►Shop for merchandise: autogefuehl.shop/ ►Subscribe here: ua-cam.com/users/autogefuehl ►Also subscribe to our UA-cam shorts channel: www.youtube.com/@thomasautogefuhl?sub_confirmation=1 ►Follow us on Facebook / Instagram / TikTok @autogefuehl ►Sustainability in the automotive industry documentary: ua-cam.com/video/-8gNXlRGngA/v-deo.htmlsi=bCdeJZORRHNcVmV2 This is our in-depth review of the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro. We're taking a look at Exterior, Interior and the driving experience. 00:00 AMG GT 63 Pro features 03:23 Sound and aerodynamics 04:53 V8 engine 06:12 Interior quality 07:34 Cockpit 09:54 Driver POV 11:20 Trunk / boot 12:24 Acceleration and racing 16:54 Manual shifting 18:57 911 or AMG GT? 20:26 Weight difference 20:59 Price #Mercedes #MercedesAMG
Data & facts: Mercedes AMG GT 63 Pro New generation AMG GT also available as 2+2 seater option Length 4,73 m 186“ GT Pro: better aerodynamics and fixed rear wing, cooling and engine tune Standard carbon fibre package and 21“ forged wheels and ceramic brakes (normal 63 has 20“ standard) Weight: 1950 kg -20 kg to normal 63 And still 355 kg heavier than 911 Double wishbone front Adaptive suspension with anti-roll-control Rear-axle steering 2,5° Active hydraulic aerodynamics and front lift AWD: 100 % rear up to 50/50 split Sport seat standard 63 (animal only) or performance seat (microcut microfibre only), 63 Pro always performance seat Steering wheel available in microcut Trunk / boot 320 l - 675 l 4,6 s 0-100 km/h GT 43 2,0 4-cyl RWD 3,9 s 0-100 km/h GT 55 4,0 l V8 AWD 3,2 s 0-100 km/h GT 63 4,0 l V8 (Pro: 612 hp instead 585 hp and 850 Nm instead 800) AWD 2,8 s 0-100 km/h GT 63 S E 4,0 l V8 Hybrid version 612 hp + 204 hp AWD Porsche 911 comparing acceleration figures: 911 GTS Hybrid: 3 s 911 Turbo: 2,8 s 911 Turbo S: 2,7 s GT Pro Max 317 km/h 197 mph GT 63 around 180.000 Euros / dollars, GT Pro 220.000 Transparency note: Autogefühl videos are independent and free from editorial influence on opinion and rating. But since manufacturers enable us to do the reviews in the first place, for legal reasons this video is marked as _advertisement_.
@@ilyasbuyuklu1587 Comparing Porsche with Lamborghini and Ferrari.... (Former Sales Person of these cars and drove many and many of them) i think Porsche is underpriced 😎😎😎
355 kg weight difference is enormous! It astounds me how Merc and BMW have lost the ability to make lightweight sports cars. You cannot compensate that exess weight just by increasing hp. Physics don't work that way.
People want cooled wireless phone chargers instead of just plugging a cable…. It’s impossible to cram every modern luxury into a car and expect them to remain light
I think that the GT Pro is preferable to the E-Performance, obviously, because of less weight... but also because of a less complicated drive train. Less complications will be really appreciated in the future, considering maintenance and repairs. Awesome video, as always, Thomas!
Once the facelifted 911 Turbo comes out without the side-air intake holes on the back wheel arches, probably my dream GT will be born. From this Merc, I prefer the lowest trim, 55 without spoiler on the rear, very clean yet elegant back.
@@malikcbarnettdude doesn’t change the fact that this thing is super overweight lol. Genuinely have no idea how this thing is so heavy. It weighs more than an M8 Gran Coupe
@@gavcom4060 M8 and GT weigh about the same. A 911 is a significantly smaller car dimensionally and doesnt have to be as good of a "luxury car" as a Mercedes. 911 and C190 AMG GT are real sports cars, this new GT has a completely different motive for a different target market.
Very nice car but unfortunately this GT63 Pro can’t come close to comparing with a 911 GTS in performance or handling let alone any of the 911 GT cars. It may compete better with a 911 S but that is such a let down considering it’s the top GT63 version.
Seen it in flesh it does look even better in person. I LOT of people will choose Mercedes bc of better 4 seats and boot practicality. Also the v8 sounds fantastic. 911 is a bit different and a legend too so I would not switch personally but Mercedes did a great job!
Piano black?? You mean in that small area, which basically drops once you open it up?? That little area of piano?? What has less in this segment? Corvettes have the most horrid divider ever, and even that is basically a piano line. Coupled with the horrid infotainment. And that's the only one that would be close. Ipad, let me guess....piano black buttons would've been much better?? Maybe piano black buttons on a paino black console even...soo good. Thinking you're making a point about their Luxury high perf GT taking a book out of the S-Class, instead of the C Class like last gen isn't the point you think it is. This is S Class + Old GT Naca duct layout. Last gen was C Class + SL. It even outdid the C Class and had plastic door switches. You're probably used to said plastic, so you wouldn't get why that's a big deal on a Merc in that segment.
3:22 this Fake diffuser thing really grinds my gears - a CLA 45 has a better diffuser than this. Maybe not in terms of functionality but in terms of looks
Nearly as heavy as my 7 seater E55 AMG estate from 2004😂. 300 kg heavier than Turbo S+ which has useable rear seats......old one would be much more fun on track. This is just a hard top SL.
It is good you are getting through so many ICEs at the moment, thank you. The external looks on this are wonderful, though I do not really like the bolted on rear spoiler. A GT format is just what I like. The V8 looks and sounds wonderful, but perhaps more like an American muscle car than a more nuanced European one. What ruins it for me are Mercedes contemporary UI/UX choices and especially the iPad in the middle, so for €220k not for me if I had the €220k spare.
Had the new model for about 4-5 months. Man I took a hit on the resale, but that was to be expected. Dealers always give you the song and dance about they don't know the value of such a new car. Really though, the AMG GT 63 had very sharp handling with the rear steer. Overall, it felt pretty flat for the most part. All the driving adjustments are over the top in my opinion. I was so excited when I saw the car available, and had been anticipating the release down in Houston, TX. Turned a lot of heads initially, but really not much different than the SL 63 that I had a year or two ago. If you were not in sport plus, or race it felt kind of plain. For the list price at just about 200k US, I did feel the car was overpriced. The large screen was the same as the sl 63. All in all a terrible design. Should have been integrated into the dash and smaller. End of the day it was distracting when driving. The car came with no back seat and the rear did not fold down as I thought. I bought it anyway. The inside was beautiful and really lit up at night. The car would get on it when you punched in sport plus, but a 3.0 sec to 60 mph seemed unlikely. Ride was composed and quite for the most part, which is a good thing. Suspension I thought was great. I think the tire size was a good choice for handling and ride quality. Car was heavy but most of them are when you have an all-wheel drive set up. I have had two Posche Turbos (non s 992/2021 and 2022) and one Carrera s. 992. All those cars where more fun to drive. Although the Turbo 992 is pretty tame when driving around town. Alos have had two BMW M8 competition coup's and currently in a 2024. The M8 is an older design, but there is something about a 630 HP coupe. The M8 can be quite ferocious when you want it to be. My opinion a better car for the street in Houston. Would I flip back in the AMG GT 63 maybe a yes, but not at 200k. maybe 147k or so used. Overall, a beautiful looking. machine. Maybe the next version needs a about a 70 HP bump and get rid of the screen and re design the dash. The door handles where a bit tricky.
I miss old days when especially Mercedes was known for its unique styling, nowadays all model are similar and this is a 911 copy instead of evolving SLS shape. I owned two Mercedes, but last 10 years I can't even look at them anymore. Why is a G so popular? Because G is a tradition, you can't rename and reshape everything in 5-10 years.
These won’t sell, will be cancelled with the next generation. People want P cars, not their imitation. Original GT was so cool, because it was unique and its own thing, this one is a mere copy at an unreasonable price. They will also depreciate twice faster than the 911, so absolutely no point buying one. The steering wheel is hideous and way too fat, why do you need two rows of buttons? Central console is horrible as well and why do I need a 65” tv in the sports car?
This will not age well. The cockpit looks cheap and in a decade will be laughably out-of-date and likely broken. The smart money is spent on a Porsche.
I’ve been buying new Porsches since 1984. I’m very interested in a GT as I can’t buy a new 911 turbo. The reason is Porsche has gone fully woke and they enabled speculators to take over their higher trim markets for 911s. If I want a turbo or a Gt3 touring, I have to pay$50k-$100k over list to buy one that been abused and flipped back to the dealer and marked up massively. This has destroyed my brand loyalty. I also have an AMG 63s for a sedan which opened the Mercedes option to me. So since Porsches hates me for wanting to buy a new ICE car - I guess I’ll leave their brand permanently.
I dunno, Porsche is just Porsche, you can throw 200 more HP and whatever wheels, but it will never be Porsche. (992.2 even in Carerra trim is just so insane of a car)
The 911 Turbo S does 2.7s 0-100km/h with a flat-6, while the quickest Mercedes does 2.8s with a V8 - though it's significantly heavier with all the luxury bits inside.
Seeing all these people talking trash about such a beautiful car is the sign this world is really going to Sh!t Mercedes is always gonna god of cars for all you haters out there
It may hunt Porsche, but Porsche looks better especially with custom wide body kits.. but the Mercedes interior is untouchable especially the white seats and black carbon dash options...
It's not a bad looking car, but geez why does it have to weigh as much as a small planet? This whole electrification/hybridization/screenification is getting completely out of control.
The problem is it doesn’t matter how much you spend on a Mercedes. They all look pretty much the same. Stupid tablet screens, horizontal grills for AMG’s and really not a lot of class or imagination.
@@Sfetsi06 You don’t think there’s a shared resemblance between the two on, at the very least, the front half of the car? They look “nothing” alike? Mhmm sure.
Mercedes will never be compettion to Porsche because the philosofy of car maker. Mercedes has different philosophy than Porsche. Mercedes priority is safety and comfort. I have driven previous generation and than jumped to 992 911. 911 was totally different world. Exiting and emotion. Mercedes was no exitement boring like hell!
►Shop for merchandise: autogefuehl.shop/
►Subscribe here: ua-cam.com/users/autogefuehl
►Also subscribe to our UA-cam shorts channel: www.youtube.com/@thomasautogefuhl?sub_confirmation=1
►Follow us on Facebook / Instagram / TikTok @autogefuehl
►Sustainability in the automotive industry documentary: ua-cam.com/video/-8gNXlRGngA/v-deo.htmlsi=bCdeJZORRHNcVmV2
This is our in-depth review of the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro. We're taking a look at Exterior, Interior and the driving experience.
00:00 AMG GT 63 Pro features
03:23 Sound and aerodynamics
04:53 V8 engine
06:12 Interior quality
07:34 Cockpit
09:54 Driver POV
11:20 Trunk / boot
12:24 Acceleration and racing
16:54 Manual shifting
18:57 911 or AMG GT?
20:26 Weight difference
20:59 Price
#Mercedes #MercedesAMG
Not going to buy the Pro, gonna wait for the Pro Max
😂😂😂
$350k increase in price
Not for the Ultra?
😂😂😂
Mega Ultra Super Pro Max Extreme Limited ⚡
I had 22 minutes left before leaving for work, this 22' video was the ideal passtime . Thx Thomas 👍
thanks keep tuning in !
Data & facts:
Mercedes AMG GT 63 Pro
New generation AMG GT also available as 2+2 seater option
Length 4,73 m 186“
GT Pro: better aerodynamics and fixed rear wing, cooling and engine tune
Standard carbon fibre package and 21“ forged wheels and ceramic brakes (normal 63 has 20“ standard)
Weight: 1950 kg -20 kg to normal 63
And still 355 kg heavier than 911
Double wishbone front
Adaptive suspension with anti-roll-control
Rear-axle steering 2,5°
Active hydraulic aerodynamics and front lift
AWD: 100 % rear up to 50/50 split
Sport seat standard 63 (animal only) or performance seat (microcut microfibre only), 63 Pro always performance seat
Steering wheel available in microcut
Trunk / boot 320 l - 675 l
4,6 s 0-100 km/h GT 43 2,0 4-cyl RWD
3,9 s 0-100 km/h GT 55 4,0 l V8 AWD
3,2 s 0-100 km/h GT 63 4,0 l V8 (Pro: 612 hp instead 585 hp and 850 Nm instead 800) AWD
2,8 s 0-100 km/h GT 63 S E 4,0 l V8 Hybrid version 612 hp + 204 hp AWD
Porsche 911 comparing acceleration figures:
911 GTS Hybrid: 3 s
911 Turbo: 2,8 s
911 Turbo S: 2,7 s
GT Pro Max 317 km/h 197 mph
GT 63 around 180.000 Euros / dollars, GT Pro 220.000
Transparency note: Autogefühl videos are independent and free from editorial influence on opinion and rating. But since manufacturers enable us to do the reviews in the first place, for legal reasons this video is marked as _advertisement_.
The biggest difference is in the weight. For this reason alone, the 911 is better.
I always loved that car, because it's like a European muscle car... long hood, strong blooberig exhaust... doesn't need to be fastest at all
A nice looking SL coupe …
I prefer the overall look of the previous gen,strict two seater ..AMG GTR GREEN❤
911 for the win though
It's nothing like an sl besides the interior this car is faster sounds better and it handles better and you can't compare a gtr with a GT pro
@@Sfetsi06 why it is not comparable with the previous AMG GTR?
@Sf3tsi06 they both share the same Platform...this "AMG" is even offered with a 2L 4cyl eq boots motor...this gen is a soft sl coupe
Porsche is Porsche and always be Porsche.
Exactly.
And always overpriced 😂😂 (audiporsche)😂😂
@@ilyasbuyuklu1587 but almost always better 😏
@@ilyasbuyuklu1587 Comparing Porsche with Lamborghini and Ferrari.... (Former Sales Person of these cars and drove many and many of them) i think Porsche is underpriced 😎😎😎
But there needs to be rivalry. Thus we need this Mercedes. I'm not sure what the BMW rival would be, I think it's supposed to be the M8.
those wheels are insane
In a good or bad way? Insane is not a word to use when describing wheels 😂
UK viewer here, wasn't expecting Thomas to say 'bollocks' at 6:34 but I'm here for it! Move over #capacitiveBS it's #bollocks time :D
Amg should just bring back SLS.
355 kg weight difference is enormous! It astounds me how Merc and BMW have lost the ability to make lightweight sports cars. You cannot compensate that exess weight just by increasing hp. Physics don't work that way.
It's like driving with 4 adults in the car..
People want cooled wireless phone chargers instead of just plugging a cable….
It’s impossible to cram every modern luxury into a car and expect them to remain light
They have designed their cars to be daily drivers, with lots of technology, luxury, safety features and AWD.
@@richardlabeja that is partly true, but so are Porsches too. And they are not too heavy
I think that the GT Pro is preferable to the E-Performance, obviously, because of less weight... but also because of a less complicated drive train. Less complications will be really appreciated in the future, considering maintenance and repairs. Awesome video, as always, Thomas!
Once the facelifted 911 Turbo comes out without the side-air intake holes on the back wheel arches, probably my dream GT will be born.
From this Merc, I prefer the lowest trim, 55 without spoiler on the rear, very clean yet elegant back.
Too heavy to fight the 911. The predessor was a real 911 competitor. This thing isn't going to break lap records...
how many 911 owners actually go to the track?
@@malikcbarnettdude doesn’t change the fact that this thing is super overweight lol. Genuinely have no idea how this thing is so heavy. It weighs more than an M8 Gran Coupe
@@gavcom4060 M8 and GT weigh about the same. A 911 is a significantly smaller car dimensionally and doesnt have to be as good of a "luxury car" as a Mercedes. 911 and C190 AMG GT are real sports cars, this new GT has a completely different motive for a different target market.
So why it is everyone compares it to the 911 then?@@malikcbarnett
@@SudSale31 Auto journalists compare literally every sports coupe to a 911
Rather than extend the front airdam down, why not use the gravitational field of the car to pull the earth towards it?
Ha , ha , that's a good one it does weigh a lot !
Very nice car but unfortunately this GT63 Pro can’t come close to comparing with a 911 GTS in performance or handling let alone any of the 911 GT cars. It may compete better with a 911 S but that is such a let down considering it’s the top GT63 version.
Seen it in flesh it does look even better in person. I LOT of people will choose Mercedes bc of better 4 seats and boot practicality. Also the v8 sounds fantastic. 911 is a bit different and a legend too so I would not switch personally but Mercedes did a great job!
I hope they make a more tack focused version, like the old GTR and GTR Pro, they were great to drive.
The iPad is a wart on a supermodel. Piano black?? Never again,
Piano black??
You mean in that small area, which basically drops once you open it up??
That little area of piano?? What has less in this segment? Corvettes have the most horrid divider ever, and even that is basically a piano line. Coupled with the horrid infotainment. And that's the only one that would be close.
Ipad, let me guess....piano black buttons would've been much better?? Maybe piano black buttons on a paino black console even...soo good.
Thinking you're making a point about their Luxury high perf GT taking a book out of the S-Class, instead of the C Class like last gen isn't the point you think it is.
This is S Class + Old GT Naca duct layout. Last gen was C Class + SL. It even outdid the C Class and had plastic door switches. You're probably used to said plastic, so you wouldn't get why that's a big deal on a Merc in that segment.
Thomas A5 , S5 now the Merc. AMG GT 63 Pro !
You have been a very busy boy in these couple of days haven't you ?
I miss how the old
Ones looks long bonnet wide back similar to dodge viper
This is actually compelling to the equivalently-priced 911, which is the 911 Turbo.
Nice Review Thomas. Can you review the New Aston Martin Vantage please.
Gorgeous car.
The measure of how enjoyable your videos are is that I watch them about cars I have absolutely no interest in! 😀
well done! salute!
thanks m8 !
3:22 this Fake diffuser thing really grinds my gears - a CLA 45 has a better diffuser than this. Maybe not in terms of functionality but in terms of looks
Tough call between the amg and 911, can't go wrong on either car. Really goes down to styling and brand preference.
مرسيدس بنز 911 هي شاحنة متينة وموثوقة تُستخدم على نطاق واسع في الأعمال الشاقة، خاصة في الشرق الأوسط وأفريقيا.❤❤❤❤
beautiful car
Dude posted 3 videos at the same time 👀🤣🔥
Nearly as heavy as my 7 seater E55 AMG estate from 2004😂. 300 kg heavier than Turbo S+ which has useable rear seats......old one would be much more fun on track.
This is just a hard top SL.
Long live the V8!
Awesome machine.
Beautiful ❤
It is good you are getting through so many ICEs at the moment, thank you.
The external looks on this are wonderful, though I do not really like the bolted on rear spoiler. A GT format is just what I like. The V8 looks and sounds wonderful, but perhaps more like an American muscle car than a more nuanced European one. What ruins it for me are Mercedes contemporary UI/UX choices and especially the iPad in the middle, so for €220k not for me if I had the €220k spare.
At 2.10 you say he has the same name. Only Thomas or Thomas from Autogefuehl, that would be funny, lol
You got the aerodynamic backwards of the wings. Its ok. :)
1950 kg? What a joke.
Doesn't really matter if you can't feel the weight and the weight doesn't affect the performance you people are complaining for no reason
@@Sfetsi06 There is nothing that can be done to hide 2 tons of weight. You cannot break the laws of physics.
I expect an AMG track focused car to sound loud. But that sounds like it has a misfiring engine.
Are you going to review also the 43 version of the same car?
Had the new model for about 4-5 months. Man I took a hit on the resale, but that was to be expected. Dealers always give you the song and dance about they don't know the value of such a new car. Really though, the AMG GT 63 had very sharp handling with the rear steer. Overall, it felt pretty flat for the most part. All the driving adjustments are over the top in my opinion. I was so excited when I saw the car available, and had been anticipating the release down in Houston, TX. Turned a lot of heads initially, but really not much different than the SL 63 that I had a year or two ago. If you were not in sport plus, or race it felt kind of plain. For the list price at just about 200k US, I did feel the car was overpriced. The large screen was the same as the sl 63. All in all a terrible design. Should have been integrated into the dash and smaller. End of the day it was distracting when driving. The car came with no back seat and the rear did not fold down as I thought. I bought it anyway. The inside was beautiful and really lit up at night. The car would get on it when you punched in sport plus, but a 3.0 sec to 60 mph seemed unlikely. Ride was composed and quite for the most part, which is a good thing. Suspension I thought was great. I think the tire size was a good choice for handling and ride quality. Car was heavy but most of them are when you have an all-wheel drive set up. I have had two Posche Turbos (non s 992/2021 and 2022) and one Carrera s. 992. All those cars where more fun to drive. Although the Turbo 992 is pretty tame when driving around town. Alos have had two BMW M8 competition coup's and currently in a 2024. The M8 is an older design, but there is something about a 630 HP coupe. The M8 can be quite ferocious when you want it to be. My opinion a better car for the street in Houston. Would I flip back in the AMG GT 63 maybe a yes, but not at 200k. maybe 147k or so used. Overall, a beautiful looking. machine. Maybe the next version needs a about a 70 HP bump and get rid of the screen and re design the dash. The door handles where a bit tricky.
So when will the GT63 Pro Max be released?
A Real Winner.
best hatchback ever
This BENZ... Very good, very-very good! Much like it! Beautiful... Very-very good 😊
Is there ANY Car in the world compete with Porsche ?
These people are crazy, they make cars from another planet
Yes AMG competes with Porsche
Mclaren
AMG is getting confusing, I didn't realize you could get a 4 cylinder SL roadster until recently. To me that's blasphemous...
Sl 63 us v8
oh my god my dream car
More Lea required please 😆
these can not be the replacement of previous AMG GTR and AMG GTR pro
I miss old days when especially Mercedes was known for its unique styling, nowadays all model are similar and this is a 911 copy instead of evolving SLS shape. I owned two Mercedes, but last 10 years I can't even look at them anymore.
Why is a G so popular? Because G is a tradition, you can't rename and reshape everything in 5-10 years.
i give it to mercedes for finnally makes a sports car that looks unique. BME started with the recent m4 and m3
11:17 is it so difficult to install a display with thin bezels?!? The chinese can do it. This looks outdated already.
These won’t sell, will be cancelled with the next generation. People want P cars, not their imitation. Original GT was so cool, because it was unique and its own thing, this one is a mere copy at an unreasonable price. They will also depreciate twice faster than the 911, so absolutely no point buying one. The steering wheel is hideous and way too fat, why do you need two rows of buttons? Central console is horrible as well and why do I need a 65” tv in the sports car?
This still not the one with rear seats right?
I think its better to wait and buy the Pro Max or Ultra version
Ascari circuit in Ronda?
911all the time 👌
This will not age well. The cockpit looks cheap and in a decade will be laughably out-of-date and likely broken. The smart money is spent on a Porsche.
I’ve been buying new Porsches since 1984. I’m very interested in a GT as I can’t buy a new 911 turbo. The reason is Porsche has gone fully woke and they enabled speculators to take over their higher trim markets for 911s. If I want a turbo or a Gt3 touring, I have to pay$50k-$100k over list to buy one that been abused and flipped back to the dealer and marked up massively. This has destroyed my brand loyalty. I also have an AMG 63s for a sedan which opened the Mercedes option to me. So since Porsches hates me for wanting to buy a new ICE car - I guess I’ll leave their brand permanently.
There are some really weird sounds during track driving. What was that?!
I wondered about that as well, it just sounds the way it is
I think I prefer my M8 Comp Thomas
Thanks for your presentation
Best regards
Audi S5, Panamera GTS, and now this all in 1 day?
And not a single electric cartoon car. YES!
Amg carrera gt 63 pro.. 🤙⭐️
I want it in green hell magno
I wonder how many of these they will sell
Now we need the Animal Skin Police, you can have the respective t-shirt for it!
the grill with the side vents looks so weird. i dont like what mercedes has been doing for the latest generation including this new GT, CLE, E
I dunno, Porsche is just Porsche, you can throw 200 more HP and whatever wheels, but it will never be Porsche. (992.2 even in Carerra trim is just so insane of a car)
How much of that track drive was pumped in sound ? Sounded weird and rattly
Just like it came to the mic
Looks great and is a great car, but a Porsche is a Porsche is a Porsche 😁
Beautiful car, but that augmented noise :(
The 911 Turbo S does 2.7s 0-100km/h with a flat-6, while the quickest Mercedes does 2.8s with a V8 - though it's significantly heavier with all the luxury bits inside.
2.8, in what life time? 🙄
@@MaxNeal-tl9bd The 'data and facts' are as per @autogefuehl comment below. I don't test the cars; I just watch the videos. Ask them.
NEEDS A SUNROOF OPTION LIKE THE 911
Agree with your conclusion here. Driving dynamics should favour the 911 on track. I’d still love to chase one on track next summer though!
not best sound inside at least sounds like engine rattling in plastic box or something... 😂
Such a stunning car , Mercedes is going back to it's roots I love it❤
that interior, all black plastic, that big toysRUs looking iPad screen... It looks very cheap. Not to mention Mercedes reliability problems...
You gave the answer in the opening remarks, you said it “true 911”, everything else is simply a copy
Seeing all these people talking trash about such a beautiful car is the sign this world is really going to Sh!t Mercedes is always gonna god of cars for all you haters out there
It may hunt Porsche, but Porsche looks better especially with custom wide body kits.. but the Mercedes interior is untouchable especially the white seats and black carbon dash options...
Porsche will kill this AMG garbage!!🗑️🙄🤷♀️
So Mercedes can run out of design ideas and do a blatant copy, but god forbid Xiaomi from doing the same...
Can that awful iPad screen be optioned out?
And how does a tall person wear a helmet in this, for a track day?
You’re not buying any car from this century gran pa
They all have big screens everybody likes them
This seems 200kg + tcompared to 911
Porsche ist besser.
Looks like BMW Z4😊
Why bother getting a Pro ? Just get the normal GT and have a stage 1 re map then you would have 650/700 BHP
Can you really take on the 911 with a front engine car?
That front end is starting to look too messy.
👍👍👍
It's not a bad looking car, but geez why does it have to weigh as much as a small planet? This whole electrification/hybridization/screenification is getting completely out of control.
Is the word ‘pro’ or this plain spec supposed to entice anyone?
The problem is it doesn’t matter how much you spend on a Mercedes. They all look pretty much the same. Stupid tablet screens, horizontal grills for AMG’s and really not a lot of class or imagination.
This looks nothing like the other cars in the AMG line up and the screen is pretty functional and works with the interior set up
@@Sfetsi06 it looks like the SL 63 lil bro
@@JohnRhinoTheThird you actually tweaking which part of it looks like the sl besides he doors and the interior?
@@Sfetsi06 You don’t think there’s a shared resemblance between the two on, at the very least, the front half of the car? They look “nothing” alike? Mhmm sure.
Mercedes will never be compettion to Porsche because the philosofy of car maker. Mercedes has different philosophy than Porsche. Mercedes priority is safety and comfort. I have driven previous generation and than jumped to 992 911. 911 was totally different world. Exiting and emotion. Mercedes was no exitement boring like hell!
Rear wing is too much for me
The tablet is awful.
Heavier than the last gen, worse handling. This thing needs to hunt some ozempic before it hunts Porsches.
Looks like a 911 clone in profile. Way too similar looking.
Why does Mercedes even try. 😂