Illustrative examples for evaluation of bids based on different schemes

Illustrative examples for evaluation of bids based on different schemes
1. The translated content of this course is available in regional languages. For details please visit nptel.ac.in/tr...
The video course content can be accessed in the form of regional language text transcripts, books which can be accessed under downloads of each course, subtitles in the video and Video Text Track below the video.
Your feedback is highly appreciated. Kindly fill this form forms.gle/XFZh...
2. Regional language subtitles available for this course
To watch the subtitles in regional language:
1. Click on the lecture under Course Details.
2. Play the video.
3. Now click on the Settings icon and a list of features will display
4. From that select the option Subtitles/CC.
5. Now select the Language from the available languages to read the subtitle in the regional language.

[@seyberrick2250]

Superb presentation sir. I would be grateful to see more of your lectures on construction contracts and contract administration as well. I really enjoyed the lecture, thanks once again.

[@atulkumarkulshrestha1231]

Sir outstanding teaching.

[@ashrafelhassan5929]

Thanks for sharing

[@seyberrick2250]

Please what are the parameters or criteria for obtaining the financial and the technical scores? Please assist...

[@mamonaislam6646]

What a great content

[@suvodipsaha8166]

Thanks

[@sanjhalkanoujia8118]

How the financial scores have been calculated I am alienated.

[@govindbagariya9784]

very good

[@sandipghoshdastidar3406]

If any tender having two-part like main and optional item, and in the main part vendor A is L1 and in total i.e. main+optional vendor 2 is L1, then who is an actual vendor to be awarded PO. To decide L1, whether optional items price should be included?

[@muhanadk2910]

Very good query,, actually I am facing this dilemma now ,, the way out is to master the RFP from the beginning and put one templet for all bidders to include an optional scope of services in a separate financial and technical proposal and the overarching basic technical scope will be unified on all of the bidders. the optional scope should go beyond the required services … if the bidder is among the qualified group , the optional scope will be negotiated upon on face to face session.

[@arnab0711]

Sir,for evaluation we genarelly use the formula in case of "converting the quoated prices(financial bids)into 'marks' as 98/110*100 for bidder A is this wrong equation if so illustrate the equation used here 100-{110-98/98*100}

[@FranceTurkiye]

100 - (((110-98)/98)*100)

[@hasanuddin68]

weighting , exception review, multiple screening round

[@sagarkumarsahu174]

How their composite score comes...plz tell me...

[@iftikharali8646]

What is technical score and how is it calculated?

[@SantoshThapa-tq5qg]

The technical score is the summation of scores obtained by each bidder in different categories such as Experiences, Available manpower, equipment, turnover, etc. The full marks for each category are preset and specified in ITB. For instance, a highway project is to be constructed. The full marks can be set as 100 and marks of 40 for experiences, 25 for manpower, 25 for turnover, and 10 for equipment. The criteria for getting that marks are set objectively. A contractor having experience in a similar highway for more than 20 years can get 40 out of 40. But if he has only 10 years of experience he can get lower marks say 30 marks. The summation of marks obtained in each category can be added up to get the final Technical score. That's how the technical score is calculated.