Who Killed Kiss? The Killer is Revealed! | Hollyoaks
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 жов 2024
- Who's the culprit behind George Kiss' murder? The truth is revealed!
Watch Hollyoaks on All 4: bit.ly/2IZ3Ohd /
Subscribe to the UA-cam channel: bit.ly/2HKAewU
Twitter: @Hollyoaks
Snapchat: Search Hollyoaks' to subscribe
Facebook: / hollyoaks
Instagram: search 'HollyoaksOfficial'
Hollyoaks website: www.channel4.co...
For help and support visit: www.channel4.c...
#HollyoaksGeorge #HollyoaksJohnPaul #Hollyoaks2021 #Hollyoaks
I knew it was Sally,her guilt was showing since the morning after kiss death.
I knew it! Sally did it and Theresa covered it up and took the blame for her.
The question is: Did they even have a single kiss in the entire story? George Kiss doesn't kiss! 😂
Knew all along it was sally, when George turned round and said ‘what do you want’ just before he got killed, I just thought it was her straight away for some reason
Yes, the shadow that showed up felt like Sally all along.
Hmmmm when did u think it
@@ann-christinenilsson4046 Sweet Jaysus! What a wonderful Mother to do that for her Boy. God Bless.
im pretty sure george was saying that to theresa
You would have made a great Detective. I thought it was James who had feelings for John Paul or even Ste who may have wanted a second chance with him. The Statue that was used was similar to the one that was used on Falcon Crest in 1982 when Carlo Agretti was murdered this was next to Who Killed Lucy Beale on Eastenders or even Who Killed Tom King On Emmerdale. Poor Sally, if she is convicted would they put her in a Men's Prison
Poor John Paul😢! He's got a lot to process at the moment and now this.😢💔💔💔
Yeah I knew it would be Sally and that Theresa was covering for her. Sally giving George the unexpected final blow was the last course on her mind so I'm sure she didn't mean to kill George as much she wants him to pay for taunting and abusing John Paul so far as I'm concerned it was self defense because George was about to hit Theresa. Sally better not get sent down for this. She is the kindest woman in the world and would do anything to protect her kids
Sorry, but from a legal point of view what is important is the evidence of the actual incident. How kind and thoughtful Sally is otherwise does not allow her to kill someone. And the evidence, had this been a real case, doesn`t look to good for her. Or at least not for the explanation she and Theresa claims to be the truth. Had there been a physical confrontation between George and Theresa, as Theresa claims, it is odd there was not found any evidence of that confrontation neither on the crime scene, nor on George`s body in the preliminary post mortem. Consequently it seems more likely Sally slammed the book stop into the back of George`s head for some other reason than to protect Theresa. Should that be the case, it is even possible Theresa either saw Sally kill George, or found George dead and worked out someone close to JP - and therefore Theresa herself - were the most likely suspects, and therefore took the book stop, in case there was DNA or fingerprints on it that could get someone she cared about in trouble. In real life these facts would have spelt serious trouble for both Sally and Theresa, had they been caught, and not been believed about their story about George attacking Theresa, because of the lack of forensic and medical evidence of such a confrontation.
I knew Theresa wouldn't have done it. Honestly I was also thinking Sally though. Although this was still surprising to me
Wait Sally didn’t confess when her son was facing a murder charge? TF
Yeah I think the writers were lazy here, or there's been a miscommunication, it's not in Sally's character to hold back if her son is in danger / trouble so doesn't add up you're right, she would have told the police straight away rather than JP and Theresa taking the blame. Shes always saying "I should have protected you" blah blah hmm
@@AdvertisingDream No, I think she was more upset due to the fact that Theresa was covering for Sally and that Theresa may expose Sally because Theresa isn't the most loyal McQueen.
She didn't confess then, so that more episodes could be written
Yeah that part didn't make any sense. It's so out-of character for her to let her son go through all that.
Not Sally it's the closet case cop
If Sally hadn't hit George he would have attacked Theresa then come after her.Good riddance to that evil rubbish.
Sally and Theresa`s problem - had it been a real life incident - is that neither the preliminary post mortem of George, nor the forensic examination of the crime scene found any indications of a violent confrontation - other than the blunt object thump to the back of George`s head that killed him. Had George attacked Theresa, there likely would have been both fibers, perhaps even DNA, from Theresa under George`s fingernails, fibers - or even DNA: skin cells, sweat, saliva - on the ground and on the boxes, maybe even overturned boxes and items spread around on the ground. Without any such evidence, it would not have been inconceivable it would be concluded Sally killed George for some other reason than to protect Theresa or anybody else - making the killing likely to be seen as at least manslaughter. The only thing going for Sally in that situation, would be that she didn`t bring the weapon, but grabbed an object close in sight. At least that would save her a murder charge. Theresa would be in trouble to, having removed evidence from a crime scene, and being part of a killing after the fact.
It is so funny that with social distancing the actors couldn’t hug. Ha ha
They have to have a negative covid test
All of a sudden, everyone knew it was Sally.
Haha,true...but honestly I thought it was Sallly too, so I belive people w6jen they say the same lol
I knew it lol
The residents of hollyoaks have baby skulls 😂😂😂 she literally walked into him and he died 😂😂
FFS, all skulls are baby skulls against Godzally!
Sally and John-Paul are not characters i’d ever thought would be a killer. I guess sally was protecting her son with her life
Why didn't Sally confess straight away then, it's not like her to let her son take the blame, she would do the right thing, and not cause him more pain, so which reason for not owning up to it will the writers come up with, it's just dumb and lazy of them. Maybe they just thought it would be too predictable if it was one of the others, and they just really wanted another "Who done it" storyline, even though it is totally out of character for her.
So true. Only Bronzer (Goldie`s dog) would be a less likely killer.
That's a good question and I didn't think about that. I was originally going "That's what a mama does" when it was revealed Sally killed her son's tormentor but that she let her son be carted off to jail and didn't continue to protect him? There's something wrong there.
@@xxwhispersxx2856yes if they are really going for that, I could see, she did it to protect her son, but I mean afterwards she would have come clean about killing George instead of letting John Paul go to prison/take the blame for it, even if she might think, he would get out quickly again with a good lawyer, if that was another reason the writers were going for.
The acting in this hasnt got any better...
I knew it was Sally I’ve said it from the start she just wanted to protect her son & Teresa wanted to protect Sally for helping her
Sorry, but she didn`t exactly protect her son by getting him held on remand, did she? And since JP had kicked him out and George was going away, JP didn`t really need protection either. Personally I find Sally just a slightly more plausible killer than Bronzer (Goldie`s dog). Neither of them are likely to hit anyone in the back of the head with a book stop, but had Sally done so, I think she would not have watched quietly while her own son was held on remand, and her grandson deprived of his father. So to me this SL does not make sense at all.
ur comment ruined the whole episode for me
@@jaida1753 don’t read the comments before you watch the video 😐
@@chantelle4962 it was in the highlighted section LOL that’s what i meant. ur comment was the top comment. no need to get bitchy chan ..xx
How did Sally move fast enough to grab the bookend and still catch up to him when he was charging Theresa?
She tapped into ultra instinct.
All I’m saying is sally got that mad reaction speed 😂😂😂
Knew it was Sally. One thing I've learned about Hollyoaks is its usually the least likely person that did it.
not me over here thinking Cohen did it-
Theresa being a mum for once, rarely ever looked after her own kid.
Nivan how old was she when she had Kathleen btw? Cause she kinda looks like a teen mother. Well I mean she looks like a mom who had her child at a very young age.
@@Ghet104 kathleen angel was born in oct. 2010, so about ten years ago. n theresa got pregnant with her when she was a teenager ( around seventeen i think ). so that makes kathleen angel ten years old n theresa around twenty seven years old. hope that clears things up for you, hun!! 🧚♀️🧚♀️
@@mouveeee yup she was a teenage mum, I just wish they showed them bonding more. Half the time the kid was with another family member.
@@weskershades yuhhh fr, i totally agree.
She has another daughter too, where is she supposed to be?
Oh, deary deary me. Theresa`s story made it obvious she couldn`t be telling the truth, and have killed George at same time, since she claimed he came at her, pushed her to the ground - yet she somehow must have managed to free herself, to be able to thump him in the back of the head, as was the cause of death according to the preliminary post mortem. So she couldn`t be the killer. At least not if the story about George attacking her was true, cause then he would not have been thumped in the back of the head, but in the front, or one of the sides. Not to mention fiber from her clothes should have been found under his fingernails - and discovered during the preliminary post mortem - if he had grabbed her, as she claimed. So why were they not? More than likely he would have had cuts and bruises from her defensive moves as well, had the story about George attacking her been true. Which either it is not, or the story is flawed, since any physical altercation between George and Theresa there would have been discovered traces from in the preliminary post mortem. Even George`s last known spoken line (for us viewers) "What do you want?!" does not make sense, unless he addressed someone other than his attacker at that time, or later turned his back to the same attacker, all the time the preliminary post mortem only discovered one thump at the back of his head as cause of death - and he had his face towards the person he addressed at that time. From the crime scene alone, it seems far more plausible that Sally snuck up on George, thumped him in the back of his head, fled the scene - but left the book stop. Theresa either saw Sally kill George, or assumed the killer had to be someone in the circle around JP because of what they had learned about George that day, and therefore removed the book stop, fearing it could contain fingerprints or DNA that could get someone she cared about caught. With Theresa confessing to the killing, and serving the story about the attack, that could have been her way of telling Sally she had her back - since Sally knew it was she, and not Theresa who had killed George. And therefore the only reason for Theresa to give her that clandestine hint, was if Theresa knew Sally was the killer. Sally claiming Theresa was attacked by George would also have made the killing of George justifiable, since Sally would have done what she did to protect Theresa from a physically superior attacker. Unless too many questions were raised about the lack of physical evidence of an altercation between George and Theresa, the police is likely to conclude that Sally acted to protect Theresa, and the fact she only struck George once, and with an item she grabbed in panic on the scene when she saw George attack Theresa - making it severely difficult to prove Sally intended to kill George. All Theresa and Sally would have needed to not be prosecuted would have been a plausible explanation to why they were there - which did not involve causing harm, getting revenge, or getting back at George for what he did to JP. Otherwise the police could come to question if their stories had been prepared for the purpose of not getting caught.
But honestly, the strangest thing about this ending, is that Sally is worried for Theresa`s daughter, Kathleen Angel, but have not shown the same concern for her own son and grandson, despite the former has been held on remand for a killing she herself has committed.
So sorry Hollyoaks, I didn`t really think it would be possible for you to create an even worse whodunit than many of your previous failed attempts at that particular genre - but you proved me wrong. We need letters much further down the alphabet than F to mark this one.
I feel terrible
It's so frustrating! When I was circumstantially in Europe, I could watch and enjoy Holly Oaks! I returned home to Canada and Hm! subscribed to Brit Box hoping "Great British Television" would permit me to see full episodes of Holly Oaks, Nada! back to UA-cam segments! (better than nothing!).
I love this drama series but this us too much . This family is suffering
Knew it all along. In a weird way it was most expected to use the least expected person haha
ive got a feeling kathleen angel is going to be another leah
The writers totally failed on this one
Sally was never going to let John Paul get hurt again!
Does anyone have any idea what's happened to Theresa's other daughter? Has she been written out completely?
i think shes with myra in spain
I dont remember a second child, what was her name? Might jog my memory
@@drins1038 Myra-Pocahontas born in 2014. Dodger is her father.
THEY BOTH WERE INVOLVED?!??
I did call it 🤷🏼♀️
Wheres goldies dress from 😍 love it
Aldi
that was unexpected-
Very much
Same here
Yay Sally!! Any parent would've done this tbh
Yep. Myra would have done it too without question or hesitation.
Why? George was leaving, JP had kicked him out and finished with him. The only thing Sally achieved by killing George was getting her own son held on remand, her grandson deprived of his father, and herself losing sleep over what she had done. In my book that is not something any parent would do. In my book that is something someone far more stupid and ruthless than Sally has been described to be would do, and therefore I frankly find Sally slightly more likely as George`s killer, than Bronzer (Goldie`s dog). But of the human suspects, definitely the least plausible of all. Therefore this is a rubbish SL.
@@Tvjunkieful12 💯👍👍👍 What on earth was she thinking before she did this? She should have just immediately turned herself in.
@@Not-Ap Yes, had she called the police immediately, claimed she had seen George fall backwards into one of his boxes, having stumbled in something, that made him fall backwards, because it was no other wounds than the one to the back of his head that killed him, she likely would have been believed - and George`s death declared to have been accidental - after the book stop in the box was found to match the lethal blow to the back of his head. Even if there were fingerprints or DNA on the book stop, it is unlikely to have been discovered, cause the likelihood he could have been killed with one single blow by his own book stop, would have been less obvious, than him stumbling taking a step backwards, and fall into the box and land o it with the back of his head. And should any such examinations be executed, being JP`s parent, she could claim her fingerprints was left when she visited them in their home, or because she had helped George pack some of his things while he was moving out - he wouldn`t have been there to say against her.
" you want justice for George don't you?" Errr no 🤣🤣
That’s what a mama does tho.
*SPOILERS*
I knew it was Sally
I would not put her to murder someone she too good da do something like that, aye Theresa Cher and Dean I would put them to do it but Sally 😬🤗🥰❤
I suspected it was Sally since the beginning. Others have tried to talk me out of it of course, and I wouldn't blame them for stating why it wouldn't be her because Sally?!
I know she was the first to see George's true colours and was probably feeling guilty for bringing the two together, but why would she put John Paul through that?! That part doesn't make any sense.
I knew it but I’m still shocked that I was right
i mean she had too. George never even kissed his "boyfriend/fiance" once in the entire over year they were together. lol
I mean honesntly...how do you have a love/abusive relationship storyline between these two and yet you never see them kiss once in the entire time? Don't mean to be pc but that seems a little gay baity/misleading. I understand if the actor/actors were uncomfortable doing same sex kisses....but if your an actor/professional and you accepted the part then you should of been prepared or ok with having to do those kinds of scenes when other same sex actors in this series have had no problem doing it.
Omg... Sally killed George!! i thought it was cher or goldie..
Anyone know where goldie dress from?
if george was running towards her, i DOUBT sally had the strength to run faster than him with her body, her arm length as well if too short in reach to hit his head
All of you saying you knew it was Sally, shut up no you didnt, it could’ve been literally anyone🤣
True. Hollyoaks just picked a name out of a hat. Sally would never have kept quiet while her son was held on remand, and her grandson deprived of a father. The SL haven`t been anchored neither in logic, nor in the characters` personalities.
Neonblackbeast yeah you're right, Sally is the last person n earth who I thought would do this. Cause she doesn't even look like the "killing" type person but you never know. It could be anybody no matter how sweet and innocent they might look.
it was obvious it was her 💀 if YOU didn’t know just say that😭
Why do they keep apologizing for killing George. They did John Paul a favor and he keeps whining.... these soaps need to get a reality check..
And JP still acts like he’s sad that Geo is gone. ????
But why kill him? George was leaving, he and JP had broken up. All Sally achieved was to get her son held on remand, her grandson deprived of a father, and herself deprived of sleep, likely. In what way did she do JP a favor? Sally just caused him lots of problems and concerns.
@@Tvjunkieful12 I blame the writers
@@stvp68 I blame the people who think killing people as revenge is justifiable. The writers are writing fiction and entertainment. That is harmless, until people start to believe in it too much. Admittedly I would have liked the characters to be more nuanced and realistic than what we saw with George, Breda, and the list goes on. But those decisions are made higher up, and by a wider scope of people, than just the writers.
But I think it sad so many potential great characters have been ruined by SLs which makes them so hated they need to be written out. And also fear the tendency to kill off characters needed to be existed, is why so many of the Hollyoaks viewers think killing people they feel are bad is justifiable. George, as an example - had he been a real person - would have been the way he was for a reason. Which again means he likely could alter his behavior and thinking through therapy and anti-aggression techniques. Meaning he could have become a good boyfriend/husband to JP and stepfather to Matthew afterwards. But being killed off the way he was, the message Hollyoaks is sending is that certain people deserves to be killed.
That is dangerous, cause those are the signals certain extremist organizations and radicalized elements also sends, and therefore Hollyoaks storylines can cause more people to be radicalized, because they easier accept violence and hate as useful tools in life, than those not desensitized by seeing psycho characters, crimes, violence and hateful outbursts every night. Where characters succeeds, or feel good, executing the same type of hate and violence as the radicalized elements are involved in.
No no u Can't leave it like this, as a cliffhanger here oh my gosh. 😰😱🤯🥶🤐😭🥺😬😰
What!? Sally is the last person on earth who I thought would do this.
I knew Sally had done it and Theresa was covering for her!
Who is theresa to sally ? I still haven’t figured the mcqueen family trees
@@Ishuuuxix No one iirc, Sally is just John Pauls biological father and kinda "joined" the mcqueen family.
Yes, I thought so too from the beginning. Hollyoaks are predictable about who it could be.
@@zachariahsmith1324 who is mother of Theresa ? How did she get into McQueen family c
@@Ishuuuxix Their mother is Mira McQueen and Sally is the biological father of ONLY John Paul and the father of Theresa is unknown. Hope that helps
Remember how she acted about slyver being a muderer
how does a kid who lives in spain have an english acent?
Because she lived in England when she was learning to speak, her family all have English accents and she probably goes to an English school?
@@lornmoulinie7103 but she's been living in Spain for years. She'd have an accent
Have you been to Spain? Certain areas are more English or Scandinavian than Spanish. Everything from pubs and shops to restaurants - and even real estate agencies.
Yeah it was kind of obvious🤷🏾♂️
I knew it was sally.
It was Theresa yay
Whoooo yes kiara!
The height difference alone made you wonder how Theresa could have
I think there's a twist
I still think it was the writers what did it
For some reason I thought it was either Mercedes or Cher or even John Paul or Dean
Oh my OA! Not only does it all make sense, it’s all connected!!!! 😱😱😱😱
I missed today’s episode don’t even know wat happened🙄
Sally was the one who clobbered George over the head
@@scarletyoung6053 woah that was unexpected
@@editsmikel7930 I know and what made me laugh about sally was that she is the spitting image of my auntie
@@scarletyoung6053 lolllllllllll😆
@@editsmikel7930 and my auntie is also Scottish
no one gonna know....
Yeah i had a feeling it was sally aswell.
I love series This 😄😄 I'm from LAOS 🇱🇦🙏🙏🙏
woo hoo!!! go sally!!! :) but who else thinks that George could still be alive :I :I :I
Oh God no not another back from dead on hollyoaks lol in fact George has already come back from dead lol
i admit sally is the last person i expected. i love her character too.
I already knew it was sally
I don't think its Sally who killed him I think it was someone after that..
Well, I guess it’s good that John Paul has two mothers if one is going away to jail.
I don't like the way this part of the story came to a conclusion.
janice from waterloo road
You just clocked now
@@m56214 what do you mean
@@TheWiseCollector About Waterloo Road that she was in it
@@m56214 what does clocked mean
@@TheWiseCollector You just noticed now
I'm Spartacus 😂😂😂
It only makes sense Sally killed George. And she was defending Theresa. They should just tell the truth.
Damn it was sally oof
Sallys goin down
I guess you could say Sally gave him the big kiss off haha
Where has Moira McQueen gone?
In Spain with Diego iirc
Can’t believe she killed Kiss McQueen for life
But that was an accident! She was stopping him for attacking Theresa! This is so dumb! They should have called for an ambulance immediately! This show is really dumb! Why does everything have to be about making mistakes? Ok, Hollyoaks is really entertaining and good, but sometimes I wish they would show some normal everyday conflicts instead of these murders every now and then.
KNEW IT
hollyoaks using same old doubles with these murders getting boring now
mercedes 2 lovers
jordon 2 kids
george 2 mcqueens
Rip
Hollyoaks is awfully cringy these days the storylines are way to far fetched. There use to be a time this was the most realistic soap whit hard hitting story lines now everybody is a killer 🙄
The series Hollyoaks became boring due to the absence of Ste and Harry 💔
So we all predicting we know it’s sally
That is not a flattering color on Theresa.
Well the shadow on the wall that approached Pc Kiss didn't look that big...just saying...the silhouette looked more like James
what happend to thesresa 2nd daughter myra pocahanthos savage mcqueen she would of been 7 years old
I love to see all the Monday night QB saying I knew this and I knew that shut up you didn't know bupkis
Until the real killer comes fwd or he just comes back alive and yes they'll be QB-ing on Monday night again
I knew it
Love hollyoaks
I guessed Theresa or Dean
I knew it!!!!
God I was right
I wish it wasn't Sally. :(
It was self defence
Good riddance but if they had said that earlier it would be more of protecting someone. They kinda stretched it out a bit
OH MY OA SALLY! 😱😱😱😱 I know why you did it but killing never freed or brought justice to anyone! Once the truth’s out hopefully Sally St. Claire won’t get locked up in a birdcage! 😟😟😟😟🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻 And it’s good to see Kathleen -Angel again! ☺️☺️☺️☺️ I hope she’ll stay in the village permanently and be in the opening titles! 😃😃😃😃 And why in the name of The OA did she leave the village in the first place? 🤨🤨🤨🤨 What do you People think???? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Omg