Ex wives should get NOTHING!! Not a penny. The man should put money in a trust for the kids. Then give it to them later. But the woman gets nothing. Not a nickel. Not a penny.
@@stanhankins3175 That's bs. First of all she carried the children not the man. It was her body that changed it was her that squeezed the child out. So you think the wear and tear and pain deserves nothing. If she has your children pay up and su.
This man just wants some peace. In a few years he can kinda wash his hands of this witch but unfortunately he has to deal with her a few more years. Men , take heed from this terrible situation.
Texas starts with a set precentage 20% for one, 25% for two childern based off the person's income and there can be a request review of the support every three years by either parent which has to differ by either (a) 20% or (b) $100 from the amount that would be awarded. The support can go up or down depending the W2(s) shown, they should have stopped her before having this court hearing, total waste of time. She tried using property value as a source of income, that was a huge unguided strech.
I'm not saying this woman is right or wrong but I will say it's no worse than a man hiding income. Say someone working under the table so they don't have to pay as much. Both are wrong so don't just slam her without recognizing the BS men do too.
for someone who doesnt know much about his income she seems to know an awful lot -or thinks she does see ya all again next month for part 97 because Mama Greedy aint givin up and what kind of health insurance is $300/month for one kid???
Ex wives should get NOTHING!! Not a penny. The man should put money in a trust for the kids. Then give it to them later. But the woman gets nothing. Not a nickel. Not a penny.
@@stanhankins3175 That's bs. First of all she carried the children not the man. It was her body that changed it was her that squeezed the child out. So you think the wear and tear and pain deserves nothing. If she has your children pay up and su.
This man just wants some peace. In a few years he can kinda wash his hands of this witch but unfortunately he has to deal with her a few more years. Men , take heed from this terrible situation.
Texas starts with a set precentage 20% for one, 25% for two childern based off the person's income and there can be a request review of the support every three years by either parent which has to differ by either (a) 20% or (b) $100 from the amount that would be awarded. The support can go up or down depending the W2(s) shown, they should have stopped her before having this court hearing, total waste of time. She tried using property value as a source of income, that was a huge unguided strech.
You’re wrong, it’s not always based on income. Income can be imputed if it is found that he is under earning.
I'll watch if you just let it play. Can't do it with the constant interruptions.
Yes. Stop constantly interrupting. Carry on.
I'm not saying this woman is right or wrong but I will say it's no worse than a man hiding income. Say someone working under the table so they don't have to pay as much. Both are wrong so don't just slam her without recognizing the BS men do too.
23k a year is nothing. Good grief. Children are incredibly expensive.
@@mpettway6982 it's support, she should be adding 23k aswell. 46k a year is enough to support a child.
@@mpettway6982 Then HE should have the kids.
@mpettway6982 agreed, but $46k is enough. Like if she contributed her fair share, like the feminist have been fighting for!
Texas has a cutoff.
for someone who doesnt know much about his income she seems to know an awful lot -or thinks she does see ya all again next month for part 97 because Mama Greedy aint givin up
and what kind of health insurance is $300/month for one kid???
GET A JOB LADY