I think mind is Spiritual Energy in it ultimate motion and matter is Spiritual Energy slow down and light appear. Consciousness is part of Spirit ual Energy that is infinite. And we are it's fragments that never die........
Mind is what your body and brain produce while they are processing information from outside and inside, our bodies. When we die, (like the dynamo that stops spinning,) our body stops producing consciousness/mind.
Planck’s view of a ‘Divine Mind’ behind the universe is intriguing. If the fundamental reality is consciousness, as he suggested, does that mean science and spirituality are converging on the same truth?
In science, especially in quantum mechanics, there’s a growing recognition that observation plays a crucial role in determining reality, which some interpret as a bridge between consciousness and the material world. Spirituality, on the other hand, has long posited that consciousness is the underlying force shaping our existence. Is consciousness the observation of reality?
Great point! But do you think human perception limits our understanding, or could it be a key to tapping into those infinite and continuous energies in unique ways?
I believe that our ancient origins were very much aware of the inter-connectivity of all living things, to a higher, collective consciousness, in existence before us, and in existence long after. As we have progressively estranged ourselves from nature, laying down borders that uphold an "us and them" mentality - between nations as well as the landscape from which we lived and inhabited in a deeply profound way with all other living beings. Now we have nearly lost all intimate connection to each other and the collective consciousness between us all. As superior as we think we are today to past times, we lose evermore presence and our place in the context of a combined, universal consciousness that has always been in the Universe. We are strangers and ghosts, losing our long entwined string connecting us - like losing grip of a balloon & watching in despair as it floats away, with nothing to be done about it, and no going back.
यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप से हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप से हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
@@SharonCorbett यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप में हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
Skousen’s idea suggests that intelligence is inherent in all matter, implying that everything, from particles to galaxies, has some form of awareness. This aligns with panpsychism, where consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality. It would mean the universe is more interconnected and purposeful than just a mechanical system.
"Now he has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That signifies nothing. For those of us who believe in physics, the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.".-- Albert Einstein
Einstein's words challenge the notion of linear time, suggesting that past, present, and future are mere constructs of perception. In the realm of physics, time is fluid, not absolute-an illusion we cling to, but one that is ultimately shaped by the observer. Time's true nature transcends our conventional understanding.
does that imply it's a subjective experience unique to each individual, or is there an underlying shared reality that we are all tapping into in different ways?
It’s a shared experience viewed through the lens of everything…… we all experience conscious at the pinch point of an hour glass where the whole past has passed through you and the future and all it’s potential is streaming through…….the future and past is universal but the moment at the pinch points is yours
If experience and consciousness are inevitable, does that mean they are simply natural expressions of the universe, unfolding as they must, or is there a deeper purpose behind their emergence?
@@Spiritual-Quest what i mean is that being or not being are two aspects of the same reality, just like having a purpose is a limited way of seeing, purpose of life of life is life itself
Whatever this is that is going on, once there are awareness, it is aware that is aware, then it is aware that is aware that it is aware, to me that is the building blocks of reality, consciousness is awareness of itself, I'm not talking about just in the level of the human experience, the mutual interdependence of all events of reality, consciousness is the dual condition for experiencing itself
@@Spiritual-Quest i could say it is pure inteligence, awareness or consciusness i could say that they are qualities or abilities in a sense, inteligence creates a possibility of existence of consciouss experiece
ThePlanck is referring to “information” stored in a quantum particle. He is referring to the trade off of precision information (I.e. a specific “quantum state) versus the act of observing the “ field of possible quantum states. He conflates the meaning of “quantum information state” with the popular term “consciousness”. But only living organisms have “conscious” in the popular definition of the term.
You're right to highlight the distinction between "quantum information" and "consciousness." Planck’s work refers to the fundamental "quantum state" and how the act of observation impacts that state, but he wasn't directly talking about "consciousness" as we typically understand it in living organisms. Consciousness, in the popular sense, implies subjective experience, which is not necessarily tied to the quantum state or the information contained within it. Planck’s ideas around quantum mechanics focus more on the interaction between the observer and the observed, while consciousness is a complex, emergent property of biological systems. What are your thoughts on how quantum states relate to the mind, if they do at all?
You think? 1st mistake consciousness is not a thing - consciousness is an interaction. 2nd mistake Planck/Schrödinger and others ignored that it requires a body interacting with brain that produces our consciousness/mind. 3rd mistake only when matter achieves the biological world is there any need for consciousness in any event
@@Prestige21-j1l You would have to explain (and defend) to me where and what. What I'm talking about is using the full scope of Earth science, biology, evolution knowledge to build your interpretive frame of reference out of. Philosophy, religion, only offer mind games, story telling, emotional support and intellectual entertainment. But all that belong to the realm of our thoughts. I'm talking about a pragmatic appreciation for life on Earth based on the evidence at hand. The cosmos created this unique Earth, This Earth created life and life created consciousness. It's actually amazingly cool and straightforward, as nature tends to be. Best wishes
@@johnh7411 Well that's an interesting egg/chicken conundrum. Guess I start by pointing out, logic isn't always your friend. Have you spent much learning about earliest evolution and the transition from passive eaters, to predator/pray and the dawn of eco-systems. How does a sack of life that has to interact with an outside environment function without a level of awareness? Please ponder, How do the constituents of matter, or the rules it follows, need consciousness to function? (remember awareness to consciousness is on a spectrum, not one size fits all.)
It’s amazing to think of each moment or thought as its own boundless universe. What inspired this perspective? I like to think every atom, every cell in our body has its own consciousness, but we dont fully understand how they operate at the "consciouss" level.
Jane Roberts' work on The Nature of Personal Reality is truly profound! Do you think her insights about consciousness as a creative force could reshape how we view reality itself?
If you don't mind , it don't matter The kogi tribe has a documentary called aluna In the beginning was nothing, darkness only the mother The mother began to think and then to weave a gold thread and we were all woven into the story Then light came and everything becomes real
We as the human race are projectionist in all things did you ever call upon a being and place a mindset of vibrations or thought of a ball lightning energy in all things that is around us micro in its natural state and can expand its density to the viewers ❤
That's such a fascinating perspective! I love how you tied together the concepts of vibration, energy, and perception. It’s amazing to think about how much of what we experience is a reflection of our own energy. Have you ever tried specific practices to connect with this micro-vibration state, or noticed any profound shifts when focusing your thoughts in this way? ❤
There is absolutely nothing mysterious in CONSCIOUSNESS as some entity different from MATTER. It corresponds to the PARTICLES in what we call "our minds", with which we make calculations, viz. the DIGITS ~ at present just 10 of them: 0...9, but many more once particle physically established. Its mysteriousness lies in the fact that our current PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY have absolutely no idea as to what type of particles they are (quarks, leptons, bosons, protons, neutrons, electrons or any other). Neither have these 2 fundamental sciences any particle physical interpretation of what particle interactions correspond to feelings (hunger, fear, pain, etc.) in beings (ANIMALS and HUMANS). Because of this lack of relevance of our system of knowledge (Periodic Table and Standard Model) to life function, we are unable to interpret the effects of our thoughts on the solid, liquid and gaseous (= stool, urine, exhaled air, etc.) substances we release to the environment. But once we derive the particle physical model of how interactions in our body among the solid, liquid and gaseous inputs (food including all liquids, inhaled air and sense data) result in relevant output that influence the vegetation, we'd be able to program the way how the interior of the earth functions to develop PLANTS on its own surface, to then deliver and sustain both types of living beings (ANIMALS and HUMANS) here through them. Thus what we call consciousness is the interactions inside our body that process the inputs to prepare the outputs individually. But their resultant effect on VEGETATION is processed inside the CoTE (Core of The Earth) unifyingly ~ PROBABILISTICALLY at present, but DESTINISTICALLY (= deterministic negative PREVENTION and individually free positive PERPETUATION) once the above mentioned mathematical model is derived. Sum total of interactions in all the beings on the surface of the earth (ANIMALS and HUMANS) = Resultant interactions inside the CoTE mediated by the VEGETATION. Note: PLANTS only serve sustenance of life, but are themselves not LIVING BEINGS (characterized by the ability to feel ~ hunger, fear, pain and move independent of the soil to SELECT their own inputs). Both types of living beings are PERMANENT ENTITIES with permanent particle physical SOULS, while PLANTS are only TRANSIENT (impermanent) entities. Current incompatibility of QM and Relativity can only be solved by such a mathematical model that derives development and growth of PLANTS as functions of interactions among the 6 types of particles corresponding to the 6 types of sense perceptions in both types of beings (with BREATHING as the 6th. COMMON sense ~ common to the 3 entities: PLANTS, ANIMALS and HUMANS). Current euphoria about Bohr's probabilistic model overriding Einstein's deterministic model (with many Nobel prizes to boot) is a totally misguided, fatalistically destructive one. Knowledge is necessary ONLY to PREVENT EVIL, and SHOULD be deterministically certain. Hence, Einstein's stubborn stand would finally prove accurate for sustenance of life. But information collection for EVIL FREE positive activities (preparation of maps and time tables) must remain restriction free, hence probabilistic. The conflict arises due to lack of separation of PREVENTION OF EVIL, only for which collective knowledge is necrssary, from individual collection of information for evil free positive purposes. Thus the sole purpose cum the only croterion of proof of all knowledge should be: PRACTICAL SUSTENANCE OF EVIL FREE LIFE ON THIS EARTH. EVIL, thereby, is defined exhaustively as DISASTERS (earthquakes, volcanos, floods, droughts, storms, accidents), PREDATION (human and animal), DISEASES (including all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence) and DEATH.
was indeed a deeply philosophical person, but he was not a Lutheran pastor. However, his personal life was marked by tragedy. Planck was married twice, and both of his first wife and his children died in tragic circumstances. His first wife passed away relatively young, and later, two of his children died, one during World War I and another under difficult circumstances. Despite these personal losses, Planck remained dedicated to his scientific work.
Unperceived dimensions of existence which we are tied to coming into the influence of the masters, the unaware, or the unlearned. Matter, energy, and Spirit make up the universe. Book of Udo
"Could the unperceived dimensions of existence reveal deeper truths about the connection between matter, energy, and spirit? How does our awareness-or lack of it-shape our understanding of the universe's true nature?"
@Spiritual-Quest As I believe, these dimensions are the heavens. Jesus Christ came to reunite that which was once a singular state of being, but had become seperated at some time, some past age that we philosophers and theologians attempt to put words to which help us keep our focus on in a material world of change. There is nothing new under the sun. What has been before will be again. And since Christ came, He offers everyone who follows His teachings a way back into this once lost idyllic state, though temporarily for now. A Greek word used for who Jesus Christ is in the Scriptures is "Thura". Which means a doorway, or a gateway, or a portal in which one can go through into another place. Another reality. It is, in my belief this is describing the Kingdom of the heavens.
No, sorry. Panpsychism is a typical misunderstanding that comes from somehow trying to preserve the inherent existence of matter. Mystics of all traditions have the answer to this, but typically do not use words to convey this understanding. This understanding starts, where words end.
Panpsychism tries to retain the concept of matter as inherently conscious, which can be limiting when trying to understand the true nature of reality. Mystics often point to the ineffable nature of reality, suggesting that direct experience, beyond conceptual frameworks and words, offers a deeper understanding. It's a realization that words can’t fully capture, and that’s where true insight begins. Would you say that the essence of consciousness is something beyond both matter and mind, a state that words are incapable of conveying?
@ Yes, this is what I am trying to say (but even the word ‚beyond‘ is a word coined by a deeply embedded space-time paradigm, so not really expressing what I want to express).
People can pretend their mind or minds are wondrously connected to everything and a sort of universe in itself but when all their super-celebrated "knowledge" allows them to destroy all that lives they will do it and there will be no mind anywhere no matter how far into the universe you think your consciousness goes.
If the mind's potential is wasted on destruction, does that mean true knowledge must come with responsibility? How do we align this 'universal consciousness' with actions that preserve rather than destroy?
@@Spiritual-Quest truth and responsibility are two very different things, one being an actuality, the other being a supposition or apparent inference or a notion, something like that. Responsibility can be a choice, truth is despite choice.
Oh yes so do I have the same idea of telloric current position of these tiny but super position energy in all the universe itself is a factor of the micro to the unseen biological clock of timelines
Everything is made of the same stuff so why in the universe would not everything be conscious? It would be so weird if it were different completely unexplainable. Even that our thoughts have some influence on our reality seems not some great scientific discovery but common sense.
You're touching on a fascinating point! The idea that everything is made of the same fundamental "stuff" hints at the potential interconnectedness of consciousness throughout the universe. If everything originates from the same source, it does seem plausible that some form of consciousness or awareness could be inherent in all things. This is very much aligned with ideas from both quantum physics and various spiritual traditions, where consciousness is seen as an intrinsic part of reality rather than something separate or exclusive to humans. The concept of our thoughts influencing reality might seem intuitive once we consider how interconnected everything is. After all, our perceptions shape our actions, and our actions, in turn, create the world around us. It’s as though our consciousness is in constant dialogue with the universe. Does this perspective resonate with your view of reality?
The ancient Taoists called it yin and yang . i.e. Consciousness and Light . The tai chi symbol describes this , the tai chi symbol is NOT the symbol of Duality as in right and wrong etc etc. study ancient Taoism. They knew existence before the silly big bang theory .good luck ❤️🍀
The Taoist view suggests that opposites exist in harmony and are complementary forces, just like consciousness and energy, flowing together as one unified whole. They saw existence as a continuous flow, well before modern scientific theories like the Big Bang. It’s fascinating how ancient wisdom aligns with contemporary discoveries! 🌱✨
From the formless God without attributes ie Nirgun Brahm came the Sound Onkar ie Sargun Brahm, Onkar is basic vibration which gave rise to consciousness, the consciousness projection is the World we see around us , the only reality is God the Nirgun Brahm rest everything is an illusion. Search within yourself with devotion and love and truth will be revealed.
If the world is a projection of consciousness, can we truly experience it without understanding the source? What might happen if we searched within with the same devotion and love you speak of?
Same old, If I can't understand it, it must be god. I'll stick with cause and effect until they really understand Quantum Physics. When they're certain, I'll re-evaluate. Skepticism is a good thing.
Absolutely, skepticism keeps us curious and grounded. Quantum physics does open doors to fascinating possibilities though... what’s your favorite theory so far?
although I can accept "philosophical idealism" , I don't think the collapse of the wave function proves this, nor indicates that the observation has an effect. I just believe it's a misunderstanding of the basic process of observation and probability. It makes more sense that like shrodingers cat, we just don't "know" until it's observed. rather than the act of observation alters the outcome.
Actually, three scientists won the Noble prize in 2022 proving that Schrodinger (and hence The Vedantic Philosphy is right) - the universe is locally unreal! It is merely a projection of our consciousness.
The collapse of the wave function could be seen more as a result of our lack of knowledge rather than the observer actively influencing the outcome. In that sense, the observation doesn't alter reality, but simply reveals one of the many possibilities. It aligns with the idea that we don’t fully understand the underlying nature of the system until it's measured, but that doesn't necessarily mean observation is a causal factor. Would this mean that reality exists in a superposition of possibilities, only becoming concrete upon measurement?
No need for the God-smuggling, I'm sure Planck held religious beliefs in some form like nearly everyone born in the 19th century, but there is absolutely zero divinity necessary to panpsychism. I've considered matter and energy to be a subset of consciousness since I first became interested in philosophy as a teenager, and not once has divinity had anything to do with it. It just makes way more sense for experience to be the fundamental substance of existence, with matter/energy not some different substance, but discrete bundles to conceptually break existence down into something that we can model.
Interesting perspective! But if experience is the fundamental substance, how do you account for the apparent emergence of consciousness in complex systems like brains? Could there be layers to existence that we’re not yet modeling fully?
@@Spiritual-Quest Brains are just another example of these "discrete bundles" of experience that I mentioned. Any identifiable "thing" is like we got some scissors and conceptually cut out a section of experience, just so that we could mentally model it against other discrete "things" in some kind of mechanistic system. Divide it up further for a more complex model and we start dealing with abstractions like matter and energy, but it's all fundamentally a continuity of experience that we started from. Everything is a subset of that. So it's not consciousness that emerges from brains, but brains that emerge from consciousness. There could most definitely be layers to existence that we're not yet modelling fully - for one, the way in which we conceptually divide up experience into something we can quantise and measure could potentially be done differently. But moreso than that, consciousness itself is fluid and could potentially take on any kind of form that we've not experienced before. From our experience of memory though, it seems unlikely it'll *completely* overturn our conceptual modelling - science seems to have come up with such versatile and resilient modelling so far - but new experiences always seem to be throwing us new things to consider, making science a practice of growth that's constantly subject to slight revisions.
His discovery changed everything. This is where we are today. Consciousness is everything.. It's power is causal in everything.
Do you think we will ever truly understand what consciousness truly means???
“What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind
That, my friend, is pure poetry ❤
I think mind is Spiritual Energy in it ultimate motion and matter is Spiritual Energy slow down and light appear. Consciousness is part of Spirit ual Energy that is infinite. And we are it's fragments that never die........
Quantum waves my friend. Read Schrodinger's Universe by Milo Wolff
Mind is what your body and brain produce while they are processing information from outside and inside, our bodies. When we die, (like the dynamo that stops spinning,) our body stops producing consciousness/mind.
Yes the Mind I.S. divine, Infinity Squared, as an Excellent poetry formations. Thank you 010
These are real celebrities ❤
"Consciousness is the canvas on which the material universe is painted " Schrodinger.
" Consciousness is the canvas on which we paint the universe according to our unique purposes. " A. Longo
This statement is by yoga vasishta
No, you are wrong
Yes he is right it is already in Hindu scripture more than 3k years old known as yoga vashishta maharamayan
Could it be that consciousness is the program, on which we are the players?
Planck’s view of a ‘Divine Mind’ behind the universe is intriguing. If the fundamental reality is consciousness, as he suggested, does that mean science and spirituality are converging on the same truth?
Yes
Correct. Mind over matter? mind is matter.
A good point, perhaps thats exactly what happens.
In science, especially in quantum mechanics, there’s a growing recognition that observation plays a crucial role in determining reality, which some interpret as a bridge between consciousness and the material world. Spirituality, on the other hand, has long posited that consciousness is the underlying force shaping our existence. Is consciousness the observation of reality?
Let there be light!
Long live Planck universe long live
Lets do 60 second plancks in his honor
👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EXCELLENT WORK I LOOK FORWARD TO NEW VIDEOS! THANK YOU
You are the best!
Great truth. God bless❤🙏
यह आवृति और अवस्था हैं जिसका आप मानवीय संवेदनाओं से अवलोकन करते हो पर सिर्फ ऊर्जा का व्यक्त होना है वह अनंत और निरंतर हैं ।
Great point! But do you think human perception limits our understanding, or could it be a key to tapping into those infinite and continuous energies in unique ways?
I believe that our ancient origins were very much aware of the inter-connectivity of all living things, to a higher, collective consciousness, in existence before us, and in existence long after. As we have progressively estranged ourselves from nature, laying down borders that uphold an "us and them" mentality - between nations as well as the landscape from which we lived and inhabited in a deeply profound way with all other living beings. Now we have nearly lost all intimate connection to each other and the collective consciousness between us all. As superior as we think we are today to past times, we lose evermore presence and our place in the context of a combined, universal consciousness that has always been in the Universe. We are strangers and ghosts, losing our long entwined string connecting us - like losing grip of a balloon & watching in despair as it floats away, with nothing to be done about it, and no going back.
यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप से हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप से हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
@@SharonCorbett यह सिर्फ़ वर्तमान में अज्ञानता के कारण धारणा है अगर आप ईस वक्तव्य का अर्थ समझो तो ऊर्जा के दोरों के विजातीय छोरों का स्पंदन ही ऊर्जा को अव्यक्त से व्यक्त करता हैं और वहीं ऊर्जा को हम या अन्य जीव अपनी संवेदना से खुद अवलोकन या धारणा करते हैं जैसे हम ध्वनि का बोलने और सुनने के लिये वैसे प्रकाश का देखने व स्वयंम को व्यक्त करने। ऊन दोरों की अनंत और निरंतर स्पंदन से ऊर्जा के स्वरूप में हम सब जुड़े हैं ।
Wonderful thank you
Author W. Cleon Skousen put forth the concept of intelligence paired with each particle of matter
Skousen’s idea suggests that intelligence is inherent in all matter, implying that everything, from particles to galaxies, has some form of awareness. This aligns with panpsychism, where consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality. It would mean the universe is more interconnected and purposeful than just a mechanical system.
"Now he has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That signifies nothing. For those of us who believe in physics, the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.".-- Albert Einstein
Einstein's words challenge the notion of linear time, suggesting that past, present, and future are mere constructs of perception. In the realm of physics, time is fluid, not absolute-an illusion we cling to, but one that is ultimately shaped by the observer. Time's true nature transcends our conventional understanding.
Consciousness is in the eye of the beholder
does that imply it's a subjective experience unique to each individual, or is there an underlying shared reality that we are all tapping into in different ways?
It’s a shared experience viewed through the lens of everything…… we all experience conscious at the pinch point of an hour glass where the whole past has passed through you and the future and all it’s potential is streaming through…….the future and past is universal but the moment at the pinch points is yours
@@jonnygemmel2243 Do you think we can change the past by alligning our present towards a different vibration?
I hope so…. I believe that is part of what it is to be a seeker
Love this
I would say that experience, consciousness, everything, is inevitable
If experience and consciousness are inevitable, does that mean they are simply natural expressions of the universe, unfolding as they must, or is there a deeper purpose behind their emergence?
@@Spiritual-Quest what i mean is that being or not being are two aspects of the same reality, just like having a purpose is a limited way of seeing, purpose of life of life is life itself
Whatever this is that is going on, once there are awareness, it is aware that is aware, then it is aware that is aware that it is aware, to me that is the building blocks of reality, consciousness is awareness of itself, I'm not talking about just in the level of the human experience, the mutual interdependence of all events of reality, consciousness is the dual condition for experiencing itself
@@Spiritual-Quest i could say it is pure inteligence, awareness or consciusness i could say that they are qualities or abilities in a sense, inteligence creates a possibility of existence of consciouss experiece
ThePlanck is referring to “information” stored in a quantum particle.
He is referring to the trade off of precision information (I.e. a specific “quantum state) versus the act of observing the “ field of possible quantum states.
He conflates the meaning of “quantum information state” with the popular term “consciousness”.
But only living organisms have “conscious” in the popular definition of the term.
How do you know that?
You're right to highlight the distinction between "quantum information" and "consciousness." Planck’s work refers to the fundamental "quantum state" and how the act of observation impacts that state, but he wasn't directly talking about "consciousness" as we typically understand it in living organisms. Consciousness, in the popular sense, implies subjective experience, which is not necessarily tied to the quantum state or the information contained within it.
Planck’s ideas around quantum mechanics focus more on the interaction between the observer and the observed, while consciousness is a complex, emergent property of biological systems.
What are your thoughts on how quantum states relate to the mind, if they do at all?
Nothing is separate.
Are we all ONE? Or we are just connected but "divided"?
Suggesting the KYBALION Hermetic Philosophy.
I’m beginning to believe this. Aging is mind over matter, if you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter
Consciousness is more fundamental than time and space.
Does time and space operate within the fabric of consciousness??
So it's as if when we choose it slows us down into matter.
In the beginning God said let there be Light. ❤
What do you mean by that?
He was right
You think?
1st mistake consciousness is not a thing - consciousness is an interaction.
2nd mistake Planck/Schrödinger and others ignored that it requires a body interacting with brain that produces our consciousness/mind.
3rd mistake only when matter achieves the biological world is there any need for consciousness in any event
@ is there any chance that you could be wrong too?
@@Prestige21-j1l You would have to explain (and defend) to me where and what. What I'm talking about is using the full scope of Earth science, biology, evolution knowledge to build your interpretive frame of reference out of.
Philosophy, religion, only offer mind games, story telling, emotional support and intellectual entertainment. But all that belong to the realm of our thoughts.
I'm talking about a pragmatic appreciation for life on Earth based on the evidence at hand.
The cosmos created this unique Earth,
This Earth created life and
life created consciousness.
It's actually amazingly cool and straightforward, as nature tends to be.
Best wishes
@@petermiesler9452
“Need for consciousness”? How can there be a need for anything without consciousness? Only a conscious being ever needs anything.
@@johnh7411 Well that's an interesting egg/chicken conundrum. Guess I start by pointing out, logic isn't always your friend. Have you spent much learning about earliest evolution and the transition from passive eaters, to predator/pray and the dawn of eco-systems.
How does a sack of life that has to interact with an outside environment function without a level of awareness?
Please ponder,
How do the constituents of matter, or the rules it follows, need consciousness to function?
(remember awareness to consciousness is on a spectrum, not one size fits all.)
Namaste! That’s what they meant, long ago .
I have long believed this
You are not alone :), and that is the purpose of this channel
Yes
Yes INDEED
Perhaps each conciseness, is in it's own, a Universe?
It’s amazing to think of each moment or thought as its own boundless universe. What inspired this perspective? I like to think every atom, every cell in our body has its own consciousness, but we dont fully understand how they operate at the "consciouss" level.
Maybe??)
Science and spirituality are not separate realities.
Does "reality" changes in each individual mind?
❤❤
JANE ROBERTS consciousness the nature of personal reality
Jane Roberts' work on The Nature of Personal Reality is truly profound! Do you think her insights about consciousness as a creative force could reshape how we view reality itself?
Here we can't Do 5min plank.. And He was Plank his whole life
(What a Joke)
Particles are a result of wave interactions.
Particles are the result of the observation of wave interactions
@@Spiritual-Quest And that observation would be by systems made of particles aka waves. So the observation is a wave interaction.
If you don't mind , it don't matter
The kogi tribe has a documentary called aluna
In the beginning was nothing, darkness only the mother
The mother began to think and then to weave a gold thread and we were all woven into the story
Then light came and everything becomes real
If a tree falls in the forrest but no one saw it... did it really fall??
We as the human race are projectionist in all things did you ever call upon a being and place a mindset of vibrations or thought of a ball lightning energy in all things that is around us micro in its natural state and can expand its density to the viewers ❤
That's such a fascinating perspective! I love how you tied together the concepts of vibration, energy, and perception. It’s amazing to think about how much of what we experience is a reflection of our own energy. Have you ever tried specific practices to connect with this micro-vibration state, or noticed any profound shifts when focusing your thoughts in this way? ❤
the giant "subtitles" are very distracting
It is for my watchers outside the US. Sorry for the inconvenience
I have created living beings around me for a few times
What do you mean by creating living beings? Is it through a deep mental or spiritual process, or are you referring to something else entirely?
@@Spiritual-Quest I can't speak about but it's truth
@@Spiritual-Quest thanks for you kind question.
@@joaquimmanuelpereirafernan9655 Now Im intrigued... good luck in your path my friend
Life in 010 in T.E.N. dimensions.
It exists because it is seen.
And once it is seen, does it change its existence???
There is absolutely nothing mysterious in CONSCIOUSNESS as some entity different from MATTER.
It corresponds to the PARTICLES in what we call "our minds", with which we make calculations, viz. the DIGITS ~ at present just 10 of them: 0...9, but many more once particle physically established.
Its mysteriousness lies in the fact that our current PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY have absolutely no idea as to what type of particles they are (quarks, leptons, bosons, protons, neutrons, electrons or any other).
Neither have these 2 fundamental sciences any particle physical interpretation of what particle interactions correspond to feelings (hunger, fear, pain, etc.) in beings (ANIMALS and HUMANS).
Because of this lack of relevance of our system of knowledge (Periodic Table and Standard Model) to life function, we are unable to interpret the effects of our thoughts on the solid, liquid and gaseous (= stool, urine, exhaled air, etc.) substances we release to the environment.
But once we derive the particle physical model of how interactions in our body among the solid, liquid and gaseous inputs (food including all liquids, inhaled air and sense data) result in relevant output that influence the vegetation, we'd be able to program the way how the interior of the earth functions to develop PLANTS on its own surface, to then deliver and sustain both types of living beings (ANIMALS and HUMANS) here through them.
Thus what we call consciousness is the interactions inside our body that process the inputs to prepare the outputs individually.
But their resultant effect on VEGETATION is processed inside the CoTE (Core of The Earth) unifyingly ~ PROBABILISTICALLY at present, but DESTINISTICALLY (= deterministic negative PREVENTION and individually free positive PERPETUATION) once the above mentioned mathematical model is derived.
Sum total of interactions in all the beings on the surface of the earth (ANIMALS and HUMANS) = Resultant interactions inside the CoTE mediated by the VEGETATION.
Note: PLANTS only serve sustenance of life, but are themselves not LIVING BEINGS (characterized by the ability to feel ~ hunger, fear, pain and move independent of the soil to SELECT their own inputs). Both types of living beings are PERMANENT ENTITIES with permanent particle physical SOULS, while PLANTS are only TRANSIENT (impermanent) entities.
Current incompatibility of QM and Relativity can only be solved by such a mathematical model that derives development and growth of PLANTS as functions of interactions among the 6 types of particles corresponding to the 6 types of sense perceptions in both types of beings (with BREATHING as the 6th. COMMON sense ~ common to the 3 entities: PLANTS, ANIMALS and HUMANS).
Current euphoria about Bohr's probabilistic model overriding Einstein's deterministic model (with many Nobel prizes to boot) is a totally misguided, fatalistically destructive one.
Knowledge is necessary ONLY to PREVENT EVIL, and SHOULD be deterministically certain. Hence, Einstein's stubborn stand would finally prove accurate for sustenance of life.
But information collection for EVIL FREE positive activities (preparation of maps and time tables) must remain restriction free, hence probabilistic.
The conflict arises due to lack of separation of PREVENTION OF EVIL, only for which collective knowledge is necrssary, from individual collection of information for evil free positive purposes.
Thus the sole purpose cum the only croterion of proof of all knowledge should be:
PRACTICAL SUSTENANCE OF EVIL FREE LIFE ON THIS EARTH.
EVIL, thereby, is defined exhaustively as DISASTERS (earthquakes, volcanos, floods, droughts, storms, accidents), PREDATION (human and animal), DISEASES (including all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence) and DEATH.
He is a Lutheran pastor till death and had a tragic personal life?
was indeed a deeply philosophical person, but he was not a Lutheran pastor. However, his personal life was marked by tragedy. Planck was married twice, and both of his first wife and his children died in tragic circumstances. His first wife passed away relatively young, and later, two of his children died, one during World War I and another under difficult circumstances. Despite these personal losses, Planck remained dedicated to his scientific work.
❤
Maybe energy and consciousness are related
Like brother and sister??
Like quantum entanglement
Unperceived dimensions of existence which we are tied to coming into the influence of the masters, the unaware, or the unlearned.
Matter, energy, and Spirit make up the universe.
Book of Udo
"Could the unperceived dimensions of existence reveal deeper truths about the connection between matter, energy, and spirit? How does our awareness-or lack of it-shape our understanding of the universe's true nature?"
@Spiritual-Quest
As I believe, these dimensions are the heavens. Jesus Christ came to reunite that which was once a singular state of being, but had become seperated at some time, some past age that we philosophers and theologians attempt to put words to which help us keep our focus on in a material world of change. There is nothing new under the sun. What has been before will be again. And since Christ came, He offers everyone who follows His teachings a way back into this once lost idyllic state, though temporarily for now. A Greek word used for who Jesus Christ is in the Scriptures is "Thura".
Which means a doorway, or a gateway, or a portal in which one can go through into another place. Another reality.
It is, in my belief this is describing the Kingdom of the heavens.
No, sorry. Panpsychism is a typical misunderstanding that comes from somehow trying to preserve the inherent existence of matter. Mystics of all traditions have the answer to this, but typically do not use words to convey this understanding. This understanding starts, where words end.
Panpsychism tries to retain the concept of matter as inherently conscious, which can be limiting when trying to understand the true nature of reality. Mystics often point to the ineffable nature of reality, suggesting that direct experience, beyond conceptual frameworks and words, offers a deeper understanding. It's a realization that words can’t fully capture, and that’s where true insight begins. Would you say that the essence of consciousness is something beyond both matter and mind, a state that words are incapable of conveying?
@ Yes, this is what I am trying to say (but even the word ‚beyond‘ is a word coined by a deeply embedded space-time paradigm, so not really expressing what I want to express).
IT IS REALLY ALL ABOUT☯️🧠 QUANTOM⚛️ PHYSIQUES🤹IN 💪SACRED✡️GEOMETRY🍀🕯.THE BODY💯IS THE=mc2 RESULT💞🏋♀️OF THE SACRED🕯MIND🧠of🎺SOUL🎶!
and what about love???
People can pretend their mind or minds are wondrously connected to everything and a sort of universe in itself but when all their super-celebrated "knowledge" allows them to destroy all that lives they will do it and there will be no mind anywhere no matter how far into the universe you think your consciousness goes.
If the mind's potential is wasted on destruction, does that mean true knowledge must come with responsibility? How do we align this 'universal consciousness' with actions that preserve rather than destroy?
@@Spiritual-Quest truth and responsibility are two very different things, one being an actuality, the other being a supposition or apparent inference or a notion, something like that. Responsibility can be a choice, truth is despite choice.
Nothing exists just because someone beleives that. A fact is a fact, thinking about something doesnt make mass exist. It is or is not.
Who made God and if you said no one then that's faith with not a shred of proof.
Sir... is that a paradox????
Oh yes so do I have the same idea of telloric current position of these tiny but super position energy in all the universe itself is a factor of the micro to the unseen biological clock of timelines
The idea of telluric currents and their connection to timelines is fascinating. How do you think this energy shapes our reality?
Everything is made of the same stuff so why in the universe would not everything be conscious? It would be so weird if it were different completely unexplainable. Even that our thoughts have some influence on our reality seems not some great scientific discovery but common sense.
You're touching on a fascinating point! The idea that everything is made of the same fundamental "stuff" hints at the potential interconnectedness of consciousness throughout the universe. If everything originates from the same source, it does seem plausible that some form of consciousness or awareness could be inherent in all things. This is very much aligned with ideas from both quantum physics and various spiritual traditions, where consciousness is seen as an intrinsic part of reality rather than something separate or exclusive to humans.
The concept of our thoughts influencing reality might seem intuitive once we consider how interconnected everything is. After all, our perceptions shape our actions, and our actions, in turn, create the world around us. It’s as though our consciousness is in constant dialogue with the universe.
Does this perspective resonate with your view of reality?
is it a karaoke video with an AI singer ?
It actually is a scientific poem with an old english man reciting it
The ancient Taoists called it yin and yang . i.e. Consciousness and Light .
The tai chi symbol describes this , the tai chi symbol is NOT the symbol of Duality as in right and wrong etc etc. study ancient Taoism. They knew existence before the silly big bang theory .good luck ❤️🍀
The Taoist view suggests that opposites exist in harmony and are complementary forces, just like consciousness and energy, flowing together as one unified whole. They saw existence as a continuous flow, well before modern scientific theories like the Big Bang. It’s fascinating how ancient wisdom aligns with contemporary discoveries! 🌱✨
From the formless God without attributes ie Nirgun Brahm came the Sound Onkar ie Sargun Brahm, Onkar is basic vibration which gave rise to consciousness, the consciousness projection is the World we see around us , the only reality is God the Nirgun Brahm rest everything is an illusion. Search within yourself with devotion and love and truth will be revealed.
If the world is a projection of consciousness, can we truly experience it without understanding the source? What might happen if we searched within with the same devotion and love you speak of?
Same old, If I can't understand it, it must be god. I'll stick with cause and effect until they really understand Quantum Physics. When they're certain, I'll re-evaluate. Skepticism is a good thing.
Absolutely, skepticism keeps us curious and grounded. Quantum physics does open doors to fascinating possibilities though... what’s your favorite theory so far?
Why wait, with all this knowledge and personal experiences. Believe you can discover the truth, and just do it. Know who you truly are!!!
God bless❤🙏
That's Blake, not Planck.
👉🦚😊
I don't think so. --- MAx
Why is that?
although I can accept "philosophical idealism" , I don't think the collapse of the wave function proves this, nor indicates that the observation has an effect. I just believe it's a misunderstanding of the basic process of observation and probability. It makes more sense that like shrodingers cat, we just don't "know" until it's observed. rather than the act of observation alters the outcome.
Actually, three scientists won the Noble prize in 2022 proving that Schrodinger (and hence The Vedantic Philosphy is right) - the universe is locally unreal! It is merely a projection of our consciousness.
The collapse of the wave function could be seen more as a result of our lack of knowledge rather than the observer actively influencing the outcome. In that sense, the observation doesn't alter reality, but simply reveals one of the many possibilities. It aligns with the idea that we don’t fully understand the underlying nature of the system until it's measured, but that doesn't necessarily mean observation is a causal factor. Would this mean that reality exists in a superposition of possibilities, only becoming concrete upon measurement?
Unfortunately the need for us to observe proves that God is not observing!
But could it be that our act of observing is part of God's way of experiencing the universe? Does observation by us mean absence, or participation?
A magic beleiving nutter.
No need for the God-smuggling, I'm sure Planck held religious beliefs in some form like nearly everyone born in the 19th century, but there is absolutely zero divinity necessary to panpsychism.
I've considered matter and energy to be a subset of consciousness since I first became interested in philosophy as a teenager, and not once has divinity had anything to do with it. It just makes way more sense for experience to be the fundamental substance of existence, with matter/energy not some different substance, but discrete bundles to conceptually break existence down into something that we can model.
Interesting perspective! But if experience is the fundamental substance, how do you account for the apparent emergence of consciousness in complex systems like brains? Could there be layers to existence that we’re not yet modeling fully?
@@Spiritual-Quest Brains are just another example of these "discrete bundles" of experience that I mentioned. Any identifiable "thing" is like we got some scissors and conceptually cut out a section of experience, just so that we could mentally model it against other discrete "things" in some kind of mechanistic system. Divide it up further for a more complex model and we start dealing with abstractions like matter and energy, but it's all fundamentally a continuity of experience that we started from. Everything is a subset of that.
So it's not consciousness that emerges from brains, but brains that emerge from consciousness.
There could most definitely be layers to existence that we're not yet modelling fully - for one, the way in which we conceptually divide up experience into something we can quantise and measure could potentially be done differently. But moreso than that, consciousness itself is fluid and could potentially take on any kind of form that we've not experienced before. From our experience of memory though, it seems unlikely it'll *completely* overturn our conceptual modelling - science seems to have come up with such versatile and resilient modelling so far - but new experiences always seem to be throwing us new things to consider, making science a practice of growth that's constantly subject to slight revisions.
Ppuuummmm
not « mind » but « soul » not « thoughts « but « consciousness «