Statutory Interpretation Rules of Interpretation

[@Joat_ent]

I really wish for more thorough videos like this one, it really helps when someone who actually understands the law teaches you about it.

[@pweddilana9261]

This series on statutory interpretation was very very helpful! Thank you so much!

[@nairnshelly]

I wish you were my lecturer. Excellent presentation. I have a clearer understanding of the approach. Thank you.

[@zerojokez]

Thank GOD!!!! For the Law Bank!!!! seriously

[@TheLawBank]

I will try and get them all done before your exams in May

[@jamesbogart]

Your two lectures on this subject are quite brilliant in transparency .

[@CassandraLoizou]

I might actually pass my exam now lol

[@esmeevestjens9456]

This is very helpful, thank you for clearing this up!

[@rwhale6339]

This is really helpful, thank you!

[@mrs.lorijohnson]

Great channel, Clearer understanding for Statutory Interpretation. Thank You :)

[@TheLawBank]

No it is the next one to be done in the next week.

[@amyxox]

This lecture is great! Saving GDL students 7 years on! 😅

[@iammcwaffles5514]

This video truly helped me understand this part of the law. Thank you so much!

[@konhunmaye9861]

Thank you!

[@arthurchakanyuka496]

brilliant

[@jujuaddo2531]

thank you very much

[@mohammedjunaid9630]

got exam in 2 days

[@xTenshiAi]

this is very helpful thanks!! please make one on aids

[@sorankurdi]

great video, will look out for more of your videos

[@hazelkmorgan]

AWESOME! AWESOME! AWESOME!

[@beckyjohn6127]

Have you done a video on aids to statutory Interpretation and also the rule of language?

[@antibreeder1m]

Who here is full of mischief? We have a rule for that!! haha

[@elle_la_vie]

this is so good. thank you very much for doing this video. this topic is now a lot clearer to me cause of your video. your explanation is very direct.

[@user-qj5pc4pj9k]

Your videos are brilliant. All books go into the bin. Merry Christmas and happy new year to you and your family.

[@jujuaddo2531]

however, can you please elaborate more on the purposive approach

[@deimantesidla7094]

Have you published the aids that they use already ? I cant seem to find it...

[@lordmountbatten154]

Thank you!

[@TheLawBank]

You're welcome!

[@hazelkmorgan]

Has the one on aids been posted?

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

Thank you this was really helpful

[@Petitz]

Yall tryna be legal practitioners or sumn?
Brazy

[@saraswatkin9226]

Since Brexit EU law does not apply does it?

[@girlygirly382]

great video xxx

[@faridqasimy5351]

Thanks this is a great channel.

[@tacoadele7877]

so helpful!

[@JustAnotherThisDJ]

Hey, do you have a citation for whitely v chappell? I can not find this on Westlaw, and want to use it as an example of the literal rule. ANYONE?.....

[@khevishgopaul1983]

aids to statutory int??

[@keilanatalierose]

Thank you for this, so helpful

[@s.plunkett8051]

Thank you ❤

[@mzeesafaritv850]

Awesome delivery. Very Impressive!

[@elliemorley8302]

This is super clear, helped me with understanding the rules. But still struggling to identify these rules when looking at case reports, any advice?

[@TheLawBank]

What do you mean? Do mean when reading a case you don’t know which rule has been used?

[@elliemorley8302]

@@TheLawBank Sorry reading that back I realised I was super vague! When reading the decisions of judges is case reports we're asked to identify which rules of construciton the judges have applied. I struggle with identifying these, do you have any advice? Should I be looking for keywords?

[@evajayme7746]

Can you give me. Certificate after I study and pay to you? Because I simply understand you clearly. Thank u

[@cutefluffball]

Needed this

[@evajayme7746]

Dear Sir. I like to study with you Directly. How much. Sir. In 80 credits?

[@JoshGProductions]

Aids to Interpretation?

[@francollins4036]

Excellent

[@TheLawBank]

Thanks

[@DJE9684]

Brilliant lecture. Thank you.

[@dadddydm]

Wow,nicely explained

[@sihemotmanetelba9655]

Thank you very much.

[@ss-3662]

Thank you so much. I have a final exam tomorrow. Wish me luck

[@Maanooshen]

Thank you

[@yesk2318]

👌👍❤️ awesome session. Love from an India law student.

[@lostheroes8704]

Amazing!

[@prophetaaron5170]

This is Helpful

[@josephusplutocrat4550]

Thanks Law Bank

[@jammymancy8637]

Great channel, huge help. Mocks tomorrow and this has been perfect!

[@weixian.tan.99]

Thank you 🙏

[@akashameer2271]

What an outstanding explanation, thank you Sir

[@mohsinalikhan625]

Why did he stopped making vedios ?

[@cilama2174]

are judges obliged to follow these rules?

[@shafiqs2561]

YOU ARE NO DOUBT A BOSS ON INTERPRETATION...

[@seweetgirlnay]

God bless you!!

[@rozalina531]

💕🙏🏻💕

[@ludamcmullan8339]

Brilliant! Thank you!

[@abokefredamary6910]

best explanations ever

[@mayeeviee223]

You are amazing!

[@TravelousA]

You are great lecturer. Thanks

[@123vic321vic]

Hi, please can you make a video on aids to interpretation?

[@latifah2163]

Omg I have heard a teacher so clear like you, its been so helpful, thank you.

[@simm8602]

The literal rule is meant to be used even if it leads to an absurdity, but the golden rule can be used if the use of the literal rule would lead to an absurdity.
Does this mean that the judges can decide how big of an absurdity there would have to be before using the golden rule ?

[@christinemomanyi3544]

I wanted to answer you but this is from three years ago😭😭

[@Growwitholiviar]

@@christinemomanyi3544please answer it

[@TheLawBank]

Judges have discretion to decide what counts as an “absurdity” . So the threshold may vary from judge to judge. This is often a criticism of using anything but the literal rule as it makes the law hard to predict and possibly inconsistent. I hope that helps.

[@londonrider3219]

thank you

[@TheLawBank]

😊

[@irdinajailani6360]

Wonderful explanation! Thank you very much :)

[@TheLawBank]

You're very welcome!