacy", something that has raised alarm bells in the Indian strategic community. USA, after all, simply inherited the Divide-and-Rule policy from the Britishers and have been low-key keeping that flame burning against India since more than half a century as a weapon to use in case India ever becomes their enemy. The entire USA's narrative of "rules-based world order" is just a modern day reboot of the old British "White man's burden" narrative. They use virtue signalling and control over media to manufacture and spread their propaganda, then whenever it serves their national interests, they use all this propaganda and atrocity literature they have created as a _casus belli_ for military and economic action against their enemy nation. That is what the US-led Western world order does today.
Ofcourse many Indians (those of us that keep up with geopolitics) know about this already. USA doesn't want anybody that is not their vassal to grow strong. While today, it is China in US crosshairs, tomorrow, as India's economy (already about to become the world's third largest in a couple of years) grows larger than USA's, it will be India in the crosshairs. All that USA has been doing till now has been a complex dance of retarding India's rise and attempting to culturally invade and vassalize the nation while also partnering up with India to militarily counter China and maintaining a surface narrative about how the "World's oldest democracy (USA) and the world's largest democracy (India) should team up". Luckily for the USA, China is number one in the list that India recognizes as its adversaries, while USA is only a distant third. We're even trying our best to avoid confrontation with USA, like capping the range of our Nuclear missiles deliberately to ensure that they can't be used to target USA. Ofcourse US paranoia will likely mean that such acts of goodwill will fall on deaf ears. Such is the twisted nature of Great Power politics.
Even though India is not trying to fight USA, the simple act of India growing stronger has them seeing us as a threat that should be nipped in the bud.
Each of the word you wrote are true
@@SixShot07 Nah dude, I've studied this in detail. We are still using maraging steel instead of composite materials in the first stage casing and heavier hydraulic actuators instead of electromechanical or electronic ones. Yes we did understate the missile's range as is the norm, but we understated it as 5000 km range when its real range is around 8000 km.
It is pretty clear that Agni V range is 8000 km, not 16,000 km. So currently, we don't have an ICBM capable of targeting US mainland. And this is a political decision, not a technological limitation (I mean, we also produce the all-composite K-4 SLBM). We intend to not give the trigger happy Americans a casus beli. Which is why even though Agni VI design has been ready for a while now, it is not getting the political go ahead for testing.
That said, if push comes to shove we can use our SSLV or the new military space rocket (Project VEDA) to launch one of our MaRV/BGRV carrying our nukes to orbit and then have them de-orbit to hit USA. This method is called a "Fractional Orbital Bombardment System." But this approach is something that countries like US, China and India can easily defend against using their anti-satellite missiles.
Another idea, once ISRO develops its RLV in a couple more years, we can use it as a nuclear space bomber. Difficult to intercept it but it is still not reliable enough.
I think the final solution Indian planners have come up with is to develop a HGV for the same job. It is easier to hide the capabilities of an HGV than an ICBM. This will give Indian Strategic Forces Command a capability to hit US mainland while giving the Indian politicians the ability to deny that our capability can target USA. Again, final decision is political.
@@SixShot07 I have lived in these Army and DRDO officer circles half my life. I know how much to take at face value and how much these officers are just used to hyperbole. Still remember all those discussions I had about tanks in the Himalayas and how only few areas like Depsang Plains and Spanggur gap are tank country so "we don't really need light tanks" was the argument. And look at us now.
Look at how IAF used to say that PLARF will have limited utility because they'll need to fire 220 rockets to close an airfield this side and continue to fire in those volumes to ensure that our airfields remain unservicable. And look at us now, scrambling to get Pralay inducted post-Galwan. I still remember similar cope from the Air Force about cost-benefit analysis of PGMs and then Kargil happened.
Granted, we can easily get taken away by 10 foot Chinaman syndrome, but the opposite is also not true.
So don't take this stuff they say over evening tea or at the get-together very seriously.
So coming back to the point: yes we understate our capabilities, but in case of Agni V, we understated it as 5000 km when it was really 8000 km, not 16000km.
They even didn't nominated this film in there awards.
Too bad. Great film.
Just imagine yourself asking "Is anybody alive?"
Putting 10 of them on a single crate and taking them to hospital
hearth breaking
10:20 if he killed him in his house or anywhere. .. Probably we never knew him... Forget about u even Indians never knew his name... That's why he did in public place... So that the whole europe know about it... N they knew
This movie actually tears apart lots of hearts by showing the truth and through this movie people actually got to kno what actually has happened in those times and why india is always reluctant to take no shame in standing against the british even today and why have they been criticizing india for their achievements because for them they cannot take it that the country they ruled is growing today beyond their imagination and can guck with them in the future ...... India has outgrown british in terms of army publishing and economy and now they fear that they will be seen nowhere
It is a great film and a very sad one.
You forgot Space dude. Indian Space program is so much more capable and advanced than the UK Space program. Heck, whenever I find a Brit online talking about how we Indians should be thankful to them for providing us Railways, I point to the fact that India managed to create a top-tier Space Program, something that even UK couldn't do till today. So it is obvious that India would have gotten Railways regardless of whether the Brits invaded or not. Japan, for example, didn't have to be invaded for them to industrialize.
I am proud I am Indian....
Thank you for watching this movie
Please react to jai bhim (2021) an indian movie starring SURIYA ( Who was Rolex in vikram ) ita really amazing movie
Do react to "HIGHWAY" movie Starring Randeep Hooda & Alia bhatt....I m sure you will like and and thank me later🍺
I find no difference between nazi and the british
they were brutal too