Wiremock: because your microservice needs a buddy when you're testing by Rosanne Joosten

[@balazsklezli5702]

You could use something like a random value, which well sometimes you have good reason to use in a deterministic Mock [ at 27:17 ]
-- this was quite nice :)

[@vanluutran726]

The video is very great to start to use wire mock! Many loves

[@thotamounika5633]

Thank you Rosanne for a very clear Introduction :)

[@MrMakemusicmike]

So, if the real request and the stubbed request are exactly the same, you will get back your canned response?

[@deepanjansaha5343]

Thanks Rosanne, for the nice introduction to wiremock.

[@vipinkoul595]

Fake objects != Dummy objects, there are subtle differences, see here:
Dummy Objects:
Purpose: Dummy objects are passed around but never actually used. They are typically used to fill parameter lists.
Example: If a method requires an object as a parameter, you might pass a dummy object without caring about its actual content.
Fake Objects:
Purpose: Fake objects have working implementations, but they are simplified for testing purposes. They usually take shortcuts to make the tests run faster.
Example: Using an in-memory database as a fake for a real database in unit tests.

[@MikeStrong]

I need a same example whit POST (Wiremock) please help me

[@hooktest8101]

Nice talk , thank you

[@haoxu7066]

More video for learning,Pls

[@Kusuma343]

Thanks. It was good introduction!

[@brockastis]

such a cool presenter 😁👍

[@AjithkumarSekar]

great presentation

[@kranthikranthi7865]

this is the best demo!

[@Hersenman]

A bit late to the show, but anyway - thanks, nice demo!👍

[@BrockiProducts]

Thanks alot!

[@donwald3436]

Can you stop smacking your teeth it's so distracting.

[@st0a]

LOL

[@hruthikt-k3d]

Content wise okay but she is doing over over over overacting

[@sangvanho9385]

The first thing, you are beautiful 😊