This Should Scare You
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 тра 2024
- FACT CHECK SHEET ►bit.ly/MogulMailCorrections
follow me on twitter ► / ludwigahgren
follow me on tiktok ► / ludwigahgren
follow me on instagram ► / ludwigahgren
join my subreddit ► / ludwigahgren
LINK TO EVERYTHING ► wlo.link/@ludwig
This Video Took 12 Takes
#mogulmail #ludwig
I hope popular streamer Ludwig doesn't use ai to impersonate good youtubers like mogul mail
Just sounds like they need to collab.
Have you ever seen both of them in the same room at the same time?
Makes you think...
I think maga mail is the original
Ludwig has been copying Mogulmail for years already yet no one calls him out
@@hnorth5205
Now that you mentioned it, he even has the same hairstyle as Mogul!
Bruh, this Ludwig guy has no shame.
That intro segment that was played definitely did scare me…that was NOT a mogul move
Huge blunder
@@kaboomer polar opposite of "outstanding move"
I dont understand, why was spongebob moaning is own name? Shouslnt it have been someone else's name or a differenr voice?
@@tabithal2977its like if they had a cool episode where spongebob was turned into a pokemon but its also at the same time a sex-ed episode
@@nutcruncherI read these comments before actually watching the video and I've pretty much never been as confused as this shit made me before lmao
The fact that they asked her again so close to the release makes me think they already trained it on her voice and had the soundalike voice actress as a backup
That is totally bizarre to think about, like they would have to either delay the product release OR just magically reveal her perfectly trained voice less than a day after.
vince staples, dope as hell
Nah, I'm sure they can change the voice on the fly, just like that. They could definitely add an option to upload your own voice, but they won't for obvious reasons.
@@Revadike I'm guessing you'd need a lot of voice samples to make it sound as good as it does right now, so it's not something you'd do during an afternoon. The easiest way would be if you had hours upon hours of footage of someone speaking in a lot for different emotional ranges, but to get that the person who's voice you're copying is going to have to be a prolific actress or something...
@@LoveOlsson98 It used to be the case years ago
But now you can have a few minutes of footage and it'll clone very accurately.
Tech bros and not understanding consent.
Name a more iconic duo
Tech bros and wanting a robot gf
6:58 tech bro , ceo not snitching on himself😂😂
Minecraft youtuber at peak 1 million subscriber and miner
consent to what? is another person KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK what the fuck are you talking about?
Sick elitists and trying to ban people because they sound like you?
1:08 huge opportunity missed to say "and I'm not talking about spongebob"
😂
HUGE miss Lwig
That's pretty damning to reach out for permission two days before.
Eh is it? They asked her months ago, maybe they were checking if she changed her mind before they release it. If they used someone who just sounds like Scarlett and not actual voice clips of her - I don't see any issue.
New updates say OpenAI casted the original voice actor before talking to Scarlett.
@@user-er1fs3je4x right like unless they used specific exact lines from the movie or something i don't see how they could possible prove infringement. Like does Scar Jo have copyright protection over just a slightly deep voiced woman being... nice or witty? It may be creepy and whatever but i can't possibly see how this is infringement unless there's other stuff we don't know about. You can't own the rights to a female voice that behaves kinda like a character you once played in the most vague way possible.
Is it? I think they didn't even have to offer, it was a courtesy to first offer the original actress that played the character that inspired them. She said no, so they hired someone else with a similar voice. Not to impersonate Scarlet Johansson, to reference the iconic AI character from Her by getting a voice that is reminiscent of it. Because, you know, their product has a lot of parallels with the movie. ScarJo doesn't own the copyright to Her, or the copyright to the voice of the other voice actress who happens to sound similar to her, I don't see how she has any case or legitimate grievance here. Is that other actress just not supposed to work because she sounds too similar to someone more famous?
@@adidab14What a bunch of rules lawyer D&D player nonsense. If it's a character she played and it's using a voice obviously intended to sound exactly like her, it's infringement. Intent matters more than you think.
The fact that they want to replicate Her as much as possible just shows that they completely missed the point of the whole movie.
What was the point? If you’re claiming it’s a dystopia, the director, Spike Jonze, don’t want it to be labeled as Dystopian. It’s a very nuance movie.
Go on.. explain the point of her
here's a reminder that movie directors are not psychics that can predict the future. They make a story that sounds interesting and people will enjoy watching. Something ending badly in a movie brings you exactly zero information about how that thing will end up in real life.
@@master1442p thanks, I haven't watched it, I just hate when people try to make a point about something being bad by comparing to a movie plot. Same for 'this is a black mirror episode omg'. It's just entertainment
@@user-er1fs3je4x people keep mentioning her and the ending as a reason not to go along with ai so I watched it expecting a brutal ending only for me to be more pro AI by the end 😂
There's 0 chance they didn't choose someone who sounds like Scarlett on purpose. Instant recognition with people who haven't even seen the movie and just general appeal for something like that would be more than enough reason to do so. I'd say I'm not into all of that but if they make the Ana De Armas AI from Blade Runner 2049 I'm cooked
Honestly if they can just make it GLaDOS it's all over for me.
@@the_Royal_Crowpretty sure Glados isn’t a problem I have seen a few voice bots who pretty much nailed her voice probably because it’s kinda robotic from the start
@@the_Royal_Crow smash
You can literally generate anyone's voice using metavoice
@@philritter9042 Sure but can they nail her snark? That's what it's all about.
I think Scarlett Johansen will be one of the first cases to outline the rules of AI if she does bring OpenAI to court.
It's a voice. It will always sound like someone. It's just a retar ded opinion that people think this is wrong.
@@JohnMarston-sf1vkAlright kid, you sound like a liberal
@@ls200076huh what
@@ls200076 Bad argument
@@ls200076bro what? He's not the one being a snowflake here...
I don’t know if LLMs will be what breaks the camels back but if there’s one thing the last 5 years has taught me is that proactive legislation will always be too slow and accelerationists will act in self interest at the expense of us all.
Scraping big data has been around for quite a while and has already been challenged legally. See google books for instance. Legislation also already exists for decision support systems and are being further expanded, e.g EU AI act. There's a reason why the media pretends stricter IP infringement laws will fix worker exploitation. Hint: when you upload content to UA-cam you grant an irrevocable licence for Google to use it for anything
Lol if anything using this data for LLMs is the most useful thing you can do with it, as opposed to feeding the ad and social media algorithms
@@incriptionjust because one rich asshole is profiting off my data doesn’t mean I’m also fine with another different rich asshole also profiting off my data
what if that self interest is the wellbeing of the majority?
@@mahuk.There are some people that are going out for the progression of mankind, for sure. Those guys don't sit in many board meetings. Unfortunately the drive to be at the head of a powerful company and the drive to make the world better altruistically do not easily coexist in one person.
I just want to see our old ass judicial system try to catch up to AI chatbots and voicebots.
Tbh, they won't catch up to that... They will just look at the internal memos and make OpenAI pay ScaJo for trying to use Her-like AI voicelines.
Our judicial systems too busy trying to take the freedom of religion out of our amendments to do anything of the sort. Plus everyone in the gov is far too old to comprehend that they need to do something
Bro they are still trying to legislate tiktok, they are at least 7 years behind
'her-like' lol, celebrities don't magically gain rights over everyone who sounds like them. Imagine if you sounded like some random celebrity and because of that, you could never use your voice for anything because they are already famous and have a similar voice. As long as OpenAI is not claiming that Scarlett voiced the thing and as long as they didn't train it on her voice, they are perfectly clear in my eyes
@@user-er1fs3je4x so what you're saying is that laws should be created that force transparency in the data these things are created on.
Because you don't want to pay ScaJo unnecessarily, but you shouldn't be able to steal people's voices either.
@@JustSomeoneRandom1324 im all for transparency laws for ai training sets. What I'm saying is that many people sound "alike" in the world and some of them are celebrities.
Do you think that everyone who sounds vaguely similar to a celeb should just never talk in a microphone and should not be allowed to be a voice actor for anything? They haven't mentioned Scarlett in any of the promo materials so they are not using her likeness. If her voice is not in the training data, there is no issue.
In the movie Her, they show the importance of real human connection in the end, and how AI is not the answer. Looks like Sam Altman didn't understand or care about the point of the movie.
Did the people in the movie buy AI stuff? I think he understood the part he wanted to understand as a businessman.
@@badaboum2 In the movie EVERYONE has an AI assistant, and the whole movie is pretty much Joaquin Phoenix struggling with loneliness and trying to find connection, in the end it turns out like half the world is in a relationship with their AI.
@@RobotnikPlngas I understand that, that was a rhetorical question to show that businesses don't care about "the point" if they can make money.
@@badaboum2 Right, leave it to the corporate buddy bros to mess up a whole narrative and just tunnel vision into lead magnet or traction or whatever these guys masturbate to.
@@badaboum2 Right, I guess the marketing bros are too busy touching themselves to market traction or lead generation or whatever it is they get off to instead of looking at the whole picture.
My issue is that they've continued not addressing the hallucination issue. Generative models have no way to fact-check the information they spew out, even using their own training data, and that's reflected in the fact they continuously get things wrong. And it isn't like a human getting something wrong, where a correction results in a change, with generative models you just have to keep generating until it isn't wrong. More powerful models are better at hiding the issue, but there is still no process to eliminate the model just making shit up. Yeah, someone's gonna try to fuck the robot, they already are with inferior versions, but the underlying issue with the "groundbreaking" stuff is that occasionally it's gonna tell a kid that the hypotenuse is actually the shortest side of the triangle or translate a conversation about the weather into one about how nice this clear blue sheep herder is.
The issue also gets markedly worse the more complex and niche the topic. Sure, weird translation is fine for pleasantries, but deeper conversation? You want to accidentally tell someone from the congo about the virtues of colonialism?
Anyways its funny that open ai has fully committed to the identity of "Good news! We invented the torture matrix from famous science fiction novel: Please Don't Invent the Torture Matrix!"
It's hard to talk about this being a layman who doesn't have tech bro cred (I wonder how many engineers/comp sci/data scientists even fully understand how the latest versions of AI work) without being dismissed, but it just seems intuitively true from reading about it and using the damn thing that it's just a regurgitation machine that incests data into a useless blob that only passes the smell test for big headed programmers who think they understand how every other discipline works better than other professionals and proceed to release and sell these tools to even more conceited executives who are already using it to pump out articles, content, marketing copy, designs, internal comms, literature and even educational texts without realizing they are just funding very early and misguided research by actively worsening their products and structure until it becomes impossible to ignore.
Try to get an AI to write a run on sentence like that.
It's a marketing scheme. Always has been. Use, some of the technology is new and interesting, but at the end of the day it's all marketing.
The fact everyone calls it Artificial Intelligence like we've seen the birth of AM just goes to show how impressionable the public is. Terminology like this matters a lot. People will widely adopt it regardless of its extremely obvious flaws, because 'uhm, like. . . I've got my AI like in the movies man.' Can't wait to see the regular human being becoming even more inane and incompetent, because why learn anything or interact with others when you have your shitty yesman algorithm to tell you you're a big boy.
good analysis!
@@VinchVideosagreed. as a translator/interpreter it is goddamn impossible trying to explain to people why chatgpt can't do my job. its like they think i spent 5 years at university just reading a dictionary instead of actually learning a professional skill that cant just be replicated by guesswork
The fact they asked again 2 days before is insane.
You *know* Altman has a TTS model with ScarJo's actual voice done up and ready to go at a moment's notice. In fact, I bet his admin-level version of GTP-4o speaks to him in her voice.
maybe it’s just me, but it’s kind of horrifying seeing that AI teacher. There’s going to be so many awful repercussions just because of that.
Like what repercussions?
@@zhen7020 interpersonal connections are necessary for proper brain development in children. AI cannot replace a proper human teacher, especially not a good one.
@@cooltwittertag And it isn't meant to. It IS meant to act as tutor/study aid. Not replace the teacher.
@@vKILLZ0NEvSure, but people always take the path of least resistance when they’re not informed of the consequences
@@zhen7020also it’s impossible to fact-check the things AI says, it’s just generating responses. It may be accurate the vast majority of the time but how about when it’s not?
Always remember, kids, the hypothenuse is always opposite the 90° angle, in a triangle that has one.
And a^2+b^2=c^2 only matches the pythagoream theorem, if it's describing a triangle with a 90° angle, and if c is the hypothenuse.
In addition, the hypotenuse is ALWAYS the longest side of any right triangle
@@abyudhmukkavilli6133right on
I wish I was high on potenuse.
@@BigMikeyT730 I wish I was high on potenuse.
*Everyone laughs way more when I say it*
@@TheSlick447 i most certainly laughed
there's literally a black mirror episode about this in the new season
There's a new black mirror season?
Are you talking about Joan is Awful?
@@barabara9855 I think they are, in which case it's really not a *new* season
@@TheAbdou27literally 😂 .
0:33 you can see him trying not to laugh
Lol, literally swallowing his laughter down.
😂
Either that or he is internally crying thinking of what his job has come too😂
1:08 just like spongebob just did...
Thats exactly what I thought
Not Ludwig saying he only uses AI for TTS when he admitted yesterday to using ChatGPT for every Japanese lesson he's been doing
Exactly, It's Not Ludwig, It's Mogul Mail.
hes using youtube and google and his camera app and all of these are ai tools
Anti-AI Andys are delusional and are going to be very blindsided by what's coming. AI tools are already used every day but people just don't realize it.
Yeah, also, predictive keyboard/autocorrect on the phone, google tools, Siri, plenty of stuff has AI and people don't think about it twice.
@@Allen_lena its literally unavoidable to use ai tools on the daily unless you are amish
Apparently there's a historical example (precedent) where Ford hired impersonators of singers for an ad when the original singers declined, and Ford lost the court case when the singers sued (Midler v. Ford Motor Co.).
Anyone who thinks stealing someone's voice is okay just needs to lose their jobs to an AI or have identity theft/fraud via AI committed against them in order for them to get it...
Holy shit Mogul Mail broke into Ludwig’s new setup again?
He can’t keep getting away with this.
I think what makes it crazier this isn’t the first time this happened with Scarlett Johansson. Back somewhere in November of 2023 she sued an AI app for making AI photos of her and using her voice in an advertisement on Twitter. She was always vocal on this stuff, in 2018 talking about ai begins with p ends with n, and how it was so widespread that her team couldn’t do anything about it, I’m pretty sure Atrioc mentioned it in his apology/update on what he’s doing/done to try to fix what he did, showing how big the issue at hand was
The AI respond to the interview question literally gave me chills due how realistic it sounds...just nah bro, this is getting freaky af...
Robo Rizz got me bricked up fr 😞
🤣🤣🤣
I like this format and how the remaining tabs is a sort of a reverse progress bar for the video.
This is the same thing that has happened to artists since all the AI "art" stuff came out. It's disgusting and The founder of the AI model basically said "well it's already out there now so nothing we can do" So disgusting behaviour!
AI could cure cancer, solve world hunger, create world peace. And you're worried about a couple of creators being mad because a computer does there job better than them. Grow up!
@@peterswift6116 I know AI could do all these things and it's amazing. I am for AI. But the important thing is to have laws for it as well so that they can't steal without any reprecussion, that is just wrong. That has nothing to do with stopping AI as a whole. I think it's amazing to see where AI can take us. Just as long as it's ethical
@@peterswift6116 WE could do all those things ourselves, but noooooo, let's spend our time standing on a soap box telling people to grow up because gosh darn it getting upset that a robot is replacing you and that now both your career and degree are irrelevant and you can't find work is just sooooooooo damn immature!
Amirite guys? Please shower this man with validation and fake internet points so that he may know how much better he is than everyone else. Also, please remember to forget this sentiment as when AI inevitably replaces him too, he intends to scream from the rooftops about how unfair the world is because AI should only replace jobs that aren't his!!1!1!
@@Code_Machine bro if you think im saying that because i want 'internet points' then your life must be really sad. I dont try to validate myself in the youtube comments lol I have a real life for that. Regardless I am right, AI is positive and everyone who complains and it replacing them is just too dumb and lazy to find real work for themselves. Also the other thing is, AI is inevitable. Neither you nor me nor anyone in this comment section could make any impact on how much AI there will be in the future. So everyone should stop being whiny little bitches about it and just accept it will be part of society.
You know a hundred of years ago in the industrial revolution everyone was scared all there jobs would get replaced because of the impending 'automation'. And they were right, millions of factory jobs got replaced. But look what happened, they found new jobs and society prospered. we laugh at those people now. You are no different, just a unimpactful pleb who's only contribution to society is complaining.
@@Code_Machine bro if you think im saying that because i want 'internet points' then your life must be really sad. I dont try to validate myself in the youtube comments lol I have a real life for that. Regardless I am right, AI is positive and everyone who complains and it replacing them is just too dumb and lazy to find real work for themselves. Also the other thing is, AI is inevitable. Neither you nor me nor anyone in this comment section could make any impact on how much AI there will be in the future. So everyone should stop being whiny little bitches about it and just accept it will be part of society.
You know a hundred of years ago in the industrial revolution everyone was scared all there jobs would get replaced because of the impending 'automation'. And they were right, millions of factory jobs got replaced. But look what happened, they found new jobs and society prospered. we laugh at those people now. You are no different, just a unimpactful pleb who's only contribution to society is complaining.
It for sure doesn’t help that Scarlet Johanson is kinda big on Actors rights. She won’t need some settlement, she will likely go all the way for answers.
OpenAI trying to catch the biggest and juiciest class-action suit in history 😂
all it takes is the AI to mess up while translating and there goes your visa
0:29 I felt that
Legit, I appreciate your Mogul Mail content so much.
i was just reading about this on reddit and then mogul mail uploads about it. good service.
i remember ti8 when openai was introduced to dota 2, who knew theyd go this big.
"that's the Malenia of lawsuits" killed me lmao
The law of unintended consequences is strong with this… entire situation.
this is INSANE and I'm really glad to see Ludwig commenting on it
Her, Detroit become human, now this - Scarlett can't catch a break from ai lol
Lud's face during the spongebob voice tickled my pickle
AI rizzing me up before i get ready for an interview so i get all giggly on the interview
I actually really like these type of videos, I'm not always caught up with these small things that are happening in the world.
hella dystopian
00:42 seconds was the climax of the vid
RIP to anyone listening to the intro with max volume while having no headphones on
He’s saying stuff that’s true
Wow bro that's crazy
What?! Nah, bro's on one.
ngl bro ngl
damn that's craaazy
Debatable
If you steal from the rich you go to jail trying to make it rich….
If the rich steal from you, they get richer
As a teacher watching this on my break, I really enjoyed the first ~45 seconds of this Mogul Mail!
the gaze of disappointment, sadness and regret in ludwig's eyes when he plays the sponge bob AI voice explains so much.
Coming fast like spongebob
He looks so sad at the beginning
00:28 He looks so sad, so defeated
Just to be correct settling a lawsuit is not winning and has no affect on future lawsuits.
Wtf Why is Mogul Mail in the same new room as the other less attractive streamer Ludwig
At 3:32, I love how the contrast between all of the technological and cultural advancement that humanity has gone through is displayed. On one end; there is OpenAI, a fenomenal tool for all sorts of utility. And on the other end, there is "Pizza axe". Oh the humanity, how I love it. I did a thing surely wins this for me, sure is funny!
Every time Greg Brockman is in the news I just think about how crazy it is that he was my roommate for a semester at MIT when he transferred from Harvard
I feel like Lud changes stream rooms more often than he changes his underwear
the thing is, the positives do not outweigh the negatives. so many of the positives aid in loosing the interpersonal connections that make us human. and that is a huge, terrifying problem. also nice room hope chat doesn't mess it up with things that may or may not spin
its been proven again and again that a lack of human relationships negatively affects brain development in a number of ways
AI could cure cancer, solve world hunger, create world peace. And you're worried about a couple of creators being mad because a computer does there job better than them. Grow up!
@@peterswift6116 no it absolutely cannot solve those things. also get your reading comprehension checked, thats not all i was talking about.
are you copy pasting this message on multiple comments or are your just a bot LMAO
regardless this is a program that generates mid essays, not an actual intelligence it cannot solve problems it just generates text
How natural and realistic the GPT-40 sounds like is what scares me. It looks like we're straight up heading to some cyberpunk dystopia where majority of the population dates some AI girl/boyfriend, and that honestly scares me. We laugh and joke about it now, who would be lonely enough to date such a thing? But AI is barely taking its first baby steps, imagine in a couple of years how unbelievably good it'll be. And once it's virtually impossible to distinguish if the person you're talking to is real or not, there's a huge amount of people who'd choose to date the perfect parter you can have immediately without any effort rather than go out into the real world.
Don't assume we're at the floor, assume we're near the ceiling. There is research that shows the amount of data needed to achieve a generally useful model capable of solving complex problems doesn't exist.
@@DerekHansell We don't need a general AI that can solve complex problems for the dystopia I described, we only need a chatbot using machine learning that is good enough to fool most humans that its a real person talking/chatting.
lol
@@ReelRaiIt also needs to have a convincing memory. But otherwise yup:(
Should be an easy case. If there's a different person behind the voice, it doesn't matter how she feels about it.
Imagine if a studio was going to film a movie and asked her to be in it, and she said no. To my knowledge, it is not illegal for them to go hire a different actress that looks a lot like her if that was the original look of the role for the movie. Even if they put the script together with her in mind. Her saying since I said no, you have to now change the look of the main character is a very bold thing to do.
Her is one of my top 3 movies
an etimology guy on tiktok said that over 60000 papers were made with ai in the past year by looking for bias of specific words being used
4:10 theyre just staring at the phone instead of eachother
I think it's more for demonstration purposes
Yeah it’s almost like they are demonstrating…a product used on a phone
It is still way smoother than any other translator.
Maybe they're autistic, don't shame them
@@doobzsalam1847 how does staring at the phone demonstrate the product better? I’d think a proper demonstration would show them having a natural conversation no? Not really a big deal just a weird choice that they went out of their way to make technology that opens up human connections on an incredible scale look robotic and unpersonal in a product demonstration.
the pain in luds face during the spongebob voice hahaha
The sky voice was available in ChatGPT months ago. It was not "launched" as a part of GPT-4o
If OpenAI merely hired a voice actor with a scarily similar voice, it might be hard to prosecute them
Plausible Deniability isn't the defense people are making it out to be in this regard. They screwed up by showing their intention. It's like when the Discord messages were leaked about the art AIs. Once the intention is known, saying "it just happened to end up that way!" doesn't give you the benefit of the doubt. Courts are slow, not stupid.
@@BubblyBoaryeah but she doesn’t own that other lady’s voice.
@@Purriahworking as an impersonator isnt a stable job, its a liability
@@Purriah If it's actually the other lady's voice, sure.
@@BubblyBoar yeah I learned more later; apparently there was a historical example (precedent) where Ford hired an impersonator of a singer for an ad when the original singer declined, and Ford lost the court case.
5:04 these people need to log off and touch grass 💀
Fr
It's literally their job. The people that need to log off are the ones on twitter complaining about the sky voice takedown.
That spongebob text to speech is so cursed
i miss the old room
So when everyone will be able to clone their own voice, all those who have a voice similar to any celebrity won't be allowed? Finding a solution to this is not easy.
For the flirty part, if you don't want it to be so you can just tell it and it will adapt to your preference (many people don't get this). I personally also don't think that's the default way the chatbot is going to speak, they might have used it just to showcase the product.
1:09 same
nice pfp
Ayo?
@@sakurai6016thanks i like yours too
Big difference between using a Spongebob sounding voice and having a Spongebob sounding voice that says it is Spongebob. The latter is infringement, the former is not.
Her is one of my favorite movies so its wild to see it being created irl
The only thing that scares me is buzzcut Ludwig.
"That's illegal", a few seconds later: "there's no legislation at the moment". Lol
Exactly. UA-camrs are always talking about "fair use", but AI training should be illegal? It is pretty much the definition of "transformative", as long as it's not trained to specifically be/talk like a specific person, of course
@@Meh_zzz AI training without explicit consent should be illegal. You shouldn't be allowed to use data without consent. Explicit consent! That means directly asking people to confirm they agree with their data and likeness being used and well...paying them for it if necessary
@@sorabrend5274Fair Use means no consent needed. Read the fair use clause, it carves out huge exceptions of using copyright for learning, training, and research.
@@sorabrend5274 no you dont. do you know what fair use is ?
His face during the SpongeBob impression looks like he’s rehearsing an apology video
Instantly translating a conversation is the best use of AI I’ve heard so far.
maybe lud has actually been ai generated this whole time
TESTICLES TESTICLES TESTICLES
Always remember that if something is good with AI, it’s best to assume it was stolen.
“They are coming and they are coming fast” -Ludwig
WHY WAS SPONGEBOB SAYING HIS OWN NAME???????
Sponges reproduce asexually, so he was absolutely fucking himself
he can asexually reproduce so he just split himself in two
ai is literally ruining my life right now because i write formally and at a high level for school so detectors come back like 80-90% ai written (i am also an artist. double whammy)
Adapt to the times. We can't halt technological advancements for you when the benefit is larger than you
@@Nathan47223I’m so happy to have our oldest mode of human expression (art) made “obsolete,” and all the joy of it sucked out, by tech bros in the name of profits they won’t ever see. The dream of being a career artist, in any field, is dead in the water now.
@@Nathan47223 it is not just me who is suffering.
bro one of my background tabs started playing some estep music towards the end of the spongebob ai voice so it seemed like you did a sigma edit of it im dead
Lud making all those sultry faces during SpongeBob .... You know what you're doing
i mean if they actually hired a different voice actor that happens to sound similar, what exactly is the issue?
people with similar voices certainly exist.
The issue is whether they "happend to sound similar". If ScarJo can prove that OpenAI sought out an impersonator after she turned them down, then it is a legal case
It'll definitely be interesting to see what the ruling is on this. They were clearly trying to imitate her voice, but there are billions of voices in the world. How do you then determine what voices are copyrighted and what ones aren't? You can't make a natural sounding ai voice without it sounding like someone that exists.
There’s already a precedent court case on sth like that. *Midler V Ford* : Hiring a voice impersonator to specifically impersonate a celebrity voice to circumvent copyrights law is not allowed.
Although, they have to prove that it’s intentional. Eg. Memo saying “make it sound like ScarJo” or testimony from voice actress etc.
Ya except they reached out to her, she said no, they then found a voice who was exactly like her. It would be different if they had just started with a different person and didn't reach out at all
Plausible Deniability isn't the defense people are making it out to be in this regard. They screwed up by showing their intention. It's like when the Discord messages were leaked about the art AIs. Once the intention is known, saying "it just happened to end up that way!" doesn't give you the benefit of the doubt. Courts are slow, not stupid.
Art and music should be off limits for AI, ai should be used for those jobs people hste, not their passions
I disagree, everyone should be able to create their own musics or videos even if they have no talent.
AI will allow everyone to make their own high quality music , movies and entertainment with no effort.
How is that not a good thing ?
Artists are just too selfish to share their ability to create with the common people.
@@galifrey2242Nope, they are creating nothing, they are merely stealing stuff and calling ut their creation, instead of learning a skill
@@galifrey2242creating is easy, all you need is a pencil and a paper, artist's aren't selfish for being against theft, and AI is the lazy route
@@galifrey2242 bro its not an ability they own you just haven't put in the effort to gain the ability and want to take a shortcut to get where they got with effort
@@letsgetfluffy3138 no, ai art is still art
Dont ask me if I like your stream room, im not your friend 😂
AI accesses publicly available information and uses that information to generate ideas.
The distinction between generation and regurgitation will be enough for any lawyer to defend AI in court.
New prejudicial and discriminant laws will have to be created specifically to constrict AI.
The singularity point is fast approaching...
And we are all about to get pushed through the eye of a needle..
Seems like I am the only one who didn't think it was a Scarlett Johansson imitator.
Maybe you didn't watch the "Her" movie.
honestly she's probably just butthurt that she's not essential and that somebody else can actually do the job
@@takeuchi5760 I did watch the her movie (and comparisons in the video) - I'm not saying they're not similar in tone and 'feeling' but the underlying voice is obviously not her.
@@Klaypersonwhat you mean?
@@Klaypersonunlike you she at least has a job
They should have sci-fi writers in congress preparing laws for future AI conflicts
The intro played while I was in the room with my parents
Wow this mogul mail guy reminds me of Ludwig
ScarJo WON against Disney, AND somebody tried again.
"She won against Disney", o7 for chat(gpt)
I sure hope that OpenAI and these other companies are held to account. I can't believe human art and beauty, emotion, so much more was so shamelessly reduced to nothing but noise and "feeder data". It's disheartening to see this garbage replace people in their jobs, when it was both never warranted or needed.
They didn't appear out of thin air. Why can't their be any respect in the art and beauty that goes into making it?
I disagree, I want AI to replace the corruption we have in the current industry
@@PaulFilmer because there is no effort or beauty. Its all stolen infomation. Algorithms.
AI doesn't make art. Everything you see is taken from someone else's creative efforts.
If its not needed, why would it replace people's jobs? Ideally in a market economy only people who are needed get jobs...
@@dimyell depends if you want to see software as art, that maybe it it's
This video was amazing to me. About to graduate with a degree in cognitive science and trying to get into the world of AI legislation, what you have said has been so much more representative of AI than what most "experts" have claimed on mainstream news outlets like CNN. There's a lot of misinfo out there about AI because it's complicated but props to Ludwig for actually doing some research.
its not technically illegal, there's no way the own the IP of a text to speech that happens to sound like spongebob, they'd need to prove it was trained on spongebob's voice which is easier said than done and even then i'm not sure if they'd own the voice of the character.
Ok but like there's NOTHING illegal about using the voice of someone imitating someone else. Therefore, unless openai lied (which isn't impossible) Scarlett is crying for no reason.
It’s not really ethical though, and just bc there aren’t laws about (which I have no idea, I don’t even know if that’s true) doesn’t make it okay. Like I feel like anyone should have the right to not have their voices copied and used by some ai bs or be okay with it
@@ghostlyexe but no one can imitate a voice perfectly? It's not Scarlet's voice. Its the VA's voice...
@@ghostlyexe it wasnt the ai making the voice it was a human being
@@ghostlyexe fair use.