How Did Genesis Know That?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13 тис.

  • @CosmicSkeptic
    @CosmicSkeptic  8 місяців тому +1295

    Full debate available now on Pangburn Philosophy’s UA-cam channel!

    • @RinZ3993
      @RinZ3993 8 місяців тому +73

      This debate is a goldmine for shorts.. Dinesh doesn't need more than 30 seconds to sound stupid

    • @VeridicusMaximus
      @VeridicusMaximus 8 місяців тому +36

      Funny thing is that Genesis does not say that the Universe had a beginning. It actually teaches creatio ex materia and God taking that material and giving it form and function - basically order from chaos!

    • @djksan1
      @djksan1 8 місяців тому +5

      Wait, Pangburn is still around?? They screwed so many people over back in 2018 with the event that never happened in NYC. Myself included.

    • @bengreen171
      @bengreen171 8 місяців тому +16

      I wish you'd been this scathing with Peterson.

    • @bignenny
      @bignenny 8 місяців тому +2

      Working with criminals and frauds. You must be desperate for that cash Alex

  • @j0b01231
    @j0b01231 8 місяців тому +21672

    ‘You can’t now move the goalposts, especially if you’re still going to miss’
    Now THAT was a Hitchslap if ever I’ve heard one.

    • @jaffaarmy
      @jaffaarmy 8 місяців тому +509

      I think he’s on his way to become more infamous than the great hitch, he is. Mid 20s and is debating the same people

    • @stevenl378
      @stevenl378 8 місяців тому +2

      Get hitch slapped 😂😂😂

    • @cg1906
      @cg1906 8 місяців тому +94

      Do we still need to carry the idol of Hitchens hero worship around?

    • @ZombieLover84
      @ZombieLover84 8 місяців тому +474

      @@cg1906 Yes. He was incredibly important to the public discourse in these areas.

    • @stevenl378
      @stevenl378 8 місяців тому +41

      @@ZombieLover84 💪

  • @eddymuigai3909
    @eddymuigai3909 8 місяців тому +10833

    This debate was a public execution

    • @Xulios16
      @Xulios16 7 місяців тому +93

      Not really. He said the scientific method
      reveals his belief. The only issue is that the scientific method requires observation and must be repeatable and since no one has observed it this is not scientific.😮

    • @RaphaelBraun
      @RaphaelBraun 7 місяців тому +335

      ​@@Xulios16No, the scientific method requires evidence, not direct observation. Besides, this is not the point of the comment. The comment intended to say, that the person thought that Alex was the clear winner in the debate !!!in their opinion!!!. If you check the comments underneath the original debate you will find a lot of comments which use very strong language to express how much Alex won this debate. They write about "massacre", "genocide", "murder", "slaughter", "destroy". Note that those are attempts to make clear that Alex not just won in their opinion, but won in such a convincing way, that just stating "Alex won" sounds like an understatement.
      It's totally fine if you don't share that opinion.

    • @eddymuigai3909
      @eddymuigai3909 7 місяців тому +38

      @@Xulios16 I once heard Brian Cox say something on a JRE episode in the lines of 'If you can't measure something, it does not exist'
      The scientific method doesn't always provide observable evidence but as long as you can measure it, you can prove it

    • @Xulios16
      @Xulios16 7 місяців тому +26

      @@eddymuigai3909 Yeah I think that's a logically false statement. One cannot measure love or measure consciousness etc etc. But it is as real as the air you breathe.

    • @xenon3633
      @xenon3633 7 місяців тому +28

      @@Xulios16 I think that the Earth is "real" in a different way than love or by extension consciousness is "real" though. Yeah, consciousness is real, but is it a real tangible thing, or simply chemical reactions in the brain that we can measure. Of course it's more than the sum of its parts, which makes it the greatest mystery to modern biology, but it's certainly intangible, though real. In the same way God is intangible, making it impossible to prove or disprove, however there is a little less than an infinite amount more evidence for consciousness "existing" than god. Really difficult to discuss such things over text, but you've brought up a super interesting point about the very concept of existence (tangible and intangible) itself.

  • @zcobryant
    @zcobryant 6 місяців тому +5190

    “You can’t move the goalposts, especially if you’re still going to miss.” Is one of the best zingers I’ve ever heard.

    • @michaeltaylor981
      @michaeltaylor981 5 місяців тому +18

      Read Job 38:9, go back and read the creation account, and do it all with the understanding that the framework has God hovering over the Earth. Lastly, when it says he “made the sun, moon, stars” it is in a complete verb form in Hebrew which means it is not stating at what point before that moment he made them. If you want to disbelieve, Satan will make it very easy. If you want the TRUTH, seek and ye shall find. You cannot grasp truth in subjects as complex as God by scratching at the surface and thinking well enough.

    • @zcobryant
      @zcobryant 5 місяців тому

      ⁠​⁠@@michaeltaylor981 “read the religious text that I believe, and make sure you frame it up just the right way so that it makes sense.”
      Nah man. I appreciate the offer but I’m good. If you wanna believe that book, have at it!

    • @kadencoates8774
      @kadencoates8774 5 місяців тому +65

      @@michaeltaylor981 "If you want to disbelieve, Satan will make it very easy. If you want the TRUTH, seek and ye shall find." Christians always say this, but I've been seeking god's truth for decades and haven't found anything.

    • @PatrickManser
      @PatrickManser 5 місяців тому

      ​@@kadencoates8774 seek harder. If you don't find him, you haven't looked hard enough. ObViOuSlY. /s

    • @HereComesThe-Sun
      @HereComesThe-Sun 5 місяців тому +30

      Doesn't Satan being able to manipulate our minds kinda take away from our free will/decision to believe

  • @SteveSines-p3c
    @SteveSines-p3c 21 день тому +317

    Face it Alex, you wiped the floor with him, he cannot recover. 😂

  • @7hundred_7ty7
    @7hundred_7ty7 2 місяці тому +972

    That awkward silence actually killed me 😂

    • @Greatwhiteconservative
      @Greatwhiteconservative Місяць тому +3

      Dude he David edited out his answer to make it look like Dinesh choked he didn't he tore his butt up before the edits he edited out almost all Dinesh is answers so it's smoke and mirrors

    • @thebirdfromtwitter1249
      @thebirdfromtwitter1249 Місяць тому +29

      @@Greatwhiteconservativewhat are you even talking about you can literally go to the actual thing and see nothing was edited out, just the silence to make it quicker

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 Місяць тому

      ​@@Greatwhiteconservative tore his butt up - with what? A wet flannel?

    • @jcenglish9711
      @jcenglish9711 Місяць тому +4

      It’s called thinking before speaking.

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 Місяць тому +12

      @@jcenglish9711 no, that's the cognitive dissonance operating in real-time.

  • @riskybiscuits688
    @riskybiscuits688 8 місяців тому +3244

    That was the most beautiful example of hoisting on your own petard I've ever seen. Bravo Alex for not letting him get out of his corner while not being a jerk about it.

    • @TheFPSCameron
      @TheFPSCameron 8 місяців тому +73

      Dinesh did look really petarded in this whole thing, yeah

    • @dirkmoras
      @dirkmoras 8 місяців тому +18

      I'm Dutch and I translated "hoisting on your own pretard" and I love it.

    • @riskybiscuits688
      @riskybiscuits688 8 місяців тому +2

      @@dirkmoras 🤣

    • @emailvonsour
      @emailvonsour 8 місяців тому +2

      Good job butchering Shakespeare.

    • @sirnunez7923
      @sirnunez7923 8 місяців тому

      What do you mean idiot , Alex is fkn stupid. Hahaha as are you. You aren’t able to read and comprehend hahahahah

  • @FuneFox
    @FuneFox 8 місяців тому +4811

    "The bible got this right"
    "But it also got this wrong"
    "Well it's not a science book"
    EDIT: This comment must've struck a lot of nerves because I'm still getting notifications from it.

    • @The_Orphanizer
      @The_Orphanizer 8 місяців тому +417

      "it just described a process!" Well, it describes the process incorrectly.

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 8 місяців тому +16

      ​@@The_OrphanizerWhat would you say to the argument that it's supposed to be Metaphorical?

    • @The_Orphanizer
      @The_Orphanizer 8 місяців тому +310

      @@m-ox2tx i would ask: "was it always assumed to be metaphorical, or did that interpretation conveniently rise to prominence after the development of the scientific revolution?"

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 8 місяців тому +23

      @@The_Orphanizer Not necessarily, or else that would position most interpretations of the Bible as literal before a certain point which would be taking the argument as it's most undesirable angle.
      Certain stories are obviously meant to be metaphorical in nature, so the idea then becomes how much of the Bible can be looked at as metaphorical as a valid interpretation.
      Which is why the Bible can neither condone or condemn anything, not only because of its heavily contradictory nature but because of how one Christian may look at it when compared to another Christian.

    • @flanderg123
      @flanderg123 8 місяців тому +13

      When I use a metaphor crutch, I prefer a splintered reed.

  • @landonp4726
    @landonp4726 22 дні тому +13

    “How did the writers of genesis know it had a beginning?” Wow such a bold prediction of those writers to guess that if something exists, then it had a beginning…

    • @nitramreniar
      @nitramreniar 10 годин тому +2

      Also creation myths aren't uncommon among various cultures, so how did all of those other cultures with entirely different stories about HOW it happend, "know" that some kind of beginning did happen...?

  • @treyforest1999
    @treyforest1999 7 місяців тому +1663

    "How did the writers of Genesis know the universe had a beginning?" It either did or it didn't. That's a 50/50 guess

    • @SaHaRaSquad
      @SaHaRaSquad 7 місяців тому +221

      And for a human something infinite isn't even comprehensible, so they'll always make the guess that makes more sense to them.

    • @rsr6193
      @rsr6193 6 місяців тому +16

      Exactly 😂

    • @captainblackthumb
      @captainblackthumb 6 місяців тому +5

      Yeah!!! Shrodingers CAT!! LOL

    • @PromptedHawk
      @PromptedHawk 6 місяців тому +49

      You forget the best thing - it's actually a 100/0 guess because it plays both sides:
      The universe was created from nothing by god at genesis - beginning
      genesis 1 describes that there were waters and all that so that's existing material that god shaped into the world - no beginning, was always there, just like god
      Which interpretation? Depends on who you're arguing with, and if they're enough of a weasel it also depends on what the point in discussion is.

    • @YourWrongImRight933
      @YourWrongImRight933 6 місяців тому +3

      Why does the Bible mention Jerusalem so much? Why is Israel currently under siege? Who predicted this?

  • @markhaunert5029
    @markhaunert5029 8 місяців тому +1813

    Dinesh is creating more atheist than Alex is.

    • @ene5520
      @ene5520 7 місяців тому +19

      😂😂😂

    • @1193bobmcc
      @1193bobmcc 7 місяців тому +6

      Lmao!!

    • @Handlethis342
      @Handlethis342 7 місяців тому +12

      Comment of the week!

    • @AlanXEverfrost
      @AlanXEverfrost 7 місяців тому +41

      It's a team effort. Dinesh sets himself up, Alex knocks him down, Dinesh stumbles and does that funny dance-in-the-air thing cartoons do as they scramble to try and stay up before falling a humiliatingly long way down.

    • @markhaunert5029
      @markhaunert5029 7 місяців тому +1

      @AlanXEverfrost Ha good point. That's what happens when you put the best in their field up against the worst in theirs.

  • @kreaturen
    @kreaturen 6 місяців тому +1158

    "How did the authors of Genesis know that?!" Good grief, imagining "a beginning" is the most intuitive thing in the world.

    • @sandroelbers
      @sandroelbers 5 місяців тому +41

      and yet an unfounded and unwarranted conclusion.

    • @KevinMannix-sf5zk
      @KevinMannix-sf5zk 5 місяців тому +11

      @@sandroelbers "you cant see past the end of your nose"
      interpret that :)
      you as they say are a "literal fool"

    • @yt.personal.identification
      @yt.personal.identification 5 місяців тому +65

      Every story needs a beginning.
      Going with a strong opener is a great literary technique.

    • @mbrum3230
      @mbrum3230 5 місяців тому +8

      ​@@sandroelbers agreed. For example if there was ever absolutely nothing how would that condition ever change?

    • @KevinMannix-sf5zk
      @KevinMannix-sf5zk 5 місяців тому

      @@CraigScottFrost Well seeing as we are the only sound focused creature on earth, then I guess saying the grower of all things does SPEAK to us all , in our sound brain created delusion
      P.S only one of our 7 brains focuses on sound, and we can over associate with that noise and pretend the rest of us does not exist , like instead of 7 gods we have the one god otherwise known as the LEFT PFC
      Notice that ? created in 7 days, you have 7 brains, its all encoded

  • @Aaronsl-202
    @Aaronsl-202 29 днів тому +24

    BRILLIANT!!! I’ve been watching all of your videos as I recently discovered your channel, and you are brilliant and articulate. Keep it up!

  • @rocklee169
    @rocklee169 7 місяців тому +4473

    “Well in context we don’t know what day means”
    *”yeah but day 4 definitely comes after day 1”*
    😂😂

    • @ASTRO-R3
      @ASTRO-R3 7 місяців тому +187

      Well, if it’s that ambiguous, then it’s not worth reading.
      How people think the Bible is a book to be followed when everything can be so skewed by personal interpretation is bonkers.
      Oh ya a God wrote this book 🤪 clearly ancient Middle Easter tribal males wrote the book.

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 7 місяців тому

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

    • @Mewse1203
      @Mewse1203 7 місяців тому +111

      "Yeah but it means epoch or eras"
      "Ok, that's much worse"
      😂😂
      Dinesh walked right into up to a tar pit and Alex pushed him in with a breath.

    • @waxwaine
      @waxwaine 7 місяців тому +11

      1 to 7 is a priority order of creations to receive MEN, not a sequence. First, you build the house and last you put people inside

    • @Mewse1203
      @Mewse1203 7 місяців тому +51

      @@waxwaine cool apologetics

  • @paulrawlinson8653
    @paulrawlinson8653 8 місяців тому +713

    D'Souza's level of argument is pretty embarrassing

    • @sirwojenheimthethird2268
      @sirwojenheimthethird2268 7 місяців тому +16

      It’s right on par with the hack that he is.

    • @joshuataylor3550
      @joshuataylor3550 7 місяців тому +13

      It's not his fault if he's defending the bible

    • @hewasfuzzywuzzy3583
      @hewasfuzzywuzzy3583 7 місяців тому +7

      He's not really even arguing though. He just brushes it aside or moves the goal post whenever he can't handle his way of thinking or interpreting is challenged.

    • @shacktime
      @shacktime 7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah, but I think it’s equally embarrassing to assert that the universe had a beginning. Sure, we don’t have evidence of what preceded this “beginning,” and science is loathe to proclaim things without evidence, but something was definitely always and infinitely there.
      I see the universe more as a container of sorts that holds properties of various types in perpetual states of flux. When one area of the universe is expanding another is contracting. Where a seeming void exists in one area of the universe another area is teeming with activity.

    • @mickquigley3083
      @mickquigley3083 7 місяців тому

      Yes. He should just tell the other guy he is an idiot like all our science that is buffoonarism to say the least

  • @ga6589
    @ga6589 8 місяців тому +262

    Alex, I'm an old woman and have to say that I have learned a great deal from you. I so admire your ability to keep your cool and present your arguments with stunning reason and intellect. Bravo!

    • @AtriadGamasekav
      @AtriadGamasekav 7 місяців тому +7

      Come on you can’t be that old ))) I like Alex too. As a matter of fact I was using his videos to learn English way back in a days when he was a kid and younger version of him was not as witty as he is today but surely super intelligent and well versed and listening to him helped to make learning routine more enjoyable.

    • @antygona-iq8ew
      @antygona-iq8ew 7 місяців тому +5

      Alex seems to have a lot of female fans. I will check his earlier videos.
      I certainly would like to improve my English.

    • @ga6589
      @ga6589 7 місяців тому +10

      @@AtriadGamasekav I've got fillings in my teeth way older than Alex. Let's just say I was born the year, "Mr. Sandman" and "Shake Rattle and Roll" were top hits in the US.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому +5

      He relies on skepticism, semantics, twisted logic, fallacies, and verbal shell games.

    • @AtriadGamasekav
      @AtriadGamasekav 7 місяців тому +4

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue oh yeah? Logic can’t be twisted it either is or it’s not. So could you please demonstrate where his statements lacked logic?

  • @VerochkaEltz
    @VerochkaEltz 12 днів тому +5

    The Bible is one of the best examples of a horrendous collection of books to read for actual facts about reality.

  • @BMCKINN7
    @BMCKINN7 7 місяців тому +1070

    Man got cooked in this debate. Completely embarrassed himself

    • @chadalpha7983
      @chadalpha7983 7 місяців тому +46

      Dinesh feels no shame, he's a sociopathic huckster

    • @feonor26
      @feonor26 7 місяців тому +12

      He obviously learned nothing from being slapped by the Hitch either when he was alive.

    • @matthewrhee8242
      @matthewrhee8242 7 місяців тому

      If one's interpretation of the book of truth counters that one's interpretation of the book of nature, then one's interpretation(s) of one or both must be wrong. Hypothesis: the Bible is the Book of Truth; and nature is truthful.

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 7 місяців тому

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

    • @davidspencer343
      @davidspencer343 7 місяців тому +12

      ​@matthewrhee8242 that's making fun of someone who believes that right? Like that isn't actually your take its satire?

  • @christophernye1970
    @christophernye1970 3 місяці тому +514

    "All right....so..so..so..so"😂

    • @brianross7454
      @brianross7454 2 місяці тому +5

      So so so so YES! 😂

    • @rolosilver3256
      @rolosilver3256 Місяць тому +4

      Mohammed Hijab: "Why are you stuttering?"

    • @dezeefresh5257
      @dezeefresh5257 Місяць тому

      Let There b Lght spoken by GOD Dnt mean it wz d Sun which d Earth circles.

    • @Th3Snipe
      @Th3Snipe Місяць тому +1

      @@dezeefresh5257 wrf was that incoherent rambling

    • @Revolvercon
      @Revolvercon Місяць тому

      A sun cannot be formed without space dust (earth).. so so so

  • @itsmederek1
    @itsmederek1 4 місяці тому +213

    That final comment was a death blow. It not only showed that the guy was wrong but also that the critic was listening intently to what he was saying. Masterpiece

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 2 місяці тому

      Not believing in god won’t save you from his judgement!

    • @itsmederek1
      @itsmederek1 2 місяці тому +5

      @@jbjb3907 If you truly believe that there is no point telling me lol

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 2 місяці тому +2

      @@itsmederek1If God exists and his name is Jesus, that’s the best news of all! Jesus command of the spread the truth.
      Make disciples of all nations:
      In Matthew 28:18-20, Jesus gives the Great Commission, which includes making disciples of all nations.
      Proclaim the gospel:
      In Mark 16:15, Jesus says, "Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation"

    • @itsmederek1
      @itsmederek1 2 місяці тому +2

      @@jbjb3907 Yuck

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 2 місяці тому

      @@itsmederek1 You do have free will… just remember that if God exist that means there are demons. You must ask yourself are you being influenced by a demon?

  • @spacetasticadi6103
    @spacetasticadi6103 20 днів тому +4

    How do you not smirk after such good counters😂😂

  • @Anglomachian
    @Anglomachian 8 місяців тому +1070

    “How did primitive shepherds know that the universe had a beginning?”
    They didn’t. They guessed.

    • @MrThatguy333
      @MrThatguy333 8 місяців тому +141

      50/50 shot, also it's hard to imagine something not having a beginning. That's why God's in almost all religions have a beginning, few Religions imagine a God that exists without a beginning.

    • @Anglomachian
      @Anglomachian 8 місяців тому +32

      @@MrThatguy333 very true. Earlier iterations if the Abrahamic god have a beginning before it’s current timeless spaceless flavour

    • @hayskig1226
      @hayskig1226 8 місяців тому +33

      The universe to them was 5 planets the earth, moon and the sun. The stars were holes in the sky with the light of heaven shining through them.

    • @VenusFeuerFalle
      @VenusFeuerFalle 8 місяців тому +2

      and even more funny, we might be wrong about it all along xD

    • @donsample1002
      @donsample1002 8 місяців тому +22

      And Hebrew scholars generally consider versions of the bible with “In the beginning God created…” to be a bad translation. The first phase should be more like “When God began to create…” and have him working from pre-existing materials.

  • @3_14pie
    @3_14pie 7 місяців тому +735

    "so why they got that bit wrong?"
    "..."
    "..."
    "... alright, so.."
    that pause lmao

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +4

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @drrickmarshall1191
      @drrickmarshall1191 7 місяців тому +18

      ​@@maambomumba6123If you can't see the source of light, you're not going to see the light at all.

    • @davebowman760
      @davebowman760 7 місяців тому +31

      @@maambomumba6123 before the Sun was formed, there was no Earth to be standing on for any observer. Also, the text doesn't mention that at all (because of course, its author was unaware of all of this), so that's a wide interpretation based on nothing.

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +5

      @@davebowman760 since you’re critiquing the Bible you’d have to point to what it actually says. Genesis 1:1 says “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”. This was the first epoch of creation. The first “day” so to speak. During this epoch the Sun was created before the earth. Also during this epoch the light from the Sun diffuses through the Earths atmosphere “let there be light”, Genesis 1:3. The Sun itself however only became discernible, as the source of this light, in the fourth creation epoch, the “fourth day”.
      The perspective of the narration is implicit in the text itself. The Bible was written for mankind and the Earth was prepared for mankind’s existence. So it makes total sense that the perspective of the creation account be written from the viewpoint of an observer on Earth.
      The Bible NEVER claims the Sun was created after the Earth. I’d encourage you to go over the first chapter of Genesis once more and read it with this information in mind. Thanks.

    • @davebowman760
      @davebowman760 7 місяців тому +27

      @@maambomumba6123 as David Wood says, "Miracle of reinterpretation!"

  • @danielvining4947
    @danielvining4947 8 місяців тому +717

    “The concept of day doesn’t mean day”
    *Ken Ham aggressively storms in and takes Dinesh’s mic*

    • @asagoldsmith3328
      @asagoldsmith3328 7 місяців тому +38

      Battle of the creationist hacks

    • @Mirrorgirl492
      @Mirrorgirl492 7 місяців тому +84

      And Jordan Petersen says: "That depends on what you mean by 'day'."

    • @smears6039
      @smears6039 7 місяців тому +33

      @@Mirrorgirl492then Peterson starts bawling his eyes out

    • @gips_123
      @gips_123 7 місяців тому +15

      The concept of day in the original Hebrew doesn’t mean day* if you couldn’t understand what he meant by that then you shouldn’t be participating in these debates in the first place

    • @bobbyfartz5591
      @bobbyfartz5591 7 місяців тому

      Jordan Peterson looks on happily

  • @NaveKnights
    @NaveKnights 15 днів тому +7

    Whether or not you believe in Religion or not, I fully believe that people have the right to believe in whatever gods they want to believe in.
    Wars caused by religion are not because of religion itself but people stating that their religion is the correct and HAS to be the correct one.
    This might put me in dirty water, but whatever you believe in, as long as it makes YOU happy then thats all that matters, trying to force other people into it is not going to make them want to join, neither does stating that what you believe in is fact, because theres always ambiguity within religion.
    Anyways, to anyone who sees this, have a wonderful day.

    • @abc456f
      @abc456f 10 днів тому

      Of course, freedom of thought, of belief. As long as it does no harm to others. But I choose to live my life believing in as many true things and as little false things.

    • @agear2
      @agear2 9 днів тому

      communism a religion?

    • @NaveKnights
      @NaveKnights 9 днів тому

      @@agear2 Uh, I don't think communism is a religion, is more of how the country is ran, completely different.

    • @rokaq5163
      @rokaq5163 18 годин тому

      ​@@agear2
      Religion = your personal beliefs regarding how the world around us operates based on divine and supernatural principles
      Politics = set of activities used to run the various insfrastructures and manage the many resources of a defined area or country
      Not the same thing

  • @DarkMatter2525
    @DarkMatter2525 8 місяців тому +174

    Dinesh just kept digging that hole.

    • @skepticalcentral8795
      @skepticalcentral8795 7 місяців тому +17

      MY MAN GOOD TO SEE YOU HERE!

    • @Green-ishEcho
      @Green-ishEcho 7 місяців тому +15

      THE LEGEND IS HERE!!

    • @rafetizer
      @rafetizer 7 місяців тому +5

      You just pop up everywhere lol

    • @magicker8052
      @magicker8052 7 місяців тому +3

      we're not worthy

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому +3

      not really - Alex just kept shifting semantics and changing contexts by manipulating language.

  • @thomasherzog86
    @thomasherzog86 8 місяців тому +97

    The funny thing about this is, that no scientist will tell you that we "KNOW" the universe had a beginning. We certainly know that its expending out of something we call singularity - but we dont know whether thats the beginning of its existence.
    However, we DO KNOW that the sun was before the earth.

    • @VenusFeuerFalle
      @VenusFeuerFalle 8 місяців тому +6

      even the singularity is nothing but a working hypothesis, which probably did never exist in the first place...

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 місяців тому +14

      Actually we really don't know if the earth or the sun was formed first, for all it's possible earth was formed as a rogue planet and only later entered the solar system.

    • @thomasherzog86
      @thomasherzog86 7 місяців тому +10

      @@AndrewJF
      Nope, thats pretty much impossible.

    • @matsab7930
      @matsab7930 7 місяців тому

      @@AndrewJFplanetary scientist here; we’re very confident that the earth formed after the sun. Even if you make the argument that it originated outside the solar system, we date it using the radioactive decay of material on earth. We can then date more primitive objects in the solar system such as asteroids to determine a sort of maximum age of the solar system. This all tends toward 4.6 billion years.
      The sun was the first body to form in our solar system; by definition this is the case because the collapse of a solar nebula into a star is what begins the formation of a solar system, hence it must be at least as old as the oldest bodies in the solar system (excepting those originating outside our solar system, which are a tiny minority), which puts the suns age at older than the Earth.
      There’s more to it than this, if you’re curious the research is generally publicly available; if it’s not, you can use sci-hub to access it ;)

    • @Ciph3rzer0
      @Ciph3rzer0 7 місяців тому +5

      Whatever the "universe" is changes the way you talk about it. Most of the time scientists are talking about the observable (material) universe. When they talk about the universe being compressed to a marble before the big bang, they mean the matter in the observable universe would be compressed to that size. It could have been a marble in an meter cubed block, which all also expanded. And of course there are components of the universe, of reality like forces, which didn't just emerge WITH the universe, because our models suppose the behavior of forces stays the same throughout time.
      Scientists talk about the "creation" of our *universe as we observe it today*. It's basically the boundary of what science could ever hope to explain. IMO There probably was or still is something else from which we our universe emerged. "empty space" has particles being created all the time. The universe could be an emergent phenomenon of what we call empty space. Some theoretical models work off of this idea.
      Apologists use a different conception of universe. They want to say that "creation of the universe" is everything that isn't heaven, the mortal realm. And then of course it sounds stupid to say a big bang 'from nothing' created the universe. Clearly it was God!
      I'm not sure if that distinction is clear, but science is very reserved about what it even claims it's possible to know. That's the difference. Science is mostly interested in what's "useful" rather than true. That's why we can use inaccurate orbital models of electrons to make predictions even though probability clouds are more accurate.
      Or why you can use a map to navigate even though the earth isn't flat. It's about the simplest model that can accurately predict outcomes given on the factors you need to account for. You don't need to account for curvature when driving to the pub.

  • @nathanedison8692
    @nathanedison8692 7 місяців тому +157

    Starts off trying to claim a scientific miracle in the Bible, and within a minute he resorts to the “Well the Bible’s not a science textbook” excuse. You can’t have it both ways. Either it’s talking about science and is wrong, or it’s not talking about science, negating the point of your entire argument.

    • @chazrooks4681
      @chazrooks4681 7 місяців тому +1

      How do you know that the actual clip was within a minute. When the clip is a minute long? Lol its been editied.

    • @nathanedison8692
      @nathanedison8692 7 місяців тому +7

      @@chazrooks4681 ok, 3 minutes. Whatever, same point.

    • @Truthman1-o3u
      @Truthman1-o3u 7 місяців тому

      The Old Testament is NOT supposed to be taken literally. It is symbolic, allegorical, mythological and metaphorical. When atheists dismiss Genesis so deftly, they are knocking down a strawman. They are deliberately, or perhaps not deliberately understanding the book in the manner that it was supposed to be understood. We are then at cross purposes, science and religion will never be reconciled in this way

    • @1986statechamps
      @1986statechamps 7 місяців тому +3

      Science has no answer

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 7 місяців тому

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

  • @brianhale2977
    @brianhale2977 11 днів тому +1

    If both "The Science" and "The Bible" are up for debate, then neither of them gets to be an authority on whether the other is wrong or not.

  • @fitnessteacher1845
    @fitnessteacher1845 2 місяці тому +58

    Nothing more frustrating when they move the goalposts well done for holding him accountable

    • @gabrielbartholomew4501
      @gabrielbartholomew4501 16 днів тому

      Who's they? Lol

    • @liljay9434
      @liljay9434 13 днів тому +1

      @@gabrielbartholomew4501 religious apologists

    • @gabrielbartholomew4501
      @gabrielbartholomew4501 13 днів тому

      @@liljay9434 so, not just everyone in general who moves goal posts? Only christian apologists in particular? What a dishonest way to discriminate people lol 😆

    • @liljay9434
      @liljay9434 13 днів тому +1

      @@gabrielbartholomew4501 well the video was about a religious apologist moving the goal post, which is why I assumed that’s who he meant. And it’s not discriminating either, i don’t know where that hostility is coming from. I was answering your question 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @gabrielbartholomew4501
      @gabrielbartholomew4501 13 днів тому

      @@liljay9434 well thank you for answering the question. Although by doing so I guess you took the heat for the answered to the question aimed at someone else. And I was not trying to be hostile at all, the hostility comes from the nature of my statement, for example we could also say that saying "they" describing a whole group of people to be doing something that is not exclusive of them at all to be hostile, but it's just the nature of his/her statement. I mean no hate at all brother. But don't do you think it's unfair to put a bunch of people in the same category under the premiss of prejudice? Not to mention that D'Souza is not properly educated for the subject at all. Alex is clearly superior and his opposition made a fool of himself by presenting a horrible argument and then trying to move the goal post. Thoughts?

  • @mikeleaptrott
    @mikeleaptrott 8 місяців тому +104

    This was great! I watched the whole debate twice. It’s hard to tell if D’Sousa is this incompetent or just didn’t care to prepare at all. Maybe both.

    • @Sanxioned1
      @Sanxioned1 8 місяців тому +25

      It's both. He got so used to steamrolling unregulated college first years that he thinks he doesn't need to use anything more sophisticated.
      Look at how he keeps trying to shift the topic to what the word "day" means instead of dealing with the incorrect chronology of the Bible. What a day means is irrelevant -- sequence is what matters.
      And some other debaters would definitely take the bait and let this snake slither away.

    • @ghytd766
      @ghytd766 7 місяців тому +4

      It's worse, he's dishonest to the core.

    • @shambhav9534
      @shambhav9534 7 місяців тому +4

      Not being prepared is fine to a degree, but he didn't even know what he even believed, IMO.

    • @Vinny2fingers
      @Vinny2fingers 6 місяців тому +3

      It's because people who believe the Bible don't question it so he's always had people who believe every word. You'd be surprised how many people think the earth is 3000 years old.

    • @emmanuel.n8458
      @emmanuel.n8458 5 місяців тому +2

      ​@@Vinny2fingersthe Bible is the most questioned, analyzed, book in history..no other book comes close. This guys just not smart enough to defend the Bible. Also, the Bible account of creation makes absolute sense unless if you wanna tell me you have proof to show you can get smth from nothing.

  • @kami_1789
    @kami_1789 8 місяців тому +134

    Dinesh is so insufferable, but apologists usually are

    • @DRWH044
      @DRWH044 8 місяців тому +11

      Dinesh is no apologist. He is not an authority on theology.

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@DRWH044Exactly.

    • @solacedagony1234
      @solacedagony1234 8 місяців тому +13

      @@DRWH044 Apologists aren't either usually.

    • @DRWH044
      @DRWH044 8 місяців тому

      @@solacedagony1234 I don't know what apologists you are familiar with, many are not, but many others are.

    • @solacedagony1234
      @solacedagony1234 8 місяців тому +11

      @@DRWH044 Apologists are there to keep their flock. You're talking about scholars.

  • @The.Almighty.Daltonious
    @The.Almighty.Daltonious Місяць тому

    I could have sworn public execution became illegal a couple centuries ago😭😭😭😭

  • @Deadman1000
    @Deadman1000 7 місяців тому +363

    I first saw Dinesh get owned by Hitchens and now I get to see the next generation do it too, well done 😂

    • @PramodKumar-gy8lb
      @PramodKumar-gy8lb 7 місяців тому +12

      When you hold on to a false premise every generation will smack you down.

    • @lukepoplawski3230
      @lukepoplawski3230 7 місяців тому

      I haven’t seen that debate yet, but funnily enough if you watch the intro to this discussion two moderators discuss the Hitchens v Denish debate and they both agree that Denish got the better of Hitchens. Again, I haven’t seen it and can’t draw an opinion yet, but that’s what the commenters from Pangburn (the hosts of this discussion) said.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf 7 місяців тому +1

      @@lukepoplawski3230he gave Hitchens a hard time . Alex had him on the run for most of this .

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@PramodKumar-gy8lb you there: prove that the universe happened by accident

    • @robertluechtefeld5017
      @robertluechtefeld5017 7 місяців тому

      That's a matter opinion.

  • @ST0IC
    @ST0IC 8 місяців тому +72

    Theist: "My holy book is in alignment with modern science! It's a miracle!"
    Atheist: "Hold on, here is a scientific contradiction in it"
    Theist: "Well, it's not a science book!"
    What in the name of critical thinki- 🤦🏼‍♂️

    • @PicaMonedula
      @PicaMonedula 7 місяців тому

      Most Christians around the western world dont take the old testament literally. That is something americans share with less developed countries.
      If you want an interesting debate dont debate fundamentalists be they religious or atheist. Its an easy way to feel smarter but its boring…
      Jesus was a stoic btw

    • @charliecinnella9090
      @charliecinnella9090 7 місяців тому +5

      Nice story. Did you make it up yourself?

    • @funnygaming2672
      @funnygaming2672 7 місяців тому +1

      you know that expert all around the world don't know /agree on how the universe started right !? im just impress that these religious people even knew the concept of outer space and creation with so little technologies,they not more wrong ...

    • @PicaMonedula
      @PicaMonedula 7 місяців тому

      Its ironic that strawmen do not constitute prober critical thinking.

    • @praisephillips9459
      @praisephillips9459 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@funnygaming2672 yeah the origin of the universe is not known and has only been theorized...the formation of the solar system with the earth on the other hand has been deduced by observation and proven

  • @steeter93
    @steeter93 6 місяців тому +147

    Like watching a sand castle slowly collapse.

    • @MaGaO
      @MaGaO 4 місяці тому +3

      Not slowly though

    • @andresfelipegaspar2980
      @andresfelipegaspar2980 4 місяці тому +1

      But this was a bunch of naipes without any kind of shape falling apart

    • @gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120
      @gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120 4 місяці тому +2

      Because Genesis is not a History book but one of myths as most of the Bible, understanding myth as a narrative to explain something profund not easily explained otherwise.
      Some events described are historic but many are not
      If you defend the Bible validation as an History book, you will always loose

    • @MaGaO
      @MaGaO 4 місяці тому +1

      @@gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120
      Unfortunately, some argue for its fitting current science through "interpretation" (AKA hermeneutics).

  • @nicaspin
    @nicaspin 14 днів тому +2

    Alex O'Connor is brilliant. Great video.

  • @chinonsooragwam8833
    @chinonsooragwam8833 7 місяців тому +196

    Why is this guy arguing for Genesis as a scientifically accurate representation when early church fathers agreed it was metaphorical💀

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 6 місяців тому +3

      Who were those early church fathers?

    • @juanausensi499
      @juanausensi499 6 місяців тому +18

      @@ApolloThyrteen Before protestantism and literalism, there were catholics and orthodox. They always saw genesis as a metaphor. Literalism is just one of the last heresies.

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 6 місяців тому +10

      @@juanausensi499 a 3 minute google search proves you wrong. 3 literal minutes, not allegorical minutes. MOST take it allegorically but there were many who took it literally just like today. You should be able to defend your Church without lying.

    • @juanausensi499
      @juanausensi499 6 місяців тому +11

      ​@@ApolloThyrteen The existence of non-literal passages is scholarly acknowledged as far as the 1st century, including the genesis narrative. The general idea was even older and it's contained in the proper text. Read Galatians 4:21-31 or Hebrews 4:12m for example, or see also how Matthew interprets Hosea 11:1 and Isaiah 7:14.
      There is also a huge gap between the Bible is compiled as something we can recognize today and its translation to languages that regular people could understand. At that time, the interpretation of the people was the interpretation of the church. Of course, it stands to reason it is possible for latin/greek-knowing individuals who interpreted the Bible literally, BUT that means they weren't catholics/orthodox. That's why i said catholic/orthodox and not christians.
      I bet in your 3 minute search you didn't found anything from Philo of Alexandria, Origen, Iraeneus of Lyons or Augustine of Hippo.
      It doesn't matter, really. I would like you and me to be able to reach some sort of agreement: can we say literalism was pretty minoritary BEFORE protestantism?
      This shouldn't be relevant , but i'm not defending any church.

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 6 місяців тому +4

      @@juanausensi499 first I apologize for the unnecessary sarcasm in my previous post. I cannot say what Catholic or Protestants believed since most couldn’t read themselves. I’d have to concede that they believed whatever they were taught by priests. What I can say is the Jewish calendar is based on a literal interpretation of the Genesis account.
      The Jewish Virtual library has an article called Judaism and Evolution. Here is an excerpt from the article:
      The vast majority of classical rabbis hold that God created the world close to 6,000 years ago and created Adam and Eve from clay. This view is based on a chronology developed in a midrash, Seder Olam, which was based on a literal reading of the book of Genesis. It is considered to have been written by the Tanna Yose ben Halafta and covers history from the creation of the universe to the construction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. This chronology is widely accepted among most Orthodox Judaism today.
      The article goes on to explain how those views changed throughout history.

  • @sparksdog8111
    @sparksdog8111 7 місяців тому +247

    "Alright, so..." just might be the funniest line ever said, at least within this specific context.

  • @InShadowsLinger
    @InShadowsLinger 8 місяців тому +125

    I loved how you mopped the floor with him and didn’t give him any room for bullshit.

    • @InShadowsLinger
      @InShadowsLinger 7 місяців тому

      @@amt4653 thanks

    • @cuzzohh2768
      @cuzzohh2768 7 місяців тому

      Continue on living your spiritually shallow shithole of a life and see where that gets your you purposeless sack of cells and shit.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому +4

      by misunderstanding the point, yes.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 місяців тому +10

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue the only person misunderstanding the point here, is you

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 місяців тому +3

      ​​@@ithurtsbecauseitstrueWhen you have to misunderstand truth to even get the point, you're not making a point or telling the truth. But you are right about the truth hurting, bc you've lashed out at like 4 truthful comments on here they hurt you so bad. You know, you can just jump over to the truth here with us and stop hurting, right?

  • @TheTruest
    @TheTruest 27 днів тому +2

    Some people take Genesis literally, others recognize it as a poem or allegorical.
    It's all about what u want to see and what argument u want to come with when it comes to the creation story.

    • @donfette5301
      @donfette5301 26 днів тому +1

      Genesis is a silly primitive myth made up by Bronze Age savages. Yawn.

  • @planetlumi4138
    @planetlumi4138 8 місяців тому +337

    Alex is back to his old debating

    • @Dann-md9eq
      @Dann-md9eq 7 місяців тому +3

      And we miss that

    • @Johnvwilliams0
      @Johnvwilliams0 7 місяців тому

      Yes he debates Uneducated shills and claims he’s debunking Christianity 😂

    • @jackwhitbread4583
      @jackwhitbread4583 7 місяців тому

      ​@@Dann-md9eqI don't, honestly he's a pretty average debator and nowhere near the league of Dawkins, Dillahunty or Ra. There are dozens and dozens of atheist activists who are a million times more effective than Alex.

    • @Winskl9010
      @Winskl9010 7 місяців тому +12

      @@jackwhitbread4583You don’t know anything about what qualifies as a good debaters if you genuinely think Richard Dawkins is a better debater than him 😂 it’s so obvious you’re a disguised hater. The man is only 24 and is on an equal level/better than the ones you listed

    • @justsomeguy859
      @justsomeguy859 7 місяців тому +4

      @@jackwhitbread4583Aron Ra is a horrible debater. I want to like him, but he just embarrasses himself. He’s not careful with his words or his thinking, and he goes off on completely unrelated tangents arguing against irrelevant points that the other person never made. Matt is pretty good in debates, but his debate/conversation with Alex about veganism was just flat out embarrassing for Matt. And I say that as a person who is not vegan. I agree with Matt on the subject, and still found his arguments to be horrible. He is nowhere near Alex’s level in knowledge of philosophy, or just base intellect. Alex is charismatic, knowledgeable, articulate, and absolutely brilliant. He is already surpassing all the great atheists that came before him.

  • @Suparaf
    @Suparaf 7 місяців тому +164

    Alex has a very sharp mind. Dinesh probably thought he was debating some college student.

    • @tcamp1969
      @tcamp1969 7 місяців тому +4

      Dinesh clearly didn't prep at all for this.

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 7 місяців тому +4

      Not really. Even a 5 year old can see through his bullshit

    • @DominicSJarrett
      @DominicSJarrett 7 місяців тому +6

      That changed after Alex's opening speech. You can tell when Dinesh stood up and started his opening. You could hear in his voice he started crapping himself realising what he got himself into.

    • @Nuffsed81
      @Nuffsed81 7 місяців тому +5

      ​@@subhuman3408care to explain how Alex is bullshiting? or are you just going to assert "bullshit" and hope nobody asks for an example of how? Clearly the video shows who is full of bs. The Bible was worng and the dishonest muppet can't even admit it. Isn't dishonesty suppose to be sinful.

    • @johnallen8043
      @johnallen8043 7 місяців тому

      Dinesh was unprepared and Alex was uneducated.

  • @grayintheuk8021
    @grayintheuk8021 7 місяців тому +32

    Cognative disconnect with this magical thinker. Nice job Alex.

  • @iammichaeldavis
    @iammichaeldavis 8 місяців тому +250

    “You can’t just move the goalposts; especially if you’re still gonna miss” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @d4024
      @d4024 7 місяців тому +4

      Yeah when conversations devolve from truth seeking to rhetorical scoring.

    • @iammichaeldavis
      @iammichaeldavis 7 місяців тому +1

      @@georgehatzimanolakis1904 might want to carefully re-read what he said, big dawg

    • @iammichaeldavis
      @iammichaeldavis 7 місяців тому

      @@georgehatzimanolakis1904 con-ver-say-shuns, big homie

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 7 місяців тому

      @@iammichaeldavis oh, my bad

    • @bennin9455
      @bennin9455 7 місяців тому

      He didn't even make a point though science is not 100% true it's theory

  • @CatDaddyGuitar
    @CatDaddyGuitar 8 місяців тому +120

    The stunned look on Dinesh's face 😂😂😂
    Alex slapped him hard.

    • @tuffwith2effs899
      @tuffwith2effs899 7 місяців тому +3

      How somebody who doesn't see this coming ended up in this debate is beyond me.

    • @CatDaddyGuitar
      @CatDaddyGuitar 7 місяців тому +8

      @@tuffwith2effs899 Desperately trying to defend his confirmation bias. The problem with Dinesh, Tour, Peterson, etc is that they've invested their entire reputation on being intellectually dishonest and if they concede to any logical conclusion, they're ruined.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      ....only in how to describe depth to someone obviously going for retarded verbal twists and cheap shots. It's hard to describe nuance to a strawmanning low-brow gotcha-artist.

    • @munchkingod6
      @munchkingod6 7 місяців тому

      @@CatDaddyGuitarthis. The only way Dinesh can maintain his positions (especially political ones) is by lying. He lies constantly because his political beliefs are fundamentally incompatible with reality.

    • @rathraven1313
      @rathraven1313 3 місяці тому

      Alex needs to be slapped by the fact a society based Christian valves allows him to exist.

  • @Sam-e9m4z
    @Sam-e9m4z 6 днів тому +2

    Oh that was incredible, I love it. Alex mopped the floor with him ❤

  • @johnanthony1141
    @johnanthony1141 7 місяців тому +42

    Person: I'm going to be debating someone.
    Other person: oh cool...who are you debating?
    Person: Alex O'Connor
    Other person: been nice knowing you

    • @kidohchi
      @kidohchi 7 місяців тому

      No sh!t-
      He is sharp and knowledgeable

    • @geroffmilan3328
      @geroffmilan3328 6 місяців тому

      Other person: have you prepared your will & put your estate in order?
      Dinesh: what does "prepare" mean?

    • @tklyte
      @tklyte 4 місяці тому

      😂🤣🤣 That made my day.

    • @rathraven1313
      @rathraven1313 3 місяці тому

      @@kidohchi Like a five year old not getting his favorite toy.

  • @alecbarrett3607
    @alecbarrett3607 2 місяці тому +107

    "And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day." Genesis 1:3-5

    • @HH-hm3qn
      @HH-hm3qn 2 місяці тому +10

      Right?! I was thinking that too when I watched this. What's the business about Day 4?

    • @beewest5704
      @beewest5704 2 місяці тому +37

      Day 1: light & darkness
      Day 2: sky & sea
      Day 3: land
      Day 4: SUN, moon & sky

    • @missyllanita
      @missyllanita 2 місяці тому +14

      This is all about what came first the chicken or the egg. God made the plants with it's seeds and the next day the plants had the sun. Why can't God not create something in one day? Time does not exist where he is. He created time.

    • @LuisRivers-g7b
      @LuisRivers-g7b 2 місяці тому +6

      I was just wondering how "God" had Idea to create without a brain or thoughts!
      There has to be something available in life in order to be creative with!! Hense,"God" is a ridiculous concept.
      For instance:" let there be light" how the hell is light even a concept if it never existed!!!
      "Let there be water" if the concept never appeared in a thought that was never a thought!!!
      If someone here can explain this ,then, you are the smartest person in the universe!!!!

    • @LuisRivers-g7b
      @LuisRivers-g7b 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@beewest5704I was just wondering how "God" had Idea to create without a brain or thoughts!
      There has to be something available in life in order to be creative with!! Hense,"God" is a ridiculous concept.
      For instance:" let there be light" how the hell is light even a concept if it never existed!!!
      "Let there be water" if the concept never appeared in a thought that was never a thought!!!
      If someone here can explain this ,then, you are the smartest person in the universe!!!!

  • @ratatoskr9366
    @ratatoskr9366 8 місяців тому +18

    Omg that pause and cut to both of your faces was like a skit from the Office😂

  • @ranbirsingh7666
    @ranbirsingh7666 Місяць тому +1

    Iam sure there is more important topics to discuss than how the universe began…. All those Billions of years ago

    • @axel9473
      @axel9473 Місяць тому

      I'm sure there is more important things to do then watching this video and commenting about it, and yet here we are...

    • @ranbirsingh7666
      @ranbirsingh7666 Місяць тому

      @ Yh - should have skipped it .. but hey can’t bring that time back again.. 🫣😅

  • @okon7464
    @okon7464 8 місяців тому +71

    When bible says something true:
    "Ohh wow, how could they know that, it has to be God who tell them that"
    When Bible says something untrue:
    "Oh no no, Bible isn't scientific text, you can't expect everything from it, it's obviously based on knowledge of people in that era"

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 місяців тому

      Actually we really don't know if the earth or the sun was formed first, for all it's possible earth was formed as a rogue planet and only later entered the solar system.

    • @okon7464
      @okon7464 7 місяців тому +13

      @@AndrewJF we actually pretty sure know that sun was formed first

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 місяців тому +1

      @@okon7464 just like Einstein was pretty sure the universe was eternal?

    • @okon7464
      @okon7464 7 місяців тому +12

      @@AndrewJF nuh, like we are sure that gravity exists

    • @vtwin1979
      @vtwin1979 7 місяців тому +1

      @@AndrewJF
      That’s just a theory.
      Not a fact. Are you trying say it’s a fact?

  • @AnnoyingNewsletters
    @AnnoyingNewsletters 5 місяців тому +53

    Apologists took gold 🥇 in Mental Gymnastics, Jumping to Conclusions & Moving the Goal Posts.

    • @John1samar
      @John1samar 4 місяці тому +1

      Earth is existence.
      😮
      Repent atheist.

    • @markmorris8532
      @markmorris8532 4 місяці тому

      ​@@John1samar
      😂

    • @southernpatriot6169
      @southernpatriot6169 4 місяці тому

      Dinesh is not an Apologist. Let this clown debate a true Apologist !

    • @Heeect00rrr
      @Heeect00rrr 2 місяці тому

      Verse one: let there be light 🤷

    • @TheBigRaisi
      @TheBigRaisi 15 днів тому

      ​@@Heeect00rrrsun isn't the only source of light , and " let there be light" could literally mean the creation of concept of light in a world of darkness

  • @MisterLumpkin
    @MisterLumpkin 7 місяців тому +361

    Dinesh looked like he got kicked by 2000 mules.

    • @rikardotsamsiyu
      @rikardotsamsiyu 7 місяців тому +2

      😂😆

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 місяців тому +2

      This would be funnier if it were true.

    • @alexanderkurz1603
      @alexanderkurz1603 7 місяців тому

      and he wanted to fuck all 2000 of them

    • @briankenyon1543
      @briankenyon1543 7 місяців тому

      ​@@markwildt5728cope more😂

    • @MrMusic238
      @MrMusic238 7 місяців тому

      A jackass getting kicked by 2000 jackasses

  • @CrawfishDeluxe
    @CrawfishDeluxe 7 годин тому

    "So they got the order wrong"
    "well what you have to understand was the time periods are not days, they're epochs"
    "okay so they still got the order wrong"

  • @Marcel-yu2fw
    @Marcel-yu2fw 7 місяців тому +96

    There's (mostly) 2 possibilities: The universe had a beginning or it didn't. They had a 50% chance of guessing correctly.

    • @DJ-ct6so
      @DJ-ct6so 7 місяців тому +2

      It doesn't necessarily work like that. Consider this: "either some kind of god exists or he/she/it doesn't. You have a 50% chance of guessing correctly." Conclusion: We can't calculate probabilities for events that we don't fully understand.

    • @ajax201000
      @ajax201000 7 місяців тому +20

      ​@@DJ-ct6soThats a false equivalency. We know the universe objectively exists and therefore it either had a begining or it did not. God is not provable and is not supported by any data or science so it is not 50/50 whether he created the universe any more than saying that its 50/50 as to whether a magical otter made the universe.

    • @ajax201000
      @ajax201000 7 місяців тому +2

      @Vergil512 Then that wouldnt be the God of the Christian faith but a sentient universe and those 2 things are not the same.

    • @drnanard9605
      @drnanard9605 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@Vergil512ah yes, the whole "I'm gonna redefine the whole concept of God so that it fits with what we know about science". Well, maybe God is actually the half-empty box of Cheerios that sits in my cupboard. Who knows!!

    • @CampCucumber
      @CampCucumber 7 місяців тому +1

      @@ajax201000do you think it was a 50/50 guess?

  • @albertobottopoala7691
    @albertobottopoala7691 8 місяців тому +83

    Protect this man at all costs

    • @weedlol
      @weedlol 8 місяців тому +15

      Yeah we need to get Dinesh out of there before he dies of embarassment.

    • @cassiusdhami9215
      @cassiusdhami9215 8 місяців тому +4

      👏🏾​@@weedlol👍🏾
      😆😅😂🤣

    • @cassiusdhami9215
      @cassiusdhami9215 8 місяців тому

      I'd be okay with that ​@@weedlol... unfortunately you can't embarrass the shameless. 😊

    • @paulrawlinson8653
      @paulrawlinson8653 8 місяців тому +2

      Protect him from what?

    • @Feefa99
      @Feefa99 8 місяців тому +4

      Me jumping with backflip in front of Alex protecting him from religious fanatics while Whitney Houston singing

  • @rogerwelsh2335
    @rogerwelsh2335 7 місяців тому +66

    Love this clip.
    Dinesh acts like such a know it all and to see him at a loss for words is priceless

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 місяців тому +1

      When was he at a loss for words exactly?

    • @joshua.recovers
      @joshua.recovers 7 місяців тому

      Typical kind of response to someone who doesn't believe.

    • @TheCaliRhino
      @TheCaliRhino 7 місяців тому

      Yeah, cuz all those edits & jump cuts make it really clear what responses were made to which statements. I don’t go to Dinesh for my theology, but the interpretation of Genesis is misleading if you’re looking at it as literal. Let there be light wasn’t the creation of the sun, it was the clearing of the sky/clouds/darkness.

    • @Person19943
      @Person19943 7 місяців тому +1

      @@markwildt5728when he contradicted what he just said himself. “How did the Bible know?” And knowing are observations, and observations is science, and the Bible is it a scientific book. It all gets confusing and it’s because he rushed out his words

    • @benjamink8448
      @benjamink8448 7 місяців тому +1

      "..... alright... so, so so ... so we're... yes ahem". Technically, he said some words right?

  • @Judesmood118
    @Judesmood118 Місяць тому

    Finally someone who is immune to Dinesh’s weaseling! Bravo Alex!

  • @mocha9072
    @mocha9072 7 місяців тому +93

    Dinesh D'Souza trying to be a Texas sharpshooter but he draws the circle next to the bullet hole instead of around it

  • @MilwaukeeAtheists
    @MilwaukeeAtheists 8 місяців тому +20

    Also, dinesh doesnt realize that "in the beginning" is only in the greek. Εν αρχη. The Hebrew is better understood as "when god created..."

    • @ZachFish-
      @ZachFish- 8 місяців тому +2

      How does that make sense for John 1:1?

    • @AurorXZ
      @AurorXZ 8 місяців тому +6

      ​@@ZachFish- The writer of John famously used the Septuagint translation for his prologue.

    • @ElusiveEel
      @ElusiveEel 7 місяців тому +1

      @@ZachFish- Different authors with different voices. It's like comparing Deuteronomy 24 with Mark 10, they're obviously not from the same God.

    • @mauddib1761
      @mauddib1761 7 місяців тому

      From listening to a few different Hebrew translators, apparently in Genesis the plural "Gods" or variations like "powerful ones" are used. It was the later translations into other languages that changed it from Gods to God. I don't read Hebrew so I've no idea how accurate that is, but there are many translators who seem to agree that the plural is used a lot in Genesis in particular

    • @AurorXZ
      @AurorXZ 7 місяців тому +2

      @@mauddib1761 I've heard the same occasionally online, but it incorrect. "Elohim" is used in the Priestly texts, but it is grammatically singular and functions as a concretized abstract plural (we see this used of other singular deities like Dagon as well). The overwhelming academic consensus is that "Elohim" is a singular figure in the narrative.

  • @SadamYT
    @SadamYT 5 місяців тому +64

    "The need for comfort and the need to belong will make people accept the most stupid conditions and then defend them as their own." - Christopher Hitchens
    (forgive possible misquotation, was written from memory)

    • @NevillePeter777
      @NevillePeter777 4 місяці тому +3

      would that include you?

    • @ankyspon1701
      @ankyspon1701 4 місяці тому +1

      The Bible was also written from memory but you don't appear willing to forgive that.

    • @vtwin1979
      @vtwin1979 4 місяці тому +5

      @@ankyspon1701
      It was god inspired was it not?
      And if you think it was written with memory relapses how can you take it as truth?
      Now you have just painted yourself into a corner.

    • @oneyearunder
      @oneyearunder 4 місяці тому +1

      Dude said that 4 days passed before the sun was formed, but pray tell, how would a day pass without light to denote the days passing? The sun was formed before the first day, while heaven and earth were created first, it was created to have a space to put things in, then the sun was made, then 3 verses later, the earth was formed
      When the earth was created, it was a ball of water, specifically mentioned to be formless

    • @TW-pk7lu
      @TW-pk7lu 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@vtwin1979the same way you believe scientist. Faith.

  • @timmayers4965
    @timmayers4965 28 днів тому

    ‘How did the writers know’. It’s 50/50 and we’re still not absolutely certain that it did.

  • @jaegarbombs7297
    @jaegarbombs7297 7 місяців тому +33

    Dont forget the plants were created on day 3 before the sun that the plants need for photosynthesis

    • @0pp841
      @0pp841 7 місяців тому

      If God used a big bang explosion to create everything, then there would probably be some light and heat surrounding the planet before the sun got into it's position.

    • @JakeLentz
      @JakeLentz 7 місяців тому +10

      this is a lie he said let there be light first before plants, do your research

    • @vastabyss6496
      @vastabyss6496 7 місяців тому +16

      @@JakeLentz it also states that the sun and moon were created on day 4. Where was the light coming from if not from the sun?

    • @tarfielarchelone2674
      @tarfielarchelone2674 7 місяців тому +7

      ​@@JakeLentz sun doesn't exist until the 4th day oops lol

    • @mihaimitican7182
      @mihaimitican7182 7 місяців тому +3

      Why do people assume that our understanding of science and we can argue with God that his ways of working doesn't make sense, ye it does not make sense for us... . Wise orthodox priests explained to me that the light on 1st day came from withing God and it was enough for all the universe, so that light could sustain plants untill God probably said that his light should not be our source of light and created big engines(Stars) with sustenable energy for millenias.

  • @sallymoore7415
    @sallymoore7415 8 місяців тому +32

    I just love this young man we need more like him 🙏

    • @lotanerve
      @lotanerve 8 місяців тому +3

      So what are the stupid prayer hands for?

    • @odraciskatube7725
      @odraciskatube7725 8 місяців тому

      @@lotanerve its the universal call sign for atheist

    • @sallymoore7415
      @sallymoore7415 7 місяців тому

      @@lotanerve They are stupid Thank you Hands

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      the more snark and semantical twists he uses, the more unserious and malicious i find him to be.
      he should ONCE attempt a steelman

    • @odraciskatube7725
      @odraciskatube7725 7 місяців тому

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue i think he did(soft steelman/remark) in the beginning of the debate. he even stood up, and his argument bordered on racism. something along the lines that allot of atheist are from Great-Britain and yes it was a stupendous moment. full debate.
      ua-cam.com/video/UMKkX8qRHsw/v-deo.html

  • @zanido9073
    @zanido9073 7 місяців тому +27

    "Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

    • @skpt516
      @skpt516 Місяць тому

      Not when the arms of the clock have fallen off

  • @BoostBuff
    @BoostBuff 10 годин тому

    That pause was incredible, lol

  • @amt4653
    @amt4653 7 місяців тому +5

    I love how Alex included a diagram that beautifully demonstrates how the 6 days of creation were not literal, and I dont think he knows it. Pause the video and notice how the top half mirrors the bottom half. It's a parallelism, which is a form of Hebrew poetry. It uses a song-like rhythm to reinforce the message being made. The second part completes the ideas introduced in the first part. The order of the creation events had to be molded to fit the style of poem, not the other way around.

  • @aboveman5321
    @aboveman5321 8 місяців тому +34

    Who else gets a little schadenfreude from this? It just makes me happy to see these arrogant people make fools of themselves in front of people like Alex.

    • @jsmit9484
      @jsmit9484 7 місяців тому +1

      It brings back a little of the "old school" new atheist fire. Exept Alex's debates have so much more depth than the Hitch, Harris, Dawkins debates.
      I hate that I love this, but I do.

    • @robertluechtefeld5017
      @robertluechtefeld5017 7 місяців тому +1

      The epitome of arrogance is to presume the religion of modern science can answer or at some point in the future can discover the answer to all the mysteries of the universe. When science creates something from nothing, or creates a single-celled living organism from amino acids, or proteins in a lab, I MIGHT lend them some "street cred"; until then, I'll keep my faith in the Triune God-head. Nice try, epic fail.

    • @jsmit9484
      @jsmit9484 7 місяців тому

      @@robertluechtefeld5017 Just keep on moving the goalposts buddy

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +1

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @shambhav9534
      @shambhav9534 7 місяців тому

      @@robertluechtefeld5017 No, maybe science all questions ever asked, but that doesn't mean we need to believe in a space wizard. The questions will go unanswered, I guess. That's better than making them up based on a dubious book.
      What do you mean by "something"? And what do you mean by "nothing". Assuming default meanings, yeah, happens all the time. We can measure this quantum fluctuation pretty easily too.
      And we'll get there with the single-celled living organism, I hope. We know the mechanism involved, and there's no reason to suspect it couldn't happen. Totally feasible, plus we have a ton of supporting evidence. It's only a matter of time.

  • @michaelbuick6995
    @michaelbuick6995 7 місяців тому +12

    The look on Alex's face of "dude are you fn serious right now?"

  • @mufasachainbreaker7757
    @mufasachainbreaker7757 Місяць тому +1

    The religious right seems to still have so much trouble acknowledging that the book isnt consistently literal and infallible...
    If you ask them if Jesus was a sheep, they will say "of course not thats just discussing an archetypical representation.".
    Then if you ask them if the universe was made in 7 days, all the sudden the writers of the Bible didn't know what metaphor, poetry, analogy, narrative, and archetypes were.
    As a devoted Christian who believes evolution occurs, it often pains me to see a debate like this...

  • @ІванПугач-х5к
    @ІванПугач-х5к 2 місяці тому +9

    It depends on how one interprets Scripture and scientific evidence regarding the sun's and Earth's ages, as these are speculative discussions that may or may not be accurate. The Bible in Genesis focuses more on why the universe was created rather than how. However, based on verse 6, one could argue that the expanse (or Earth) was formed after the sun. Before this, the Earth appears to have been a water-covered or hydrogen-dominated sphere, which might not align with modern definitions of a planet of Earth.

    • @donfette5301
      @donfette5301 26 днів тому

      It’s just a silly myth made up by ignorant superstitious savages in the Bronze Age. Means nothing, in reality.

  • @johnjames9359
    @johnjames9359 3 місяці тому +52

    “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you” - Werner Heisenberg, father of quantum physics

    • @mistere5857
      @mistere5857 2 місяці тому +7

      I don't know if he meant that how I interpret it, but it is a beautiful statement. I've heard more than one scientist say once they understood "X" they became theist. Insert any field you want into "X". Apparently once you see how intricate and fragile the building blocks of the universe are, you start to believe in a higher power.

    • @PierreLucSex
      @PierreLucSex 2 місяці тому +5

      That's entirely bs. Absolutely crushing intelligent minds have tackled metaphysics without resorting to such rhetoric nonsense.

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 2 місяці тому +9

      That is pretty much the opposite of how things evolved in history. The first gulp of natural science was with the blessing of the church and religious scholars. Unfortunately when science began to contradict their holy book we found they were willing to imprison Galileo for suggesting the earth was not the centre of the universe.

    • @marismcmullen6023
      @marismcmullen6023 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@ARRAM57 that's not why Galileo was imprisoned. You should look into it. The real history is much more interesting

    • @guyr3618
      @guyr3618 2 місяці тому +1

      Oh man God is tiny

  • @KgBee
    @KgBee 7 місяців тому +38

    “You cant move the goal post, especially when you’re going to miss” was the coldest line in history.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      Shows off his snark and lack of seriousness beautifully

    • @MasterPoppers
      @MasterPoppers 7 місяців тому +4

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Man, that copium must be great.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 місяців тому +4

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue it's hard to take people like you seriously, to be fair

    • @lVideoWatcherl
      @lVideoWatcherl 7 місяців тому

      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue why should anybody take a bloviating fraud like D'Souza seriously?

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 місяців тому

      ​@@MasterPoppersAlex completely dodged the question and deflected, then had the audacity to accuse Dinesh of moving the goal post... 🤦🏻‍♂️ What was it you were saying about copium?

  • @nimalykkeberg6449
    @nimalykkeberg6449 9 днів тому +1

    I watched the full debate, and i have never seen such a clear winner in any form of a theological debate. Alex cooked him

  • @einsibongo
    @einsibongo 7 місяців тому +53

    The Hitch rising, Alex O'Connor, is outstanding, been following for years. Just gets better and better.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 7 місяців тому

      @@koschmx If you don't know then leave it there. You're clearly cherry picking. If seriously want to critique his response to the question, you should listen to the response.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 7 місяців тому

      @@koschmx It looks fine because its obvious that this is edited for time and to promote watching the full debate. Hence your comment makes no sense, unless you are cherry picking which you are.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 7 місяців тому

      @@koschmx If you want to know what parts were left out watch the damn thing. You're hung up on miniscule details of the editing and blowing them out of proportion when its obvious these are just sound bites to entice you into watching the ACTUAL DEBATE. You were openly arguing from your incredulity so yes, while poorly executed, you were being deceptive and continue to do so by denying it even though it is so blatantly obvious.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 7 місяців тому

      @@koschmx Yeah you don't care yet you argue. If you don't want to be informed on this specific topic thats fine but then why do you need to have fight so hard to justify your flawed reasoning? You could have just said ok and then move on, or not responded at all, but you CARED to do so. If you don't care then why do you care? By the way, the specific argument in this short was cut out and uploaded as a ten minuets long if time is your issue. Also, about your opinion on Gods, I didn't ask, don't matter. Never did I indicate that I wanted the information so way to show me how much you don't care. Whatever your stance is the point still stands that you are cherry picking aspects of the short to make it seem like it "makes him look bad" when in reality it's just a regular youtube short and nobody thinks that but you.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 7 місяців тому

      @@koschmx Now everyone who calls you out for blatantly making misinformed judgments is a "fanboy?" You don't want to waste an hour of your free time to properly educate yourself before opening your mouth but you'll spend MULTIPULL HOURS making excuses for a simple laps in judgment that you could have moved on from LITERAL days ago. If you don't care why do you care?

  • @ST0IC
    @ST0IC 8 місяців тому +30

    The mental gymnastics and confirmation bias in these theistic arguments are insufferable 💀

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому +2

      not really. It's just hard to discuss things properly with self-centered materialists.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 місяців тому +10

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue what a lame response lol....like a child who is butthurt: "yeah, well you're selfish so there"....

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 місяців тому +7

      ​@@ithurtsbecauseitstrueThe people who are humbly accepting that the facts and realities of the universe are true, and the made up story that each of us is special and loved by the divine creator of the universe is what's NOT true, proves that religious people are the self centered ones. We don't live based on a belief that we'll get eternal paradise while everyone else burns bc we're so special. THAT is the definition of self centered, and you might want to look up what "True" means as well if you're gonna keep such a bogus profile name.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Matt-the-Wise since you have to strawman the position, you defeated nothing

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 місяців тому +3

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Add "straw man position" to your homework, bc you missed that one too. A straw man argument is utilizing a false equivalency in lieu of something to negate it. So if I had said "your response sounds exactly like what a Muslim would say to defend their faith, so you're no different" it would've been a straw man, but you just being wrong and not liking it doesn't qualify. Now get busy, you've obviously got quite a LOT of definitions to learn.

  • @weslemens5963
    @weslemens5963 Місяць тому +40

    Debates like these are so important.

  • @Antyweszka
    @Antyweszka 17 днів тому

    If we are talking about CIRCLE not BALL, He is right💯

  • @duderyandude9515
    @duderyandude9515 7 місяців тому +19

    "You can't now move the goalposts, especially if you're still going to miss" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @gregorymoore2877
      @gregorymoore2877 7 місяців тому +1

      As a Christian, that was a pretty good line. I'm not sure what's up with Dinesh here. I thought he was supposed to be a believer? It's like he's throwing the debate on purpose.

  • @RosieRoserules
    @RosieRoserules 7 місяців тому +55

    This is the dude that was in court 4 weeks ago admitting he had zero evidence for his 2000 mules movie and now has to apologize for it remove it from distribution and is being sued for defamation from the people that he erroneously called mules

    • @scottythetrex5197
      @scottythetrex5197 7 місяців тому

      Trump won in 2020 .

    • @Lucasisonline2
      @Lucasisonline2 7 місяців тому

      Who??

    • @janeslater8004
      @janeslater8004 7 місяців тому

      ​@@Lucasisonline2not alex. The brown one dont know his name

    • @TiKallisti
      @TiKallisti 7 місяців тому +7

      @@Lucasisonline2 Dinesh D´Souza - the liar behind 2000 mules.

    • @Foulgaz3
      @Foulgaz3 7 місяців тому +1

      What is 2000 mules? Why would a movie need recalled on the basis of a lack of evidence?

  • @danielbriggz
    @danielbriggz 8 місяців тому +19

    Everytime I remember how I was so enamored and captured by the likes of D'Souza and JP, I am deeply ashamed at younger me

    • @kinoko5566
      @kinoko5566 8 місяців тому +5

      Don't be ashamed, were just glad you saw the bs

    • @theintelligentmilkjug944
      @theintelligentmilkjug944 8 місяців тому +2

      JP seems leagues above D'Souza in terms of intelligence. As a Christian I've never heard of D'Souza , but his defense of the Bible is laughable bad here.

    • @flynnoflenniken7402
      @flynnoflenniken7402 7 місяців тому +1

      I still enjoy listening to Peterson when he's talking about psychology. It's just when he steps into politics or religion I have to take some of what he says with a grain of salt. I still don't disagree with everything he says though, just some things.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      You fell for the low-rent skeptical semantics of online atheists, huh?

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

  • @Licosaurus
    @Licosaurus 5 днів тому

    I really wish people would remove their ego and prioritise coming to a conclusion rather than get embarrassed about getting something wrong

  • @masteroogway2853
    @masteroogway2853 7 місяців тому +7

    Alex has the best critiques, he eviscerates dumb arguments and respects strong ones

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 місяців тому

      You should remove your lips from Alex's ass and come up for air... Alex is simply your typical dime a dozen UA-cam atheist edgelord. Also, he dodged the question and deflected. He couldn't refute one argument, so he deflected to one he thought he could. Unfortunately Dinesh got rattled and handled it poorly, because if Dinesh would have stayed sharp, not fall for Alex's tactics, and pressed him on the original question, Alex would have come away looking rather foolish.

  • @oludave
    @oludave 2 місяці тому +17

    Alex is well articulated here and Dinesh was falling into the contextual trap. An underlying factor is that the Scriptures are '"spiritually discerned" and as much as logic may try to dissect each nuance, we will only discover with time, that we were off, and the Holy Writ is spot on.
    My simple take on this matter...
    3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day (Genesis Chapter 1)
    These are simple words in our context but they speak depth beyond our common grasp. I think the concept of "the day" was neither chronological nor depictive. In verses 3 to 5, seemingly personas were regarded as light and day, and later, on day 4, the talk shifted to sun and moon. All of these are preceded by the concept of the "first day," which was ordered as evening followed by morning.
    A better grasp suggests that Genesis 1 was a recreation in itself due to the "darkness covering the deep" in verse 2 which the Spirit of God brooded over to recrop the creation. This may be as a result of the rebellion of the fallen star. But again, these are excerpts here and there on our own means to interpret these.
    We know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when the full comes, we shall know as we are known.
    Great debate as Alex challenges the norm for the true Christian to search the deep things of the Spirit. We shall know the truth, and the truth shall make us free!

  • @lisakurak3733
    @lisakurak3733 7 місяців тому +51

    When the Bible mentions light, it doesn't necessarily mean our sun.

    • @juliagooliagiulia723
      @juliagooliagiulia723 7 місяців тому +6

      Exactly!!!!

    • @JB-ec1bo
      @JB-ec1bo 7 місяців тому +4

      What does it mean?

    • @hopisix8899
      @hopisix8899 7 місяців тому +16

      @@JB-ec1bo "The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp" (Revelation 21) ..this scripture is about the new earth in the future. It parallels Genesis. God was the light & he created the sun and moon later to mark signs & times. This transcends science..it's supernatural.

    • @korpscomacho
      @korpscomacho 7 місяців тому +19

      From genesis: And God made the two great lights-the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night-and the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness.
      Now are you really going to try to rationalise that this doesn't mean the sun and the moon? :)

    • @hopisix8899
      @hopisix8899 7 місяців тому +9

      @@korpscomacho That scripture was the 4th day. There was a source of light already in Genesis 1:3. No one in this section said verse 16 wasn't about the sun and the moon.

  • @vickymaaskant6784
    @vickymaaskant6784 27 днів тому +6

    This seems like a discussion i had with my grandparents when I was 15. I wrote an essay, "God is science itself". I wrote about how God is a spirit and spirit is energy, and then it materialised in a split second. The beginning is, therefore, the same in the bible as it in science, what we have found out until today, that our universe began with a big bang. That everything is time relative. Like what a one day fly is compared to a turtle, is like the 7 days of creating and the 7 periods (eras) we have known in our past.
    As a 15-year-old, I had no idea I was on to something called New Age. This videoclip takes me back to that moment. My grandparents read my article and were gobsmacked. I told them, "you see, you can really be interested in the dinosaurs of Frank (my younger cousin, who was then not even 10) and not put your religion into the discussion. It isn't necessary, as the bible is only a book of conclusions and thoughts of that time, of how it all started. It is a book of science, written in a way that most people at that time would accept it. Today, we only discovered that in one of those days of God's creation, there were dinosaurs."
    I had no idea I was combining science and theology in a way that was already done for 30 years, hahaha. But it really opened up my grandparents. Since then, we could talk about science and evolution theory. As I had told them, the bible does not rule out evolution at all, and science does not rule out that there is more than meets the eye. It's actually the foundation of science. In a way, of the modern civilisation at least, the bible was one of the first recorded historic writings with scientific elements of our origin. It writes that we humans weren't just put on earth. No, it took a process of 7 eras with one common energy. It is basically unbelievably accurate on the science time calendar (that if we see the beginning of our time, the start of our universe, as time 0, then the rise of the first humans is 5 minutes before the first hour). And thus, I find the bible an unbelievable imaginative book, that to me, is like as huge (bigger even, as it tries to describe everything), as the origin of species (Darwin), that goes into a deep dive of one topic of the bible, namely animals and their journey on Noah's Ark.
    I will look for the complete interview/ discussion. I find these existential talks so meaningful. ❤

    • @vincentvangogh8092
      @vincentvangogh8092 4 дні тому

      The Bible teaches that their was a first human called Adam which science can easily debunk Adam first sin is the whole crux of the christian religion without it you have nothing. No sensible person believes in any of the currently active religions have it as culture or art but as a belief system its obvious Bullcrap

  • @ryancook1078
    @ryancook1078 7 місяців тому +35

    “God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day.” Genesis 1:5

    • @thecelestialvoyager
      @thecelestialvoyager 7 місяців тому +3

      Literal is nonsense

    • @akiblue
      @akiblue 7 місяців тому

      Meanwhile:
      She lusted after lovers with genitals as large as a donkey’s and emissions like those of a horse.
      Ezekiel 23:20

    • @geewanraghoo1520
      @geewanraghoo1520 7 місяців тому +2

      U are correct! Sun before earth!@

    • @akiblue
      @akiblue 7 місяців тому +11

      And God created mankind. But he made a huge mistake, like omnipotent beings do sometimes, and instead of starting over when there were only two, he waited until they populated the earth with millions and then killed them all. But he knew it was going to happen, so either, it was that God is the dumbest omnipotent being there is, or that he's a sadist. The rest of the bible proves the second one is true.

    • @kaehlerfamily7251
      @kaehlerfamily7251 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@@akiblue​ it is a interesting take.
      But I'd like you to consider this. God has always been and always will be. He is outside of time. He knows all. He is love. He is creative. He brings justice. The bible says he is perfect essentially.
      When you have a child, do you want them to explore and come to you and love you because they want/choose to love you, or do you want them to be like robots with no choice? If God is love like the bible states, he wants us to choose him, he doesn't want something fake. No one can love you if they didnt have a choice, they would almost be like an inanimate object, there because you put them there. We were made in his image, to love and be loved by him.
      I believe he made us out of evey idea we can think of and even more than we can imagine. Out of all the possibilities we were chosen because I believe we are the best option, nothing but God can be perfect. If we were perfect we would not need God. And then what would be the point of God creating us? If his creation did what they want seperate from him?

  • @smadaf
    @smadaf 8 місяців тому +4

    LOL! This was uncommonly good!
    (Now I have to think of Mr. Kipling and his exceedingly good cakes.)

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @smadaf
      @smadaf 7 місяців тому +1

      @@maambomumba6123 , I suppose that you meant to comment on the video in general, not to reply to my comment.
      Still, now that I'm aware of your comment, I'll point one thing out: Genesis 1:14-19 _does_ say that God _made_ the sun, the moon, and the stars; and it places this _making_ on the fourth day. Your interpretation _is_ an interesting one; but it is an interpretation that reads into the text something that the text does not say. You began your comment by saying "The Genesis account of creation _doesn’t say_ the Sun was created after the Earth" (emphasis mine); the fact is that Genesis 1 puts the Earth there, formless and void, at the very beginning (verses 1 and 2), and waits until the third day has come and gone before it has God making the sun, the moon, and the stars. It _does_ do that. What it does _not_ do is say "And, on the fourth day, God took the _already existing_ sun and _moved_ it, from a place of invisibility, into _such a place that an observer on the surface of the Earth could see it."_

  • @photografr7
    @photografr7 3 місяці тому +8

    The Bible only “knows” what the writers of the Bible knew at the time it was written. I tried to explain that to my 5th grade teacher, who was Catholic, but she wouldn’t have it, so she sent me to the principal’s office as punishment.

    • @clay07770
      @clay07770 Місяць тому

      You have to presume God does not exist to come to that conclusion. 🤷‍♂️
      If there is a God, it would stand to reason He could reveal things as He sees fit. So once again, you assume what these people knew actually came from themselves.. Since you have an issue with the idea of God --- What if we are in a simulation, and the programmer decides at times to reveal things to His creation? Even things that seem impossible or improbable looking back billions of years -- which none of us can do.

    • @joestrat2723
      @joestrat2723 Місяць тому

      Every religion is rainbows and lollipops until you question it. Then the knives come out.

    • @photografr7
      @photografr7 Місяць тому

      @@clay07770 There is no God and never was.

    • @clay07770
      @clay07770 Місяць тому

      @@photografr7 And that is your belief.
      Your atheism never was, and never will be.....
      So, are you just as convinced as I was!?
      If existence is infinite, WHY NOT God!?
      If the universe is not infinite... Who did it? Because it doesn't even make sense to assume nothing did it, since nothing would have existed to make existence exist... ;)
      Creation is all around you.. To think it wasn't designed is stupid. Look around your room of manufactured things.. Do they come about by chance? Yet you are more infinitely complex than the phone you hold, and assume yourself to be the accident!? Only if your parents didn't mean to conceive, haha....
      Absurd to think life is an accident, knowing full well we are agents of creation ourselves, to think a far greater creator than we can imagine, exists.
      Atheism requires faith... Faith in nothing to conceive everything.

  • @JonBoy420
    @JonBoy420 Місяць тому +1

    Sun is 4.6 billion years old and earth is 4.5 billion years old. What if were off by a little? ❤

  • @dragonuv620
    @dragonuv620 8 місяців тому +24

    Alex is so open minded, even willing to talk with literal felons.

    • @TommyTombstone
      @TommyTombstone 8 місяців тому +4

      How forgiving and tolerant of the atheists.

    • @filipedias7284
      @filipedias7284 7 місяців тому

      Yo what happened

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      ahhh the snark, assery, and flippant unseriousness of Alex's audience.

    • @MrTHEMONEEMAKER
      @MrTHEMONEEMAKER 7 місяців тому +1

      Guy makes a donation and you make him sound like mugger

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      @@MrTHEMONEEMAKER Because the actual violent felons are 95% atheists... so they have to strawman to cover for the destruction their lack of morals produces.
      It's also a fallacy.
      A personal attack is not an argument.

  • @saranyarajendran5705
    @saranyarajendran5705 4 місяці тому +5

    Praise the Lord!! Immortal God dwells in an unapproachable light which no man can see;(1 Timothy 6:16) His name is Sun of righteousness;(Mal 4:2) Before the earth and the sun, the eternal light is there; All things were created by Him, and for Him;(Colo 1:16)

    • @gibbobux1033
      @gibbobux1033 2 місяці тому

      That's some bad fiction right here.

  • @DeadRoseBouquet
    @DeadRoseBouquet 5 місяців тому +6

    The awkward silence leading to stuttering was the funniest part

  • @angelagraves865
    @angelagraves865 Місяць тому

    🤣🤣🤣 I'd call that mental gymnastics, but that might be overstating it when dude flubs a somersault like that. 🤣

  • @myssadonno2759
    @myssadonno2759 7 місяців тому +87

    The face After the 'got that bit wrong' 😂

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +1

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @myssadonno2759
      @myssadonno2759 7 місяців тому +2

      @@maambomumba6123 so the light arrived before the Sun was visible? Where did the light Come from then?
      Also, that does not really conforme with this bit ''In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep''
      So it does seem the earth was created before light existed.
      Since ''let there be light'' Comes after.
      Are we Reading the same Book?

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому

      @@myssadonno2759 yes. It’s possible to see the light from a light source but not see the source itself.
      Genesis 1:2 “says darkness was upon the surface of the watery deep”. Evidently at this point, while the Sun had already been created, it’s light had not yet diffused through Earths atmosphere - hence the darkness. In the very next verse Genesis 1:3 says “let there be light”. It’s at this point in this creation epoch that light diffuses through the atmosphere of the Earth. But the Sun itself as the source of this light is not yet discernible. Only on the fourth creation day does the Sun itself become visible as the sky was evidently clear enough to see the Sun. That’s why Genesis 1:17 refers to “Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth”…describing how the Sun could now be seen by an observer on the Earths surface.

    • @myssadonno2759
      @myssadonno2759 7 місяців тому

      @@maambomumba6123 not for days or epoques. How long does it take for the suns light to get here?
      Also, do you believe they, the Sun and the earth, were created at the same Time? Or was one created before the other? You believe the earth is round right? So the source of the light would have been visible from half of the planet if there was already light when the earth was created...
      You also talked about it being the description of an observer, like a physical one?

    • @WhoThisMonkey
      @WhoThisMonkey 7 місяців тому +1

      Genuinely the mental gymnastics some people attempt to pull off, when trying to defend absurdities, never ceases to astound me.

  • @Joelsie1988
    @Joelsie1988 7 місяців тому +20

    The problem when the debater of the Bible doesn’t truly believe the Bible is perfect. Shame

    • @gardenandcalico
      @gardenandcalico 7 місяців тому +3

      when yall are completely delusional, it does not look any better to the rest of us than this.

    • @bennin9455
      @bennin9455 7 місяців тому

      ​@@gardenandcalico watch how you talk about religion shit face. If let's say we are delusional you are as well believing also theory science is not 100% true like your dumbass thinks

    • @schalazeal07
      @schalazeal07 7 місяців тому

      It's a shame that people are so sure of knowing about something they're not even sure of having really thought about and fact-checked.

    • @LetterToGodFromMeToYou
      @LetterToGodFromMeToYou 7 місяців тому +6

      If the Bible were perfect, it wouldn't have to contradict itself.

    • @jackieruiz2348
      @jackieruiz2348 7 місяців тому

      How so?
      ​@@LetterToGodFromMeToYou

  • @mtomic87
    @mtomic87 8 місяців тому +21

    You should be charged with three or four counts of aggravated assault with a deadly one-liner.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 місяців тому

      one-liners are his brand more than actual reason

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 місяців тому +3

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue one-liners can be reasonable or unreasonable, there is no correlation. in this case, his one-liners were completely reasonable, and you have to rebut them with reason, not by calling them one-liners

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +1

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

  • @hanZoul8
    @hanZoul8 6 днів тому

    I pray you all find God someday, makes me sad to see so many lost souls

  • @bennettdeneghuedoeshits2950
    @bennettdeneghuedoeshits2950 7 місяців тому +162

    Once you pull the thread, it all unravels.

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 місяців тому +5

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @andrewdouglas1963
      @andrewdouglas1963 7 місяців тому +3

      The bible doesn't say the earth was created before the sun.
      And despite that, different cultures have different ways of listing things.
      For example in English, we would say "my eyes are blue" but in French they change the order to "blue are my eyes".
      Ancient cultures may have had different priorities for listing things.

    • @SuperNictastic
      @SuperNictastic 7 місяців тому +1

      @@andrewdouglas1963 LOL. Keep digging.

    • @andrewdouglas1963
      @andrewdouglas1963 7 місяців тому +1

      @@SuperNictastic
      ???
      Maybe this is too educationally advanced for you.

    • @TaylorL3
      @TaylorL3 7 місяців тому +1

      @@maambomumba6123 i’m trying to wrap my head around this too, so I’m an honest observer, but I would challenge you by saying, the genesis account is supposed to be the telling of things given by God. Do you believe that? If you believe that, I don’t think you can take the liberties you took in your answer above.