@@juandeleon1665 Read your scriptures. Your response is a perfect example of why women should not teach in the church. Read Hebrews 8:13: In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
If the church is brought into the New Covenant through Jesus and the church can now claim Abraham as their father through Jesus, then what basis do you have for excluding the Church from receiving every covenental promise that you say belongs only to ethnic Israel? Is genetic identity stronger than spiritual identity?
Salvation and blessing for the whole world. The land is for the Jewish people. Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people whom the covenant was made. That’s why the nations will come to Jerusalem after Christ returns. Equal in the promises of salvation and blessing. But the land is theirs. People seem to think it’s all or nothing. And it’s not. Salvation for all. The land is for the Jewish people.
@@thomasmarchese2808 on what basis is the distinction if gentiles are fellow heirs now? Seems arbitrary to say that the one promise doesn't apply, but all others do
@@thomasmarchese2808 yes, that was the old testament promise - but that is not the final word on the matter. When that promise was given to Abraham, it wasn't understood that God's plan was to break down the wall of hostility between Jews and Gentiles and make them one as Ephesians says.
@@thomasmarchese2808If Jesus wanted to give the Jews the land as a blessing why didn’t he raise an army and expel the Romans, as the Jews wished. Instead Jesus explicitly and intentionally did not do this and kept confronting the Jews with their need for salvation from sin, not political power. This was literally the motivation to kill him! You’re so out of the universe of being on team Jesus you have lost your minds. When you start saying stuff that would put you in league with the murderers of Christ you should really stop and think.
I'm going to do a rebuttal to Dr. Brown in the coming days. I love Dr. Brown and how he extends himself to be graceful to those he disagrees with. He and Dr. White have taught me this - big time! ❤
@yoelcohen7993 Wow! Thanks, I'll consider all that homework when I do my rebuttal. I take it you're not referring to yourself when you say, "Christians read things out of context"?
@yoelcohen7993 I will be arguing for fulfillment Theology. In my short experience dealing with this subject, it's notorious that people of opposing views just can't help speaking passed each other. I'll hopefully get that rebuttal completed within a week. God bless you.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the UA-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
So. The church doesn’t replace Israel. The church is made up of Jews and gentiles. Yes the distinction remains. Just as the same verse speaks of males and females. So the church. Jew and gentile doesn’t negate the promise to the Jewish people for their land. I don’t understand what you’re getting out. That’s the facts. The church. The body of Christ. Jew. Gentile. Male. Female. Distinction remains but discrimination does not. But the land still belongs to and will be to the Jewish people who the promise was given too.
@10:40 Amen 70AD the scatter 1948 AD the gather, how can so many not see this. 2 Peter 3:8 “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
Isaiah 62:1 For Zion’s sake I will not keep silent, And for Jerusalem’s sake I will not keep quiet, Until her righteousness goes forth like brightness, And her salvation like a torch that is burning.
Thank you for answering my question on the call. I thought I may have sounded abrupt when I left the call; my youngest daughter had come over and wanted my attention and your call screener had said to try and keep distractions and loud noises at bay (understandably.)
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
Ppl who argue a replacement theology are saying that Jesus doesn’t have to deliver His final promises to Israel, which is to save them from themselves, ultimately win the war, and finally give them peace when He reigns FROM ISRAEL for 1000 yrs. How do ppl not see this?
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many Christians cannot honestly answer the first three questions below? Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. Watch the UA-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay. =============== Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”? 6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 11. Watch the UA-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
Our Lord Jesus Christ Preached Replacement Theology in Matt 21:43 where He warned the Unbelieving Jews that the Kingdom would be taken from them and given to another Nation which is the Church(1 Peter 2:9). The Church is the True Israel of GOD(Gal 6:16)
Awesome! I'm trying to keep this short. When I was a young married woman (now I'm an old married woman) I got involved with Jehovah's Witnesses. Their teaching, God was finished with the Jews...they killed the Messiah. 8 years later on brink of having a nervous breakdown, I prayed and asked God to show me if JW's were right or wrong. I began marathon reading beginning in Matthew. Finally I got to Romans 11:25-32 and I couldn't believe what I read. I had one Christian friend that I called and asked her to read it and tell me what she thought it meant. She said the same thing as I believed it was saying. Israel still has a place in God's plan. I repented immediately because I had cast the Jewish nation aside. I love this because this was the very thing that God used to pull me out of that cult. Too many of the verses cannot cross over to the church. It states Israel written to Israel. There are prophecies yet to be fulfilled for the nation of Israel. I hate it also when the salvation verses for the nation of Israel are used to speak of the salvation that God is offering the world right now. Keep on preaching it. May God use you to open the eyes of those who believe otherwise.
I realized that when reading Isaiah 53, the entire chapter is speaking of ISRAEL alone. When Isaiah says our, my, we or people he is obviously speaking of his people, which are obviously Israel ! Most of the verses Christian’s use or apply to them selves from the OT are clearly written, said and promised to Israel. Lol
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
@@DebraCarey-h5t NOPE, Jesus is the only way and He is the root. We are Jesus' body now. Jesus said the real seed of Abraham are those who do his works. Twist Paul to your own destruction. Earthly Jews are in prophecy but MUST believe to be part of God's family.
Michael if by saying Jesus is the temple is wrong, or Jesus is the promise land is wrong now you have gone too far in the other direction. We know Jesus said He is the temple and can be worshipped from anywhere in Spirit & Truth.
Remember we have to consider that it’s by Grace through faith. You see, faith comes first then grace follows. The scriptures make it clear that there is no grace apart from faith. So therefore, we can only conclude that, based off of what scripture says, if a person has no faith unto death, that they are not chosen by Grace therefore, they are not chosen by God. This includes both Jew and Gentile. Ephesians. Chapter 2. Hebrews chapter 11 James, chapter 2 Revelation, chapter 2 Genesis chapter 6, verse 8 and 9 (what made Noah righteous? His faith.) Genesis Chapter 15 verse 6 God is the same yesterday, today and forevermore. May God bless you and keep you And may his countenance shine upon you.
You say the church should honour their Jewish roots, but also say gentiles don’t have to keep the commands. So I don’t have to circumcise my son, keep kosher, keep sabbath or keep the feasts and festivals even though my saviour Yeshua did? When I read that I’m grafted into the existing faith-what am I supposed to do throughout the year-celebrate Christmas and Easter? I want to learn about my history and understand the ways of the father and his perfect instruction in Torah. Please help me understand how to live like Yeshua by honouring Gods perfect way and not man made tradition in the church or in Judaism.
Paul says most of the jewish ceremonial laws are null void now, the civil laws could be applied maybe idk on that one but the Moral Laws are still someone to follow in Faith. I think it's not that complicated in following Christ, Early Church actually said Keep the Sabbath and the Lord's Day which we kinda already do by having a 2 day weekend for rest. Circumcision is not needed since Baptism fulfills it, Kosher is not needed as is said to Peter that what is unclean is made clean. I would say(maybe biasedly lol) to follow a Reformed tradition of Faith but ultimately you can look to Church History and honestly in the spirit and you'll find it. Idk if this really helped at all but I hope so:)
@@pink_kino ok. So. The law is a while. The Bible does not break it up. There’s no separation. The early church also did not say that. They said that gentiles don’t have to convert to Judaism. “No Jew or gentile” also says no male or female. It’s not about distinctions. It’s about discrimination. Jewish people have their heritage. Gentiles don’t have to become “Jewish” or convert to Judaism.
@@thomasmarchese2808 it is about distinctions, since it also says neither slave nor master. It's all about the distinctions you find in the world not mattering in Christ and we're all brothers in Christ. The Jews who forced Gentiles to become Jews were teaching another Gospel as the old law with it's ceremonies have been fulfilled in Christ we have a new circumcision in Baptism. Also there is Threefold Levitical codes Moral, Civil and Ceremonial like obviously, there is no idea of separate churches and synagogues in the early church it was all one body in Christ not two separate unconnected bodies
Jesus has two flocks? Ridiculous! There is ONE SHEPHERD of ONE FLOCK says JESUS CHRIST. Messiah Jesus fulfilled all the promises due flesh Israel at the Cross. The everlasting promises outstanding belong to all people, of all nations, who will believe and follow Jesus Christ: (John 10:16) *_And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring,_* and they shall hear my voice; and *_there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd._* (Luke 24:44) And he said unto them, These [are] the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that *_all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and [in] the prophets, and [in] the psalms, concerning me._* (Gal 6:15) For *_in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature._* (Gal 6:16) And *_as many as walk according to this rule,_* peace [be] on them, and mercy, and upon *_the Israel of God._* (Rom 4:16) For this reason *_[it is] by faith,_* ... *_that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham,_* who is the father of us all, (Rom 9:6) … *_For they [are] not all Israel, which are of Israel:_* (Rom 10:12) *_For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek;_* for the same [Lord] is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him; (Matt 23:37) _O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, [thou] that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee,_ ... (Matt 23:38) *_Behold, your house is left unto you desolate._*
But my understanding is that the prior promise (prior to the law) is the original promise of salvation that was and is fulfilled in Jesus Christ. He regathers the Jewish people in his mercy through Jesus Christ I don’t think he does that apart from the ekklesia, it is WITH and IN the ekklesia for all time. The gentiles have been grafted into Israel and Judah, we are adopted into them, not replacing them. Why is this offensive?
@@theeternalsbeliever1779 the promise begins with Genesis 3 and continues from there. Then the promise to Abraham then to Judah then to David. All those have been fulfilled in Christ and the covenant of the law has been abolished. There were never promises of salvation in that covenant only of going into the land (type for presence of God) if they obeyed and exile from the land (type for presence of God) if they disobeyed the law. By the prior promise I mean prior to the law not the promise in the law.
Correct see Hebrews 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
@ 6:25 Jesus Christ 1st gave the Truth unto the Jewish people after his resurrection the Gospel was taken unto the gentiles. The Jewish people will start and even now are coming to receive Jesus Christ as their Promised Messiah. But remember: Matthew 20:16 “So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.”
@Yoel Cohen Many do not understand God's way of time as we see in Psalms 90:4 “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.” and 2 Peter 3:8 “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
It's not a replacement. In Revelation 12, there is ONLY ONE woman that represents God's people before the cross and after the cross. Galatians 3:29 makes abundantly clear, it has ALWAYS ONLY been those living by faith in Christ who have ever been heir to God's promises. Just being born a Jew in the flesh, is not worth anything in God's sight. Jesus is true Israel (Matt. 2:15; Hos. 11:1). In Christ, I am a true Israelite and heir to the promises made to Abraham, and instead of just a little piece of land in the Middle East, God has promised this whole earth, made completely brand new, as my inheritance! Until that time, God is calling each of His children to go throughout the world to proclaim the gospel. He is not calling His people into a little country in the Middle East. He plans to have His glory fill the whole earth! Please also read Matt. 21:42,43; Rom. 9:4-8; Gal. 3:7; and Eph. 2:11-14.
At 17:40 a Christian father calls in about circumcision from a rabbi. Dr. Brown's bias clouds his theology. Dr. Brown says "great" "beautiful" "wonderful" and "give thanks to God." The Apostle Paul gave very different advice in Galatians 5:2-4 "2 Look: I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you. 3 I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision that he is obligated to keep the whole law. 4 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified[a] by the law; you have fallen away from grace."
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
5:37 That would be like telling a starving person, "Oh, Jesus is the bread of life." John 6:26, 27 26 Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled. 27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
I agree with you about replacement theology. Regarding antisemitism in the church, most of the antisemitism done in the name of Christ was done by people who also would’ve persecuted most evangelical Christians even worse. For example, compare Luther’s support for the killing of anyone who held to believer’s baptism versus his call for oppressing Jews. How would an Anabaptist murdered with the approval of Luther be culpable for Luther’s antisemitism? Or how would a Baptist today who supports restoration theology have any connection to Luther’s antisemitism?
@user-sd8do5qf1h I'm praying for you. I'm glad you shared your struggle. Something to keep in mind is we wouldn't want to be judged by the worst in our racial or religious groups (and neither Epstein nor Maxwell seemed to be even observant.) And, of course, most Jews would be disgusted at what they did. Regarding antisemitism, someone said, the devil is happy as long as we're hating people. (Of course, Epstein and Maxwell should be judged for what they did, and we should care most for their victims.) The Lord Jesus said, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", and "Love your neighbor as yourself". We would want God to be kind and merciful towards us, and turn us from any wrong we are doing. We should pray and seek the same for others. A good piece of advice I got from someone involved in fighting child abuse was to take time to keep yourself going. Spend time with God, friends, gardening, music, good things, exercise, whatever. Don't focus on it so much that it burns you out. Maybe since there's nothing we can really do about Epstein and Maxwell (Though maybe you could support a ministry that helps the innocent who are in similar circumstances?), the best thing for you to do is put it out of your mind and focus on good to build you back up? Don't let the devil use them to make you his victim. And remember, God is the just judge who will judge all people justly. And what we do for God, like evangelism, is powerful, and lasts forever. Again, thanks for your comment. I'm praying for you.
@user-sd8do5qf1h Thanks for your response. I will try to address the three points you brought up. The Mossad connection with Epstein and Maxwell: I have not researched this much, But I see why people think there may be a connection. But I would note that Robert Barnes, a conservative lawyer, who often argues for behind the scenes/conspiracies that are going on, does not see a connection. But even if there is a connection, it's not like it's really the only country doing bad things like this. The spy business is a dirty game. Also, note how the United States treated Epstein and Maxwell for the last 15 to 20 years. It looks like the United States had some sort of connection to them. I can hate something my country does, or what another country does, without hating my country or another country. Jewish pedophiles immigrating to Israel to escape prosecution: yes, this does happen, and it is a bad thing. One thing I appreciate about our interaction is you're pointing out and hating very, very bad things. But note, some do you get sent back and you will find Israeli newspapers online condemning the immigration policy that permits this to happen. Yes, this is a very, very bad thing. But again, Israel's not the only country with problems like this. Look at how the “grooming gangs” were treated in England, the marriage age in some Muslim countries, abuse of boys in Afghanistan, and United States permitting an open border for decades, which permits human, including child, trafficking. These are all things we should hate, but I don't see that Israel is unique here. Christian supporting Israel: I'm not sure what you mean here. We should pray for Israel, and pray for other countries. I think we should especially pray for Israel, because they are still God's chosen people (And then use this heightened prayer focus for Israel to heighten our prayer for others, too.). I can see an argument against the United States giving them financial aid, as Israel has a surplus, and we are in deep debt with a deficit. But I do think we should be fair in judgment, and not condemn Israel for bad things they do while turning a blind eye to others who do the same. Whatever countries or people we do support, our first allegiance should be to God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ and His Gospel. And I go to a church with people involved in Jewish evangelism and that supports Jewish evangelism (Along with supporting evangelism to many other countries and locally, too.)
I have a cousin who thinks we are the real Isrealites, and she is unwilling to yield to biblical truth that clearly debunks that false ideology. Where and when can I see this debate?
Matthew 8:11-12 [11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
65-80 Million human beings died in WWII, many different ethnicities, races, nationalities and religions, from many countries. 25-40 Million human beings died in WWI, and Millions more before during, and after these two world wars. It is time to teach our children and all citizens of the world, that every single human life lost is equally tragic and each life is equally valuable. All genocides and holocausts and intentional famines and oppressions must be taught to all people in the future. To learn who rules over you, find out who you cannot criticize, and who gets all the attention and sympathy. Who controls the media, controls the culture, and the minds of all people. Who controls the media?
That thinking is exactly what let normal civilised German people into being tricked into murdering teachers, shop owners, bakers, musicians, dancers, WWI vets, mothers, fathers, children, babies. The lie that somehow these Jews were in control and were running the world and causing all the problems. These people were not even their enemies and died for their country just 20 years earlier. They were murdered because of who they descended from.
Acts 21:20-21 is a watershed regarding the Abrahamic covenant and circumcision. I’m not sure if Paul actually told the Jews to not circumcise their children. However, I am sure that he told them that if they did it would have no effect on their child’s relationship to God, it would profit them nothing. Their boys would not become one of God’s people because they were circumcised according to the requirements of the Abrahamic Covenant! This infuriated the Jews who trusted in circumcision. The fact that the New Testament abolishes circumcision in the flesh for ethnic Jews and Gentile proselytes makes it clear that we cannot treat ethnic Jews today as if the Abrahamic covenant has continued unaltered in regard to them. An ethnic Jew today cannot rightfully claim to be one of “God’s people” based upon the Abrahamic covenant and neither should we be telling them that they hold this status before God. If the Abrahamic covenant is now fulfilled in the New covenant with Israel, and it is, then the “My people” status for Jews and Gentiles flows only from the New covenant. To be outside of the New covenant, whether Jew or Gentile, leaves one as “not My people”. Dispensationalists have failed to understand that it is covenantal membership that conveys the special status of being “My people”, not ethnicity or physical descent (this has always been the case in both Old or New covenant eras!).
Covenant is so denigrated by Nico (clergy) and Laitins (laity, common folk in the assembly of the Nicos) alike - In Genesis 15:17, we see that YHWH is making Covenant with Abraham - the smoking furnace and a burning Lamp passes between the pieces! HalleluYAHSHUA - He Is Eternal
There's no replacement theology. The church doesn't replace Israel: it is the continuation of Israel. That's what the scripture indicates. The modern nation of physical Israel is like any other pagan nation that doesn't know Christ and needs to hear the gospel.
That makes no sense. The land was promised to the Jewish people. Non Jews. Us. Get the blessing of salvation and eternal life. But the land is theirs. And will be theirs. It’s not all or nothing.
@@thomasmarchese2808The point of having the land was to build what? To squat there and have gay sex in clubs in Tel Aviv? That’s what God and Jesus promised? That was the point? This one ethnic tribe gets to squat on this dirt for all time and sodomize each other? Get a grip you fool. The point of the covenant was to inhabit the land and build a Temple so God would be present with his people, it was to restore what was lost in Eden. But Israel failed to follow the covenant as they having been doing continuously since the time of Christ and that’s why they are cursed and don’t have a temple or priesthood.
@@thomasmarchese2808 the new testament explains that the Israelites passing through the Red Sea is our baptism; the wine and oil in the Old Testament are the Holy Spirit poured out; the temple is both Jesus' physical body and the collective of believers; circumcision is separation of oneself from the acts of sin; and the Sabbath is resting in Christ and putting aside one's evil works; the Old Testament sacrifices are symbols of Jesus slain; and the true Jew or Israelite is the one who by faith applies the blood of lamb to his life. Why then do you think the physical land of Israel is of any import to Christians beyond any other nation? If the physical land in the Middle East more important than the earth of which we are made, where God has put his fingerprint and into which he breathes his Spirit? I dare saying, there is no land more holy than the land that Jesus took in his hands to fashion a human, be that person "Palestinian" or Hebrew. No, my friend, you are being taken captive by heresy: you are reading the New Testament through the lens of the Old and not the Old through the land of the New.
The United States pays for 20% of Israel's military budget while Israel has a space program, universal health care, and still runs a budget surplus for six of the last ten years....
I'm @ 5:31 into this video and will watch the rest. My question here @5.31 We we are reborn in Christ we become children of the Kingdom of Heaven. As I read in Revelation 21:2 “And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” Then we read in Revelation 21:22 “And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.” As for me Jesus Christ is my Holy Place for he is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Amen.
“Prepared as a bride” is simply descriptive of how a bride is adorned. I’m not sure the anaology is that the city replaces the temple or that the city is the bride. I’m also not sure the city and the temple are ever regarded as being synonymous. There was Jerusalem but within Jerusalem there was a temple. Are you suggesting the definitions of bride has change to a city? Or that Jesus (Yeshua) is adorned for God? That would be an interesting take on the Trinity. We understand that the eklessia is the bride (the body of believers) but is the city now the bride? If so, Are you saying that God adorned the city (the new bride) for Himself? Cause I’m pretty sure we’ve been taught that God is spoken of as the husband in the Old and New Testament. You’re definitely not saying that the saints in heaven are part of the bride and are coming down in the vision because you’ve already stated that Jesus is your literal city and kingdom. Please elaborate. Thanks.
@@essenceofgrowing7804 What we clearly see from scripture is the fact that Jesus Christ is the Temple of God not made by the hands of man. Jesus is the Word of God that was made Flesh by the power of the Holy Spirit. The Father and Holy Spirit both indwelled with in Jesus Christ as his walked on this earth with his chosen apostles as we read in John 14: 5 - 11 5: Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way? 6: Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. 7: If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. 8: Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9: Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? 10: Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. 11: Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.
@@JohnReon Not sure that you actually addressed my question with regards to how you symbolically make Yeshua the future third temple (that we see in scripture will again be defiled), or how you see Yeshua as the city (the new Jerusalem with all its promised dimensions), or how you see Yeshua returning to be the bride of YHVH (as if YHVH dwelled here below but Yeshua dwelled above). I mentioned that the way you’re seeing this is an interesting take on the trinity. I guess we could try to sort out what (in scripture) is supposed to be seen as literal and what is supposed to be seen as merely symbolic and less literal. Lots of books have already been written on biblical symbolism and hyper literalism. I don’t think we should do that. We’d be here for weeks and it probably wouldn’t be fruitful. So maybe it really is a discussion on the trinity we should to have. That too can also be very daunting. Anyway… I believe in the trinity but, you know as well as I do, or at least you should that, people don’t always mean the same thing when they use the word Trinity. Some don’t like to admit it but they actually see polytheism with three distinct physically separated gods walking around and working together in unity in heaven. You figure this out when you start asking them specific question about the trinity. They don’t actually see God (a being) becoming flesh. They see it as only one of the three, namely Jesus (iesus or Yeshua), becoming a man. This is the same reason why some don’t see that Yeshua was the Word of God (scriptures) made flesh. This has something to do with their inability to recognize Gods omnipresence. For example: His manifest presence in the temple (in the Holy of Holies) but yet still lives outside of His creation. Christian polytheism doesn’t really thing YHVH and YESHUA (Jesus) are the same being. Christian polytheism thinks and teaches that if you went to heaven that you’d see three different distinct physical gods. Then in order to claim that they are true trinitarian they argue that these gods will spiritually operate as one entity (like a husband and wife are two distinct people but in a spiritual sense that are regarded as one). And then others see God as a class of being, and angels as another class, humans another and animals another, insects in another classification of being, etc. I’m consider myself Trinitarian. When I hear “God is one” (echad) I don’t think this intends to communicate to us that there is a polytheism going on in the heavens within the classification of being, God. With that said, let me get back on subject: Are you saying that the temple that was in the heavens, the details of which Moses received, that which the earthly temple was a copy of, that this was altogether a temple, a city and also Yeshua all along? If Yeshua is the Word made flesh only symbolically but we have a Christian polytheism of the godhead…. How can some square that idea that YHVH is adorning Yeshua for Himself? I’m pretty sure that is not classical Trinity. Are then really saying that you actually believe the earthly temple, the details that Moses received, was Yeshua and not actually a copy of heavenly literal temple? I think the Torah (the first five books) teaches that the earthly temple, though tangible, is merely a copy of the literal in heaven, right? Or maybe you you’re saying Solomon took the dimensions hyper literal and built something that he should have not was not to be taken literal. The ekkelsia in the first few centuries brought in some very interesting gentile characters. Some of which were secular and some pagan, and some that were Gnostic. The gnostics cause some serious problems. They would attempt to allegorize everything in a dualistic platonic manner cause they saw physical reality is corrupt. They would eventually go on to allegorize the Shabbat just so that wouldn’t (and couldn’t) physically rest on Shabbat, or to prevent themselves from looking Jewish, or because allegorizing scripture seemed to be a pious thing to do. There was also syncretism at play which the gentiles were already very familiar with doing. There was also a misunderstanding what Paul wrote and also a lack of understanding of the prophetic- symbolic and literal language- found in the Tanakh. I think we need to remember that the temple destruction was predicted long before Yeshua came and was destroyed out of judgment (just like the first temple was). Prophecy in the Tanak speaks of a messiah that would be zealous for the temple. Yeshua was angry of the corruption taking place in the temple for a very good reason. The house of prayer- The house of YHVH- was being used in a corrupt manner. Cities and temple are not equivalent. Scripture never speaks of them as being the same. Is also don’t see that YHVH (the father) is the Husband of Yeshua (with being the son and bride). Man is class of being. Those of us of faith, both the natural branches and those grated in, make up the body. The body needs to be dressed in white (purity) LIKE a bride. LIKE! Descriptive. Just like the word AS. The Greek word for “like” and “as” is the same. This reminds me of a few discussions I’ve had with some BHI. The Black Hebrew Israelites are a groups of American black people who think they are the real Jews and that the Jewish people in Israel are fake. I won’t get into all their nonsense right now. You can look them up but they will argue that Yeshua was black. In the book of revelations that see Yeshua with white curly hair like the white curly hair of a sheep. We know this doesn’t mean Yeshua will have sheep hair. Sheep hair is curly and it is white. It’s descriptive. They’ll say this verse described Yeshua as having curly hair like a black person that is old. Interesting thing is that some sheep have straight hair. Not all sheep have white hair. So I guess I’m trying to point out that this city being adorned as a wife is NOT saying the city is a wife. The people in the city is what is always spoken of as the bride. The word “as” is merely descriptive. The class of beings, the human kind, the class in which Yeshua became like man to redeem, which is the class below the class of angels, those of faith, this is the class of beings spoken of as a bride. Understanding this doesn’t diminish the work of Yeshua. It certainly doesn’t diminish His beauty. And it think hermeneutically it’s much more consistent. What are your thoughts?
@@essenceofgrowing7804 Many of your questions can be answered if you read: Acts 17:24-32 as it is written. 24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; 25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; 27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us: 28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. 29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. 30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: 31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead. 32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter. Also read all of Isaiah Chapter 55 Then read Psalms Chapter 77 And for the fullness of understanding of what you have read. Matthew Chapter 7 Verse 7
It seems to me you're mixing your messages of predestination and election. You don't believe in there being elect Gentiles by God's effectual grace (Church), but you believe in God's effectual grace for physical Israel. Am I misunderstood in your position?
@Yoel Cohen Matt 19:28-30 says whose going to sit and judge the 12 tribes of Israel. Hebrews 8:13 says "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." The old covenant died with Christ on the Cross, and finalized in the destruction of the physical temple in 70 A.D. Israel is and has always been the elect from Israel and Gentiles. All of the elect in Christ, both Israel and Gentiles, were guaranteed forgiveness of their sins from Adam to today. Israel is Christ. That's my position.
@Yoel Cohen Also, regarding the 144k. These were taken from men before they defiled themselves with women. They're NOT on earth, they're n heaven. Revelation 14:4 KJVS These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
@Yoel Cohen My confusion from Dr. Brown is that he discounts the texts that show there's both Jews and Gentiles, individuals, that are elected for receiving the atonement, but then states that the LORD is going to arbitrarily "save" physical Israel. You see my confusion in this being a mixed message?
@Yoel Cohen I appreciate all the texts. ALL was fulfilled in the law when Christ rose from the grave. Christ "is the end of the law" to everyone who believes. Romans 3:30 implies a dual predestination of election. The Jews through the faith OF Christ and Gentiles by faith OF Christ in the present. My take anyways
@Yoel Cohen ALL those born again by the will and grace of God alone through the faith, works, shed blood, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ alone are Israel. Jews and Gentiles.
I hope the Sons of the Kingdom enjoy wheeping and gnashing their teeth I guess? Why anyone would want to be thrown into the outer darkness is beyond me. Matthew 8:11-12 [11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Joh 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. If there is only one fold, what is that fold called? Israel won't be saved until they come to Jesus. And when they come to Jesus they are the church. So yes, the only Israel is the church. Church is the collective of all who are called to follow Jesus. We are all one in Christ Jesus. Mt 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. Joh 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. Mt 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 25 Behold, I have told you before. 26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. That physical "nation of Israel" is all about antichrist, because that is the kind of messiah they are looking for. The true Israel will be fulfilled when Jesus returns. The messianic kingdom was never about this flesh. It was always spirit. And you were never going to live forever anyway, unless you come through Jesus, who is the only way, truth and eternal life. Everyone who believes that Jesus is the messiah is Israel. No one who doesn't believe that Jesus is the messiah is Israel. Therefore, when the last person who will come to belief in Jesus, comes to belief in Jesus, then all Israel will be saved. When Jesus said, "Ye must be born again, or you cannot see the kingdom of God", he was explaining the resurrection. We had to be born to come into this physical world. We will have to be "born again" in the resurrection to come into the kingdom of God. Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. 4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born? 5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water (physical birth, born) and of the Spirit (resurrected, born again), he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. 6 That which is born of the flesh IS flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit IS spirit. We are still flesh (dust), we are not yet spirit. 7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. 8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. 9 Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be? We are not yet like the wind. 1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 1Co 15:54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. Eze 37:11 Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts. 12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, 14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD. "Replacement theology" is one of those disparaging distinctions thrown around to dismiss an idea without debate, like "anti-semite" and "conspiracy theorist." The church is Israel, and is the fulfillment of the promises God made to Adam and Noah and Abraham and Israel and Moses. Not a replacement at all, but a fulfillment and inclusion. The final fulfillment is to be accomplished in the millennial kingdom. His kingdom is not of this world. Any "apparent" fulfillment in this present world is an antichrist counterfeit. The messianic prophecies were always meant to be fulfilled in the first resurrection and in the millennial kingdom. A remnant is a very small leftover from a much larger whole. All Israel will only be saved in a remnant. The Jewish misunderstanding that the messianic kingdom would be fulfilled in this present time and among the physical nation of Israel was always wrong. Which is why they rejected Him the first time. Joh 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. (KJV) Ro 11:4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. 5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. All we believers, Jews and Greeks, will be revived and rule with Christ on the third day. (Ho 6:1-3) There is no "church age". That is not found in the Bible. Ga 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. This idea people have of separating gentile believers from Jewish believers is unbiblical. Unbelieving Jews won't be saved anyway. Neither will unbelieving gentiles. The moment you believe you are no longer gentile. There is no gentile church. There is only an Israel church with whom gentiles have been blessed to conjunct. Joh 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. Mt 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. John the baptizer Ga 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but AS OF ONE, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. Ga 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, TILL THE SEED SHOULD COME to whom the promise was made; Lu 3:9 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit (belief in Jesus) is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent. Mt 8:11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Ro 9:26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God. 27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved: 28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth. 29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha.
The complete fulfillment will be in the first resurrection. Eze 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves, 14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD. Ro 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. Ro 9:6 ¶ Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. Ro 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 26 And so all Israel shall be saved: Most people think that gentile means any people who aren't Jews. But gentile means heathen, and heathen are people who don't know the true God. Even the people we call Jews, those who reject Jesus, are heathen or gentile. So even the unbelieving Jews are gentiles treading down the holy city. The scripture could be translated this way: Lu 21:24...: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the unbelievers, until the times of the unbelievers be fulfilled. Just as God changed Jacob's name to Israel, He changes our name to Israel when we believe in Jesus. Everyone who believes in Jesus is Israel. No one else is. Therefore, "all Israel shall be saved." Strong's Concordance 03478. Israel, Yisra'el, yis-raw-ale' : he will rule as God. Re 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: 27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. Ga 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek (gentile), there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. There are not two different churches and there are not two different Israels. We are all one in Christ Jesus. Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
The only way replacement theology makes sense, would be if you threw out the Bible and wrote your own. When Jesus spoke he was speaking to Jews, and in Revelation many of the end times prophecies the Jews play a major role in, this is not even ambiguous.
Matthew 8:10-12 [10] When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, “Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such faith. [11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
"Replacement theology" as a synonym for supersessionism is an unjustifiably stupid and inaccurate terminology. Disagreement is fine, but there's no replacement going on in supersessionism- it involves grafting of gentiles into promises that faithful Jews are heirs of. No one gets replaced. Even if supersessionism is wrong, that doesn't mean it postulates a replacement.
ERROR! Israel and the church are NOT separate! The replacement theology accusation presupposes that the church is a gentile entity and it is NOT! Peter James and John and the other disciples did not stop being ISRAEL to become THE CHURCH-- They were in fact TRUE ISRAEL with their Jewish Jeremiah 31 New covenant NOW INCLUDING ALL GENTILES that believe in Christ by faith. In Christ's body on the cross he made the two ONE. Christ has made the twain (Jew and gentile) ONE NEW MAN and they share EQUAL inheritance and our co-heirs with Christ according to the scriptures. This teaching proclaims that Israel and the church are separate when Christ Jesus died making ONE NEW MAN and that is by faith alone. There are NO exclusionary promises OUTSIDE OF Christ and HE IS The HEAD of the Church with the ONLY Preeminence! The KINGDOM and the earth and it's fullness ESPECIALLY ISRAEL-- belong to the LORD Scriptures for this can be found in Galatians 3 Ephesians 2-3 Colossians 1-2 Romans 9 through 11
New Covenant Whole Gospel: Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. Why did Peter address the crowd on the Day of Pentecost as "men of Judea", and as "men of Israel", and as "all the house of Israel", when about 3,000 Israelites accepted the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary? There were no Gentiles in the Church until several years later. Why did Paul still consider himself an Israelite, even after his conversion, in Romans 11:1? Who are the faithful "remnant" of Israel in Romans 11:5 during Paul's time? Watch the UA-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
First, I do not hold replacement theology. I have brought the gospel to Jewish people you know personally. The New Covenant has been gentilized to mean saved and going to heaven. Yet Jesus spoke of eternal life in him something the law and the prophets did not proclaim or give by the law. The New Covenant is Christ in you the HOPE of glory (heaven). So it seems that you maintain the covenant of Moses is still in effect today. That is not what Paul taught to us gentiles. The New Covenant invests in our persons the indwelling Father Son and Holy Spirit. John 14:23. It seems you miss Ezekiel 36:25-27, Jeremiah 31:31 etc. The New Covenant reveals the eternal life via indwelling of Christ. You have mixed the gentilization of the New Covenant with the Judizer view of the completed law. Neither is correct. I am staggered that the word is not clear to you. Having begun in the spirit are we now made perfect in the flesh (law). Jesus incorporated the blessing to the Israelites of YHWH dwelling in their midst with the personal regeneration and indwelling of the Holy Spirit via the redemption blood of the Christ. See, Deuteronomy 23:14, Leviticus 26:12, Isaiah 63:11, Numbers 35:33 etc. You should know this!
Earthly Israel must come into line with Heavenly Israel, God's will be done on earth as heaven. Is that bad to say? Any people that are racist against Israel or think Jesus will not fight for the remnant that will believe in Him are wrong.
The Jews as a group are defined by rejection of Christ. The state of Israel does not consider ethnically Jewish people who convert to Christianity to be Jews for purposes of Israeli citizenship. Israel is a Satanic Jewish Supremacist terrorist state that Jesus will destroy if he were to return now.
If someone who is not a Jew calls him/herself a Jew, isn't that replacement theology. Similarly, if some people are learning and speaking Hebrew, aren't they practising replacement theology? Help me answer thses 2 questions. Warning: If spammers who pretend to be @AskDrBrown sends answer, I will delete this comment.
Replacement theology is only a term they made up against people who believe that The Church and Israel have no distinction. that True Israel is Christ always. This argument is only a part of a bigger argument between Dispensationalism and some form of Covenant Theology
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
Jesus said my sheep hear my voice. He was regathering the lost sheep 2000yrs ago. He also separated the obedient sheep from the stubborn goats. God said only a remnant. Not all Israel is of Israel. Jesus did regather the lost sheep in his mercy. Paul was correct, its not the sons of the flesh, but of the promise that were to be saved. Every single title relating to ancient Israel is given to the church, including gentile Christigiven to another nationans. 1 Peter 2:11 say they are a holy nation. What is the problem God made a choice. The Zionist theft of Palestine is not of God. Its just not a miracle. How else could God say the kingdom will be removed from you and given to another nation producing fruit thereof. Thank God he replaced them as the Zionist project has brought war and unhappiness to all. Many young Jews are reversing their Aliah in disgust. God is no respector of persons means no special favour for Jews.
Hey, I would say that when Scripture says that God shows no favoritism that it is specifically referring to salvation alone. Through Israel salvation will come to world, and that came and comes through Jesus Christ. Even in heaven, God will show some sort of favoritism towards those who had better works; after all, why else should we ever live to store up treasures in heaven? (that is not to say either that anyone who believes and repents is not saved nor that our primary goal as Christians is to store up treasures in heaven). Looking at the end-time prophecies of the in OT (and in Revelation), Israel plays one of the key roles, meaning that the people of Israel will exist as the people of Israel, not solely the Church. This here is more of a personal note: I don't think every title of Israel is given to the Church. Israel is of course the name of Jacob given by God which the Israelites adopted. We are descendants of Abraham by faith, not descendants of Jacob (Israel). For that promise was made to Abraham, not Jacob. That may just be nit-picking though, I'm not quite sure. There are good Jews in Israel who are grateful to their God for the rebirth of their nation. Not all of them are the Zionists of which you spoke. All groups of people will have bad people, especially among those who vie for power. Still, does not God make good things come from the bad? I could be wrong about all this, and I am open to correction. Thanks, and God bless you
There are no Jews who prove their lineage. They lack a genealogy back to Jacob. Ezra used geneologies to seperate the Jews of his day from the alien wives. Prove there is a Jew who can enter his geneology in the temple made by human hands and you will establish the fact.@@harrylong575
Why do you not first focus on the Word who is God who created the Heavens and the Earth who became flesh and dwelt among us, the Only Begotten Son who is in the Bosom of the Father, before the concept of Jews and Gentiles were created , and to as many as received Him to them He gave His power to become the Sons of God. And an old Creation that was totally destroyed except Just Noah who walked with God and totally complied with every command of God, and God made two covenants with, before there were two groups Jews and Gentiles, to prepare you for two groups Jews and Gentiles, or two be more precise , one great nation and the other nations of the world, that are both blessed in Abram in Genesis chapter 12, and this prepares us for the foreordained future of both, centralised in the Son of Abraham and Sarah born from Sarah's dead womb in Romans chapter 4, that Paul says is the meaning of the promise in Genesis chapter 15v6, your seed will be as many as the stars in their multitudes, , but the first promise is the Great Nation of Israel and the Second Promise is all the nations of the world. Both promises are are given to Abraham, they are not in competition to see who wins the ultimate prize of God's predestined purpose, but in there historical sequence Israel is First, and it is their rebellion against the revelation of God in His sent Son , that sets them aside until the second promise to Abraham is fulfilled , when all the nations are blessed in seed of Abraham, but their is a vital missing link in this elementary explanation, and is found in the fact that the Father of all of us fail to see, is that the Man who was promised the promise land never possessed it, He died, but when we come to the letter to the Hebrews chapter 11v8-13, and this was true of Isaac and Jacob, these all died in faith without possessing the promise of God, because their inheritance was in Heaven, the New Jerusalem that belongs to the New Creation
Dr. Brown, exactly who is considered a Jew nowadays? 1% ethnicity? 50%, 90%? Only those living in Israel? Orthodox/Practicing? Which other groups? Etc.??? No one can answer this from Scripture as to who exactly is the one that all the Scriptures would apply to these days. With the temple destroyed in 70 or 90 AD, how are there actual Jews in the religious, Biblical sense? Very confusing teachings everywhere! Do you have a video explaining this better? Thank you.
Jew is just a religious identity not an ethnicity. The religion just has an ethnic component to it because it places infusis on lineage, but that ethnic component only exists because of the religion. As for a Jew without the temple they had no temple in Babylon, and the religion continued to be observed. According to Hosea 14:2 tells us that without a temple prayer fills the void of temple sacrifices. The part of who is considered a Jew nowadays is a bit complicated, because there are different sects of Judaism that do things differently. In most recent history it was anyone who is born to a Jewish mother or converts, but that changed in the last hundred years when the Reform movement changed it to anyone with one Jewish parent who was raised Jewish. The Orthodox didn't agree with that though and stuck to matrilineal descent, even in biblical times it's not really too cut and dry who is a Jew. According to Maimonodes in the Mishna Torah 30:15 he writes that a Jew who rejects the Sabbath is like a goy, yes you heard it a Jew who rejects the Sabbath is a goy. This shows there is no definite way to define a Jew since the meaning clearly has always been ever changing based on circumstances, and social settings of the time periods that Jews have existed. Disclaimer: The word Jew does not mean the tribe of Judah, the first time it is used is in Esther 2:5 referring to Mordecai who is from the tribe of Benjamin.
The promises made to Israel (the chosen people, not the nation/land) WERE rescinded by none other than Jesus in Matthew 21:43 where he said "THE KINGDOM OF GOD SHALL BE TAKEN FROM YOU AND GIVEN TO A NATION BRINGING FORTH THE FRUITS THEREOF." This was said after he cursed the fig tree which bore no fruit. Read the parable of the wicked husbandmen in Matthew 21:33-45 to understand the context and full impact of what Jesus was conveying. Are modern-day Jews in Israel "producing fruit" when they've been systematically killing, destroying and driving out Christians from Palestine and the middle east? Very few Christians who have lived among Muslims for centuries remain today. Dr Brown is a Zionist apologist and therefore cannot be trusted with his man-made dispensationalist theology.
this is funny....people asking questions, getting answers and arguing against it, as if they already knew what they were going to say before they got their answer...hu? its funny seeing it. and not so funny at the same time.. why ask a question, then get the answer then you dont like the answer so you say no!!! loaded questions suck....
When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.
If I make a son then make a new one it does not mean my first born is obsolete
@@juandeleon1665 Read your scriptures. Your response is a perfect example of why women should not teach in the church. Read Hebrews 8:13: In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
@@jarvisnelson4701 yes he made a new covenant with the house of Judah and house of Israel,why don’t you read Roman’s 11
If the church is brought into the New Covenant through Jesus and the church can now claim Abraham as their father through Jesus, then what basis do you have for excluding the Church from receiving every covenental promise that you say belongs only to ethnic Israel? Is genetic identity stronger than spiritual identity?
Salvation and blessing for the whole world. The land is for the Jewish people. Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people whom the covenant was made. That’s why the nations will come to Jerusalem after Christ returns. Equal in the promises of salvation and blessing. But the land is theirs. People seem to think it’s all or nothing. And it’s not. Salvation for all. The land is for the Jewish people.
@@thomasmarchese2808 on what basis is the distinction if gentiles are fellow heirs now? Seems arbitrary to say that the one promise doesn't apply, but all others do
@@asmrjeweler9237because the promise to was all nations came through Abraham. The land was promised to the Jews.
@@thomasmarchese2808 yes, that was the old testament promise - but that is not the final word on the matter. When that promise was given to Abraham, it wasn't understood that God's plan was to break down the wall of hostility between Jews and Gentiles and make them one as Ephesians says.
@@thomasmarchese2808If Jesus wanted to give the Jews the land as a blessing why didn’t he raise an army and expel the Romans, as the Jews wished. Instead Jesus explicitly and intentionally did not do this and kept confronting the Jews with their need for salvation from sin, not political power. This was literally the motivation to kill him! You’re so out of the universe of being on team Jesus you have lost your minds. When you start saying stuff that would put you in league with the murderers of Christ you should really stop and think.
I'm going to do a rebuttal to Dr. Brown in the coming days. I love Dr. Brown and how he extends himself to be graceful to those he disagrees with. He and Dr. White have taught me this - big time! ❤
@yoelcohen7993 Wow! Thanks, I'll consider all that homework when I do my rebuttal. I take it you're not referring to yourself when you say, "Christians read things out of context"?
@yoelcohen7993 I will be arguing for fulfillment Theology. In my short experience dealing with this subject, it's notorious that people of opposing views just can't help speaking passed each other. I'll hopefully get that rebuttal completed within a week. God bless you.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the UA-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
@@SpotterVideo What a post!! thanks for this:)
So. The church doesn’t replace Israel. The church is made up of Jews and gentiles. Yes the distinction remains. Just as the same verse speaks of males and females. So the church. Jew and gentile doesn’t negate the promise to the Jewish people for their land. I don’t understand what you’re getting out. That’s the facts. The church. The body of Christ. Jew. Gentile. Male. Female. Distinction remains but discrimination does not. But the land still belongs to and will be to the Jewish people who the promise was given too.
@10:40 Amen 70AD the scatter 1948 AD the gather, how can so many not see this. 2 Peter 3:8 “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
@12:27 So True as we see how clear this is in Genesis Chapter 12
Isaiah 62:1 For Zion’s sake I will not keep silent,
And for Jerusalem’s sake I will not keep quiet,
Until her righteousness goes forth like brightness,
And her salvation like a torch that is burning.
Thank you for answering my question on the call. I thought I may have sounded abrupt when I left the call; my youngest daughter had come over and wanted my attention and your call screener had said to try and keep distractions and loud noises at bay (understandably.)
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
Ppl who argue a replacement theology are saying that Jesus doesn’t have to deliver His final promises to Israel, which is to save them from themselves, ultimately win the war, and finally give them peace when He reigns FROM ISRAEL for 1000 yrs. How do ppl not see this?
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many Christians cannot honestly answer the first three questions below?
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
Watch the UA-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
===============
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”?
6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
11. Watch the UA-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
Our Lord Jesus Christ Preached Replacement Theology in Matt 21:43 where He warned the Unbelieving Jews that the Kingdom would be taken from them and given to another Nation which is the Church(1 Peter 2:9). The Church is the True Israel of GOD(Gal 6:16)
Awesome! I'm trying to keep this short. When I was a young married woman (now I'm an old married woman) I got involved with Jehovah's Witnesses. Their teaching, God was finished with the Jews...they killed the Messiah. 8 years later on brink of having a nervous breakdown, I prayed and asked God to show me if JW's were right or wrong. I began marathon reading beginning in Matthew. Finally I got to Romans 11:25-32 and I couldn't believe what I read. I had one Christian friend that I called and asked her to read it and tell me what she thought it meant. She said the same thing as I believed it was saying. Israel still has a place in God's plan. I repented immediately because I had cast the Jewish nation aside. I love this because this was the very thing that God used to pull me out of that cult. Too many of the verses cannot cross over to the church. It states Israel written to Israel. There are prophecies yet to be fulfilled for the nation of Israel. I hate it also when the salvation verses for the nation of Israel are used to speak of the salvation that God is offering the world right now. Keep on preaching it. May God use you to open the eyes of those who believe otherwise.
I realized that when reading Isaiah 53, the entire chapter is speaking of ISRAEL alone. When Isaiah says our, my, we or people he is obviously speaking of his people, which are obviously Israel ! Most of the verses Christian’s use or apply to them selves from the OT are clearly written, said and promised to Israel. Lol
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
@@mrmcallister Repent and believe in Jesus Christ to save you from your sins
@@JesusisGodandKingofkimgs that sounds pretty good, but what is sin ?
Michael the Bible says we have a new and better covenant.
Jeremiah 31:33-34 says the New Covenant was/is with Israel. Gentiles are grafted into that New Covenant.
@@DebraCarey-h5t NOPE, Jesus is the only way and He is the root. We are Jesus' body now. Jesus said the real seed of Abraham are those who do his works. Twist Paul to your own destruction. Earthly Jews are in prophecy but MUST believe to be part of God's family.
@@DebraCarey-h5t as it is written all who are of Israel are not Israel, so that proves my point
Michael if by saying Jesus is the temple is wrong, or Jesus is the promise land is wrong now you have gone too far in the other direction. We know Jesus said He is the temple and can be worshipped from anywhere in Spirit & Truth.
Remember we have to consider that it’s by Grace through faith. You see, faith comes first then grace follows. The scriptures make it clear that there is no grace apart from faith. So therefore, we can only conclude that, based off of what scripture says, if a person has no faith unto death, that they are not chosen by Grace therefore, they are not chosen by God. This includes both Jew and Gentile.
Ephesians. Chapter 2.
Hebrews chapter 11
James, chapter 2
Revelation, chapter 2
Genesis chapter 6, verse 8 and 9 (what made Noah righteous? His faith.)
Genesis Chapter 15 verse 6
God is the same yesterday, today and forevermore.
May God bless you and keep you And may his countenance shine upon you.
You say the church should honour their Jewish roots, but also say gentiles don’t have to keep the commands. So I don’t have to circumcise my son, keep kosher, keep sabbath or keep the feasts and festivals even though my saviour Yeshua did? When I read that I’m grafted into the existing faith-what am I supposed to do throughout the year-celebrate Christmas and Easter? I want to learn about my history and understand the ways of the father and his perfect instruction in Torah. Please help me understand how to live like Yeshua by honouring Gods perfect way and not man made tradition in the church or in Judaism.
Paul says most of the jewish ceremonial laws are null void now, the civil laws could be applied maybe idk on that one but the Moral Laws are still someone to follow in Faith.
I think it's not that complicated in following Christ, Early Church actually said Keep the Sabbath and the Lord's Day which we kinda already do by having a 2 day weekend for rest.
Circumcision is not needed since Baptism fulfills it, Kosher is not needed as is said to Peter that what is unclean is made clean.
I would say(maybe biasedly lol) to follow a Reformed tradition of Faith but ultimately you can look to Church History and honestly in the spirit and you'll find it.
Idk if this really helped at all but I hope so:)
@@pink_kino ok. So. The law is a while. The Bible does not break it up. There’s no separation. The early church also did not say that. They said that gentiles don’t have to convert to Judaism. “No Jew or gentile” also says no male or female. It’s not about distinctions. It’s about discrimination. Jewish people have their heritage. Gentiles don’t have to become “Jewish” or convert to Judaism.
@@thomasmarchese2808 it is about distinctions, since it also says neither slave nor master. It's all about the distinctions you find in the world not mattering in Christ and we're all brothers in Christ.
The Jews who forced Gentiles to become Jews were teaching another Gospel as the old law with it's ceremonies have been fulfilled in Christ we have a new circumcision in Baptism.
Also there is Threefold Levitical codes Moral, Civil and Ceremonial like obviously, there is no idea of separate churches and synagogues in the early church it was all one body in Christ not two separate unconnected bodies
Jesus has two flocks? Ridiculous! There is ONE SHEPHERD of ONE FLOCK says JESUS CHRIST. Messiah Jesus fulfilled all the promises due flesh Israel at the Cross. The everlasting promises outstanding belong to all people, of all nations, who will believe and follow Jesus Christ:
(John 10:16) *_And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring,_* and they shall hear my voice; and *_there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd._*
(Luke 24:44) And he said unto them, These [are] the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that *_all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and [in] the prophets, and [in] the psalms, concerning me._*
(Gal 6:15) For *_in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature._*
(Gal 6:16) And *_as many as walk according to this rule,_* peace [be] on them, and mercy, and upon *_the Israel of God._*
(Rom 4:16) For this reason *_[it is] by faith,_* ... *_that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham,_* who is the father of us all,
(Rom 9:6) … *_For they [are] not all Israel, which are of Israel:_*
(Rom 10:12) *_For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek;_* for the same [Lord] is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him;
(Matt 23:37) _O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, [thou] that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee,_ ...
(Matt 23:38) *_Behold, your house is left unto you desolate._*
But my understanding is that the prior promise (prior to the law) is the original promise of salvation that was and is fulfilled in Jesus Christ. He regathers the Jewish people in his mercy through Jesus Christ I don’t think he does that apart from the ekklesia, it is WITH and IN the ekklesia for all time. The gentiles have been grafted into Israel and Judah, we are adopted into them, not replacing them. Why is this offensive?
@@theeternalsbeliever1779 the promise begins with Genesis 3 and continues from there. Then the promise to Abraham then to Judah then to David. All those have been fulfilled in Christ and the covenant of the law has been abolished. There were never promises of salvation in that covenant only of going into the land (type for presence of God) if they obeyed and exile from the land (type for presence of God) if they disobeyed the law. By the prior promise I mean prior to the law not the promise in the law.
I agree with you and don’t think it’s offensive at all. It’s right there in Ephesians 2&3.
The New Covenant replaced the Old Covenant.
Correct see Hebrews 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
That Jeff pastor from Arizona should listen to this
@ 6:25 Jesus Christ 1st gave the Truth unto the Jewish people after his resurrection the Gospel was taken unto the gentiles. The Jewish people will start and even now are coming to receive Jesus Christ as their Promised Messiah. But remember: Matthew 20:16 “So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.”
@Yoel Cohen Exactly 100% agree. That was my point.
@Yoel Cohen Many do not understand God's way of time as we see in Psalms 90:4 “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.” and 2 Peter 3:8 “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
Anyone who will not hear the words of that prophet will be cut off from the people.
It's not a replacement. In Revelation 12, there is ONLY ONE woman that represents God's people before the cross and after the cross. Galatians 3:29 makes abundantly clear, it has ALWAYS ONLY been those living by faith in Christ who have ever been heir to God's promises. Just being born a Jew in the flesh, is not worth anything in God's sight. Jesus is true Israel (Matt. 2:15; Hos. 11:1). In Christ, I am a true Israelite and heir to the promises made to Abraham, and instead of just a little piece of land in the Middle East, God has promised this whole earth, made completely brand new, as my inheritance! Until that time, God is calling each of His children to go throughout the world to proclaim the gospel. He is not calling His people into a little country in the Middle East. He plans to have His glory fill the whole earth! Please also read Matt. 21:42,43; Rom. 9:4-8; Gal. 3:7; and Eph. 2:11-14.
Thank you
At 17:40 a Christian father calls in about circumcision from a rabbi. Dr. Brown's bias clouds his theology. Dr. Brown says "great" "beautiful" "wonderful" and "give thanks to God." The Apostle Paul gave very different advice in Galatians 5:2-4 "2 Look: I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you. 3 I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision that he is obligated to keep the whole law. 4 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified[a] by the law; you have fallen away from grace."
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
5:37 That would be like telling a starving person, "Oh, Jesus is the bread of life."
John 6:26, 27
26 Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled. 27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
I agree with you about replacement theology. Regarding antisemitism in the church, most of the antisemitism done in the name of Christ was done by people who also would’ve persecuted most evangelical Christians even worse.
For example, compare Luther’s support for the killing of anyone who held to believer’s baptism versus his call for oppressing Jews. How would an Anabaptist murdered with the approval of Luther be culpable for Luther’s antisemitism? Or how would a Baptist today who supports restoration theology have any connection to Luther’s antisemitism?
@user-sd8do5qf1h I'm praying for you. I'm glad you shared your struggle.
Something to keep in mind is we wouldn't want to be judged by the worst in our racial or religious groups (and neither Epstein nor Maxwell seemed to be even observant.) And, of course, most Jews would be disgusted at what they did.
Regarding antisemitism, someone said, the devil is happy as long as we're hating people. (Of course, Epstein and Maxwell should be judged for what they did, and we should care most for their victims.) The Lord Jesus said, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", and "Love your neighbor as yourself". We would want God to be kind and merciful towards us, and turn us from any wrong we are doing. We should pray and seek the same for others.
A good piece of advice I got from someone involved in fighting child abuse was to take time to keep yourself going. Spend time with God, friends, gardening, music, good things, exercise, whatever. Don't focus on it so much that it burns you out.
Maybe since there's nothing we can really do about Epstein and Maxwell (Though maybe you could support a ministry that helps the innocent who are in similar circumstances?), the best thing for you to do is put it out of your mind and focus on good to build you back up?
Don't let the devil use them to make you his victim. And remember, God is the just judge who will judge all people justly. And what we do for God, like evangelism, is powerful, and lasts forever.
Again, thanks for your comment. I'm praying for you.
@user-sd8do5qf1h Thanks for your response. I will try to address the three points you brought up.
The Mossad connection with Epstein and Maxwell: I have not researched this much, But I see why people think there may be a connection. But I would note that Robert Barnes, a conservative lawyer, who often argues for behind the scenes/conspiracies that are going on, does not see a connection.
But even if there is a connection, it's not like it's really the only country doing bad things like this. The spy business is a dirty game. Also, note how the United States treated Epstein and Maxwell for the last 15 to 20 years. It looks like the United States had some sort of connection to them. I can hate something my country does, or what another country does, without hating my country or another country.
Jewish pedophiles immigrating to Israel to escape prosecution: yes, this does happen, and it is a bad thing. One thing I appreciate about our interaction is you're pointing out and hating very, very bad things. But note, some do you get sent back and you will find Israeli newspapers online condemning the immigration policy that permits this to happen.
Yes, this is a very, very bad thing. But again, Israel's not the only country with problems like this. Look at how the “grooming gangs” were treated in England, the marriage age in some Muslim countries, abuse of boys in Afghanistan, and United States permitting an open border for decades, which permits human, including child, trafficking. These are all things we should hate, but I don't see that Israel is unique here.
Christian supporting Israel: I'm not sure what you mean here. We should pray for Israel, and pray for other countries. I think we should especially pray for Israel, because they are still God's chosen people (And then use this heightened prayer focus for Israel to heighten our prayer for others, too.). I can see an argument against the United States giving them financial aid, as Israel has a surplus, and we are in deep debt with a deficit. But I do think we should be fair in judgment, and not condemn Israel for bad things they do while turning a blind eye to others who do the same.
Whatever countries or people we do support, our first allegiance should be to God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ and His Gospel. And I go to a church with people involved in Jewish evangelism and that supports Jewish evangelism (Along with supporting evangelism to many other countries and locally, too.)
I have a cousin who thinks we are the real Isrealites, and she is unwilling to yield to biblical truth that clearly debunks that false ideology. Where and when can I see this debate?
Matthew 8:11-12
[11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
65-80 Million human beings died in WWII, many different ethnicities, races, nationalities and religions, from many countries. 25-40 Million human beings died in WWI, and Millions more before during, and after these two world wars. It is time to teach our children and all citizens of the world, that every single human life lost is equally tragic and each life is equally valuable. All genocides and holocausts and intentional famines and oppressions must be taught to all people in the future. To learn who rules over you, find out who you cannot criticize, and who gets all the attention and sympathy. Who controls the media, controls the culture, and the minds of all people. Who controls the media?
That thinking is exactly what let normal civilised German people into being tricked into murdering teachers, shop owners, bakers, musicians, dancers, WWI vets, mothers, fathers, children, babies. The lie that somehow these Jews were in control and were running the world and causing all the problems.
These people were not even their enemies and died for their country just 20 years earlier.
They were murdered because of who they descended from.
Zzz
@@christianmichael8quit spewing your bias! He's RIGHT. Dr. Brown is WRONG.
Respectfully, you sound like an anti semitic conspiracy theorist and not like a Christian.
Now its obvious it Is NOT who you think!
Acts 21:20-21 is a watershed regarding the Abrahamic covenant and circumcision. I’m not sure if Paul actually told the Jews to not circumcise their children. However, I am sure that he told them that if they did it would have no effect on their child’s relationship to God, it would profit them nothing. Their boys would not become one of God’s people because they were circumcised according to the requirements of the Abrahamic Covenant! This infuriated the Jews who trusted in circumcision. The fact that the New Testament abolishes circumcision in the flesh for ethnic Jews and Gentile proselytes makes it clear that we cannot treat ethnic Jews today as if the Abrahamic covenant has continued unaltered in regard to them. An ethnic Jew today cannot rightfully claim to be one of “God’s people” based upon the Abrahamic covenant and neither should we be telling them that they hold this status before God. If the Abrahamic covenant is now fulfilled in the New covenant with Israel, and it is, then the “My people” status for Jews and Gentiles flows only from the New covenant. To be outside of the New covenant, whether Jew or Gentile, leaves one as “not My people”. Dispensationalists have failed to understand that it is covenantal membership that conveys the special status of being “My people”, not ethnicity or physical descent (this has always been the case in both Old or New covenant eras!).
This is a point where GRLA Hebrew would agree with Dr. Brown with the exception of 1. Who the Jews are and 2. The prophetic fulfillment of 1948
Covenant is so denigrated by Nico (clergy) and Laitins (laity, common folk in the assembly of the Nicos) alike - In Genesis 15:17, we see that YHWH is making Covenant with Abraham - the smoking furnace and a burning Lamp passes between the pieces! HalleluYAHSHUA - He Is Eternal
There's no replacement theology. The church doesn't replace Israel: it is the continuation of Israel. That's what the scripture indicates. The modern nation of physical Israel is like any other pagan nation that doesn't know Christ and needs to hear the gospel.
WORD!
Exactly!!
That makes no sense. The land was promised to the Jewish people. Non Jews. Us. Get the blessing of salvation and eternal life. But the land is theirs. And will be theirs. It’s not all or nothing.
@@thomasmarchese2808The point of having the land was to build what? To squat there and have gay sex in clubs in Tel Aviv? That’s what God and Jesus promised? That was the point? This one ethnic tribe gets to squat on this dirt for all time and sodomize each other? Get a grip you fool.
The point of the covenant was to inhabit the land and build a Temple so God would be present with his people, it was to restore what was lost in Eden. But Israel failed to follow the covenant as they having been doing continuously since the time of Christ and that’s why they are cursed and don’t have a temple or priesthood.
@@thomasmarchese2808 the new testament explains that the Israelites passing through the Red Sea is our baptism; the wine and oil in the Old Testament are the Holy Spirit poured out; the temple is both Jesus' physical body and the collective of believers; circumcision is separation of oneself from the acts of sin; and the Sabbath is resting in Christ and putting aside one's evil works; the Old Testament sacrifices are symbols of Jesus slain; and the true Jew or Israelite is the one who by faith applies the blood of lamb to his life. Why then do you think the physical land of Israel is of any import to Christians beyond any other nation? If the physical land in the Middle East more important than the earth of which we are made, where God has put his fingerprint and into which he breathes his Spirit? I dare saying, there is no land more holy than the land that Jesus took in his hands to fashion a human, be that person "Palestinian" or Hebrew. No, my friend, you are being taken captive by heresy: you are reading the New Testament through the lens of the Old and not the Old through the land of the New.
I don't know how it works for you. But have you tried to get a station in Lakewood NJ? There is a HUGE Jewish Population! No Exaggeration on HUGE.
The United States pays for 20% of Israel's military budget while Israel has a space program, universal health care, and still runs a budget surplus for six of the last ten years....
I'm @ 5:31 into this video and will watch the rest. My question here @5.31 We we are reborn in Christ we become children of the Kingdom of Heaven. As I read in Revelation 21:2 “And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” Then we read in Revelation 21:22 “And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.” As for me Jesus Christ is my Holy Place for he is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Amen.
“Prepared as a bride” is simply descriptive of how a bride is adorned. I’m not sure the anaology is that the city replaces the temple or that the city is the bride.
I’m also not sure the city and the temple are ever regarded as being synonymous. There was Jerusalem but within Jerusalem there was a temple.
Are you suggesting the definitions of bride has change to a city? Or that Jesus (Yeshua) is adorned for God? That would be an interesting take on the Trinity.
We understand that the eklessia is the bride (the body of believers) but is the city now the bride?
If so, Are you saying that God adorned the city (the new bride) for Himself? Cause I’m pretty sure we’ve been taught that God is spoken of as the husband in the Old and New Testament.
You’re definitely not saying that the saints in heaven are part of the bride and are coming down in the vision because you’ve already stated that Jesus is your literal city and kingdom. Please elaborate. Thanks.
@@essenceofgrowing7804 What we clearly see from scripture is the fact that Jesus Christ is the Temple of God not made by the hands of man. Jesus is the Word of God that was made Flesh by the power of the Holy Spirit. The Father and Holy Spirit both indwelled with in Jesus Christ as his walked on this earth with his chosen apostles as we read in John 14: 5 - 11 5: Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?
6: Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
7: If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
8: Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
9: Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
10: Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
11: Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.
@@JohnReon
Not sure that you actually addressed my question with regards to how you symbolically make Yeshua the future third temple (that we see in scripture will again be defiled), or how you see Yeshua as the city (the new Jerusalem with all its promised dimensions), or how you see Yeshua returning to be the bride of YHVH (as if YHVH dwelled here below but Yeshua dwelled above).
I mentioned that the way you’re seeing this is an interesting take on the trinity. I guess we could try to sort out what (in scripture) is supposed to be seen as literal and what is supposed to be seen as merely symbolic and less literal. Lots of books have already been written on biblical symbolism and hyper literalism. I don’t think we should do that. We’d be here for weeks and it probably wouldn’t be fruitful.
So maybe it really is a discussion on the trinity we should to have. That too can also be very daunting. Anyway…
I believe in the trinity but, you know as well as I do, or at least you should that, people don’t always mean the same thing when they use the word Trinity.
Some don’t like to admit it but they actually see polytheism with three distinct physically separated gods walking around and working together in unity in heaven. You figure this out when you start asking them specific question about the trinity. They don’t actually see God (a being) becoming flesh. They see it as only one of the three, namely Jesus (iesus or Yeshua), becoming a man. This is the same reason why some don’t see that Yeshua was the Word of God (scriptures) made flesh. This has something to do with their inability to recognize Gods omnipresence. For example: His manifest presence in the temple (in the Holy of Holies) but yet still lives outside of His creation.
Christian polytheism doesn’t really thing YHVH and YESHUA (Jesus) are the same being. Christian polytheism thinks and teaches that if you went to heaven that you’d see three different distinct physical gods.
Then in order to claim that they are true trinitarian they argue that these gods will spiritually operate as one entity (like a husband and wife are two distinct people but in a spiritual sense that are regarded as one).
And then others see God as a class of being, and angels as another class, humans another and animals another, insects in another classification of being, etc. I’m consider myself Trinitarian. When I hear “God is one” (echad) I don’t think this intends to communicate to us that there is a polytheism going on in the heavens within the classification of being, God.
With that said, let me get back on subject: Are you saying that the temple that was in the heavens, the details of which Moses received, that which the earthly temple was a copy of, that this was altogether a temple, a city and also Yeshua all along?
If Yeshua is the Word made flesh only symbolically but we have a Christian polytheism of the godhead…. How can some square that idea that YHVH is adorning Yeshua for Himself? I’m pretty sure that is not classical Trinity. Are then really saying that you actually believe the earthly temple, the details that Moses received, was Yeshua and not actually a copy of heavenly literal temple? I think the Torah (the first five books) teaches that the earthly temple, though tangible, is merely a copy of the literal in heaven, right? Or maybe you you’re saying Solomon took the dimensions hyper literal and built something that he should have not was not to be taken literal.
The ekkelsia in the first few centuries brought in some very interesting gentile characters. Some of which were secular and some pagan, and some that were Gnostic. The gnostics cause some serious problems. They would attempt to allegorize everything in a dualistic platonic manner cause they saw physical reality is corrupt.
They would eventually go on to allegorize the Shabbat just so that wouldn’t (and couldn’t) physically rest on Shabbat, or to prevent themselves from looking Jewish, or because allegorizing scripture seemed to be a pious thing to do. There was also syncretism at play which the gentiles were already very familiar with doing. There was also a misunderstanding what Paul wrote and also a lack of understanding of the prophetic- symbolic and literal language- found in the Tanakh.
I think we need to remember that the temple destruction was predicted long before Yeshua came and was destroyed out of judgment (just like the first temple was).
Prophecy in the Tanak speaks of a messiah that would be zealous for the temple. Yeshua was angry of the corruption taking place in the temple for a very good reason. The house of prayer- The house of YHVH- was being used in a corrupt manner.
Cities and temple are not equivalent. Scripture never speaks of them as being the same. Is also don’t see that YHVH (the father) is the Husband of Yeshua (with being the son and bride).
Man is class of being. Those of us of faith, both the natural branches and those grated in, make up the body. The body needs to be dressed in white (purity) LIKE a bride. LIKE! Descriptive. Just like the word AS. The Greek word for “like” and “as” is the same.
This reminds me of a few discussions I’ve had with some BHI. The Black Hebrew Israelites are a groups of American black people who think they are the real Jews and that the Jewish people in Israel are fake. I won’t get into all their nonsense right now. You can look them up but they will argue that Yeshua was black. In the book of revelations that see Yeshua with white curly hair like the white curly hair of a sheep. We know this doesn’t mean Yeshua will have sheep hair. Sheep hair is curly and it is white. It’s descriptive. They’ll say this verse described Yeshua as having curly hair like a black person that is old. Interesting thing is that some sheep have straight hair. Not all sheep have white hair.
So I guess I’m trying to point out that this city being adorned as a wife is NOT saying the city is a wife. The people in the city is what is always spoken of as the bride. The word “as” is merely descriptive. The class of beings, the human kind, the class in which Yeshua became like man to redeem, which is the class below the class of angels, those of faith, this is the class of beings spoken of as a bride. Understanding this doesn’t diminish the work of Yeshua. It certainly doesn’t diminish His beauty. And it think hermeneutically it’s much more consistent.
What are your thoughts?
@@essenceofgrowing7804 Many of your questions can be answered if you read: Acts 17:24-32 as it is written. 24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.
32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.
Also read all of Isaiah Chapter 55
Then read Psalms Chapter 77
And for the fullness of understanding of what you have read. Matthew Chapter 7 Verse 7
That’s a nice shirt! Wear it as often as you like!
It seems to me you're mixing your messages of predestination and election. You don't believe in there being elect Gentiles by God's effectual grace (Church), but you believe in God's effectual grace for physical Israel.
Am I misunderstood in your position?
@Yoel Cohen Matt 19:28-30 says whose going to sit and judge the 12 tribes of Israel. Hebrews 8:13 says
"In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away."
The old covenant died with Christ on the Cross, and finalized in the destruction of the physical temple in 70 A.D.
Israel is and has always been the elect from Israel and Gentiles. All of the elect in Christ, both Israel and Gentiles, were guaranteed forgiveness of their sins from Adam to today. Israel is Christ.
That's my position.
@Yoel Cohen Also, regarding the 144k. These were taken from men before they defiled themselves with women. They're NOT on earth, they're n heaven.
Revelation 14:4 KJVS
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
@Yoel Cohen My confusion from Dr. Brown is that he discounts the texts that show there's both Jews and Gentiles, individuals, that are elected for receiving the atonement, but then states that the LORD is going to arbitrarily "save" physical Israel.
You see my confusion in this being a mixed message?
@Yoel Cohen I appreciate all the texts. ALL was fulfilled in the law when Christ rose from the grave. Christ "is the end of the law" to everyone who believes.
Romans 3:30 implies a dual predestination of election. The Jews through the faith OF Christ and Gentiles by faith OF Christ in the present.
My take anyways
@Yoel Cohen ALL those born again by the will and grace of God alone through the faith, works, shed blood, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ alone are Israel. Jews and Gentiles.
I hope the Sons of the Kingdom enjoy wheeping and gnashing their teeth I guess? Why anyone would want to be thrown into the outer darkness is beyond me.
Matthew 8:11-12
[11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Paul said some Jews were cut/broken off the tree because of unbelief. Unbelief in Jesus?
Yes that is correct, this would also include most people calling themselves Jews today.
Joh 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
If there is only one fold, what is that fold called? Israel won't be saved until they come to Jesus. And when they come to Jesus they are the church. So yes, the only Israel is the church. Church is the collective of all who are called to follow Jesus. We are all one in Christ Jesus.
Mt 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Joh 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
Mt 24:23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
25 Behold, I have told you before.
26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
That physical "nation of Israel" is all about antichrist, because that is the kind of messiah they are looking for. The true Israel will be fulfilled when Jesus returns.
The messianic kingdom was never about this flesh. It was always spirit. And you were never going to live forever anyway, unless you come through Jesus, who is the only way, truth and eternal life. Everyone who believes that Jesus is the messiah is Israel. No one who doesn't believe that Jesus is the messiah is Israel. Therefore, when the last person who will come to belief in Jesus, comes to belief in Jesus, then all Israel will be saved.
When Jesus said, "Ye must be born again, or you cannot see the kingdom of God", he was explaining the resurrection. We had to be born to come into this physical world. We will have to be "born again" in the resurrection to come into the kingdom of God.
Joh 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water (physical birth, born) and of the Spirit (resurrected, born again), he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh IS flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit IS spirit.
We are still flesh (dust), we are not yet spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
9 Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be?
We are not yet like the wind.
1Co 15:53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
1Co 15:54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
Eze 37:11 Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.
12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.
13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,
14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.
"Replacement theology" is one of those disparaging distinctions thrown around to dismiss an idea without debate, like "anti-semite" and "conspiracy theorist." The church is Israel, and is the fulfillment of the promises God made to Adam and Noah and Abraham and Israel and Moses. Not a replacement at all, but a fulfillment and inclusion. The final fulfillment is to be accomplished in the millennial kingdom. His kingdom is not of this world. Any "apparent" fulfillment in this present world is an antichrist counterfeit.
The messianic prophecies were always meant to be fulfilled in the first resurrection and in the millennial kingdom. A remnant is a very small leftover from a much larger whole. All Israel will only be saved in a remnant. The Jewish misunderstanding that the messianic kingdom would be fulfilled in this present time and among the physical nation of Israel was always wrong. Which is why they rejected Him the first time.
Joh 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
(KJV)
Ro 11:4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal.
5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.
All we believers, Jews and Greeks, will be revived and rule with Christ on the third day. (Ho 6:1-3) There is no "church age". That is not found in the Bible.
Ga 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. This idea people have of separating gentile believers from Jewish believers is unbiblical. Unbelieving Jews won't be saved anyway. Neither will unbelieving gentiles. The moment you believe you are no longer gentile. There is no gentile church. There is only an Israel church with whom gentiles have been blessed to conjunct.
Joh 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
Mt 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. John the baptizer
Ga 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but AS OF ONE, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Ga 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, TILL THE SEED SHOULD COME to whom the promise was made;
Lu 3:9 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit (belief in Jesus) is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
Mt 8:11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Ro 9:26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God. 27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved: 28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth. 29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha.
The complete fulfillment will be in the first resurrection.
Eze 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,
14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.
Ro 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Ro 9:6 ¶ Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Ro 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved:
Most people think that gentile means any people who aren't Jews. But gentile means heathen, and heathen are people who don't know the true God. Even the people we call Jews, those who reject Jesus, are heathen or gentile. So even the unbelieving Jews are gentiles treading down the holy city. The scripture could be translated this way:
Lu 21:24...: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the unbelievers, until the times of the unbelievers be fulfilled.
Just as God changed Jacob's name to Israel, He changes our name to Israel when we believe in Jesus. Everyone who believes in Jesus is Israel. No one else is. Therefore, "all Israel shall be saved."
Strong's Concordance
03478. Israel, Yisra'el, yis-raw-ale' : he will rule as God.
Re 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
Ga 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek (gentile), there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
There are not two different churches and there are not two different Israels. We are all one in Christ Jesus.
Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
The only way replacement theology makes sense, would be if you threw out the Bible and wrote your own. When Jesus spoke he was speaking to Jews, and in Revelation many of the end times prophecies the Jews play a major role in, this is not even ambiguous.
Matthew 8:10-12
[10] When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, “Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such faith. [11] I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, [12] while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
"Replacement theology" as a synonym for supersessionism is an unjustifiably stupid and inaccurate terminology. Disagreement is fine, but there's no replacement going on in supersessionism- it involves grafting of gentiles into promises that faithful Jews are heirs of. No one gets replaced. Even if supersessionism is wrong, that doesn't mean it postulates a replacement.
ERROR!
Israel and the church are NOT separate!
The replacement theology accusation presupposes that the church is a gentile entity and it is NOT! Peter James and John and the other disciples did not stop being ISRAEL to become THE CHURCH-- They were in fact TRUE ISRAEL with their Jewish Jeremiah 31 New covenant NOW INCLUDING ALL GENTILES that believe in Christ by faith.
In Christ's body on the cross he made the two ONE. Christ has made the twain (Jew and gentile) ONE NEW MAN and they share EQUAL inheritance and our co-heirs with Christ according to the scriptures.
This teaching proclaims that Israel and the church are separate when Christ Jesus died making ONE NEW MAN and that is by faith alone.
There are NO exclusionary promises OUTSIDE OF Christ and HE IS The HEAD of the Church with the ONLY Preeminence! The KINGDOM and the earth and it's fullness ESPECIALLY ISRAEL-- belong to the LORD
Scriptures for this can be found in Galatians 3 Ephesians 2-3 Colossians 1-2 Romans 9 through 11
New Covenant Whole Gospel:
Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him.
He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth.
Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by
husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
Why did Peter address the crowd on the Day of Pentecost as "men of Judea", and as "men of Israel", and as "all the house of Israel", when about 3,000 Israelites accepted the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary? There were no Gentiles in the Church until several years later.
Why did Paul still consider himself an Israelite, even after his conversion, in Romans 11:1? Who are the faithful "remnant" of Israel in Romans 11:5 during Paul's time?
Watch the UA-cam videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
First, I do not hold replacement theology. I have brought the gospel to Jewish people you know personally. The New Covenant has been gentilized to mean saved and going to heaven. Yet Jesus spoke of eternal life in him something the law and the prophets did not proclaim or give by the law. The New Covenant is Christ in you the HOPE of glory (heaven). So it seems that you maintain the covenant of Moses is still in effect today. That is not what Paul taught to us gentiles. The New Covenant invests in our persons the indwelling Father Son and Holy Spirit. John 14:23. It seems you miss Ezekiel 36:25-27, Jeremiah 31:31 etc. The New Covenant reveals the eternal life via indwelling of Christ. You have mixed the gentilization of the New Covenant with the Judizer view of the completed law. Neither is correct. I am staggered that the word is not clear to you. Having begun in the spirit are we now made perfect in the flesh (law). Jesus incorporated the blessing to the Israelites of YHWH dwelling in their midst with the personal regeneration and indwelling of the Holy Spirit via the redemption blood of the Christ. See, Deuteronomy 23:14, Leviticus 26:12, Isaiah 63:11, Numbers 35:33 etc. You should know this!
Earthly Israel must come into line with Heavenly Israel, God's will be done on earth as heaven. Is that bad to say? Any people that are racist against Israel or think Jesus will not fight for the remnant that will believe in Him are wrong.
The Jews as a group are defined by rejection of Christ. The state of Israel does not consider ethnically Jewish people who convert to Christianity to be Jews for purposes of Israeli citizenship. Israel is a Satanic Jewish Supremacist terrorist state that Jesus will destroy if he were to return now.
If someone who is not a Jew calls him/herself a Jew, isn't that replacement theology. Similarly, if some people are learning and speaking Hebrew, aren't they practising replacement theology?
Help me answer thses 2 questions. Warning: If spammers who pretend to be @AskDrBrown sends answer, I will delete this comment.
Replacement theology is only a term they made up against people who believe that The Church and Israel have no distinction. that True Israel is Christ always.
This argument is only a part of a bigger argument between Dispensationalism and some form of Covenant Theology
Jer 31 new covenant is is quoted by the author of hebrews, and applies to believers jew or gentile. Stop twisting scripture
Have you ever lied, stolen, used God's name in vain, looked wuth lust? if so you need to repent today and Believe in Jesus Christ to save you from Hell and go to heaven instead
Jesus said my sheep hear my voice. He was regathering the lost sheep 2000yrs ago. He also separated the obedient sheep from the stubborn goats.
God said only a remnant. Not all Israel is of Israel. Jesus did regather the lost sheep in his mercy. Paul was correct, its not the sons of the flesh, but of the promise that were to be saved. Every single title relating to ancient Israel is given to the church, including gentile Christigiven to another nationans. 1 Peter 2:11 say they are a holy nation. What is the problem God made a choice. The Zionist theft of Palestine is not of God. Its just not a miracle. How else could God say the kingdom will be removed from you and given to another nation producing fruit thereof. Thank God he replaced them as the Zionist project has brought war and unhappiness to all. Many young Jews are reversing their Aliah in disgust. God is no respector of persons means no special favour for Jews.
Hey, I would say that when Scripture says that God shows no favoritism that it is specifically referring to salvation alone. Through Israel salvation will come to world, and that came and comes through Jesus Christ. Even in heaven, God will show some sort of favoritism towards those who had better works; after all, why else should we ever live to store up treasures in heaven? (that is not to say either that anyone who believes and repents is not saved nor that our primary goal as Christians is to store up treasures in heaven). Looking at the end-time prophecies of the in OT (and in Revelation), Israel plays one of the key roles, meaning that the people of Israel will exist as the people of Israel, not solely the Church.
This here is more of a personal note: I don't think every title of Israel is given to the Church. Israel is of course the name of Jacob given by God which the Israelites adopted. We are descendants of Abraham by faith, not descendants of Jacob (Israel). For that promise was made to Abraham, not Jacob. That may just be nit-picking though, I'm not quite sure.
There are good Jews in Israel who are grateful to their God for the rebirth of their nation. Not all of them are the Zionists of which you spoke. All groups of people will have bad people, especially among those who vie for power. Still, does not God make good things come from the bad?
I could be wrong about all this, and I am open to correction. Thanks, and God bless you
There are no Jews who prove their lineage. They lack a genealogy back to Jacob. Ezra used geneologies to seperate the Jews of his day from the alien wives. Prove there is a Jew who can enter his geneology in the temple made by human hands and you will establish the fact.@@harrylong575
Why do you not first focus on the Word who is God who created the Heavens and the Earth who became flesh and dwelt among us, the Only Begotten Son who is in the Bosom of the Father, before the concept of Jews and Gentiles were created , and to as many as received Him to them He gave His power to become the Sons of God.
And an old Creation that was totally destroyed except Just Noah who walked with God and totally complied with every command of God, and God made two covenants with, before there were two groups Jews and Gentiles, to prepare you for two groups Jews and Gentiles, or two be more precise , one great nation and the other nations of the world, that are both blessed in Abram in Genesis chapter 12, and this prepares us for the foreordained future of both, centralised in the Son of Abraham and Sarah born from Sarah's dead womb in Romans chapter 4, that Paul says is the meaning of the promise in Genesis chapter 15v6, your seed will be as many as the stars in their multitudes, , but the first promise is the Great Nation of Israel and the Second Promise is all the nations of the world.
Both promises are are given to Abraham, they are not in competition to see who wins the ultimate prize of God's predestined purpose, but in there historical sequence Israel is First, and it is their rebellion against the revelation of God in His sent Son , that sets them aside until the second promise to Abraham is fulfilled , when all the nations are blessed in seed of Abraham, but their is a vital missing link in this elementary explanation, and is found in the fact that the Father of all of us fail to see, is that the Man who was promised the promise land never possessed it, He died, but when we come to the letter to the Hebrews chapter 11v8-13, and this was true of Isaac and Jacob, these all died in faith without possessing the promise of God, because their inheritance was in Heaven, the New Jerusalem that belongs to the New Creation
GayRabbi!? Wth!? You’re boasting about this!? 15:00
Dr. Brown, exactly who is considered a Jew nowadays? 1% ethnicity? 50%, 90%? Only those living in Israel? Orthodox/Practicing? Which other groups? Etc.???
No one can answer this from Scripture as to who exactly is the one that all the Scriptures would apply to these days. With the temple destroyed in 70 or 90 AD, how are there actual Jews in the religious, Biblical sense?
Very confusing teachings everywhere!
Do you have a video explaining this better? Thank you.
Jew is just a religious identity not an ethnicity. The religion just has an ethnic component to it because it places infusis on lineage, but that ethnic component only exists because of the religion.
As for a Jew without the temple they had no temple in Babylon, and the religion continued to be observed. According to Hosea 14:2 tells us that without a temple prayer fills the void of temple sacrifices.
The part of who is considered a Jew nowadays is a bit complicated, because there are different sects of Judaism that do things differently. In most recent history it was anyone who is born to a Jewish mother or converts, but that changed in the last hundred years when the Reform movement changed it to anyone with one Jewish parent who was raised Jewish. The Orthodox didn't agree with that though and stuck to matrilineal descent, even in biblical times it's not really too cut and dry who is a Jew.
According to Maimonodes in the Mishna Torah 30:15 he writes that a Jew who rejects the Sabbath is like a goy, yes you heard it a Jew who rejects the Sabbath is a goy. This shows there is no definite way to define a Jew since the meaning clearly has always been ever changing based on circumstances, and social settings of the time periods that Jews have existed.
Disclaimer: The word Jew does not mean the tribe of Judah, the first time it is used is in Esther 2:5 referring to Mordecai who is from the tribe of Benjamin.
The promises made to Israel (the chosen people, not the nation/land) WERE rescinded by none other than Jesus in Matthew 21:43 where he said "THE KINGDOM OF GOD SHALL BE TAKEN FROM YOU AND GIVEN TO A NATION BRINGING FORTH THE FRUITS THEREOF." This was said after he cursed the fig tree which bore no fruit. Read the parable of the wicked husbandmen in Matthew 21:33-45 to understand the context and full impact of what Jesus was conveying. Are modern-day Jews in Israel "producing fruit" when they've been systematically killing, destroying and driving out Christians from Palestine and the middle east? Very few Christians who have lived among Muslims for centuries remain today. Dr Brown is a Zionist apologist and therefore cannot be trusted with his man-made dispensationalist theology.
“Beyond belief bogus”. Lol yea. Keep that smug attitude and underestimate your opponent .
this is funny....people asking questions, getting answers and arguing against it, as if they already knew what they were going to say before they got their answer...hu?
its funny seeing it. and not so funny at the same time..
why ask a question, then get the answer then you dont like the answer so you say no!!!
loaded questions suck....