Sea Lightning NATO's New Missile Russia Never Expected to Face
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
- Tensions in Europe are skyrocketing, with Russia and NATO locked in a blistering missile arms race unlike anything we’ve seen before. Hypersonic and supersonic missile technology is being churned out at a blistering pace, leaving old arsenals in the dust.
In a desperate push to seize the upper hand, Germany and Norway have united to craft a seaborne missile that could dominate the oceans in this new era of warfare: the Super Sonic Strike Missile, or 3SM Tyrfing.
This beast rockets past Mach 2, boasting advanced guidance, targeting systems, and the agility to juke enemy defenses at breakneck speeds. The 3SM is set to give NATO an unmatched edge in naval combat.
Compared to relics like the Naval Strike Missile, which maxes out at Mach 0.9 and lacks cutting-edge maneuverability, the 3SM promises to catapult Europe’s naval defenses into the future.
Yet, even this missile might not hold a candle to the fearsome technology Russia claims to have at the ready...
If the Zircon is like the other Russian superweapons, it's really only half as good as they say and they only have three of them.
Or, they might be just ballistic missiles in disguise, like the kinzhals. Fast - sure, able to hit any moving target - nah.
Yeah, you never want to underestimate anyone, but Russia does have a long history of over-promising and under-delivering. Reminds me of the stereotypical sleazy used car salesmen.
Russia should really stop overhyping their weapons, because like in the past all it does is make the US make something better to combat something that doesnt even exist😂
Hey wait a minute...
Zircon
"Cubic Zirconium"
They named it after a fake diamond known for being sold on gaudy jewellery on basic cable!!! 😂😂😂😂
Fake, gaudy and basic
That's just Russia all over isn't it?
@@ell0hh might not exist at the moment but it will
Patriot has already proven able to take down Russias new hypersonic missle.
Sure, Adolf
As seen on tv.
No it hasn’t.
Yeah, "hypersonic" due to a technicality...
@@MrPapamaci88
It's like when people say their car can do 0-60 in 2.3 seconds.
If they drive it off a cliff.
_Technically they're correct!_ 😂
This guy can speak a lot faster then any hypersonic missile can go
I note that in 1973, the British Sea Dart (anti-air) missile came into service. It was an air breathing ramjet powered mach 3+ missile which could take out supersonic targets, including other missiles. It is, of course, no longer in service. The missile in the video, which has a different task, appears like a retrograde step, in some respects, although I'm sure it will perform well, if it ever enters production.
Zircon at Mach 9? The experimental rocket powered X-15 going at mach 6.7 melted several external components, so, given Russia's inability to produce reliable kit and its propensity for flat out lying about the capabilities of its weapons systems (e.g. "the T90 is the best tank in the world") I'd say the claim is total BS. Possibly it reaches mach 5+ maybe even mach 6.
Well said!
There is a reason we haven't seen the zircon yet. Usually Russia loves to parade it's next NATO killer garbage yet it's conspicuously absent...
The only thing that matters is who has what actually operational.
Right, so the west then.
@@derek8564, yea because russias are operational they just refuse to use them in the middle of war. 👌
Hi Dark Tech, Please do a video on the Pershing 2, The Hypersonic Missile that Terrified the Soviets and brought them to the Treaty Table in the 1980s, yet still seems to be as, if not more accurate than the "Modern" Russian Hypersonics.
Yeah the zircon isn't a hypersonic missile Ukraine been shooting them down left and right..
It's insane when missiles can pull 50+ G. That's is wild!
The instruments in some projectiles are pushing the thousands. THAT is crazy.
There's no smushy pilot.
It would seem your data is outdated as we now know that the paper tiger Russia's Tsirkon is not a fully capable system as it is vulnerable to the basic Patriot missile defense system.
did u just shake there tic-tacs at us...
Only mach 2?
The G-s they pull is crazy.
Russia will never see it coming, because it won't become operational until 2035.
Yes, you wrote it well, by 2035 they will have everything.
I think you meant 2055..
Ok ok! Show missles radically maneuvering at launch (well below max speed). Where's the videos of them turning in their own length at super or hypersonic speeds? Hmmmm cause they don't exist? It's OK - don't let physics throw cold water on the story.
IF Russia has "hypersonic" missiles I think they would've used them by now.
if you genuinely believe Russia has a missile that can hit mach 9 I have a bridge for sale...
Meanwhile German rocket scientists: WE ARE SO BACK!
3SM - mach 2, crap range and 11 years out. WTF?
It could be due to it being mainly for air defense.
In which case can explain its focus on agility.
Also avoiding missile defense itsself could also explain it. It doesn't matter how slow a weapon is as long as it hits the target. Not everything needs to be hypersonic.
One hypersonic or hundreds of other missiles? That was what one of the US brass said last year, and it was a valid point.
I don't know I am just trying to make excuses. The range is underwhelming.
Still trying to figure out the connection between increased maneuverability and hypersonic speed. Marketing?
.
Nearly all missiles can be land, sea or airborne today.
It's like you're reading a ChatGPT script with a prompt saying, "How many ways can I say the same thing about "X" - write your own scripts - you say the same thing 6 different ways for like 10 minutes. You don't sound interested in what you're reading - I don't think you are.
Ready by 2035.
Does Russia even have a bluev water Navy?
NO MORE SUB-SONICS.
Russia's problem is also numbers. The dreaded Su-57, they only have 17 of them and only about 8 are operational at anyone time. So, they have some pretty formidable stuff but only a few. So you only have to defeat a few.
Zircon😂 should be called a zirconia. Who believes what Russia says.
Take any claim coming out of Russia about their weapons systems with a huge grain of salt. And, if you know any physics at all, you'll know that a mach 9 capability will not be for a missile system that is launched from the surface. Anti-ship missiles tend to be sea skimming systems. Anything that was travelling at mach 9 at any height below 70K feet would melt before it even got anywhere near a target. So, an anti-ship missile? Very doubtful. Nearly all hypersonic weapons are launched at altitude from high flying aircraft and/or are boosted to the upper atmosphere/space by rockets. Unless the projectile is coming almost vertically down upon its target, it invariably slows to high supersonic speeds before it hits. If the Zircon was tested at mach 9, it was doing so at a substantial height, not down low. At most, such a capability might give the target a few less seconds to react to an attack, once the missile dropped into the high supersonic flight regime. The hypersonic flight would only apply to the missile's ingress to the target, meaning if it took a supersonic missile 10 minutes to get a to a target, the hypersonic missile might do it in 2 minutes. Faster, yes, but not impossible to counter. So, apart from the Russian claims, don't believe the hyperbolic nonsense prattled about by the media, either.
Brahmos, P-800
Cant out run a laser mach nine is nothing to something that travels faster 186.000 mile per second
The last 180 years have been full of things we've never seen before from repeaters, gatling guns, planes, AA missles, ICBMs, drones ect. I wish for peaceful things we've never seen before like viable plastic recycling. Not a tree hugger but really now.
Ill put my money on 3sm vs zircon
We've learned all about Russian technology 😂 they can't bolt a drop bomb to a plane.
Introducing the Laser Missile - Game Over!
Mach 2 is slower then most shoulder 😆 launched weapon's or even some fighter jets can go faster than that
Cruise missiles are still subsonic. It's only ballistic missiles that typically get to crazy speeds.
Long Live NATO!!
afghanistan 🇦🇫 has ha 😂
@@ashleyoasis7948Afghan is gay and weak
lol.
⅘ê(11111111111****1***1*1***11***/11***1111**1*11*1*111*1*1************1****1****1**************************************************1*****11*1***********1*1********1* 10:06 10:06 10:06 10:06
1921174111111111441
111 10:06 10:06 10:06 10:06
😮 ⁶211111441144144414,4,4447¢"4" 4$205850525
=9
=9
21
So divide Russian recent claims by 10 to get a reasonable estimate & by 3 if made long ago!!! :)
"Claims". Means but kiss
Wow but why isn't the USA working on this and not Nato??
Why do you think that they are not?
Soon, older weapons will be like the old Swordfish torpedo plane.
New weapons won’t be able to lock on to older slower missiles.
For some reason I don't believe Rasputin the snake oil salesman
2:34 That’s a Swedish flag.
There are better missles then the sm3 the sm6 maybe?
It's foolish to believe Russia and/or China has a missle that goes Mach 9. Perhaps Russia meant to say Mach 0.9 Lol!
I think they mean they have a missile which is piloted by Mark/ markus who is 9 years old😅
The OODA loop window is actually shorter with these sea skimming missiles. The hypersonic missiles need to be at altitude to obtain those speeds which means no horizon to hide behind giving the crew more time to react to the threat.
@@Mwwwwwwwweyes something lost in translation
I really don't get the beginning of this video what does Hypersonic missiles have to do with this anti-ship missile
Hypesonic it's at leat 5Mh ( no russia no china Have it - This - The missile is expected to be delivered from 2035... now Best is Gabriel5 - In 2021, IAI and Thales jointly marketed a variant of the Gabriel V/Blue Spear called Sea Serpent to the Royal Navy
...made in Russia?...wouldn`t worry too much about it...
Jeez, how to make a short story long …
First, Russia only gets to lie so many times about their weapons before the forfeit any belief and stated capabilities, especially consistent over Mach 9 flight. I would lay my life on that among other capabilities being fictional.
However, this new missile from Norway and Germany isn’t expected to be ready until 2035? Was that a typo in the script lol? Who knows where we’re going to be in a decade from now with the technology a decade from now, it would almost be obsolete by the time it was deployed. I have a feeling we’re missing quite a bit of information here. Are used to love this channel but now it seems every video they just take like two sentences of information and drag it out over 8 to 10 minutes, repeating the same thing and showing the same stock footage. Definitely miss the Dark channel.
Of course the Zircon is simply Russian propaganda. If the West cannot build such an advanced missile, it is frankly ludicrous to think that a technologically and economically backwards country like Russia could.
Maybe Russia lies about their abilities but they are still able to kill a lot of people.
7.5 min of tech babble crap 2 min of actual info
Russia has nothing
When Germany gets involved in weapons systems, they leave no holds barred.
again some new old weapon prototype you gave away
Soon, older weapons will be like the old Swordfish torpedo plane.
New weapons won’t be able to lock on to older slower missiles.
In order to fight an extended war with a near peer adversary that has the capability of targeting NATO defense manufacturing, NATO and the US need to begin to build their defense manufacturing deep underground with multiple camouflage entrances and exits to protect against attacks against them and NATO needs to develop multilayer air and missile defenses to protect all of it's strategic infrastructure.
NATO needs to allow NATO countries to stockpile prepositioned ammunitions and supplies in deep underground facilities and keep them as secret and defended as possible.
With today's technologies, it is difficult to keep bases and supplies secret. But NATO needs to solve those problems.
On the other hand, Russia, for example, is heavily dependent on rail and it should be easy for NATO to destroy Russia's rail system.
i can't fucking wait
LOL - the hyperbolic propaganda is strong in this video.
Ha ha...yeah, it's only propaganda when it's about a western technology, but, when it's Russian or Chinese, it's straight-up truth. 😂
Ooooo! Mach 2? I'm almost shaking in my boots. Almost.
What’s Really funny is that the US doesn’t admit to weapons until it’s known the plans are already stolen…. think stealth planes or even the Patriots ability to Down Putins hypersonic missiles which has been proven in Ukraine. However Putin will show videos of an attack on Florida or his hahaha stealth Su-57. Lol
@@ridethecurve55 same thing Ukrainians said when they began blowing Putin's iNviNciBLe HYpeRsOnNiCkz out of they sky with Patriot systems.
Ain’t nobody gonna be here in 2035 if Biden gets reelected
So the best of the best of the European missile producing manufacturers will need over 10 years to develop and manufacture a Mach 2 anti ship missile? Really? USSR had the Mach 2.5 anti ship missiles like the P-700 Granit since the 1970s. USA has multiple supersonic missiles in its inventory, from the Mach 3.5 SM-6 missile, which beside being an anti missile missile, also has anti ship capability, to HARM anti radiation missile, reaching Mach 2,5, to the newly developed PrSM that reaches Mach 5 in its ballistic arch trajectory.. And this video claims that the Norwegian and German companies are proud to bring a Mach 2 anti ship missile in 10 years? Are you ef-ing kidding me?
As far as the Russian "ground braking, hypersonic and invincible" Zircon missile is concerned, I don't believe a single word coming out of the mouth of the war criminal Putin.. He was also bragging with the "invincible" Kinzhal hypersonic missile being used in Ukraine, until the Patriots arrived and started to knock out 10 out of 10 fired every night... So the fact that Putin said that Zircon is a Mach 9 hypersonic cruise missile means less than if it was written on a door of your local pub's bathroom.
P.S. Kongsberg, the producer of the NSM (Naval strike missile) is now, in the context of developing a new supersonic missile, is saying that NSM is an obsolete missile.. But for the last 10 years they've been saying how the NSM is a cutting edge anti ship missile using the pioneering technology for targeting ships, and how it being subsonic and sporting a ridiculously small warhead, is irrelevant.. Now suddenly NSM's slow speed and small warhead make it obsolete.. WTF?? Even the US Navy decided to use the NSM on their upcoming new Constellation class of frigates, as well as on the LCS and some destroyers.. Why did they do that? I've always said NSM is a lemon, especially compared to the new anti ship missile that was recently developed and entered service - the LRASM. LRASM can be fired from the VLS tubes, has a much longer range than NSM, 3 times larger warhead and an actual innovative targeting technology that passively sniffs out enemy ships.. Unfortunately LRSM is also subsonic but still massively superior to NSM..
It's because of American money and advanced weaponry that allows NATO to stand strong against Russia. Without the US, NATO would be greatly challenged by Russia.
It's sad that we humans can continue to develop weapons to destroy each other at such a rapid pace. I'm an ex Submarine sailor and served aboard Nuke boats with Nuke weapons and that was 50 years ago. One Submarine has the firepower to destroy any continent within minutes and we discussed this back in the day with each other aboard the boat. Todays subs are much more powerful, so let that sink in. Who are and where are the peacemakers? Keep this up and we will surely destroy ourselves before it's all over. Negotiate, make deals, trade with one another to each ones benefit and keep our children and grandchildren safe from the psychopaths that are in our current governments.
You can only negotiate with those that want to negotiate
We need ape, ape strong!
Mach 2😅
Oh my, what good things that this money could do to help the world instead of destroying lives and wealth?
Forget about money, think of all the lives that Putin is wasting in Ukraine. 😭
@Meoldson don't forget about NATOs involvement in this war that has nothing to do with the USA.
@@johnbethea4505- so you’d rather appease Russia and then have America solders dying later instead of Ukrainians. Learn from history.
Like your overly hyperbolic titles...
such nafo copium LOL
So how's that three-day "Special Military Humiliation" going?
bUt vLaDimiR pOoTiN hAvE sUpeR wEapoNz
Russia's New Worst Nightmare, I think I'll skip this video...
European missiles... no thanks
One ship carrying 30 Zircons could launch from 500 miles away and destroy an entire fleet before they would be in range with a 120 mile missile. Western nations better get their own hypersonic weapons going pretty quickly.
You play too many videos games, Sergei.
Assuming they actually work as advertised. Given the recent performance of Russian munitions I would not bet that it will work to specs.
@@keving454 and you’re probably right. But betting a missile with a 1000 km range doesn’t work as stated is taking a big risk when your missile only goes 190 km.
US already has one. US Army received its 1st LRHW prototype battery since October 2021. “Today marks an important milestone in equipping our nation’s first hypersonic battery,” said Lt. Gen. L. Neil Thurgood. A 2nd battery is in the works for 2025 and a 3rd one for 2027. 1st battery is currently deployed at Cape Canaveral to undergo personnel training and field testing though no successful launch yet. It is also light enough to be carried by a C-17 Globemaster. Once landed it can launch its missile similar to M142 HIMARS. Japan already agreed to host them.
On the other hand Zumwalt class destroyers already started its modifications this year removing its guns so that it can accommodate a larger VLS able to house CPS. It will also be carried by the upcoming Virginia class Block V subs by 2028. If both will be used for anti-ship role only time will tell. Then their is also the upcoming MAKO though US don't lack anti-ship capabilities especially with stealthy LRASM. However they prefer air assets for anti-ship purposes as it can serve both an ISR and launching platform.
No views in 44 seconds? Bro fell off🤷🏻♂️
Long live mother Russia!!!
This channel has gone to garbage