Yeah the velocity is weird unless chronograph got wrong reading. You usually get that velocity from handloading or using a barrel longer than 6 inches.
I was going to ask the same. It's certainly in the realm of possibilities, but I'd like some confirmation before storing that data away in the brain case.
I have the same chronograph and sometimes it glitches to show higher velocity. I expect 1500 fps as UW advertised. 1700 fps is too much for the cartridge to handle, you'll see blow off primer, splitted brass at that much.
I would tend to agree. I barely got 1740fps. with UW 100grn. Extreme defenders. Forgot box velocity, but I have the same Rock Island Tac FS. Don't know how hot it is there( obviously Arizona is hot) but not hot enough to cause that much deviation.
No it isn't , my father's reloading manual from Hornady 'its is from the 90's , has load data pushing 1117 ft.lbs form a 6 inch barrel , that barrel isn't going to add that much energy . Remember 90 percent of the 10mm ammo and load data is for 10mm "FBI load" also known as half power . When they made the round and tested it , most police officers claimed the recoil was too much to handle and remember they were all carrying colt pythons and s&w 686's back then in .357 magnum .
My god, that is probably the most devastating 10mm round I have ever seen in a ballistic gel test. Definitely wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of one of those rounds. Great video dude.
Varmint hunting with the 5"? Wow those light bullets out of the 10mm are impressive. Your slow motion and still shots of bullet impacts are great. With the 5" you can see the table deflect and I'm glad it didn't break or your wife would be unhappy. Keep up your good work!
@@BloodAlwaysFindsItsLevel exactly My experience with underwood lately hasn’t been great. Another company watering down their rounds. 10mm isn’t even worth it really unless you hand load. Yeah Buffalo bore is decent and grizzly but those are 35-40$ for 20 rounds 🤡 I’ll stick with my glock 22 .40 Better bang for my buck. 165 grain gold dots or HST imo are hard to beat
1911 10mm Parachute bullet! That thing flattered out like bubblegum on the bottom of a shoe ! The FBI testing on the 10mm showed why they found it be the best round to adopt. And the glock was probably one of the better or best guns for it. I've got both a 10mm 1911 and 4 different glock 10mm's two 40's, a 21, and a 29! I ❤ the glock 29 test as it makes a great comparison testing!
@@ninjadave1970 Very cool, didn't know u were such a big 10mm fan, that's awesome!! I agree for sure, can't get enough of the G29. I'll keep the tests coming. Any rounds specifically u would like to see tested? As always I appreciate u taking the time to check this one out my friend!!
Dude, you’re making me lust after that Rock Island 1911 but I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I’m keeping my money in my pocket and not switching to 10mm! Excellent, thanks!
@@fanman8102 😄 Idk.... u might like it.. lol. It's definitely a sweet shooter, I love mine. Very accurate. But thank you my friend, always appreciate u taking the time to check it out!!
Good test, AZ! While I generally prefer that my bullets don't come apart much, these are pretty devastating! There was a decent amount of bullet that held together and penetrated well, so all is not lost. I will agree with Sanow & Marshall that bullets that leave fragments in tge wound track do nothing to enhance wounding, while those that exit the wound track at least have the potential for increased wounding. As these frags went out of the main wound channel, they are in the enhanced category, which is good. Not bad, all in all! Cheers, jc
I should do one of these videos. Most people doing them have 2-3 guns. I've got 7, soon to be 8. I'd check with a 3" GP100, 4.5" FN 510, 4" S&W 610, 5" DW Silverback, 6" SA TRP Operator, and 6.5" Blackhawk. I'm skipping the SA XDM10 as it doesn't have full chamber support. I'm getting a Ruger carbine next month. Should be an interesting test.
Outstanding results. Very impressive damage. Stills are very revealing. Did you get more velocities out of 5".? If you mentioned it I missed it. These wouldn't be my choice for woods carry but for personal protection I wouldn't hesitate to use them in any 10 on the market. Huge thanks. Well done.
@@guardianminifarm8005 Thank you my friend I really appreciate that!! And yes I did, surprisingly was averaging around that 1700fps mark with a 3 shot string. All the brass was fine, primers a lil flatter but still in the safe range. Forgot to throw in a clip of the numbers and brass. I will be doing a retest very soon with the same box and a new chronograph to see it we get any different results. Thank you again for taking the time to check it out, I appreciate ya!!
I'm sure my M&P 2.0 10mm performance center edition doesn't have the velocity as the full 5" barrel... But the porting makes it a very well controlled cannon. I don't usually shoot lighter loads, but the 200 grains certainly rip and tear something wicked.
How do you account for such a great increase in velocity over factory specs of 1500 fps? Do you know what the factory tested it out of, perhaps a G20? But even then, to go from 1500 to over 1700+ fps in just 0.40” barrel length from a G20 let’s say, to a 5” 1911 is a mystery?? I’m wondering if that round accidentally had a higher powder charge by mistake (which could be dangerous pressures)? Or if perhaps it was a chronograph error? Definitely higher velocity than the G29 with the 1911. Did you recover the brass to examine for flattened primers? I was hoping that you would have put some more rounds through the chronograph.
If that velocity is correct the energy is indeed 983 ft. lbs. which puts it right up with a .460 Rowland which has a larger case capacity, needs a compensator and a heavy recoil spring to slow the slide enough to pick up the next round in the magazine and not beat up the gun too much. I would be nervous shooting this cartridge if that is the actual velocity, the pressure is almost guaranteed to be higher than it is rated for.
I have to agree , seems off , as for the recoil spring , I have the opposite problem, my Rock island Tac ten came with a 28 pound spring , so the light loads give me fits
@@bobjones-bt9bh The highest I've seen the .460 Rowland advertised for in factory ammo is around 1,030 Ft. Lbs of energy and that is with a 185 grain bullet, the cartridges with the heavier bullets usually don't go above the 1,000 ft. lb. mark. Yes this is a bit lighter than 185 grains but is is still in the .460's energy range and well above any 10MM I've ever seen.
Out of the full size this Nosler looks like a Liberty Defense for grown-ups 😂. But the speed reading should be off. Almost 400 fps more with just 1.2” more barrel, unlikely. Should probably be 1500-1550
33% more barrel with a lighter for caliber round loaded hot. I almost don't doubt it. With more powerful handgun calibers you see a more dramatic increase in velocity than you would with lesser handgun calibers with longer barrels.
I think something is fishy too..i would expect that speed with a 100 or perhaps a 115 grain with a 6 inch barrel or even longer but not with a 150 grain
Strange 1350 fps out of basically a 4 inch barrel 150 fps short of advertised. Then add an inch and you got 1700 fps 200 fps faster than advertised? Did you test more rounds out of this box as you said you were going to and find out what the true velocity was?
Uuuuh yeah, dude, if you're actually getting 1000 ft lbs out of a 10mm pistol, you need to get ahold of Underwood and let them know they're selling some massively overpressured ammo.
If it was really going 1,718 FPS he is correct on that energy of 983. Could be a false reading I would like to see more rounds chronographed to verify it though.
Underwood ammo are my go to 10mm ammos
My EDC round for the last few years. I have carried a 10mm for over 25 years with no regrets.
Thanks for all the 10mm vids
@@iplaypaintballalot Absolutely, I have a ton coming this season. I appreciate u taking the time to check em out!!
Wow! 983 foot pounds! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
That’s not real guy.
What was the off camera velocity? 1700 doesn’t seem right..
Yeah looked milder than that
Yeah the velocity is weird unless chronograph got wrong reading. You usually get that velocity from handloading or using a barrel longer than 6 inches.
Awesome video I always loved the 10 mm
That 1700fps was 100% a chronograph error. If it wasnt a chronograph error, then this ammo is completely unsafe to shoot.
An error. The muzzle flip looked mild. It also sounded kinda normal.
Did u shoot more to comfirm fps speeds. Seems like a glitch
I was going to ask the same. It's certainly in the realm of possibilities, but I'd like some confirmation before storing that data away in the brain case.
I’d like to know this myself
It is obviously an error. The muzzle flip looked mild.
By the looks of that block on the second shot that cavity is enormous.
Another superb video. What a jump in velocities between the subcompact and fullsize platforms!
@@snowdogthewolf Thank you my friend, I appreciate u taking the time to check it out!! Plenty on the way😁👍.
Interesting to see that round from a carbine length barrel, 12" to 16". Maybe a definite 1000 ft./lbs. which is the M1 carbine energy.
best ammo test channel on YT now
I have the same chronograph and sometimes it glitches to show higher velocity. I expect 1500 fps as UW advertised. 1700 fps is too much for the cartridge to handle, you'll see blow off primer, splitted brass at that much.
I would tend to agree. I barely got 1740fps. with UW 100grn. Extreme defenders. Forgot box velocity, but I have the same Rock Island Tac FS.
Don't know how hot it is there( obviously Arizona is hot) but not hot enough to cause that much deviation.
Yes it's an error. Muzzle flip looked mild
If the crimp is loose the bullet can set back hitting the feed ramp drastically spiking pressure.
No it isn't , my father's reloading manual from Hornady 'its is from the 90's , has load data pushing 1117 ft.lbs form a 6 inch barrel , that barrel isn't going to add that much energy . Remember 90 percent of the 10mm ammo and load data is for 10mm "FBI load" also known as half power . When they made the round and tested it , most police officers claimed the recoil was too much to handle and remember they were all carrying colt pythons and s&w 686's back then in .357 magnum .
@@jessieyoung3759Underwood doesn't load their stuff down usually
Powerful round! I love the way you gel test with cloth to simulate real-world clothing, which I'm sure makes the hollow point open more realistically.
Good test AZ. I've got to try these in my LC 10 carbine. 💥💥💥👍🇺🇸
@@GreyShooter Thank you my friend!! 💪💯 I would like to see that too 😯 would be insane💣💥.
My god, that is probably the most devastating 10mm round I have ever seen in a ballistic gel test. Definitely wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of one of those rounds. Great video dude.
Varmint hunting with the 5"? Wow those light bullets out of the 10mm are impressive. Your slow motion and still shots of bullet impacts are great. With the 5" you can see the table deflect and I'm glad it didn't break or your wife would be unhappy. Keep up your good work!
Great video. I enjoy seeing test done in regular ass gel rather than clear gel. The displayed velocity and energy is also very nice
Wow! Amazing energy! I need to get into 10mm!
Thanks for this I bought a bunch from underwood on a sale. Now I know it was a good buy
10mm aint no joke👊💥
@@Disastrous.Affect 💪💯💣💥 I appreciate u taking the time to check it out!!
So was the 1911 speed legit? For the extra barrel length seems the numbers don’t add up but I could be wrong
I thought maybe I missed the results of him confirming that velocity reading until I saw your comment. I would guess it was one over pressured round.
@@MidWesternShootingEnthusiast that’s my guess because the numbers don’t add up 👍🏼
Has to be an error. Sounded mild and looked mild
@@BloodAlwaysFindsItsLevel exactly
My experience with underwood lately hasn’t been great. Another company watering down their rounds. 10mm isn’t even worth it really unless you hand load. Yeah Buffalo bore is decent and grizzly but those are 35-40$ for 20 rounds 🤡 I’ll stick with my glock 22 .40
Better bang for my buck. 165 grain gold dots or HST imo are hard to beat
To the point and right into the demonstration. Great delivery. Very informative !!
@@paulhomsy2751 Thank you very much I appreciate that!! Glad u enjoyed it. Plenty on the way my friend😁👍.
Incredible. More energy than a .30 carbine.
1911 10mm Parachute bullet! That thing flattered out like bubblegum on the bottom of a shoe ! The FBI testing on the 10mm showed why they found it be the best round to adopt. And the glock was probably one of the better or best guns for it. I've got both a 10mm 1911 and 4 different glock 10mm's two 40's, a 21, and a 29! I ❤ the glock 29 test as it makes a great comparison testing!
@@ninjadave1970 Very cool, didn't know u were such a big 10mm fan, that's awesome!! I agree for sure, can't get enough of the G29. I'll keep the tests coming. Any rounds specifically u would like to see tested? As always I appreciate u taking the time to check this one out my friend!!
Dude, you’re making me lust after that Rock Island 1911 but I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I’m keeping my money in my pocket and not switching to 10mm! Excellent, thanks!
@@fanman8102 😄 Idk.... u might like it.. lol. It's definitely a sweet shooter, I love mine. Very accurate. But thank you my friend, always appreciate u taking the time to check it out!!
Good test, AZ! While I generally prefer that my bullets don't come apart much, these are pretty devastating! There was a decent amount of bullet that held together and penetrated well, so all is not lost. I will agree with Sanow & Marshall that bullets that leave fragments in tge wound track do nothing to enhance wounding, while those that exit the wound track at least have the potential for increased wounding. As these frags went out of the main wound channel, they are in the enhanced category, which is good. Not bad, all in all!
Cheers,
jc
@@jmichaelcarbonniere9549 Thank you my friend, always appreciate u taking the time to check em out.
Very impressive power. Great video.
I should do one of these videos. Most people doing them have 2-3 guns. I've got 7, soon to be 8. I'd check with a 3" GP100, 4.5" FN 510, 4" S&W 610, 5" DW Silverback, 6" SA TRP Operator, and 6.5" Blackhawk. I'm skipping the SA XDM10 as it doesn't have full chamber support. I'm getting a Ruger carbine next month. Should be an interesting test.
Outstanding results. Very impressive damage. Stills are very revealing. Did you get more velocities out of 5".? If you mentioned it I missed it. These wouldn't be my choice for woods carry but for personal protection I wouldn't hesitate to use them in any 10 on the market. Huge thanks. Well done.
@@guardianminifarm8005 Thank you my friend I really appreciate that!! And yes I did, surprisingly was averaging around that 1700fps mark with a 3 shot string. All the brass was fine, primers a lil flatter but still in the safe range. Forgot to throw in a clip of the numbers and brass. I will be doing a retest very soon with the same box and a new chronograph to see it we get any different results. Thank you again for taking the time to check it out, I appreciate ya!!
3:39 shot of the year.
That´s totally brute force man...that impact nearly look like a .300blk !!!
Yes I'm sorry that velocity is wrong come on the Rock Island
Come on brother you know better than that 1700 ft per second from 150 grain Nosler out of 10 mm
Corbon makes a monster of a round with the 130gr @ 1650FPS. Would you consider testing some?
We will assume you meant Underwood.....right?
@@SuspiciousGanymede Absolutely, if I can get a hold of some I will definitely put a test up. Thank you for the heads up, I'll keep an eye out.
I'm sure my M&P 2.0 10mm performance center edition doesn't have the velocity as the full 5" barrel... But the porting makes it a very well controlled cannon. I don't usually shoot lighter loads, but the 200 grains certainly rip and tear something wicked.
Thanks
Wicked!
nice comparison
@@richki.24 Thanks buddy I appreciate ya!!
All right...
about right.
Crazy. Insane.
How do you account for such a great increase in velocity over factory specs of 1500 fps? Do you know what the factory tested it out of, perhaps a G20? But even then, to go from 1500 to over 1700+ fps in just 0.40” barrel length from a G20 let’s say, to a 5” 1911 is a mystery?? I’m wondering if that round accidentally had a higher powder charge by mistake (which could be dangerous pressures)? Or if perhaps it was a chronograph error? Definitely higher velocity than the G29 with the 1911. Did you recover the brass to examine for flattened primers? I was hoping that you would have put some more rounds through the chronograph.
It's not correct. Something is wrong. You can tell by the recoil it looked mild
That is probably the most fpe I’ve seen from 10mm.
If that velocity is correct the energy is indeed 983 ft. lbs. which puts it right up with a .460 Rowland which has a larger case capacity, needs a compensator and a heavy recoil spring to slow the slide enough to pick up the next round in the magazine and not beat up the gun too much. I would be nervous shooting this cartridge if that is the actual velocity, the pressure is almost guaranteed to be higher than it is rated for.
I have to agree , seems off , as for the recoil spring , I have the opposite problem, my Rock island Tac ten came with a 28 pound spring , so the light loads give me fits
uh....you understand that this was only 150gr, right? The .460 is pushing that energy in a MUCH heavier bullet
@@bobjones-bt9bh The highest I've seen the .460 Rowland advertised for in factory ammo is around 1,030 Ft. Lbs of energy and that is with a 185 grain bullet, the cartridges with the heavier bullets usually don't go above the 1,000 ft. lb. mark. Yes this is a bit lighter than 185 grains but is is still in the .460's energy range and well above any 10MM I've ever seen.
Out of the full size this Nosler looks like a Liberty Defense for grown-ups 😂. But the speed reading should be off. Almost 400 fps more with just 1.2” more barrel, unlikely. Should probably be 1500-1550
33% more barrel with a lighter for caliber round loaded hot. I almost don't doubt it.
With more powerful handgun calibers you see a more dramatic increase in velocity than you would with lesser handgun calibers with longer barrels.
I think something is fishy too..i would expect that speed with a 100 or perhaps a 115 grain with a 6 inch barrel or even longer but not with a 150 grain
Please do 357 magnum vs 10mm.
@@anonymousf454 Already have quite a few up but can certainly do more. Thanks for watching!!
@AzAirgunner. Thank you Sir. Would love to see some Buffalo Bore
It’s a hard round for self defense to beat. It’s not my go to for bear woods though.
RBCD did make +1000ft/lb 10mm ammo apparently... Quite the anomaly. Doubt these results though.
And now I'm shopping for a 10mm! LOL
...nice
982 pounds of energy from a 10mm sounds as if the round was handloaded. This is insane supposedly coming from a factory load
Compare the 155gr. XTP in a deer, and you’ll see the gel does not entirely portray the capability of the 10mm.
Meaning it does more or less damage?
Strange 1350 fps out of basically a 4 inch barrel 150 fps short of advertised. Then add an inch and you got 1700 fps 200 fps faster than advertised? Did you test more rounds out of this box as you said you were going to and find out what the true velocity was?
Uuuuh yeah, dude, if you're actually getting 1000 ft lbs out of a 10mm pistol, you need to get ahold of Underwood and let them know they're selling some massively overpressured ammo.
🤫
Lmfao, no not even remotely true. Modern powders are amazing
Come your test 200 gr xtp 10mm by underwood
@@l-lljrll-l6090 I absolutely can and will. Should have it up soon for ya😁👍. I appreciate u taking the time to check this one out!!
I’m, fairly, sure that 10mm would make a mess. 😂
@@skoodercrunch2821 😄💪💯💣💥
Too bad the numbers don’t add up
Would not be surprised if it was 760 ft lbs plus
If it was really going 1,718 FPS he is correct on that energy of 983. Could be a false reading I would like to see more rounds chronographed to verify it though.
I have a 45 I do not need a 10mm. I have to keep telling myself that.
Chrono error for sure.
Shouldnt be any more than 800-830ft lbs otherwise its dangerous! And thats out of no less than 5' barrel
my 380acp calibers hit harder ... lol
@@richki.24 😂💪💯💥💣
@@AzAirgunner. , don't you dare make fun of my super powered 380acp rounds ....lol
Your numbers are incorrect.
LOL. What a load of BS.
@@albundy06 Thanks for watching!!
The best MM 💪🏻