Probably why they were trying to rush to get what they can off, Also look at the crane trying to stop it from tipping while risking the crane to go down with it lol
Chances are that was the crew of the container ship. If I knew that there was a stability issue onboard during unloading, I’m not onboard during unloading!
That was the crew who walked off when this tipping started earlier. Fluid shift finished it off. There is a longer video that shows the original offloading cause.
I work in shipping, unloading and loading ships with bulk cargo. If the ship even has a 5 degree list on then it's not long before the first mate is out giving instruction. Surely the container incident could have been avoided?
@@dennisterpstra a list developing while taking of a container is a sign that the vessel has very poor stability. And that increase of stability your talking about? Ever heared about the maximum angle of response? Look it up.
@@Seahorn_ This one did not list heavely. Something else caused this incident. Something which is not mentioned in the video. The usual stability problem on container ship happen when the vessel is being loaded. And the weights of containers are not properly declared. This video shows unloading.
Having been with a Coast Guard Marine Safety unit in the 70s, these videos would have been priceless. We didn't have all of this great evidence in order to determine cause.
@@f1parcferme American English and British English is taught differently buddy. Unfortunately for you, you Americans cannot pronounce terms of English the correct way. I know you are American due to the name ERIC it’s a giveaway.
A classic mistake was made twice regarding the capsizing of the container vessel. The vessel had an angle of loll due to it being top-heavy. (This is different from an angle of list due to more cargo being loaded on one side than the other.) The priority should have been to increase the stability of the vessel as soon as possible. Counter-intuitively, containers should have been removed from the higher side of the ship, (in this case the starboard side). This would further increase the list, but make the vessel more stable. Unfortunately, in this case, the containers were being removed from the lower side (port side). To make matters worse, once the vessel started to capsize, the gantry driver attempted to reload a container on the starboard side (high side) which would have made the vessel even more top-heavy, quickening the vessel's demise.
I beg to differ. The ship is barely unloaded aka it would have been even more top heavy before. It wouldn't have survived the waves on sea. IMHO there had been something else going southwards before or otherwise there wouldn't had been such a crowd. Increasing the stability is normally right but it only matters when you have a momentum aka rolling in the sea. Here they are trying to safe the ship by removing weight on the side it is leaning to. Most likely the ship was top heavy plus something else went wrong that we don't know about.
@@svenweihusen57 If everyone was doing everything legally, your reasoning would be correct, but both the crew and management of this ship were obviously a bunch of cowboys. To capsize a ship due to listing moments is highly unlikely unless there is deck edge immersion, but the ship would already have to be heavily listed over to reach that state. Very often, the number of containers you can load on a containership is limited by a vessel's GM (stability) and not the maximum permissible draught. To get around this, some of the more experienced captains may maximise their cargo lift by loading until the vessel is legally unstable (
@@ChrisTaylor-NEP thanks for the explanation, I couldn't understand how such a ship would survive the journey. And if they unloaded a "light" container while a heavier one stayed high up this could have broken the camel's back.
Having seen a few videos like this recently, it is concerning that there seems to be so many on the water who don't seem to be able to do the basic stuff. The number of large ships that just run into other things causing huge amounts of damage is shocking. Surely making sure your ship doesn't wreck everything around it is one of the basic skills of seamanship?
most obstacles are crossing the path without warning , shipcranes to high , courses unguided and unloading containers with the brains of a shrimp is daily routine
ever heard of car accidents, huge signs, beautiful roads marked either side, down the middle, people run off the roads an crash all the time, no roads or signs at sea.
@@davidwarland2680 whataboutery at its finest. Have you actually seen these videos? Why are you trying to excuse the deficiencies in safety, competence, etc on display therein? Roads actually work surprisingly well given how many completely independent operators are on them at close quarters at any time. Not to say they couldn't be better.
@@crabby7668 Im a ships Captain, i have a bit of understanding, whats your understanding, you talk as one who has never seen the ocean, let alone a ship.
Regarding the container vessel capsize, my sole concern was for the safety of the Crew, everything else is replaceable! Whether a miscalculation in the ballast or an unloading sequence error remains to be determined, but the Crew are safe, so all is well, other than their beds and possessions resting on the seabed...
2nd story: Hatches open, shipscranes topped up while shore crane was boomed down.........the polish vessel was probably harrased by the stevedore company to open the hatches before mooring so that they can start cargo operations immediatly. And ofcourse it is now the vessels fault. And if the ships captain gave them the finger and said that they had to wait with cargo operations untill the vessel was moored and kept the hatches and cranes of the vessel secured? Then was the captain to blame again for delaying the cargo operatione Main reason the accident happened was because stevedores could not wait and lowered the jib of the shore crane before the vessel was moored. This is NOT normal practise and I think the stevedores are to blame the most.
I was a on a cruise (Carnival) in the Caribbean in the late '80s and our ship t-boned a 320 foot Cuban freighter about 6am. Clear, calm weather.....it split in two and sank. How we didn't see it, and it didn't see us was unbelievable. Maybe the oceans aren't as big as they appear on the map?
When beating a lake-to-lake transit time is on a Caps mind, lock gates get knocked, deck winches bind up, hands get near crushed removing bollard ropes and other nonsense goes on. Been there
As for the ship berthing …two things stand out.The quay cranes booms should be raised and the ships cranes should be still in the lowest position parallel with the deck.
There is a picture of this vessel leaning to starboard against the pier. According to news sources, it first listed starboard and then rolled over onto the port side.
That _IRMA_ reminds me of when you see trucks driving down the road with their bed lifted in the air, then they hit a bridge. For the last one, "Hey guys, we're listing to port. Should we stop unloading and stabilize?" "Nah, just unload another container from the port side; it'll fix itself."
The captain speeding in that first collision I'd better go to prison. Sick and tired of these people getting off without responsibility. You do your damn job right when you have that much responsibility are you suffer the repercussions.
You’d be pretty happy if that was your container that just got lifted off as the ship went over. Given the container was off the ship would they still be up for salvage costs?
Thumbs down for not knowing the difference between port and starboard for the collision in Canada. (they got "listing to port" right in the last incident though)
What’s crazy is as the removed the first 2 they could see it beginning to capsize and continued on? Instead of stopping and figuring out what to do to save the ship while also saving millions of dollars? At this point they must have been paid to make sure it sunk for insurance money
When will this crane on crane violence cease?
It's gangtry warfare!😁
Ha!
Oh when will we ever learn. Oh when will we ever learn
Despite being 15%
It will cease as soon as human stupidity ceases too.
The number of dock workers standing around watching indicates that the stability problem was well known before unloading even started.
Don’t worry Mammut , Insurance will pay 😂
Yup people love to see failure and will stand there and watch.
Probably why they were trying to rush to get what they can off, Also look at the crane trying to stop it from tipping while risking the crane to go down with it lol
Chances are that was the crew of the container ship.
If I knew that there was a stability issue onboard during unloading, I’m not onboard during unloading!
OMG what a miscalculation in shipping can cost!;Shocking! great video!
2:31 With those many guys standing around watching SOMETHING disastrous must have been expected.
That was the crew who walked off when this tipping started earlier. Fluid shift finished it off. There is a longer video that shows the original offloading cause.
To many people around this ship in a dangerous place, yes.
Ya that's real sus . Next guy says it was the ship's crew. Lets all not give a rats ass.. bye bye boat.
I work in shipping, unloading and loading ships with bulk cargo. If the ship even has a 5 degree list on then it's not long before the first mate is out giving instruction. Surely the container incident could have been avoided?
The more list a vessel gets the more stability it gets. Look it up.
Really strange thing has happend as the vessel lost her stability after a contaner has been removed from deck stowage position...
I just found it hilarious how the crane op tried to counter it with that container.
@@dennisterpstra a list developing while taking of a container is a sign that the vessel has very poor stability. And that increase of stability your talking about? Ever heared about the maximum angle of response? Look it up.
@@Seahorn_ This one did not list heavely. Something else caused this incident. Something which is not mentioned in the video. The usual stability problem on container ship happen when the vessel is being loaded. And the weights of containers are not properly declared. This video shows unloading.
No matter how bad you mess up at your work, you still cant beat these guys
hold my beer....
Need to do more - these are interesting.
Having been with a Coast Guard Marine Safety unit in the 70s, these videos would have been priceless. We didn't have all of this great evidence in order to determine cause.
No one asked for you’re opinion or alleged knowledge of these things
@Christopher Brown Also, "your" is correct.
@@f1parcferme American English and British English is taught differently buddy. Unfortunately for you, you Americans cannot pronounce terms of English the correct way. I know you are American due to the name ERIC it’s a giveaway.
@Christopher Brown It's your.
A classic mistake was made twice regarding the capsizing of the container vessel. The vessel had an angle of loll due to it being top-heavy. (This is different from an angle of list due to more cargo being loaded on one side than the other.) The priority should have been to increase the stability of the vessel as soon as possible. Counter-intuitively, containers should have been removed from the higher side of the ship, (in this case the starboard side). This would further increase the list, but make the vessel more stable. Unfortunately, in this case, the containers were being removed from the lower side (port side). To make matters worse, once the vessel started to capsize, the gantry driver attempted to reload a container on the starboard side (high side) which would have made the vessel even more top-heavy, quickening the vessel's demise.
Maybe just sink it first then no need for any chin-scratching. Heaviest cans should not be up high.
Crap job of loading, methinks.
I beg to differ. The ship is barely unloaded aka it would have been even more top heavy before. It wouldn't have survived the waves on sea.
IMHO there had been something else going southwards before or otherwise there wouldn't had been such a crowd. Increasing the stability is normally right but it only matters when you have a momentum aka rolling in the sea. Here they are trying to safe the ship by removing weight on the side it is leaning to.
Most likely the ship was top heavy plus something else went wrong that we don't know about.
@@svenweihusen57 If everyone was doing everything legally, your reasoning would be correct, but both the crew and management of this ship were obviously a bunch of cowboys.
To capsize a ship due to listing moments is highly unlikely unless there is deck edge immersion, but the ship would already have to be heavily listed over to reach that state.
Very often, the number of containers you can load on a containership is limited by a vessel's GM (stability) and not the maximum permissible draught. To get around this, some of the more experienced captains may maximise their cargo lift by loading until the vessel is legally unstable (
@@ChrisTaylor-NEP thanks for the explanation, I couldn't understand how such a ship would survive the journey. And if they unloaded a "light" container while a heavier one stayed high up this could have broken the camel's back.
Another good video ⛵️🚤🛥️👍👍👍👍👍👍
The crane operator I think tried to save the ship ... who is responsible for unloading or loading? Stay Safe & Keep Reporting!
The captain.
There is an officer who calculates the loading and unloading. Establish a precise order.
I’m surprised they claim the Crain is ok after that shunt
The ships you see 15min a head of you just pop out of nowhere don't they :3
Farmer's Insurance has entered the chat because they've seen a thing or two...
😂
🤣😄😂😄🤣😄😂
"How you gonna keep 'em down on the farm," 🎶
"After they've been to sea?" 🎶
Having seen a few videos like this recently, it is concerning that there seems to be so many on the water who don't seem to be able to do the basic stuff. The number of large ships that just run into other things causing huge amounts of damage is shocking. Surely making sure your ship doesn't wreck everything around it is one of the basic skills of seamanship?
Alot of far east crew have qualifications dubious origins. Ship owners don't care, ship and cargo both over insured.
most obstacles are crossing the path without warning , shipcranes to high , courses unguided and unloading containers with the brains of a shrimp is daily routine
ever heard of car accidents, huge signs, beautiful roads marked either side, down the middle, people run off the roads an crash all the time, no roads or signs at sea.
@@davidwarland2680 whataboutery at its finest. Have you actually seen these videos? Why are you trying to excuse the deficiencies in safety, competence, etc on display therein? Roads actually work surprisingly well given how many completely independent operators are on them at close quarters at any time. Not to say they couldn't be better.
@@crabby7668 Im a ships Captain, i have a bit of understanding, whats your understanding, you talk as one who has never seen the ocean, let alone a ship.
The Swift drivers of the sea.🤦🏽♂️
lol exactly!!!
Sure We're Insured For That
Sure Wish I'd Finish Training
that is the exact reason why refueling at sea is so hard exact distances must be maintained
Not true. Assumption. Vessels enter port after long voyages with plenty of reserves. Free to roam ocean however the weather allows.
@@dennisterpstra Whatever you say, champ.
@Dennis Terpstra Hmm what? I think he meant military ships, they refuel and resupply at sea while moving and it's a delicate procedure.
All are interesting. Thanks for posting. (+1 word to feed the UA-cam algorithm to rank this video higher and recommend it to more viewers. 😉)
Regarding the container vessel capsize, my sole concern was for the safety of the Crew, everything else is replaceable!
Whether a miscalculation in the ballast or an unloading sequence error remains to be determined, but the Crew are safe, so all is well, other than their beds and possessions resting on the seabed...
2nd story: Hatches open, shipscranes topped up while shore crane was boomed down.........the polish vessel was probably harrased by the stevedore company to open the hatches before mooring so that they can start cargo operations immediatly. And ofcourse it is now the vessels fault.
And if the ships captain gave them the finger and said that they had to wait with cargo operations untill the vessel was moored and kept the hatches and cranes of the vessel secured? Then was the captain to blame again for delaying the cargo operatione
Main reason the accident happened was because stevedores could not wait and lowered the jib of the shore crane before the vessel was moored. This is NOT normal practise and I think the stevedores are to blame the most.
subbed, lucaas aviation but for boats is something I didn't realize I needed
Nice video!
Lol. Just found your channel. So good. Subscribed and shared to all my buddies. Thanks!
🤗👍😅GLAD NO ONE WAS HURT 💚💚💚
I was a on a cruise (Carnival) in the Caribbean in the late '80s and our ship t-boned a 320 foot Cuban freighter about 6am. Clear, calm weather.....it split in two and sank. How we didn't see it, and it didn't see us was unbelievable. Maybe the oceans aren't as big as they appear on the map?
No, but it seems the alcohol portion of the crews that night was bigger than it should.
The gantry crane should be put out of service after that hit
Nice 👍
Great channel! Just found it
Really love the content. I've been subscribed for a while. Only complaint is not often enough !! Thank you !
We are working on producing more content.
If shipping accidents occurs often enough for more contents, that would be nice lol
I was wondering what happened with the 2 ships in the Wellend canal, thank you.
When beating a lake-to-lake transit time is on a Caps mind, lock gates get knocked, deck winches bind up, hands get near crushed removing bollard ropes and other nonsense goes on. Been there
The Camaramen saying what? Was killing me
As for the ship berthing …two things stand out.The quay cranes booms should be raised and the ships cranes should be still in the lowest position parallel with the deck.
Esysmon is narrating this. WOW, surprised me.
I knew this was your voice I was hoping it was your channel
Wow that last clip with container ship ⚓ when over so easy. Never seen that happened before
🌎✌️💖
I think the crane of that bunker isn’t those only thing needing some yard time, judging by that stack smoke!
They run on heavy fuel oil, it's cheaper. And Uruguay probably doesn't have strict rules regarding emissions in port. Some other countries have.
I like how the crane operator in the last one was like , "Oh God. Put it back! Put it back!"
I loved how the crane operator tried to put the container back to stop the ship capsizing. didn't work out, though.
“Ladies and gentlemen, if you look out of the right hand side of the aeroplane you will see… - NOT ALL AT ONCE!!”
Great to see clear video where the person recording doesn’t put their phone down at the precise second the impact occurs.
That last one was wild
Yay!
It's very difficult to unload correctly a cargo ship with containers. A single error like this one and the ship sink quick.
There is a picture of this vessel leaning to starboard against the pier. According to news sources, it first listed starboard and then rolled over onto the port side.
Why would the other video be demonetized vs this one?
Wait Esysman has 2 channels?
Gallisions are always fun to watch.
Collisions aren't an uncommon occurrence by the looks of the sides of both Alanis and Florence Spirit
That's called lock rash. The Canadian locks are just big enough to squeeze an modern ship into if they ride the wall in.
1:48 that beam gets quite deformed
2:12 That escalated quickly. Like that got out of hand really fast.
Iskendrun is rather shallow portor was). Remember we had to wait for the tide stuck in the mud.
Did the Sea Eagle not put ballast in the bottom tanks?
old mate putting the box back on the ship :P
6 short and 1 long for emergency signal? Do they not follow international regs there ? And why is it different?
God bless the crew and their families!
it's not a very deep port if it's resting on the bottom
Why were they unloading off the starboard side when the chip was listing to Port already? Basic physics!
That _IRMA_ reminds me of when you see trucks driving down the road with their bed lifted in the air, then they hit a bridge.
For the last one, "Hey guys, we're listing to port. Should we stop unloading and stabilize?" "Nah, just unload another container from the port side; it'll fix itself."
Sea eagle = Spread eagle 🤣⛳
Why does the Alanis looks like it has already been damaged on its side before the crash happened?
Its rubs from lock walls as boat raises and lowers. What ain' " just paint" is acting rammy while in open sections of canal.
I've seen the Alanis near Rockport. What you see, is wind turbines she's transporting.
2:59 cold one for a crane operator for attempt of putting weight of other side of ship.
😂😂😂 love see those expensive fails
Ships in Canada colliding?
Lucky this wasn't Halifax.
Wellend Canal??? Bellend more like!
Why was all those dockers standing around not working?
When a container ship sinks, does anybody try to retrieve the containers (maybe cranes with chains?) and does the ship just get left in water?
Depending on the situation, most times all would be salvaged.
I would think most port docks are too valuable to abandon.
*For sale*
Two hundred slightly used cars.
Low mileage!
Seriously?? No they are going to leave it there and not use that dock anymore.
Genius at the helm
The listing ship was almost saved by that crane operator…
0:54 Isn't that starboard?
Ladies and gentlemen this is why there is shortages. They let idiots drive ships now.
The government probably mandated that half of the Captains are idiots because equality.
Two of Canada's finest canal pilots right there
That small canal in that first accident looked way too small for two ships.
Try again. It's only been around for 150 years or so in various forms.
How does a container ship roll over like that
Incorrect ballast.
7 (Seven) short and 1 (one) - only like this.
It’s not easy to be sober on the job!
Esysman is that you?
Woow thats why I never ot my courier
The captain speeding in that first collision I'd better go to prison. Sick and tired of these people getting off without responsibility. You do your damn job right when you have that much responsibility are you suffer the repercussions.
Try going back to grammar school. Both of those shops had canal pilots on board.
I like this temp
Oh its listing overboard wow.
Crew running away from a non-existent danger LOL
It's easy to sit at home and say that, when you are there you don't know what is going to happen.
@@3minutesofmaritime617 the intelligent ones stood their ground because they knew what was going to happen
It wasn't a collision, it was a game of chicken!
look at all the prior damage, WHERE ARE THE AGENCIES WE PAY DEARLY TO PROTECT US FROM THIS HAPPENING???? !!!!
You’d be pretty happy if that was your container that just got lifted off as the ship went over. Given the container was off the ship would they still be up for salvage costs?
it was full of Columbian cocaine maaaan
Those of us who UA-cam are waiting for marinasucre to debut on this channel. Can I get a si senôr if you know what I'm talking about .
Ship's lives matter........
Yes sir, it looked like the tanker ship 🚢 was taking on water 💧 how scary 😨 😳 😬.
This kind of incompetence is scary ,all 100% human error .
Alanis? Isn’t it ironic, don’t you think?
Crane tried to put container down to balance it but too late.
that crane operator was shitting his pants for sure
General Emergency alarm described in the video is wrong.
ระบบนำร่องของเรือน่ามีปัญหาค่ะซึ่งเกิดขึ้นน้อยมากยกเว้นพื้นที่มันมีกมอกลงจัดๆหรือความบกพร่องส่วนบุคล(กัปตัน)
Thumbs down for not knowing the difference between port and starboard for the collision in Canada. (they got "listing to port" right in the last incident though)
What’s crazy is as the removed the first 2 they could see it beginning to capsize and continued on? Instead of stopping and figuring out what to do to save the ship while also saving millions of dollars? At this point they must have been paid to make sure it sunk for insurance money
How the heck does that even happen??
Stupidity is so dangerous
Isn't the first one old news.
This isn't a news channel.
Why can’t you just use a thumbnail from the actual video I feel duped 👎
The thumbnail is a photo of the actual tanker that rolled over. How is that duping you?
Obviously the drinking and driving goes on at sea also.