Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark-V Field v/s Yaesu FT-2000 - Reception Comparison on 14 MHz
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2020
- Both the Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark-V Field and the Yaesu FT-2000 are high-end amateur radio transceivers that were designed and manufactured by Yaesu. Here is a brief comparison of the two models:
Frequency Range: Both radios cover a wide frequency range. The FT-1000MP Mark-V Field has a frequency coverage of 160 to 6 meters (plus 2 meters with an optional module), while the FT-2000 has frequency coverage of 160 to 6 meters (plus 2 meters and 70 centimeters with optional modules).
Power Output: The FT-1000MP Mark-V Field has a maximum power output of 200 watts, while the FT-2000 has a maximum power output of 200 watts on HF and 100 watts on VHF and UHF.
Receiver Performance: The FT-2000 has a slightly better receiver performance, with a third-order dynamic range of 104 dB compared to the FT-1000MP Mark-V Field's 100 dB.
DSP Technology: Both radios have built-in digital signal processing (DSP) technology, but the FT-2000's DSP system is more advanced and includes features like noise reduction and auto-notch filtering.
User Interface: The FT-2000 has a larger and more advanced user interface, with a color LCD display and more advanced menu options.
In summary, the Yaesu FT-2000 is a newer and more advanced transceiver than the FT-1000MP Mark-V Field. It has a better receiver performance, more advanced DSP technology, and a larger and more advanced user interface. However, the FT-1000MP Mark-V Field is still a highly regarded and capable transceiver, and many radio enthusiasts prefer its user interface and classic design. Ultimately, the choice between these two radios will depend on the user's specific needs and preferences. - Наука та технологія
Not sure what I am hearing. Different speakers, microphone definitely favouring the 1kMP. Also, are filters he same? Sound as if the 2k had a narrower filter. I know that the 1k has a better receiver than the 2k, but it shouldn't be so much different IMHO. 73 de HA5XA
Thanks for comments, Well there is visible difference and builtin soeakers been used from the transceivers and no filtering at all same audio settings and volume level with same antenna. 73s
Interesting comparsion. There is a difference. TNX
Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
Supervideo.Yhankns you very much.
you are welcome
Big difference. That ft2000 is deaf. One would think that a more recent radio is better on receive..
Well I think FT2000 has less high frequency output as its builting speaker delivers more lower frequency sound than the higher pitches. With an external speaker sound is much of all range with more high pitch sound output. That Many amateurs note with the FT-2000. Yaesu has use different built-in speaker that FT-1000MP in my opinion. But you noted difference very well. BTW Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
I like most yaesu transceivers. I have FT-950, FT-1000MP, FT-1000MP V Field and FT-2000. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The best sounding transceiver I have is a FT101B from the 1970s.
I agree FT101B & 101E are better sounding transceivers with less bells & whistles of modern radios. Yaesu indeed has a certain class but Icom & Kenwood are bit different in otherways
Mark V analog wins again. The 2000 Generation wasnt good. The best of all time. 1000D. Still the king.
I can not agree more you just nailed it. Best 73s
Which is better in your opinion, the FT1000D or the FT1000MKV?
Сначала надо создать одинаковые условия , потом делать выводы .