Honestly people made it out be to a lot harder then it is. Although if you went to be at the highest level of solving square1 you need to memorize so many algorithms more then 3x3
@@ThanMG honestly I’m not to sure it’s been 2 years seance I’ve cubed as an every day thing. I averaged 15 and new around 50 algs however if you want to be at the top level it’s prob above 500 lol 😂 the better you get at cubing the harder it gets to make the time go down one second. It takes people on 3x3 years to go from 7 second average to 6 second average. But you can get sub 20 in a couple months. On 3x3 I averaged 13 seconds and new above 190 algs for just 3x3. But square1 is becoming a lot more popular so there probably more resources to help you get better compared to when I leaned it. When I learned it a lot of time I’d have to make up my own algs. Which can actually be quite fun and fulfilling.
@@wrmmaglev6620you have to memorize cubeshape with diagrams rather than algorithms (it's not required it's just more efficient and practical), you can orient corners intuitively, edges requires 1 algorithm, one algorithm for permutation corners, one for edges, and one for parity. So in total about 4
Wow after 2 years I give an update, yea I just got a square-2 and this randomly came up and to reiterate, I only use 1 edge swapping algorithm in the end, parity algorithm, and J-perm Algorithm, that’s it.
Square 1 is the most boring event ever. Literally everything besides the first step is all algorithms. Your speed is determined almost completely by how many algs you're willing to learn
![Lp. Последняя Реальность #107 РОДНОЙ ДОМ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3QKzKUlHM/mqdefault.jpg)
That's how my math teacher teaches me math☠️
Me too but
me too
Exactly ! 😂
Square-1 is not a cube
- J perm
Is a square
Its not
Yes it is
A cube I mean
@@HighIQbing search it online, some square-1 are not cubes
Now I know exactly how to solve my square one . . .
Fun Fact: the Square-1 is the only WCA puzzle to shapeshift
yeah
Him after every step: "like that"
Dude, I can't even solve the square1, you are amazing!
Honestly people made it out be to a lot harder then it is. Although if you went to be at the highest level of solving square1 you need to memorize so many algorithms more then 3x3
@@nathanielrutkowski7599 yeah, but I know how to do it now, and I average abt 15 with co eo and 2 look pbl
@@heystopthatnow that’s really good! That’s about what I averaged when I was really into cubing
@@nathanielrutkowski7599 how many algs would have to know to be at an advanced level?
@@ThanMG honestly I’m not to sure it’s been 2 years seance I’ve cubed as an every day thing. I averaged 15 and new around 50 algs however if you want to be at the top level it’s prob above 500 lol 😂 the better you get at cubing the harder it gets to make the time go down one second. It takes people on 3x3 years to go from 7 second average to 6 second average. But you can get sub 20 in a couple months. On 3x3 I averaged 13 seconds and new above 190 algs for just 3x3. But square1 is becoming a lot more popular so there probably more resources to help you get better compared to when I leaned it. When I learned it a lot of time I’d have to make up my own algs. Which can actually be quite fun and fulfilling.
theres also parity which you can remove using cubeshape parity
You are so lucky that you had no parity
he had a parity…
@@pleasehelpmeiamdrowning9103 no he didnt...
There is an advanced square one method called CSP where you never get parity
@@cameroncook3907 im pretty sure he doesnt know csp
Me in square shape on square-1 be like: "Spams random turns hoping it will turn into a cube"
That parity algorithm always gets me on my sloves. Haven't solved one in a while hmm😅
Well done!!
I can solve the square 1 in 20 seconds but the way you sold it man I'm never going to get that fast oh my god you're good🤯
20 seconds is pretty good
wow 🔥
Dam thanks i was able to watch this and i totally inderstand how you solbe that now
I have a square 1 and I can solve it knowing only a couple of algorithms
I think you need like 5 to solve it
unscremble only 2 algorithama
@@wrmmaglev6620you have to memorize cubeshape with diagrams rather than algorithms (it's not required it's just more efficient and practical), you can orient corners intuitively, edges requires 1 algorithm, one algorithm for permutation corners, one for edges, and one for parity. So in total about 4
Wow after 2 years I give an update, yea I just got a square-2 and this randomly came up and to reiterate, I only use 1 edge swapping algorithm in the end, parity algorithm, and J-perm Algorithm, that’s it.
How many algorithms are there total? Like full CFOP has 78 total algorithms
Why is this oddly satisfying.
ni beru sooooooo cool beru!
just got a square 1 today! i hope i can solve it fast, i know the notation already 😅
Do you solve it and learn it also ?
@@wolfygamer4759 yeah! that was 8 months ago, i now have a 25 seconds pb on the sq-1!!!
(6,6)/(6,9)
@@brunodesyeuxomg 😱😱😱
Im still watching
Ooo so thats how easy it is
very food tutorial
⭐
"Like that" he said this 1 billion times in his videos
I am from Brazil🇧🇷
GG
Wow
How to draw an owl...
Method please
Do you know full cs
is that like roux?
0:01
What about parity?
what is this model of square-1?
Square 1 is the most boring event ever. Literally everything besides the first step is all algorithms. Your speed is determined almost completely by how many algs you're willing to learn
Asmr
Dude you used a 14 slice pbl that sucks you should do j/j to j/j and that’s only 8 slices bro
So easy💀💀
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Then I get parity and quit
How do u deal with parity? Do u plan in inspection or do it in PBL?
Inspection
@@BensonKim-Speedcuber cool
atse
Who asked how you solve it?
Perfert
I can solve it in 2.50m
Can anybody here tell me if this cube is hard
Yes
Never mind, it's actually really easy
you did it too fast