Guide to Hegel: Thought Thinking Itself
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 вер 2023
- “The Complete Guide to Žižek” is available now: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy
This is part of my ongoing “Guide to Hegel” series.
#hegel #philosophy #zizek #kant #god #philosopher
Thumbnail credit: Konstantin Savitsky, Inok (1897)
I'm having SUCH a blast every monday opening up my document on google docs and taking notes as the lecture progresses. Thank you so much, Julian! Keep it real. Big hug!
it's crazy how good of a teacher Julian is
Hahaha, the PASSION at 38:46 🤣🤣🤣🤣♥️
“Think about it! It is SO simple!” No tf it IS NOT!!! Yet! But I’m sure it will click for me 😅
YEAH
This is one of your best lectures, Julian. To have is to lack.
You a jewel dropper! I feel like I’m up on you before the world catches on to you! 👏🏿
I wanna hear YOUR thoughts on more shit. Like… I’m bout to jump on YOUR philosophy and then one day be breaking you down to others like you be doing for your boy Zizek! 👏🏿🤣
I find you inspiring. You are giving me ideas for my PhD thesis, an Hegelian reading of James Joyce's 'Finnegans Wake'. I am beginning to wonder if I should mention you in my acknowledgements 🙂
WOW. That was mad. I am gobsmacked at how much of that I understood. Thank you!
You look great with the blazer. Man, as a student of translation, I really appreciate this series. Now I understand even more why Derrida asked "what is a relevant translation" instead of "what is a correct translation" in his very Hegelian speech/article about translating Shakespeare.
I envy you your energy and personality. As always it is a pue pleasure to watch your movies. Thank you for making the upcoming long autumn less pesymistic ;)
Great lecture, Julian. Thank you!
this one was a banger. Well done, we like you a lot Julian
Killer. Thanks.
Hi, joining you from Southern California, USA. Enjoy learning from you!
It's so perfectly symbolic and in character for you to casually use an apple as an example.
Very good lecture, thank you
Greetings from Chicago, IL !
Did anyone else notice the d-bag showing up just to crap on Hegel? You've got to be some sort of badass for people to feel passionately about your work so many years later. All the person who said "Hegel is a waste of time..." accomplished was making me want to study Hegel more. Ironically, he's helping your cause of convincing people to read and study more philosophy, not hurting it.
Or maybe it was just Schopenhauer's ghost.... 😅
Love the suit, looking good!❤
Awsome stuff
Greetings from Iran.
“The Complete Guide to Žižek” is now available here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy
The cunnilingus of reason
The problem with the particular knowledge is that it must pressupose something as something, something itself. That is the ghost of the Absolute that appears as ungraspable to the particular knowledge and its duty. If this ghost is the failure of particular knowledge, what it cannot know but must know, Hegel is just showing the same situation with other eyes. What if this "non-knowledge" is actually the core of the things-themselves? What if Kant did not know that he already had the answer? The hidden content of form is nothingness, it is precisely the difference of the thing with itself that constitutes its identity.
I was wondering why you chose this particular thumbnail since it appears to be an Eastern Orthodox monk
Where does Hegel talk about paradise being retroactively made? Can’t seem to find it hmm
Julian, could you please explain the Zizek's quote "Don't fall in love with your suffering. Never presume that your suffering is in itself a proof of your authenticity."? (as you know, this quote is from conversation with Jordan Peterson.)
I really wanna know that meaning but cannot find any clue even in google..
if you handle about the quote, I would really appreciate it!
I think Zizek is in general against the idea of authenticity or being 'authentic' so that's why he says that. For Zizek the subject is a void so how could you be authentic when in our deepest self there is only emptiness? Suffering could be a neurotic defense and you could suffer all you want and never get anywhere. So suffering is not a redeeming state in itself. For psychoanalysis, suffering and pain are different things. Pain is unavoidable but suffering is falling in love with your pain. So suffering might be telling something about yourself, but that does not mean that that part of yourself is in any way authentic
A lot of people identify with their suffering because it gives definition to an otherwise undefined existence. These are temporary, conditional situations that people take up out of ease as it is ready-made and makes for a convenient scapegoat for discontent. They don't have to do the work of investigating and shaping an identity for themselves and can lazily adopt an outward-directed identity that makes someone or something else a perpetrator. If you can identify as being maligned by some thing in the world, it offsets your culpability to do self-reflection and take responsibility to better yourself.
Unfortunatanate that the video lagged at 24 min 😢 I was really in to the lecture. Still fantastic tho
apologies for sipping water
Did this get renamed? I thought it was titled "does god exist?"
a conspiracy :O did god hide his tracks
11:42 - Bro...what is that? Dude says manifestation and something MANIFESTS, LOOKS BRO, LOOK
I prefer abba, that's all I need to understand Hegel
a real man could never become bewildered by meare words lest he become outnumbered..
the contemporary "right" is concerned with declining birth rates for a reason
a real man is never lost in the wilderness so long as he remembers paradise
@@EL_394 That's terrible conventional wisdom. I would say a real man is the one who finds his past in the wilderness on his own, without relying on a stupid notion of paradise; that seems so weak to me, like a kid trying to remember his home so he doesn't get lost, Abrahamic religion makes man weak.
@@theonlygoodlookinghabsburg2081
being at the bottom of the food chain with no capacity to transform the natural forces is subhuman..
animal*
Philosophy is a Greek word salad, made wurst by Hegel.