Someone please help me out here. So par value is a.k.a. face value, principle value, or future value or what? And then is the par yield same as a rate (coupon rate?) that makes the sum of cash flows equal to face value? Or is the par yield analogous to IRR- the rate that makes NPV equal to zero?
1. Par value and principle value is the same. 2. Par yield is a hypothetical coupon rate that makes the sum of the PRESENT cash flows equal to face value. 3. I don't think par yield is analogous to IRR. We are using different spot rates for different coupons here.
I still don't get it....from what I can tell by the words alone, you are saying that the par rate is better, but how is getting less money better? You are paying $100 for a coupon to get some of that money back per year and in-so-doing you get less interest on the rate of the reserved note and then you get the "original" back but you multiplied it by the anum, which is a reduction of the actual put forward....all-in-all, it's less than you would have gotten just having a CD go full to end because of exponentiation. I know I'm dumb when it comes to bonds, they are a wildly retarded setup to be honest for markets and could easily have a much more intuitive design...but they went with this weird par and yield garbage that just confuses everyone. Plus, I make 40% per year average over the last 20+ years on the stock market, so I've never seen a reason to enter the realm of bonds that are going for less than 3% majority of the time. Yes, I do beat the market, consistently, because I employ several mathematically sound strategies...and yes, it isn't sustainable longterm, eventually I'll reach a point where I can't possibly take on more risk to unload it fast enough, so it'll eventually teeter to market rates, but that's when/if I ever reach about $3m+ in capital (I tend to spend my money when I get it).
Nice! Hope you keep posting more videos again 👍
Thank you for the support!
Thank you, is that rate nominal or effective?
Great lecture, thanks!
Super video! It was very well explained :)
8:57 -> why par rates are the best in Bionic Turtle's View
Someone please help me out here. So par value is a.k.a. face value, principle value, or future value or what?
And then is the par yield same as a rate (coupon rate?) that makes the sum of cash flows equal to face value?
Or is the par yield analogous to IRR- the rate that makes NPV equal to zero?
1. Par value and principle value is the same. 2. Par yield is a hypothetical coupon rate that makes the sum of the PRESENT cash flows equal to face value. 3. I don't think par yield is analogous to IRR. We are using different spot rates for different coupons here.
Great Explanation!
I still don't get it....from what I can tell by the words alone, you are saying that the par rate is better, but how is getting less money better? You are paying $100 for a coupon to get some of that money back per year and in-so-doing you get less interest on the rate of the reserved note and then you get the "original" back but you multiplied it by the anum, which is a reduction of the actual put forward....all-in-all, it's less than you would have gotten just having a CD go full to end because of exponentiation.
I know I'm dumb when it comes to bonds, they are a wildly retarded setup to be honest for markets and could easily have a much more intuitive design...but they went with this weird par and yield garbage that just confuses everyone. Plus, I make 40% per year average over the last 20+ years on the stock market, so I've never seen a reason to enter the realm of bonds that are going for less than 3% majority of the time. Yes, I do beat the market, consistently, because I employ several mathematically sound strategies...and yes, it isn't sustainable longterm, eventually I'll reach a point where I can't possibly take on more risk to unload it fast enough, so it'll eventually teeter to market rates, but that's when/if I ever reach about $3m+ in capital (I tend to spend my money when I get it).
🍀 քʀօʍօֆʍ