The Tiny Yet Lethal US Drone That Turns Massive Targets into Rubble

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • The sun begins to set over the dusty, war-torn landscape of northeastern Syria, casting long shadows over the rugged terrain where a crack team of US Marines are stationed at a remote forward operating base. On their mission to root out remaining ISIS strongholds and ensure regional stability, today, the Marines have a new weapon at their disposal-the Rogue 1 drone.
    Intelligence has pinpointed a high-value ISIS target hiding in a fortified compound on the outskirts of a small village. The compound is heavily defended, making a ground assault risky and likely to result in casualties.
    Fortunately, the Rogue 1, with its vertical takeoff and landing ability, modular warhead, and high-precision sensors, is designed for this very type of mission. Its stealth and accuracy allow it to strike the target with minimal collateral damage.
    The drone is quickly readied for launch and sent off into the evening sky, flying low and fast as it heads toward its target. As it approaches the village, the Rogue 1’s thermal imaging feature is activated, highlighting the compound's defenses. With stealth mode now on, the Rogue 1's engines run quiet, making it nearly undetectable as it hovers just outside the compound's defenses, gathering crucial data.
    Inside the compound, the ISIS fighters are oblivious to the silent threat above. The Rogue 1 locks onto its target, a heavily fortified building where the target is believed to be hiding, before releasing its payload with a soft thud. The warhead streaks towards the building, and a moment later, a precise explosion rocks the compound, reducing the building to rubble as the guards outside scramble in confusion.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 103

  • @iainriley8819
    @iainriley8819 Місяць тому +66

    94k$ per drone, and The Ukrainian army can do it at max 1k per drone. Somebody is making a lot of profit somewhere .

    • @Meower68
      @Meower68 Місяць тому +9

      An Australian company is providing Ukraine with some drones which are mostly cardboard and rubber bands and come flat-packed. They not a quad-copters, so you have to hand-launch them and they can't really "land," but are still usable as a kamikaze drone. And it's even cheaper.

    • @matteusvirtanen392
      @matteusvirtanen392 Місяць тому +8

      To be fair the vast majority of drones that Ukraine is using are very barebones and are just converted civilian drones with add-on munitions. A lot of the drones used by both Ukraine and Russia in the current war are relatively speaking inaccurate and depending on the operators and EW environment it might take five or ten drones to hit the target. Even that being taken into account it is true that this drone is just a rip-off. If you add thermals, capabilities that add resistance to EW, a better and more reliable fuzing system for munitions and so on you don't go from a thousand dollars to almost a hundred thousand but even ten thousand dollars would be a reasonable amount of money for an advanced one way attack drone of that size. You also have to remember that even if you make the argument that a thousand dollar drone is a good investment the suicide drones work similarly to artillery in the sense that the first hit is very important because after that the enemy will seek cover and be harder to hit and if you need to carry three or fives times as many drones for a hit that is a logistical burden.

    • @kameronjones7139
      @kameronjones7139 Місяць тому +3

      Those also have a 10 percent hit rate

    • @schlend4
      @schlend4 Місяць тому +4

      probably more than 50% of that was developmental funding. i would be surprised if they can't at least shave that down to 20k or lower if they ramp up production and issue orders in 4-digit ranges.
      From that point on stuff like hardendness against electronic countermeasures, reusability (as they can also drop, not just kamikaze), performance and versatility will play deciding factors in it's cost/benefit analysis.
      For example this one seems to have much better optics, which makes it more suited for survailliance and makes it easier to find targets.
      its very possible that it would be the mid-tier option in a High-Low cost mixed arsenal.

    • @FredVanHook
      @FredVanHook Місяць тому +9

      The military industrial complex is a monopoly. They can charge about whatever they want because thanks to lobbyists buying politicians and these companies hiring high ranking military officers, former politicians or politicians family/friends they have eliminated competition from the market.

  • @springbloom5940
    @springbloom5940 Місяць тому +8

    MIC: 'Ok, guys... FPV drone... how can we make it cost a trillon dollars?'

  • @mikemartin9869
    @mikemartin9869 Місяць тому +16

    So you're telling me that this $94,000 drone has about the same flight time and exactly the same range as my DJI mini 2 that cost 400 bucks. Hellfire give me a couple $1000 I can equip it with all the same cameras AND a grenade and accomplish the same mission. It does not take $100,000 weapon system to take out a target it takes a little ingenuity and common sense

    • @vincelycaner4259
      @vincelycaner4259 Місяць тому +1

      Drone promoter : It because it made from U.S.A plus if by adding another $200 U can get a US decal on you drone .😅

    • @Ungood-jl5ep
      @Ungood-jl5ep Місяць тому +2

      Even the normal american made licensed DJI drones made by Anzu are only like $5,000

  • @alf3553
    @alf3553 Місяць тому +10

    Rogue One 😂 Disney is going to have fun with calling it that $$$$$

  • @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium
    @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium Місяць тому +6

    As a Marine, this drone will be a lethal addition to our capabilities. That, and blackmailing our buddies with footage of them on potty breaks. YUT!

  • @MrWhiskers65
    @MrWhiskers65 Місяць тому +8

    I don’t see the difference between the $94k drone and the $1k drone… except price of course.

  • @jeffborders1146
    @jeffborders1146 Місяць тому +3

    Yikes that snapshot of that lady at 2:05 gives her creepy serial killer vibes. Like every day she wakes up and thinks about how to make better killer robots.

  • @bl8danjil
    @bl8danjil Місяць тому +16

    Change the title. It's a loitering munition, not kamikaze drone. The pilot isn't meant to die and there is no sentient AI choosing to die. The thing is essentially a missile with return capability.

    • @mikemurphy5898
      @mikemurphy5898 Місяць тому +1

      Kamikaze drone is well defined in the military and it's not the same as a kamikaze in WW2....a word can usually does have more than one definition. The term refers to a device that is destroyed upon identifying a target, which it is. Making it a loitering, kamikaze drone, which is what he described it as.
      It would be *only* a "loitering" munition as you said, if it would drop a secondary, separate payload containing the explosive.
      No title change is required.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil Місяць тому

      @@mikemurphy5898 Wrong! It's a loitering munition. Even the military refrains from officially classifying them as "Kamikaze drones." It's because the pilot isn't meant to die and sentient AI isn't choosing to die. And that's by American English standards of the term Kamikaze. By Japanese definition of which the word derived from is nowhere near that. So no, this word does not have multiple definitions. Quit making things up.
      "The term refers to a device that is destroyed upon identifying a target"
      Dude, that's what missile is and your description is very broad. That also describes a "kill vehicle" which is usually referenceed in defeating ICBM's.

  • @xenophagia
    @xenophagia Місяць тому +4

    I would definitely hope it has vertical take-off & landing capabilities considering that the drone is in the standard small 'quadcopter' configuration lol.
    Anyway, this was an excellent informative video, as always. 💪

  • @Jim-fe2xz
    @Jim-fe2xz Місяць тому +3

    Airwolf? "Turn on stealth mode and the motors go silent!" Who know it was that easy? In the early 70's I remember members of our RC airplane club talking about proposing RC plane projects to the military - we thought the idea was pretty funny. But now in 2024 look where we are!

    • @nomercyinc6783
      @nomercyinc6783 Місяць тому

      theyve been trying remote control aircraft since the 50s.

  • @LokiDWolf
    @LokiDWolf Місяць тому +5

    Trippy that some of the tech hasn't tricked down to consumer drones. Enough that companies in the U.S. could build their own. And wouldn't be so dependent on DJI.
    Seems like a financial opportunity waiting to happen.

    • @cutedogsgettingcuddles9862
      @cutedogsgettingcuddles9862 Місяць тому +3

      There are instruction videos on this very website showing hobbyists how to construct FPV drones from scratch. And there are other videos showing how Tannerite and shaped charges work. Wrap that in a fragmentation sleeve and you're ready for the front lines of Ukraine.

  • @ristube3319
    @ristube3319 Місяць тому

    4:48 That HumVee looking thing didn’t even shake 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @mikesuch9021
    @mikesuch9021 Місяць тому +3

    Wow you are actually showing drones when you're saying drones not a toilet bowl or a skateboard or something else like all your other videos they never match the dialogue. This one is fairly accurate

  • @de-bodgery
    @de-bodgery Місяць тому +3

    $94,000? For what?! It's a quad copter! The cost for that thing ought to me no more than $1000!!! What a rip off for $94,000!!!

    • @xenophagia
      @xenophagia Місяць тому +3

      The price is most definitely absurd. Even at the small quantity that the military acquired.
      Idk what the DoD's contract with this manufacturer is like, but I hope that per-unit price is stemming from the costs of R&D, and small number of units acquired.
      If the DoD decides to make a large acquisition of these drones in the future, hopefully the price per-unit goes way, *_WAY_* down. Otherwise that cost will unsustainable.

    • @kameronjones7139
      @kameronjones7139 Місяць тому

      ​@@xenophagiafrom what I read it does seem like r&d was included along with various spare parts for training. I have no clue what the actual cost is

  • @Spectrecontrol
    @Spectrecontrol Місяць тому +1

    Awesome, such great designs

  • @anggvoagg7881
    @anggvoagg7881 Місяць тому

    You made a video about the Amazon delivery drone lol... And I watched it😂

  • @thezanzibarbarian5729
    @thezanzibarbarian5729 Місяць тому +1

    You'd have thought that if they want to make a _"stealth drone",_ they'd have used *_toroidal propellers?_*

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you . ( 2024 / June / 15 )

  • @Relayer6a
    @Relayer6a Місяць тому +1

    $94K for a 10 lb. RC drone? Such a bargain.

  • @JonathanSigwart
    @JonathanSigwart Місяць тому +1

    94 000 $ for a drone fucking crazy

  • @stop736
    @stop736 Місяць тому

    This would be great for us Marines. Of course most of us will never even see one in the field. It’ll be in the company commanders office, under his desk in the Pelican briefcase. 😅

  • @Stephanvonwolff
    @Stephanvonwolff Місяць тому +2

    94K per drone is a joke. This should be max 10k with all anti-jaming, sensors, and the warhead.

    • @xenophagia
      @xenophagia Місяць тому

      The price is most definitely absurd. Even at the small quantity that the military acquired.
      Idk what the DoD's contract with this manufacturer is like, but I hope that per-unit price is stemming from the costs of R&D, and small number of units acquired.
      If the DoD decides to make a large acquisition of these drones in the future, hopefully the price per-unit goes way, *_WAY_* down. Otherwise that cost will unsustainable.

    • @thomash8685
      @thomash8685 Місяць тому

      Yeah the price screams DoD funded R&D so PPU should decrease as orders go up.

    • @Rooster_Sailing
      @Rooster_Sailing Місяць тому

      Based on what?

    • @captianplanet363
      @captianplanet363 Місяць тому

      How many could we build for $50 billion?

    • @esshore46Larry-mq9ki
      @esshore46Larry-mq9ki Місяць тому

      xenophagia: Let's not forget, 10% for "The Big Guy!"

  • @sirsmeal3192
    @sirsmeal3192 Місяць тому +1

    "Next generation" profits. This drone adds very little to the equation for exceptional costs.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Місяць тому +1

    though they are prepared for less of your soldiers because these with gizmos you don't need to many manpower

  • @kertmustapha2367
    @kertmustapha2367 Місяць тому +1

    What a Bargain for Only $ 94,000.00 you could pay a high school kid to build them for a fraction of the cost.

  • @barrywilliams991
    @barrywilliams991 Місяць тому +1

    It has engines? It runs on fuel?

  • @danielle_pine9676
    @danielle_pine9676 Місяць тому

    I love this concept. However. Wouldn't it be cheaper to use this system as a pure reconnaissance drone and use this system to guide in cheaper less advanced kamikaze drones. This also means for the same prise as one you could get more hits on target using different warheads or even target more things in the area

  • @rickjames18
    @rickjames18 Місяць тому +1

    While I acknowledge that this kamikaze drone is far more advanced than a simply FPV drone it still strikes me at $94,000 per drone. We as in the US military need something that can do the basics like work in a high EW environment but still be highly resistant and maybe some simply AI targeting for final approach. We need drone in mass at $25,000 or less to make a real difference. Something has to give somewhere. At $94,000 the Marines won't be buying that many. Make it simply but deadly and functional/reliable.

  • @Lykapodium
    @Lykapodium Місяць тому +1

    It's pronounced "fleer" FLIR... the letters are not read out as I've mentioned to you in other videos

  • @RiverOssei
    @RiverOssei Місяць тому

    I'm just here for that documentarian voice

  • @georgecoons6872
    @georgecoons6872 Місяць тому

    it stiill have a hard time blowing a hole in 18 inches of 1 inch plywood. too dam tuff.

  • @joash480
    @joash480 Місяць тому +2

    america keeps making these more expensive versions of cheap war tech for the purpose of maximum profit

  • @mingfanzhang8927
    @mingfanzhang8927 Місяць тому +3

    ❤😊❤😊❤

  • @oculusangelicus8978
    @oculusangelicus8978 Місяць тому

    Huh, so if the Russians think they have seen the worst of Kamikaze Drones, they ain't see nuthin' yet! Having a drone with a Gimballed warhead, that can run Silent, is a nightmare scenario. Plus is had various warhead payloads like Shotgun, HEAT, Traditional HE Kamikaze, plus it's also a scouting Drone with Radar/Lidar capabilities. Someone wanted to make a drone for all occasions, which does cost more than the one Ukraine is making and using but it can also do MUCH more, AND it is recoverable if it doesn't use it's payload, AND most importantly, Jamming won't work on it! NOICE!!!

  • @kludgedude
    @kludgedude Місяць тому

    Flying claymores

  • @dsmoke1972
    @dsmoke1972 Місяць тому +1

    At that price, I would hope you have to prove it's more effective than a $1k drone. this sounds like the Russian army.

  • @ZelosZelo
    @ZelosZelo Місяць тому +2

    the price is excessive. Its clear that someone is making $70k or more per drone. My vote is no. Also I bet that price is not armed, And I bet a simple frag that is dropped from this drone is $100k. They would be awesome, but not at that price its just another company trying to take advantage. These companies need to be forced to show their bottom line. Their real purpose is to make the most money from their products, and the government is not set up to prevent maximum profits. I say any company offering and selling stuff to our military gets 10% . period. 10%profit margin based on what we decide it should have cost because they also lie in bed with with their suppliers. They say we have to pay this much for that so we charge this much for it. And all the profits go to the same "investors" of each "company" War should not be business. If your company is in business to make big money from war you are a big part of the problem. If your company supports its country why is it trying to strip as much money as possible? Also we need to start looking at how much money through investors leaves the country. Its time to start striking back at this financial war that has been happening.

  • @TROOPERfarcry
    @TROOPERfarcry Місяць тому +1

    I wonder if this idea exists: drone isn't armed, but is remote-powered, same size as this one. Uses an infrared laser to designate target.... much larger missile from far away is launched, goes to where drone is laser-designating target. Drone returns to base.

  • @MrFlazz99
    @MrFlazz99 Місяць тому

    This would be the north-west Syria where the US has an illegal occupation?

  • @kailoYT
    @kailoYT Місяць тому

    05:04 Wait! Tear gas canisters? Isn't that like.. erm.. chemical weapons, as in, seriously illegal? Dropping on civilians, sure that's fine, but that's a big DO NOT in armed conflict.

  • @ZX81v2
    @ZX81v2 Місяць тому

    The word Kamikaze is a bad choice. It means "divine wind" in Japanese

  • @adibkashani7616
    @adibkashani7616 27 днів тому

    $94000 per drone is far too expensive, Eukranian 's can produce 200 drones for that price, Chinese military can probably do even better

  • @heath_deadgerpvp1161
    @heath_deadgerpvp1161 Місяць тому +1

    War is such trash.

  • @727sky
    @727sky Місяць тому +3

    Typical American rip off at $94.000 As the FPV drones being used in Ukraine cost $300 to $500... The expensive ones are around $5000... Think about it !!

  • @erickwilliams6147
    @erickwilliams6147 Місяць тому +2

    Rogue One is way overhyped and expensive for such a small drone.😂 The weapon payloads and cameras that were mentioned are entirely too big for that small drone. This channel doesn't look like it does real research on the stories that they cover. Trash!!🤬

  • @Forevertrue
    @Forevertrue Місяць тому

    This is BS. $94 K this is a crock. A big smelly one.

  • @forestchild3511
    @forestchild3511 Місяць тому +1

    just buy them from ukraine for pennies

  • @markl8111
    @markl8111 Місяць тому +2

    $90,000 😂 must have been built by DEI union members

  • @thebigone9781
    @thebigone9781 Місяць тому

    😂 Stealth mode is low rpm, 2. Was not good in 🇺🇦

  • @matthewconnor3198
    @matthewconnor3198 Місяць тому

    Rather 94 Ukraine fpv's

  • @heisljulius
    @heisljulius Місяць тому

    Another overpriced overengineered piece of crp

  • @WayneHe15
    @WayneHe15 Місяць тому +1

    Another over priced Kamikaze drone!

  • @esshore46Larry-mq9ki
    @esshore46Larry-mq9ki Місяць тому

    Sent to Ukraine as we speak. Thanks to the US tax slave.

  • @kwatt-engineer796
    @kwatt-engineer796 Місяць тому

    Typical American approach to making weapons, overbuilt, over engineered and over priced. These things should be considered to be expendable The builders should be offered contracts for $500 each in large numbers. and see what they can come up with. My money would be on a small startup with low overheads hungry for business.

  • @donaldlong9259
    @donaldlong9259 Місяць тому

    Half truth story... Mostly Clickbait!!!

  • @mingfanzhang4600
    @mingfanzhang4600 Місяць тому +2

    ❤😊❤😊❤