The Viewer Game Analysis that Made Ben Go Through the 5 Stages of Grief
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 жов 2023
- Check out Ben's Chessable courses here! www.chessable.com/author/BenF... Clip with Ben [10-29-2023]
If you're interested in sponsoring a lecture of your choice, email Karen at karen@atlchessclub.com
Signup or gift a chess.com Premium membership to get access to their lessons, remove ads, improve your chess, AND help Ben at the same time!! Upgrade your chess.com membership or join! - go.chess.com/finegold.
Buy Merch today! ccscatlmerch.com/
Watch live at / itsbenandkaren
Donations are appreciated at: streamlabs.com/itsBenandKaren...
Follow me on Twitter: / ben_finegold
#benfinegold #chess #ViewerGameAnalysis - Ігри
This right here... is prime Ben Finegold content. Bravo!
He made bad choices in life because he had to discuss this game. 😂
OMG I could listen to Ben for hours ranting about f4.
He's hilarious 😂
Ben was so angry the F4 key on my piano felt bad
What happens when you get to the gates of heaven and St. Peter asks "Why did you play f4?"
Gambit your soul and say it was a mouse slip
Get better at chess just so you know how bad f4 is. 😂
This analysis almost made me crack open of laughter.
TIL the five stages of grief are denial, anger, anger again, depression, and even more anger.
The truth hurts
Came for the chess stayed for the cardinality lecture.
Alpha Zero to aleph zero
6:05 This is where the epic F4 rant starts
But if you could play f4 to f2 it wouldn't be so bad. 😂
I want more rufus and doofus analysis like this. They make the type of mistakes I do, so I can benefit way more with Ben telling me why my moves sucks than to pretend to understand some super GM level analysis.
I can imagine myself making a move like f4, watching this, and crying and laughing at the same time as I'm roasted into infinite chess oblivion.
Ironic that Ben (sort of) references Cantor’s diagonal argument in a position with no bishops.
I knew this one was going to be Fine-Gold content. This out did my expectations. I laughed with my girlfriend about f4. This literally made our mornings knowing we can never blunder irl that hard as the f4.
The sixth stage of grief...Banned!
If you play f4 the pawn should capture itself out of shame.
BRUTAL commentary! 😂
"How is this guy 1947 its not even lichess" 💀💀
I forgot, what was the move not to do here that weakens a king? F-something?
When aleph naught is not big enough to express your disappointment.
This is peak content (and I didnt think f4 was that bad at first 😂). Thanks for that.
That was hilarious! I was laughing the entire time
me too xD but then i started thinking about what he would say if he saw my games xD
The cardinality of an infinity basically deals with mapping elements from one set to the other. If you can write out a mapping from one infinite set to another, they are the same "size". So for whole numbers and even numbers, you basically map 0 to 0 (0 is even), 1 to 2, 2 to 4, 3 to 6, ... This shows the "size" of their infinities are the same. An interval on the real number line, on the other hand, has no mapping between whole numbers and every possible real. You can spend up all your mappings on just one tiny segment like 0 to 0.1, 1 to 0.01, 2 to 0.001, .... And you have the rest of that interval of real numbers between 0 and 1 remaining. That's not a formal proof of it, but it should get the general idea across. An common proof assumes a mapping does exist and then shows there is a contradiction -- the ability to construct a new real number definitely not in the assumed mapping, a contradiction proving that no such mapping exists.
There’s actually the same number of numbers between 0 and 1 as there are integers. There’s a bijection between the two sets of numbers with the transition function being removing the decimal point and reversing the numbers (or reversing the numbers and adding a decimal point in the reverse). For example, .1235 gets mapped to 5321, and 4123 gets mapped to .3214.
However, there is not a bijection between all the real numbers on the entire number line and all the integers. The set of all real numbers is a larger set than all the integers (which is what I think Ben meant)
@@ethanandrews3076 What integer maps to 1?
@@AG-ld6rv to add a finite number of mappings to the transition function, you can displace all of the values. So if I want to add 1 to the transition function, I’ll make the integer 1 map to 1, and then displace all the other values over one value. I.e. Before, it was 1 maps to .1, 2 maps to .2, 3 maps to .3… etc. Now, it’s 1 maps to 1, 2 maps to .1, 3 maps to .2, 4 maps to .3
@@ethanandrews3076 And what finite integer maps to irrational, real numbers like pi?
@@AG-ld6rv it’ll be the same number in reverse. So pi will be mapped to …51413
Edit: the formal definition of a decimal number is that it takes the digit and multiplies it by a power of 10. For example, 3.14 is really 3x10^0 + 1x10^-1 + 4x10^-2. This mapped number would be defined by the successive powers of 10: 3x10^0 + 1x10^1 + 4x10^2… = …413
Of all the places, I didn't expect to see lecture on infinite series from Ben xD
6:06 🤣
I really appreciate this style of Ben Finegold content - slightly less acerbic, and teaching more
I want to give this video an infinite sequence of upvotes that is slightly longer than the sequence of question marks given to f4
Ben is why i started playing
Ben would be a great cheerleader for paralympics.
i concur with your analysis
That ending I’m dead
Reminds me of the video of Nigel Short at Atlanta. If I was good, I'd remember what that move was.
I don’t think people realize what Ben does for the whole chess community. He doesn’t have to teach but it’s in his blood and something he loves to do. Which in turn makes you worse at chess.
Ben on fire - he's back!!!!
I'm imagining Dzindzi's reaction
To be honest, at 8:24 I would have done a very stupid thing, but more practical: Qc2, with the idea of trading the Rooks for a Queen, then harassing the c-pawn, since we have two very mobile Rooks
“Get much better at chess.” On it.
The thumbnail and the title of the video is killing me 😂
The_legendary_f4_game____generations_from_now_will_remember_this_day
If only life were just a series of book moves and brillliancies. Unfortunately it's mostly blunders, mistakes and inaccuracies, and cheating is way more prevalent than you thought! 🙃
C4. That’s explosive.
Viewer analysis is your best content
f4? might as well be alt-f4
not a mac user I see 😅
Never play f4 I guess 🤷♂️
Man that thumbnail is amazin😂
Endless entertainment
the f4 meme is upon us
Infinity and beyond
Man, the truth hurts
Great thumbnail and content as always, obviously, Frankly!
an infinity of which no infinity is larger!
Maybe someone sent this game to Fischer. That would explain a lot.
God DAMN f4
F4 was truely disgusting. But at least it looks a tiny bit better than f3.
05:23 did not mentioned the obvious checkmate in 2 with the rooks.
It's funny cause there is no mate
I saw these players have very respectable ratings so it’s funny to think they could make Ben go through the stages of grief 😂
I lost about 3.5 million brain cells after seeing f4😪
Alright Ben. I'm 850. I'll try to reach at least 1500 by the end of the year so I can better understand how bad F4 is.
13:40 There’s actually the same number of numbers between 0 and 1 as there are integers. There’s a bijection between the two sets of numbers with the transition function being removing the decimal point and reversing the numbers (or reversing the numbers and adding a decimal point in the reverse). For example, .1235 gets mapped to 5321, and 4123 gets mapped to .3214
However, there is not a bijection between all the real numbers and all the integers. The set of all real numbers is a larger set than all the integers (which is what I think Ben meant)
Sorry Ben, there is no largest infinity. Just iterate the power set on the natural numbers. Though, I guess maybe you could claim the largest infinity is the class (not set) of all cardinals.
How bad is F4 compared to F8?
This game can't be real, it's not just absent minded blunders, f4 and rb1 are so fundamentally bad there and no 1800-1900s who would do those two moves in a row
I laughed pretty hard when he told us all to get much better just to understand how bad f4 was. Lol. I wish man.
ben is so funny XD
I'm starting to get the feeling that F4 is a bad move.
alt+f4 would have been a better move
F4 gives me hope, I can do better than that. 😂😂😂
I will get better at chess, promise 😂
Did you photoshop their ratings just for kicks easter egg?
Integers and whole numbers are both things. Whole numbers start at 0 and increase by 1 to infinity (0, 1, 2, 3, ...). Integers include the negative numbers as well. And yes, there are as many even whole numbers as there are integers. There are even as many powers of some arbitrarily large number (not zero or one) as there are integers. Aren't homomorphisms great?
I also wouldn't send Ben a blitz game with nonsense moves made under time pressure.
I blame Ben, never play f3
stop, he's already dead
The F4 show 😅
I actually thought f4 was good frankly terrible
12:15 "Qeen H1 also ends?"
Ayo wassup Big Breen? Dats such a Big Breen qestion.
f4 is sooo bad it’s worse than f3
First
Stop drinking into your microphone... be professional man..