2.1. 1st Law of Thermodynamics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 100

  • @Nikosmentis
    @Nikosmentis 2 роки тому +3

    By far the best physical chem lectures currently available on UA-cam

  • @ozantunca8879
    @ozantunca8879 8 років тому +37

    These videos are treasure, your presentation,slides,derivation of equations... Just amazing.I wish there would be more subjects.Thanks,thanks,thanks a lot for these videos.

  • @Jallah-Tafari
    @Jallah-Tafari 3 роки тому +6

    Wow! Just what I was looking for. Science is science, but teaching is indeed an ART, and you do it very well!

  • @kylecatman7738
    @kylecatman7738 3 місяці тому +1

    At 2:23:49 there is no work being done so U = Q and they should be equal, you only use enthalpy if there's boundary or flow work. Remember that H = U + PdV, and there's no PdV here. -12,471 Joules is the final answer.

  • @Noellexafael
    @Noellexafael 6 років тому +5

    BEst tutorial i ever found, really well explained, great job and thanks a million you are a life saviour

  • @chandrasekargovindasamy6111
    @chandrasekargovindasamy6111 3 роки тому +3

    Very clear explanation, neat presentation, extensive input. Simply say! " you are excellent in teaching".

  • @nataliemajaryan3718
    @nataliemajaryan3718 5 років тому +7

    I don't know how else to say thank you for this amazing presentation. You saved my life and also made me enjoy physical chemistry.

  • @ciceronromero3288
    @ciceronromero3288 5 місяців тому

    Thank You Very Much Dr. May Sibug-Torres for your Extraordinary Series of Lectures on Physical Chemistry.
    Very clear explanations.
    They have been of great help to me concerning my interest in Engineering Thermodynamics.
    Regards and Congratulations

  • @yamiletm.riveracintron5464
    @yamiletm.riveracintron5464 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing! 1:31:18 made all the puzzle pieces in my head fall together perfectly :) thank you!

  • @chrissy3861
    @chrissy3861 7 років тому +4

    Thank you so much for posting these. You save lives. Please don't stop!

  • @Kevin-sy8uf
    @Kevin-sy8uf Рік тому

    i love you, everyday I love you a little bit more. In all seriousness, you provided me with a great foundation for my class, which I was struggling. I cannot thank you enough!
    Sarah, you are the benchmark I try reach :)

  • @munnesa1
    @munnesa1 7 років тому +27

    This explanation just made me realize how easy this is and how bad my professor is at explaining :P Thank you for this.

  • @rollanpaulparakikay6102
    @rollanpaulparakikay6102 2 роки тому +2

    You can make hard concepts easy to understand (since you always relate them to natural phenomena). Thank you very much!

  • @engkarar5057
    @engkarar5057 3 роки тому +1

    اين احصل على هذه المحاضرات رجاءااااا

  • @jaimerox08
    @jaimerox08 3 роки тому

    Teaching of thermodynamics well taught.

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 2 роки тому

    There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics as entropy is dual!
    From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
    All observers have a localized, focused or syntropic perspective.
    Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.
    My syntropy is your entropy and your syntropy is my entropy -- duality.
    Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
    Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
    Ellipsoids are dual to hyperboloids -- linear algebra & matrices, Gilbert Strang.
    Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
    Curvature or gravitation is dual -- gravitational energy is dual.
    There are patterns of duality hardwired into physics, mathematics & philosophy.
    Homology is dual to co-homology.
    Integration is dual to differentiation.
    Homology and integration reduce the number of dimensions or states -- a syntropic process.
    Co-homology and differentiation increase the number of dimensions or states -- an entropic process.
    Syntropy (convergent) is dual to increasing entropy (divergent) -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
    Gaussian negative curvature is defined by at least two points -- non null homotopic.
    The big bang is a negative curvature singularity or a white hole -- Janus hole/point.
    Janus holes/points have two faces (duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
    Points are dual to lines -- the principle of duality in geometry.
    Null homotopic is dual to non null homotopic.
    Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic.
    The "bridge" between elliptic curves & modular forms is duality!
    Injective is dual to surjective synthesizes bijective or isomorphism.
    Thesis is dual to anti-thesis leads to the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
    Isomorphism is duality: two differing descriptions or aspects of the same thing.
    Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
    "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
    Duality is hardwired into the laws of physics & mathematics!

  •  8 років тому +9

    Hey Sarah. What a great job you have done here on UA-cam. Congrats for your videos. I'll try to do the same in Portuguese as soon as possible. My best wishes

  • @belu41297
    @belu41297 6 років тому +4

    I love your videos and the way you teach!! I actually solved my test while mimicking the "okay"s, so..there

  • @wudonut
    @wudonut 5 років тому

    Clear explaination. It is very helpful!!!!!! Thanks from a Taiwan student.

  • @sophythwe4330
    @sophythwe4330 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much. It actually save me from 16 hours of university lecture which I don’t understand anyway. Hope you can come back and update more videos.

  • @habtamuutamasgen4655
    @habtamuutamasgen4655 Рік тому

    really this lecture video is amazing.Thank you

  • @unggulsulistiosu4090
    @unggulsulistiosu4090 4 роки тому +2

    Need rangkuman dari this video hyungg :")

  • @makayacine9314
    @makayacine9314 4 роки тому

    I just can't believe that you spoke for 3 hours straight when I have to take a break from studying for 10 minutes.

  • @nakirana4626
    @nakirana4626 4 роки тому

    Goodjob your explanation really helps me who didn't understand anything about this topic...Thank you!!

  • @هناءمحمد-ج7ز
    @هناءمحمد-ج7ز 3 роки тому

    In fact U R better than my arabic teacher, your explanation is really made me know how easy this is, just wanna say thank youuu❤️❤️❤️❤️.

  • @md.morshedurrahman5940
    @md.morshedurrahman5940 6 років тому +2

    Thank you for excellent explanation

  • @jessesonnenschein5665
    @jessesonnenschein5665 5 років тому

    I have been struggling too much with thermodynamics since the past year and I used to see it as a very abstract and tedious subject, even though I took quantum mechanics simultaneously, I considered thermodynamics much more difficult...until now. Thanks a lot for these awesome videos., you are helping a lot of guys like me around the world and you will go to heaven for that ahaha.

  • @michaelemmanuel5851
    @michaelemmanuel5851 4 роки тому +1

    I have been watching and following all the explanations here until I read the comments and people pointing out the continueous use of 'Kay's. Now I kept counting the number s of "kay"s.
    It is not cool to point out things like these to every. It is a way for her to keep things flowing. Pointing it out leads to confusion to others like me.
    Good job Sara

  • @MunisaR
    @MunisaR 7 років тому +3

    THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP,ITS SOOOOOOOO HELPFUL.

  • @Ttl707
    @Ttl707 Рік тому

    omg you saved my life. thank you

  • @angelaelyssaalejandro315
    @angelaelyssaalejandro315 6 років тому

    Good study material for the second exam of chem 18!!!!!

  • @Marco-te8to
    @Marco-te8to 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much. Your explenations are really great :) and its helping me much understanding thermodynamics

  • @francine8563
    @francine8563 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much ma'am, i've learned so much! I have a question ma'am, in 1:59:16 , adiabatic irreversible gas, why is it okay to express (V2-V1) in terms of ideal gas nRT/P, when this process is for real gas, hence irreversible. I am quite confused with the part of how the equations are derived while also following the laws or restrictions.

  • @jingyinbao8686
    @jingyinbao8686 6 років тому +1

    very helpful!Thank you for your video

  • @marleneantunes3293
    @marleneantunes3293 3 роки тому

    Can someone explain to me why Enthalpy variation at 2:06:41 isn't zero? In this case, we are talking about an adiabatic process, where P, T and V can vary (are not constants). Enthalpy is the heat involved at Constant pressure. So, why isn't enthalpy zero?

  • @christopherlordmacatuno842
    @christopherlordmacatuno842 3 роки тому +1

    Your accent has some kind of Filipino
    English accent and it's beautiful.

  • @ahmedtaha6431
    @ahmedtaha6431 3 роки тому

    Best tutorial doesn't exis..........

  • @johnpvlog3835
    @johnpvlog3835 3 роки тому +1

    hello, what's the value of delta H and -ngRt to get the delta U @ 2:51:09. upon solving it , im not getting the same answer. can someone double check too? thank you

    • @johnpvlog3835
      @johnpvlog3835 3 роки тому +1

      the answer for delta U was -3263kj/mol . what i got using this, delta U= -3267kj/mol - (6-7.5)(8.314)(298.15) = 451kj/mol

  • @le2967
    @le2967 3 роки тому

    thanks Sarah, you saved my life

  • @NhlapoBongani
    @NhlapoBongani 4 місяці тому

    hey sarah im really enjoying this video but i got a little confused somewhere at 1:50:13, i dont get why you choosed to use work= -Pext.dV if the process is done reversibly why no W= nRTln(v2/v1)

  • @muhammadsannan7153
    @muhammadsannan7153 4 роки тому +2

    Thank You Ma'am! Much Love🌼🌸
    Could you send me these slides!
    I loved the lecture Stuff!

  • @thommyharrespinolgamet3058
    @thommyharrespinolgamet3058 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this!

  • @ryanwilliams5422
    @ryanwilliams5422 4 роки тому +1

    OKAYYYYYY OKAYYYYYYYY OKAYYYYYYYY!!!!!

  • @brad29ful
    @brad29ful 4 роки тому

    you are the best , your explaination make me understand to absorbed thermodynamic study. best regards.
    hope you make more video regarding chemical engineering subjects, me from indonesia.

  • @1htalk334
    @1htalk334 6 років тому

    i love Sarah May Sibug. She knows how to teah

  • @TammyHabal1010
    @TammyHabal1010 3 роки тому

    Life saver, thank you!! 😭

  • @KEM2223
    @KEM2223 2 роки тому

    Can you put subtitles, your lectures are very good

  • @Jaggerbush
    @Jaggerbush 3 роки тому

    Matter can not be created not destroyed. I believe you. This is pretty fancy 😬

  • @VictorHugo-vg7hm
    @VictorHugo-vg7hm 4 роки тому

    I'm really enjoying the video. Nevertheless I still don't understand why dU=n.Cv.dT for ANY process for ideal gases...I got it for the isochoric and isobaric processes only.

  • @fadhl3790
    @fadhl3790 3 роки тому +1

    Can we get the slides please for reference

  • @samithjayawardana3670
    @samithjayawardana3670 6 років тому +1

    thank you very much.

  • @francine8563
    @francine8563 3 роки тому

    Ma'am in 2:51, i am confused on how on did you minus the delta(n), isn't it 9-17/2?

  • @VictorHugo-vg7hm
    @VictorHugo-vg7hm 4 роки тому

    Is the pressure in the isobaric process the same as the external? Because I didn't see her writting Pext for dw=-PdV

  • @jhonyaristizabal9244
    @jhonyaristizabal9244 3 роки тому

    Awesome!!

  • @thulaseeswarareddygukhal9653
    @thulaseeswarareddygukhal9653 4 роки тому

    thank you it helped me a lot

  • @Nick2014B
    @Nick2014B 3 роки тому

    For P chem for adiabatic process doesn't deltaU=-w?

  • @carlossoto1240
    @carlossoto1240 3 роки тому +1

    there are two equations U=Q+W and in other book appears U=Q-W, why??

    • @francaeslouielaburada8257
      @francaeslouielaburada8257 3 роки тому

      An answer to your question is that W is already considered negative due to the Work of expansion equation, W = -PexΔV

  • @jessicachan7216
    @jessicachan7216 8 років тому

    this is beautiful; thank you so much.

  • @stimulantdaimamld2099
    @stimulantdaimamld2099 3 роки тому

    thanks

  • @ambrishabhijatya7842
    @ambrishabhijatya7842 5 років тому +2

    Camille Paglia and this lady here say the most number of "Kays" per sentence.

  • @keerthanmkumar7311
    @keerthanmkumar7311 6 років тому

    at 1;38;48 while calculating no. of moles something is missing can you clarify please

  • @ddave4e
    @ddave4e 4 роки тому

    Life savior

  • @chrisashe9976
    @chrisashe9976 5 років тому

    You are amazing! Thank You!!

  • @GuruDev03
    @GuruDev03 3 роки тому

    Mam ur lectures r really amazing ... mam if u don't mind can u say me which book u refer....

  • @christopherhancock8650
    @christopherhancock8650 Рік тому

    are you canadian? love the video btw

  • @afiqamran1159
    @afiqamran1159 7 років тому +1

    Thank you very much. This is really really helpful

  • @marleneantunes3293
    @marleneantunes3293 3 роки тому

    Can someone confirm to me that the calculation at 53:36 is correct? It gave me -101.19J :/. Btw, thank you for the video!

  • @gunderaogitte4464
    @gunderaogitte4464 5 років тому

    Thnx to lecture mam

  • @alizepnar4200
    @alizepnar4200 4 роки тому

    thank you so much!

  • @Winbob_gymbob
    @Winbob_gymbob 7 років тому

    at 2:38:12, when we're calculating delta-U-not, the PV units end up being KJ, but the delta-H-not is in KJ/mol... am I missing a step?

    • @Winbob_gymbob
      @Winbob_gymbob 7 років тому

      is the the delta-H-not supposed to be multiplied by 1 mole, since the product is 1 mole of waters, so the units for the answer is in 'kJ'?

    • @SarahMaySibugTorres
      @SarahMaySibugTorres  7 років тому +2

      +Andrew Nguyenba hey Andrew! Thanks for pointing this out, I think I missed emphasizing a point in my discussion. In thermochemical equations, the delta-H-not is in kJ per mole of balanced reaction as written or (kJ / mol reaction). When we check out the units for the PV work term (delta-n)RT, delta-n is actually change of moles of gas per mole reaction or (change mol gas / mol reaction). What cancels out when multiplying delta-n with R is (mol gas), so the (mol reaction) unit remains. The units for the PV term should be (kJ / mol reaction), same as delta-H-not. I hope this clarifies things!

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 2 роки тому

      @@SarahMaySibugTorres There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics as entropy is dual!
      From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
      All observers have a localized, focused or syntropic perspective.
      Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.
      My syntropy is your entropy and your syntropy is my entropy -- duality.
      Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
      Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy).
      Ellipsoids are dual to hyperboloids -- linear algebra & matrices, Gilbert Strang.
      Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
      Curvature or gravitation is dual -- gravitational energy is dual.
      There are patterns of duality hardwired into physics, mathematics & philosophy.
      Homology is dual to co-homology.
      Integration is dual to differentiation.
      Homology and integration reduce the number of dimensions or states -- a syntropic process.
      Co-homology and differentiation increase the number of dimensions or states -- an entropic process.
      Syntropy (convergent) is dual to increasing entropy (divergent) -- the 4th law of thermodynamics.
      Gaussian negative curvature is defined by at least two points -- non null homotopic.
      The big bang is a negative curvature singularity or a white hole -- Janus hole/point.
      Janus holes/points have two faces (duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
      Points are dual to lines -- the principle of duality in geometry.
      Null homotopic is dual to non null homotopic.
      Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic.
      The "bridge" between elliptic curves & modular forms is duality!
      Injective is dual to surjective synthesizes bijective or isomorphism.
      Thesis is dual to anti-thesis leads to the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
      Isomorphism is duality: two differing descriptions or aspects of the same thing.
      Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
      "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
      Duality is hardwired into the laws of physics & mathematics!

  • @farhadhussain4069
    @farhadhussain4069 6 років тому

    Wow love it. Such a great understanding material you used . Thank u so much SARAH.👍

  • @JAMES-99-mIn
    @JAMES-99-mIn 5 років тому +1

    when adiabatic, q=0, but why H is not zero as H is q in the constant pressure?

  • @cambonature5029
    @cambonature5029 5 років тому

    Excuse me Sarah but some of my book told me that the work is positive when the expansion form and you telling me that in the expansion form is negative .. could you explain a little? i'm still concern about it and some tutorial said so about this :[

    • @lucam9668
      @lucam9668 3 роки тому

      Thermodynamics and physical chemistry are both same subjects but the work done signs are just opposite.

  • @mukeshkumarpatel9306
    @mukeshkumarpatel9306 5 років тому

    Thanqu mam

  • @afrosheger133
    @afrosheger133 3 роки тому

    no its not thermodynamics is the study of energy conversion between heat and other forms of energy

  • @ahmadsleiman37
    @ahmadsleiman37 4 роки тому +2

    why is she saying (ok) after each and every word

  • @sueanncharlemagne9720
    @sueanncharlemagne9720 5 років тому +11

    great video but for future reference , a little less "kay" would be better.

  • @galibhossainpriyo8828
    @galibhossainpriyo8828 4 роки тому +1

    KAAAY

  • @huzaifaahmad3361
    @huzaifaahmad3361 6 років тому +1

    thinks its brilliant

  • @jayrextong4674
    @jayrextong4674 4 роки тому

    BS CHEM TAMANG ARAL MUNA :DDD

  • @rozestv4191
    @rozestv4191 7 років тому

    Are you Filipino?

  • @boubacardiallodiallo8724
    @boubacardiallodiallo8724 2 роки тому

    eeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddeeeeeeededdeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeeddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeededdddddddddeeedededdzeededeeeeeeeedezzzzdzeszzazzzdeddddedeeedeededdeedeeeeeededdeededeeeddddeddeeeeddeeddddeeddddddeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • @edlubitz2968
    @edlubitz2968 2 роки тому

    Sorry I couldn't listen to this anymore okay! , okay!, okay!

  • @dallasbarrow
    @dallasbarrow 3 роки тому +2

    She says ok over 1000 times so annoying.

  • @hifrax
    @hifrax 3 роки тому

    looked at the comments, Ctrl + D

  • @ScilexGuitar
    @ScilexGuitar 7 років тому +7

    Really nice video but so many times u say "Kay" xD

  • @carinadesousa1165
    @carinadesousa1165 6 років тому +12

    good video but you saying "kay" every two seconds is the most annoying thing in the world

    • @ahmadsleiman37
      @ahmadsleiman37 4 роки тому

      i just started the video and I'm genuinely pissed

  • @Alan-sv6ym
    @Alan-sv6ym Рік тому

    Mommy

  • @د.ندىفيروز
    @د.ندىفيروز 3 роки тому

    i love Sarah May Sibug. She knows how to teah