Partial derivatives and graphs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 тра 2016
  • One of the best ways to think about partial derivatives is by slicing the graph of a multivariable function.
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @robertstan2441
    @robertstan2441 3 роки тому +51

    1:55 the thing my toilet sees everyday

    • @TechnoSan09
      @TechnoSan09 2 роки тому +3

      Oh man ,u see things differently
      Which normal persons can't visualize

  • @igg5589
    @igg5589 4 роки тому +32

    What software do you use for writing notes and slicing graphs?

  • @zes3813
    @zes3813 6 років тому +29

    This is art.

  •  3 роки тому +17

    Can't even think of a better way of explaining this. Thank you!

  • @jordanjacobson6046
    @jordanjacobson6046 3 роки тому +27

    Great video, my only little remark is that the way you write your twos makes them look a lot like a z, which would be fine in the single variable world, but since we are working with functions in three dimensions, it could be confusing for some people.

    • @joeybasile1572
      @joeybasile1572 11 місяців тому +1

      If someone thinks that is a Z in this context then lmfao

  • @MsChocolisious
    @MsChocolisious 7 років тому +66

    These videos make me happy to learn! ^_^

  • @navneet7075
    @navneet7075 3 роки тому +6

    You made my last 10 years man...
    No word to thank you...
    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @shahf13
    @shahf13 3 роки тому +5

    I have been struggling with this for a long time and in 2 videos you make it so clear and understood thank you so much

  • @TheLocoUnion
    @TheLocoUnion 2 роки тому +5

    This man is the Bob Ross of math!

  • @cybernaut_ev3106
    @cybernaut_ev3106 6 років тому +7

    Love the explanation and the graphics.

  • @Xx_Eric_was_Here_xX
    @Xx_Eric_was_Here_xX 2 роки тому +3

    thank you.. i had the intuition that the partial derivatives would form 'slices' of the surface to form curves, i just had such trouble visualizing it in my mind.. i also did not realize to form these slices you just have to pick a constant value for y, as you increment the constant value you can start to visualize the gradient of the function..

  • @lynsikeye3714
    @lynsikeye3714 6 років тому +1

    Thanks so much! This helped!

  • @umairalvi7382
    @umairalvi7382 4 роки тому +2

    What a great explanation.

  • @dilpreetsingh4199
    @dilpreetsingh4199 3 роки тому +2

    Thank u for making it so simple

  • @zubair1411
    @zubair1411 5 років тому +2

    Perfect explanation

  • @user-bz8nm6eb6g
    @user-bz8nm6eb6g 4 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @sols8-ee799
    @sols8-ee799 6 років тому +2

    Super cool video!

  • @edgbaston149
    @edgbaston149 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @rishitsrivastava2345
    @rishitsrivastava2345 3 роки тому +3

    Wow!! What an amazing explanation...!!!Gr8👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @dhruvgarg8113
    @dhruvgarg8113 3 роки тому +1

    Beautiful!!!!❤️❤️

  • @yougetchandan
    @yougetchandan 3 роки тому +2

    before watching this video i had never seen a graph in such a way

  • @raheelroy2448
    @raheelroy2448 3 роки тому +1

    Great job 👍👏🎉

  • @jyothishtr6460
    @jyothishtr6460 2 роки тому +4

    Is this 3blue1brown?

  • @MrBigmit37
    @MrBigmit37 7 років тому +7

    So the partial derivative only shows a change in Z because x or y,
    (depending on whose partial derivative you take) will be constant?

  • @jagsproduction
    @jagsproduction 3 роки тому +1

    You are awesome!♥️♥️♥️♥️🙏🙌🙌🙌🙌

  • @kisore20gp
    @kisore20gp 5 років тому

    Awesome

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 10 місяців тому +1

    Love the graph "slicing" ! 😂 🎉

  • @impogg5942
    @impogg5942 2 місяці тому

    you could have used small angle approx to denote the trig values

  • @mrmathsacademy3343
    @mrmathsacademy3343 7 років тому +2

    Very good editor you use there. I don't believe it is SmoothDraw 4? What program is this?

  • @zhenniqi136
    @zhenniqi136 7 місяців тому

    Can i say,wow!what a great job!

  • @rossholst5315
    @rossholst5315 5 місяців тому

    What about when you want to know what the shape is doing in a partial step in the x direction and a partial step in the y direction?

  • @arkapravamanna
    @arkapravamanna 3 роки тому

    Really best videos

  • @omarallam4548
    @omarallam4548 2 роки тому

    Great♥

  • @sandipansarkar9211
    @sandipansarkar9211 3 роки тому

    good explanation

  • @KK-rg3nj
    @KK-rg3nj 3 роки тому

    graphs are the best

  • @546mukulsharma8
    @546mukulsharma8 4 роки тому

    Good video

  • @suryanshkhatri5570
    @suryanshkhatri5570 Рік тому

    My mind was blown when I got to know that this is 3blue1brown

  • @AvielLivay
    @AvielLivay 5 років тому +1

    Beautiful!!

  • @aharonmalachi
    @aharonmalachi 5 років тому +5

    Why we are interested in 2 specific derivatives in specific directions (along the x and y axes) when we can ask about the derivative of other infinite directions? is it because it is easier to calculate? how can we calculate the derivative of other directions?

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 4 роки тому

      The different directions would be different parametrisations of the same graph, but lead to a different function.

    • @hel_0568
      @hel_0568 Рік тому

      It is easier to calculate in x and y directions as usually we are in euclidean space. We can surely calculate the derivative in any direction we want, for example by using polar coordinates here the parameters would be the angle theta and the radial direction in which we want to calculate, this is particularly useful when there is spherical symmetry, but it is really tedious

  • @joypalit6408
    @joypalit6408 3 роки тому

    what software did u use?

  • @PANKAJKUMAR-yc3jn
    @PANKAJKUMAR-yc3jn 5 років тому +1

    Thanks I did understand d concept. But how did u locate tat point(-1,1) to on graph?

  • @alibader910
    @alibader910 3 роки тому

    and what does fxx and fxy mean in geometry?

  • @telephonerock
    @telephonerock 8 років тому +2

    does anyone know what program they are using to draw? it doesnt look like the usual smoothdraw

    • @xynyde0
      @xynyde0 7 років тому

      its the grapher

  • @prajwaldeepkamble6617
    @prajwaldeepkamble6617 4 роки тому +1

    How to evaluate the derivative in any direction but not in direction of x or y axis

  • @turcugeorge5874
    @turcugeorge5874 8 років тому

    Thank you! Does anyone know what is this program? it looks really useful..

    • @ijarbis187
      @ijarbis187 5 років тому

      It’s called Grapher and its a default program on Mac computers made by apple

    • @baxi9227
      @baxi9227 5 років тому

      @@ijarbis187 No, its manim. An open source python library

  • @diaracing
    @diaracing 7 років тому +2

    The first graph in the video is like man body upside down

  • @mostafaEOY
    @mostafaEOY 7 років тому +7

    what is the name of the program used in 3d drawing ?

    • @mrmathsacademy3343
      @mrmathsacademy3343 7 років тому +1

      Interesting. I like to know too. I don't believe this is Smoothdraw 4.

    • @Ferddddi
      @Ferddddi 6 років тому +3

      Mac Grapher

  • @tmacchioni
    @tmacchioni 3 роки тому +1

    But it's Grant Sanderson of 3Blue1Brown! Isn't it?

  • @bennyblanco3322
    @bennyblanco3322 2 роки тому

    You sound like timothy sykes

  • @raheelroy2448
    @raheelroy2448 3 роки тому

    But sel Khan is best all the time ..

  • @aaa-battery316
    @aaa-battery316 5 років тому +8

    4:46
    x youre a constant!
    why?
    youre the variable!

  • @pradyu8335
    @pradyu8335 2 роки тому +1

    isnt this 2 variable input and 2 variable output? why does he call it 2 variable input and 1 variable output?

  • @saimeghana2261
    @saimeghana2261 7 років тому +2

    why is f(x,y) in 3D?

    • @arkapointer
      @arkapointer 7 років тому

      Sai Meghana f(x,y) isn't actually in 3d.
      The point is the inputs are ordered pairs(as opposed to usual functions from |R->|R)
      So the "graph" is made like this considering the input domain to be the whole of |R^2

    • @xoppa09
      @xoppa09 7 років тому +13

      f(x,y) is in three dimensions, if we graph it the standard way. Two dimensions for input (x,y) and a third dimension z where z = f(x,y) for output.

  • @High_Rate136
    @High_Rate136 5 місяців тому

    What doesn't make sense is if you use a pure graphical interpretation. What is stopping you from looking at the slope from the other direction and thinking what should be positive is actually negative?

  • @computeconnect3396
    @computeconnect3396 6 років тому

    Can you please tell me the plotting software used

    • @ijarbis187
      @ijarbis187 5 років тому

      It’s called grapher and its a default program on Mac computers made by apple and its only on Mac I’m pretty sure. It’s amazing I use it all the time.

    • @baxi9227
      @baxi9227 5 років тому

      @@ijarbis187 Its manim. He makes the program himself

  • @anaslamaiz2079
    @anaslamaiz2079 3 роки тому

    shouldn't the point (-1,1) be parallel to the (x,y) surface?

  • @CheesyHotDogPuff
    @CheesyHotDogPuff 8 років тому +4

    I have to do this shit in uni? Fuuuck

    • @tripp3468
      @tripp3468 7 років тому +9

      it's actually pretty interesting.

    • @deltagamma1442
      @deltagamma1442 7 років тому

      What you mean? There's alot of money involved in machine learning? Doesn't it reduce human labour?

    • @anonymoustraveller2254
      @anonymoustraveller2254 6 років тому

      Alpha Beta nah , people who work on machine learning gets more money , people who work for learned machines gets less money.

  • @anshul9856
    @anshul9856 4 роки тому +1

    LOVE YOU WHOEVER DISLIKED THIS MUST BE BLIND

  • @1paper1pen63
    @1paper1pen63 5 років тому +3

    Oh 3b1b.

  • @ahmedel-hindawi9226
    @ahmedel-hindawi9226 3 роки тому

    maaaaaaan

  • @KaziRifatMorshed_is_here
    @KaziRifatMorshed_is_here Рік тому

    I guess, Mr Grant Sanderson speaking 🙄

  • @zahrankhalil8209
    @zahrankhalil8209 8 років тому

    second !!

  • @pinkospace9040
    @pinkospace9040 5 років тому +1

    why is this a 3D graph? shouldn't it be 2D?

    • @xingyubian5654
      @xingyubian5654 5 років тому +4

      f(x,y) is a 3D graph because x and y are the input and f(x,y) is the output.

  • @prostatecancergaming9531
    @prostatecancergaming9531 2 роки тому

    I personally don’t believe in god but when I think of a person who does deeds Jesus would do i would think of grant

  • @yashdesai8372
    @yashdesai8372 5 років тому

    oversimplified